|
Kleene's O
In set theory and computability theory, Kleene's \mathcal is a canonical subset of the natural numbers when regarded as ordinal notations. It contains ordinal notations for every computable ordinal, that is, ordinals below Church–Kleene ordinal, \omega_1^. Since \omega_1^ is the first ordinal not representable in a computable system of ordinal notations the elements of \mathcal can be regarded as the canonical ordinal notations. Kleene (1938) described a system of notation for all computable ordinals (those less than the Church–Kleene ordinal). It uses a subset of the natural numbers instead of finite strings of symbols. Unfortunately, there is in general no effective way to tell whether some natural number represents an ordinal, or whether two numbers represent the same ordinal. However, one can effectively find notations which represent the ordinal sum, product, and power (see ordinal arithmetic) of any two given notations in Kleene's \mathcal; and given any notation for an ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Set Theory
Set theory is the branch of mathematical logic that studies Set (mathematics), sets, which can be informally described as collections of objects. Although objects of any kind can be collected into a set, set theory – as a branch of mathematics – is mostly concerned with those that are relevant to mathematics as a whole. The modern study of set theory was initiated by the German mathematicians Richard Dedekind and Georg Cantor in the 1870s. In particular, Georg Cantor is commonly considered the founder of set theory. The non-formalized systems investigated during this early stage go under the name of ''naive set theory''. After the discovery of Paradoxes of set theory, paradoxes within naive set theory (such as Russell's paradox, Cantor's paradox and the Burali-Forti paradox), various axiomatic systems were proposed in the early twentieth century, of which Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (with or without the axiom of choice) is still the best-known and most studied. Set the ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Successor Ordinal
In set theory, the successor of an ordinal number ''α'' is the smallest ordinal number greater than ''α''. An ordinal number that is a successor is called a successor ordinal. The ordinals 1, 2, and 3 are the first three successor ordinals and the ordinals ω+1, ω+2 and ω+3 are the first three infinite successor ordinals. Properties Every ordinal other than 0 is either a successor ordinal or a limit ordinal.. In Von Neumann's model Using von Neumann's ordinal numbers (the standard model of the ordinals used in set theory), the successor ''S''(''α'') of an ordinal number ''α'' is given by the formula :S(\alpha) = \alpha \cup \. Since the ordering on the ordinal numbers is given by ''α'' < ''β'' if and only if ''α'' ∈ ''β'', it is immediate that there is no ordinal number between α and ''S''(''α''), and it is also clear that ''α'' < ''S''(''α''). Ordinal addition The successor operation can be used to defin ...[...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Large Countable Ordinal
In the mathematical discipline of set theory, there are many ways of describing specific countable ordinals. The smallest ones can be usefully and non-circularly expressed in terms of their Cantor normal forms. Beyond that, many ordinals of relevance to proof theory still have computable ordinal notations (see ordinal analysis). However, it is not possible to decide effectively whether a given putative ordinal notation is a notation or not (for reasons somewhat analogous to the unsolvability of the halting problem); various more-concrete ways of defining ordinals that definitely have notations are available. Since there are only countably many notations, all ordinals with notations are exhausted well below the first uncountable ordinal ω1; their supremum is called ''Church–Kleene'' ω1 or ω (not to be confused with the first uncountable ordinal, ω1), described below. Ordinal numbers below ω are the ''recursive'' ordinals (see below). Countable ordinals larger than this m ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Recursive Ordinal
In mathematics, specifically computability and set theory, an ordinal \alpha is said to be computable or recursive if there is a computable well-ordering of a computable subset of the natural numbers having the order type \alpha. It is easy to check that \omega is computable. The successor of a computable ordinal is computable, and the set of all computable ordinals is closed downwards. The supremum of all computable ordinals is called the Church–Kleene ordinal, the first nonrecursive ordinal, and denoted by \omega_1^. The Church–Kleene ordinal is a limit ordinal. An ordinal is computable if and only if it is smaller than \omega_1^. Since there are only countably many computable relations, there are also only countably many computable ordinals. Thus, \omega_1^ is countable. The computable ordinals are exactly the ordinals that have an ordinal notation in Kleene's \mathcal. See also *Arithmetical hierarchy * Large countable ordinal *Ordinal analysis In proof theory, ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Many-one Reducible
In computability theory and computational complexity theory, a many-one reduction (also called mapping reduction) is a reduction that converts instances of one decision problem (whether an instance is in L_1) to another decision problem (whether an instance is in L_2) using a computable function. The reduced instance is in the language L_2 if and only if the initial instance is in its language L_1. Thus if we can decide whether L_2 instances are in the language L_2, we can decide whether L_1 instances are in the language L_1 by applying the reduction and solving for L_2. Thus, reductions can be used to measure the relative computational difficulty of two problems. It is said that L_1 reduces to L_2 if, in layman's terms L_2 is at least as hard to solve as L_1. This means that any algorithm that solves L_2 can also be used as part of a (otherwise relatively simple) program that solves L_1. Many-one reductions are a special case and stronger form of Turing reductions. With many-one ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Analytical Hierarchy
