TAXONOMY (from Ancient Greek τάξις (taxis ), meaning
'arrangement', and -νομία (-nomia), meaning 'method ') is the
science of defining and naming groups of biological organisms on the
basis of shared characteristics. Organisms are grouped together into
taxa (singular: taxon) and these groups are given a taxonomic rank ;
groups of a given rank can be aggregated to form a super group of
higher rank, thus creating a taxonomic hierarchy. The principal ranks
in modern use are kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus and
species. The Swedish botanist
Carl Linnaeus is regarded as the father
of taxonomy, as he developed a system known as
Linnaean taxonomy for
categorization of organisms and binomial nomenclature for naming
With the advent of such fields of study as phylogenetics , cladistics
, and systematics , the
Linnaean system has progressed to a system of
modern biological classification based on the evolutionary
relationships between organisms, both living and extinct.
* 1 Definition
* 1.1 Alpha and beta taxonomy
* 1.2 Microtaxonomy and macrotaxonomy
* 2 History
* 2.1 Pre-Linnaean
* 2.1.1 Early taxonomists
* 2.1.3 Ancient times
* 2.1.4 Medieval
Renaissance and Early Modern
* 2.2 The Linnaean era
* 3 Modern system of classification
* 3.1 Kingdoms and domains
* 3.2 Recent comprehensive classifications
* 4 Application
* 4.1 Classifying organisms
* 4.2 Taxonomic descriptions
* 4.3 Author citation
* 6 Databases
* 7 See also
* 8 Notes
* 9 References
* 10 Bibliography
* 11 External links
The exact definition of taxonomy varies from source to source, but
the core of the discipline remains: the conception, naming, and
classification of groups of organisms. As points of reference, recent
definitions of taxonomy are presented below:
* Theory and practice of grouping individuals into species,
arranging species into larger groups, and giving those groups names,
thus producing a classification
* A field of science (and major component of systematics ) that
encompasses description, identification, nomenclature, and
* The science of classification, in biology the arrangement of
organisms into a classification
* "The science of classification as applied to living organisms,
including study of means of formation of species, etc."
* "The analysis of an organism's characteristics for the purpose of
* " studies phylogeny to provide a pattern that can be translated
into the classification and names of the more inclusive field of
taxonomy" (listed as a desirable but unusual definition)
The varied definitions either place taxonomy as a sub-area of
systematics (definition 2), invert that relationship (definition 6),
or appear to consider the two terms synonymous. There is some
disagreement as to whether biological nomenclature is considered a
part of taxonomy (definitions 1 and 2), or a part of systematics
outside taxonomy. For example, definition 6 is paired with the
following definition of systematics that places nomenclature outside
* Systematics: "The study of the identification, taxonomy, and
nomenclature of organisms, including the classification of living
things with regard to their natural relationships and the study of
variation and the evolution of taxa".
A whole set of terms including taxonomy, systematic biology ,
systematics, biosystematics , scientific classification, biological
classification, and phylogenetics have at times had overlapping
meanings – sometimes the same, sometimes slightly different, but
always related and intersecting. The broadest meaning of "taxonomy"
is used here. The term itself was introduced in 1813 by de Candolle ,
in his Théorie élémentaire de la botanique.
ALPHA AND BETA TAXONOMY
Not to be confused with
Alpha diversity .
The term "ALPHA TAXONOMY" is primarily used today to refer to the
discipline of finding, describing, and naming taxa , particularly
species. In earlier literature, the term had a different meaning,
referring to morphological taxonomy, and the products of research
through the end of the 19th century.
