HOME
The Info List - Stoics


--- Advertisement ---



Stoicism
Stoicism
is a school of Hellenistic philosophy
Hellenistic philosophy
that flourished throughout the Roman and Greek world until the 3rd century AD. Zeno of Citium founded stoicism in Athens
Athens
in the early 3rd century BC. It was heavily influenced by certain teachings of Socrates, while stoic physics are largely drawn from the teachings of the philosopher Heraclitus. Stoicism
Stoicism
is predominantly a philosophy of personal ethics informed by its system of logic and its views on the natural world. According to its teachings, as social beings, the path to happiness for humans is found in accepting this moment as it presents itself, by not allowing ourselves to be controlled by our desire for pleasure or our fear of pain, by using our minds to understand the world around us and to do our part in nature's plan, and by working together and treating others fairly and justly. The Stoics are especially known for teaching that "virtue is the only good" for human beings, and that external things—such as health, wealth, and pleasure—are not good or bad in themselves, but have value as "material for virtue to act upon". Alongside Aristotelian ethics, the Stoic tradition forms one of the major founding approaches to Western virtue ethics.[1] The Stoics also held that certain destructive emotions resulted from errors of judgment, and they believed people should aim to maintain a will (called prohairesis) that is "in accord with nature" (a slogan they interpreted to mean several different things). They thought the best indication of an individual's philosophy was not what a person said, but how a person behaved.[2] To live a good life, one had to understand the rules of the natural order since they taught everything was rooted in nature. Many Stoics—such as Seneca and Epictetus—emphasized that because "virtue is sufficient for happiness", a sage would be emotionally resilient to misfortune. This belief is similar to the meaning of the phrase "stoic calm", though the phrase does not include the "radical ethical" Stoic views that only a sage can be considered truly free, and that all moral corruptions are equally vicious.[3] From its founding, Stoic doctrine was popular during the Roman Empire—and its adherents included the Emperor Marcus Aurelius. It later experienced a decline after Christianity had become the state religion in the 4th century AD. Over the centuries, it has seen revivals, notably in the Renaissance
Renaissance
(Neostoicism) and in the modern era (modern Stoicism).[4]

Contents

1 Etymology 2 Basic tenets 3 History 4 Logic

4.1 Propositional logic 4.2 Categories 4.3 Epistemology

5 Physics, theology and cosmology 6 Ethics
Ethics
and virtues

6.1 The doctrine of "things indifferent" 6.2 Spiritual exercise

7 Social philosophy 8 Influence on Christianity 9 Modern usage 10 Stoic Philosophers 11 See also 12 References 13 Further reading

13.1 Primary sources 13.2 Studies

14 External links

Etymology[edit] Stoic comes from the Greek stōïkos, meaning "of the stoa [portico, or porch]". This, in turn, refers to the Stoa Poikile, or "Painted Stoa," in Athens, where the influential Stoic Zeno of Citium taught.[5][6] Basic tenets[edit]

Philosophy
Philosophy
does not promise to secure anything external for man, otherwise it would be admitting something that lies beyond its proper subject-matter. For as the material of the carpenter is wood, and that of statuary bronze, so the subject-matter of the art of living is each person's own life. ”

— Epictetus, Discourses 1.15.2, Robin Hard revised translation

The Stoics provided a unified account of the world, consisting of formal logic, monistic physics and naturalistic ethics. Of these, they emphasized ethics as the main focus of human knowledge, though their logical theories were of more interest for later philosophers. Stoicism
Stoicism
teaches the development of self-control and fortitude as a means of overcoming destructive emotions; the philosophy holds that becoming a clear and unbiased thinker allows one to understand the universal reason (logos). A primary aspect of Stoicism
Stoicism
involves improving the individual's ethical and moral well-being: "Virtue consists in a will that is in agreement with Nature."[7] This principle also applies to the realm of interpersonal relationships; "to be free from anger, envy, and jealousy,"[8] and to accept even slaves as "equals of other men, because all men alike are products of nature".[9] The Stoic ethic espouses a deterministic perspective; in regard to those who lack Stoic virtue, Cleanthes once opined that the wicked man is "like a dog tied to a cart, and compelled to go wherever it goes".[7] A Stoic of virtue, by contrast, would amend his will to suit the world and remain, in the words of Epictetus, "sick and yet happy, in peril and yet happy, dying and yet happy, in exile and happy, in disgrace and happy,"[8] thus positing a "completely autonomous" individual will, and at the same time a universe that is "a rigidly deterministic single whole". This viewpoint was later described as "Classical Pantheism" (and was adopted by Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza).[10] History[edit]

Antisthenes, founder of the Cynic school of philosophy

Stoicism
Stoicism
became the foremost popular philosophy among the educated elite in the Hellenistic world and the Roman Empire,[11] to the point where, in the words of Gilbert Murray
Gilbert Murray
"nearly all the successors of Alexander [...] professed themselves Stoics."[12] Beginning around 301 BC, Zeno taught philosophy at the Stoa Poikile ("Painted Porch"), from which his philosophy got its name.[13] Unlike the other schools of philosophy, such as the Epicureans, Zeno chose to teach his philosophy in a public space, which was a colonnade overlooking the central gathering place of Athens, the Agora. Zeno's ideas developed from those of the Cynics, whose founding father, Antisthenes, had been a disciple of Socrates. Zeno's most influential follower was Chrysippus, who was responsible for the molding of what is now called Stoicism. Later Roman Stoics focused on promoting a life in harmony within the universe, over which one has no direct control. Scholars usually divide the history of Stoicism
Stoicism
into three phases:

Early Stoa, from the founding of the school by Zeno to Antipater. Middle Stoa, including Panaetius
Panaetius
and Posidonius. Late Stoa, including Musonius Rufus, Seneca, Epictetus, and Marcus Aurelius.

