Rambhadracharya's literary style

Jagadguru Ramanandacharya Swami Rambhadracharya is a Hindu religious leader, Sanskrit scholar and '' Katha'' artist based in Chitrakoot, India. Rambhadracharya is a spontaneous poet and writer in Sanskrit, Hindi, Awadhi, Maithili, and several other languages.Dinkar 2008, p. 39. He has authored more than 100 books and 50 papers, including four epic poems, a Hindi commentary on Tulsidas' ''Ramcharitmanas'', a Sanskrit commentary in verse on the Ashtadhyayi, and Sanskrit commentaries on the Prasthanatrayi scriptures.Dinkar 2008, pp. 40–43. He is regarded as one of the greatest authorities on Tulsidas in India,Prasad 1999, p. xiv: "Acharya Giridhar Mishra is responsible for many of my interpretations of the epic. The meticulousness of his profound scholarship and his extraordinary dedication to all aspects of Rama's story have led to his recognition as one of the greatest authorities on Tulasidasa in India today ... that the Acharya's knowledge of the Ramacharitamanasa is vast and breathtaking and that he is one of those rare scholars who knows the text of the epic virtually by heart." and is the editor of a critical edition of the Ramcharitmanas.

Many Sanskrit and Hindi authors have critiqued and reviewed the works and the literary style of Rambhadracharya, prominent among them being Kalika Prasad Shukla, Rewa Prasad Dwivedi, Devarshi Kala Nath Shastry and Abhiraj Rajendra Mishra. In his conversations and speeches, Rambhadracharya often employs extemporaneously composed verses in ''Upajāti'' metre and the ''Daṇḍaka'' style with long adjectives. In his poems, the three classical styles of ''Pāñcālī'', ''Vaidarbhī'' and ''Lāṭī'' are dominant. Some distinguishing features of his Sanskrit poetry include use of rhyme (''Antyānuprāsa''), employment of a variety of metres including many Prakrit and Hindi metres, new usages, and the ''Gīti'' style. Rambhadracharya is credited with reviving the letter-poem (''Patrakāvya'') genre in Sanskrit after 2000 years. His Sanskrit commentaries have a broad coverage with theories supported by evidence, novel interpretations, elaborate derivations, and an independent style with quotes from the works of Tulsidas accompanied by Sanskrit poetic translations. His Hindi lyrical works follow the Bhojpuri tradition with emphasis on both the aesthetics and emotion. Optimism, devotion to motherland, and patriotism are some more features of his works which are seen in several poems and plays.

Overview

Rewa Prasad Dwivedi writes in his Sanskrit poem dedicated to Rambhadracharya that he is an encyclopedia of learning whose literature is like numerous Narmada rivers flowing out simultaneously, and in whose literary works Shiva and Parvati delight while performing Tandava and Lasya.Dwivedi, Rewa Prasad. "विलसन्ति रामभद्राः he revered Rambhadracharya is resplendent (in Sanskrit). In Sharma, Sushil and Shrivastav (2011), pp. 643–648. "येषामास्यमहाभ्रकूटशिखरादाविर्भवन्त्येकदैवानेकाः खलु नर्मदास्त्रिजगतीं सम्प्लावयन्त्यो गिरः। तेषां वस्तु किमस्तु दुर्लभमिह श्रीरामभक्तः शिवो यद्वाचां प्रसरेषु नृत्यति मुदा देव्या भवान्या समम्॥", "तं सारस्वतकोशमद्भुतमिमं श्रीरामभद्राभिधं किं सम्भावयितुं क्रमेत न सुधीप्रज्ञावतां मण्डलम्॥".

Devarshi Kala Nath Shastry writes in his review of Rambhadracharya's works that Rambhadracharya is an accomplished and eloquent poet who is the foremost among scholars and is also well-versed in all scriptures. Shastry writes that among Sanskrit poets, only Śrīharṣa (poet of ''Naiṣadhīyacaritam'') has been described as having such wonderful command over Sanskrit as Rambhadracharya has.Shastry, Devarshi Kala Nath. "अलौकिक प्रतिभा को श्रद्धार्घ्य reverential offering to a superhuman talent (in Hindi). In Sharma, Sushil and Shrivastav (2011), pp. 643–648.

Features

Shastry writes that Rambhadracharya even talks in extemporaneously composed poetry with Sanskrit scholars, usually in the ''Upajāti'' metre. Rambhadracharya uses with great effect the ''Daṇḍaka'' style with Sanskrit adjectives in his speeches. Shastry recounts a use of a long sentence in the ''Daṇḍaka'' style at a speech in Jaipur in July 2003 by Rambhadracharya, in which one sentence with multiple adjectives lasted around seven minutes and was "replete with poetic beauty".

Shastry says that rhyme (''Antyānuprāsa'') is a distinguishing feature of Rambhadracharya's Sanskrit poetry. Shastry notes that another feature of Rambhadracharya's works is the devotion to motherland and patriotism, which is most evident in the poetic work ''Ājādacandraśekharacaritam'' on the life of Chandrashekhar Azad. Shastry says that this strong feeling of love towards motherland is reminiscent of old Sanskrit literature including Prithvi Sukta of Atharva Veda, various Puranas including Bhagavata Purana, and also in the Sanskrit works of Swami Bhagavadacharya, a former Jagadguru Ramanandacharya.

