The Info List - Religious Tolerance

--- Advertisement ---

is the acceptance of an action, object, or person which one dislikes or disagrees with, where one is in a position to disallow it but chooses not to. It has also been defined as "to bear or endure" or "to nourish, sustain or preserve" or as "a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward those whose opinions, beliefs, practices, racial or ethnic origins, etc., differ from one's own; freedom from bigotry" too. Toleration
may signify "no more than forbearance and the permission given by the adherents of a dominant religion for other religions to exist, even though the latter are looked on with disapproval as inferior, mistaken, or harmful."[1] There is only one verb to tolerate and one adjective tolerant, but the two nouns tolerance and toleration have evolved slightly different meanings. Tolerance is a state of mind that implies non-judgmental acceptance of different lifestyles or beliefs,[2] whereas toleration indicates the act of putting up with something that one disapproves of.[3] Historically, most incidents and writings pertaining to toleration involve the status of minority and dissenting viewpoints in relation to a dominant state religion.[4] In the twentieth century and after, analysis of the doctrine of toleration has been expanded to include political and ethnic groups, LGBT
individuals and other minorities, and human rights embodies the principle of legally enforced toleration.


1 Etymology 2 In antiquity 3 Biblical sources 4 In the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, and the Reformation

4.1 Tolerance of the Jews 4.2 Vladimiri 4.3 Erasmus 4.4 More 4.5 Reformation 4.6 Castellio 4.7 Bodin 4.8 Montaigne 4.9 Edict of Torda 4.10 Maximilian II 4.11 The Warsaw Confederation, 1573 4.12 Edict of Nantes

5 In the Enlightenment

5.1 Milton 5.2 Rudolph II 5.3 In the American colonies 5.4 Spinoza 5.5 Locke 5.6 Bayle 5.7 Act of Toleration 5.8 Voltaire 5.9 Lessing 5.10 Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen 5.11 The First Amendment to the United States Constitution

6 In the nineteenth century

6.1 Roman Catholic Relief Act 6.2 Mill 6.3 Renan

7 In the twentieth century 8 In other religions

8.1 Hindu
religion 8.2 Islam 8.3 Buddhism

9 Tolerance and digital technologies 10 Modern analyses and critiques

10.1 Modern definition 10.2 Homosexuality 10.3 Tolerating the intolerant 10.4 Other criticisms and issues

11 See also 12 Sources 13 References 14 Further reading 15 External links

Etymology[edit] The word tolerance was first used in the 15th century.[5] The word is derived from endurance and fortitude, used in the 14th century. According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, the word was first used to describe having permission from authorities in the 1530s.[6] In antiquity[edit]

Minerva as a symbol of enlightened wisdom protects the believers of all religions (Daniel Chodowiecki, 1791)