Analytic or analytical may refer to: Chemistry * Analytical chemistry, the analysis of material samples to learn their chemical composition and structure * Analytical technique, a method that is used to determine the concentration of a chemical compound or chemical element * Analytical concentration Mathematics * Abstract analytic number theory, the application of ideas and techniques from analytic number theory to other mathematical fields * Analytic combinatorics, a branch of combinatorics that describes combinatorial classes using generating functions * Analytic element method, a numerical method used to solve partial differential equations * Analytic expression or analytic solution, a mathematical expression using well-known operations that lend themselves readily to calculation * Analytic geometry, the study of geometry based on numerical coordinates rather than axioms * Analytic number theory, a branch of number theory that uses methods from mathematical analysis M ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Recursively Enumerable Set
In computability theory, a set ''S'' of natural numbers is called computably enumerable (c.e.), recursively enumerable (r.e.), semidecidable, partially decidable, listable, provable or Turing-recognizable if: *There is an algorithm such that the set of input numbers for which the algorithm halts is exactly ''S''. Or, equivalently, *There is an algorithm that enumerates the members of ''S''. That means that its output is a list of all the members of ''S'': ''s''1, ''s''2, ''s''3, ... . If ''S'' is infinite, this algorithm will run forever, but each element of S will be returned after a finite amount of time. Note that these elements do not have to be listed in a particular way, say from smallest to largest. The first condition suggests why the term ''semidecidable'' is sometimes used. More precisely, if a number is in the set, one can ''decide'' this by running the algorithm, but if the number is not in the set, the algorithm can run forever, and no information is returned. ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Well-founded Relation
In mathematics, a binary relation is called well-founded (or wellfounded or foundational) on a set or, more generally, a class if every non-empty subset has a minimal element with respect to ; that is, there exists an such that, for every , one does not have . In other words, a relation is well-founded if: (\forall S \subseteq X)\; \neq \varnothing \implies (\exists m \in S) (\forall s \in S) \lnot(s \mathrel m) Some authors include an extra condition that is set-like, i.e., that the elements less than any given element form a set. Equivalently, assuming the axiom of dependent choice, a relation is well-founded when it contains no infinite descending chains, meaning there is no infinite sequence of elements of such that for every natural number . In order theory, a partial order is called well-founded if the corresponding strict order is a well-founded relation. If the order is a total order then it is called a well-order. In set theory, a set is called a well-fo ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Well-founded
In mathematics, a binary relation is called well-founded (or wellfounded or foundational) on a set (mathematics), set or, more generally, a Class (set theory), class if every non-empty subset has a minimal element with respect to ; that is, there exists an such that, for every , one does not have . In other words, a relation is well-founded if: (\forall S \subseteq X)\; [S \neq \varnothing \implies (\exists m \in S) (\forall s \in S) \lnot(s \mathrel m)]. Some authors include an extra condition that is Set-like relation, set-like, i.e., that the elements less than any given element form a set. Equivalently, assuming the axiom of dependent choice, a relation is well-founded when it contains no infinite descending chains, meaning there is no infinite sequence of elements of such that for every natural number . In order theory, a partial order is called well-founded if the corresponding strict order is a well-founded relation. If the order is a total order then it is called ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Computably Enumerable
In computability theory, a set ''S'' of natural numbers is called computably enumerable (c.e.), recursively enumerable (r.e.), semidecidable, partially decidable, listable, provable or Turing-recognizable if: *There is an algorithm such that the set of input numbers for which the algorithm halts is exactly ''S''. Or, equivalently, *There is an enumeration algorithm, algorithm that enumerates the members of ''S''. That means that its output is a list of all the members of ''S'': ''s''1, ''s''2, ''s''3, ... . If ''S'' is infinite, this algorithm will run forever, but each element of S will be returned after a finite amount of time. Note that these elements do not have to be listed in a particular way, say from smallest to largest. The first condition suggests why the term ''semidecidable'' is sometimes used. More precisely, if a number is in the set, one can ''decide'' this by running the algorithm, but if the number is not in the set, the algorithm can run forever, and no inf ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Limit Ordinal
In set theory, a limit ordinal is an ordinal number that is neither zero nor a successor ordinal. Alternatively, an ordinal λ is a limit ordinal if there is an ordinal less than λ, and whenever β is an ordinal less than λ, then there exists an ordinal γ such that β 0, are limits of limits, etc. Properties The classes of successor ordinals and limit ordinals (of various cofinalities) as well as zero exhaust the entire class of ordinals, so these cases are often used in proofs by transfinite induction or definitions by transfinite recursion. Limit ordinals represent a sort of "turning point" in such procedures, in which one must use limiting operations such as taking the union over all preceding ordinals. In principle, one could do anything at limit ordinals, but taking the union is continuous in the order topology and this is usually desirable. If we use the von Neumann cardinal assignment, every infinite cardinal number In mathematics, a cardinal number, or ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Partial Computable Function
Computable functions are the basic objects of study in computability theory. Informally, a function is ''computable'' if there is an algorithm that computes the value of the function for every value of its argument. Because of the lack of a precise definition of the concept of algorithm, every formal definition of computability must refer to a specific model of computation. Many such models of computation have been proposed, the major ones being Turing machines, register machines, lambda calculus and general recursive functions. Although these four are of a very different nature, they provide exactly the same class of computable functions, and, for every model of computation that has ever been proposed, the computable functions for such a model are computable for the above four models of computation. The Church–Turing thesis is the unprovable assertion that every notion of computability that can be imagined can compute only functions that are computable in the above sense. Befo ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
