HOME
TheInfoList



A green card, known officially as a permanent resident card, is an identity document which shows that a person has permanent residency in the
United States The United States of America (USA), commonly known as the United States (U.S. or US), or America, is a country Contiguous United States, primarily located in North America. It consists of 50 U.S. state, states, a Washington, D.C., federal di ...
. ("The term 'lawfully admitted for permanent residence' means the status of having been lawfully the of residing in the United States as an immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws, such status not having changed."). Green card holders are formally known as lawful permanent residents (LPRs). , there are an estimated 13.9 million green card holders of whom 9.1 million are eligible to become United States citizens. Approximately 65,000 of them serve in the U.S. Armed Forces. Green card holders are statutorily entitled to apply for U.S. citizenship after showing by a preponderance of the evidence that they, among other things, have continuously resided in the United States for at least five years and are persons of good moral character. Those who are younger than 18 years old automatically derive U.S. citizenship if they have at least one U.S. citizen parent.''Khalid v. Sessions''
904 F.3d 129
, 131 (2d Cir. 2018) (case involving a U.S. citizen in removal proceedings); ''Jaen v. Sessions''
899 F.3d 182
, 190 (2d Cir. 2018) (same); ''Anderson v. Holder''
673 F.3d 1089
, 1092 (9th Cir. 2012) (same); ''Dent v. Sessions''
900 F.3d 1075
, 1080 (9th Cir. 2018) ("An individual has third-party standing when [(1)] the party asserting the right has a close relationship with the person who possesses the right [and (2)] there is a wikt:hindrance#English, hindrance to the possessor's ability to protect his own interests.") (quoting ''List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 582, Sessions v. Morales-Santana'', 582 U.S. ___, ___
137 S.Ct. 1678
, 1689 (2017)) (internal quotation marks omitted); ''Yith v. Nielsen''
881 F.3d 1155
, 1159 (9th Cir. 2018); ''Gonzalez-Alarcon v. Macias''
884 F.3d 1266
, 1270 (10th Cir. 2018); ''Hammond v. Sessions''
No. 16-3013
, p.2-3 (2d Cir. January 29, 2018) (summary order).
The card is known as a "green card" because of its historical shades of green, greenish color. It was formerly called a "certificate of alien registration" or an "alien registration receipt card".''Campos v. United States''
888 F.3d 724
, 732 (5th Cir. 2018).
Absent exceptional circumstances#United States, exceptional circumstances, immigrants who are 18 years of age or older could spend up to 30 days in jail for not carrying their green cards. Green card lawful permanent residents (United States)#Application process, applications are decided by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), but in some cases an Immigration Judge (United States), immigration judge or a member of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), acting on behalf of the United States Attorney General, U.S. Attorney General, may grant permanent residency in the course of removal proceedings. Any jurisdiction, authorized United States federal judge, federal judge may do the same by signing and issuing an injunction. ("Limit on injunctive relief'); ''Jennings v. Rodriguez'', 583 U.S. ___, ___
138 S.Ct. 830
, 851 (2018); ''Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., Wheaton College v. Burwell''
134 S.Ct. 2806
, 2810-11 (2014) ("Under our precedents, an injunction is appropriate only if (1) it is necessary or appropriate in aid of our jurisdiction, and (2) the legal rights at issue are indisputably clear.") (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted); ''2009 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts, Lux v. Rodrigues''
561 U.S. 1306
, 1308 (2010); ''Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko''
534 U.S. 61
, 74 (2001) (stating that "injunction, injunctive relief has long been recognized as the proper means for preventing entities from acting unconstitutionally."); ''List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 556, Nken v. Holder''
556 U.S. 418
, 443 (2009) (Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Justice Samuel Alito, Alito dissenting with Justice Clarence Thomas, Thomas); see also ''Alli v. Decker''
650 F.3d 1007
, 1010-11 (3d Cir. 2011); ''Andreiu v. Ashcroft''
253 F.3d 477
, 482-85 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc).
Immigrant workers who would like to obtain a green card can apply using form I-140. An LPR could become "removable" from the United States after suffering a criminal conviction, especially if it involved a particularly serious crime or an aggravated felony "for which the term of imprisonment was completed within the previous 15 years."''Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran'', 583 U.S. ___ (2018)
Slip Opinion at 10
) (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted); see also ''Matter of Song''
27 I&N Dec. 488
, 492 (BIA 2018) ("Because the language of both the title 8 of the United States Code, statute and the title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations, regulations is plain and unambiguous, we are bound to follow it."); ''Matter of Figueroa''
25 I&N Dec. 596
, 598 (BIA 2011) ("When interpreting title 8 of the United States Code, statutes and title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations, regulations, we look first to the plain meaning of the language and are required to give effect to unambiguously expressed intent. Executive Office for Immigration Review, Executive intent is presumed to be expressed by the ordinary meaning of the words used. We also construe a statute or regulation to give effect to all of its provisions.") (citations omitted); ''List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 540, Lamie v. United States Trustee''
540 U.S. 526
, 534 (2004); ''TRW Inc. v. Andrews''
534 U.S. 19
, 31 (2001) ("It is a wikt:cardinal#English, cardinal principle of statutory interpretation, statutory construction that a statutory law, statute ought, upon the whole, to be so construed that, if it can be prevented, no clause, sentence, or word shall be superfluous, void, or insignificant.") (internal quotation marks omitted); ''List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 348, United States v. Menasche''
348 U.S. 528
, 538-539 (1955) ("It is our duty to give effect, if possible, to every clause and word of a statutory law, statute." (internal quotation marks omitted); ''NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.''
301 U.S. 1
, 30 (1937) ("The cardinal principle of statutory construction is to save and not to destroy. We have repeatedly held that as between two possible interpretations of a statute, by one of which it would be unconstitutional and by the other valid, our plain duty is to adopt that which will save the act. Even to avoid a serious doubt the rule is the same.").
Those who the Attorney General admitted to the United States as refugees and later adjustment of status, adjusted their status to that of LPRs are statutorily wikt:immunize#English, immunized against deportation for a wikt:lifetime#English, lifetime, in much the same way as those who are "national of the United States, nationals but not citizenship of the United States, citizens of the United States." (emphasis added); see also ("Nationals but not citizens...."); ("Denial of rights and privileges as national"); (a)(7) ("National refers to any individual who meets the requirements described in 8 U.S.C. 1408.").''Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez''
372 U.S. 144
, 160 (1963) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also ''Arizona v. United States''
567 U.S. 387
, 395 (2012) ("Perceived mistreatment of aliens in the United States may lead to harmful wikt:reciprocal#English, reciprocal treatment of American citizens abroad.").