Religious toleration has been described as a "remarkable feature" of the Achaemenid Empire
Achaemenid Empire
of Persia.[7] As reported in the Old Testament, king Cyrus the Great
Cyrus the Great
was believed to have released the Jews
from captivity in 539–530 BCE, and permitted their return to their homeland.[8] Cyrus the Great
Cyrus the Great
assisted in the restoration of the sacred places of various cities.[7] The Hellenistic city of Alexandria, founded 331 BCE, contained a large Jewish community which lived in peace with equivalently sized Greek and Egyptian populations. According to Michael Walzer, the city provided "a useful example of what we might think of as the imperial version of multiculturalism."[9] The Roman Empire
Roman Empire
encouraged conquered peoples to continue worshipping their own gods. "An important part of Roman propaganda was its invitation to the gods of conquered territories to enjoy the benefits of worship within the imperium."[10] Christians were singled out for persecution because of their own rejection of Roman pantheism and refusal to honor the emperor as a god.[11] In 311 CE, Roman Emperor Galerius
issued a general edict of toleration of Christianity, in his own name and in those of Licinius
and Constantine I
Constantine I
(who converted to Christianity
the following year).[12] Biblical sources[edit] In the Old Testament, the books of Exodus, Leviticus
and Deuteronomy make similar statements about the treatment of strangers. For example, Exodus 22:21 says: "Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt".These texts are frequently used in sermons to plead for compassion and tolerance of those who are different from us and less powerful.[13] Julia Kristeva elucidated a philosophy of political and religious toleration based on all of our mutual identities as strangers.[14] The New Testament Parable of the Tares, which speaks of the difficulty of distinguishing wheat from weeds before harvest time, has also been invoked in support of religious toleration. In his "Letter to Bishop Roger of Chalons", Bishop Wazo of Liege
Wazo of Liege
(c. 985–1048 AD) relied on the parable[15] to argue that "the church should let dissent grow with orthodoxy until the Lord comes to separate and judge them".[16] Roger Williams, a Baptist theologian and founder of Rhode Island, used this parable to support government toleration of all of the "weeds" (heretics) in the world, because civil persecution often inadvertently hurts the "wheat" (believers) too. Instead, Williams believed it was God's duty to judge in the end, not man's. This parable lent further support to Williams' Biblical philosophy of a wall of separation between church and state as described in his 1644 book, The Bloody Tenent of Persecution.[17] In the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, and the Reformation[edit] In the Middle Ages, there were instances of toleration of particular groups. The Latin concept tolerantia was a "highly-developed political and judicial concept in mediaeval scholastic theology and canon law."[18] Tolerantia was used to "denote the self-restraint of a civil power in the face of" outsiders, like infidels, Muslims or Jews, but also in the face of social groups like prostitutes and lepers.[18] Heretics such as the Cathari, Waldensians, Jan Hus, and his followers, the Hussites, were persecuted.[19][20] Later theologians belonging or reacting to the Protestant Reformation
Protestant Reformation
began discussion of the circumstances under which dissenting religious thought should be permitted. Toleration
"as a government-sanctioned practice" in Christian countries, "the sense on which most discussion of the phenomenon relies—is not attested before the sixteenth century".[21] Tolerance of the Jews[edit] In Poland in 1264, the Statute of Kalisz
Statute of Kalisz
was issued, guaranteeing freedom of religion for the Jews
in the country. In 1348, Pope Clement VI
Pope Clement VI
(1291–1352) issued a bull pleading with Catholics not to murder Jews, whom they blamed for the Black Death. He noted that Jews
died of the plague like anyone else, and that the disease also flourished in areas where there were no Jews. Christians who blamed and killed Jews
had been "seduced by that liar, the Devil". He took Jews
under his personal protection at Avignon, but his calls for other clergy to do so failed to be heeded.[22] Johann Reuchlin
Johann Reuchlin
(1455–1522) was a German humanist and a scholar of Greek and Hebrew who opposed efforts by Johannes Pfefferkorn, backed by the Dominicans of Cologne, to confiscate all religious texts from the Jews
as a first step towards their forcible conversion to the Catholic religion.[23] Despite occasional spontaneous episodes of pogroms and killings, as during the Black Death, Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
was a relatively tolerant home for the Jews
in the medieval period. In 1264, the Statute of Kalisz
Statute of Kalisz
guaranteed safety, personal liberties, freedom of religion, trade, and travel to Jews. By the mid-16th century, the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
was home to 80% of the world's Jewish population. Jewish worship was officially recognized, with a Chief Rabbi originally appointed by the monarch. Jewish property ownership was also protected for much of the period, and Jews
entered into business partnerships with members of the nobility.[24] Vladimiri[edit] Paulus Vladimiri
Paulus Vladimiri
(ca. 1370–1435) was a Polish scholar and rector who at the Council of Constance
Council of Constance
in 1414, presented a thesis, Tractatus de potestate papae et imperatoris respectu infidelium (Treatise on the Power of the Pope and the Emperor Respecting Infidels). In it he argued that pagan and Christian nations could coexist in peace and criticized the Teutonic Order
Teutonic Order
for its wars of conquest of native non-Christian peoples in Prussia and Lithuania. Vladimiri strongly supported the idea of conciliarism and pioneered the notion of peaceful coexistence among nations—a forerunner of modern theories of human rights. Throughout his political, diplomatic and university career, he expressed the view that a world guided by the principles of peace and mutual respect among nations was possible and that pagan nations had a right to peace and to possession of their own lands. Erasmus[edit] Desiderius Erasmus
Desiderius Erasmus
Roterodamus (1466–1536), was a Dutch Renaissance humanist and Catholic whose works laid a foundation for religious toleration. For example, in De libero arbitrio, opposing certain views of Martin Luther, Erasmus noted that religious disputants should be temperate in their language, "because in this way the truth, which is often lost amidst too much wrangling may be more surely perceived." Gary Remer writes, "Like Cicero, Erasmus concludes that truth is furthered by a more harmonious relationship between interlocutors."[25] Although Erasmus did not oppose the punishment of heretics, in individual cases he generally argued for moderation and against the death penalty. He wrote, "It is better to cure a sick man than to kill him."[26] More[edit] Saint Thomas More (1478–1535), Catholic Lord Chancellor of King Henry VIII and author, described a world of almost complete religious toleration in Utopia (1516), in which the Utopians "can hold various religious beliefs without persecution from the authorities."[27] However, More's work is subject to various interpretations, and it is not clear that he felt that earthly society should be conducted the same way as in Utopia. Thus, in his three years as Lord Chancellor, More actively approved of the persecution of those who sought to undermine the Catholic faith in England.[28] Reformation[edit] At the Diet of Worms
Diet of Worms
(1521), Martin Luther
Martin Luther
refused to recant his beliefs citing freedom of conscience as his justification.[29] According to Historian Hermann August Winkler, the individual's freedom of conscience became the hallmark of Protestantism.[30] Luther was convinced that faith in Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ
was the free gift of the Holy Spirit and could therefore not be forced on a person. Heresies could not be met with force, but with preaching the gospel revealed in the Bible. Luther: "Heretics should not be overcome with fire, but with written sermons." In Luther's view, the worldly authorities were entitled to expel heretics. Only if they undermine the public order, should they be executed.[31] Later proponents of tolerance such as Sebastian Franck
Sebastian Franck
and Sebastian Castellio
Sebastian Castellio
cited Luther's position. He had overcome, at least for the Protestant territories and countries, the violent medieval criminal procedures of dealing with heretics. But Luther remained rooted in the Middle Ages
Middle Ages
insofar as he considered the Anabaptists' refusal to take oaths, do military service, and the rejection of private property by some Anabaptist groups to be a political threat to the public order which would inevitably lead to anarchy and chaos.[32] So Anabaptists
were persecuted not only in Catholic but also in Lutheran and Reformed territories. However, a number of Protestant theologians such as John Calvin, Martin Bucer, Wolfgang Capito, and Johannes Brenz
Johannes Brenz
as well as Landgrave Philip of Hesse opposed the execution of Anabaptists.[33] Ulrich Zwingli demanded the expulsion of persons who did not accept the Reformed beliefs, in some cases the execution of Anabaptist leaders. The young Michael Servetus
Michael Servetus
also defended tolerance since 1531, in his letters to Johannes Oecolampadius, but during those years some Protestant theologians such as Bucer and Capito publicly expressed they thought he should be persecuted.[34] The trial against Servetus, an Antitrinitarian, in Geneva was not a case of church discipline but a criminal procedure based on the legal code of the Holy Roman Empire. Denying the Trinity doctrine was long considered to be the same as atheism in all churches. The Anabaptists
made a considerable contribution to the development of tolerance in the early-modern era by incessantly demanding freedom of conscience and standing up for it with their patient suffering.[35] Castellio[edit] Sebastian Castellio
Sebastian Castellio
(1515–1563) was a French Protestant theologian who in 1554 published under a pseudonym the pamphlet Whether heretics should be persecuted (De haereticis, an sint persequendi) criticizing John Calvin's execution of Michael Servetus: "When Servetus fought with reasons and writings, he should have been repulsed by reasons and writings." Castellio concluded: "We can live together peacefully only when we control our intolerance. Even though there will always be differences of opinion from time to time, we can at any rate come to general understandings, can love one another, and can enter the bonds of peace, pending the day when we shall attain unity of faith."[36] Castellio is remembered for the often quoted statement, "To kill a man is not to protect a doctrine, but it is to kill a man.[37] Bodin[edit] Jean Bodin
Jean Bodin
(1530–1596) was a French Catholic jurist and political philosopher. His Latin work Colloquium heptaplomeres de rerum sublimium arcanis abditis ("The Colloqium of the Seven") portrays a conversation about the nature of truth between seven cultivated men from diverse religious or philosophical backgrounds: a natural philosopher, a Calvinist, a Muslim, a Roman Catholic, a Lutheran, a Jew, and a skeptic. All agree to live in mutual respect and tolerance. Montaigne[edit] Michel de Montaigne
Michel de Montaigne
(1533–1592), French Catholic essayist and statesman, moderated between the Catholic and Protestant sides in the Wars of Religion. Montaigne's theory of skepticism led to the conclusion that we cannot precipitously decide the error of others' views. Montaigne wrote in his famous "Essais": "It is putting a very high value on one's conjectures, to have a man roasted alive because of them...To kill people, there must be sharp and brilliant clarity."[38] Edict of Torda[edit] In 1568, King John II Sigismund
John II Sigismund
of Hungary, encouraged by his Unitarian Minister Francis David (Dávid Ferenc), issued the Edict of Torda decreeing religious toleration. Maximilian II[edit] In 1571, Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian II granted religious toleration to the nobles of Lower Austria, their families and workers.[39] The Warsaw Confederation, 1573[edit]

Original act of the Warsaw Confederation
Warsaw Confederation
1573 - the official sanctioning of religious freedom in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth

The Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
had a long tradition of religious freedom. The right to worship freely was a basic right given to all inhabitants of the Commonwealth throughout the 15th and early 16th centuries, however, complete freedom of religion was officially recognized in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
in 1573 in the Warsaw Confederation. The Commonwealth kept religious-freedom laws during an era when religious persecution was an everyday occurrence in the rest of Europe.[40][page needed] The Warsaw Confederation
Warsaw Confederation
was a private compact signed by representatives of all the major religions in Polish and Lithuanian society, in which they pledged each other mutual support and tolerance. The confederation was incorporated into the Henrican articles, which constituted a virtual Polish–Lithuanian constitution. Edict of Nantes[edit] The Edict of Nantes, issued on April 13, 1598, by Henry IV of France, granted Protestants—notably Calvinist
Huguenots—substantial rights in a nation where Catholicism was the state religion. The main concern was civil unity;[41] The Edict separated civil law from religious rights, treated non-Catholics as more than mere schismatics and heretics for the first time, and opened a path for secularism and tolerance. In offering general freedom of conscience to individuals, the edict offered many specific concessions to the Protestants, such as amnesty and the reinstatement of their civil rights, including the right to work in any field or for the State, and to bring grievances directly to the king. The edict marked the end of the religious wars in France that tore apart the population during the second half of the 16th century. The Edict of Nantes
Edict of Nantes
was revoked in 1685 by King Louis XIV with the Edict of Fontainebleau, leading to renewed persecution of Protestants in France. Although strict enforcement of the revocation was relaxed during the reign of Louis XV, it was not until 102 years later, in 1787, when Louis XVI signed the Edict of Versailles—known as the Edict of Tolerance—that civil status and rights to form congregations by Protestants were restored.[42] In the Enlightenment[edit] Beginning in the Enlightenment commencing in the 1600s, politicians and commentators began formulating theories of religious toleration and basing legal codes on the concept. A distinction began to develop between civil tolerance, concerned with "the policy of the state towards religious dissent".,[43] and ecclesiastical tolerance, concerned with the degree of diversity tolerated within a particular church.[44] Milton[edit] John Milton
John Milton
(1608–1674), English Protestant poet and essayist, called in the Areopagitica
for "the liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties" (applied, however, only to the conflicting Protestant denominations, and not to atheists, Jews, Muslims or even Catholics). "Milton argued for disestablishment as the only effective way of achieving broad toleration. Rather than force a man's conscience, government should recognize the persuasive force of the gospel."[45] Rudolph II[edit] In 1609, Rudolph II
Rudolph II
decreed religious toleration in Bohemia.[46] In the American colonies[edit]

