HOME
The Info List - Serbian Nationalism


--- Advertisement ---



Serbian nationalism
Serbian nationalism
or Serbdom (Serbian: српство / srpstvo) asserts that Serbs
Serbs
are a nation and promotes the cultural unity of Serbs.[1] It is an ethnic nationalism,[1] originally arising in the context of the general rise of nationalism in the Balkans under Ottoman rule, under the influence of Serbian linguist Vuk Stefanović Karadžić and Ilija Garašanin.[1] Serbian nationalism
Serbian nationalism
was an important factor during the Balkan Wars
Balkan Wars
which contributed to the decline of the Ottoman Empire, during World War I, the Austro-Hungarian Empire
Austro-Hungarian Empire
after World War I
World War I
and again during the breakup of Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
and the Yugoslav Wars
Yugoslav Wars
of the 1990s.[2] After 1878, Serbian nationalists merged their goals with those of Yugoslavists, and emulated the Piedmont's leading role in the Risorgimento
Risorgimento
of Italy, by claiming that Serbia
Serbia
sought not only to unite all Serbs
Serbs
in one state, but that Serbia
Serbia
intended to be a South Slavic Piedmont that would unite all South Slavs
South Slavs
in one state known as Yugoslavia.[1] Serbian nationalists supported a centralized Yugoslav state that guaranteed the unity of the Serbs
Serbs
while resisting efforts to decentralize the state.[1] The Vidovdan Constitution
Vidovdan Constitution
adopted by Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
in 1920, consolidated the country as a centralized state under the Serbian Karađorđević monarchy.[3] Others in Yugoslavia opposed the centralized state and demanded decentralization, including Croatian nationalists who demanded an autonomous Croatia within Yugoslavia, that was accepted by the Yugoslav government in the Cvetković–Maček Agreement
Cvetković–Maček Agreement
of 1939.[4] Serbian nationalists opposed the agreement on the grounds that it weakened the unity of Serbdom, asserting its importance to Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
with the slogan "Strong Serbdom, Strong Yugoslavia".[3] The invasion and partition of Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
in World War II, resulted in violent ethnic conflict between nationalist Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks, and others, resulting in a highly violent sectarian variant of Serbian nationalism
Serbian nationalism
rising in the Chetnik
Chetnik
movement.[3] The decentralization of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in the 1960s and the suppression of all ethnic nationalist sentiments led to a Serbian nationalist backlash and resurgence in the 1980s, that condemned post- World War II
World War II
Yugoslavism
Yugoslavism
and the decentralization of Yugoslavia.[3][3] Upon Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
collapsing in the 1990s with multiple republics seeking secession, Serbian nationalists demanded that all Serbs
Serbs
in all the Yugoslav republics had the right to be united in a common state, ethnic conflict occurred between Serbs seeking unity with Serbia
Serbia
and other Yugoslav ethnicities seeking independence.[5]

Contents

1 History

1.1 19th century 1.2 World War I 1.3 Yugoslavia 1.4 Breakup of Yugoslavia
Breakup of Yugoslavia
and Yugoslav Wars

2 Mottos 3 See also 4 Notes 5 References 6 Further reading 7 External links

History[edit] 19th century[edit] Further information: Rise of nationalism in the Balkans
Rise of nationalism in the Balkans
and Serbian historiography

Portrait of Vuk Stefanović Karadžić, the founder of Serbian nationalism.

