HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

Chow's lemma, named after Wei-Liang Chow, is one of the foundational results in algebraic geometry. It roughly says that a
proper morphism In algebraic geometry, a proper morphism between schemes is an analog of a proper map between complex analytic spaces. Some authors call a proper variety over a field ''k'' a complete variety. For example, every projective variety over a fi ...
is fairly close to being a
projective morphism This is a glossary of algebraic geometry. See also glossary of commutative algebra, glossary of classical algebraic geometry, and glossary of ring theory. For the number-theoretic applications, see glossary of arithmetic and Diophantine geometry. ...
. More precisely, a version of it states the following: :If X is a scheme that is proper over a
noetherian In mathematics, the adjective Noetherian is used to describe objects that satisfy an ascending or descending chain condition on certain kinds of subobjects, meaning that certain ascending or descending sequences of subobjects must have finite leng ...
base S, then there exists a projective S-scheme X' and a surjective S-morphism f: X' \to X that induces an isomorphism f^(U) \simeq U for some dense open U\subseteq X.


Proof

The proof here is a standard one.


Reduction to the case of X irreducible

We can first reduce to the case where X is irreducible. To start, X is noetherian since it is of finite type over a noetherian base. Therefore it has finitely many irreducible components X_i, and we claim that for each X_i there is an irreducible proper S-scheme Y_i so that Y_i\to X has set-theoretic image X_i and is an isomorphism on the open dense subset X_i\setminus \cup_ X_j of X_i. To see this, define Y_i to be the scheme-theoretic image of the open immersion :X\setminus \cup_ X_j \to X. Since X\setminus \cup_ X_j is set-theoretically noetherian for each i, the map X\setminus \cup_ X_j\to X is quasi-compact and we may compute this scheme-theoretic image affine-locally on X, immediately proving the two claims. If we can produce for each Y_i a projective S-scheme Y_i' as in the statement of the theorem, then we can take X' to be the disjoint union \coprod Y_i' and f to be the composition \coprod Y_i' \to \coprod Y_i\to X: this map is projective, and an isomorphism over a dense open set of X, while \coprod Y_i' is a projective S-scheme since it is a finite union of projective S-schemes. Since each Y_i is proper over S, we've completed the reduction to the case X irreducible.


X can be covered by finitely many quasi-projective S-schemes

Next, we will show that X can be covered by a finite number of open subsets U_i so that each U_i is quasi-projective over S. To do this, we may by quasi-compactness first cover S by finitely many affine opens S_j, and then cover the preimage of each S_j in X by finitely many affine opens X_ each with a closed immersion in to \mathbb^n_ since X\to S is of finite type and therefore quasi-compact. Composing this map with the open immersions \mathbb^n_\to \mathbb^n_ and \mathbb^n_ \to \mathbb^n_S, we see that each X_ is a closed subscheme of an open subscheme of \mathbb^n_S. As \mathbb^n_S is noetherian, every closed subscheme of an open subscheme is also an open subscheme of a closed subscheme, and therefore each X_ is quasi-projective over S.


Construction of X' and f:X'\to X

Now suppose \ is a finite open cover of X by quasi-projective S-schemes, with \phi_i:U_i\to P_i an open immersion in to a projective S-scheme. Set U=\cap_i U_i, which is nonempty as X is irreducible. The restrictions of the \phi_i to U define a morphism :\phi: U \to P = P_1 \times_S \cdots \times_S P_n so that U\to U_i\to P_i = U\stackrel P \stackrel P_i, where U\to U_i is the canonical injection and p_i:P\to P_i is the projection. Letting j:U\to X denote the canonical open immersion, we define \psi=(j,\phi)_S: U\to X\times_S P, which we claim is an immersion. To see this, note that this morphism can be factored as the graph morphism U\to U\times_S P (which is a closed immersion as P\to S is separated) followed by the open immersion U\times_S P\to X\times_S P; as X\times_S P is noetherian, we can apply the same logic as before to see that we can swap the order of the open and closed immersions. Now let X' be the scheme-theoretic image of \psi, and factor \psi as : \psi:U\stackrel X'\stackrel X\times_S P where \psi' is an open immersion and h is a closed immersion. Let q_1:X\times_S P\to X and q_2:X\times_S P\to P be the canonical projections. Set :f:X'\stackrel X\times_S P \stackrel X, :g:X'\stackrel X\times_S P \stackrel P. We will show that X' and f satisfy the conclusion of the theorem.


