The Info List - Pre-sectarian Buddhism

--- Advertisement ---

Pre-sectarian Buddhism,[1] also called early Buddhism,[2][3] the earliest Buddhism,[4][5] and original Buddhism,[6] is the Buddhism that existed before the various subsects of Buddhism
came into being.[web 1] Some of the contents and teachings of this pre-sectarian Buddhism
may be deduced from the earliest Buddhist texts, which by themselves are already sectarian.[quote 1][quote 2][note 1]


1 Name 2 Timespan 3 Earliest Buddhism
and the Śramaṇa
movement 4 Contents and teachings of earliest Buddhism

4.1 Methodology

4.1.1 Scholarly positions 4.1.2 Textual comparison 4.1.3 Resolving inconsistencies

4.2 Dhyana and insight 4.3 Core teachings

4.3.1 Death, rebirth and karma 4.3.2 Dhyāna 4.3.3 Insight and mindfulness 4.3.4 Soul 4.3.5 The Noble Eightfold Path 4.3.6 The Four Noble Truths 4.3.7 Satipatthana 4.3.8 Bodhipakkhiyādhammā

5 Schayer - Precanonical Buddhism

5.1 Methodology 5.2 Ideas and practices 5.3 Criticism

6 See also 7 Notes 8 Quotations 9 References 10 Sources

10.1 Printed sources 10.2 Web-sources

11 Further reading 12 External links

Name[edit] Various terms are being used to refer to the earliest period of Buddhism:

"Pre-sectarian Buddhism"[1] "Early Buddhism",[3][2] "The earliest Buddhism",[7] "Original Buddhism",[6][note 1] "The Buddhism
of the Buddha himself."[6][note 2] Precanonical Buddhism[8]

Some Japanese scholars refer to the subsequent period of the early Buddhist schools as sectarian Buddhism.[2][3] Timespan[edit] Pre-sectarian Buddhism
may refer to the earliest Buddhism, the ideas and practices of Gautama Buddha
Gautama Buddha
himself. It may also refer to early Buddhism
as existing until about one hundred years after the parinirvana of the Buddha[9] until the first documented split in the sangha.[9] Contrary to the claim of doctrinal stability, early Buddhism
was a dynamic movement.[10] Pre-sectarian Buddhism
may have included or incorporated other Śramaṇic schools of thought,[11][note 3] as well as Vedic and Jain ideas and practices.[12][13][14][15] The first documented split occurred, according to most scholars, between the second Buddhist council and the third Buddhist council.[16] The first post-schismatic groups are often stated to be the Sthavira nikāya and the Mahāsāṃghika.[note 4] Eventually, eighteen different schools came into existence.[17] The later Mahayana schools may have preserved ideas which were abandoned by the "orthodox" Theravada,[18] such as the Three Bodies doctrine, the idea of consciousness (vijñāna) as a continuum, and devotional elements such as the worship of saints.[8][19][note 5] Earliest Buddhism
and the Śramaṇa
movement[edit] See also: Early Buddhist schools
Early Buddhist schools
and History of Buddhism
History of Buddhism
in India

Siddartha Gautama
Siddartha Gautama
depicted in Greco-Buddhist style during his extreme fasting prior to be "Awakened", 2nd-3rd century, Gandhara
(modern eastern Afghanistan), Lahore Museum, Pakistan

Pre-sectarian Buddhism
was originally one of the śramaṇic movements.[20][21] The time of the Buddha was a time of urbanisation in India, and saw the growth of the śramaṇas, wandering philosophers that had rejected the authority of Vedas
and Brahmanic priesthood,[22] intent on escaping saṃsāra[20][23] through various means, which involved the study of natural laws, ascetic practices, and ethical behavior.[22] The śramaṇas gave rise to different religious and philosophical schools, among which pre-sectarian Buddhism
itself,[24][25] Yoga,[26] Jainism, Ājīvika, Ajñana and Cārvāka were the most important, and also to popular concepts in all major Indian religions
Indian religions
such as saṃsāra (endless cycle of birth and death) and moksha (liberation from that cycle).[27][note 6] Nevertheless, despite the success that these wandering philosophers and ascetics had obtained by spreading ideas and concepts that would soon be accepted by all religions of India, the orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy
Hindu philosophy
(āstika) opposed to śramaṇic schools of thought and refuted their doctrines as "heterodox" (nāstika), because they refused to accept the epistemic authority of Vedas, denied the existence of the soul and/or the existence of Ishvara
("Supreme God"). The ideas of saṃsāra, karma and rebirth show a development of thought in Indian religions: from the idea of single existence, at the end of which one was judged and punished and rewarded for one's deeds, or karma; to multiple existences with reward or punishment in an endless series of existences; and then attempts to gain release from this endless series.[28] This release was the central aim of the Śramaṇa
movement.[20] Vedic rituals, which aimed at entrance into heaven, may have played a role in this development: the realisation that those rituals did not lead to an everlasting liberation led to the search for other means.[20] Contents and teachings of earliest Buddhism[edit] Methodology[edit] Scholarly positions[edit] According to Schmithausen, three positions held by scholars of Buddhism
can be distinguished regarding the possibility to extract the earliest Buddhism:[29]