William Bertram Turrill introduced the term "alpha taxonomy" in a
series of papers published in 1935 and 1937 in which he discussed the
philosophy and possible future directions of the discipline of
… there is an increasing desire amongst taxonomists to consider
their problems from wider viewpoints, to investigate the possibilities
of closer co-operation with their cytological, ecological and
genetical colleagues and to acknowledge that some revision or
expansion, perhaps of a drastic nature, of their aims and methods, may
be desirable … Turrill (1935) has suggested that while accepting the
older invaluable taxonomy, based on structure, and conveniently
designated "alpha", it is possible to glimpse a far-distant taxonomy
built upon as wide a basis of morphological and physiological facts as
possible, and one in which "place is found for all observational and
experimental data relating, even if indirectly, to the constitution,
subdivision, origin, and behaviour of species and other taxonomic
groups". Ideals can, it may be said, never be completely realized.
They have, however, a great value of acting as permanent stimulants,
and if we have some, even vague, ideal of an "omega" taxonomy we may
progress a little way down the Greek alphabet. Some of us please
ourselves by thinking we are now groping in a "beta" taxonomy.
Turrill thus explicitly excludes from alpha taxonomy various areas of
study that he includes within taxonomy as a whole, such as ecology,
physiology, genetics, and cytology. He further excludes phylogenetic
reconstruction from alpha taxonomy (pp. 365–366).
Later authors have used the term in a different sense, to mean the
delimitation of species (not subspecies or taxa of other ranks), using
whatever investigative techniques are available, and including
sophisticated computational or laboratory techniques. Thus, Ernst
Mayr in 1968 defined BETA TAXONOMY as the classification of ranks
higher than species.
An understanding of the biological meaning of variation and of the
evolutionary origin of groups of related species is even more
important for the second stage of taxonomic activity, the sorting of
species into groups of relatives ("taxa") and their arrangement in a
hierarchy of higher categories. This activity is what the term
classification denotes; it is also referred to as BETA TAXONOMY.
MICROTAXONOMY AND MACROTAXONOMY
How species should be defined in a particular group of organisms
gives rise to practical and theoretical problems that are referred to
as the species problem . The scientific work of deciding how to define
species has been called microtaxonomy. By extension, macrotaxonomy
is the study of groups at higher taxonomic ranks , from subgenus and
above only, than species.
While some descriptions of taxonomic history attempt to date taxonomy
to ancient civilizations, a truly scientific attempt to classify
organisms did not occur until the 18th century. Earlier works were
primarily descriptive and focused on plants that were useful in
agriculture or medicine. There are a number of stages in this
scientific thinking. Early taxonomy was based on arbitrary criteria,
the so-called "artificial systems", including Linnaeus's system of
sexual classification. Later came systems based on a more complete
consideration of the characteristics of taxa, referred to as "natural
systems", such as those of de Jussieu (1789), de Candolle (1813) and
Bentham and Hooker (1862–1863). These were pre-evolutionary in
thinking. The publication of
Charles Darwin 's On the Origin of
Species (1859) led to new ways of thinking about classification based
on evolutionary relationships. This was the concept of phyletic
systems, from 1883 onwards. This approach was typified by those of
Eichler (1883) and Engler (1886–1892). The advent of molecular
genetics and statistical methodology allowed the creation of the
modern era of "phylogenetic systems" based on cladistics , rather than
Naming and classifying our surroundings has probably been taking
place as long as mankind has been able to communicate. It would always
have been important to know the names of poisonous and edible plants
and animals in order to communicate this information to other members
of the family or group.
Medicinal plant illustrations show up in Egyptian wall paintings from
c. 1500 BC. The paintings clearly show that these societies valued
and communicated the uses of different species, and therefore had a
basic taxonomy in place.
In Canto 3, chapter 10 of
Bhagavata Purana 6 types of trees are
recognised, by name:
* Vanaspatis – large trees that grow fruits without flowering.
* Drumas – large trees that bloom and give fruits.
* Osadhis – trees that die soon after they give fruits.
* Latas – creepers and tiny plants.
* Viruts – plants that grow as bushes.
* Tvaksaras – plants hollow inside with strong barks like bamboos.
