Salem witchcraft trial (1878)

The Salem witchcraft trial of 1878, also known as the Ipswich witchcraft trial and the second Salem witch trial, was an American civil case held in May 1878 in Salem, Massachusetts, in which Lucretia L. S. Brown, an adherent of the Christian Science religion, accused fellow Christian Scientist Daniel H. Spofford of attempting to harm her through his " mesmeric" mental powers. By 1918, it was considered the last witchcraft trial held in the United States. The case garnered significant attention for its startling claims and the fact that it took place in Salem, the scene of the 1692 Salem witch trials. The judge dismissed the case.

Background

Daniel Spofford was one of the earliest adherents of Mary Baker Eddy (then known as Mary Baker Glover). Spofford was born in New Hampshire and grew up as a menial laborer and watchmaker's apprentice in eastern Massachusetts. At 19, he enlisted in the United States Army and served in the American Civil War. After the war, he worked in a shoemaker's shop in Lynn, Massachusetts, and around 1867 obtained copies of some of Glover's early writings on Christian Science. Spofford left Lynn to travel out west, but returned to Lynn in 1870 and met Glover. Spofford took one of Glover's classes in metaphysical healing in the early spring of 1875, and graduated in April.

Immediately thereafter, Spofford organized a group of Christian Science students to provide financial support to Glover (so that she might continue to teach them the tenets of her religious beliefs) and to rent a meeting space for them. He also set up several offices around the area to practice Christian Science healing, and began calling himself "Dr. Daniel Spofford". When Glover had difficulty finding a publisher for her book, '' Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures'', Spofford acted as publisher, while fellow students George Barry and Elizabeth Newhall financed the publication. Spofford even distributed handbills alongside Glover to promote the book. He also introduced Glover to her future husband, Asa Gilbert Eddy. Glover and Eddy soon married, and Spofford was asked to help arrange the ceremony. The now-Mrs. Eddy continued to ask Spofford for assistance in handling the mental drain of her many students and the preparations for the second edition of her book.

In the spring of 1877, while Eddy was vacationing, she and Spofford disagreed over the publication terms of the second edition of ''Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures''. On January 19, 1878, Spofford was expelled from the Association of Christian Scientists on grounds of "immorality". Eddy then sued Spofford for unpaid tuition, but lost the suit. Eddy and Spofford broke completely shortly thereafter. Modern commentators claim that Spofford felt shut out by Asa Eddy.

Role of Christian Science teaching in the case

In her writings, Mary Baker Eddy developed the concept of "malicious animal magnetism" (MAM), seemingly a form of hypnosis or possibly mental control or mental energy which could harm others. Chapter V of the first edition of ''Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures'' was titled "Animal Magnetism Exposed", and explained how the mind can cure itself but also harm others ("mind crime"). Eddy apparently believed that such "mind crimes" could be stopped by having people in close physical proximity to her so she could "intercept" these mental emanations.

MAM proved to be a lifelong concern of Eddy's after 1878. She rushed a truncated, second edition of ''Science and Health'' into print in 1878 so that her thinking on the issue could become public as soon as possible, and her lectures paid increasing attention to the issue. In 1881, a more complete, two-volume edition of ''Science and Health'' appeared, with the chapter on MAM greatly expanded and retitled "Demonology". (Later editions would remove this term from ''Science and Health''.)

Lawsuit

Lucretia Brown was a 50-year-old spinster who lived in Ipswich, Massachusetts, a town about northeast of Salem, Massachusetts. An injury to her spine during childhood left her disabled, but she said Christian Science had healed her. She suffered a relapse in 1877 and again in 1878, and accused Spofford of having interfered with her health through "mesmerism". Her lawsuit stated:

At least one witness claims that Eddy's attorney drew up the complaint for Brown. Eddy strenuously denied this. Some modern scholars have concluded that Brown acted without Eddy's influence, but others have asserted that Eddy was behind the suit.

The trial at the Supreme Judicial Court in Salem opened on May 14, 1878. Judge Horace Gray presided. Mary Baker Eddy and 21 other witnesses traveled to Salem to testify against Spofford. Judge Gray ordered Spofford to appear on May 17. The case garnered widespread attention from the media, with articles appearing in the ''Boston Globe'', ''Newburyport Herald'', and ''Salem Observer''.

On May 17, Amos Noyes, Spofford's attorney (appearing on behalf of his client who did not attend the trial), filed a demurrer with the court, arguing that there was no question in equity and that the court had no jurisdiction in the case.

Brown's attorney, Edward Arens, claimed that mesmerism was an acknowledged fact and challenged the demurrer. Judge Gray dismissed the case, noting the claim was vague and the complaint "framed without a knowledge of the law of equity." The court ruled it was not clear how it could prevent such mental control, even if it were to imprison Spofford. Brown appealed the court's ruling, but the appeal was dismissed in November 1878.

One critical observer called the trial "one of the most bizarre court-room sessions ever held in the United States." Eddy was strongly criticized in the press over the case.

See also

* Salem witch trials

Footnotes

Bibliography

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

{{Witch Trials in America
Witch trials in North America
Christian Science in Massachusetts
History of Salem, Massachusetts
1878 in Massachusetts
May 1878 events
American witchcraft
History of women in Massachusetts
Animal magnetism
Mary Baker Eddy