The origins of Serbian nationalism
Serbian nationalism
date back to the 19th century beginning with the 1804 uprisings by Serbs
Serbs
against Ottoman rule that eventually led to the creation of an independent Serbian state in 1878.[2] However Serbian nationalists themselves cite the origins of the movement as being the Battle of Kosovo
Battle of Kosovo
on Serbian national and religious holiday Vidovdan
Vidovdan
(Saint Vitus Day) in 1389 between Serbia and the Ottoman Empire, the battle that holds important symbolic meaning to Serbian nationalists.[1] The Serbian linguist Vuk Stefanović Karadžić is commonly considered the father of Serbian nationalism.[1] Karadžić created a linguistic definition of the Serbs
Serbs
that included all speakers of the Štokavian dialect
Štokavian dialect
regardless of their religious affiliation or geographical origin.[1] However Karadžić acknowledged the right of some Štokavian-speaking peoples to call themselves names other than Serbs.[1] Ilija Garašanin
Ilija Garašanin
was another early proponent of Serbian nationalism
Serbian nationalism
and a proponent of a Greater Serbia
Greater Serbia
- a Serbian state whose borders were extended to include all Serbs
Serbs
in the Balkan region.[1] After Serbia
Serbia
was recognized as an independent state in 1878, both South Slavs
South Slavs
and the Serbian government considered their peoples in Habsburg-ruled Austria-Hungary
Austria-Hungary
to be under occupation resulting in increasing antagonism between Serbia
Serbia
and Austria-Hungary
Austria-Hungary
from the late 19th century to the early 20th century.[1] World War I[edit] In 1914 Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated by Bosnian Serb revolutionary Gavrilo Princip
Gavrilo Princip
resulting in Austria-Hungary accusing Serbia
Serbia
of involvement and subsequently declaring war on Serbia, resulting in a clash of alliances and the eruption of World War I.[3] In spite of heavy casualties, Serbia
Serbia
benefited from its allies' eventual victory against Germany and Austria-Hungary, with Serbia
Serbia
subsequently joining with territories claimed by Yugoslav nationalists to form the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, informally known as Yugoslavia, in 1918.[3] Serbian nationalists associated with a centralist vision of Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
as opposed to a confederal or federal state as advocated by non-Serbs.[3] The antagonism between a centralized Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
supported by Serbian nationalists and a decentralized Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
supported by Croatian and Slovenian nationalists was the main cause of unstable governance in Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
during the interwar period.[3] Yugoslavia[edit] In 1920, the centralized vision of Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
as supported by Serbian nationalists was enacted in the Constitution of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes passed on Saint Vitus Day
Saint Vitus Day
that became known as the "St. Vitus Day Constitution" (Vidovdanski ustav).[3] Antagonism which rose between Serbian nationalists versus Croatian and Slovenian nationalists culminated in the 1928 assassination of Stjepan Radić on the floor of the Yugoslav parliament and the subsequent deterioration of parliamentary democracy in the country.[3] In the aftermath King Alexander discarded the St. Vitus Day Constitution, proclaimed a royal dictatorship, and officially renamed the country Kingdom of Yugoslavia.[3] King Alexander pursued a policy of encouraging modern Yugoslav nationalism which caused dissatisfaction amongst Serbian nationalists who saw Yugoslav nationalism as a disavowal of Serbian nationalism.[3] Serbian nationalists were outraged at the Cvetković–Maček Agreement
Cvetković–Maček Agreement
between Serb and Croat political leaders that created the Banovina of Croatia, an autonomous province within the kingdom which gave Croatia virtual autonomy.[3] In response, Serbian nationalists founded the Serb Cultural Club which attacked the new Yugoslav nationalism under the motto of "Strong Serbdom, Strong Yugoslavia".[3] Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
was invaded and occupied by the Axis Powers
Axis Powers
during World War II, with Nazi Germany
Nazi Germany
establishing puppet states throughout occupied Yugoslavia.[3] Serbian nationalism
Serbian nationalism
rose in a militant response by the Chetnik
Chetnik
forces of Draža Mihailović
Draža Mihailović
against both the Axis forces and the communist Yugoslav Partisans.[3] The war saw the rise of an extreme anti-Muslim variant of Serbian nationalism practised by the Chetniks who massacred Bosnian Muslims during the war.[3] In the aftermath of World War II
World War II
and the seizure of power by the Yugoslav Partisans, Josip Broz Tito's communist Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
was established. The new regime repressed nationalism of any culture that was deemed to be a threat to the state.[3] Serbian nationalism
Serbian nationalism
then developed during the 1960s by intellectuals such as Dobrica Ćosić and challenged the state-sponsored policies of Yugoslavism
Yugoslavism
and "Brotherhood and Unity".[3] Tito's later expulsion of the nationalist-leaning Serbian communist official Aleksandar Ranković
Aleksandar Ranković
in the 1960s was perceived as an attack on Serbian nationalism.[3] After the ousting of Ranković, Serbian nationalist intellectuals increasingly began viewing Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
as a detrimental experience for the Serb nation.[3] Serbian nationalism
Serbian nationalism
escalated following the death of Tito in 1980.[6] Serbian intellectuals began breaking a number of taboos—for example, Branko Petranović identified Mihailović, the Chetnik
Chetnik
rival of Tito during World War II
World War II
as being an important "anti-fascist".[6] Dobrica Ćosić joined other Serb political writers in writing the highly controversial Memorandum of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts of 1986.[7] The Memorandum claimed to promote solutions to restore Yugoslav unity, but it focused on fiercely condemning Titoist Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
of having economically subjugated Serbia
Serbia
to Croatia and Slovenia and accused ethnic Albanians of committing genocide against Serbs
Serbs
in Kosovo.[8] The Memorandum was harshly condemned by the ruling League of Communists of Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
as well as the government of Serbia led by Ivan Stambolić.[9] Members who would later support Serbian nationalism chose follow the party line and denounced the Memorandum as well. Slobodan Milošević, at the time a Serbian communist official, did not speak publicly about the issue, but in a meeting with members of the secret police he formally endorsed the official government denouncement of the Memorandum, stating:

The appearance of the Memorandum of the Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences represents nothing else but the darkest nationalism. It means the liquidation of the current socialist system of our country, that is the disintegration after which there is no survival for any nation or nationality. ... Tito's policy of brotherhood and unity ... is the only basis on which Yugoslavia’s survival can be secured.[9]

Slobodan Milošević, President of Serbia
President of Serbia
(1989–1997), President of FR Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
(1997–2000).

Breakup of Yugoslavia
Breakup of Yugoslavia
and Yugoslav Wars[edit]

Radovan Karadžić
Radovan Karadžić
in 1994, President of Republika Srpska (1992–1996).

However, amidst the rising nationalist sentiment in Serbia
Serbia
in 1987, Milošević became their major spokesperson in the communist establishment.[10] Milošević supported the premises of the Memorandum that included promoting centralization of power in the federal Yugoslav government to decrease the powers of the republics and autonomous provinces and a nationalist motto of "strong Serbia, strong Yugoslavia".[10] During the Anti-Bureaucratic Revolution, Milošević urged Serbians and Montenegrins to "take to the streets" and utilized the slogan "Strong Serbia, Strong Yugoslavia" that drew support from Serbs
Serbs
but alienated Bosnian Muslims, Croats, Kosovo Albanians, Macedonians, and Slovenes.[11] To these groups, Milošević's agenda reminded them of the Serb hegemonic political affairs of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
and Ranković's policies.[11] Milošević and his supporters appealed to nationalist and populist passion by speaking of Serbia's importance to the world and using aggressive and violent political rhetoric, in a Belgrade
Belgrade
speech on 19 November 1988, he spoke of Serbia
Serbia
as facing battles against both internal and external enemies.[11] In Vojvodina, a mob of pro-Milošević demonstrators that included 500 Kosovo Serbs
Serbs
and local Serbs
Serbs
demonstrated at the provincial capital, accusing the leadership in Vojvodina of supporting separatism and for being "traitors".[12] In August 1988, meetings by supporters of the Anti-Bureaucratic Revolution were held in many locations in Serbia
Serbia
and Montenegro, with increasingly violent nature, with calls being heard such as "Give us arms!", "We want weapons!", "Long live Serbia—death to Albanians!", and "Montenegro is Serbia!".[13] In the same month, Milošević began efforts designed to destabilize the governments in Montenegro and Bosnia-Herzegovina to allow him to install his followers in those republics.[13] By 1989, Milošević and his supporters controlled Central Serbia
Serbia
along with the autonomous provinces of Kosovo and Vojvodina, supporters in the leadership of Montenegro, and agents of the Serbian security service were pursuing efforts to destabilize the government in Bosnia & Herzegovina.[14] In 1989, Serbian media began to speak of "the alleged imperilment of the Serbs
Serbs
of Bosnia and Herzegovina", as tensions between Serbs
Serbs
and Bosnian Muslims and Croats increased over Serbs' support for Milošević.[15] Efforts to spread the cult of personality of Milošević into the republic of Macedonia began in 1989 with slogans, graffiti, and songs glorifying Milošević spreading in the republic.[15] Furthermore, Milošević proposed a law to restore land titles held by Serbs
Serbs
in the interwar period that effectively provided a legal basis for large numbers of Serbs
Serbs
to move to Kosovo and Macedonia to regain those lands while displacing the Albanian residents there.[15] Beginning in 1989, Milošević had given support to Croatian Serbs
Serbs
who were vouching for the creation of an autonomous province for Croatia's Serbs
Serbs
that was opposed by Croatia's communist authorities.[16] In the late 1980s Milošević allowed the mobilization of Serb nationalist organizations to go unhindered by actions from the Serbian government, with Chetniks holding demonstrations, and the Serbian government embraced the Serbian Orthodox Church and restored its legitimacy in Serbia.[17] Milošević and the Serbian government supported a tricameral legislature, that would include a Chamber of Citizens to represent the population of Yugoslavia, a system that would give Serbs
