The Info List - Scotism

--- Advertisement ---

Philosophy Portal Catholicism Portal

v t e

Part of a series on

Catholic philosophy

Aquinas, Scotus, and Ockham


Augustinianism Molinism Occamism Salamanca Scholasticism


Scotism Thomism


Natural law Personalism Social teaching Virtue ethics

Ancient philosophers

Ambrose Augustine of Hippo Jerome Paul the Apostle

Medieval philosophers

Peter Abelard Alexander of Hales Thomas Aquinas Benedict of Nursia Francis of Mayrone Giles of Rome Pope Gregory I Henry of Ghent Peter Lombard Albertus Magnus Duns Scotus William of Ockham

Renaissance philosophers

Erasmus Luis de Molina Thomas More Francisco de Vitoria

Modern philosophers

G. E. M. Anscombe Pope John Paul II Bernard Lonergan Alasdair MacIntyre Jacques Maritain Blaise Pascal Edith Stein Charles Taylor

Catholicism portal Philosophy portal

v t e

Antonio De Fantis, Opus Oxoniense

is the name given to the philosophical and theological system or school named after Blessed John Duns Scotus. The word comes from the name of its originator, whose Opus Oxoniense was one of the most important documents in medieval philosophy and Roman Catholic theology, defining what would later be declared the Dogma of the Immaculate conception
Immaculate conception
by Pope Pius IX
Pope Pius IX
in his constitution Ineffabilis Deus on 8 December 1854.[1][2]


1 Development 2 Scotism
and doctrinal conflicts within the Catholic Church 3 Scotism
and the Jesuit tradition 4 The influence of Scotism
on philosophy and theology 5 Emergence of the Scotist School 6 Scotists

6.1 Fifteenth and sixteenth century 6.2 Seventeenth and eighteenth century 6.3 Nineteenth century 6.4 Twentieth century

7 Notes 8 References 9 External links

Development[edit] Scotism
developed out of the Old Franciscan School, which dominated theology during the Middle Ages. This school of thought initially followed Augustinism
which dominated theology at the time. Scotus found the ground already cleared for the conflict with the followers of Aquinas. He made very free use of Aristotelianism, but in its employment exercised sharp criticism, and in important points adhered to the teaching of the Older Franciscan School – especially with regard to the plurality of forms or of souls, the spiritual matter of the angels and of souls, etc., wherein he energetically combatted Aquinas. Scotism, or what is known as the Later Franciscan School, is thus only a continuation or further development of the older school, with a much wider, although not exclusive acceptance of Peripatetic ideas. The difference between Thomism
and Scotism
could be expressed by saying that, while both derive from Arabic Neoplatonized Aristotelianism, Thomism
is closer to the orthodox Aristotelianism
of Maimonides, Averroes
and Avicenna, while Scotism
reflects the Platonizing tendency going back through Avicebron, the Brethren of Purity, the Liber de Causis
Liber de Causis
and Proclus to Plotinus. Concerning the relation of these schools to each other, or the relation of Scotus to Alexander of Hales
Alexander of Hales
and St. Bonaventure, consult the work of the Flemish Recollect, Mathias Hauzeur. It is notable that, while Thomism
became the official philosophy of the Church, Scotist influence prevailed on a number of important points, not least the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception. Scotism
and doctrinal conflicts within the Catholic Church[edit] Nominalism is older than Scotus, but its revival in Occamism
may be traced to the one-sided exaggeration of some propositions of Scotus. Scotist Formalism is the direct opposite of Nominalism, and the Scotists were at one with the Thomists in combatting the latter; Occam himself was a bitter opponent of Scotus. The Council of Trent
Council of Trent
defined as dogma a series of doctrines especially emphasized by the Scotists (e.g. freedom of the will, free co-operation with grace, etc..). In other points the canons were intentionally so framed that they do not affect Scotism
(e.g. that the first man was constitutus in holiness and justice). This was also done at the Vatican Council. In the Thomistic–Molinistic controversy concerning the foreknowledge of God, predestination, the relation of grace to free will, the Scotists took little part. They either supported one of the parties, or took up a middle position, rejecting both the predetermination of the Thomists and the scientia media of the Molinists. God recognizes the free future acts in His essence, and provides a free decree of His will, which does not predetermine our free will, but only accompanies it. Scotism
and the Jesuit tradition[edit] Jesuit philosophers and theologians adopted a series of the Scotist propositions. Later authorities reject in part many of these propositions and another series of propositions was misunderstood even by Catholic theologians, and then in this false sense rightly rejected – e.g. the doctrine of the univocatio entis, of the acceptation of the merits of Christ and man, etc. Numerous other propositions have been accepted or at least favourably treated by a large number of Catholic scholars and amongst these are many propositions from psychology: e.g. that the powers of the soul are not merely accidents even natural and necessary of the soul, that they are not really distinct from the substance of the soul or from one another etc. They also took from Scotism
many propositions concerning the doctrine of the angels. The influence of Scotism
on philosophy and theology[edit] Scotism
exercised an influence on the development of philosophy and theology; its importance is not, as is often asserted, purely negative – i.e. it does not consist only in the fact that it exercised a criticism on Thomas Aquinas
Thomas Aquinas
and the Thomistic school. A comparison of the Scotist teaching with that of Aquinas has been often attempted – for example, in the abovementioned work of Hauzeur at the end of the first volume; by Sarnano (Costanzo Torri, Conciliatio omnium controversiarum etc. (1589– ). In many cases, the differences are mostly in the terminology and a reconciliation is possible if one emphasize certain parts of Scotus or Aquinas and passes over or tones down others. However, some contradictions remain on a number of points. Generally speaking, Scotism
found its supporters within the Franciscan Order; certainly, opposition to the Dominicans, i.e. to Aquinas, made many members of the order disciples of Scotus. However, this does not mean that the foundation and development of Scotism
is to be regarded as a product of the rivalry between the two orders. Even Aquinas at first found a few opponents in his order – not all his fellow-Dominicans followed him in every particular (e.g. Durandus of St. Pourçain). The Scotist doctrines were also supported by many Minorites. Furthermore, Scotism
found not a few supporters among secular professors and in other religious orders (e.g. the Augustinians, Servites, etc.), especially in England, Ireland, and Spain. Of the Minorites
who supported Scotist doctrine, the Conventuals
seem to have adhered most faithfully to Scotus, particularly at the University of Padua, where many highly esteemed teachers lectured. Emergence of the Scotist School[edit] It is only at the end of the 15th or the beginning of the sixteenth century that a special Scotist School can be spoken of. The works of the master were then collected, brought out in many editions and commentated, etc. And from 1501 we also find numerous regulations of general chapters recommending or directly prescribing Scotism
as the teaching of the order. Scotism
appears to have attained its greatest popularity at the beginning of the seventeenth century; during the sixteenth and the seventeenth centuries we even find special Scotist chairs, e.g. at Paris, Rome, Coimbra, Salamanca, Alcalá, Padua, and Pavia. In the eighteenth century it had still an important following, but in the 19th it suffered a great decline. One of the reasons for this was the repeated suppressions of the order in almost every country, while the recommendation of the teaching of St. Thomas by several popes could not be favourable to Scotism. It has even been asserted that it was merely tolerated by the Catholic Church; but this statement is a priori improbable in regard to a school of which not a single proposition has been censured, and to which so many highly venerated men (bishops, cardinals, popes, and saints) have belonged; and it is still less probable in view of the approval of the various general statutes (repeated so often down to the present day), in which Scotism
is at least recommended. In their Decrees Leo XIII
and Pius X
Pius X
have recommended not alone St. Thomas, but also Scholasticism
in general, and this includes also the Scotist School. Scotists[edit] Most Scotists are both philosophers and theologians. Notable Scotists of the fourteenth century included Antonius Andrea and Francis of Mayrone(c. 1280-1328) author of a Tractatus de transcendentibus.Francis Mayron, who introduced the actus sorbonicus into the University of Paris. Fifteenth and sixteenth century[edit] Scotists of the fifteenth century included two popes, Alexander V and Sixtus IV, Elector Frederick III of Saxony
and Angelus of Chivasso. The latter's work on Scotist theology was so notorious that it was publicly burned by Martin Luther. Notable Scotists of the sixteenth century included Paul Scriptoris, noted professor at the University of Tübingen, and the Archbishop of Athens Antonio Trombetta. Seventeenth and eighteenth century[edit] Of very many names we may mention:

Angelo Vulpes (Volpe) (d. 1647) wrote Summa and Commen. theologiae Scoti in twelve folio volumes. Luke Wadding
Luke Wadding
(d. 1657), a well-known annalist, edited with other Irishmen in the College of S. Isidore at Rome the complete works of Scotus (12 vols., Lyons, 1639). Lambertus Lambrecht (about 1696), named the Viennese Scotus. Cardinal Lorenzo Brancati di Lauria[3] (d. 1693), held in high favour by several popes. Francisco Macedo (d. 1681), a Portuguese, professor at Padua is said to have composed over one hundred writings and was renowned for his public disputations. Claude Frassen
Claude Frassen
(d. 1711) was for thirty years a celebrated professor at the Sorbonne and wrote "Scotus academicus seu universa theo Scoti". Bartholomaeus Durandus (Bartélemy Durand)[4] (d. 1720) wrote the great Clypeus Scotisticae Theologiae.

Nineteenth century[edit] In the nineteenth century, although Scotism
was retained in the schools of the Franciscan Order
Franciscan Order
in accordance with the statutes, there were few works in the Scotist tradition, in any case no celebrated ones. Twentieth century[edit] Though the use of the term Scotism
has become a bit antiquated, several contemporary theologians, especially from among the Franciscan Orders, like Kenan Osborne OFM and Daniel Horan
Daniel Horan
OFM, can be seen as in the Scotist tradition. Several recent projects such as the Scotus Project of CUA, the International Scotistic Commission in Rome and the Commission of the Franciscan Intellectual Tradition of the English Speaking Conference of the OFM have sought to increase awareness of Duns Scotus
Duns Scotus
and Scotism
on contemporary theology. Notes[edit]

^ Ordinatio III, d.3, q.1 ^ http://www.ewtn.com/faith/teachings/marye1.htm ^ The Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church – Biographical Dictionary – Consistory of September 1, 1681 ^ Bartholomaeus Durandus, Online bibliography of Franciscan Authors.


 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). " Scotism
and Scotists". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton. 

External links[edit]

International Scotistic Commission: Scotism Electronic Resources for M