The Maryland Toleration
Act, passed in 1649.

In 1636, Roger Williams and companions at the foundation of Rhode Island entered into a compact binding themselves "to be obedient to the majority only in civil things". Williams spoke of "democracie or popular government."[47] Lucian Johnston writes, "Williams' intention was to grant an infinitely greater religious liberty than then existed anywhere in the world outside of the Colony of Maryland." In 1663, Charles II granted the colony a charter guaranteeing complete religious toleration.[48] Also in 1636, Congregationalist Thomas Hooker
Thomas Hooker
and a group of companions founded Connecticut. They combined the democratic form of government that had been developed by the Separatist Congregationalists in Plymouth Colony
Plymouth Colony
(Pilgrim Fathers) with unlimited freedom of conscience. Like Martin Luther, Hooker argued that as faith in Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ
was the free gift of the Holy Spirit
Holy Spirit
it could not be forced on a person.[49] In 1649 Maryland passed the Maryland Toleration
Act, also known as the Act Concerning Religion, a law mandating religious tolerance for Trinitarian Christians only (excluding Nontrinitarian
faiths). Passed on September 21, 1649 by the assembly of the Maryland colony, it was the first law requiring religious tolerance in the British North American colonies. The Calvert family
Calvert family
sought enactment of the law to protect Catholic settlers and some of the other denominations that did not conform to the dominant Anglicanism
of England and her colonies. In 1657, New Amsterdam, governed by Dutch Calvinists, granted religious toleration to Jews.[50] They had fled from Portuguese persecution in Brazil.[51] Spinoza[edit] Baruch Spinoza
Baruch Spinoza
(1632–1677) was a Dutch Jewish philosopher. He published the Theological-Political Treatise
Theological-Political Treatise
anonymously in 1670, arguing (according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) that "the freedom to philosophize can not only be granted without injury to piety and the peace of the Commonwealth, but that the peace of the Commonwealth and Piety are endangered by the suppression of this freedom", and defending, "as a political ideal, the tolerant, secular, and democratic polity". After interpreting certain Biblical texts, Spinoza opted for tolerance and freedom of thought in his conclusion that "every person is in duty bound to adapt these religious dogmas to his own understanding and to interpret them for himself in whatever way makes him feel that he can the more readily accept them with full confidence and conviction."[52] Locke[edit] English philosopher John Locke
John Locke
(1632–1704) published A Letter Concerning Toleration
in 1689. Locke's work appeared amidst a fear that Catholicism might be taking over England, and responds to the problem of religion and government by proposing religious toleration as the answer. Unlike Thomas Hobbes, who saw uniformity of religion as the key to a well-functioning civil society, Locke argued that more religious groups actually prevent civil unrest. In his opinion, civil unrest results from confrontations caused by any magistrate's attempt to prevent different religions from being practiced, rather than tolerating their proliferation. However, Locke denies religious tolerance for Catholics, for political reasons, and also for atheists because "Promises, covenants, and oaths, which are the bonds of human society, can have no hold upon an atheist". A passage Locke later added to the Essay concerning Human Understanding, questioned whether atheism was necessarily inimical to political obedience. Bayle[edit] Pierre Bayle
Pierre Bayle
(1647–1706) was a French Protestant scholar and philosopher who went into exile in Holland. In his "Dictionnaire Historique et Critique" and "Commentaire Philosophique" he advanced arguments for religious toleration (though, like some others of his time, he was not anxious to extend the same protection to Catholics he would to differing Protestant sects). Among his arguments were that every church believes it is the right one so "a heretical church would be in a position to persecute the true church". Bayle wrote that "the erroneous conscience procures for error the same rights and privileges that the orthodox conscience procures for truth."[53] Bayle was repelled by the use of scripture to justify coercion and violence: "One must transcribe almost the whole New Testament to collect all the Proofs it affords us of that Gentleness and Long-suffering, which constitute the distinguishing and essential Character of the Gospel." He did not regard toleration as a danger to the state, but to the contrary: "If the Multiplicity of Religions prejudices the State, it proceeds from their not bearing with one another but on the contrary endeavoring each to crush and destroy the other by methods of Persecution. In a word, all the Mischief arises not from Toleration, but from the want of it."[54] Act of Toleration[edit] The Act of Toleration, adopted by the British Parliament in 1689, allowed freedom of worship to Nonconformists who had pledged to the oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and rejected transubstantiation. The Nonconformists were Protestants who dissented from the Church of England such as Baptists
and Congregationalists. They were allowed their own places of worship and their own teachers, if they accepted certain oaths of allegiance. The Act did not apply to Catholics and non-trinitarians and continued the existing social and political disabilities for Dissenters, including their exclusion from political office and also from universities. Voltaire[edit] François-Marie Arouet, the French writer, historian and philosopher known as Voltaire
(1694–1778) published his Treatise on Toleration in 1763. In it he attacked religious views, but also said, "It does not require great art, or magnificently trained eloquence, to prove that Christians should tolerate each other. I, however, am going further: I say that we should regard all men as our brothers. What? The Turk my brother? The Chinaman my brother? The Jew? The Siam? Yes, without doubt; are we not all children of the same father and creatures of the same God?"[55] On the other hand, Voltaire
in his writings on religion was spiteful and intolerant of the practice of the Christian religion[citation needed], and Orthodox rabbi Joseph Telushkin has claimed that the most significant of Enlightenment hostility against Judaism
was found in Voltaire.[56] Lessing[edit] Gotthold Ephraim Lessing
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing
(1729–1781), German dramatist and philosopher, trusted in a " Christianity
of Reason", in which human reason (initiated by criticism and dissent) would develop, even without help by divine revelation. His plays about Jewish characters and themes, such as "Die Juden" and "Nathan der Weise", "have usually been considered impressive pleas for social and religious toleration".[57] The latter work contains the famous parable of the three rings, in which three sons represent the three Abrahamic religions, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. Each son believes he has the one true ring passed down by their father, but judgment on which is correct is reserved to God.[58] Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen[edit] The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen
Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen
(1789), adopted by the National Constituent Assembly during the French Revolution, states in Article 10: "No-one shall be interfered with for his opinions, even religious ones, provided that their practice does not disturb public order as established by the law." ("Nul ne doit être inquiété pour ses opinions, mêmes religieuses, pourvu que leur manifestation ne trouble pas l'ordre public établi par la loi.")[59] The First Amendment to the United States Constitution[edit]

For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions even on important subjects, which I once thought right, but found to be otherwise. It is therefore that the older I grow the more apt I am to doubt my own judgment, and to pay more respect to the judgment of others.

