HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In algebraic geometry, Bloch's higher Chow groups, a generalization of Chow group, is a precursor and a basic example of motivic cohomology (for smooth varieties). It was introduced by Spencer Bloch and the basic theory has been developed by Bloch and Marc Levine. In more precise terms, a theorem of Voevodsky implies: for a
smooth scheme In algebraic geometry, a smooth scheme over a field is a scheme which is well approximated by affine space near any point. Smoothness is one way of making precise the notion of a scheme with no singular points. A special case is the notion of a smoo ...
''X'' over a field and integers ''p'', ''q'', there is a natural isomorphism :\operatorname^p(X; \mathbb(q)) \simeq \operatorname^q(X, 2q - p) between motivic cohomology groups and higher Chow groups.


Motivation

One of the motivations for higher Chow groups comes from homotopy theory. In particular, if \alpha,\beta \in Z_*(X) are algebraic cycles in X which are rationally equivalent via a cycle \gamma \in Z_*(X\times \Delta^1), then \gamma can be thought of as a path between \alpha and \beta, and the higher Chow groups are meant to encode the information of higher homotopy coherence. For example,
\text^*(X,0)
can be thought of as the homotopy classes of cycles while
\text^*(X,1)
can be thought of as the homotopy classes of homotopies of cycles.


Definition

Let ''X'' be a quasi-projective algebraic scheme over a field (“algebraic” means separated and of finite type). For each integer q \ge 0, define :\Delta^q = \operatorname(\mathbb _0, \dots, t_q(t_0 + \dots + t_q - 1)), which is an algebraic analog of a standard ''q''-simplex. For each sequence 0 \le i_1 < i_2 < \cdots < i_r \le q, the closed subscheme t_ = t_ = \cdots = t_ = 0, which is isomorphic to \Delta^, is called a face of \Delta^q. For each ''i'', there is the embedding :\partial_: \Delta^ \overset\to \ \subset \Delta^q. We write Z_i(X) for the group of algebraic ''i''-cycles on ''X'' and z_r(X, q) \subset Z_(X \times \Delta^q) for the subgroup generated by closed subvarieties that intersect properly with X \times F for each face ''F'' of \Delta^q. Since \partial_ = \operatorname_X \times \partial_: X \times \Delta^ \hookrightarrow X \times \Delta^q is an effective Cartier divisor, there is the Gysin homomorphism: :\partial_^*: z_r(X, q) \to z_r(X, q-1), that (by definition) maps a subvariety ''V'' to the
intersection In mathematics, the intersection of two or more objects is another object consisting of everything that is contained in all of the objects simultaneously. For example, in Euclidean geometry, when two lines in a plane are not parallel, their i ...
(X \times \) \cap V. Define the boundary operator d_q = \sum_^q (-1)^i \partial_^* which yields the chain complex :\cdots \to z_r(X, q) \overset\to z_r(X, q-1) \overset\to \cdots \overset\to z_r(X, 0). Finally, the ''q''-th higher Chow group of ''X'' is defined as the ''q''-th homology of the above complex: :\operatorname_r(X, q) := \operatorname_q(z_r(X, \cdot)). (More simply, since z_r(X, \cdot) is naturally a simplicial abelian group, in view of the Dold–Kan correspondence, higher Chow groups can also be defined as homotopy groups \operatorname_r(X, q) := \pi_q z_r(X, \cdot).) For example, if V \subset X \times \Delta^1Here, we identify \Delta^1 with a subscheme of \mathbb^1 and then, without loss of generality, assume one vertex is the origin 0 and the other is ∞. is a closed subvariety such that the intersections V(0), V(\infty) with the faces 0, \infty are proper, then d_1(V) = V(0) - V(\infty) and this means, by Proposition 1.6. in Fulton’s intersection theory, that the image of d_1 is precisely the group of cycles rationally equivalent to zero; that is, :\operatorname_r(X, 0) = the ''r''-th Chow group of ''X''.


Properties


Functoriality

Proper maps f:X\to Y are covariant between the higher chow groups while flat maps are contravariant. Also, whenever X is smooth, any map from X is covariant.


Homotopy invariance

If E \to X is an algebraic vector bundle, then there is the homotopy equivalence
\text^*(X,n) \cong \text^*(E,n)


Localization

Given a closed equidimensional subscheme Y \subset X there is a localization long exact sequence
\begin \cdots \\ \text^(Y,2) \to \text^(X,2) \to \text^(U,2) \to & \\ \text^(Y,1) \to \text^(X,1) \to \text^(U,1) \to & \\ \text^(Y,0) \to \text^(X,0) \to \text^(U,0) \to & \text0 \end
where U = X-Y. In particular, this shows the higher chow groups naturally extend the exact sequence of chow groups.


Localization theorem

showed that, given an open subset U \subset X, for Y = X - U, :z(X, \cdot)/z(Y, \cdot) \to z(U, \cdot) is a homotopy equivalence. In particular, if Y has pure codimension, then it yields the long exact sequence for higher Chow groups (called the localization sequence).


References

* *{{cite journal , last1=Bloch , first1=Spencer , title=The moving lemma for higher Chow groups , journal=Journal of Algebraic Geometry , volume=3 , pages=537–568 , date=1994 *Peter Haine
An Overview of Motivic Cohomology
*Vladmir Voevodsky, “Motivic cohomology groups are isomorphic to higher Chow groups in any characteristic,” International Mathematics Research Notices 7 (2002), 351–355. Algebraic geometry