HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

The Bunyakovsky conjecture (or Bouniakowsky conjecture) gives a criterion for a
polynomial In mathematics, a polynomial is an expression consisting of indeterminates (also called variables) and coefficients, that involves only the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and positive-integer powers of variables. An ex ...
f(x) in one variable with
integer An integer is the number zero (), a positive natural number (, , , etc.) or a negative integer with a minus sign ( −1, −2, −3, etc.). The negative numbers are the additive inverses of the corresponding positive numbers. In the language ...
coefficients In mathematics, a coefficient is a multiplicative factor in some term of a polynomial, a series, or an expression; it is usually a number, but may be any expression (including variables such as , and ). When the coefficients are themselves ...
to give infinitely many prime values in the sequencef(1), f(2), f(3),\ldots. It was stated in 1857 by the Russian
mathematician A mathematician is someone who uses an extensive knowledge of mathematics in their work, typically to solve mathematical problems. Mathematicians are concerned with numbers, data, quantity, mathematical structure, structure, space, Mathematica ...
Viktor Bunyakovsky. The following three conditions are necessary for f(x) to have the desired prime-producing property: # The leading coefficient is positive, # The polynomial is irreducible over the rationals (and integers). # The values f(1), f(2), f(3),\ldots have no common factor. (In particular, the coefficients of f(x) should be relatively prime.) Bunyakovsky's conjecture is that these conditions are sufficient: if f(x) satisfies (1)–(3), then f(n) is prime for infinitely many positive integers n. A seemingly weaker yet equivalent statement to Bunyakovsky's conjecture is that for every integer polynomial f(x) that satisfies (1)–(3), f(n) is prime for ''at least one'' positive integer n: but then, since the translated polynomial f(x+n) still satisfies (1)–(3), in view of the weaker statement f(m) is prime for at least one positive integer m>n, so that f(n) is indeed prime for infinitely many positive integers n. Bunyakovsky's conjecture is a special case of Schinzel's hypothesis H, one of the most famous open problems in number theory.


Discussion of three conditions

We need the first condition because if the leading coefficient is negative then f(x) < 0 for all large x, and thus f(n) is not a (positive) prime number for large positive integers n. (This merely satisfies the sign convention that primes are positive.) We need the second condition because if f(x) = g(x)h(x) where the polynomials g(x) and h(x) have integer coefficients, then we have f(n) = g(n)h(n) for all integers n; but g(x) and h(x) take the values 0 and \pm 1 only finitely many times, so f(n) is composite for all large n. The second condition also fails for the polynomials reducible over the rationals. For example, the integer-valued polynomial P(x)=(1/12)\cdot x^4+(11/12)\cdot x^2+2 doesn't satisfy the condition (2) since P(x)=(1/12)\cdot (x^4+11x^2+24)=(1/12)\cdot(x^2+3)\cdot(x^2+8), so at least one of the latter two factors must be a divisor of 12 in order to have P(x) prime, which holds only if abs(x)\le 3. The corresponding values are 2, 3, 7, 17, so these are the only such primes for integral x since all of these numbers are prime. This isn't a counterexample to Bunyakovsky conjecture since the condition (2) fails. The third condition, that the numbers f(n) have gcd 1, is obviously necessary, but is somewhat subtle, and is best understood by a counterexample. Consider f(x) = x^2 + x + 2, which has positive leading coefficient and is irreducible, and the coefficients are relatively prime; however f(n) is ''even'' for all integers n, and so is prime only finitely many times (namely when f(n)=2, in fact only at n =0,-1). In practice, the easiest way to verify the third condition is to find one pair of positive integers m and n such that f(m) and f(n) are relatively prime. In general, for any integer-valued polynomial f(x) = c_0 + c_1x + \cdots + c_dx^d we can use \gcd \_ = \gcd(f(m),f(m+1),\dots,f(m+d)) for any integer m, so the gcd is given by values of f(x) at any consecutive d+1 integers. In the example above, we have f(-1)=2, f(0)=2, f(1)=4 and so the gcd is 2, which implies that x^2 + x + 2 has even values on the integers. Alternatively, f(x) can be written in the basis of binomial coefficient polynomials: :f(x) = a_0 + a_1\binom + \cdots + a_d\binom where each a_i is an integer, and \gcd\_ = \gcd(a_0,a_1,\dots,a_d). For the above example, we have: :x^2 + x + 2 = 2\binom + 2\binom + 2, and the coefficients in the second formula have gcd 2. Using this gcd formula, it can be proved \gcd\_ =1 if and only if there are positive integers m and n such that f(m) and f(n) are relatively prime.


Examples


A simple quadratic polynomial

Some prime values of the polynomial f(x) = x^2 + 1 are listed in the following table. (Values of x form
OEIS The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS) is an online database of integer sequences. It was created and maintained by Neil Sloane while researching at AT&T Labs. He transferred the intellectual property and hosting of the OEIS to th ...
sequence ; those of x^2 + 1 form .) That n^2+1 should be prime infinitely often is a problem first raised by Euler, and it is also the fifth Hardy–Littlewood conjecture and the fourth of
Landau's problems At the 1912 International Congress of Mathematicians, Edmund Landau listed four basic problems about prime numbers. These problems were characterised in his speech as "unattackable at the present state of mathematics" and are now known as Landau' ...
. Despite the extensive numerical evidence it is not known that this sequence extends indefinitely.