Dinkar notes that in the poems of Rambhadracharya, the three poetical styles of ''Pāñcālī'' (secondary figurative sense with short and sweet-sounding compounds), ''Vaidarbhī'' (with compounds and soft contexts and without many figures of speech) and ''Lāṭī'' (with precise contexts and without many figures of speech) are dominant.

Rasas

The principal Rasa (emotion or mood) of Śrībhārgavarāghavīyam is the ''Vīra Rasa'' (the emotion of heroism). Like the previously composed Mahākāvyas, Śrībhārgavarāghavīyam has all the eight Rasas as enunciated by Bharata Muni. These Rasas are – ''Śringāra'' (eros and beauty), ''Vīra'' (heroism or bravery), ''Hāsya'' (mirth), ''Raudra'' (fury), ''Karuṇa'' (compassion), ''Bībhatsa'' (disgust), ''Bhayānaka'' (horror), ''Adbhuta'' (amazement). Apart from this Śrībhārgavarāghavīyam also has the ninth ''Rasa'' as propounded by Mammaṭa – the '' Śānta'' Rasa (calmness), and the three new Rasas as – ''Bhakti'' (devotion), ''Vatsala'' (parental love) and ''Preyas'' (love). The principle Rasas in the '' Ashtavakra (epic)'' are the ''Vīra'' and the ''Karuṇa''.Rambhadracharya 2010, pp. ''ka''–''ga''. Like the 10th canto of Śrīmad Bhāgavatam and Bālakāṇḍa of the Rāmacaritamānasa, twelve verses in the seventeenth canto (17.42–17.53) of Śrībhārgavarāghavīyam have all the twelve Rasas used in the same context. While the pure Śṛngāra Rasa is the dominant Rasa in '' Bhṛṅgadūtam'', '' Śrīsītārāmakelikaumudī'' is a work primarily of Vātsalya Rasa mixed with Śṛngāra Rasa. ''Rāghavagītaguñjana'' and ''Bhaktigītasudhā'' are works full of the Bhakti Rasa.

Styles of individual works

''Śrībhārgavarāghavīyam''

Shastry critiqued the work ''Śrībhārgavarāghavīyam'' in the January 2003 issue of the Sanskrit monthly ''Bhāratī''. Shastry writes that the work has poetic excellence, variety of meters and dexterity of language which has not been seen hitherto in Sanskrit epics. Shastry finds the twentieth canto of the epic to be an excellent illustration of Sanskrit poetry in Prakrit verses, a style which was pioneered by Shastry's father, Bhatt Mathuranath Shastri. The 20th canto has 63 Sanskrit verses (20.1–20.63) composed in Prakrit metres, namely Kirīṭa (Meduradanta, a type of Sapādikā), Ghanākṣarī, Duramilā (Dvimilā, a type of Sapādikā), Mattagajendra (a type of Sapādikā), Śaṭpada and Harigītaka. The language of the verses in Sanskrit, but the metres and the prosody rules follow Prakrit prosody. An example is the following verse (20.13) in the Ghanākṣarī metre, which consists of 32 syllables in every foot.

Dr. Brajesh Dikshit, Sanskrit scholar from Jabalpur, says that ''Śrībhārgavarāghavīyam'' combines the styles of three previous Sanskrit epics - it has two leading characters like in Bhāravi's ''Kirātārjunīyam'', the poetic excellence and variety of prosodic metres is like in Śrīharṣa's ''Naiṣadhīyacaritam'', while the length and extent of the work is like the ''Śiśupālavadham'' of Māgha.Dikshit, Dr. Brajendra. "अतुला गीर्जगद्गुरोः he speech of Jagadguru is incomparable (in Sanskrit, Hindi). In Sharma, Sushil and Shrivastav (2011), pp. 719–721.

Abhiraj Rajendra Mishra, former Vice-Chancellor of Sampurnanand Sanskrit University wrote in the introduction to Śrībhārgavarāghavīyam that the epic nourishes the tradition of Ṛṣis, and with this composition the contemporary Sanskrit literature has been blessed.

''Śrīrāghavakṛpābhāṣyam''

