Sections 4 and 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

Sections 4 and 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998 are provisions that enable the
Human Rights Act 1998 The Human Rights Act 1998 (c. 42) is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which received royal assent on 9 November 1998, and came into force on 2 October 2000. Its aim was to incorporate into UK law the rights contained in the European Con ...
to take effect in the United Kingdom. Section 4 allows courts to issue a
declaration of incompatibility A declaration of incompatibility in UK constitutional law is a declaration issued by a United Kingdom judge that a statute is incompatible with the European Convention of Human Rights under the Human Rights Act 1998 section 4. This is a central pa ...
where it is impossible to use section 3 to interpret
primary Primary or primaries may refer to: Arts, entertainment, and media Music Groups and labels * Primary (band), from Australia * Primary (musician), hip hop musician and record producer from South Korea * Primary Music, Israeli record label Works * ...
or subordinate legislation so that their provisions are compatible with the articles of the European Convention of Human Rights, which are also part of the Human Rights Act. In these cases, interpretation to comply may conflict with legislative intent. It is considered a measure of last resort. A range of
superior court In common law systems, a superior court is a court of general jurisdiction over civil and criminal legal cases. A superior court is "superior" in relation to a court with limited jurisdiction (see small claims court), which is restricted to civil ...
s can issue a declaration of incompatibility. A declaration of incompatibility is not binding on the parties to the proceedings in which it is made, nor can a declaration invalidate legislation. Section 4 therefore achieves its aim through political rather than legal means, including through Section 10 which allows the government to amend legislation without full legislative approval. A remedial order can only be made after a declaration of incompatibility or a similar finding of a European court with all appeals must have been complete or expressly renounced. Parliament has used Section 10 to make small adjustments where possible to bring legislation into line with Convention rights although entirely new pieces of legislation are sometimes necessary.


Context

Human rights are rights taken to be universal, of considerable importance, and relate to the individual and not collectively; among other things, they can grant freedoms, claims, immunities and powers. The European Convention on Human Rights was drawn up in the wake of the Second World War to uphold such rights. The United Kingdom ratified the European Convention on Human Rights in 1951, and accepted the right of individual petition to the European Court of Human Rights,
Strasbourg Strasbourg (, , ; german: Straßburg ; gsw, label=Bas Rhin Alsatian, Strossburi , gsw, label=Haut Rhin Alsatian, Strossburig ) is the prefecture and largest city of the Grand Est region of eastern France and the official seat of the Eu ...
, in 1966. The
Human Rights Act 1998 The Human Rights Act 1998 (c. 42) is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which received royal assent on 9 November 1998, and came into force on 2 October 2000. Its aim was to incorporate into UK law the rights contained in the European Con ...
made most Convention rights directly enforceable in a British court for the first time. Excluded are Articles 1 and 13, which the government argued were fulfilled by the Act itself, and therefore were not relevant to rights enforced under it. The Human Rights Act has had a considerable effect on British law, and remains an Act of "fundamental constitutional importance".


Provisions

Section 4 allows a court to make a "declaration of incompatibility" if it is "satisfied that the provision is incompatible with a Convention right". Section 3 requires that courts interpret legislation as compatible with Convention rights wherever possible. Lord Steyn has described a declaration of incompatibility was a "measure of last resort". However, ''In re S'' established that there may be cases where interpretation can go too far; that the court can assume an administrative power it would not ordinarily have, with practical consequences that it is not best placed to consider: "a meaning which departs substantially from a fundamental feature of an Act of Parliament is likely to have crossed the boundary between interpretation and amendment." The "thrust" of a statute is important; going against the "thrust" requires legislative power that the courts do not have. As in ''R (Anderson) v Home Secretary'', a declaration of incompatibility under section 4 of the Act may be the only appropriate remedy. The United Kingdom recognises parliamentary sovereignty. The legislature is above the courts, and the courts cannot therefore declare legislation invalid. Section 4 reflects this, and states that courts must continue to apply legislation, even if incompatible with Convention rights. Section 4(6)(a) notes that a declaration of incompatibility "does not affect the validity, continuing operation or enforcement of the provision in respect of which it is given", which is similar to Section 3(2)(b). ''R v Lyons'' confirmed that evidence could be used, even where incompatible with Convention rights, if it was expressly allowed under statute. A declaration of incompatibility is merely a flag that alerts Parliament that people's human rights are being infringed. Accordingly, it has no more legal effect than the fact of incompatible. Section 4(4) allows the court to issue a declaration of incompatibility if altering secondary legislation is impossible because it would necessarily conflict with a statute. Following amendment by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, the Armed Forces Act 2006 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005, courts which are entitled to issue a declaration of incompatibility are the
Supreme Court A supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts in most legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, apex court, and high (or final) court of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of ...
, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, the Courts Martial Appeal Court, the High Court and
Court of Appeal A court of appeals, also called a court of appeal, appellate court, appeal court, court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In much of t ...
( England and Wales and Northern Ireland), and the High Court of Justiciary ( Scotland) and
Court of Protection The Court of Protection in English law is a superior court of record created under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. It has jurisdiction over the property, financial affairs and personal welfare of people who lack mental capacity to make decision ...
in particular roles.


