|
Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986
The Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (c. 46) forms part of UK company law and sets out the procedures for company directors to be disqualified in certain cases of misconduct. History Lord Millett, in the opinion he gave in , summarized the history of disqualification orders in British company law, noting that they were originally created under s. 75 of the '' Companies Act 1928'' (subsequently consolidated as s. 275 of the '' Companies Act 1929''), which was enacted on the recommendation of the ''Report of the Company Law Amendment Committee'' (1925-1926) under the chairmanship of Mr Wilfred Greene KC (Cmd 2657). It gave the official receiver, the liquidator or any creditor or contributary the ability to apply to the court having jurisdiction to wind up the company, for an order to disqualify a director from being concerned in the management of a company for a period up to five years. Such order was up to the discretion of the court. The scope of that provision was ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
List Of Acts Of The Parliament Of The United Kingdom From 1986
Public general acts Local acts See also * List of acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom References * * * * *Halsbury's Statutes of England. Third EditionBinder 56: Continuation Binder 1986 Butterworths. London. 1987. {{UK legislation Lists of acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, 1986 ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Indictable Offence
In many common law jurisdictions (e.g. England and Wales, Ireland, Canada, Hong Kong, India, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore), an indictable offence is an offence which can only be tried on an indictment after a preliminary hearing to determine whether there is a '' prima facie'' case to answer or by a grand jury (in contrast to a summary offence). A similar concept in the United States is known as a felony, which for federal crimes, also requires an indictment. In Scotland, which is a hybrid common law jurisdiction, the procurator fiscal will commence solemn proceedings for serious crimes to be prosecuted on indictment before a jury. Australia In Australia, an indictable offence is more serious than a summary offence, and one where the defendant has the right to trial by jury. They include crimes such as murder, rape, and threatening or endangering life. The system is underpinned by various state and territory acts and the '' Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914'' ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Competition Act 1998
The Competition Act 1998 (c. 41) is the current major source of competition law in the United Kingdom, along with the Enterprise Act 2002. The act provides an updated framework for identifying and dealing with restrictive business practices and abuse of a dominant market position. One of the main purposes of this act was to harmonise the UK with EU competition policy, with Chapter I and II of the act mirroring the content of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty of Amsterdam (formally Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty of Rome).Note: Arts 81 & 81 have since been renumbered as Arts 101 & 102 Chapter I Prohibitions Deals with restrictive practices engaged by companies operating within the UK that distort, restrict or prevent competition. These are, primarily in the form of horizontal agreements (agreements to collude between firms on the same level of the supply chain such as retailers or wholesalers). These agreements could be to limit output, collusively share information, fix price ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Enterprise Act 2002
The Enterprise Act 2002 (c. 40) is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which made major changes to UK competition law with respect to mergers and also changed the law governing insolvency bankruptcy. It made cartels illegal with a maximum prison sentence of 5 years and states that level of competition in a market should be the basis for investigation. Structure *Part 1: The Office of Fair Trading (ss 1-11) *Part 2: The Competition Appeal Tribunal (ss 12-21) *Part 3: Mergers **Chapter 1: Duty to make references (ss 22-41) **Chapter 2: Public interest cases (ss 42-58) **Chapter 3: Other special cases (ss 59-70) **Chapter 4: Enforcement (ss 71-95) **Chapter 5: Supplementary (ss 96-130 *Part 4: Market Investigations **Chapter 1: Market investigation references (ss 131-138) **Chapter 2: Public interest cases **Chapter 3: Enforcement **Chapter 4: Supplementary (ss 168-184) *Part 5: The Competition Commission (ss 185-187) *Part 6: Cartel offence (ss 188-202) *Part 7: Mi ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Re Lo-Line ElectricMotors Ltd
Re or RE may refer to: Arts, media and entertainment * '' ...Re'', a 2016 Indian Kannada-language film * ''Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft'', a German encyclopedia of classical scholarship * ''Resident Evil'', a horror game franchise Music * Re, the second syllable of the scale in solfège ** D (musical note) or Re, the second note of the musical scale in ''fixed do'' solfège * Re: (band), a musical duo based in Canada and the US Albums * ''Re'' (Café Tacuba album) * ''Re'' (Les Rita Mitsouko album) * '' Re.'', by Aya Ueto * ''Re:'' (EP), by Kard Language * ''re'' (interjection), in Greek * Re (kana) (れ and レ), Japanese syllables * ''In re'', Latin for 'in the matter of...' ** RE: and Re:, a standard email subject line prefix Organisations * Renew Europe, a political group in the European Parliament * Renovación Española, a former Spanish monarchist political party * Royal Engineers, a part of the British Army * Royal Society of Painter-Pr ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Re Sevenoaks Stationers (Retail) Ltd