History

The Immigration and Naturalization Service was formed as part of the Department of Labor in 1933, and in 1940 was moved under the Department of Justice along with the Nationality Act of 1940. During the 1940s the predecessor to the "Permanent Resident" card was the "Alien Registration Receipt Card" which on the back would indicate "Perm.Res" in accordance with the Immigration Act of 1924. The INA, which was enacted by the United States Congress, U.S. Congress in 1952, states that "[t]he term 'alien (law)#United States, alien' means any person not a citizenship of the United States, citizen or national of the United States."; see also ("The term 'national of the United States' means (A) a citizen of the United States, ''or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States''.") (emphasis added); ("The term 'wikt:permanent, permanent' means a relationship of continuing or lasting nature, as distinguished from temporary, but a relationship may be permanent even though it is one that may be dissolved eventually at the instance either of the United States or of the individual, in accordance with law."); ("The term 'residence' means the place of general dwelling, abode; the place of general abode of a person means his principal, actual dwelling place in fact, without regard to intent."); Black's Law Dictionary at p.87 (9th ed., 2009) (defining the term "permanent allegiance" as "[t]he lasting allegiance owed to [the United States] by its citizens ''or'' [permanent resident]s.") (emphasis added); ''Ricketts v. Att'y Gen.''
897 F.3d 491
, 493-94 n.3 (3d Cir. 2018) ("Citizenship and nationality are not synonymous."); ''Jennings v. Rodriguez'', 583 U.S. ___, ___-___ (2018)
138 S.Ct. 830
, 855-56 (2018) (Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Justice Clarence Thomas, Thomas concurring) ("The term 'or' is almost always logical disjunction, disjunctive, that is, the [phrase]s it connects are to be given separate meanings."); ''Chalmers v. Shalala''
23 F.3d 752
, 755 (3d Cir. 1994) (same).


Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act

On September 30, 1996, President Clinton signed into law the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA).''Othi v. Holde
734 F.3d 259
, 264-65 (4th Cir. 2013) ("In 1996, Congress 'made major changes to immigration law' via IIRIRA.... These IIRIRA changes became effective on April 1, 1997.").
As of 2014, there are approximately 13.2 million LPRs of whom 8.9 million are "eligible to naturalize." These LPRs can secure many types of jobs just like U.S. citizens can. For example, about 65,000 LPRs are members of the U.S. Armed Forces. LPRs can register property under their names and live anywhere within the United States. They can similarly operate any type of business in the United States. An LPR loses the right to become a U.S. citizen after suffering a conviction for any crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT). An LPR can even get deportation, deported from the country after suffering such a conviction, ("The term 'removable' means—(A) in the case of an alien not admitted to the United States, that the alien is inadmissible under section 1182 of this title, or (B) in the case of an alien admitted to the United States, that the alien is deportable under section 1227 of this title."); see also ''Galindo v. Sessions''
897 F.3d 894
, 897 (United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 7th Cir. 2018); ''Tima v. Att'y Gen.''
903 F.3d 272
, 277 (3d Cir. 2018) ("Section 1227 defines '[d]eportable aliens,' a synonym for removable aliens.... So § 1227(a)(1) wikt:piggyback#English, piggybacks on § 1182(a) by treating grounds of inadmissibility as grounds for removal as well.").
especially an aggravated felony "for which the term of imprisonment was completed within the previous 15 years." ("The term [aggravated felony] applies to an offense described in this paragraph ... and applies to such an offense ... for which the term of imprisonment was completed within the previous 15 years."); ''Matter of Vasquez-Muniz''
23 I&N Dec. 207
, 211 (BIA 2002) (en banc) ("This penultimate sentence, governing the enumeration of crimes in section 101(a)(43) of the Act, refers the reader to ''all'' of the crimes 'described in' the aggravated felony provision."); ''Luna Torres v. Lynch'', 578 U.S. ___, ___
136 S.Ct. 1623
, 1627 (2016) ("The whole point of § 1101(a)(43)'s penultimate sentence is to make clear that a listed offense should lead to swift removal, no matter whether it violates federal, state, or foreign law."); see also (t) ("The term aggravated felony means a crime (or a conspiracy or attempt to commit a crime) described in section 101(a)(43) of the Act. This definition is applicable to any proceeding, application, custody determination, or adjudication pending on or after September 30, 1996, but shall apply under section 276(b) of the Act only to violations of section 276(a) of the Act occurring on or after that date.") (emphasis added).
''Zivkovic v. Holder''
724 F.3d 894
, 911 (7th Cir. 2013) ("Because [Petitioner]'s aggravated felony convictions were more than a decade old before the 1988 statute took effect, they cannot be used as a ground for removal...."); ''Ledezma-Galicia v. Holder''
636 F.3d 1059
, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) ("[Petitioner] is not removable by reason of being an aggravated felon, because 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) does not apply to convictions, like [Petitioner]'s, that occurred prior to November 18, 1988."); but see ''Canto v. Holder''
593 F.3d 638
, 640-42 (7th Cir. 2010) (good example of absurdity and violation of the U.S. Constitution), ''cert. denied'', 131 S.Ct. 85 (2010) (Question Presented: "Are individuals who went to trial entitled to the same relief provided in ''Immigration and Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr, St. Cyr'' such that they may continue to seek waiver of deportation under Section 212(c) despite its repeal?
Here, p.3
, the "15 years" argument had been completely waived).
''NLRB v. SW General, Inc.'', 580 U.S. ___, ___
137 S.Ct. 929
, 939 (2017) ("The ordinary meaning of 'notwithstanding' is 'in spite of,' or 'without prevention or obstruction from or by.' In statutes, the [notwithstanding any other provision of law] 'shows which provision prevails in the event of a clash.'"); ''In re JMC Telecom LLC''
416 B.R. 738
, 743 (United States District Court for the Central District of California, C.D. Cal. 2009) (explaining that "the phrase 'notwithstanding any other provision of law' expresses the legislative intent to override all contrary statutory law, statutory and decisional law.") (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted) (emphasis added); see also ''In re Partida''
862 F.3d 909
, 912 (9th Cir. 2017) ("That is the function and purpose of the 'notwithstanding' clause."); ''Drakes Bay Oyster Co. v. Jewell''
747 F.3d 1073
, 1083 (9th Cir. 2014) ("As a general matter, 'notwithstanding' clauses wikt:nullify#English, nullify conflicting provisions of law."); ''Jones v. United States''
No. 08-645C
, p.4-5 (United States Court of Federal Claims, Fed. Cl. September 14, 2009); ''List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 558, Kucana v. Holder''
558 U.S. 233
, 238-39 n.1 (2010); ''List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 508, Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group''
508 U.S. 10
, 18 (1993) (collecting court cases).
It makes no difference if the aggravated felony was committed in Jonathan Idema, Afghanistan, Government of American Samoa, American Samoa, Crime in Australia, Australia, Crime in Canada, Canada, Crime in Mexico, Mexico, the Crime in the United Kingdom, United Kingdom, the Crime in the United States, United States, or in any other country or place in the world. After the successful elapse of such "15 years" (i.e., without sustaining a new aggravated felony conviction), a long-time LPR automatically becomes entitled to both cancellation of removal#Lawful permanent residents of the United States, cancellation of removal and a waiver of inadmissibility (United States)#Waiver of inadmissibility for people who qualify as refugees or asylum seekers, waiver of inadmissibility. Such LPR may (at any time and from anywhere in the world) request these popular immigration benefits depending on whichever is more applicable or easiest to obtain.''Salmoran v. Attorney General of the U.S.'', ___ F.3d ___, ___
No. 17-2683
, p.5 n.5 (3d Cir. November 26, 2018) (case involving cancellation of removal#Approval standard for cancellation of removal as of April 1, 1997, cancellation of removal after the LPR has been physically removed from the United States on a bogus aggravated felony charge).
''Ahmadi v. Ashcroft, et al.'', No. 03-249 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, E.D. Pa. February 19, 2003) ("Petitioner in this habeas corpus in the United States, habeas corpus proceeding, entered the United States on September 30, 1982 as a refugee from his native Democratic Republic of Afghanistan, Afghanistan. Two years later, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (the 'INS') adjustment of status, adjusted Petitioner's status to that of a lawful permanent resident.... The INS timely appealed the Immigration Judge (United States), Immigration Judge's decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals (the 'BIA').") (Michael Baylson, Baylson, District Judge); ''Ahmadi v. Att'y Gen.'', 659 F. App'x 72 (3d Cir. 2016)
Slip Opinion, pp.2, 4 n.1
) (invoking statutorily wikt:nullify, nullified wikt:case law, case law, the court dismissed an obvious miscarriage of justice, illegal deportation case by asserting that it lacks jurisdiction to review an unopposed Form N-400, United States nationality claim under and solely due to ) (non-precedential); ''Ahmadi v. Sessions'', No. 16-73974 (9th Cir. April 25, 2017) (same; unpublished single-paragraph order); ''Ahmadi v. Sessions'', No. 17-2672 (2d Cir. February 22, 2018) (same; unpublished single-paragraph order); cf. ''List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 575, United States v. Wong'', 575 U.S. ___, ___
135 S.Ct. 1625
, 1632 (2015) ("In recent years, we have repeatedly held that procedural rules, including time bars, cabin a court's power only if Congress has clearly stated as much. Absent such a clear statement, ... courts should treat the restriction as nonjurisdictional.... And in applying that clear statement rule, we have made plain that most time bars are nonjurisdictional.") (citations, internal quotation marks, and brackets omitted) (emphasis added); see also ''Bibiano v. Lynch''
834 F.3d 966
, 971 (9th Cir. 2016)
Section 1252(b)(2)
is a non-jurisdictional venue statute") (collecting cases) (emphasis added); ''Andreiu v. Ashcroft''
253 F.3d 477
, 482 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc) (the court clarified "that § 1252(f)(2)'s standard for granting injunctive relief in removal proceedings wikt:trumps#English, trumps any contrary provision elsewhere in the law.").
Those who were admitted as refugees under 8 U.S.C. § 1157(c) and later adjustment of status, adjusted to that of LPRs inside the United States are statutorily protected from deportation for lifetime. These are families, including children, who escaped from genocides and have absolutely no safe country of permanent residency, permanent residence other than the United States.See, e.g., ''Matter of Izatula''
20 I&N Dec. 149
, 154 (BIA 1990) ("Democratic Republic of Afghanistan, Afghanistan is a totalitarianism, totalitarian state under the control of the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan, [People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan], which is kept in power by the Soviet Union."); ''Matter of B-''
21 I&N Dec. 66
, 72 (BIA 1995) (en banc) ("We further find, however, that the past persecution suffered by the applicant was so severe that his asylum application should be granted notwithstanding the change of circumstances.").
See generally (stating that an LPR, especially a wrongfully deported LPR, is permitted to reenter the United States by any means whatsoever, including with a grant of "relief under sectio