Further information: Aristotle\'s biology § Classification
Organisms were first classified by
Greece , 384–322 BC)
during his stay on the Island of
Lesbos . He classified beings by
their parts, or in modern terms attributes, such as having live birth,
having four legs, laying eggs, having blood, or being warm-bodied. He
divided all living things into two groups: plants and animals. Some
of his groups of animals, such as Anhaima (animals without blood,
translated as invertebrates ) and Enhaima (animals with blood, roughly
the vertebrates ), as well as groups like the selachians and cetaceans
, are still commonly used today. His student
370–285 BC) carried on this tradition, mentioning some 500 plants
and their uses in his Historia Plantarum . Again, several plant groups
currently still recognized can be traced back to Theophrastus, such as
Crocus , and Narcissus .
Taxonomy in the
Middle Ages was largely based on the Aristotelian
system , with additions concerning the philosophical and existential
order of creatures. This included concepts such as the Great chain of
being in the Western scholastic tradition, again deriving ultimately
Aristotelian system did not classify plants or fungi,
due to the lack of microscope at the time, as his ideas were based on
arranging the complete world in a single continuum, as per the scala
naturae (the Natural Ladder). This, as well, was taken into
consideration in the Great chain of being. Advances were made by
scholars such as
Timotheos of Gaza , Demetrios Pepagomenos
Thomas Aquinas . Medieval thinkers used abstract philosophical
and logical categorizations more suited to abstract philosophy than to
Renaissance And Early Modern
Renaissance , the Age of Reason , and the Enlightenment,
categorizing organisms became more prevalent, and taxonomic works
became ambitious enough to replace the ancient texts. This is
sometimes credited to the development of sophisticated optical lenses,
which allowed the morphology of organisms to be studied in much
greater detail. One of the earliest authors to take advantage of this
leap in technology was the Italian physician Andrea Cesalpino
(1519–1603), who has been called "the first taxonomist". His magnum
opus De Plantis came out in 1583, and described more than 1500 plant
species. Two large plant families that he first recognized are still
in use today: the
Brassicaceae . Then in the 17th
John Ray (
England , 1627–1705) wrote many important
taxonomic works. Arguably his greatest accomplishment was Methodus
Plantarum Nova (1682), in which he published details of over 18,000
plant species. At the time, his classifications were perhaps the most
complex yet produced by any taxonomist, as he based his taxa on many
combined characters. The next major taxonomic works were produced by
Joseph Pitton de Tournefort (France, 1656–1708). His work from
1700, Institutiones Rei Herbariae, included more than 9000 species in
698 genera, which directly influenced Linnaeus, as it was the text he
used as a young student.
THE LINNAEAN ERA
Linnaean taxonomy Title page of
Systema Naturae ,
The Swedish botanist
Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778) ushered in a new
era of taxonomy. With his major works
Systema Naturae 1st Edition in
Species Plantarum in 1753, and
Systema Naturae 10th Edition ,
he revolutionized modern taxonomy. His works implemented a
standardized binomial naming system for animal and plant species,
which proved to be an elegant solution to a chaotic and disorganized
taxonomic literature. He not only introduced the standard of class,
order, genus, and species, but also made it possible to identify
plants and animals from his book, by using the smaller parts of the
flower. Thus the
Linnaean system was born, and is still used in
essentially the same way today as it was in the 18th century.
Currently, plant and animal taxonomists regard Linnaeus' work as the
"starting point" for valid names (at 1753 and 1758 respectively).
Names published before these dates are referred to as "pre-Linnaean",
and not considered valid (with the exception of spiders published in
Svenska Spindlar ). Even taxonomic names published by Linnaeus
himself before these dates are considered pre-Linnaean.