No complete work by any Stoic philosopher survives from the first two phases of Stoicism. Only Roman texts from the Late Stoa survive.[14] Logic[edit] Propositional logic[edit] Diodorus Cronus, who was one of Zeno's teachers, is considered the philosopher who first introduced and developed an approach to logic now known as propositional logic, which is based on statements or propositions, rather than terms, making it very different from Aristotle's term logic. Later, Chrysippus
Chrysippus
developed a system that became known as Stoic logic and included a deductive system, Stoic Syllogistic, which was considered a rival to Aristotle's Syllogistic (see Syllogism). New interest in Stoic logic came in the 20th century, when important developments in logic were based on propositional logic. Susanne Bobzien wrote, "The many close similarities between Chrysippus' philosophical logic and that of Gottlob Frege
Gottlob Frege
are especially striking."[15] Bobzien also notes that " Chrysippus
Chrysippus
wrote over 300 books on logic, on virtually any topic logic today concerns itself with, including speech act theory, sentence analysis, singular and plural expressions, types of predicates, indexicals, existential propositions, sentential connectives, negations, disjunctions, conditionals, logical consequence, valid argument forms, theory of deduction, propositional logic, modal logic, tense logic, epistemic logic, logic of suppositions, logic of imperatives, ambiguity and logical paradoxes."[16] Categories[edit] Main article: Stoic categories The Stoics held that all being (ὄντα) – though not all things (τινά) – is material. They accepted the distinction between Abstract and concrete bodies, but rejected Aristotle's belief that purely incorporeal being exists. Thus, they accepted Anaxagoras' idea (as did Aristotle) that if an object is hot, it is because some part of a universal heat body had entered the object. But, unlike Aristotle, they extended the idea to cover all accidents. Thus if an object is red, it would be because some part of a universal red body had entered the object. They held that there were four categories.

substance (ὑποκείμενον)

The primary matter, formless substance, (ousia) that things are made of

quality (ποιόν)

The way matter is organized to form an individual object; in Stoic physics, a physical ingredient (pneuma: air or breath), which informs the matter

somehow disposed (πως ἔχον)

Particular characteristics, not present within the object, such as size, shape, action, and posture

“ Make for yourself a definition or description of the thing which is presented to you, so as to see distinctly what kind of a thing it is in its substance, in its nudity, in its complete entirety, and tell yourself its proper name, and the names of the things of which it has been compounded, and into which it will be resolved. For nothing is so productive of elevation of mind as to be able to examine methodically and truly every object that is presented to you in life, and always to look at things so as to see at the same time what kind of universe this is, and what kind of use everything performs in it, and what value everything has with reference to the whole. ”

— Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, iii. 11

Somehow disposed in relation to something (πρός τί πως ἔχον)

Characteristics related to other phenomena, such as the position of an object within time and space relative to other objects

Epistemology[edit] The Stoics propounded that knowledge can be attained through the use of reason. Truth
Truth
can be distinguished from fallacy—even if, in practice, only an approximation can be made. According to the Stoics, the senses constantly receive sensations: pulsations that pass from objects through the senses to the mind, where they leave an impression in the imagination (phantasia) (an impression arising from the mind was called a phantasma).[17] The mind has the ability to judge (συγκατάθεσις, synkatathesis)—approve or reject—an impression, enabling it to distinguish a true representation of reality from one that is false. Some impressions can be assented to immediately, but others can only achieve varying degrees of hesitant approval, which can be labeled belief or opinion (doxa). It is only through reason that we gain clear comprehension and conviction (katalepsis). Certain and true knowledge (episteme), achievable by the Stoic sage, can be attained only by verifying the conviction with the expertise of one's peers and the collective judgment of humankind. Physics, theology and cosmology[edit] Main article: Stoic physics See also: De Mundo According to the Stoics, the Universe
Universe
is a material, reasoning substance, known as God
God
or Nature, which the Stoics divided into two classes, the active and the passive. The passive substance is matter, which "lies sluggish, a substance ready for any use, but sure to remain unemployed if no one sets it in motion".[18] The active substance, which can be called Fate or Universal Reason
Reason
(Logos), is an intelligent aether or primordial fire, which acts on the passive matter:

The universe itself is God
God
and the universal outpouring of its soul; it is this same world's guiding principle, operating in mind and reason, together with the common nature of things and the totality that embraces all existence; then the foreordained might and necessity of the future; then fire and the principle of aether; then those elements whose natural state is one of flux and transition, such as water, earth, and air; then the sun, the moon, the stars; and the universal existence in which all things are contained. — Chrysippus, in Cicero, De Natura Deorum, i. 39

Everything is subject to the laws of Fate, for the Universe
Universe
acts according to its own nature, and the nature of the passive matter it governs. The souls of humans and animals are emanations from this primordial Fire, and are, likewise, subject to Fate:

Constantly regard the universe as one living being, having one substance and one soul; and observe how all things have reference to one perception, the perception of this one living being; and how all things act with one movement; and how all things are the cooperating causes of all things that exist; observe too the continuous spinning of the thread and the structure of the web. — Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, iv. 40