1182(h)
''or'
1229b(a)
of this title 8 of the United States Code, title....") (emphasis added); accord ''United States v. Aguilera-Rios''
769 F.3d 626
, 628-29 (9th Cir. 2014) ("[Petitioner] was convicted of a California firearms offense, removed from the United States on the basis of that conviction, and, when he returned to the country, tried and convicted of illegal reentry under . He contends that his prior removal order was wikt:invalid#English, invalid because his conviction ... was not a categorical match for the Immigration and Nationality Act's ('INA') firearms offense. We agree that he was not originally removable as charged, and so could not be convicted of illegal reentry."); see also ''Matter of Campos-Torres''
22 I&N Dec. 1289
(BIA 2000) (en banc) (A firearms offense that renders an alien removable under section 237(a)(2)(C) of the Act, (Supp. II 1996), is not one 'referred to in section 212(a)(2)' and thus does not stop the further accrual of continuous residence or continuous physical presence for purposes of establishing eligibility for cancellation of removal."); ''Vartelas v. Holder''
566 U.S. 257
, 262 (2012).
This legal finding is supported by latest precedents of all the United States courts of appeals, U.S. courts of appeals and the BIA,''Matter of Campos-Torres''
22 I&N Dec. 1289
(BIA 2000) (en banc) ("Pursuant to section 240A(d)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, (Supp. II 1996), an offense must be one 'referred to in section 212(a)(2)' of the Act, (1994 & Supp. II 1996), to terminate the period of continuous residence or continuous physical presence required for cancellation of removal."); see also ''Nguyen v. Sessions'', __ F.3d __
No. 17-70251
(9th Cir. August 23, 2018); ''Lopez v. Sessions'', ___ F.3d ___, ___
No. 15-72747
, p.13 (9th Cir. August 22, 2018) (clarifying that "the structure and text of the statute indicate that the fact of conviction (not the underlying conduct) is the relevant transaction for purposes of the retroactivity analysis."); ''Esquivel v. Lynch''
803 F.3d 699
, 701 (5th Cir. 2015); ''Calix v. Lynch''
784 F.3d 1000
, 1011-12 (5th Cir. 2015); ''Jaghoori v. Holder''
772 F.3d 764
(4th Cir. 2014); ''Jeudy v. Holder''
768 F.3d 595
(7th Cir. 2014); ''Sinotes-Cruz v. Gonzales''
468 F.3d 1190
(9th Cir. 2006).
''Smriko v. Ashcroft''
387 F.3d 279
, 287 (3d Cir. 2004) (explaining that the idea of refugees being admitted to the United States as lawful permanent residents was intentionally rejected by the United States congressional conference committee, U.S. Congressional Conference Committee); H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 96-781, at 21 (1980), ''reprinted in'' 1980 U.S.C.C.A.N. 160, 162.
which are wikt:binding#English, binding on all immigration officials. See also (g) ("Decisions as precedents.") (eff. 2018); ''Citizens United v. FEC''
558 U.S. 310
, 362 (2010) ("Our precedent is to be respected unless the most convincing of reasons demonstrates that adherence to it puts us on a course that is sure error."); ''Al-Sharif v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services''
734 F.3d 207
, 212 (3d Cir. 2013) (en banc) (same); ''Miller v. Gammie''
335 F.3d 889
, 899 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (same).
These refugees have already "been lawfully accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States" by the Attorney General, but decades later the immigration officers constitutionality#Unconstitutional laws in the United States, unconstitutionally turned these ''third country resettlement, firmly resettled'' Americans into refugees again.See generally ''Hanna v. Holder''
740 F.3d 379
(6th Cir. 2014) (discussing firm resettlement); ''Matter of A-G-G-''
25 I&N Dec. 486
(BIA 2011) (same).
''Matter of B-R-''
26 I&N Dec. 119
, 122 (BIA 2013) ("The core regulatory purpose of asylum in the United States, asylum . . . is . . . to protect refugees with nowhere else to turn.") (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted).
Unlike other aliens in removal proceedings, the refugees obviously owe wikt:permanent#English, permanent allegiance solely to the government of the United States. This makes them nothing but a distinct class of persecution, persecuted Americans. ("The term 'refugee' means (A) ''any person who is'' outside any country of such person's nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, is ''outside any country in which such person last habitually resided'', and who is unable ... to return to, and is unable ... to avail himself ... of the protection of, that country because of persecution ... on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion....") (emphasis added); ''Mashiri v. Ashcroft''
383 F.3d 1112
, 1120 (9th Cir. 2004) ("Persecution may be emotional or psychological, as well as physical.").
See generally ''Matter of Smriko''
23 I&N Dec. 836
(BIA 2005) (a cursory opinion of a three-member panel blatantly persecution, persecuting refugees and depriving them of human rights in the United States, rights); ''Maiwand v. Gonzales''
501 F.3d 101
, 106-07 (2d Cir. 2007) (same); ''Romanishyn v. Att'y Gen.''
455 F.3d 175
(3d Cir. 2006) (same); ''Kaganovich v. Gonzales''
F.3d 894
(9th Cir. 2006) (same).
The ones who are denied U.S. citizenship are statutorily allowed to live in the United States with their American families for the rest of their life.''Matter of H-N-''
22 I&N Dec. 1039
, 1040-45 (Board of Immigration Appeals, BIA 1999) (en banc) (case of a female Cambodian Americans, Cambodian-American who was convicted of a particularly serious crime but "the Immigration Judge (United States), Immigration Judge found [her] eligible for a waiver of inadmissibility (United States), waiver of inadmissibility, as well as for adjustment of status, and he granted her this relief from removal."); ''Matter of Jean''
23 I&N Dec. 373
, 381 (United States Attorney General, A.G. 2002) ("Aliens, like the respondent, who have been admitted (or conditionally admitted) into the United States as refugees can seek an adjustment of status only under INA § 209."); INA § 209(c), ("The provisions of paragraphs (4), (5), and (7)(A) of section 1182(a) of title 8 of the United States Code, this title shall not be applicable to any alien seeking adjustment of status unde
this section
, and the United States Secretary of Homeland Security, Secretary of Homeland Security or the United States Attorney General, Attorney General may waive any other provision of [section 1182] ... with respect to such an alien for wikt:humanitarian#English, humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, ''or'' when it is otherwise in the public interest.") (emphasis added); ''Nguyen v. Chertoff''
501 F.3d 107
, 109-10 (2d Cir. 2007) (petition granted of a Vietnamese Americans, Vietnamese-American convicted of a particularly serious crime); ''City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.''
473 U.S. 432
, 439 (1985) ("The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment commands that ... all persons similarly situated should be treated alike.").
''Matter of J-H-J-''
26 I&N Dec. 563
(Board of Immigration Appeals, BIA 2015) (collecting court cases) ("An alien who adjustment of status, adjusted status in the United States, and who has not entered as a lawful permanent resident, is not barred from establishing eligibility for a waiver of inadmissibility (United States), waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, (2012), as a result of an aggravated felony conviction.") (emphasis added); see also ''De Leon v. Lynch''
808 F.3d 1224
, 1232 (United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 10th Cir. 2015) ("[Petitioner] next claims that even if he is removable, he should nevertheless have been afforded the opportunity to apply for a waiver under . Under controlling precedent from our court and the Board of Immigration Appeals, BIA's recent decision in ''Matter of J–H–J–'', he is correct.") (emphasis added).
''Al-Sharif v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services''
734 F.3d 207
(3d Cir. 2013) (en banc) (holding that an LPR convicted of an aggravated felony cannot obtain U.S. citizenship); see also ''Mobin v. Taylor''
598 F.Supp.2d 777
(United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, E.D. Va. 2009) (same).
Deporting such Americans shocks the conscience because it is plainly unconstitutional and a particularly serious crime, grave international crime. In 2009, Congress enacted 18 U.S.C. § 249 ("Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, Hate crime acts"), which warns the public and every government official by expressly stating the following: LPRs are also subject to similar obligations as U.S. citizens. For example, male LPRs between the ages of 18 and 25 are subject to registering in the Selective Service System. Like U.S. citizens, LPRs must pay taxation in the United States, taxes on their worldwide income (this includes filing annual U.S. income tax returns). LPRs are not permitted to vote in federal elections and they cannot be elected to federal office. They may right of foreigners to vote in the United States, vote in certain local elections, and hold local and state offices (subject to state/city law and Constitutionality). An LPR can file an Form N-400, application for naturalization after five years of continuous residency in the United States. ("Requirements of naturalization"); see also ; * * This period may be shortened to three years if married to a U.S. citizen or during service with the U.S. armed forces. An LPR may submit his or her applications for naturalization as early as 90 days before meeting the residency requirement. In addition to continuous residency, the applicants must demonstrate good moral character, pass both an English test and a civics test, and demonstrate attachment to the Constitution of the United States, U.S. Constitution. In the summer of 2018, a new program was initiated to help LPRs prepare themselves for naturalization. Like U.S. citizens, LPRs can sponsor certain family members to immigrate to the United States, but the number of family members of LPRs who can immigrate is limited by an annual cap, and there is a years-long backlog.