Serbs
a majority; a Chamber of Provinces and Republics to represent regional affairs; and a Chamber of Associated Labour.[18] Serbia's specific endorsement of a Chamber of Citizens and a Chamber of Associated Labour faced opposition from the republics of Croatia and Slovenia as they saw the proposals as increasing Serbia's power and federal state control over the economy, which was the opposite of their intention to decrease federal state control over the economy.[18] Slovenia staunchly opposed the Milošević government's plans and promoted its own reforms that would make Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
a decentralized confederation.[19] Croatia and Slovenia denounced the actions by Milošević and began to demand that Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
be made a full multi-party confederal state.[15] Milošević claimed that he opposed a confederal system but also declared that should a confederal system be created, the external borders of Serbia
Serbia
would be an "open question", insinuating that his government would pursue creating an enlarged Serbian federal republic if Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
was decentralized.[20] In 1989, the autonomy of SAP Kosovo and SAP Vojvodina
SAP Vojvodina
were de facto abolished by constitutional reforms that transferred powers away from the provinces to the Serbian government. Milošević rejected the independence of Croatia in 1991, and even after the formation of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
(FRY), it too did not initially recognize Croatia's independence.[21] Plans by Milošević to carve out territory from Croatia to the local Serbs
Serbs
had begun by June 1990, according to the diary of Serbian official Borisav Jović.[22] The Serbian government along with a clique of pro-Milošević members of the Yugoslav army and its general staff, secretly adopted the RAM or "frame" plan that involved the partition of Croatia and Bosnia to give large amounts of territory to the local Serbs
Serbs
that would remain united with Serbia, effectively a Greater Serbia.[23] Armaments and military equipment were placed in strategic positions throughout Croatia and Bosnia for use by the Serbs, and local Serbs
Serbs
were trained as police and paramilitary soldiers in preparation for war.[22] Interviews with government officials involved in political affairs between Serbia
Serbia
and the Republic of Macedonia
Republic of Macedonia
have revealed that Milošević planned to arrest the Republic of Macedonia's political leadership and replace it with politicians loyal to Serbia, when the Republic of Macedonia
Republic of Macedonia
was still part of Yugoslavia.[24] Upon the Republic of Macedonia
Republic of Macedonia
seceding in 1991, the Serbian government declared that Macedonia was an "artificial nation" and Serbia
Serbia
allied with Greece against the Republic of Macedonia, even suggesting a partition of the Republic of Macedonia
Republic of Macedonia
between Serbia
Serbia
and Greece.[24] Milošević demanded the self-determination of Serbs
Serbs
in the Republic of Macedonia and did not recognize the independence of the Republic of Macedonia until 1996.[24] Mottos[edit] See also: List of Serbian mottos

"Samo sloga Srbina spasava" ("Only Unity Saves the Serbs"), read into the "four C's" (as the letter 'S' is seen as a 'C' in the Serbian Cyrillic alphabet) in the Serbian cross
Serbian cross
depicted on the flag and coat of arms of Serbia. "Kosovo je Srbija" ("Kosovo is Serbia"), reaction to Kosovo's disputed independence from Serbia. "Srbija do Tokija" (" Serbia
Serbia
to Tokyo"), in origin a slogan of Serbian soccer fans. "Bog čuva Srbe" ("God saves Serbs"), expression of Serbian faith and trust in God. "Nema krsta bez tri prsta" ("There's no cross without three fingers"), an explanation of the Serbian Three-finger Salute and expressing Serbian Orthodoxy.