MODERN SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION
Evolutionary taxonomy and
Evolution of the vertebrates at class level, width of spindles
indicating number of families. Spindle diagrams are typical for
Evolutionary taxonomy The same relationship, expressed as a
cladogram typical for cladistics
Whereas Linnaeus classified for ease of identification, the idea of
Linnaean taxonomy as translating into a sort of dendrogram of the
Animal - and
Plant Kingdoms was formulated toward the end of the 18th
century, well before
On the Origin of Species
On the Origin of Species was published. Among
early works exploring the idea of a transmutation of species were
Erasmus Darwin 's 1796 Zoönomia and
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck 's
Philosophie Zoologique of 1809. The idea was popularised in the
Anglophone world by the speculative but widely read Vestiges of the
Natural History of Creation , published anonymously by Robert Chambers
With Darwin's theory, a general acceptance quickly appeared that a
classification should reflect the Darwinian principle of common
descent . Tree of Life representations became popular in scientific
works, with known fossil groups incorporated. One of the first modern
groups tied to fossil ancestors was birds . Using the then newly
discovered fossils of
Hesperornis , Thomas Henry
Huxley pronounced that they had evolved from dinosaurs, a group
formally named by
Richard Owen in 1842. The resulting description,
that of dinosaurs "giving rise to" or being "the ancestors of" birds,
is the essential hallmark of evolutionary taxonomic thinking. As more
and more fossil groups were found and recognized in the late 19th and
early 20th centuries, palaeontologists worked to understand the
history of animals through the ages by linking together known groups.
With the modern evolutionary synthesis of the early 1940s, an
essentially modern understanding of the evolution of the major groups
was in place. As evolutionary taxonomy is based on Linnaean taxonomic
ranks, the two terms are largely interchangeable in modern use.
The cladistic method (or cladism) has emerged since the 1960s. In
Julian Huxley used the term clade. Later, in 1960, Cain and
Harrison introduced the term cladistic. The salient feature is
arranging taxa in a hierarchical evolutionary tree , ignoring ranks.
A taxon is called monophyletic, if it includes all the descendants of
an ancestral form. Groups that have descendant groups removed from
them (e.g. dinosaurs , with birds as offspring group) are termed
paraphyletic , while groups representing more than one branch from
the tree of life are called polyphyletic . The International Code of
PhyloCode is intended to regulate the
formal naming of clades . Linnaean ranks will be optional under the
PhyloCode, which is intended to coexist with the current, rank-based
KINGDOMS AND DOMAINS
The basic scheme of modern classification. Many other levels can
be used; the highest level, domain, is both new and disputed. Main
Well before Linnaeus, plants and animals were considered separate
Kingdoms. Linnaeus used this as the top rank, dividing the physical
world into the plant, animal and mineral kingdoms. As advances in
microscopy made classification of microorganisms possible, the number
of kingdoms increased, five and six-kingdom systems being the most
Domains are a relatively new grouping. First proposed in 1977, Carl
Woese 's three-domain system was not generally accepted until later.
One main characteristic of the three-domain method is the separation
Bacteria , previously grouped into the single kingdom
Bacteria (a kingdom also sometimes called
Monera ), with the
Eukaryota for all organisms whose cells contain a nucleus . A small
number of scientists include a sixth kingdom, Archaea, but do not
accept the domain method.
Thomas Cavalier-Smith , who has published extensively on the
classification of protists , has recently proposed that the
the clade that groups together the
Archaea and Eucarya , would have
evolved from Bacteria, more precisely from
Actinobacteria . His 2004
classification treated the archaeobacteria as part of a subkingdom of
the Kingdom Bacteria, i.e. he rejected the three-domain system
entirely. Stefan Luketa in 2012 proposed a five "dominion" system,
adding Prionobiota (acellular and without nucleic acid) and
Virusobiota (acellular but with nucleic acid) to the traditional three
1969 Woese et al.
Kingdom (biology) § Summary
RECENT COMPREHENSIVE CLASSIFICATIONS
Partial classifications exist for many individual groups of organisms
and are revised and replaced as new information becomes available,
however comprehensive treatments of most or all life are rarer; two
recent examples are that of Adl et al., 2012, which covers eukaryotes
only with an emphasis on protists, and Ruggiero et al., 2015,
covering both eukaryotes and prokaryotes to the rank of Order,
although both exclude fossil representatives.