2019 "public charge" restrictions on awarding Green cards

On August 12, 2019, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) formally announced a new rule restricting poorer immigrants from attaining LPR status, popularly known as a Green Card. Under the rule, which was slated to take effect on October 15, 2019, legal immigrants who have received public benefits such as Supplemental Security Income, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Medicaid, and public housing assistance for more than a total of twelve months may be classified as a "public charge" ineligible for permanent residency. Immigration official may investigate the health, income, wealth, education, and family of applicants for permanent residency to predict whether they will become a public charge in the future. The term "public charge" appears in the Immigration and Nationality Act, but is not defined by the law. Refugees, asylum seekers, pregnant women, children, and family members of those serving in the Armed Forces are excluded from the restrictions. The Trump administration estimated that 58% of households headed by non-citizens use a public welfare program and half use Medicaid. The Migration Policy Institute estimated that half of all Green Card applicants would be excluded by the rule. Ken Cuccinelli, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, the former acting director of USCIS, stated the policy will "have the long-term benefit of protecting taxpayers by ensuring people who are immigrating to this country don’t become public burdens, that they can stand on their own two feet, as immigrants in years past have done." The National Immigration Law Center stated that the rule "will have a dire humanitarian impact, forcing some families to forgo critical lifesaving health care and nutrition. The damage will be felt for decades to come." The law center announced it would sue to prevent the policy from taking effect. During his campaign for President of the United States, Joe Biden criticized the Public Charge rule and pledged to revoke it. On February 2, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security review the policy, amongst others.


Types of immigration

A foreign national may obtain permanent residency in the United States primarily through the following: *Sponsorship by a family member *Special employment *Major investment (minimum $900,000) *Diversity Immigrant Visa, Diversity Lottery *Referred by the UNHCR as a refugee (or request asylum in the United States).


Immigration eligibility and quotas


Application process

Applications for permanent resident cards (green cards) were decided by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) until 2003 when the INS was abolished and replaced by the current United States Department of Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The whole process may take several years, depending on the type of immigrant category and the foreign state of chargeability, country of chargeability. An immigrant usually has to go through a three-step process to get permanent residency: #Immigrant petition (Form I-140 or Form I-130) – in the first step, USCIS approves the immigrant petition by a qualifying relative, an employer, or in rare cases, such as with an investor visa, the applicant himself. If a sibling is applying, she or he must have the same parents as the applicant. #Immigrant visa availability – in the second step, unless the applicant is an "immediate relative", an immigrant visa number through the National Visa Center (NVC) of the United States Department of State (DOS) must be available. A visa number might not be immediately available even if the USCIS approves the petition, because the number of immigrant visa numbers is limited every year by quotas set in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). There are also certain additional limitations by country of chargeability. Thus, most immigrants will be placed on lengthy waiting lists. Those immigrants who are immediate relatives of a U.S. citizen (spouses and children under 21 years of age, and parents of a U.S. citizen who is 21 years of age or older) are not subject to these quotas and may proceed to the next step immediately, since they qualify for the IR immigrant category. #Immigrant visa adjudication – in the third step, when an immigrant visa number becomes available, the applicant must either apply with USCIS to adjust their current status to permanent resident status or apply with the DOS for an immigrant visa at the nearest U.S. consulate before being allowed to come to the United States. #*Adjustment of status (AOS) – Adjustment of status is for when the immigrant is in the United States and entered the U.S. legally. Except for immediate relatives of U.S. citizens, the immigrant must also be in legal status at the time of applying for adjustment of status. For immediate relatives and other relative categories whose visa numbers are current, adjustment of status can be filed for at the same time with the petition (step 1 above). Adjustment of status is submitted to USCIS via Adjustment of status, form I-485, ''Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status''. The USCIS conducts a series of background checks, including fingerprinting for FBI criminal background check and name checks, and makes a decision on the application. Once the adjustment of status application is accepted, the alien is allowed to stay in the United States even if the original period of authorized stay on the Form I-94 is expired, but he or she is generally not allowed to leave the country until the application is approved, or the application will be abandoned. If the alien has to leave the United States during this time, he or she can apply for travel documents at the USCIS with Advance parole, form I-131, also called ''Advance parole''. If there is a potential risk that the applicant's work permit (visa) will expire or become invalid, such as when employees are laid off by the employer and visa sponsor, or the applicant wants to start working in the United States, while he or she is waiting for the decision about his or her application to change status, he or she can file Employment authorization document, form I-765, to get ''Employment authorization document, Employment Authorization Documents'' (also called ''EAD'') and be able to continue or start working legally in the United States. In some cases, the applicant will be interviewed at a USCIS office, especially if it is a marriage-based adjustment from a K-1 visa, in which case both spouses (the US citizen and the applicant) will be interviewed by the USCIS. If the application is approved, the alien becomes an LPR, and the actual green card is mailed to the alien's last known mailing address. #*Consular processing – This is the process if the immigrant is outside the United States, or is ineligible for AOS. It still requires the immigrant visa petition to be first completed and approved. The applicant may make an appointment at the U.S. embassy or consulate in his or her home country, where a consular officer adjudicates the case. If the case is approved, an immigrant visa is issued by the U.S. embassy or consulate. The visa entitles the holder to travel to the United States as an immigrant. At the port of entry, the immigrant visa holder immediately becomes a permanent resident, and is processed for a permanent resident card and receives an I-551 stamp in his or her passport. The permanent resident card is mailed to his or her U.S. address within 120 days. An applicant in the United States can obtain two permits while the case is pending after a certain stage is passed in green card processing (filing of I-485). * The first is a temporary work permit known as the Employment Authorization Document (EAD), which allows the alien to take employment in the United States. * The second is a temporary travel document, advance parole, which allows the alien to re-enter the United States. Both permits confer benefits that are independent of any existing status granted to the alien. For example, the alien might already have permission to work in the United States under an H-1B visa.


Application process for family-sponsored visa for both parents and for children

U.S. citizens may sponsor for permanent residence in the United States the following relatives: #Spouses, and unmarried children under the age of 21; #Parents (once the U.S. citizen is at least 21 years old); #Unmarried children over the age of 21 (called "sons and daughters"); #Married sons and daughters; #Brothers and sisters (once the U.S. citizen is at least 21 years old). U.S. permanent residents may sponsor for permanent residence in the United States the following relatives: #Spouses, and unmarried children under the age of 21; #Unmarried children over the age of 21 (called "sons and daughters"); The Department of State's "Visa Bulletin," issued every month, gives the priority date for those petition beneficiaries currently entitled to apply for immigrant status through immigrant visas or adjustment of status. There is no annual quota for the spouses, unmarried children, and parents of U.S. citizens, so there is no waiting period for these applicants—just the required processing time. However, all other family-based categories have significant backlogs, even with a U.S. citizen petitioner. Regardless of whether the family member being sponsored is located in the United States (and therefore likely to be applying for adjustment of status) or outside the United States (in which case the immigrant visa is the likely option), the process begins with the filing of an I-130 Petition for Alien Relative. The form and instructions can be found on the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website. Required later in the process will be additional biographic data regarding the beneficiary (the person being sponsored) and a medical examination. Additional documents, such as police certificates, may be required depending on whether immigrant visa (consular processing) or adjustment of status is being utilized. All petitioners must supply the I-864 Affidavit of Support.


