Wehha of East Anglia

Wehha is listed by Anglo-Saxon records as a king of the East Angles. If he existed, Wehha ruled the East Angles as a pagan king during the 6th century, at the time the region was being established as a kingdom by migrants arriving from what is now Frisia and the southern Jutland peninsula. Early sources identify him as a member of the Wuffingas dynasty, which was established around the east coast of Suffolk. Nothing of his reign is known.

According to the East Anglian tally from the ''Textus Roffensis'', Wehha was the son of Wilhelm. The 9th century ''History of the Britons'' lists Wehha, named as 'Guillem Guercha', as the first king of the East Angles, as well as his son and heir Wuffa, after whom the dynasty was named. It has been claimed that the name ''Wehha'' is a hypocoristic version of '' Wihstān'', from the Anglo-Saxon poem '' Beowulf''. This claim, along with evidence from finds discovered at Sutton Hoo in 1939, suggests a connection between the Wuffingas and a Swedish dynasty, the Scylfings.

Background

Wehha is thought to have been the earliest ruler of East Anglia, an independent and long-lived Anglo-Saxon kingdom established in the 6th century, which includes the modern English counties of Norfolk and Suffolk.

According to the historian R. Rainbird Clarke, migrants from southern Jutland "speedily dominated" the Sandlings, an area of southeast Suffolk, and then, by around 550, "lost no time in conquering the whole of East Anglia". Rainbird Clarke identified Wehha, the founder of the dynasty, as one of the leaders of the new arrivals: the East Angles are tentatively identified with the Geats of the Old English poem '' Beowulf''. He used the evidence of the finds at Sutton Hoo to conclude that the Wuffingas originated from Sweden, noting that the sword, helmet and shield found in the ship burial at Sutton Hoo may have been family heirlooms, brought across from Sweden in the beginning of the 6th century. As it is now thought these artefacts were made in England, there is less agreement that the Wuffingas dynasty was directly linked with Sweden.

The extent of the kingdom can be determined from a variety of sources. It was isolated to the north and east by the North Sea, with impenetrable forests to the south and the swamps and scattered islands of the Fens on its western border. The main land route from East Anglia would at that time have been a land corridor, following the prehistoric Icknield Way. The southern neighbours of the East Angles were the East Saxons and across the other side of the Fens were the Middle Angles. It has been suggested that the Devil's Dyke (near modern Newmarket) formed part of the kingdom's western boundary, but its construction, which dates from between the 4th and 10th centuries, may not be of Early Anglo-Saxon origin.

Genealogy

Wehha is a semi-historical figure and no evidence has survived to show he actually existed or was ever king of the East Angles. The name ''Wehha'' is included in tallies of the ruling Wuffingas dynasty: it appears as ''Ƿehh Ƿilhelming''—Wehha Wilhelming—in the East Anglian tally from the ''Textus Roffensis'', an important collection of Anglo-Saxon laws and Rochester Cathedral registers. The so-called ''Anglian collection'' has survived within two books bound together in the 13th century.Medway Council, Medway City Ark: ''The'' Textus Roffensis
notes
Accessed 9 August 2010. According to this list, Wehha was the son of Wilhelm, who was the son of Hryþ, who was the son of Hroðmund, the son of Trygil, the son of Tyttman, the son of Casere Odisson, the son of the god Wōden. Wehha's son Wuffa, after whom the Wuffingas dynasty is named, is also listed.

According to the 9th century ''History of the Britons'', Guillem Guercha was the first of his line to rule the East Angles. The ''History of the Britons'' lists Guillem Guercha's descendants and ancestors: "Woden begat Casser, who begat Titinon, who begat Trigil, who begat Rodmunt, who begat Rippa, who begat Guillem Guercha, who was the first king of the East Angles." According to the 19th-century historian Francis Palgrave, ''Guercha'' is a distortion of ''Wuffa''. According to Palgrave, "''Guercha'' is a form of the name ''Uffa'', or ''Wuffa'', arising in the first instance, from the pronunciation of the British writer, and in the next place, from the error of the transcriber". D. P. Kirby is among those historians who have concluded from this information that Wuffa's father was the founder of the Wuffingas line.

Despite the Wuffingas' long list of ancestors—that stretch back to their pagan gods —their power in the region can only have been established in the middle third of the 6th century, if Wehha is taken as the dynastic founder. The historian Martin Carver has warned against using the scant material that exists to draw detailed inferences about the earliest Wuffingas kings.

:''See Wuffingas for a more complete family tree.''

Etymology

The name ''Wehha'' has been linked as a hypocoristic (shortened) version of '' Wihstān'', the father of Wiglaf in the Anglo-Saxon poem '' Beowulf'', strengthening the evidence for a connection between the Wuffingas dynasty and a Swedish royal dynasty, the Scylfings. It has also been suggested that ''Wehha'' is a regular hypocoristic form of Old English names beginning with ''Wē(o)h-'', for instance in the unattested name *''Weohha''.

''Wehha'' may occur on a bronze pail excavated from the Chessell Down cemetery on the Isle of Wight, which possesses the runic inscription '.

Reign and succession

Nothing is known of Wehha or of his rule, as no written records—if they ever existed— have survived from this period in East Anglian history. At an unknown date Wehha was succeeded by Wuffa, who was ruling the kingdom in 571, according to the mediaeval chronicler Roger of Wendover. The date given by Roger of Wendover cannot be corroborated.

Notes

Footnotes

Sources

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

Further reading

*

External links

*

{{Kings of East Anglia, state=collapsed

6th-century English monarchs
Anglo-Saxon pagans
East Anglian monarchs
House of Wuffingas
People whose existence is disputed