Battle of Kosovo
Battle of Kosovo
(1870), painting by Adam Stefanović, a depiction of the Battle of Kosovo
Battle of Kosovo
of 1389.

The Battle of Kosovo
Battle of Kosovo
on Saint Vitus Day
Saint Vitus Day
in 1389 between Serbia
Serbia
and the Ottoman Empire
Ottoman Empire
holds important symbolism in Serbian nationalism.[1] Symbols used to express Serbian ethnic nationalism include the Serbian cross, a number of mottos or slogans and the so-called three-finger salute. See also[edit]

Greater Serbia Serbianisation Serbophilia Rise of nationalism under the Ottoman Empire Albanian nationalism Bosnianism Bosniak nationalism Bulgarian nationalism Croatian nationalism Hungarian nationalism Macedonian nationalism Montenegrin nationalism Slovenian nationalism Yugoslavism Irredentism Separatism Gazimestan speech Breakup of Yugoslavia Kosovo je Srbija National symbols of Serbia

Notes[edit]

^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Motyl 2001, pp. 470. ^ a b Motyl 2001, pp. 470–472. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Motyl 2001, pp. 471. ^ Motyl 2001, pp. 105. ^ Motyl 2001, pp. 472. ^ a b Ramet 2006, 322. ^ Wachtel 2006, pp. 86. ^ Wachtel 2006, pp. 85–87. ^ a b Ramet 2006, pp. 321. ^ a b Ramet 2006, pp. 337. ^ a b c Ramet 2006, pp. 119. ^ Ramet 2006, pp. 350. ^ a b Ramet 2006, pp. 351. ^ Ramet 2006, pp. 354. ^ a b c d Ramet 2006, pp. 355. ^ Ramet 2006, pp. 361. ^ Ramet 2006, pp. 349. ^ a b Ramet 2006, pp. 338. ^ Ramet 2006, pp. 339. ^ Ramet 2006, pp. 359. ^ Sriram, Martin-Ortega & Herman 2010, p. 70. ^ a b LeBor 2004, pp. 140. ^ LeBor 2004, pp. 140–143. ^ a b c Ackermann 2000, p. 72.

References[edit]

Ackermann, Alice (2000). Making Peace Prevail: Preventing Violent Conflict in Macedonia (1st ed.). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0-8156-0602-4.  Pantelić, Bratislav (June 2007). "Designing Identities – Reshaping the Balkans in the First Two Centuries: The Case of Serbia". Journal of Design History. Oxford University Press. 20 (2): 131–144. doi:10.1093/jdh/epm007. Retrieved 1 September 2011.  Pantelić, Bratislav (2011). "Memories of a time forgotten: the myth of the perennial nation". Nations and Nationalism. 17 (2): 443–464. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00469.x.  Motyl, Alexander J. (2001). Encyclopedia of Nationalism, Volume II. Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-227230-7.  Ramet, Sabrina (2006). The Three Yugoslavias: State-Building and Legitimation, 1918–2005. Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-34656-8.  Wachtel, Andrew (2006). Remaining Relevant after Communism: The Role of the Writer in Eastern Europe. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-86766-8. 

Further reading[edit]