Green-card holders and families

Green-card holders married to non-U.S. citizens are able to legally bring their spouses and minor children to join them in the US, but must wait for their priority date to become current. The foreign spouse of a green-card holder must wait for approval of an "immigrant visa" from the State Department before entering the United States. Due to numerical limitation on the number of these visas, the wait time for approval may be months or years. In the interim, the spouse cannot be legally present in the United States, unless he or she secures a visa by some other means. Green-card holders may opt to wait to become U.S. citizens, and only then sponsor their spouses and children, as the process is much faster for U.S. citizens. However, many green-card holders can choose to apply for the spouse or children and update their application after becoming a U.S. citizen. U.S. green-card holders have experienced separation from their families, sometimes for years. A mechanism to unite families of green-card holders was created by the LIFE Act by the introduction of a "V visa", signed into law by Bill Clinton, President Clinton. The law expired on December 31, 2000, and V visas are no longer available. Several bills have been introduced in Congress to reinstate V visas, but so far none have been successful.


Improving the application process in obtaining a green card

The most common challenges that USCIS faces in providing services in the green card process are: (1) the length of the application and approval process, and (2) the quotas of green cards granted. USCIS tries to shorten the time qualified applicants wait to receive permanent residence.


=Challenges with processing time of application

= Under the current system, immediate family members (spouse, child, and dependent mother and father), have priority status for green cards and generally wait 6 months to a year to have their green card application approved. For non-immediate family members, the process may take up to 10 years. Paperwork is processed on a first-come, first-served basis, so new applications may go untouched for several months. To address the issue of slow processing times, USCIS has made a policy allowing applicants to submit the I-130 and I-485 forms at the same time. This has reduced the processing time. Another delay in the process comes when applications have mistakes. In these cases papers are sent back to the applicant, further delaying the process. Currently the largest cause of long wait times is not processing time, but rather immigrant visa quotas set by Congress.


=Quota system challenges

= Because of numerical quotas in many immigration categories, long wait times often prevent immigrants from receiving immigrant visas in a short time frame. The ''Augusta Chronicle'' in 2006 stated that an estimated two million people are on waiting lists in anticipation to become legal and permanent residents of the United States. Immigrants need visas to get off of these waiting lists, and Congress would need to change immigration law in order to accommodate them with legal status. The number of green cards that can be granted to family-based applicants depends on what preference category they fall under. An unlimited number of immediate relatives can receive green cards because there is no quota for that category. Family members who fall under the other various preference categories have fixed quotas; however, the number of visas issued from each category may vary because unused visas from one category may roll over into another category.


Application process for employment-based visa

Many immigrants opt for this route, which typically requires an employer to "sponsor" (i.e., to petition before USCIS) the immigrant (known as the ''alien beneficiary'') through a presumed future job (in some special categories, the applicant may apply on his/her behalf without a sponsor). The three-step process outlined above is described here in more detail for employment-based immigration applications. After the process is complete, the alien is expected to take the certified job offered by the employer to substantiate his or her immigrant status, since the application ultimately rests on the alien's employment with that company in that particular position. #Immigrant petition – the first step includes the pre-requisite labor certification upon which the actual petition will reside. #*Labor certification – the employer must legally prove that it has a need to hire an alien for a specific position and that there is no minimally qualified U.S. citizen or LPR available to fill that position, hence the reason for hiring the alien. Some of the requirements to prove this situation include: proof of advertising for the specific position; skill requirements particular to the job; verification of the prevailing wage for a position; and the employer's ability to pay. This is currently done through an electronic system known as PERM, labor certification, PERM. The date when the labor certification application is filed becomes the applicant's ''priority date''. In some cases, for highly skilled foreign nationals (EB1 and EB2 ''National Interest Waiver'', e.g. researchers, athletes, artists or business executives) and "Schedule A" labor (nurses and physical therapists), this step is waived. This step is processed by the United States Department of Labor (DOL). The labor certification is valid for 6 months from the time it is approved. #*Immigrant petition – the employer applies on the alien's behalf to obtain a visa number. The application is form I-140, ''Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker'', and it is processed by the USCIS. There are several EB (''employment-based'') immigrant categories (i.e., EB1-EA, EB2-NIW, EB5) under which the alien may apply, with progressively stricter requirements, but often shorter waiting times. Many of the applications are processed under the EB3 category. Currently, this process takes up to 6 months. Many of the EB categories allow expedited processing of this stage, known as "premium processing". #Immigrant visa availability. When the immigrant petition is approved by the USCIS, the petition is forwarded to the NVC for visa allocation. Currently this step centers around the priority date concept. #*Priority date – the visa becomes available when the applicant's ''priority date'' is earlier than the ''cutoff date'' announced on the DOS's Visa Bulletin or when the immigrant visa category the applicant is assigned to is announced as "current". A "current" designation indicates that visa numbers are available to all applicants in the corresponding immigrant category. Petitions with priority dates earlier than the cutoff date are expected to have visas available, therefore those applicants are eligible for final adjudication. When the NVC determines that a visa number could be available for a particular immigrant petition, a visa is tentatively allocated to the applicant. The NVC will send a letter stating that the applicant may be eligible for adjustment of status, and requiring the applicant to choose either to adjust status with the USCIS directly, or apply at the U.S. consulate abroad. This waiting process determines when the applicant can expect the immigration case to be adjudicated. Due to quotas imposed on EB visa categories, there are more approved immigrant petitions than visas available under INA. High demand for visas has created a backlog of approved but unadjudicated cases. In addition, due to processing inefficiencies throughout DOS and USCIS systems, not all visas available under the quota system in a given year were allocated to applicants by the DOS. Since there is no quota carry-over to the next fiscal year, for several years visa quotas have not been fully used, thus adding to the visa backlog. #Immigrant visa adjudication. When the NVC determines that an immigrant visa is available, the case can be adjudicated. If the alien is already in the US, that alien has a choice to finalize the green card process via adjustment of status in the U.S., or via consular processing abroad. If the alien is outside of the United States he or she can only apply for an immigrant visa at the U.S. consulate. The USCIS does not allow an alien to pursue consular processing and AOS simultaneously. Prior to filing the form I-485 (Adjustment of Status) it is required that the applicant have a ''medical examination'' performed by a USCIS-approved civil surgeon. The examination includes a blood test and specific immunizations, unless the applicant provides proof that the required immunizations were already done elsewhere. The civil surgeon hands the applicant a sealed envelope containing a completed form I-693, which must be included unopened with the I-485 application. The USCIS website also states that the February 25, 2010 edition of the Form I-693 reflects that an individual should no longer be tested for HIV infection. #*Adjustment of status (AOS) – after the alien has a labor certification and has been provisionally allocated a visa number, the final step is to change his or her status to permanent residency. Adjustment of status is submitted to USCIS via form I-485, ''Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status''. If an immigrant visa number is available, the USCIS will allow ''"concurrent filing"'': it will accept forms I-140 and I-485 submitted in the same package or will accept form I-485 even before the approval of the I-140. #*Consular processing – this is an alternative to AOS, but still requires the immigrant visa petition to be completed. Prior to 2005, this process was somewhat faster than applying for AOS, so was sometimes used to circumvent long backlogs (of over two years in some cases). However, due to recent efficiency improvements by the USCIS, it is not clear whether applying via consular processing is faster than the regular AOS process. Consular processing is also thought to be riskier since there is no or very little recourse for appeal if the officer denies the application.