Cyclotomic polynomials

The
cyclotomic polynomial In mathematics, the ''n''th cyclotomic polynomial, for any positive integer ''n'', is the unique irreducible polynomial with integer coefficients that is a divisor of x^n-1 and is not a divisor of x^k-1 for any Its roots are all ''n''th primit ...
s \Phi_k(x) for k=1,2,3,\ldots satisfy the three conditions of Bunyakovsky's conjecture, so for all ''k'', there should be infinitely many natural numbers ''n'' such that \Phi_k(n) is prime. It can be shown that if for all ''k'', there exists an integer ''n'' > 1 with \Phi_k(n) prime, then for all ''k'', there are infinitely many natural numbers ''n'' with \Phi_k(n) prime. The following sequence gives the smallest natural number ''n'' > 1 such that \Phi_k(n) is prime, for k=1,2,3,\ldots: :3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 5, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 6, 2, 4, 3, 2, 10, 2, 22, 2, 2, 4, 6, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 14, 3, 61, 2, 10, 2, 14, 2, 15, 25, 11, 2, 5, 5, 2, 6, 30, 11, 24, 7, 7, 2, 5, 7, 19, 3, 2, 2, 3, 30, 2, 9, 46, 85, 2, 3, 3, 3, 11, 16, 59, 7, 2, 2, 22, 2, 21, 61, 41, 7, 2, 2, 8, 5, 2, 2, ... . This sequence is known to contain some large terms: the 545th term is 2706, the 601st is 2061, and the 943rd is 2042. This case of Bunyakovsky's conjecture is widely believed, but again it is not known that the sequence extends indefinitely. Usually, there is integer 2≤n≤ φ(k) such that \Phi_k(n) is prime (note that the
degree Degree may refer to: As a unit of measurement * Degree (angle), a unit of angle measurement ** Degree of geographical latitude ** Degree of geographical longitude * Degree symbol (°), a notation used in science, engineering, and mathemati ...
of \Phi_k(n) is φ(k)), but there are exceptions, the exception numbers k are : 1, 2, 25, 37, 44, 68, 75, 82, 99, 115, 119, 125, 128, 159, 162, 179, 183, 188, 203, 213, 216, 229, 233, 243, 277, 289, 292, ...


Partial results: only Dirichlet's theorem

To date, the only case of Bunyakovsky's conjecture that has been proved is that of polynomials of degree 1. This is Dirichlet's theorem, which states that when a and m are relatively prime integers there are infinitely many prime numbers p \equiv a \pmod m. This is Bunyakovsky's conjecture for f(x) = a + mx (or a - mx if m < 0). The third condition in Bunyakovsky's conjecture for a linear polynomial mx + a is equivalent to a and m being relatively prime. No single case of Bunyakovsky's conjecture for degree greater than 1 is proved, although numerical evidence in higher degree is consistent with the conjecture.


Generalized Bunyakovsky conjecture

Given k \geq 1 polynomials with positive degrees and integer coefficients, each satisfying the three conditions, assume that for any prime p there is an n such that none of the values of the k polynomials at n are divisible by p. Given these assumptions, it is conjectured that there are infinitely many positive integers n such that all values of these k polynomials at x = n are prime. Note that the polynomials \ do not satisfy the assumption, since one of their values must be divisible by 3 for any integer x = n. Neither do \, since one of the values must be divisible by 3 for any x = n. On the other hand, \ do satisfy the assumption, and the conjecture implies the polynomials have simultaneous prime values for infinitely many positive integers x = n. This conjecture includes as special cases the twin prime conjecture (when k = 2, and the two polynomials are x and x + 2) as well as the infinitude of prime quadruplets (when k = 4, and the four polynomials are x, x+ 2, x + 6, and x + 8), sexy primes (when k = 2, and the two polynomials are x and x + 6), Sophie Germain primes (when k = 2, and the two polynomials are x and 2x + 1), and Polignac's conjecture (when k = 2, and the two polynomials are x and x + a, with a any even number). When all the polynomials have degree 1 this is
Dickson's conjecture In number theory, a branch of mathematics, Dickson's conjecture is the conjecture stated by that for a finite set of linear forms , , ..., with , there are infinitely many positive integers for which they are all prime, unless there is a congruen ...
. In fact, this conjecture is equivalent to the Generalized Dickson conjecture. Except for Dirichlet's theorem, no case of the conjecture has been proved, including the above cases.


See also

* Integer-valued polynomial * Cohn's irreducibility criterion * Schinzel's hypothesis H * Bateman–Horn conjecture * Hardy and Littlewood's conjecture F


References


Bibliography

* * * {{Prime number conjectures Conjectures about prime numbers Unsolved problems in number theory