Biological taxonomy is a sub-discipline of biology , and is generally
practiced by biologists known as "taxonomists", though enthusiastic
naturalists are also frequently involved in the publication of new
taxa. The work carried out by taxonomists is crucial for the
understanding of biology in general. Two fields of applied biology in
which taxonomic work is of fundamental importance are the studies of
biodiversity and conservation . Without a working classification of
the organisms in any given area, estimating the amount of diversity
present is unrealistic, making informed conservation decisions
Biological classification is a critical component of the taxonomic
process. As a result, it informs the user as to what the relatives of
the taxon are hypothesized to be.
Biological classification uses
taxonomic ranks, including among others (in order from most inclusive
to least inclusive): Domain , Kingdom,
Phylum , Class , Order , Family
Genus , and
Species description Type specimen for Nepenthes
smilesii , a tropical pitcher plant .
The "definition" of a taxon is encapsulated by its description or its
diagnosis or by both combined. There are no set rules governing the
definition of taxa, but the naming and publication of new taxa is
governed by sets of rules. In zoology , the nomenclature for the more
commonly used ranks (superfamily to subspecies ), is regulated by the
International Code of Zoological
Nomenclature (ICZN Code). In the
fields of botany , phycology , and mycology , the naming of taxa is
governed by the International Code of
Nomenclature for algae, fungi,
and plants (ICN).
The initial description of a taxon involves five main requirements:
* The taxon must be given a name based on the 26 letters of the
Latin alphabet (a binomial for new species, or uninomial for other
* The name must be unique (i.e. not a homonym ).
* The description must be based on at least one name-bearing type
* It should include statements about appropriate attributes either
to describe (define) the taxon or to differentiate it from other taxa
(the diagnosis, ICZN Code, Article 13.1.1, ICN, Article 38). Both
codes deliberately separate defining the content of a taxon (its
circumscription ) from defining its name.
* These first four requirements must be published in a work that is
obtainable in numerous identical copies, as a permanent scientific
However, often much more information is included, like the geographic
range of the taxon, ecological notes, chemistry, behavior, etc. How
researchers arrive at their taxa varies: depending on the available
data, and resources, methods vary from simple quantitative or
qualitative comparisons of striking features, to elaborate computer
analyses of large amounts of
DNA sequence data.
Author citation (botany) and Author citation (zoology)
An "authority" may be placed after a scientific name. The authority
is the name of the scientist or scientists who first validly published
the name. For example, in 1758 Linnaeus gave the
Asian elephant the
scientific name Elephas maximus, so the name is sometimes written as
"Elephas maximus Linnaeus, 1758". The names of authors are frequently
abbreviated: the abbreviation L., for Linnaeus, is commonly used. In
botany, there is, in fact, a regulated list of standard abbreviations
(see list of botanists by author abbreviation ). The system for
assigning authorities differs slightly between botany and zoology .
However, it is standard that if a species' name or placement has been
changed since the original description, the original authority's name
is placed in parentheses.
In phenetics, also known as taximetrics, or numerical taxonomy,
organisms are classified based on overall similarity, regardless of
their phylogeny or evolutionary relationships. It results in a
measure of evolutionary "distance" between taxa. Phenetic methods have
become relatively rare in modern times, largely superseded by
cladistic analyses, as phenetic methods do not distinguish
plesiomorphic from apomorphic traits. However, certain phenetic
methods, such as neighbor joining , have found their way into
cladistics, as a reasonable approximation of phylogeny when more
advanced methods (such as
Bayesian inference ) are too computationally
Modern taxonomy uses database technologies to search and catalogue
classifications and their documentation. While there is no commonly
used database, there are comprehensive databases such as the Catalogue
of Life , which attempts to list every documented species. The
catalogue listed 1.64 million species for all kingdoms as of April
2016, claiming coverage of more than three quarters of the estimated
species known to modern science.