"Stress on the fundamental homogeneity and substantial authenticity of at least a considerable part of the Nikayic materials;"[note 7] "Scepticism with regard to the possibility of retrieving the doctrine of earliest Buddhism;"[note 8] "Cautious optimism in this respect."[note 9]

Textual comparison[edit] Information on the contents and teachings of the earliest Buddhism cannot be obtained from the existing Buddhist schools, nor from the early Buddhist schools, since they were sectarian from the outset.[1][quote 1] One method to obtain information on the oldest core of Buddhism
is to compare the oldest extant versions of the Theravadin Pāli Canon, the surviving portions of the scriptures of Sarvastivada, Mulasarvastivada, Mahīśāsaka, Dharmaguptaka
and other schools,[37][6] and the Chinese āgamas and other surviving portions of other early canons.[note 10][note 11] Early Mahayana
texts which contain nearly identical material to that of the Pali
Canon such as the Salistamba Sutra
Salistamba Sutra
are also further evidence.[38] The oldest recorded teachings are the texts of the four main nikayas of the Sutta Pitaka,[note 12] together with the main body of monastic rules, the Vinaya
Pitaka.[citation needed] Scholars have also claimed that there is a core within this core, referring to some poems and phrases which seem to be the oldest parts of the Sutta Pitaka.[39][note 13] Resolving inconsistencies[edit] The reliability of these sources, and the possibility to draw out a core of oldest teachings, is a matter of dispute.[12][40][41][33] According to Tillman Vetter, the comparison of the oldest extant texts "does not just simply lead to the oldest nucleus of the doctrine."[37] At best, it leads to

... a Sthavira canon dating from c. 270 B.C. when the missionary activities during Asoka's reign as well as dogmatic disputes had not yet created divisions within the Shtavira tradition.[37]

According to Vetter, inconsistencies remain, and other methods must be applied to resolve those inconsistencies.[37] Exemplary studies are the study on descriptions of "liberating insight" by Lambert Schmithausen,[42] the overview of early Buddhism
by Tilmann Vetter,[40] the philological work on the four truths by K.R. Norman,[43] the textual studies by Richard Gombrich,[33] and the research on early meditation methods by Johannes Bronkhorst.[44] Dhyana and insight[edit] A core problem in the study of early Buddhism
is the relation between dhyana and insight.[40][12][33] The Buddhist tradition has incorporated two traditions regarding the use of dhyana (jhana).[12] There is a tradition that stresses attaining insight (bodhi, prajñā, kensho) as the means to awakening and liberation. But it has also incorporated the yogic tradition, as reflected in the use of jhana, which is rejected in other sutras as not achieving the final result of liberation.[40][45][33] The problem was famously voiced in 1936 by Louis de La Vallee Poussin, in his text Musila et Narada: Le Chemin de Nirvana.[46][note 14] Schmithausen[note 15] notes that the mention of the four noble truths as constituting "liberating insight", which is attained after mastering the Rupa Jhanas, is a later addition to texts such as Majjhima Nikaya
Majjhima Nikaya
36.[42][12][40] Schmithausen discerns three possible roads to liberation as described in the suttas,[42] to which Vetter adds the sole practice of dhyana itself, which he sees as the original "liberating practice":[47]

The four Rupa Jhanas themselves constituted the core liberating practice of early buddhism, c.q. the Buddha;[48] Mastering the four Rupa Jhanas, whereafter "liberating insight" is attained; Mastering the four Rupa Jhanas and the four Arupa Jhanas, where-after "liberating insight" is attained; Liberating insight itself suffices.