Individual souls are perishable by nature, and can be "transmuted and diffused, assuming a fiery nature by being received into the seminal reason ("logos spermatikos") of the Universe".[19] Since right Reason is the foundation of both humanity and the universe, it follows that the goal of life is to live according to Reason, that is, to live a life according to Nature. Stoic theology is a fatalistic and naturalistic pantheism: God
God
is never fully transcendent but always immanent, and identified with Nature. Abrahamic religions
Abrahamic religions
personalize God
God
as a world-creating entity, but Stoicism
Stoicism
equates God
God
with the totality of the universe; according to Stoic cosmology, which is very similar to the Hindu conception of existence, there is no absolute start to time, as it is considered infinite and cyclic. Similarly, the space and Universe
Universe
have neither start nor end, rather they are cyclical. The current Universe is a phase in the present cycle, preceded by an infinite number of Universes, doomed to be destroyed ("ekpyrōsis", conflagration) and re-created again,[20] and to be followed by another infinite number of Universes. Stoicism
Stoicism
considers all existence as cyclic, the cosmos as eternally self-creating and self-destroying (see also Eternal return). Stoicism, just like Indian religions
Indian religions
such as Hinduism, Buddhism
Buddhism
and Jainism, does not posit a beginning or end to the Universe.[21] According to the Stoics, the logos was the active reason or anima mundi pervading and animating the entire Universe. It was conceived as material and is usually identified with God
God
or Nature. The Stoics also referred to the seminal reason ("logos spermatikos"), or the law of generation in the Universe, which was the principle of the active reason working in inanimate matter. Humans, too, each possess a portion of the divine logos, which is the primordial Fire and reason that controls and sustains the Universe.[22] Ethics
Ethics
and virtues[edit] The ancient Stoics are often misunderstood because the terms they used pertained to different concepts in the past than they do today. The word "stoic" has come to mean "unemotional" or indifferent to pain because Stoic ethics taught freedom from "passion" by following "reason". The Stoics did not seek to extinguish emotions; rather, they sought to transform them by a resolute "askēsis" that enables a person to develop clear judgment and inner calm.[23] Logic, reflection, and concentration were the methods of such self-discipline. Borrowing from the Cynics, the foundation of Stoic ethics is that good lies in the state of the soul itself; in wisdom and self-control. Stoic ethics stressed the rule: "Follow where reason leads."[citation needed] One must therefore strive to be free of the passions, bearing in mind that the ancient meaning of "passion" was "anguish" or "suffering",[24] that is, "passively" reacting to external events, which is somewhat different from the modern use of the word. A distinction was made between pathos (plural pathe) which is normally translated as passion, propathos or instinctive reaction (e.g., turning pale and trembling when confronted by physical danger) and eupathos, which is the mark of the Stoic sage (sophos). The eupatheia are feelings that result from correct judgment in the same way that passions result from incorrect judgment. The idea was to be free of suffering through apatheia (Greek: ἀπάθεια; literally, "without passion") or peace of mind,[25] where peace of mind was understood in the ancient sense—being objective or having "clear judgment" and the maintenance of equanimity in the face of life's highs and lows. For the Stoics, reason meant not only using logic, but also understanding the processes of nature—the logos or universal reason, inherent in all things. Living according to reason and virtue, they held, is to live in harmony with the divine order of the universe, in recognition of the common reason and essential value of all people. The four cardinal virtues (aretai) of Stoic philosophy is a classification derived from the teachings of Plato
Plato
(Republic IV. 426–435):

Wisdom
Wisdom
(σοφία "sophia") Courage
Courage
(ανδρεία "andreia") Justice
Justice
(δικαιοσύνη "dikaiosyne") Temperance (σωφροσύνη "sophrosyne")

Following Socrates, the Stoics held that unhappiness and evil are the results of human ignorance of the reason in nature. If someone is unkind, it is because they are unaware of their own universal reason, which leads to the conclusion of kindness. The solution to evil and unhappiness then is the practice of Stoic philosophy: to examine one's own judgments and behavior and determine where they diverge from the universal reason of nature. The Stoics accepted that suicide was permissible for the wise person in circumstances that might prevent them from living a virtuous life.[26] Plutarch
Plutarch
held that accepting life under tyranny would have compromised Cato's self-consistency (constantia) as a Stoic and impaired his freedom to make the honorable moral choices.[27] Suicide could be justified if one fell victim to severe pain or disease,[26] but otherwise suicide would usually be seen as a rejection of one's social duty.[28] The doctrine of "things indifferent"[edit] Main article: Apatheia See also: Eudaimonia In philosophical terms, things that are indifferent are outside the application of moral law—that is without tendency to either promote or obstruct moral ends. Actions neither required nor forbidden by the moral law, or that do not affect morality, are called morally indifferent. The doctrine of things indifferent (ἀδιάφορα, adiaphora) arose in the Stoic school as a corollary of its diametric opposition of virtue and vice (καθήκοντα kathekon, "convenient actions", or actions in accordance with nature; and ἁμαρτήματα hamartemata, mistakes). As a result of this dichotomy, a large class of objects were left unassigned and thus regarded as indifferent. Eventually three sub-classes of "things indifferent" developed: things to prefer because they assist life according to nature; things to avoid because they hinder it; and things indifferent in the narrower sense. The principle of adiaphora was also common to the Cynics. Philipp Melanchthon
Philipp Melanchthon
revived the doctrine of things indifferent during the Renaissance. Spiritual exercise[edit]

Marcus Aurelius, the Stoic Roman emperor

Philosophy
Philosophy
for a Stoic is not just a set of beliefs or ethical claims, it is a way of life involving constant practice and training (or "askēsis"). Stoic philosophical and spiritual practices included logic, Socratic dialogue
Socratic dialogue
and self-dialogue, contemplation of death, training attention to remain in the present moment (similar to some forms of Buddhist meditation), and daily reflection on everyday problems and possible solutions. Philosophy
Philosophy
for a Stoic is an active process of constant practice and self-reminder. In his Meditations, Marcus Aurelius
Marcus Aurelius
defines several such practices. For example, in Book
Book
II.I:

Say to yourself in the early morning: I shall meet today ungrateful, violent, treacherous, envious, uncharitable men. All of the ignorance of real good and ill... I can neither be harmed by any of them, for no man will involve me in wrong, nor can I be angry with my kinsman or hate him; for we have come into the world to work together...