Benjamin Franklin

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified along with the rest of the Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791, included the following words:"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." In 1802, Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to the Danbury Baptists
Association in which he said: "...I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."[60] In the nineteenth century[edit] The process of legislating religious toleration went forward, while philosophers continued to discuss the underlying rationale. Roman Catholic Relief Act[edit] The Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829
Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829
adopted by the Parliament in 1829 repealed the last of the criminal laws (TEST ACTS) aimed at Catholic citizens of Great Britain. Mill[edit] John Stuart Mill's arguments in "On Liberty" (1859) in support of the freedom of speech were phrased to include a defense of religious toleration:

Let the opinions impugned be the belief of God
and in a future state, or any of the commonly received doctrines of morality... But I must be permitted to observe that it is not the feeling sure of a doctrine (be it what it may) which I call an assumption of infallibility. It is the undertaking to decide that question for others, without allowing them to hear what can be said on the contrary side. And I denounce and reprobate this pretension not the less if it is put forth on the side of my most solemn convictions.[61]

Renan[edit] In his 1882 essay "What is a Nation?", French historian and philosopher Ernest Renan
Ernest Renan
proposed a definition of nationhood based on "a spiritual principle" involving shared memories, rather than a common religious, racial or linguistic heritage. Thus members of any religious group could participate fully in the life of the nation. "You can be French, English, German, yet Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, or practicing no religion".[62] In the twentieth century[edit] In 1948, the United Nations
United Nations
General Assembly adopted Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states:

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance[63]

Even though not formally legally binding, the Declaration has been adopted in or influenced many national constitutions since 1948. It also serves as the foundation for a growing number of international treaties and national laws and international, regional, national and sub-national institutions protecting and promoting human rights including the freedom of religion. In 1965, The Roman Catholic Church
Catholic Church
Vatican II
Vatican II
Council issued the decree Dignitatis humanae (Religious Freedom) that states that all people must have the right to religious freedom.[64] In 1986, the first World Day of Prayer
Day of Prayer
for Peace was held in Assisi. Representatives of one hundred and twenty different religions came together for prayer to their God
or gods.[65] In 1988, in the spirit of Glasnost, Soviet premier Mikhail Gorbachev promised increased religious toleration.[66] In other religions[edit] Other major world religions also have texts or practices supporting the idea of religious toleration. Hindu
religion[edit] The Rigveda
says Ekam Sath Viprah Bahudha Vadanti which translates to "The truth is One, but sages call it by different Names".[67] Consistent with this tradition, India
chose to be a secular country even though it was divided partitioning on religious lines. Whatever intolerance, Hindu
scholars displayed towards other religions was subtle and symbolic and most likely was done to present a superior argument in defence of their own faith. Traditionally, Hindus showed their intolerance by withdrawing and avoiding contact with those whom they held in contempt, instead of using violence and aggression to strike fear in their hearts. Hinduism
is perhaps the only religion in the world which showed remarkable tolerance towards other religions in difficult times and under testing conditions. Even Buddhism, which spread in India
mostly through negative campaigns against Hinduism, cannot claim that credit. Criticizing other religions and showing them in poor light to attract converts to its own fold was never an approved practice in Hinduism.[68] Pluralism and tolerance of diversity are built into Hindu
theology India's long history is a testimony to its tolerance of religious diversity. Christianity
came to India
with St. Thomas in the first century CE, long before it became popular in the West. Judaism
came to India
after the Jewish temple was destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE and the Jews
were expelled from their homeland. In a recent book titled "Who are the Jews
of India?" (University of California Press, 2000), author Nathan Katz observes that India
is the only country where the Jews
were not persecuted. The Indian chapter is one of the happiest of the Jewish Diaspora. Both Christians and Jews
have existed in a predominant Hindu
for centuries without being persecuted. Zoroastrians from Persia
(present day Iran) entered India
in the 7th century to flee Islamic conquest. They are known as Parsis
in India. The Parsis
are an affluent community in the city of Mumbai
without a sense of having been persecuted through the centuries. Among the richest business families in India
are the Parsis; for example, the Tata family controls a huge industrial empire in various parts of the country. Mrs. Indira Gandhi, the powerful Prime Minister of India (1966–77; 1980–84), was married to Feroz Gandhi, a Parsi (no relation to Mahatma Gandhi). [69] Islam[edit] See also: Al-Baqara 256 Certain verses of the Qur'an
were interpreted to create a specially tolerated status for People of the Book, Jewish and Christian believers in the Old and New Testaments considered to have been a basis for Islamic religion:

Verily! Those who believe and those who are Jews
and Christians, and Sabians, whoever believes in God
and the Last Day and do righteous good deeds shall have their reward with their Lord, on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.[70]

Under Islamic law, Jews
and Christians were considered dhimmis, a legal status inferior to that of a Muslim but superior to that of other non-Muslims. Jewish communities in the Ottoman Empire
Ottoman Empire
held a protected status and continued to practice their own religion, as did Christians, though both were subject to additional restrictions, such as restrictions on the areas where they could live or work or in clothing,[71] and both had to pay additional taxes.[72] Yitzhak Sarfati, born in Germany, became the Chief Rabbi of Edirne
and wrote a letter inviting European Jews
to settle in the Ottoman Empire, in which he asked: "Is it not better for you to live under Muslims than under Christians?'".[73] Sultan Beyazid II
Beyazid II
(1481–1512), issued a formal invitation to the Jews
expelled from Catholic Spain and Portugal, leading to a wave of Jewish immigration. According to Michael Walzer:

The established religion of the [Ottoman] empire was Islam, but three other religious communities—Greek Orthodox, Armenian Orthodox, and Jewish—were permitted to form autonomous organizations. These three were equal among themselves, without regard to their relative numerical strength. They were subject to the same restrictions vis-à-vis Muslims—with regard to dress, proselytizing, and intermarriage, for example—and were allowed the same legal control over their own members.[74]