This problem has been elaborated by several well-known scholars, including Tilman Vetter,[40] Johannes Bronkhorst,[12] and Richard Gombrich.[33] Core teachings[edit] The Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta[note 16] is regarded by the Buddhist tradition as the first talk of the Buddha.[49] Scholars have noted some persistent problems with this view.[50] Originally the text may only have pointed at "the middle way" as being the core of the Buddha's teaching,[49] which pointed to the practice of dhyana.[40] This basic term was extensified with descriptions of the eightfold path,[40] itself a condensation of a longer sequence.[51] Under pressure of developments in Indian religiosity, which began to see "liberating insight" as the essence of moksha,[52] the four noble truths were added, as a description of the Buddha's "liberating insight".[49] Death, rebirth and karma[edit] Main articles: Karma in Buddhism, Rebirth (Buddhism), and Saṃsāra (Buddhism) According to Vetter, the Buddha at first sought "the deathless" (amata/amrta), which is concerned with the here and now.[53] According to Edward Conze, Death was an error which could be overcome by those who entered the "doors to the Deathless", "the gates of the Undying."[54] According to Conze, the Buddha saw death as a sign that "something has gone wrong with us."[55] The Buddha saw death as brought on by an evil force, Mára, "the Killer,"[note 17] "who tempts us away from our true immortal selves and diverts us from the path which could lead us back to freedom."[55] Our cravings keep us tied to Mára’s realm. By releasing our attachments we move beyond his realm, and gain freedom from saṃsāra, the beginningless movement of death and rebirth.[55] Karma is the intentional (cetanā) actions which keep us tied to saṃsāra.[56] Two views on the liberation from saṃsāra can be discerned in the śramaṇic movements. Originally karma meant "physical and mental activity". One solution was to refrain from any physical or mental activity. The other solution was to see the real self as not participating in these actions, and to disidentify with those actions.[57] According to Bronkhorst, the Buddha rejected both approaches.[58] Nevertheless, these approaches can also be found in the Buddhist tradition, such as the four formless jhanas,[59] and disidentification from the constituents of the self.[60][note 18] Bruce Matthews notes that there is no cohesive presentation of karma in the Sutta Pitaka,[62] which may mean that the doctrine was incidental to the main perspective of early Buddhist soteriology.[62] Schmithausen is a notable scholar who has questioned whether karma already played a role in the theory of rebirth of earliest Buddhism.[63][64] According to Schmithausen, "the karma doctrine may have been incidental to early Buddhist soteriology."[65] According to Vetter, "the deathless" (amata/amrta) is concerned with the here and now. Only after this realization did he become acquainted with the doctrine of rebirth.[53] Bronkhorst disagrees, and concludes that the Buddha "introduced a concept of karma that differed considerably from the commonly held views of his time."[66] According to Bronkhorst, not physical and mental activities as such were seen as responsible for rebirth, but intentions and desire.[58] Dhyāna[edit] Main article: Buddhist meditation Both Schmithausen and Bronkhorst note that the attainment of insight and mindfulness, which is a cognitive activity, cannot be possible in a state wherein all cognitive activity has ceased.[12] According to Vetter and Bronkhorst, dhyāna itself constituted the original "liberating practice".[47][12][67] Vetter notes that "penetrating abstract truths and penetrating them successively does not seem possible in a state of mind which is without contemplation and reflection."[68] Vetter further argues that the eightfold path constitutes a body of practices which prepare one, and lead up to, the practice of dhyana.[69] According to Bronkhorst, dhyana was a Buddhist invention,[12] whereas Alexander Wynne argues that dhyana was incorporated from Brahmanical practices, in the Nikayas ascribed to Alara Kalama
Alara Kalama
and Uddaka Ramaputta. These practices were paired to mindfulness and insight, and given a new interpretation.[15] Kalupahana argues that the Buddha "reverted to the meditational practices" he had learned from Alara Kalama and Uddaka Ramaputta.[70] Norman notes that "the Buddha's way to release [...] was by means of meditative practices."[71] Gombrich also notes that a development took place in early Buddhism
resulting in a change in doctrine, which considered prajna to be an alternative means to "enlightenment".[72] According to Richard Gombrich, the sequence of the four rupa-jhanas describes two different cognitive states.[73][quote 8][74] Alexander Wynne further explains that the dhyana-scheme is poorly understood.[75] According to Wynne, words expressing the inculcation of awareness, such as sati, sampajāno, and upekkhā, are mistranslated or understood as particular factors of meditative states,[75] whereas they refer to a particular way of perceiving the sense objects.[75][note 19][note 20] Insight and mindfulness[edit] According to Johannes Bronkhorst,[12] Tillman Vetter,[40] and K.R. Norman,[71] bodhi was at first not specified. K. R. Norman:

