Avoiding harm
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In law, void means of no legal effect. An action, document, or transaction which is void is of no legal effect whatsoever: an absolute nullity—the law treats it as if it had never existed or happened. The term void ''ab initio'', which means "to be treated as invalid from the outset", comes from adding the Latin phrase ''ab initio'' (from the beginning) as a qualifier. For example, in many jurisdictions where a person signs a contract under duress, that contract is treated as being void ''ab initio''. The frequent combination "null and void" is a legal doublet. The term is frequently used in contradistinction to the term " voidable" and " unenforceable".


Definitions

''
Black's Law Dictionary ''Black's Law Dictionary'' is the most frequently used legal dictionary in the United States. Henry Campbell Black (1860–1927) was the author of the first two editions of the dictionary. History The first edition was published in 1891 by West P ...
'' defines 'void' as: In the case of a contract, this means there is no legal obligation, therefore there can be no
breach of contract Breach of contract is a legal cause of action and a type of civil wrong, in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party ...
since the contract is null, but there may be an implied contract which requires the recipient of goods or services provided to pay their reasonable value.U.S. Comptroller General
B-211213: The Department of Labor -- Request for Advance Decision
published 21 April 1983, accessed 1 September 2022
Black's Dictionary further goes on to define 'void ''ab initio'' as: In practical terms, 'void' is usually used in contradistinction to ' voidable' and ' unenforceable', the principal difference being that an action which is voidable remains valid until it is avoided.


Significance

The significance of this usually lies in the possibility of third party rights being acquired in good faith. For example, in '' Cundy v Lindsay'' (1878), a fraudster using the name Blenkarn posed as a retailer and induced Lindsay & Co to deliver 250 dozen linen handkerchiefs to him. Blenkarn then sold the handkerchiefs on to an innocent third party, Cundy, but Lindsay was never paid. Lindsay, claiming ownership of the handkerchiefs, sued Cundy for their return. If the contract of sale to Blenkarn was held to be ''voidable'' for fraud, then Lindsay & Co would only have recourse against the insolvent Blenkarn. However, if (as was held) the contract of sale was ''void ab initio'', then the title did not pass from Lindsay to Blenkarn in the first place, and Lindsay could claim back the handkerchiefs from Cundy as their property. Cundy was left with only a claim against the insolvent Blenkarn. In every case, third parties involved with
bad faith Bad faith (Latin: ''mala fides'') is a sustained form of deception which consists of entertaining or pretending to entertain one set of feelings while acting as if influenced by another."of two hearts ... a sustained form of deception whic ...
in void or voidable contracts not only are affected by nullity, but may also be liable for statutory damages. However, the right to avoid a voidable transaction can be lost (usually lost by delay). These are sometimes referred to as "bars to
rescission Rescission is the noun form of the verb "to rescind." It may refer to: * Rescission (contract law) * Rescission bill, a procedure to rescind previously appropriated funding in the United States * A synonym for repeal in parliamentary procedure * ...
". Such considerations do not apply to matters affected by absolute nullity, or void ''ab initio''.


See also

* Legal nullity


References

{{Authority control Legal terminology Contract law