Content
The text begins by outlining the foundational articles of faith, and goes on to discuss the eternal essence (''dhat'') of Allah, His names and attributes, and the Qur'an as His eternal speech. Thereafter, it elaborates on how one acquires true faith ( iman) or enters into a state of unbelief (Authorship & Versions
There is some difference of opinion with regards to the authorship and versions of the Al Fiqh Al Akbar. According to Dutch Orientalist A.J. Wensinck,"The Fiqh Akbar (II), it is true, opens in the singular, probably because by doing so, it seeks to uphold the fiction of Abu Hanifa's authorship; but later the singular is dropped in favor of the plural"Early records, however show that Al Fiqh Al Akbar was already attributed to Abu Hanifa by 377AH/987CE; The indexer and bookseller of the fourth century, Ibn al-Nadim, states in his ''Kitab al-Fihrist'', (compiled in 377AH/987CE: "His bu Hanifa'sworks are the books Al-Fiqh Al-Akbar; Al-Risala to Uthman al-Batti (The Epistle to Uthman al Batti), and Al-'Alim wa 'I-Muta~llim (The Scholar and the Pupil)". Wensinck continues:
"We possess, however, another document, which contains valuable indications, namely, the Fiqh Absat. It rests on the answers given by Abu Hanifa to questions regarding dogmatics put to him by his pupil Abu Muti al- Balkhi. So as far as I can see, this pamphlet, a unique copy of which is preserved in Cairo, is genuine. Here we find, as a matter of fact, all the articles of Fiqh Akbar (1), with the exception of the article 7. This makes it probable that the editor and commentator of Fiqh Akbar (1) has borrowed the text on which he commented from the Fiqh Absat. So the Fiqh Akbar (1), though not composed by Abu Hanifa, is proved to be derived from genuine utterances of the master, with the possible exception of article 7. .... It is a strange fact that neither in Arabic literature nor in the European catalogues of Arabic manuscripts is any discrimination made between the two."Another scholar, Earl Edgar Elder, also agrees that Al Fiqh Al Akbar, "is wrongly attributed to Abu Hanifa", but "reflects his teaching". A detailed outline of the differences as well the evidences for his authorship is given by
Reception & Legacy
''Al-Fiqh al-Akbar'' is popular throughout the Muslim world and especially in and around the Indian Sub Continent. Among Hanafis it is considered essential for anyone wanting to study Islamic theology and philosophy. It has been cited by many Muslims and Islamic scholars from around the world since it's authorship.Translations & Commentaries
There have been many commentaries written on Al Fiqh Al Akbar including by Maghnisawi, Ali al-Qari and Abu 'l-Layth al-Samarqandi. In 2007, Abdur-Rahman Ibn Yusuf released a new English translation of this text, ''Al-Fiqh al-Akbar Explained.''Fiqh Akbar II
According to Alfred Guillaume, an Aqidah known as Fiqh Akbar II was compiled around 1000 CE and is made up of 29 articles. It is "based largely" on the teachings of Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Isḥāq Al-Ash'ari (874–936 CE). Guillaume considers it prominent enough to be "singled out" for special attention over other Aqidah. Some of Guillaume's summary of it goes:Allah is absolute in his decrees of good and evil. He does not resemble his creatures in any respect. He has existed from eternity with ll his qualities, those belonging to his essence and those pertaining to his activity. The Quran is the speech of Allah written in books, preserved in memories, recited by tongues, revealed to the Prophet. ... The speech of God is uncreate, the speech of Moses and others is created. We speak with organs of speech and letters; God speaks without instruments and letters. ... God has face, hand and soul, but it is not legitimate to inquire how, for these belong to his qualities; God has no body. ...
References
Sunni literature Kalam 7th-century Arabic books Maturidi literature {{Islam-book-stub