It is not at all clear what gaining bodhi means. We are accustomed to the translation "enlightenment" for bodhi, but this is misleading [...] It is not clear what the buddha was awakened to, or at what particular point the awakening came.[71]

According to Norman, bodhi may basically have meant the knowledge that nibbana was attained,[77][78] due to the practice of dhyana.[71][40] Bronkhorst notes that the conception of what exactly this "liberating insight" was developed throughout time. Whereas originally it may not have been specified, later on the four truths served as such, to be superseded by pratityasamutpada, and still later, in the Hinayana schools, by the doctrine of the non-existence of a substantial self or person.[79] And Schmithausen notices that still other descriptions of this "liberating insight" exist in the Buddhist canon:

"that the five Skandhas are impermanent, disagreeable, and neither the Self nor belonging to oneself";[note 21] "the contemplation of the arising and disappearance (udayabbaya) of the five Skandhas";[note 22] "the realisation of the Skandhas as empty (rittaka), vain (tucchaka) and without any pith or substance (asaraka).[note 23][80]

Discriminating insight into transiency as a separate path to liberation was a later development.[81][72] This may have been to due an over-literal interpretation by later scholastics of the terminology used by the Buddha,[82] or to the problems involved with the practice of dhyana, and the need to develop an easier method.[83] According to Vetter it may not have been as effective as dhyana, and methods were developed to deepen the effects of discriminating insight.[83] It was also paired to dhyana, resulting in the well-known sila-samadhi-prajna scheme.[83] According to Vetter this kind of preparatory "dhyana" must have been different from the practice introduced by the Buddha, using kasina-exercises to produce a "more artificially produced dhyana", resulting in the cessation of apperceptions and feelings.[84] It also led to a different understanding of the eightfold path, since this path does not end with insight, but rather starts with insight. The path was no longer seen as a sequential development resulting in dhyana, but as a set of practices which had to be developed simultaneously to gain insight.[85] According to Alexander Wynne, the ultimate aim of dhyana was the attainment of insight,[86] and the application of the meditative state to the practice of mindfulness.[86] According to Frauwallner, mindfulness was a means to prevent the arising of craving, which resulted simply from contact between the senses and their objects. According to Frauwallner this may have been the Buddha’s original idea.[87] According to Wynne, this stress on mindfulness may have led to the intellectualism which favoured insight over the practice of dhyana.[75] Soul[edit] According to Bronkhorst, referring to Frauwallner, Schmithausen and Bhattacharya,

It is possible that original Buddhism
did not deny the existence of the soul.[88][note 24]

The Noble Eightfold Path[edit] According to Vetter, the description of the Buddhist path may initially have been as simple as the term "the middle way".[40] In time, this short description was elaborated, resulting in the description of the eightfold path.[40] Vetter and Bucknell both note that longer descriptions of "the path" can be found, which can be condensed into the Noble Eightfold Path.[40][51] One of those longer sequences, from the CulaHatthipadopama-sutta, the "Lesser Discourse on the Simile of the Elephant's Footprints", is as follows:[89]

Dhammalsaddhalpabbajja: A layman hears a Buddha teach the Dhamma, comes to have faith in him, and decides to take ordination as a monk; sila: He adopts the moral precepts; indriyasamvara: He practises "guarding the six sense-doors"; sati-sampajanna: He practises mindfulness and self-possession (actually described as mindfulness of the body, kdydnussati); jhana 1: He finds an isolated spot in which to meditate, purifies his mind of the hindrances (nwarana), and attains the first rupa-jhana; jhana 2: He attains the second jhana'; jhana 3: He attains the third jhana; jhana 4: He attains the fourth jhana; pubbenivasanussati-nana: he recollects his many former existences in samsara; sattanam cutupapata-nana: he observes the death and rebirth of beings according to their karmas; asavakkhaya-nana: He brings about the destruction of the asavas (inflow, mental bias),[90] and attains a profound realization of (as opposed to mere knowledge about) the four noble truths; vimutti: He perceives that he is now liberated, that he has done what was to be done.