Verification of the claimed properties of X' and f

To show f is surjective, we first note that it is proper and therefore closed. As its image contains the dense open set U\subset X, we see that f must be surjective. It is also straightforward to see that f induces an isomorphism on U: we may just combine the facts that f^(U)=h^(U\times_S P) and \psi is an isomorphism on to its image, as \psi factors as the composition of a closed immersion followed by an open immersion U\to U\times_S P \to X\times_S P. It remains to show that X' is projective over S. We will do this by showing that g:X'\to P is an immersion. We define the following four families of open subschemes: : V_i = \phi_i(U_i)\subset P_i : W_i = p_i^(V_i)\subset P : U_i' = f^(U_i)\subset X' : U_i'' = g^(W_i)\subset X'. As the U_i cover X, the U_i' cover X', and we wish to show that the U_i'' also cover X'. We will do this by showing that U_i'\subset U_i'' for all i. It suffices to show that p_i\circ g, _:U_i'\to P_i is equal to \phi_i\circ f, _:U_i'\to P_i as a map of topological spaces. Replacing U_i' by its reduction, which has the same underlying topological space, we have that the two morphisms (U_i')_\to P_i are both extensions of the underlying map of topological space U\to U_i\to P_i, so by the reduced-to-separated lemma they must be equal as U is topologically dense in U_i. Therefore U_i'\subset U_i'' for all i and the claim is proven. The upshot is that the W_i cover g(X'), and we can check that g is an immersion by checking that g, _:U_i''\to W_i is an immersion for all i. For this, consider the morphism : u_i:W_i\stackrel V_i\stackrel U_i\to X. Since X\to S is separated, the graph morphism \Gamma_:W_i\to X\times_S W_i is a closed immersion and the graph T_i=\Gamma_(W_i) is a closed subscheme of X\times_S W_i; if we show that U\to X\times_S W_i factors through this graph (where we consider U\subset X' via our observation that f is an isomorphism over f^(U) from earlier), then the map from U_i'' must also factor through this graph by construction of the scheme-theoretic image. Since the restriction of q_2 to T_i is an isomorphism onto W_i, the restriction of g to U_i'' will be an immersion into W_i, and our claim will be proven. Let v_i be the canonical injection U\subset X' \to X\times_S W_i; we have to show that there is a morphism w_i:U\subset X'\to W_i so that v_i=\Gamma_\circ w_i. By the definition of the fiber product, it suffices to prove that q_1\circ v_i= u_i\circ q_2\circ v_i, or by identifying U\subset X and U\subset X', that q_1\circ\psi=u_i\circ q_2\circ \psi. But q_1\circ\psi = j and q_2\circ\psi=\phi, so the desired conclusion follows from the definition of \phi:U\to P and g is an immersion. Since X'\to S is proper, any S-morphism out of X' is closed, and thus g:X'\to P is a closed immersion, so X' is projective. \blacksquare


Additional statements

In the statement of Chow's lemma, if X is reduced, irreducible, or integral, we can assume that the same holds for X'. If both X and X' are irreducible, then f: X' \to X is a
birational In mathematics, birational geometry is a field of algebraic geometry in which the goal is to determine when two algebraic varieties are isomorphic outside lower-dimensional subsets. This amounts to studying mappings that are given by rationa ...
morphism.


References


Bibliography

* *{{Hartshorne AG Theorems in algebraic geometry Zhou, Weiliang