Buddhism[edit] Although Bhikkhu Bodhi
Bhikkhu Bodhi
states that the Buddha taught "the path to the supreme goal of the holy life is made known only in his own teaching", Buddhists have nevertheless shown significant tolerance for other religions: "Buddhist tolerance springs from the recognition that the dispositions and spiritual needs of human beings are too vastly diverse to be encompassed by any single teaching, and thus that these needs will naturally find expression in a wide variety of religious forms."[75] James Freeman Clarke said in Ten Great Religions (1871): "The Buddhists have founded no Inquisition; they have combined the zeal which converted kingdoms with a toleration almost inexplicable to our Western experience."[76] The Edicts of Ashoka
Edicts of Ashoka
issued by King Ashoka the Great
Ashoka the Great
(269–231 BCE), a Buddhist, declared ethnic and religious tolerance. His Edict XII, engraved in stone, stated: "The faiths of others all deserve to be honored for one reason or another. By honoring them, one exalts one's own faith and at the same time performs a service to the faith of others."[77] However, Buddhism
has also had controversies regarding toleration. See Dorje Shugden Controversy. In addition, the question of possible intolerance among Buddhists in Sri Lanka and Myanmar, primarily against Muslims, has been raised by Paul Fuller.[78] Tolerance and digital technologies[edit] The development of new digital technologies has resulted in an exponential growth in the volume of information and knowledge available, and made them more readily accessible to greater numbers of people throughout the world. As such, information and communication technologies can play an essential role in the sharing of knowledge and expertise in the service of sustainable development and in a spirit of solidarity. And yet, for many observers, the world is witnessing rising levels of ethnic, cultural and religious intolerance, often using the same communication technologies for ideological and political mobilization to promote exclusivist worldviews. This mobilization often leads to further criminal and political violence and to armed conflict.[79] This also leads to new modes of intolerance such as cyberbullying. Modern analyses and critiques[edit] Contemporary commentators have highlighted situations in which toleration conflicts with widely held moral standards, national law, the principles of national identity, or other strongly held goals. Michael Walzer
Michael Walzer
notes that the British in India
tolerated the Hindu practice of suttee (ritual burning of a widow) until 1829. On the other hand, the United States declined to tolerate the Mormon
practice of polygamy.[80] The French head scarf controversy represents a conflict between religious practice and the French secular ideal.[81] Toleration
of the Romani people
Romani people
in European countries is a continuing issue.[82] Modern definition[edit] Historian Alexandra Walsham notes that the modern understanding of the word "toleration" may be very different from its historic meaning.[83] Toleration
in modern parlance has been analyzed as a component of a liberal or libertarian view of human rights. Hans Oberdiek writes, "As long as no one is harmed or no one's fundamental rights are violated, the state should keep hands off, tolerating what those controlling the state find disgusting, deplorable or even debased. This for a long time has been the most prevalent defense of toleration by liberals... It is found, for example, in the writings of American philosophers John Rawls, Robert Nozick, Ronald Dworkin, Brian Barry, and a Canadian, Will Kymlicka, among others."[84] Isaiah Berlin
Isaiah Berlin
attributes to Herbert Butterfield the notion that "toleration... implies a certain disrespect. I tolerate your absurd beliefs and your foolish acts, though I know them to be absurd and foolish. Mill would, I think, have agreed."[85] John Gray states that "When we tolerate a practice, a belief or a character trait, we let something be that we judge to be undesirable, false or at least inferior; our toleration expresses the conviction that, despite its badness, the object of toleration should be left alone."[86] However, according to Gray, "new liberalism—the liberalism of Rawls, Dworkin, Ackerman and suchlike" seems to imply that "it is wrong for government to discriminate in favour of, or against, any form of life animated by a definite conception of the good".[87] John Rawls' "theory of 'political liberalism' conceives of toleration as a pragmatic response to the fact of diversity". Diverse groups learn to tolerate one another by developing "what Rawls calls 'overlapping consensus': individuals and groups with diverse metaphysical views or 'comprehensive schemes' will find reasons to agree about certain principles of justice that will include principles of toleration".[88] Herbert Marcuse
Herbert Marcuse
wrote "Repressive Tolerance" in 1965 where he argued that the "pure tolerance" that permits all favors totalitarianism, democracy, and tyranny of the majority, and insisted the "repressive tolerance" against them. Homosexuality[edit] As a result of his public debate with Baron Devlin on the role of the criminal law in enforcing moral norms, British legal philosopher H. L. A. Hart wrote Law, Liberty and Morality (1963) and The Morality of the Criminal Law (1965). His work on the relationship between law and morality had a significant effect on the laws of Great Britain, helping bring about the decriminalization of homosexuality. But it was Jeremy Bentham
Jeremy Bentham
that defended the rights for homosexuality with his essay "Offence against One's Self"[89] but could not be published until in 1978. Tolerating the intolerant[edit] Main article: Paradox of tolerance Walzer, Karl Popper[90] and John Rawls[91] have discussed the paradox of tolerating intolerance. Walzer asks "Should we tolerate the intolerant?" He notes that most minority religious groups who are the beneficiaries of tolerance are themselves intolerant, at least in some respects.[92] Rawls argues that an intolerant sect should be tolerated in a tolerant society unless the sect directly threatens the security of other members of the society. He links this principle to the stability of a tolerant society, in which members of an intolerant sect in a tolerant society will, over time, acquire the tolerance of the wider society. Other criticisms and issues[edit] Toleration
has been described as undermining itself via moral relativism: "either the claim self-referentially undermines itself or it provides us with no compelling reason to believe it. If we are skeptical about knowledge, then we have no way of knowing that toleration is good."[93] Ronald Dworkin
Ronald Dworkin
argues that in exchange for toleration, minorities must bear with the criticisms and insults which are part of the freedom of speech in an otherwise tolerant society.[94] Dworkin has also questioned whether the United States is a "tolerant secular" nation, or is re-characterizing itself as a "tolerant religious" nation, based on the increasing re-introduction of religious themes into conservative politics. Dworkin concludes that "the tolerant secular model is preferable, although he invited people to use the concept of personal responsibility to argue in favor of the tolerant religious model."[95] In The End of Faith, Sam Harris asserts that society should be unwilling to tolerate unjustified religious beliefs about morality, spirituality, politics, and the origin of humanity, especially beliefs which promote violence. See also[edit]

Anekantavada Christian debate on persecution and toleration International Day for Tolerance Islam
and other religions Multifaith space Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance Paradox of tolerance Religious discrimination Religious intolerance Religious liberty Religious persecution Religious pluralism Repressive Tolerance Secular state Separation of church and state Status of religious freedom by country


This article incorporates text from a free content work. Licensed under CC-BY-SA IGO 3.0 Licence statement: Rethinking Education: Towards a global common good?, 24, UNESCO. UNESCO. To learn how to add open-license text to articles, please see:Adding open license text to. For information on reusing text from, please see the terms of use.