Birgit Bock-Luna (2007). The Past in Exile: Serbian Long-distance Nationalism and Identity in the Wake of the Third Balkan War. LIT Verlag Münster. ISBN 978-3-8258-9752-9.  Clark, Christopher. 2012. The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 (2012) Taras Kuzio (17 December 2007). Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives on Nationalism: New Directions in Cross-Cultural and Post-Communist Studies. ibidem-Verlag. pp. 178–. ISBN 978-3-8382-5815-7.  Levine, Louis. 1914. " Pan-Slavism
Pan-Slavism
and European Politics." Political Science Quarterly 29.4 (1914): 664-686. in JSTOR free MacDonald, David (July 2005). "Globalizing the Holocaust: A Jewish 'useable past' in Serbian Nationalism". Portal
Portal
Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies. 2 (2). Retrieved 1 September 2011.  Mracevich, Milovan (16 August 2001), "Serbia's Reluctant Path to Catharsis", Transitions Online, retrieved 1 September 2011  Ford, Peter (20 March 2006), " Serbian nationalism
Serbian nationalism
stirs again", Christian Science Monitor, retrieved 1 September 2011  Jelavich, Charles. 1958. Tsarist Russia and Balkan nationalism: Russian influence in the internal affairs of Bulgaria and Serbia, 1879-1886 (1958). Jelavich, Charles. 1990. South Slav nationalisms--textbooks and Yugoslav Union before 1914 (Ohio State Univ Press, 1990). Jelavich, Charles. 1962. Serbian nationalism
Serbian nationalism
and the question of union with Croatia in the nineteenth century (1962). George W. White (2000). " Serbia
Serbia
and Serbs". Nationalism and Territory: Constructing Group Identity in Southeastern Europe. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-8476-9809-7.  Eric D. Gordy (2010). Culture of Power in Serbia: Nationalism and the Destruction of Alternatives. Penn State Press. ISBN 0-271-04368-7.  Scaife, Robert (26 May 2009), "Serbian Culture of Victimization and Nationalism in a Post-Cold War Europe", Southern Political Science Association annual meeting, New Orleans  Missing or empty title= (help) Eriksen, Jens-Martin; Stjernfelt, Frederik (8 July 2005), "The Memorandum: Roots of Serbian nationalism", Eurozine, retrieved 1 September 2011  Posa, Cristina (1998). "Engineering Hatred: The Roots of Contemporary Serbian Nationalism". Balkanistica (11): 69–77. 

External links[edit]

Media related to Nationalism in Serbia
Serbia
at Wikimedia Commons

v t e

Ethnic nationalism

Africa

Acholi Afrikaner Algerian Berber Canarian Congolese Coptic Egyptian Ethiopian Hutu Igbo Libyan Nigerian Sahrawi Rhodesian Somali Tunisian Ugandan

Asia

Arab Armenian Assamese Assyrian Azerbaijani Balkar and Karachay Baloch Bangladeshi Bengali Bodo Burmese (Burmese Buddhist) Chinese Circassian Dalit East Turkestani Filipino Georgian Gorkha Hindu Hong Kong Indian Indonesian Iranian Iraqi Israeli Japanese Kashmiri Khmer Korean Kurdish Lebanese Lezgian Malay

Early Malaysian Malay

Malaysian Hindu Manchurian Mongolian Marathi Naga Pashtun Pakistani Palestinian Punjabi Ryukyu Saraiki Sikh Sindhi Sinhalese Buddhist South Asian Muslim Sri Lankan Tamil Syrian Taiwanese Tamil Thai Tibetan Tripuri Turkic Turkish Vietnamese Zaza

Europe

Albanian

in Albania in Kosovo in Rep. of Macedonia

Andalusian Armenian Asturian Austrian Azerbaijani Balkar and Karachay Basque Bavarian Belgian Belarusian Bosniak Breton British Bulgarian Canarian Castilian Catalan Celtic Circassian Cornish Corsican Croatian Cypriot Czech Czechoslovak English Estonian Faroese Flemish Finnish French Galician German

in Austria

Georgian Greek Hungarian Icelandic Irish Italian Lezgian Lithuanian Macedonian Moldovan Montenegrin Norwegian Occitan Padanian Polish Prussian Rhenish Romanian Russian Scandinavian Sardinian Scottish Serbian Sicilian Silesian Slavic Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swabian Swiss Turkic Turkish Ukrainian Ulster Valencian Venetian Walloon Welsh

The Americas

American Argentine Brazilian Canadian Confederate Chicano Puerto Rican Native-American Greenlandic Québécois

Oceania

Australian Hawaiian Māori

Other

Racial

Black White

Religious

Christian Islamic

Soviet (spanning two continents) Yugoslav

Note: Forms of nationalism based primarily on ethnic groups are listed above. This does not imply that all nationalists with a given ethnicity subscribe to that form of e

.