Application and section 10

In ''A v Home Secretary'', the detention of foreign nationals under the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 was ruled to be in contravention of Article 14 of the convention. They could be detained in circumstances British nationals could not, discriminating on the grounds of nationality. This discrimination was explicit and could not be interpreted to follow the Convention using Section 3. Accordingly, a declaration of incompatibility was made. In ''Bellinger v Bellinger'', the court followed a European case, ''Goodwin v United Kingdom'', in deciding that the failure to allow persons who had undergone gender reassignment to marry under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 was incompatible with
Article 8 Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one's "privacy, private and family life, his home and his privacy of correspondence, correspondence", subject to certain restrictions that are "in accordance with l ...
of the convention. Altering this would involve a "fundamental change in the traditional concept of marriage", which was the domain of the legislature and not the courts; accordingly, a declaration of incompatibility was issued. In ''R (Anderson) v Home Secretary'', the court found that assigning the decision over the tariff of a mandatory life sentence to the Home Secretary was in breach of Article 6 of the Convention – however, he was explicitly given it under the statute, and it could not be removed merely by interpretation. Under Section 4(6)(b), a declaration of incompatibility is not even "binding on the parties to the proceedings in which it is made". Since a declaration cannot invalidate or disapply legislation, it achieves its aim through political rather than legal means – it is for Parliament to correct the law, or continue to be in contravention of the convention. Section 10 provides one route for correction: "If a Minister of the Crown considers that there are compelling reasons for proceeding under this section, he may by order make such amendments to the legislation as he considers necessary to remove the incompatibility" (section 10(2)). It is designed to be a quick method; although it must be put before parliament, a remedial order does not require full legislative approval. This summary process was controversial, as it ignored the possibility for debate. However, the time required for this could not be provided in reality. In any case, approval is still required before the order comes into force, or, in the case of urgent legislation, within 120 days of it coming into force. A remedial order can only be made after a declaration of incompatibility or a similar finding of a European court, which will have been justified and discussed before being made. Under Section 10(1), all appeals must have been complete or expressly renounced. Parliament has used Section 10 to make small adjustments where possible to bring legislation into line with Convention rights. In the ''Anderson'' and ''Bellinger'' cases, entirely new pieces of legislation were drafted and passed in the normal process, since they changed the law more considerably than the Section 10 process would allow.


References


Citations

''R (Anderson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department''
003 003, O03, 0O3, OO3 may refer to: *003, fictional British 00 Agent *003, former emergency telephone number for the Norwegian ambulance service (until 1986) *1990 OO3, the asteroid 6131 Towen * OO3 gauge model railway *''O03 (O2)'' and other related ...
1 A.C. 837. Available a
the UK Parliament Web site
Accessed 11 January 2012.
''Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza''
004 004, 0O4, O04, OO4 may refer to: * 004, fictional British 00 Agent * 0O4, Corning Municipal Airport (California) * O04, the Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation * Abdul Haq Wasiq, Guantanamo detainee 004 * Junkers Jumo 004 turbojet engine * Lauda ...
UKHL 30. Available a
the UK Parliament Web site
Accessed 11 January 2012.
''In re S (Minors) (Care Order: Implementation of Care Plan)''
002 002, 0O2, O02, OO2, or 002 may refer to: Fiction *002, fictional British 00 Agent *''002 Operazione Luna'', *1965 Italian film *Zero Two, a ''Darling in the Franxx'' character Airports *0O2, Baker Airport *O02, Nervino Airport Astronomy *1996 ...
UKHL 10. Available a
the UK Parliament Web site
Accessed 11 January 2012.
''Bellinger v Bellinger''
003 003, O03, 0O3, OO3 may refer to: *003, fictional British 00 Agent *003, former emergency telephone number for the Norwegian ambulance service (until 1986) *1990 OO3, the asteroid 6131 Towen * OO3 gauge model railway *''O03 (O2)'' and other related ...
UKHL 21. Available a
the UK Parliament Web site
Accessed 12 January 2012.
''A (and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department''
004 004, 0O4, O04, OO4 may refer to: * 004, fictional British 00 Agent * 0O4, Corning Municipal Airport (California) * O04, the Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation * Abdul Haq Wasiq, Guantanamo detainee 004 * Junkers Jumo 004 turbojet engine * Lauda ...
UKHL 56. Available a
the UK Parliament Web site
Accessed 12 January 2012.
''R v Lyons (and others)''
002 002, 0O2, O02, OO2, or 002 may refer to: Fiction *002, fictional British 00 Agent *''002 Operazione Luna'', *1965 Italian film *Zero Two, a ''Darling in the Franxx'' character Airports *0O2, Baker Airport *O02, Nervino Airport Astronomy *1996 ...
UKHL 44. Available a
the UK Parliament Web site
Accessed 12 January 2012.
Lester, Beattie in Jowell, Oliver (eds. ) (2007). P. 59. Bradley, Ewing (2007). P. 432. Bradley, Ewing (2007). Pp. 433–434. Hoffman, Rowe (2006). P. 10. Hoffman, Rowe (2006). P. 42. Hoffman, Rowe (2006). P. 60. Hoffman, Rowe (2006). P. 64. Hoffman, Rowe (2006). P. 65. Hoffman, Rowe (2006). Pp. 65–66. Hoffman, Rowe (2006). P. 66.


Bibliography

* * * {{Portal, Law, United Kingdom United Kingdom Acts of Parliament 1998 Constitutional laws of the United Kingdom Human rights in the United Kingdom Human rights legislation