^ Perez Zagorin, How the Idea of Religious Toleration
Came to the West (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2003) ISBN 0-691-09270-2, pp. 5–6, quoting D.D. Raphael et al. ^ "Tolerance". Merriam Webster. Retrieved 2012-03-07.  ^ "Toleration". Merriam Webster. Retrieved 2012-03-07.  ^ Joachim Vahland, 'Toleranzdiskurse', Zeno no. 37 (2017), pp. 7-25 ^ "Tolerance". Merriam Webster. Retrieved 2012-04-07.  ^ "Tolerance". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 2012-04-07.  ^ a b Fisher, William Bayne; Gershevitch, I. (1968). The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge University Press. p. 412. ISBN 9780521200912.  ^ "Book of Ezra King James Bible". Kingjamesbibletrust.org. Archived from the original on May 10, 2011. Retrieved March 21, 2011.  ^ Walzer, Michael (1997). On Toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 17. ISBN 0-300-07600-2.  ^ Witte, John Jr. and Johan D. van de Vyver, Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective (The Hague: Kluwer 1996) p. 74 ISBN 90-411-0176-4 ^ Logan, Donald F., A history of the church in the Middle Ages
Middle Ages
(New York:Routledge, 2002) ISBN 0-415-13289-4, p. 8 ^ "Valerius Maximianus Galerius", Karl Hoeber, Catholic Encyclopedia 1909 Ed, retrieved 1 June 2007. ^ February 5, 2008 posting by Rabbi David Kominsky ...For You Were Strangers in the Land of Egypt. Accessed January 25, 2011 ^ Walzer, Michael On Toleration
(New Haven: Yale University Press 1997) pp. 80–81 ^ Richard Landes (2000). "The Birth of Heresy: A Millennial Phenomenon". Journal of Religious History. 24 (1): 26–43. doi:10.1111/1467-9809.00099.  ^ Jeffrey Burton Russell, Dissent and Order in the Middle Ages: The Search for Legitimate Authority (New York: Twayne Publishers 1992), p. 23 ^ James P. Byrd (2002). The challenges of Roger Williams: religious liberty, violent persecution, and the Bible. Mercer University Press. ISBN 978-0-86554-771-1. Retrieved 15 June 2011.  ^ a b Walsham 2006: 234. ^ Ellwood, Robert S. and Gregory D. Alles, eds. (2007), The Encyclopedia of World Religions, New York, N.Y., p. 431 ^ Fudge, Thomas A. (2013), The Trial of Jan Hus. Medieval Heresy and Criminal Procedures, Oxford
University Press, New <York, N.Y. ^ Drake, H. A. (November 1996). "Lambs into Lions: Explaining Early Christian Intolerance". Past & Present. 153: 3–36. doi:10.1093/past/153.1.3. JSTOR 651134.  ^ Tuchman, Barbara, A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century (New York: Alfred A. Knopf 1978), p. 113 ^ Rummel, Erika, "The case against Johann Reuchlin" (pp. iv–xv) University of Toronto Press, 2002 ISBN 0-8020-8484-2, ISBN 978-0-8020-8484-2. ^ Poland. Jewish Virtual Library. Retrieved on 2011-06-15. ^ Remer, Gary, Humanism and the Rhetoric of Toleration
(University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press 1996) p. 95 ISBN 0-271-02811-4 ^ James Anthony Froude; Desiderius Erasmus
Desiderius Erasmus
(1894). Life and letters of Erasmus: lectures delivered at Oxford
1893-4. Longmans, Green. pp. 359–. Retrieved 15 June 2011.  ^ Marius, Richard Thomas More: a biography (Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University press, 1999) p. 175 ISBN 0-674-88525-2 ^ Marius, Richard Thomas More: a biography (Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University press, 1999) p. 386 ISBN 0-674-88525-2 ^ Olmstead, Clifton E. (1960), History of Religion
in the United States, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., p. 5 ^ Winkler, Hermann August (2012), Geschichte des Westens. Von den Anfängen in der Antike bis zum 20. Jahrhundert, Third, Revised Edition, Munich (Germany), p. 152 ^ Ohst, Martin (2005), Toleranz/ Intoleranz, in Die Religion
in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Fourth Edition, Tübingen (Germany), Volume 8, col. 463 ^ Heinrich Bornkamm (1962), Toleranz. In der Geschichte des Christentums, in Die Religion
in Geschichte und Gegenwart, Third Edition, Tübingen (Germany), Vol. VI, col. 937-938 ^ Karl Heussi (1957), Kompendium der Kirchengeschichte, Eleventh Edition, Tübingen (Germany), pp. 316, 328 ^ Gonzalez Echeverría, Fco Javier (2012). El Amor a la Verdad. Vida y Obra de Miguel Servet p. 256. "Inherent of human condition is the sickness of believing the rest are impostors and heathen, and not ourselves, because nobody recognizes his own mistakes [..] If one must condemn everyone that misses in a particular point then every mortal would have to be burnt a thousand times. The apostles and Luther himself have been mistaken [..] If I have taken the word, by any reason, it has been because I think it is grave to kill men, under the pretext that they are mistaken on the interpretation of some point, for we know that even the chosen ones are not exempt from sometimes being wrong" (Michael Servetus) ^ Heinrich Bornkamm (1962), col. 939 ^ Zweig, Stefan (1951). Erasmus; The Right to Heresy: Castellio against Calvin. London: Cassell. p. 312. OCLC 24340377.  ^ Sebastian Castellio, Contra libellum, # 77, Vaticanus. ^ E.M. Curley, "Skepticism and Toleration: the Case of Montaigne", Accessed February 27, 2011 ^ Grossman, Walter (1979). "Toleration—Exercitium Religionis Privatum". Journal of the History of Ideas. 40 (1): 129–34. doi:10.2307/2709265. JSTOR 2709265.  ^ Zamoyski, Adam. The Polish Way. New York: Hippocrene Books, 1987 ^ In 1898 the tricentennial celebrated the Edict as the foundation of the coming Age of Toleration; the 1998 anniversary, by contrast, was commemorated with a book of essays under the evocatively ambivalent title, Coexister dans l'intolérance (Michel Grandjean and Bernard Roussel, editors, Geneva, 1998). ^ Encyclopedia of the Age of Political Ideals, Edict of Versailles (1787) Archived 2012-07-14 at the Wayback Machine., downloaded 29 January 2012 ^ John Coffey, Persecution
and Toleration
in Protestant England, 1558–1689. Longman Publishing Group (2000). ISBN 0-582-30465-2. p. 11 ^ Coffey, p. 12 ^ Hunter, William Bridges A Milton Encyclopedia, Volume 8(East Brunswick, NJ: Associated University Presses, 1980) pp. 71, 72 ISBN 0-8387-1841-8 ^ "Rudolph II", Encyclopædia Britannica 15 Edition, retrieved 1 June 2007. ^ Heinrich August Winkler, Geschichte des Westens. Von den Anfängen in der Antike bis zum 20. Jahrhundert, Third Edition, 2012, Munich (Germany), p. 262 ^ Johnston, Lucian, Religious Liberty in Maryland and Rhode Island (Brooklyn: International Catholic Truth Society, 1903), p. 30, 38 ^ Clifton E. Olmstead, History of Religion
in the United States", 1960, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 74-75 ^ Hasia R. Diner, The Jews
of the United States, 1654 to 2000, 2004, University of California Press, ISBN 0-520-24848-1, pp. 13–15 ^ Clifton E. Olmsted (1960) p. 124 ^ "Barcuch Spinoza", revised June 2008, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Accessed February 25, 2011 ^ "Pierre Bayle", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, updated August 19, 2008. Accessed March 6, 2011 ^ Joseph LoConte, "The Golden Rule of Toleration". Accessed March 6, 2011 ^ Voltaire
A Treatise on Toleration
Archived 2006-01-07 at the Wayback Machine. (1763) ^ Prager, D; Telushkin, J. Why the Jews?: The Reason for Antisemitism. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1983. page 128-9. ^ R. Robertson (1998). "'Dies Hohe Lied der Duldung'? The Ambiguities of Toleration
in Lessing's Die Juden and Nathan der Weise". The Modern language Review. 93 (1): 105–120. doi:10.2307/3733627. JSTOR 3733627.  ^ Dirk Martin Grube, "Gotthold Ephraim Lessing's Ring Parable: An Enlightenment Voice on Religious Tolerance", in Boeve, Lieven, Faith in the Enlightenment? The critique of the Enlightenment revisited (New York:Rodopi 2006) p. 39ff ISBN 978-90-420-2067-2 ^ "Déclaration des droits de l'Homme et du citoyen de 1789". Accessed March 22, 2011 ^ Jefferson's Letter to the Danbury Baptists
Danbury Baptists
(June 1998) – Library of Congress Information
Bulletin. Loc.gov. Retrieved on 2011-06-15. ^ John Stuart Mill
John Stuart Mill
(1806–1873) “On Liberty” 1859. ed. Gertrude Himmelfarb, UK: Penguin, 1985, pp. 83–84 ^ Ernest Renan, "Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?", conference faite en Sorbonne, le 11 Mars 1882. Accessed January 13, 2011 ^ "The Universal Declaration of Human Rights", United Nations
United Nations
1948, retrieved 1 June 2007. ^ Dignitatis humanae, Decree on Religious Freedom, 1965, retrieved 1 June 2007. ^ "ADDRESS OF JOHN PAUL II TO THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCHES AND ECCLESIAL COMMUNITIES AND OF THE WORLD RELIGIONS" (1986) retrieved 1 June 2007. ^ "Russia", Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved on 2011-06-15. ^ " Hinduism
– a general introduction". Religioustolerance.org. Retrieved 2012-06-21.  ^ "evidence of tolerance". Jayaram V/Aniket Patil. Retrieved 2014-08-17.  ^ "RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE AND HINDUISM" (PDF). Dr. M. Lal Goel/Aniket. Retrieved 2014-08-17.  ^ Quran 2:62 ^ H. Inalcik; The Ottoman Empire: The Classical Age 1300–1600, Phoenix Press, (2001) ^ D. Quataert, The Ottoman Empire, 1700–1922, CUP, 2005 ^ B. Lewis, "The Jews
of Islam", New York (1984), pp. 135–136 ^ Michael Walzer, On Toleration
(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997) ISBN 0300076002 p. 17 ^ Bhikkhu Bodhi, "Tolerance and Diversity". Access to Insight, 5 June 2010. Accessed March 6, 2011 ^ Tweed, Thomas, The American Encounter with Buddhism, 1844–1912 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press 2000) p. 101 ISBN 0-8078-4906-5 ^ Kristin Scheible, "Towards a Buddhist Policy of Tolerance: the case of King Ashoka" in Neusner, Jacob, ed. Religious Tolerance in World Religions (West Conshohocken, PA, Templeton Foundation Prsss 2008) p. 323 ^ http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2146000,00.html ^ Rethinking Education: Towards a global common good? (PDF). UNESCO. 2015. p. 24. ISBN 978-92-3-100088-1.  ^ Michael Walzer, On Toleration, (New Haven: Yale University Press 1997) p. 61 ISBN 0-300-07600-2 ^ John Bowen, "Muslims and Citizens", The Boston Review February–March 2004. Accessed January 25, 2011 ^ "Romanies: A long road", The Economist September 16, 2010. Accessed March 22, 2011 ^ Alexandra Walsham, Charitable Hatred: Tolerance and Intolerance in England, 1500–1700. Manchester University Press (2006) ISBN 0-7190-5239-4 p. 233. ^ Oberdiek, Hans, Tolerance: between forebearance and acceptance (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001) p. vi ISBN 0-8476-8785-6 ^ Isaiah Berlin, "Four Essays on Liberty," London, Oxford
and New York: Oxford
University Press, 1969, p.184. ^ John Gray, "Enlightenment's Wake," London and New York: Routledge, p.19. ^ Gray (1995), p.20. ^ "Toleration", The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Accessed March 21, 2011 ^ "Offence against One's Self". Columbia.edu. 2010-06-11. Retrieved 2012-06-21.  ^ Karl Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. 1, Notes to the Chapters: Ch. 7, Note 4. ^ John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, 1971, p. 216. ^ Michael Walzer, On Toleration, (New Haven: Yale University Press 1997) pp. 80-81 ISBN 0-300-07600-2 ^ "Toleration", The Internet encyclopedia of Philosophy, Accessed March 21, 2011 ^ Ronald Dworkin, "Even bigots and Holocaust deniers must have their say", The Guardian, February 14, 2006. retrieved March 21, 2011 ^ "Dworkin Explores Secular, Religious Models for Society", Virginia Law School News and Events, April 18, 2008. accessed March 21, 2011