The Four Noble Truths[edit] K.R. Norman concluded that the earliest version of the Dhamma-cakka-ppavattana sutra sutta did not contain the word "noble", but was added later.[43][note 25] Lambert Schmithausen concluded that the four truths were a later development in early Buddhism.[12] Carol Anderson, following Lambert Schmithausen and K.R. Norman, notes that the four truths are missing in critical passages in the canon,[94] and states:

... the four noble truths were probably not part of the earliest strata of what came to be recognized as Buddhism, but that they emerged as a central teaching in a slightly later period that still preceded the final redactions of the various Buddhist canons.[95]

The four truths probably entered the Sutta Pitaka
Sutta Pitaka
from the Vinaya, the rules for monastic order. They were first added to enlightenment-stories which contain the Four Jhanas, replacing terms for "liberating insight". From there they were added to the biographical stories of the Buddha:[50]

[I]t is more likely that the four truths are an addition to the biographies of the Buddha and to the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta.[96]

According to both Bronkhorst and Anderson, the four truths became a substitution for prajna, or "liberating insight", in the suttas[97][50] in those texts where "liberating insight" was preceded by the four jhanas.[98] According to Bronkhorst, the four truths may not have been formulated in earliest Buddhism, and did not serve in earliest Buddhism
as a description of "liberating insight".[99] Gotama's teachings may have been personal, "adjusted to the need of each person."[98] This replacement was probably caused by the influence and pressures of the wider Indian religious landscape, "which claimed that one can be released only by some truth or higher knowledge."[52] Satipatthana[edit] Main article: Satipatthana According to Grzegorz Polak, the four upassanā have been misunderstood by the developing Buddhist tradition, including Theravada, to refer to four different foundations. According to Polak, the four upassanā do not refer to four different foundations, but to the awareness of four different aspects of raising mindfulness:[100]

the six sense-bases which one needs to be aware of (kāyānupassanā); contemplation on vedanās, which arise with the contact between the senses and their objects (vedanānupassanā); the altered states of mind to which this practice leads (cittānupassanā); the development from the five hindrances to the seven factors of enlightenment (dhammānupassanā).

Bodhipakkhiyādhammā[edit] According to Warder the Bodhipakkhiyādhammā, the 37 factors of enlightenment, are a summary of the core Buddhist teachings which are common to all schools.[101][note 26] These factors are summarized in the Maha-parinibbana Sutta,[note 27] which recounts the Buddha's last days, in the Buddha's last address to his bikkhus:

Now, O bhikkhus, I say to you that these teachings of which I have direct knowledge and which I have made known to you — these you should thoroughly learn, cultivate, develop, and frequently practice, that the life of purity may be established and may long endure, for the welfare and happiness of the multitude, out of compassion for the world, for the benefit, well being, and happiness of gods and men. And what, bhikkhus, are these teachings? They are the four foundations of mindfulness, the four right efforts, the four constituents of psychic power, the five faculties, the five powers, the seven factors of enlightenment, and the Noble Eightfold Path. These, bhikkhus, are the teachings of which I have direct knowledge, which I have made known to you, and which you should thoroughly learn, cultivate, develop, and frequently practice.[web 2]

Alex Wayman has criticized A.K. Warder, for failing to present an integrated picture of early Buddhism.[102] But according to Gethin, the bodhi-pakkhiyadhamma provides a key to understanding the relationship between calm and insight in early Buddhist meditation theory, bringing together the practice of jhana with the development of wisdom.[103] Schayer - Precanonical Buddhism[edit] A separate stance has been taken by Stanislaw Schayer, a Polish scholar, who argued in the 1930s that the Nikayas preserve elements of an archaic form of Buddhism
which is close to Brahmanical beliefs,[8][19][104][105] and survived in the Mahayana tradition.[106][107] Contrary to popular opinion, the Theravada
and Mahayana
traditions may be "divergent, but equally reliable records of a pre-canonical Buddhism
which is now lost forever."[106] The Mahayana tradition may have preserved a very old, "pre-Canonical" tradition, which was largely, but not completely, left out of the Theravada-canon.[107] Methodology[edit] Schayer searched in the early texts for ideas that contradict the dominant doctrinal positions of the early canon. According to Schayer, these ideas have

... been transmitted by a tradition old enough and considered to be authoritative by the compilers of the Canon. The last conclusion follows of itself: these texts representing ideas and doctrines contradictory to the generally admitted canonical viewpoint are survivals of older, precanonical Buddhism.[108][note 28]

