HOME
The Info List - Vedic Sanskrit



--- Advertisement ---


(i)

VEDIC SANSKRIT is an Indo-European language
Indo-European language
, more specifically one branch of the Indo-Iranian group. It is the ancient language of the Vedas
Vedas
of Hinduism
Hinduism
, texts compiled over the period of the mid-2nd to mid-1st millennium BCE. It was orally preserved , predating the advent of Brahmi script
Brahmi script
by several centuries. Vedic Sanskrit
Sanskrit
is an archaic language, whose consensus translation has been challenging.

Extensive ancient literature in the Vedic Sanskrit
Sanskrit
language has survived into the modern era, and this has been a major source of information about Indo-European parent language. Quite early in the pre-historic era, Sanskrit
Sanskrit
separated from the Avestan
Avestan
language (an Eastern Iranian language ). The exact century of separation is unknown but this separation of Sanskrit
Sanskrit
and Avestan
Avestan
occurred certainly before 1800 BCE. Avestan
Avestan
language developed in ancient Persia, was the language of Zoroastrianism
Zoroastrianism
, but was a dead language in the Sasanian period . Vedic Sanskrit
Sanskrit
developed independently in ancient India, evolved into classical Sanskrit
Sanskrit
after the grammar and linguistic treatise of Pāṇini
Pāṇini
, and later into many related Indian subcontinent languages in which are found the voluminous ancient and medieval literature of Buddhism, Hinduism
Hinduism
and Jainism.

CONTENTS

* 1 History

* 1.1 Prehistoric derivation * 1.2 Chronology

* 2 See also * 3 Notes * 4 References * 5 External links

HISTORY

Ancient Sanskrit
Sanskrit
text on hemp-based paper. Hemp fiber was commonly used in the production of paper from 200 BCE to the late 1800s.

PREHISTORIC DERIVATION

Further information: Substratum in the Vedic language

The separation of proto-Indo-Iranian language into Avestan
Avestan
and Vedic Sanskrit
Sanskrit
is estimated, on linguistic grounds, to have occurred around or before 1800 BCE. The date of composition of the oldest hymns of the Rigveda
Rigveda
is vague at best, generally estimated to roughly 1500 BCE. Both Asko Parpola
Asko Parpola
(1988) and J. P. Mallory (1998) place the locus of the division of Indo-Aryan from Iranian in the Bronze Age culture of the Bactria–Margiana Archaeological Complex
Bactria–Margiana Archaeological Complex
(BMAC). Parpola (1999) elaborates the model and has "Proto-Rigvedic" Indo-Aryans intrude the BMAC around 1700 BCE. He assumes early Indo-Aryan presence in the Late Harappan horizon from about 1900 BCE, and "Proto-Rigvedic" (Proto-Dardic) intrusion to the Punjab as corresponding to the Gandhara grave culture from about 1700 BCE. According to this model, Rigvedic within the larger Indo-Aryan group is the direct ancestor of the Dardic languages . The hymns of the Rigveda
Rigveda
are thus composed in a sacred language which was based on the natural language spoken in Gandhara
Gandhara
during the early phase of the Gandhara grave culture at the end of Bronze Age India . This liturgical language over the following centuries came to be separated from spoken vernaculars and came to be known as the "artificial" or "elaborated" (saṃskṛta) language, contrasted to the "natural" or "unrefined" prākṛta vernaculars by the end of the Vedic period.

CHRONOLOGY

According to Michael Witzel, five chronologically distinct strata can be identified within the Vedic language:

* RIGVEDIC Many words in the Vedic Sanskrit
Sanskrit
of the Rigveda
Rigveda
have cognates or direct correspondences with the ancient Avestan
Avestan
language, but these do not appear in post-Rigvedic Indian texts. The Rigveda must have been essentially complete by around the 12th century BCE. The pre-1200 BCE layers mark a gradual change in Vedic Sanskrit, but there is disappearance of these archaic correspondences and linguistics in the post-Rigvedic period. * MANTRA LANGUAGE This period includes both the mantra and prose language of the Atharvaveda
Atharvaveda
(Paippalada and Shaunakiya), the Rigveda Khilani , the Samaveda
Samaveda
Samhita, and the mantras of the Yajurveda
Yajurveda
. These texts are largely derived from the Rigveda, but have undergone certain changes, both by linguistic change and by reinterpretation. For example, the more ancient injunctive verb system is no longer in use. * SAMHITA PROSE An important linguistic change is the disappearance of the injunctive , subjunctive, optative, imperative (the modi of the aorist ). New innovation in Vedic Sanskrit
Sanskrit
appear such as the development of periphrastic aorist forms. This must have occurred before the time of Pāṇini
Pāṇini
because Panini makes a list of those from northwestern region of India who knew these older rules of Vedic Sanskrit. * BRAHMANA PROSE In this layer of Vedic literature, the archaic Vedic Sanskrit
Sanskrit
verb system has been abandoned, and a prototype of pre-Panini Vedic Sanskrit
Sanskrit
structure emerges. The Yajñagāthās texts provide a probable link between Vedic Sanskrit, Classical Sanskrit
Classical Sanskrit
and languages of the Epics. Complex meters such as Anuṣṭubh and rules of Sanskrit prosody
Sanskrit prosody
had been or were being innovated by this time, but parts of the Brahmana
Brahmana
layers show the language is still close to Vedic Sanskrit. * SUTRA LANGUAGE This is the last stratum of Vedic literature, comprising the bulk of the Śrautasūtras and Gṛhyasūtras and some Upanishads
Upanishads
such as the Katha Upanishad
Katha Upanishad
and Maitrayaniya Upanishad
Maitrayaniya Upanishad
.

SEE ALSO

* Grammar of the Vedic language * Vedic meter * Vedic period
Vedic period
* A Vedic Word Concordance

NOTES

* ^ Michael Witzel (2006). Victor H. Mair, ed. Contact And Exchange in the Ancient World. University of Hawaii Press. p. 160. ISBN 978-0-8248-2884-4 . * ^ Restoring historical language of the vedas from attested vedic * ^ A B C D Philip Baldi (1983). An Introduction to the Indo-European Languages. Southern Illinois University Press. pp. 51–52. ISBN 978-0-8093-1091-3 . * ^ A B Christopher I. Beckwith (2009). Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 363–368. ISBN 0-691-13589-4 . * ^ Ahmad Hasan Dani; B. A. Litvinsky (1996). History of Civilizations of Central Asia: The crossroads of civilizations, A.D. 250 to 750. UNESCO. p. 85. ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0 . ; Quote: "The oldest extant manuscript of the Avesta dates back to 1258 or 1278. In the Sasanian period, Avestan
Avestan
was considered a dead language." * ^ Hamid Wahed Alikuzai (2013). A Concise History of Afghanistan in 25 Volumes. Trafford. p. 44. ISBN 978-1-4907-1441-7 . ;Quote "The Avestan
Avestan
language is called Avestan
Avestan
because the sacred scriptures of Zoroastrianism, Avesta, were written in this old form. Avestan
Avestan
died out long before the advent of Islam and except for scriptural use not much has remained of it." * ^ Rens Bod (2013). A New History of the Humanities: The Search for Principles and Patterns from Antiquity to the Present. Oxford University Press. pp. 14–18. ISBN 978-0-19-164294-4 . * ^ William J. Frawley (2003). International Encyclopedia of Linguistics: AAVE-Esperanto. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. p. 269. ISBN 978-0-19-513977-8 . * ^ Mallory, J.P. (1989