Prior to Aurelius, Epictetus
Epictetus
in his Discourses, distinguished between three types of act: judgment, desire, and inclination.[29] According to French philosopher Pierre Hadot, Epictetus
Epictetus
identifies these three acts with logic, physics and ethics respectively.[30] Hadot writes that in the Meditations, "Each maxim develops either one of these very characteristic topoi [i.e., acts], or two of them or three of them."[31] Seamus Mac Suibhne has described the practices of spiritual exercises as influencing those of reflective practice.[32] Robertson's The Philosophy
Philosophy
of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy details at length parallels between Stoic spiritual exercises and modern cognitive behavioral therapy.[33] Stoics were also known for consolatory orations, which were part of the consolatio literary tradition. Three such consolations by Seneca have survived. Social philosophy[edit] A distinctive feature of Stoicism
Stoicism
is its cosmopolitanism: All people are manifestations of the one universal spirit and should live in brotherly love and readily help one another according to the Stoics. In the Discourses, Epictetus
Epictetus
comments on man's relationship with the world: "Each human being is primarily a citizen of his own commonwealth; but he is also a member of the great city of gods and men, whereof the city political is only a copy."[34] This sentiment echoes that of Diogenes
Diogenes
of Sinope, who said, "I am not an Athenian or a Corinthian, but a citizen of the world."[35] They held that external differences such as rank and wealth are of no importance in social relationships. Instead, they advocated the brotherhood of humanity and the natural equality of all human beings. Stoicism
Stoicism
became the most influential school of the Greco-Roman world, and produced a number of remarkable writers and personalities, such as Cato the Younger
Cato the Younger
and Epictetus. In particular, they were noted for their urging of clemency toward slaves. Seneca exhorted, "Kindly remember that he whom you call your slave sprang from the same stock, is smiled upon by the same skies, and on equal terms with yourself breathes, lives, and dies."[36] Influence on Christianity[edit] See also: Neostoicism In his Introduction to the 1964 Penguin Classics edition of Meditations, the Anglican priest Maxwell Staniforth discussed the profound impact Stoicism
Stoicism
had on Christianity. He claimed the author of the Fourth Gospel declared Christ to be the Logos, which "had long been one of the leading terms of Stoicism, chosen originally for the purpose of explaining how deity came into relation with the universe".[37] In St. Ambrose
St. Ambrose
of Milan's Duties, "The voice is the voice of a Christian bishop, but the precepts are those of Zeno."[38][39] Regarding what he called "the Divine Spirit", Stanisforth wrote:

Cleanthes, wishing to give more explicit meaning to Zeno's 'creative fire', had been the first to hit upon the term pneuma, or 'spirit', to describe it. Like fire, this intelligent 'spirit' was imagined as a tenuous substance akin to a current of air or breath, but essentially possessing the quality of warmth; it was immanent in the universe as God, and in man as the soul and life-giving principle. Clearly it is not a long step from this to the 'Holy Spirit' of Christian theology, the 'Lord and Giver of life', visibly manifested as tongues of fire at Pentecost and ever since associated—in the Christian as in the Stoic mind—with the ideas of vital fire and beneficient warmth.[40]

Regarding the Trinity, Staniforth wrote:

Again in the doctrine of the Trinity, the ecclesiastical conception of Father, Word, and Spirit
Spirit
finds its germ in the different Stoic names of the Divine Unity. Thus Seneca, writing of the supreme Power which shapes the universe, states, 'This Power we sometimes call the All-ruling God, sometimes the incorporeal Wisdom, sometimes the holy Spirit, sometimes Destiny.' The Church had only to reject the last of these terms to arrive at its own acceptable definition of the Divine Nature; while the further assertion 'these three are One', which the modern mind finds paradoxical, was no more than commonplace to those familiar with Stoic notions.[40]

The apostle Paul met with Stoics during his stay in Athens, reported in Acts 17:16–18. In his letters, Paul reflected heavily from his knowledge of Stoic philosophy, using Stoic terms and metaphors to assist his new Gentile converts in their understanding of Christianity.[41] Stoic influence can also be seen in the works of St. Ambrose, Marcus Minucius Felix, and Tertullian.[42] The Fathers of the Church
Fathers of the Church
regarded Stoicism
Stoicism
as a "pagan philosophy";[43][44] nonetheless, early Christian writers employed some of the central philosophical concepts of Stoicism. Examples include the terms "logos", "virtue", "Spirit", and "conscience".[21] But the parallels go well beyond the sharing and borrowing of terminology. Both Stoicism
Stoicism
and Christianity assert an inner freedom in the face of the external world, a belief in human kinship with Nature or God, a sense of the innate depravity—or "persistent evil"—of humankind,[21] and the futility and temporary nature of worldly possessions and attachments. Both encourage Ascesis with respect to the passions and inferior emotions such as lust, and envy, so that the higher possibilities of one's humanity can be awakened and developed. Stoic writings such as Meditations
Meditations
by Marcus Aurelius
Marcus Aurelius
have been highly regarded by many Christians throughout the centuries. The Eastern Orthodox Church and Oriental Orthodox Church
Oriental Orthodox Church
accept Stoic ideal of dispassion to this day. Roman Stoics taught that sex is just within marriage, for unitive and procreative purposes only.[45] This teaching is accepted by Catholic Church to this day.[46] Saint Ambrose
Ambrose
of Milan was known for applying Stoic philosophy to his theology. Modern usage[edit] The word "stoic" commonly refers to someone indifferent to pain, pleasure, grief, or joy.[47] The modern usage as "person who represses feelings or endures patiently" was first cited in 1579 as a noun, and 1596 as an adjective.[48] In contrast to the term "Epicurean", the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's entry on Stoicism
Stoicism
notes, "the sense of the English adjective 'stoical' is not utterly misleading with regard to its philosophical origins."[49] Stoic Philosophers[edit] Main article: List of Stoic philosophers