Green card lottery

Each year, around 50,000 immigrant visas are made available through the Diversity Visa (DV) program, also known as the Green Card Lottery to people who were born in countries with low rates of immigration to the United States (fewer than 50,000 immigrants in the past five years). Applicants can only qualify by country of chargeability, not by citizenship. Anyone who is selected under this lottery will be given the opportunity to apply for permanent residence. They can also file for their spouse and any unmarried children under the age of 21. If permanent residence is granted, the winner (and his/her family, if applicable) receives an immigrant visa in their passport(s) that has to be "activated" within six months of issuance at any port of entry to the United States. If already in the U.S. adjustment of status may be pursued. The new immigrant receives a stamp on the visa as proof of lawful admittance to the United States, and the individual is now authorized to live and work permanently in the United States. Finally, the actual "green card" typically arrives by mail within a few months.


Crime: green card lottery scam

There is a growing number of fraudulent green card lottery Confidence trick, scams, in which false agents take money from applicants by promising to submit application forms for them. Most agents are not working for the distribution service. Some claim that they can increase the chance of winning the lottery, when in fact, they may delay or not submit the application. Likewise, some claim to provide to winners free airline tickets or other benefits, such as submissions in future years or cash funds. There is no way to guarantee their claims, and there are numerous nefarious reasons for them not to fulfill their promises. Applicants are advised to use only official U.S. government websites, in which the URL ends in .gov.


Green card lottery e-mail fraud

Other fraud perpetrators will e-mail potential victims posing as State Department or other government officials with requests to wire or transfer money online as part of a "processing fee." These fraudulent e-mails are designed to steal money from unsuspecting victims. The senders often use illegitimate e-mail addresses and logos designed to make them look more like official government correspondence. One easy way to tell that an email is a fraud is that it does not end with a ".gov". One particularly common fraud email asks potential victims to wire money via Western Union to an individual (the name varies) at the following address in the United Kingdom: 24 Grosvenor Square, London. These emails come from a variety of email addresses designed to impersonate the U.S. State Department. The USCIS blog has published information on this email scam and how to report fraudulent emails to the authorities. The U.S. government has issued warnings about this type of fraud or similar business practices.


Registry

The "registry" is a provision of the INA which allows an alien who has previously entered the United States illegally to obtain legal permanent residence simply on the basis of having de facto resided in the country over a very long time. To avail himself of the benefit of this provision, the alien has to prove that he has continuously resided since before the stipulated "registry date". The concept of "registry" was first added to the INA in 1929, with the registry date set to June 3, 1921. Since then, the registry date has been adjusted several times, being set to July 1, 1924; June 28, 1940; and June 30, 1948. The most recent adjustment to the registry date came with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, when it was set to January 1, 1972. A number of bills have been introduced in Congress since then to further alter the registry date, but they have not been passed.


Inadmissibility Based on Political Affiliation

On October 2, 2020, the USCIS declared the inadmissibility based on belonging or affiliation to Communist party, Communist parties or any, unspecified, "totalitarian party". Membership or affiliation with such parties, whether US or foreign, would be incompatible with the oath of allegiance to the naturalization of the United States of America, which includes a commitment to "support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States". Exceptions to the inadmissibility rule include circumstances where membership is: "Involuntary; Solely when under 16 years of age; By operation of law; or For purposes of obtaining employment, food rations, or other essentials of living and where necessary for such purposes."


Rights and responsibilities of a lawful permanent resident

Lawful permanent residents, also known as green card holders, have certain rights and responsibilities as highlighted by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and other federal agencies.


Rights

* Reside permanently in the United States provided they do not commit actions that would make them removable under the INA. * Join and serve in the United States Armed Forces, including in many law enforcement in the United States, law enforcement agencies. * Work anywhere in the United States (with the exception of many federal jobs and some companies under contract by the federal government). * Be protected equally by the law of the United States, their U.S. state, State of residence, and local jurisdictions. * Travel freely outside the United States for up to one year as a tourist. * Petition for (or sponsor) certain family members to immigrate to the United States as lawful permanent residents. Such family members include spouse and unmarried children of any age.


Responsibilities

* Required to obey all laws of the United States, including state laws, and localities. * Required to file income tax in the United States, income tax returns and report income to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and state taxing authorities. * Register with the Selective Service System (if male and aged 18 through 25).