Dr. Shivram Sharma, Sanskrit scholar from Varanasi, writes in his review of '' Śrīrāghavakṛpābhāṣyam'' on the eleven Upanishads that it is replete with novel thoughts and Sanskrit derivations, and that Rambhadracharya has shown Rama as the ''Pratipādya'' of the all Upanishads by the wonderful dexterity of ''Vyutpatti''s of Sanskrit words. Sharma adds that the style of interspersed Sanskrit translations of the works of Tulsidas further enhances the literary merit of the work. Dr. Vishnu Dutt Rakesh, Hindi professor and author from Haridwar, says that the ''Śrīrāghavakṛpābhāṣyam'' on Bhagavad Gita has the broadest coverage of all Sanskrit commentaries on Gita with "convincing discussion, propounding of theories with evidence, contradiction of others, creative genius and an independent style of composition".Rakesh, Dr. Vishnu Dutt. ''Śrīrāghavakṛpābhāṣya – Commentary on Śrīmadbhagavadgītā''. In Nagar (2002), pp. 735–743. Dikshit says that the ''Śrīrāghavakṛpābhāṣyam'' on the Prasthānatrayī is formidable and adorns the Ramananda tradition with greatness. He adds that the ''Śrīrāghavakṛpābhāṣyam'' on Narada Bhakti Sutra and Śrīrāmastavarājastotram are successful in establishing the five ''Prasthāna''s in place of the three ''Prasthāna''s of Prasthānatrayī. Dr. Ram Chandra Prasad, author of bilingual English and Hindi commentaries on the Ramcharitmanas, says that the ''Mahavīrī'' commentary is "adorned with erudition" and considers it to be "the best exposition of Hanuman Chalisa."Prasad 1999, p. 849: श्रीहनुमानचालीसा की सर्वश्रेष्ठ व्याख्या के लिए देखें महावीरी व्याख्या, जिसके लेखक हैं प्रज्ञाचक्षु आचार्य श्रीरामभद्रदासजी। श्रीहनुमानचालीसा के प्रस्तुत भाष्य का आधार श्रीरामभद्रदासजी की ही वैदुष्यमंडित टीका है। इसके लिए मैं आचार्यप्रवर का ऋणी हूँ। [For the best explanation of Hanuman Chalisa, refer the ''Mahāvīrī'' commentary, whose author is the visually-disabled Acharya Rambhadradas. The base for the commentary being presented is the commentary by Rambhadradas, which is adorned with erudition. For this, I am grateful to the eminent Acharya.]

Other works

Kalika Prasad Shukla was one of the examiners of the PhD dissertation of Rambhadracharya (then known as Giridhar Mishra) in 1981. After examining his Sanskrit thesis titled ''Adhyātmarāmāyaṇe Apāṇinīyaprayogānāṃ Vimarśaḥ'' (''Deliberation on the non- Paninian usages in the Adhyatma Ramayana''), he wrote a Sanskrit verse–Nagar 2002, p. 84.

Kalanath Shastry also critiqued the work ''Bhṛṅgadūtam'', about which he says that it has many new usages (''Prayoga''s) not seen earlier in Sanskrit poetry. As per Shastry, new dimensions in Sanskrit literature are seen in the play ''Śrīrāghavābhyudayam'' where there are songs in the ''Gīti'' style, and Gītarāmāyaṇam which is an epic poem in the ''Gīti'' style of Gītagovindam by Jayadeva. Dikshit writes that ''Kubjāpatram'' is a revival of the letter-poem (''Patrakāvya'') genre in Sanskrit after 2000 years, and is the first work in Sanskrit literature whose lead character is disabled.

Dikshit is of the view that the eight ''Utprekṣā'' figures of speech in ''Śrīrāghavabhāvadarśanam'' have excelled the ''Utprekṣā'' style of the poet Karṇapūra, while the erudition and poetic skill displayed in ''Śrīsarayūlaharī'' makes the reader forget the ''Gaṅgālaharī'' of Paṇḍitarāja Jagannātha. He holds the work Arundhatī to be an eminent epic in Khariboli Hindi after the Kāmāyanī of Jaishankar Prasad. He observes that while Kāmāyanī goes from creation to optimism to pessimism and ends with indifference, Arundhatī is optimistic from beginning to end and establishes the virtues of Hinduism as enshrined in the Ramayana. About the lyrical Hindi works ''Rāghavagītaguñjana'' and ''Bhaktigītasudhā'', Dikshit says that the works are steeped in Bhakti Rasa and are reminiscent of the works of Tulsidas, Surdas and Mirabai. On ''Bhaktigītasudhā'', Shraddha Gupta writes that the work follows the Bhojpuri tradition where the sentimental and artistic aspects are both developed.Gupta, Shraddha. ''Bhaktigītasudhā – An appraisal''. In Nagar (2002), pp. 744–747.

Dikshit says that the nationalistic play ''Śrīrāghavābhyudayam'' establishes Rambhadracharya as a successful playwright at a young age. Dikshit praises the aesthetics of the work ''Śrīsītārāmakelikaumudī'' saying that it represents all the six ''Sampradāya''s of Indian literature (''Rīti'', ''Rasa'', ''Alaṅkāra'', ''Dhvani'', ''Vakrokti'' and ''Aucitya''), and that it is a unique work of Rambhadracharya when it comes to figures of speech. Dikshit says that this work places Rambhadracharya in the league of ''Ritikavya'' poets like Raskhan, Keshavdas, Ghananand and Padmakar; but observes the distinction that while the works of all these poets are primarily in the Śṛngāra Rasa, ''Śrīsītārāmakelikaumudī'' is a work which has Vātsalya Rasa as the primary emotion, which is augmented by Śṛngāra Rasa.

References

Works cited

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

External links

*

{{Jagadguru Rambhadracharya

Indian literature