VEDIC SANSKRIT is an Indo-European language , more specifically one branch of the Indo-Iranian group. It is the ancient language of the Vedas of Hinduism , texts compiled over the period of the mid-2nd to mid-1st millennium BCE. It was orally preserved , predating the advent of Brahmi script by several centuries. Vedic Sanskrit is an archaic language, whose consensus translation has been challenging.
Extensive ancient literature in the Vedic Sanskrit language has survived into the modern era, and this has been a major source of information about Indo-European parent language. Quite early in the pre-historic era, Sanskrit separated from the Avestan language (an Eastern Iranian language ). The exact century of separation is unknown but this separation of Sanskrit and Avestan occurred certainly before 1800 BCE. Avestan language developed in ancient Persia, was the language of Zoroastrianism , but was a dead language in the Sasanian period . Vedic Sanskrit developed independently in ancient India, evolved into classical Sanskrit after the grammar and linguistic treatise of Pāṇini , and later into many related Indian subcontinent languages in which are found the voluminous ancient and medieval literature of Buddhism, Hinduism and Jainism.
* 1 History
* 1.1 Prehistoric derivation * 1.2 Chronology
* 2 See also * 3 Notes * 4 References * 5 External links
Ancient Sanskrit text on hemp-based paper. Hemp fiber was commonly used in the production of paper from 200 BCE to the late 1800s.
Further information: Substratum in the Vedic language
The separation of proto-Indo-Iranian language into Avestan and Vedic Sanskrit is estimated, on linguistic grounds, to have occurred around or before 1800 BCE. The date of composition of the oldest hymns of the Rigveda is vague at best, generally estimated to roughly 1500 BCE. Both Asko Parpola (1988) and J. P. Mallory (1998) place the locus of the division of Indo-Aryan from Iranian in the Bronze Age culture of the Bactria–Margiana Archaeological Complex (BMAC). Parpola (1999) elaborates the model and has "Proto-Rigvedic" Indo-Aryans intrude the BMAC around 1700 BCE. He assumes early Indo-Aryan presence in the Late Harappan horizon from about 1900 BCE, and "Proto-Rigvedic" (Proto-Dardic) intrusion to the Punjab as corresponding to the Gandhara grave culture from about 1700 BCE. According to this model, Rigvedic within the larger Indo-Aryan group is the direct ancestor of the Dardic languages . The hymns of the Rigveda are thus composed in a sacred language which was based on the natural language spoken in Gandhara during the early phase of the Gandhara grave culture at the end of Bronze Age India . This liturgical language over the following centuries came to be separated from spoken vernaculars and came to be known as the "artificial" or "elaborated" (_saṃskṛta_) language, contrasted to the "natural" or "unrefined" _prākṛta _ vernaculars by the end of the Vedic period.
According to Michael Witzel, five chronologically distinct strata can be identified within the Vedic language:
* RIGVEDIC Many words in the Vedic Sanskrit of the _ Rigveda _ have cognates or direct correspondences with the ancient Avestan language, but these do not appear in post-Rigvedic Indian texts. The _Rigveda_ must have been essentially complete by around the 12th century BCE. The pre-1200 BCE layers mark a gradual change in Vedic Sanskrit, but there is disappearance of these archaic correspondences and linguistics in the post-Rigvedic period. * MANTRA LANGUAGE This period includes both the mantra and prose language of the _ Atharvaveda _ (Paippalada and Shaunakiya), the _Rigveda_ Khilani , the _ Samaveda _ Samhita, and the mantras of the Yajurveda . These texts are largely derived from the Rigveda, but have undergone certain changes, both by linguistic change and by reinterpretation. For example, the more ancient injunctive verb system is no longer in use. * SAMHITA PROSE An important linguistic change is the disappearance of the injunctive , subjunctive, optative, imperative (the modi of the aorist ). New innovation in Vedic Sanskrit appear such as the development of periphrastic aorist forms. This must have occurred before the time of Pāṇini because Panini makes a list of those from northwestern region of India who knew these older rules of Vedic Sanskrit. * BRAHMANA PROSE In this layer of Vedic literature, the archaic Vedic Sanskrit verb system has been abandoned, and a prototype of pre-Panini Vedic Sanskrit structure emerges. The _Yajñagāthās_ texts provide a probable link between Vedic Sanskrit, Classical Sanskrit and languages of the Epics. Complex meters such as _Anuṣṭubh_ and rules of Sanskrit prosody had been or were being innovated by this time, but parts of the Brahmana layers show the language is still close to Vedic Sanskrit. * SUTRA LANGUAGE This is the last stratum of Vedic literature, comprising the bulk of the Śrautasūtras and Gṛhyasūtras and some _ Upanishads _ such as the _ Katha Upanishad _ and _Maitrayaniya Upanishad _.
* ^ Michael Witzel (2006). Victor H. Mair, ed. _Contact And Exchange in the Ancient World_. University of Hawaii Press. p. 160. ISBN 978-0-8248-2884-4 . * ^ Restoring historical language of the vedas from attested vedic * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ Philip Baldi (1983). _An Introduction to the Indo-European Languages_. Southern Illinois University Press. pp. 51–52. ISBN 978-0-8093-1091-3 . * ^ _A_ _B_ Christopher I. Beckwith (2009). _Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present_. Princeton University Press. pp. 363–368. ISBN 0-691-13589-4 . * ^ Ahmad Hasan Dani; B. A. Litvinsky (1996). _History of Civilizations of Central Asia: The crossroads of civilizations, A.D. 250 to 750_. UNESCO. p. 85. ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0 . ; Quote: "The oldest extant manuscript of the Avesta dates back to 1258 or 1278. In the Sasanian period, Avestan was considered a dead language." * ^ Hamid Wahed Alikuzai (2013). _A Concise History of Afghanistan in 25 Volumes_. Trafford. p. 44. ISBN 978-1-4907-1441-7 . ;Quote "The Avestan language is called Avestan because the sacred scriptures of Zoroastrianism, Avesta, were written in this old form. Avestan died out long before the advent of Islam and except for scriptural use not much has remained of it." * ^ Rens Bod (2013). _A New History of the Humanities: The Search for Principles and Patterns from Antiquity to the Present_. Oxford University Press. pp. 14–18. ISBN 978-0-19-164294-4 . * ^ William J. Frawley (2003). _International Encyclopedia of Linguistics: AAVE-Esperanto. Vol. 1_. Oxford University Press. p. 269. ISBN 978-0-19-513977-8 . * ^ Mallory, J.P. (1989). _In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archaeology, and Myth_. London: Thames & Hudson. p. 38f. * ^ J. P. Mallory; Douglas Q. Adams (1997). _Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture_. Taylor & Francis. p. 306. ISBN 978-1-884964-98-5 . * ^ Parpola, Asko (1999), "The formation of the Aryan branch of Indo-European", in Blench, Roger & Spriggs, Matthew, Archaeology and Language, vol. III: Artefacts, languages and texts, London and New York: Routledge. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_