Conditional permanent residents

As part of immigration reform under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), as well as further reform enacted in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), eligible persons who properly apply for permanent residency based on either a recent marriage to a U.S. citizen or as an investor are granted such privilege only on a conditional basis, for two years. An exception to this rule is the case of a U.S. citizen legally sponsoring a spouse in which the marriage at the time of the adjustment of status (I-485) is more than two years old. In this case, the conditional status is waived and a 10-year "permanent resident card" is issued after the USCIS approves the case. A permanent resident under the conditional clause may receive an I-551 stamp as well as a permanent resident card. The expiration date of the conditional period is two years from the approval date. The immigrant visa category is CR (conditional resident). When this two-year conditional period is over, the permanent residence automatically expires and the applicant is subject to deportation and removal unless, up to 90 days before the conditional residence expires, the applicant must file form I-751 ''Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence'' (if conditional permanent residence was obtained through marriage) or form I-829 ''Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Conditions'' (if conditional permanent residence was obtained through investment) with USCIS to have the conditions removed. Once the application is received, permanent residence is extended in 1-year intervals until the request to remove conditions is approved or denied. For conditional permanent residence obtained through marriage, both spouses must sign the form I-751; if the spouses are divorced, it is possible to get a waiver of the other spouse's signing requirement, if it can be proved that the marriage was bona fide. The USCIS requires that the application for the removal of conditions provide both general and specific supporting evidence that the basis on which the applicant obtained conditional permanent residence was not fraudulent. For an application based on marriage, birth certificates of children, joint financial statements, and letters from employers, friends and relatives are some types of evidence that may be accepted. That is to ensure that the marriage was in good faith and not a fraudulent marriage of convenience with a sole intention of obtaining a green card. A follow-up interview with an immigration officer is sometimes required but may be waived if the submitted evidence is sufficient. Both the spouses must usually attend the interview. The applicant receives an I-551 stamp in their foreign passport upon approval of their case. The applicant is then free from the conditional requirement once the application is approved. The applicant's new permanent resident card arrives via mail to their house several weeks to several months later and replaces the old two-year conditional residence card. The new card must be renewed after 10 years, but permanent resident status is now granted for an indefinite term if residence conditions are satisfied at all times. The USCIS may request to renew the card earlier because of security enhancements of the card or as a part of a revalidation campaign to exclude counterfeit green cards from circulation. The two-year conditional residence period counts toward satisfying a residency requirement for U.S. naturalization, and other purposes. Application for the removal of conditions must be adjudicated before a separate naturalization application could be reviewed by the USCIS on its own merits.


Differences between permanent residents and conditional permanent residents

Conditional permanent residents have all of the equal "rights, privileges, responsibilities and duties which apply to all other lawful permanent residents." The only difference is the requirement to satisfy the conditions (such as showing marriage status or satisfying entrepreneur requirements) before the two-year period ends.


Abandonment or loss of permanent residence status

A green-card holder may abandon permanent residence by filing form I-407, with the green card, at a U.S. Embassy. Under certain conditions, permanent residence status can be lost involuntarily. This includes committing a criminal act that makes a person removable from the United States. A person might also be found to have abandoned his/her status if he or she moves to another country to live there permanently, stays outside the US for more than 365 days (without getting a U.S. Re-entry Permit, re-entry permit before leaving), or does not file an Income tax in the United States, income tax return on their worldwide income. Permanent resident status can also be lost if it is found that the application or grounds for obtaining permanent residence was fraudulent. The failure to renew the permanent resident card does not result in the loss of status, except in the case of conditional permanent residents as noted above. Nevertheless, it is still a good idea to renew the green card on time because it also acts as a work permit and travel permit (advance parole), but if the green card is renewed late, there is no penalty or extra fee to pay. A person who loses permanent residence status is immediately removable from the
United States The United States of America (USA), commonly known as the United States (U.S. or US), or America, is a country Contiguous United States, primarily located in North America. It consists of 50 U.S. state, states, a Washington, D.C., federal di ...
and must leave the country as soon as possible or face deportation and removal. In some cases the person may be banned from entering the country for three or seven years, or even moral turpitude, permanently.


Tax costs of green card relinquishment

Due to the expatriation tax, Heart Act foreign workers who have owned a green card in eight of the last 15 years and choose to relinquish it will be subject to the expatriation tax, which taxes unrealized gains above $600,000, anywhere in the world. However this will only apply to those people who have a federal tax liability greater than $139,000 a year or have a worth of more than $2 million or have failed to certify to the IRS that they have been in compliance with U.S. federal tax obligations for the past five years. If the green card is not relinquished, then the holder is subject to Double taxation#U.S. Citizens and Resident Aliens Abroad, double taxation when living or working outside of the United States, whether or not within their home nation, although double taxation may be mitigated by foreign tax credits.


Reading a permanent resident card

While most of the information on the card is self-evident, the computer- and human-readable signature at the bottom is not. The format follows the Machine-readable passport#Official travel documents, machine-readable travel document TD1 format: * First line: :1–2: C1 or C2. C1 = resident within the United States, C2 = permanent resident commuter (living in Canada or Mexico) :3–5: USA (issuing country, United States) :6–14: 9-digit number (A#, alien number) :15: check digit over digits 6–14 :16–30: 13-character USCIS receipt number, padded with "<" as a filler character * Second line: :1–6: birth date (in YYMMDD format) :7: check digit over digits 1–6 :8: gender :9–14: expiration date (in YYMMDD format) :15: check digit over digits 9–14 :16–29: country of birth :30: cumulative check digit (over digits 6–30 (upper line), 1–7, 9–15, 19–29 (lower line)) * Third line: :surname, given name, middle name, first initial of father, first initial of mother (this line is spaced with "<<" between the surname and given name). Depending on the length of the name, the father's and mother's initials may be omitted. A full list of category codes (i.e. IR1, E21, etc.) can be found in the ''Federal Register'' or Foreign Affairs Manual. Since May 11, 2010, new green cards contain an RFID chip and can be electronically accessed at a distance. They are shipped with a protective sleeve intended to protect the card from remote access, but it is reported to be inadequate.


Visa-free travel for U.S. permanent residents

The following countries and territories generally allow U.S. permanent residents to enter the country without a visa for purposes of tourism. * : 90 days within 180 days * : 30 days * : 30 days * : permanent residents of the USA can obtain a visa on arrival, provided prior approval is obtained from Belizean Immigration (fee US$50). Visitors may also have to pay a repatriation fee. * * : 90 days within 180 days * : 1 month * : 6 months ETA required for travel by air * : 30 days * : 30 days * : 6 months * : 30 days * (Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten, Caribbean Netherlands): 30 days * : 90 days within 180 days * : 90 days * : 90 days * : 90 days * : 15 days * : 180 days * : 30 days * : 3 months * : 90 days * : 90 daysTravel to Serbia
". ''Embassy of the Republic of Serbia in Washington, D.C.'' Retrieved February 8, 2019. "Foreign nationals who have a valid US visa or lawful residence in the United States (green card) may enter the Republic of Serbia without visas and stay no longer than 90 days within six month period. Visa must be valid for the whole duration of stay in the Republic of Serbia."
* : 30 days max. for holders of a ROC (Taiwan) Business and Academic Travel Card, issued by Republic of China (Taiwan). * : 30 days


See also

*Blue Card (European Union) *Indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom *Permanent residency in Canada *Permanent residency *Green card marriage


References

''This article in most part is based on law of the United States, including statutory law, statutory and precedent, published case law.''


External links


Green Card
{{DEFAULTSORT:Americans History of immigration to the United States American people Immigration to the United States International travel documents Identity documents of the United States Residency United States immigration law Immigration documents 1940s establishments in the United States 1940s introductions Residence permit