Automated species identification
Automated species identification
Consortium for the Barcode of Life
Glossary of scientific naming
Incertae sedis , or "of uncertain placement", a term used for a
taxonomic group where its broader relationships are unknown or
* ^ This ranking system can be remembered by the mnemonic "Do Kings
Play Chess On Fine Glass Sets?"
* ^ A B Wilkins, J. S. (5 February 2011). "What is systematics and
what is taxonomy?". Retrieved 21 August 2016.
* ^ Judd, W.S., Campbell, C.S., Kellogg, E.A., Stevens, P.F.,
Donoghue, M.J. (2007) Taxonomy. In
Systematics – A
Phylogenetic Approach, Third Edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
* ^ Simpson, Michael G. (2010). "Chapter 1
Plant Systematics: an
Systematics (2nd ed.). Academic Press. ISBN
* ^ Kirk, P.M., Cannon, P.F., Minter, D.W., Stalpers, J.A. eds.
(2008) "Taxonomy". In Dictionary of the Fungi, 10th edition. CABI,
* ^ Walker, P.M.B., ed. (1988). The Wordsworth Dictionary of
Science and Technology. W. R. Chambers Ltd. and Cambridge University
* ^ A B Lawrence, E. (2005). Henderson\'s Dictionary Of Biology.
Pearson/Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780131273849 .
* ^ Wheeler, Quentin D. (2004). "Taxonomic triage and the poverty
of phylogeny". In H. C. J. Godfray & S. Knapp. Taxonomy for the
twenty–first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society . 359. pp. 571–583. PMC 1693342 . PMID 15253345 . doi
* ^ A B C "Nomenclature, Names, and Taxonomy".
* ^ Small, Ernest (1989). "
Systematics of Biological Systematics
(Or, Taxonomy of Taxonomy)". Taxon. 38 (3): 335–356.
JSTOR 1222265 .
doi :10.2307/1222265 .
* ^ Singh, Gurcharan (2004).
Plant systematics: an integrated
Science Publishers. ISBN 1578083516 . p. 20.
* ^ A B C D E F G H "Taxonomy: Meaning, Levels, Periods and Role".
Biology Discussion. 2016-05-27.
* ^ Rosselló-Mora, Ramon; Amann, Rudolf (2001-01-01). "The species
concept for prokaryotes". FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 25 (1): 39–67.
ISSN 1574-6976 . doi :10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00571.x .
* ^ A B Turrill, W.B. (1938). "The Expansion Of Taxonomy With
Special Reference To Spermatophyta". Biological Reviews. 13 (4):
342–373. doi :10.1111/j.1469-185X.1938.tb00522.x .
* ^ Steyskal, G.C. (1965). "Trend curves of the rate of species
description in zoology". Science. 149 (3686): 880–882. Bibcode
:1965Sci...149..880S. PMID 17737388 . doi
Ernst Mayr (1968), "The Role of
Systematics in Biology: The
study of all aspects of the diversity of life is one of the most
important concerns in biology", Science, 159 (3815): 595–599,
Bibcode :1968Sci...159..595M, PMID 4886900 , doi
* ^ Mayr, E. (1982). "Chapter 6:Microtaxonomy, the science of
species". The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and
Inheritance. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN
* ^ "Result of Your Query". www.biological-concepts.com.
* ^ Datta 1988 .
* ^ Stace 1989 .
* ^ Stuessy 2009 .
* ^ A B C Manktelow, M. (2010) History of Taxonomy. Lecture from
Dept. of Systematic Biology, Uppsala University.
* ^ Bannanje, Govindacharya (2011). Essence of Bhagavata. Udupi:
Ishavasya Prathisthana. pp. 57–58. ISBN 978-81-920104-3-4 .
* ^ Mayr, E. (1982) The Growth of Biological Thought. Belknap P. of
Harvard U.P., Cambridge (Mass.)