Zeno of Citium
Zeno of Citium
(332–262 BC), founder of Stoicism
Stoicism
and the Stoic Academy (Stoa) in Athens Aristo of Chios (fl. 260 BC), pupil of Zeno; Herillus of Carthage (fl. 3rd century BC) Cleanthes (of Assos) (330–232 BC), second head of Stoic Academy Chrysippus
Chrysippus
(280–204 BC), third head of the academy Diogenes of Babylon (230–150 BC) Antipater of Tarsus (210–129 BC) Panaetius
Panaetius
of Rhodes (185–109 BC) Posidonius
Posidonius
of Apameia (c. 135 BC – 51 BC) Diodotus (c. 120 BC – 59 BC), teacher of Cicero Cato the Younger
Cato the Younger
(94–46 BC) Seneca (4 BC – AD 65) Gaius Musonius Rufus
Musonius Rufus
(1st century AD) Rubellius Plautus (AD 33–62) Publius Clodius Thrasea Paetus
Publius Clodius Thrasea Paetus
(1st century AD) Lucius Annaeus Cornutus (1st century AD) Epictetus
Epictetus
(AD 55–135) Hierocles (2nd century AD) Marcus Aurelius
Marcus Aurelius
(AD 121–180)

See also[edit]

4 Maccabees Dehellenization Deixis Glossary of Stoic terms Ekpyrosis, palingenesis, apocatastasis Ekpyrotic universe (cosmological theory) List of Stoic philosophers Megarian school Oikeiôsis Paradoxa Stoicorum Plank of Carneades Pneuma Sage (philosophy) Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta "Stoic Opposition"

References[edit]

^ Sharpe, Matthew. “Stoic Virtue
Virtue
Ethics.” Handbook of Virtue Ethics, 2013, 28–41. ^ John Sellars. Stoicism, p. 32. ^ Stoicism, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ^ Becker, Lawrence C. (2001). A New Stoicism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400822447.  ^ https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stoic ^ Williamson, D. (1 April 2015). Kant's Theory of Emotion: Emotional Universalism. Palgrave Macmillan US. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-137-49810-6.  ^ a b Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy, p. 254 ^ a b Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy, p. 264 ^ Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy, p. 253. ^ Charles Hartshorne and William Reese, "Philosophers Speak of God," Humanity Books, 1953 ch 4 ^ Amos, H. (1982). These Were the Greeks. Chester Springs: Dufour Editions. ISBN 978-0-8023-1275-4. OCLC 9048254.  ^ Gilbert Murray, The Stoic Philosophy
Philosophy
(1915), p. 25. In Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy
Philosophy
(1946). ^ Becker, Lawrence (2003). A History of Western Ethics. New York: Routledge. p. 27. ISBN 978-0-415-96825-6.  ^ A.A.Long, Hellenistic Philosophy, p. 115. ^ [1] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Susanne Bobzien, Ancient Logic ^ [2] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Susanne Bobzien, Ancient Logic ^ Diogenes Laërtius
Diogenes Laërtius
(2000). Lives of eminent philosophers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.  VII.49 ^ Seneca, Epistles, lxv. 2. ^ Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, iv. 21. ^ Michael Lapidge, Stoic Cosmology, in: John M. Rist, The Stoics, Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 182–183. ^ a b c Ferguson, Everett. Backgrounds of Early Christianity. 2003, p. 368. ^ Tripolitis, A., Religions of the Hellenistic-Roman Age, pp. 37–38. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. ^ Graver, Margaret (2009). Stoicism
Stoicism
and Emotion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-30558-5. OCLC 430497127.  ^ "Passion". Merriam-Webster. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved January 29, 2011.  ^ Seddon, Keith (2005). Epictetus' Handbook and the Tablet of Cebes. New York: Routledge. p. 217. ISBN 978-0-415-32451-9. OCLC 469313282.  ^ a b Don E. Marietta, (1998), Introduction to ancient philosophy, pp. 153–54. Sharpe ^ "Cato's suicide in Plutarch
Plutarch
AV Zadorojnyi". The Classical Quarterly. 2007  ^ William Braxton Irvine, (2009), A guide to the good life: the ancient art of Stoic joy, p. 200. Oxford University Press ^ Davidson, A.I. (1995) Pierre Hadot
Pierre Hadot
and the Spiritual Phenomenon of Ancient Philosophy, in Philosophy
Philosophy
as a Way of Life, Hadot, P. Oxford Blackwells, pp. 9–10 ^ Hadot, P. (1992) La Citadelle intérieure. Introduction aux Pensées de Marc Aurèle. Paris, Fayard, pp. 106–15 ^ Hadot, P. (1987) Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Paris, 2nd ed., p. 135. ^ Mac Suibhne, S. (2009). "'Wrestle to be the man philosophy wished to make you': Marcus Aurelius, reflective practitioner". Reflective Practice. 10 (4): 429–36. doi:10.1080/14623940903138266.  ^ Robertson, D (2010). The Philosophy
Philosophy
of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: Stoicism
Stoicism
as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy. London: Karnac. ISBN 978-1-85575-756-1.  ^ Epictetus, Discourses, ii. 5. 26 ^ Epictetus, Discourses, i. 9. 1 ^ Seneca, Moral letters to Lucilius, Letter 47: On master and slave, 10, circa AD 65. ^ Marcus Aurelius
Marcus Aurelius
(1964). Meditations. London: Penguin Books. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-140-44140-6.  ^ "On the Duties of the Clergy". www.newadvent.org. Retrieved 2017-03-01.  ^ Aurelius, Marcus (1964). Meditations. London: Penguin Books. p. 26. ISBN 978-0-140-44140-6.  ^ a b Marcus Aurelius
Marcus Aurelius
(1964). Meditations. London: Penguin Books. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-140-44140-6.  ^ Kee, Howard and Franklin W. Young, Understanding The New Testament, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, Inc. 1958, p. 208. ISBN 978-0139365911 ^ Encyclopædia Britannica. Stoicism. §Stoic elements in Pauline and patristic thought ^ Agathias. Histories, 2.31. ^ David, Sedley. "Ancient philosophy". In E. Craig. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 2008-10-18.  ^ Musonius Rufus. “Lecture XII "On Sexual Indulgence".” Musonius Rufus: The Roman Socrates
Socrates
(Lectures and Fragments), Introduction and Translation by Cora E. Lutz, From Volume X of the Yale Classical Studies, Yale University Press, 1947 ^ "CCC, 2366". Vatican.va.  ^ " Modern Stoicism Build The Fire". Build The Fire. 2016-02-09. Retrieved 2016-06-22.  ^ Harper, Douglas (November 2001). "Online Etymology Dictionary – Stoic". Retrieved 2006-09-02.  ^ Baltzly, Dirk (2004-12-13). "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Stoicism". Retrieved 2006-09-02. 