Further reading[edit]

Barzilai, Gad (2007). Law and Religion. Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-2494-3.  Beneke, Chris (September 2006). Beyond Toleration: The Religious Origins of American Pluralism. Oxford
University Press, USA. ISBN 0-19-530555-8.  Coffey, John (2000). Persecution
and Toleration
in Protestant England, 1558–1689. Longman Publishing Group. ISBN 0-582-30465-2.  Curry, Thomas J. (1989-12-19). Church and State in America to the Passage of the First Amendment. Oxford
University Press; Reprint edition (December 19, 1989). ISBN 0-19-505181-5.  Grell, Ole Peter; Roy Porter, eds. (2000). Toleration
in Enlightenment Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-65196-7.  Hamilton, Marci A. (2005-06-17). God
vs. the Gavel: Religion
and the Rule of Law. Edward R. Becker (Foreword). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-85304-4.  Hanson, Charles P. (1998). Necessary Virtue: The Pragmatic Origins of Religious Liberty in New England. University Press of Virginia. ISBN 0-8139-1794-8.  Kaplan, Benjamin J. (2007). Divided by Faith: Religious Conflict and the Practice of Toleration
in Early Modern Europe. Belknap Press. ISBN 0-674-02430-3.  Laursen, John Christian; Nederman, Cary, eds. (December 1997). Beyond the Persecuting Society: Religious Toleration
Before the Enlightenment. University of Pennsylvania Press (December 1997). ISBN 0-8122-3331-X.  Murphy, Andrew R. (July 2001). Conscience and Community: Revisiting Toleration
and Religious Dissent in Early Modern England and America. Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0-271-02105-5.  Oberdiek, Hans (2001). Tolerance: between forebearance and acceptance. Rowman and Littlefield. ISBN 0-8476-8785-6.  Tausch, Arno, Are Practicing Catholics More Tolerant of Other Religions than the Rest of the World? Comparative Analyses Based on World Values Survey Data (November 21, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3075315 or https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3075315

Tønder, Lars (September 2013). Tolerance: A Sensorial Orientation to Politics. Oxford
University Press. ISBN 9780199315802.  Walsham, Alexandra (September 2006). Charitable Hatred: Tolerance and Intolerance in England, 1500–1700. Manchester University Press. ISBN 0-7190-5239-4.  Zagorin, Perez (2003). How the Idea of Religious Toleration
Came to the West. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-12142-7. 

External links[edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Tolerance.

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Toleration

Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: God
and Religious Toleration

and Foreign Policy Initiative, Council on Foreign Relations Background to the United Nations
United Nations
Universal Declaration of Human Rights Text of the United Nations
United Nations
Universal Declaration of Human Rights "Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance". Various information on sensible religious topics. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance.  Religious Tolerance at Curlie (based on DMOZ) History of Religious Tolerance Outline for a Discussion on Toleration
(Karen Barkey) The Foundation against Intolerance of Religious Minorities Teaching Tolerance "Toleration". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 

v t e

Religious pluralism

Category:Religious pluralism


Belief system Comparative religion Comparative theology Dogmatism History of religious pluralism Inclusivism Indifferentism Interfaith dialogue Interfaith marriage Mirari vos Moral relativism Multiconfessionalism

Confessionalism (politics)

Multifaith space Multiple religious belonging Philosophy of religion Religious pluralism Religious syncretism Separation of church and state Spiritual but not religious Syncretism Toleration Universalism


Eknath Easwaran John Hick Gary Legenhausen John Courtney Murray Swami Vivekananda


and Christianity Buddhism
and Hinduism Three teachings

portal Spirituality
portal Philosophy portal

v t e


Major religious groups
Major religious groups
and religious denominations




Haredi Hasidic Modern

Conservative Reform Karaite Reconstructionist Renewal Humanistic Haymanot



Eastern Catholic Churches

Eastern Christianity

Church of the East

Assyrian Church of the East

Eastern Orthodoxy Oriental Orthodoxy

Ethiopian Orthodoxy

Independent Catholicism

Old Catholicism


Adventism Anabaptism Anglicanism Baptists Calvinism

Presbyterianism Congregationalism Continental Reformed

Lutheranism Methodism Pentecostalism Evangelicalism


Jehovah's Witnesses Mormonism Jesuism




Hanafi Maliki Hanbali Shafi'i


Twelver Isma'ilism Zaidiyyah

Ahmadi Ibadi Non-denominational Quranism Zahirism Salafism

Wahhabism Ahl al-Hadith

Mahdavia European Islam Nation of Islam



Azáli Bábism Bahá'í Faith

Druze Mandaeism Rastafari Samaritanism



Vaishnavism Shaktism Shaivism Ayyavazhi Smartism Balinese




Zen Thiền Seon

Pure Land Nichiren Madhyamaka Tiantai

Theravada Vajrayana

Tibetan Shingon Newar Bon



Dravidian Jainism

Digambara Śvētāmbara

Sikhism Gurung shamanism Bon
Lamaism Kirant Mundhum


Manichaeism Yazdânism

Yazidism Ishikism Ali-Illahism Yarsanism



Armenian Baltic

Dievturība Druwi Romuva

Caucasian Celtic


Germanic Hellenism Italo-Roman Romanian Slavic


Finnish Hungarian Uralic

Mari Mordvin Udmurt

Central and Northern Asian

Burkhanism Chuvash Manchu Mongolian Siberian Tengrism

East Asian

Benzhuism Bimoism Bon Cheondoism Confucianism Dongbaism Faism Hmongism Jeungsanism Luoism Meishanism Mileism Muism Neo-Confucianism Ryukyuan religion Shenism Shigongism Shinto Taoism Tenrikyo Wuism Yiguandao