* ^ A B C D E F G "Palaeos : Taxonomy". palaeos.com.
* ^ A B C D "taxonomy biology". Encyclopedia Britannica.
* ^ A B C D "
Biology 101, Ch 20". www.cbs.dtu.dk. 23 March 1998.
* ^ Leroi, Armand Marie (2014). The Lagoon: How
Science . Bloomsbury. pp. 384–395. ISBN 978-1-4088-3622-4 .
* ^ "
Andrea Cesalpino Italian physician, philosopher, and
botanist". Encyclopedia Britannica.
* ^ Cesalpino, Andrea; Marescotti, Giorgio (1583). De plantis libri
XVI. Florentiae : Apud Georgium Marescottum.
* ^ "
Andrea Cesalpino Italian physician, philosopher, and
botanist". Encyclopedia Britannica.
* ^ Jaime, Prohens. International Edition Vegetables I: Asteraceae,
Brassicaceae, Chenopodicaceae, and Cucurbitaceae (Handbook of Plant
Breeding). ISBN 1441924744 .
* ^ John, Ray (1682). "Methodus plantarum nova :".
* ^ "
Joseph Pitton de Tournefort French botanist and physician".
* ^ Linnaeus, C. (1735) Systema naturae, sive regna tria naturae
systematice proposita per classes, ordines, genera, & species. Haak,
* ^ Linnaeus, C. (1753)
Species Plantarum. Stockholm, Sweden.
* ^ Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema naturae, sive regna tria naturae
systematice proposita per classes, ordines, genera, & species, 10th
Edition. Haak, Leiden
* ^ A B C "taxonomy - The
Linnaean system biology". Encyclopedia
* ^ Donk, M.A. (1957). "Typification and later starting-points"
(PDF). Taxon. 6 (9): 245–256.
JSTOR 1217493 . doi :10.2307/1217493 .
* ^ Carl, Clerck; Carl, Bergquist; Eric, Borg; L., Gottman; Lars,
Salvius (1757). "Svenska spindlar".
* ^ Secord, James A. (2000). "Victorian Sensation: The
Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of
Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation". Chicago: University of
Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-74410-0 . Archived from the original on
16 May 2008.
* ^ A B C "taxonomy - Classification since Linnaeus biology".
* ^ "Fossil of world\'s earliest modern bird could help us
understand the extinction of dinosaurs".
* ^ Huxley, T. H. (1876): Lectures on Evolution. New York Tribune.
Extra. no 36. In Collected Essays IV: pp 46–138 original text w/
* ^ "
Thomas Henry Huxley
Thomas Henry Huxley British biologist". Encyclopedia
* ^ Rudwick, M. J. S. (1985). The Meaning of Fossils: Episodes in
the History of Palaeontology.
University of Chicago Press
University of Chicago Press . p. 24.
ISBN 0-226-73103-0 .
* ^ A B C Taylor, Mike. "What do terms like monophyletic,
paraphyletic and polyphyletic mean?". www.miketaylor.org.uk.
* ^ A B "
Polyphyletic vs. Monophyletic". ncse.com.
* ^ Queiroz, Philip D. Cantino, Kevin de. "The PhyloCode".
* ^ A B "PhyloCode: Concept, History and Advantages Taxonomy".
Biology Discussion. 2016-07-12.
* ^ A B C "Kingdom Classification of Living Organism". Biology
* ^ "
Carl Woese Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology".
* ^ Cracraft, Joel and Donaghue, Michael J. (eds.) (2004).
Assembling the Tree of Life. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
ISBN 0195172345 . pp. 45, 78, 555
* ^ A B Cavalier-Smith, T. (1998). "A revised six-kingdom system of
life". Biological Reviews. 73 (03): 203–66. PMID 9809012 . doi
* ^ Luketa S. (2012). "New views on the megaclassification of life"
(PDF). Protistology. 7 (4): 218–237.
* ^ Linnaeus, C. (1735). Systemae Naturae, sive regna tria naturae,
systematics proposita per classes, ordines, genera & species.