Further reading[edit] Primary sources[edit]

A. A. Long and D. N. Sedley, The Hellenistic Philosophers Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. Inwood, Brad & Gerson LLoyd P. (eds.) The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia Indianapolis: Hackett 2008. Long, George Enchiridion by Epictetus, Prometheus Books, Reprint Edition, January 1955. Gill C. Epictetus, The Discourses, Everyman 1995. Irvine, William, A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) ISBN 978-0-19-537461-2 Hadas, Moses (ed.), Essential Works of Stoicism, Bantam Books 1961. Harvard University Press
Harvard University Press
Epictetus
Epictetus
Discourses Books 1 and 2, Loeb Classical Library Nr. 131, June 1925. Harvard University Press
Harvard University Press
Epictetus
Epictetus
Discourses Books 3 and 4, Loeb Classical Library Nr. 218, June 1928. Long, George, Discourses of Epictetus, Kessinger Publishing, January 2004. Lucius Annaeus Seneca the Younger
Seneca the Younger
(transl. Robin Campbell), Letters from a Stoic: Epistulae Morales Ad Lucilium (1969, reprint 2004) ISBN 0-14-044210-3 Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, translated by Maxwell Staniforth; ISBN 0-14-044140-9, or translated by Gregory Hays; ISBN 0-679-64260-9. Oates, Whitney Jennings, The Stoic and Epicurean Philosophers, The Complete Extant Writings of Epicurus, Epictetus, Lucretius
Lucretius
and Marcus Aurelius, Random House, 9th printing 1940.

Studies[edit]

Bakalis, Nikolaos, Handbook of Greek Philosophy: From Thales
Thales
to the Stoics. Analysis and Fragments, Trafford Publishing, May 2005, ISBN 1-4120-4843-5 Becker, Lawrence C., A New Stoicism
Stoicism
(Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1998) ISBN 0-691-01660-7 Brennan, Tad, The Stoic Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005; paperback 2006) Brooke, Christopher. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism
Stoicism
and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rousseau (Princeton UP, 2012) excerpts Inwood, Brad (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to The Stoics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) Lachs, John, Stoic Pragmatism
Pragmatism
(Indiana University Press, 2012) ISBN 0-253-22376-8 Long, A. A., Stoic Studies (Cambridge University Press, 1996; repr. University of California Press, 2001) ISBN 0-520-22974-6 Robertson, Donald, The Philosophy
Philosophy
of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: Stoicism
Stoicism
as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy (London: Karnac, 2010) ISBN 978-1-85575-756-1 Sellars, John, Stoicism
Stoicism
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006) ISBN 1-84465-053-7 Stephens, William O., Stoic Ethics: Epictetus
Epictetus
and Happiness as Freedom (London: Continuum, 2007) ISBN 0-8264-9608-3 Strange, Steven (ed.), Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004) ISBN 0-521-82709-4 Zeller, Eduard; Reichel, Oswald J., The Stoics, Epicureans
Epicureans
and Sceptics, Longmans, Green, and Co., 1892

External links[edit]

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Stoicism

Baltzly, Dirk. "Stoicism". In Zalta, Edward N. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.  "Stoicism". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.  "Stoic Ethics". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.  "Stoic Philosophy
Philosophy
of Mind". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.   Hicks, Robert Drew (1911). "Stoics". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.).  The Stoic Library The Rebirth of Stoicism Stoic Logic: The Dialectic from Zeno to Chrysippus Annotated Bibliography on Ancient Stoic Dialectic "A bibliography on Stoicism
Stoicism
by the Stoic Foundation". Archived from the original on 30 September 2012.  BBC Radio 4's In Our Time
Time
programme on Stoicism
Stoicism
(requires Flash) An introduction to Stoic Philosophy Online Stoic Community: New Stoa Stoicism
Stoicism
Today Project

v t e

Stoicism

Philosophers

Early

Zeno of Citium Persaeus Aristo Sphaerus Herillus Cleanthes Chrysippus Zeno of Tarsus Crates of Mallus Diogenes
Diogenes
of Babylon Apollodorus Antipater of Tarsus Diotimus the Stoic