Southeast Asian

Burmese Satsana Phi Malaysian Indonesian

Marapu Kaharingan Kebatinan

Philippine Vietnamese

Caodaism Đạo Mẫu Hoahaoism



Akan Akamba Baluba Bantu Berber Bushongo Cushitic Dinka Efik Fon and Ewe Guanche Igbo Isoko Lotuko Lozi Lugbara Maasai Mbuti San Serer Tumbuka Waaq Yoruba Zulu


Candomblé Kumina Obeah Quimbanda Palo Santería Umbanda Vodou Voodoo Winti

Other groups

Bathouism Bongthingism Donyi-Polo Kiratism Sanamahism Sarnaism Aboriginal Australian Native American Mesoamerican Hawaiian Polynesian


Discordianism Eckankar Jediism New Age New Thought Pastafarianism Raëlism Satanism Scientology Thelema Unitarian Universalism Wicca

Historical religions



Near East

Arabian Egyptian Mesopotamian Semitic

Canaanite Yahwism



Proto-Indo-Iranian Armenian Ossetian Vedic Zoroastrianism

Mithraism Zurvanism




Celtic Germanic

Anglo-Saxon Continental Norse


Gnosticism Neoplatonism

Manichaeism Balkan Roman Slavic



Apostasy / Disaffiliation Behaviour Beliefs Clergy Conversion Deities Entheogens Ethnic religion Denomination Faith Fire Folk religion God Meditation Monasticism

monk nun

Mysticism Mythology Nature Ordination Orthodoxy Orthopraxy Prayer Prophesy Religious experience Ritual

liturgy sacrifice

Spirituality Supernatural Symbols Truth Water Worship


Animism Deism Dualism Henotheism Monotheism Nontheism Panentheism Pantheism Polytheism Transtheism

Religious studies

Anthropology Cognitive science Comparative Development Evolutionary origin Evolutionary psychology History Philosophy Neurotheology Psychology Sociology Theology Theories Women

and society

Agriculture Business Clergy

monasticism ordination


evangelism missionary proselytism

Education Fanaticism Freedom

pluralism syncretism toleration universalism

Fundamentalism Growth Happiness Homosexuality Minorities National church National religiosity levels Religiocentrism Political science Populations Schism Science State Theocracy Vegetarianism Video games Violence

persecution terrorism war


and irreligion

Antireligion Deism Agnosticism Atheism Criticism LaVeyan Satanism Deconstruction Humanistic Judaism Irreligion by country Objectivism Secular humanism Secular theology Secularization Separation of church and state Unaffiliated

Overviews and lists

Index Outline Timeline Abrahamic prophets Deification Deities Founders Mass gatherings New religious movements Organizations Religions and spiritual traditions Scholars

Category Portal

v t e

and politics

Christian left Christian right

Key concepts

Separation of church and state "Render unto Caesar" Two kingdoms doctrine Freedom of religion


Christian anarchism Christian democracy Clerical fascism Communalism Christian communism Distributism Evangelical left Christian feminism Christian libertarianism National Catholicism Christian pacifism Political Catholicism Christian Reconstructionism Christian socialism Theodemocracy Christian Zionism


Abortion Homosexuality Poverty and wealth


Catholic social teaching Dominion Theology Liberation theology Political theology

Middle East Sub-Saharan Africa China

Social Gospel Symphonia

Christian state

Caesaropapism Christian republic Divine right of kings

Related topics

and other religions Civil religion Political science of religion State religion

v t e


General forms

Age Caste Class Color Disability Gender Genotype Hair Height Language Looks Mental condition Race / Ethnicity / Nationality Rank Religion Sex Sexuality Size Species


AIDS stigma Adultism Anti-albinism Anti-autism Anti-homelessness Anti-intellectualism Anti-intersex Anti-left handedness Anti-Masonry Antisemitism Audism Binarism Biphobia Cronyism Drug use Elitism Ephebiphobia Ethnopluralism Fatism Genderism Gerontophobia Heteronormativity Heterosexism Homophobia Islamophobia Leprosy stigma Lesbophobia Mentalism Misandry Misogyny Nepotism Pedophobia Pregnancy Reverse Sectarianism Shadism Supremacism

Arab Black White

Transmisogyny Transphobia Vegaphobia Xenophobia


Animal cruelty Animal testing Blood libel Blood sport Carnism Compulsory sterilization Counter-jihad Cultural genocide Democide Disability
hate crime Educational Economic Eliminationism Employment Enemy of the people Ethnic cleansing Ethnic hatred Ethnic joke Ethnocide Forced conversion Freak show Gay bashing Gendercide Genital mutilation Genocide


Glass ceiling Group libel Hate crime Hate group Hate speech Homeless dumping Housing Indian rolling LGBT
hate crime Lavender scare Lynching Meat eating Mortgage Murder music Occupational segregation Persecution Pogrom Purge Race war Red Scare Religious persecution Scapegoating Segregation academy Sex-selective abortion Slavery Slut-shaming Trans bashing Victimisation Violence against women White flight White power music Wife selling Witch-hunt

Discriminatory policies


age racial religious sex

Age of candidacy Blood quantum Cleanliness of blood Crime of apartheid Disabilities

Jewish Catholic

Ethnocracy Gender pay gap Gender roles Gerontocracy Gerrymandering Ghetto benches Internment Jewish quota Jim Crow laws Law for Protection of the Nation McCarthyism MSM blood donor controversy Nonpersons Numerus clausus (as religious or racial quota) Nuremberg Laws One-drop rule Racial quota Racial steering Redlining Same-sex marriage
Same-sex marriage
(laws and issues prohibiting) Sodomy law Ugly law Voter suppression


Affirmative action Animal rights Anti-discrimination law Cultural assimilation Cultural pluralism Desegregation Diversity training Empowerment Feminism Fighting Discrimination Human rights Intersex rights Multiculturalism Nonviolence Racial integration Self-determination Social integration Toleration Vegetarianism Veganism

Related topics

Allophilia Anthropocentrism Anti-cultural sentiment Assimilation Bias Christian privilege Data discrimination Dehumanization Diversity Ethnic penalty Eugenics Intersectionality Male privilege Masculism Multiculturalism Neurodiversity Oikophobia Oppression Police brutality Political correctness Power distance Prejudice Racial bias in criminal news Racism
by country Regressive left Religious intolerance Second-generation gender bias Snobbery Social exclusion Social stigma Stereotype


White privilege

Category Portal

Authority control

GND: 40603