* ^ Haeckel, E. (1866). Generelle Morphologie der Organismen.
* ^ Chatton, É. (1925). "Pansporella perplexa. Réflexions sur la
biologie et la phylogénie des protozoaires". Annales des Sciences
Naturelles - Zoologie et Biologie Animale. 10-VII: 1–84.
* ^ Copeland, H. (1938). "The kingdoms of organisms". Quarterly
Review of Biology. 13: 383–420. doi :10.1086/394568 .
* ^ Whittaker, R. H. (January 1969). "New concepts of kingdoms of
organisms". Science. 163 (3863): 150–60. Bibcode
:1969Sci...163..150W. PMID 5762760 . doi :10.1126/science.163.3863.150
* ^ Woese, C.; Kandler, O.; Wheelis, M. (1990). "Towards a natural
system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and
Eucarya.". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America. 87 (12): 4576–9. Bibcode
:1990PNAS...87.4576W. PMC 54159 . PMID 2112744 . doi
* ^ Adl, S.M.; Simpson, A.G.B.; Lane, C.E.; Lukeš, J.; Bass, D.;
Bowser, S.S.; et al. (2015). "The revised classification of
eukaryotes" . Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 59: 429–493. PMC
3483872 . PMID 23020233 . doi :10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x .
CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. (link )
* ^ A B Ruggiero, M.A.; Gordon, D.P.; Orrell, T.M.; Bailly, N.;
Bourgoin, T.; Brusca, R.C.; et al. (2015). "A higher level
classification of all living organisms" . PLoS ONE. 10 (4): e0119248.
PMC 4418965 . PMID 25923521 . doi :10.1371/journal.pone.0119248 .
CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. (link )
* ^ "What is taxonomy?". Natural History Museum London.
* ^ "Mnemonic taxonomy / biology: Kingdom
Phylum Class Order...".
* ^ "ICZN Code". www.animalbase.uni-goettingen.de.
* ^ "International Code of
Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and
* ^ "How can I describe new species?". International Commission on
* ^ "taxonomy – Evaluating taxonomic characters biology".
* ^ A B "Editing Tip: Scientific Names of
Species AJE American
Journal Experts". www.aje.com.
* ^ "Carolus Linnaeus: Classification, Taxonomy & Contributions to
Biology – Video & Lesson Transcript Study.com". Study.com.
* ^ Biocyclopedia.com. "Biological Classification".
* ^ "Zoological nomenclature: a basic guide for non-taxonomist
* ^ "Classification". NCSU. Retrieved 27 April 2017.
* ^ "Molecular Marker Glossary".
University of Wyoming
University of Wyoming .
* ^ Wood, Dylan; King, Margaret; Landis, Drew; Courtney, William;
Wang, Runtang; Kelly, Ross; Turner, Jessica A.; Calhoun, Vince D.
(2014-08-26). "Harnessing modern web application technology to create
intuitive and efficient data visualization and sharing tools" .
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. 8. ISSN 1662-5196 . PMC 4144441 .
PMID 25206330 . doi :10.3389/fninf.2014.00071 .
* ^ "About – The
Plant List". www.theplantlist.org.
* ^ "About the Catalogue of Life: 2016 Annual Checklist". Catalogue
Integrated Taxonomic Information System
Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS). Retrieved 22
* Stace, Clive A. (1989) .
Plant taxonomy and biosystematics (2nd.
Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press . ISBN 9780521427852 .
Retrieved 29 April 2015.
* Datta, Subhash Chandra (1988). Systematic
Botany (4 ed.). New
Delhi: New Age Intl. ISBN 8122400132 . Retrieved 25 January 2015.
* Stuessy, Tod F. (2009).
Plant Taxonomy: The Systematic Evaluation
of Comparative Data. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-14712-0 .
Retrieved 6 February 2014.
Look up TAXONOMY in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikiquote has quotations related