''Re Sevenoaks Stationers (Retail) Ltd'' 991Ch 164 is a UK company law case concerning the test of being unfit to run a company under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 section 6. Facts Mr Cruddas was a chartered accountant and director of five insolvent companies, debt amounting to £600,000. He did not keep proper accounting records, failed to ensure annual returns were filed, and that annual accounts were prepared and audited, caused more debt when he knew of severe financial difficulty, traded while insolvent, did not pay the Crown debts for PAYE, NIC and VAT. Mr Cruddas had, though, remortgaged his house to raise money to pay creditors, losing over £200K. But he only paid creditors who pressed for it. Judgment Dillon LJ held that he was unfit to be concerned with management under the CDDA 1986 section 6. He noted that this was the first case of disqualification up to the Court of Appeal. In deciding how much of 15 years to disqualify, only serious cases, wh ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Re Barings Plc (No 5)
''Re Barings plc (No 5)'' 0001 BCLC 523 is a leading UK company law case, concerning company directors' duties of care and skill. The case is formally identified and cited as "No 5", though some observers regard it as the sixth in the saga of litigation concerning Barings Bank. Facts Nick Leeson was a dishonest futures trader in Singapore for Barings Bank. He traded in the front office and also worked—in breach of internal audit recommendations—in the back office, auditing his own team's trades, effectively allowing him to act as his own supervisor. Leeson abused this situation secretly to make increasingly large unauthorized trades on his employer's behalf. He fraudulently doctored the bank's accounts, and reported large profits, while trading at a loss. After the 1995 Kobe earthquake, the stock market went into a downward spiral, and the truth of his losses was uncovered, bankrupting Barings. The Secretary of State sought director disqualification orders under the Compa ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Insolvency Act 1986
The Insolvency Act 1986 (c. 45) is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that provides the legal platform for all matters relating to personal and corporate insolvency in the UK. History The Insolvency Act 1986 followed the publication and most of the findings in the Cork Report, including the introduction of the Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA) and Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) procedures. Elements of the Act were updated by the Enterprise Act 2002, which came into effect on 1 April 2004 and introduced amongst other things the popular "out-of-court" administration route,Lyndon Norley, Kirkland & Ellis International LLP and Joseph Swanson and Peter Marshall, Houlihan Lokey (2008). A Practitioner's Guide to Corporate Restructuring. City & Financial Publishing, 1st edition and the allocation of a limited amount of funding released from assets, known as the "prescribed part", which could be made available to support ordinary unsecured creditors ahead of ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Shadow Director
A board of directors is a governing body that supervises the activities of a business, a nonprofit organization, or a government agency. The powers, duties, and responsibilities of a board of directors are determined by government regulations (including the jurisdiction's corporate law) and the organization's own constitution and by-laws. These authorities may specify the number of members of the board, how they are to be chosen, and how often they are to meet. In an organization with voting members, the board is accountable to, and may be subordinate to, the organization's full membership, which usually elect the members of the board. In a stock corporation, non-executive directors are elected by the shareholders, and the board has ultimate responsibility for the management of the corporation. In nations with codetermination (such as Germany and Sweden), the workers of a corporation elect a set fraction of the board's members. The board of directors appoints the ch ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Wrongful Trading
Wrongful trading is a type of civil wrong found in UK insolvency law, under Section 214 Insolvency Act 1986. It was introduced to enable contributions to be obtained for the benefit of creditors from those responsible for mismanagement of the insolvent company (law), company. Under Australian insolvency law the equivalent concept is called "insolvent trading". The Insolvency Act 1986 The principle of wrongful trading was introduced in the Insolvency Act 1986, to complement the concept of fraudulent trading. Unlike fraudulent trading, wrongful trading needs no finding of 'intent to defraud' (which requires a heavy burden of proof). Wrongful trading is therefore a less serious, and more common offence than fraudulent trading. Under UK insolvency law, wrongful trading occurs when the board of directors, directors of a company (law), company have continued to trade a company past the point when they: *"knew, or ought to have concluded that there was no reasonable prospect of avoidi ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |
Fraudulent Trading
In company law, fraudulent trading is doing business with intent to defraud creditors. Law Where during the course of a winding-up, it appears to the liquidator that fraudulent trading has occurred, the liquidator may apply to the court for an order any persons who were knowingly parties to the carrying on of such business are to be made liable to make such contributions (if any) to the company's assets as the court thinks proper. Conceptually, fraudulent trading is similar to a fraudulent conveyance,In the United Kingdom, see section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 but the key distinction is that an application to have a transaction set aside as a fraudulent conveyance usually requires to the third party beneficiary to disgorge the benefit of the conveyance to undo the loss to the company's assets, whereas a court order in relation to fraudulent trading it is the responsible parties (usually the directors) who must make up the loss and the third party beneficiaries will usuall ... [...More Info...] [...Related Items...] OR: [Wikipedia] [Google] [Baidu] |