Middle

Panaetius Dardanus Mnesarchus Hecato Posidonius Diodotus Geminus Antipater of Tyre Athenodoros Cananites

Late

Seneca Cornutus Musonius Rufus Euphrates Cleomedes Epictetus Hierocles Sextus Junius Rusticus Marcus Aurelius

Philosophy

Stoicism

categories passions physics

Neostoicism

Concepts

Adiaphora Apatheia Ataraxia Ekpyrosis Eudaimonia Katalepsis Kathekon Logos Oikeiôsis Pneuma Prohairesis Sophos

Works

De Brevitate Vitae (Seneca) Discourses (Epictetus) Enchiridion (Epictetus) Epistles (Seneca) Meditations
Meditations
(Marcus Aurelius) The Republic (Zeno)

Related articles

Paradoxa Stoicorum Seneca's Consolations Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta

v t e

Ancient Greek schools of philosophy

Pre-Socratic

Schools

Atomism Eleatics Ionian

Ephesian Milesian

Pluralism Pythagoreanism Sophistic

Philosophers

Anaxagoras Anaximander Anaximenes Democritus Empedocles Heraclitus Leucippus Melissus Parmenides Protagoras Pythagoras Thales Zeno of Elea

Socratic

Schools

Cynicism Cyrenaics Eretrian school Megarian school Peripateticism Platonism

Philosophers

Antisthenes Aristippus Aristotle Diogenes
Diogenes
of Sinope Euclid of Megara Phaedo of Elis Plato Socrates

Hellenistic

Schools

Epicureanism Neoplatonism Neopythagoreanism Pyrrhonism Stoicism

Philosophers

Apollonius of Tyana Augustine Epictetus Epicurus John Philoponus Lucretius Plotinus Proclus Pyrrho Sextus Empiricus Zeno of Citium

v t e

Philosophy

Branches

Traditional

Metaphysics

Ontology

Epistemology Logic Ethics Aesthetics

Philosophy
Philosophy
of

Action Art

Culture Design Music Film

Business Color Cosmos Dialogue Education Environment Futility Happiness Healthcare History Human
Human
nature Humor Feminism Language Life Literature Mathematics Mind

Pain Psychology

Philosophy
Philosophy
of psychiatry Philosophy
Philosophy
of perception Philosophy Religion Science

Physics Chemistry Biology Geography

Sexuality Social science

Culture Economics Justice Law Politics Society

Space
Space
and time Sport Technology

Artificial intelligence Computer science Engineering Information

War

Schools of thought

By era

Ancient Western

Medieval Renaissance Early modern Modern Contemporary

Ancient

Chinese

Agriculturalism Confucianism Legalism Logicians Mohism Chinese naturalism Neotaoism Taoism Yangism Zen

Greco-Roman

Aristotelianism Atomism Cynicism Cyrenaics Eleatics Eretrian school Epicureanism Hermeneutics Ionian

Ephesian Milesian

Megarian school Neoplatonism Peripatetic Platonism Pluralism Presocratic Pyrrhonism Pythagoreanism Neopythagoreanism Sophistic Stoicism

Indian

Samkhya Nyaya Vaisheshika Yoga Mīmāṃsā Ājīvika Ajñana Cārvāka Jain

Anekantavada Syādvāda

Buddhist

Śūnyatā Madhyamaka Yogacara Sautrāntika Svatantrika

Persian

Mazdakism Zoroastrianism Zurvanism

Medieval

European

Christian philosophy Scholasticism Thomism Renaissance
Renaissance
humanism

East Asian

Korean Confucianism Edo Neo-Confucianism Neo-Confucianism

Indian

Vedanta

Acintya bheda abheda Advaita Bhedabheda Dvaita Dvaitadvaita Shuddhadvaita Vishishtadvaita

Navya-Nyāya

Islamic

Averroism Avicennism Illuminationism ʿIlm al-Kalām Sufi

Jewish

Judeo-Islamic

Modern

People

Cartesianism Kantianism Neo-Kantianism Hegelianism Marxism Spinozism

0

Anarchism Classical Realism Liberalism Collectivism Conservatism Determinism Dualism Empiricism Existentialism Foundationalism Historicism Holism Humanism Idealism

Absolute British German Objective Subjective Transcendental

Individualism Kokugaku Materialism Modernism Monism Naturalism Natural law Nihilism New Confucianism Neo-Scholasticism Pragmatism Phenomenology Positivism Reductionism Rationalism Social contract Socialism Transcendentalism Utilitarianism

Contemporary

Analytic

Applied ethics Analytic feminism Analytical Marxism Communitarianism Consequentialism Critical rationalism Experimental philosophy Falsificationism Foundationalism / Coherentism Generative linguistics Internalism and Externalism Logical positivism Legal positivism Normative ethics Meta-ethics Moral realism Neo-Aristotelian Quinean naturalism Ordinary language philosophy Postanalytic philosophy Quietism Rawlsian Reformed epistemology Systemics Scientism Scientific realism Scientific skepticism Contemporary utilitarianism Vienna Circle Wittgensteinian

Continental

Critical theory Deconstruction Existentialism Feminist Frankfurt School New Historicism Hermeneutics Neo-Marxism Phenomenology Postmodernism Post-structuralism Social constructionism Structuralism Western Marxism

Other

Kyoto School Objectivism Russian cosmism more...

