Šidák Correction
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
statistics Statistics (from German language, German: ', "description of a State (polity), state, a country") is the discipline that concerns the collection, organization, analysis, interpretation, and presentation of data. In applying statistics to a s ...
, the Šidák correction, or Dunn–Šidák correction, is a method used to counteract the problem of multiple comparisons. It is a simple method to control the family-wise error rate. When all null
hypotheses A hypothesis (: hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. A scientific method, scientific hypothesis must be based on observations and make a testable and reproducible prediction about reality, in a process beginning with an educ ...
are true, the method provides familywise error control that is exact for tests that are stochastically independent, conservative for tests that are positively dependent, and liberal for tests that are negatively dependent. It is credited to a 1967 paper by the
statistician A statistician is a person who works with Theory, theoretical or applied statistics. The profession exists in both the private sector, private and public sectors. It is common to combine statistical knowledge with expertise in other subjects, a ...
and probabilist Zbyněk Šidák. The Šidák method can be used to adjust alpha levels, p-values, or confidence intervals.


Usage

* Given ''m'' different null hypotheses and a familywise alpha level of \alpha, each null hypothesis is rejected that has a p-value lower than 1-(1-\alpha)^\frac . * This test produces a familywise Type I error rate of exactly \alpha when the tests are independent of each other and all null hypotheses are true. It is less stringent than the Bonferroni correction, but only slightly. For example, for \alpha = 0.05 and ''m'' = 10, the Bonferroni-adjusted level is 0.005 and the Å idák-adjusted level is approximately 0.005116. * One can also compute confidence intervals matching the test decision using the Å idák correction by computing each confidence interval at the \cdot (1 âˆ’ Î±)1/''m'' % level. Though slightly less conservative than Bonferroni, it tends to be a more conservative method of familywise error control compared to many other methods, especially when tests are positively dependent.


Proof

The Šidák correction is derived by assuming that the individual tests are independent. Let the significance threshold for each test be \alpha_1; then the probability that at least one of the tests is significant under this threshold is (1 - the probability that none of them are significant). Since it is assumed that they are independent, the probability that all of them are not significant is the product of the probability that each of them is not significant, or 1 - (1 - \alpha_1)^m. Our intention is for this probability to equal \alpha, the significance threshold for the entire series of tests. By solving for \alpha_1, we obtain \alpha_1 = 1 - (1 - \alpha)^. It shows that in order to reach a given \alpha level, we need to adapt the \alpha_1values used for each test.


Šidák correction for t-test


See also

* Multiple comparisons * Bonferroni correction * Family-wise error rate * Closed testing procedure


References


External links


The Bonferonni and Šidák Corrections for Multiple Comparisons
{{DEFAULTSORT:Sidak correction Multiple comparisons