Case Of Sutton's Hospital
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Case of Sutton's Hospital'' (1612) 77 Eng Rep 960 is an old
common law Common law (also known as judicial precedent, judge-made law, or case law) is the body of law primarily developed through judicial decisions rather than statutes. Although common law may incorporate certain statutes, it is largely based on prece ...
case decided by Sir Edward Coke. It concerned The Charterhouse, London, which was held to be a properly constituted corporation.


Facts

Thomas Sutton was a coal mine owner and moneylender, as well as the Master of Ordnance for the North of England, a military position. He founded a
school A school is the educational institution (and, in the case of in-person learning, the Educational architecture, building) designed to provide learning environments for the teaching of students, usually under the direction of teachers. Most co ...
and hospital as a corporation at the London Charterhouse. When he died, he left a large part of his estate to the charity. Sutton's other heirs challenged the bequest by arguing that the charity was improperly constituted. Therefore, they argued, it lacked a legal personality to be the subject of a transfer of property.


Judgment

In a full hearing of the King's Bench, it was held that the incorporation was valid, as was the subsequent foundation of the charity and so the transfer of property to it, including the nomination of a master of the charity to receive the donation, was not void. Sir Edward Coke wrote in the report the following.


Citations

The case has been cited in a number of subsequent decisions. Notably, in '' Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC'' 9922 AC 1, Lord Templeman referred to it, and although he acknowledged it to be good law, he also noted that to modern eyes the language was so impenetrable that most lawyers simply took it on faith that the case stood for the principle for which it is cited. He summarised the ''
ratio decidendi ' (; Latin plural ') is a Latin phrase meaning "the reason" or "the rationale for the decision". The ''ratio decidendi'' is "the point in a case that determines the judgement" or "the principle that the case establishes".See Barron's Law Dictio ...
'' of the case thus: The case was also cited with approval (but distinguished) in another
House of Lords The House of Lords is the upper house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Like the lower house, the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, House of Commons, it meets in the Palace of Westminster in London, England. One of the oldest ext ...
case, '' Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co Ltd v Riche'' (1875) LR 7 HL 653.


See also

*
UK company law British company law regulates corporations formed under the Companies Act 2006. Also governed by the Insolvency Act 1986, the UK Corporate Governance Code, European Union Directive (European Union), Directives and court cases, the company is th ...
*''
Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd is a landmark UK company law case. The effect of the House of Lords' unanimous ruling was to uphold firmly the doctrine of corporate personality, as set out in the Companies Act 1862, so that creditors of an insolvent company could not sue the ...
'' 897AC 22 *'' Lennard's Carrying Co Ltd v Asiatic Petroleum Co Ltd''
915 Year 915 ( CMXV) was a common year starting on Sunday of the Julian calendar. Events By place Europe * Summer – Battle of Garigliano: The Christian League, personally led by Pope John X, lays siege to Garigliano (a fortified Ar ...
AC 705 *
United States corporate law United States corporate law regulates the governance, finance and power of corporations in US law. Every state and territory has its own basic corporate code, while federal law creates minimum standards for trade in company shares and governan ...
*'' Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward'', 17 US 518 (1819) *'' Paul v. Virginia'', 75 US 168 (1869), a corporation was not a citizen within the meaning of the
Privileges and Immunities Clause The Privileges and Immunities Clause (United States Constitution, U.S. Constitution, Article Four of the United States Constitution, Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1, also known as the Comity Clause) prevents a U.S. state, state of the United Stat ...
*'' Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company'', 118 US 394 (1886) in a property tax case, the US Supreme Court holds that corporations are obviously "persons" with the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment *''
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ''Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission'', 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a List of landmark court decisions in the United States, landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, United States Supreme Court regarding Campaign fin ...
'', 130 S.Ct. 876 (2010) corporations are persons under the First Amendment and hence have the unlimited right to produce campaigning material at election times


Notes


References

*{{cite journal , first=D. , last=Wishart , title=A reconfiguration of company law and/or corporate law theory , year=2010 , volume=10 , issue=1 , journal=Journal of Corporate Law Studies , pages=151–178


External links


"The Case of Sutton’s Hospital."
from Sir Edward Coke, ''Selected Writings of Sir Edward Coke'', vol. I, at the Online Library of Liberty 1612 in English law 1610s in case law United Kingdom company case law 1612 in England Edward Coke cases United Kingdom corporate personality case law History of corporate law Court of Exchequer Chamber cases