Positions

Aesthetics

Formalism Institutionalism Aesthetic response

Ethics

Consequentialism Deontology Virtue

Free will

Compatibilism Determinism Libertarianism

Metaphysics

Atomism Dualism Monism Naturalism

Epistemology

Constructivism Empiricism Idealism Particularism Fideism Rationalism / Reasonism Skepticism Solipsism

Mind

Behaviorism Emergentism Eliminativism Epiphenomenalism Functionalism Objectivism Subjectivism

Normativity

Absolutism Particularism Relativism Nihilism Skepticism Universalism

Ontology

Action Event Process

Reality

Anti-realism Conceptualism Idealism Materialism Naturalism Nominalism Physicalism Realism

Philosophy
Philosophy
by region Philosophy-related lists Miscellaneous

By region

African Ethiopian Aztec Native America Eastern Chinese Egyptian Czech Indian Indonesian Iranian Japanese Korean Vietnam Pakistani Western American Australian British Danish French German Greek Italian Polish Romanian Russian Slovene Spanish Turkish

Lists

Outline Index Years Problems Schools Glossary Philosophers Movements Publications

Miscellaneous

Women in philosophy Sage (philosophy)

Portal Category Book

v t e

Philosophy
Philosophy
of language

Philosophers

Plato
Plato
(Cratylus) Gorgias Confucius Xunzi Aristotle Stoics Pyrrhonists Scholasticism Ibn Rushd Ibn Khaldun Thomas Hobbes Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Johann Herder Ludwig Noiré Wilhelm von Humboldt Fritz Mauthner Paul Ricœur Ferdinand de Saussure Gottlob Frege Franz Boas Paul Tillich Edward Sapir Leonard Bloomfield Zhuangzi Henri Bergson Lev Vygotsky Ludwig Wittgenstein

Philosophical Investigations Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

Bertrand Russell Rudolf Carnap Jacques Derrida

Of Grammatology Limited Inc

Benjamin Lee Whorf Gustav Bergmann J. L. Austin Noam Chomsky Hans-Georg Gadamer Saul Kripke A. J. Ayer G. E. M. Anscombe Jaakko Hintikka Michael Dummett Donald Davidson Roger Gibson Paul Grice Gilbert Ryle P. F. Strawson Willard Van Orman Quine Hilary Putnam David Lewis John Searle Joxe Azurmendi Scott Soames Stephen Yablo John Hawthorne Stephen Neale Paul Watzlawick

Theories

Causal theory of reference Contrast theory of meaning Contrastivism Conventionalism Cratylism Deconstruction Descriptivist theory of names Direct reference theory Dramatism Expressivism Linguistic determinism Logical atomism Logical positivism Mediated reference theory Nominalism Non-cognitivism Phallogocentrism Quietism Relevance theory Semantic externalism Semantic holism Structuralism Supposition theory Symbiosism Theological noncognitivism Theory of descriptions Verification theory

Concepts

Ambiguity Linguistic relativity Meaning Language Truth-bearer Proposition Use–mention distinction Concept Categories Set Class Intension Logical form Metalanguage Mental representation Principle of compositionality Property Sign Sense
Sense
and reference Speech act Symbol Entity Sentence Statement more...

Related articles

Analytic philosophy Philosophy
Philosophy
of information Philosophical logic Linguistics Pragmatics Rhetoric Semantics Formal semantics Semiotics

Category Task Force Discussion

v t e

Philosophy
Philosophy
of science

Concepts

Analysis Analytic–synthetic distinction A priori and a posteriori Causality Commensurability Consilience Construct Creative synthesis Demarcation problem Empirical evidence Explanatory power Fact Falsifiability Feminist method Ignoramus et ignorabimus Inductive reasoning Intertheoretic reduction Inquiry Nature Objectivity Observation Paradigm Problem of induction Scientific law Scientific method Scientific revolution Scientific theory Testability Theory choice Theory-ladenness Underdetermination Unity of science

Metatheory of science

Coherentism Confirmation holism Constructive empiricism Constructive realism Constructivist epistemology Contextualism Conventionalism Deductive-nomological model Hypothetico-deductive model Inductionism Epistemological anarchism Evolutionism Fallibilism Foundationalism Instrumentalism Pragmatism Model-dependent realism Naturalism Physicalism Positivism / Reductionism / Determinism Rationalism / Empiricism Received view / Semantic view of theories Scientific realism / Anti-realism Scientific essentialism Scientific formalism Scientific skepticism Scientism Structuralism Uniformitarianism Vitalism

Philosophy
Philosophy
of

Physics

thermal and statistical Motion

Chemistry Biology Environment Geography Social science Technology

Engineering Artificial intelligence Computer science

Information Mind Psychiatry Psychology Perception Space
Space
and time

Related topics

Alchemy Criticism of science Epistemology Faith and rationality History and philosophy of science History of science History of evolutionary thought Logic Metaphysics Pseudoscience Relationship between religion and science Rhetoric
Rhetoric
of science Sociology of scientific knowledge Sociology of scientific ignorance

Philosophers of science by era

Ancient

Plato Aristotle Stoicism Epicureans

Medieval

Averroes Avicenna Roger Bacon William of Ockham Hugh of Saint Victor Dominicus Gundissalinus Robert Kilwardby

Early modern

Francis Bacon Thomas Hobbes René Descartes Galileo Galilei Pierre Gassendi Isaac Newton David Hume

Classical modern

Immanuel Kant Friedrich Schelling William Whewell Auguste Comte John Stuart Mill Herbert Spencer Wilhelm Wundt Charles Sanders Peirce Wilhelm Windelband Henri Poincaré Pierre Duhem Rudolf Steiner Karl Pearson

Late modern

Alfred North Whitehead Bertrand Russell Albert Einstein Otto Neurath C. D. Broad Michael Polanyi Hans Reichenbach Rudolf Carnap Karl Popper Carl Gustav Hempel W. V. O. Quine Thomas Kuhn Imre Lakatos Paul Feyerabend Jürgen Habermas Ian Hacking Bas van Fraassen Larry Laudan Daniel Dennett

Portal Category

Authority control

.