Edward Conze notes further:

They assume that wherever the Canon contains ideas which conflict with the orthodox theories of the Theravadins and Sarvastivadins, and wherever these ideas are taken up and developed by the Mahayana, we have to deal with a very old, "pre-Canonical" tradition, which was too venerable to be discarded by the compilers of the Canon.[107]

Ideas and practices[edit] Regamy has identified four points which are central to Schayer's reconstruction of precanonical Buddhism:[109]

The Buddha was considered as an extraordinary being, in whom ultimate reality was embodied, and who was an incarnation of the mythical figure of the tathagata; The Buddha's disciples were attracted to his spiritual charisma and supernatural authority; Nirvana
was conceived as the attainment of immortality, and the gaining of a deathless sphere from which there would be no falling back. This nirvana, as a transmundane reality or state, is incarnated in the person of the Buddha; Nirvana
can be reached because it already dwells as the inmost "consciousness" of the human being. It is a consciousness which is not subject to birth and death.

Accordin to Ray, Schayer has shown a second doctrinal position alongside that of the more dominant tradition, one likely to be of at least equivalent, if not of greater, antiquity.[110] Schayer's methodology has been used by M. Falk.[110][note 29] Falk details the precanonical Buddhist conceptions of the cosmos, nirvana, the Buddha, the path, and the saint. According to Falk, in the precanonical tradition, there is a threefold division of reality:[110]

The rupadhatu, the samsaric sphere of name and form (namarupa), in which ordinary beings live, die, and are reborn. The arupadhatu, the sphere of "sheer nama," produced by samadhi, an ethereal realm frequented by yogins who are not completely liberated; "Above" or "outside" these two realms is the realm of nirvana, the "amrta sphere," characterized by prajna. This nirvana is an "abode" or "place" which is gained by the enlightened holy man.[note 30]

According to Falk, this scheme is reflected in the precanonical conception of the path to liberation.[112] The nirvanic element, as an "essence" or pure consciousness, is immanent within samsara. The three bodies are concentric realities, which are stripped away or abandoned, leaving only the nirodhakaya of the liberated person.[112] Wynne notes that this pure consciousness was the central element in precanonical Buddhism:

Schayer referred to passages in which "consciousness" (vinnana) seems to be the ultimate reality or substratum (e.g. A I.10) 14 as well as the Saddhatu Sutra, which is not found in any canonical source but is cited in other Buddhist texts
Buddhist texts
— it states that the personality (pudgala) consists of the six elements (dhatu) of earth, water, fire, wind, space and consciousness; Schayer noted that it related to other ancient Indian ideas. Keith’s argument is also based on the Saddhatu Sutra
as well as "passages where we have explanations of Nirvana
which echo the ideas of the Upanishads regarding the ultimate reality." He also refers to the doctrine of "a consciousness, originally pure, defiled by adventitious impurities."[113]

Conze mentions ideas like the "person" (pudgala), the assumption of an eternal "consciousness" in the saddhatusutra, the identification of the Absolute, of Nirvana, with an "invisible infinite consciousness, which shines everywhere" in Dighanikdya XI 85, and "traces of a belief in consciousness as the nonimpermanent centre of the personality which constitutes an absolute element in this contingent world."[107] According to Lindtner, in precanonical Buddhism

... a place one can actually go to. It is called nirvanadhatu, has no border-signs (animitta), is localized somewhere beyond the other six dhatus (beginning with earth and ending with vijñana) but is closest to akasa and vijñana. One cannot visualize it, it is anidarsana, but it provides one with firm ground under one’s feet, it is dhruva; once there one will not slip back, it is acyutapada. As opposed to this world, it is a pleasant place to be in, it is sukha, things work well.[8][note 31]

According to Lindtner, Canonical Buddhism
was a reaction to this view, but also against the absolutist tendencies in Jainism
and the Upanisads. Nirvana
came to be seen as a state of mind, instead of a concrete place.[8] Elements of this precanonical Buddhism
may have survived the canonisation, and its subsequent filtering out of ideas, and re-appeared in Mahayana
Buddhism.[8][104] According to Lindtner, the existence of multiple, and contradicting ideas, is also reflected in the works of Nagarjuna, who tried to harmonize these different ideas. According to Lindtner, this lead him to taking a "paradoxical" stance, for instance regarding nirvana, rejecting any positive description.[8] Criticism[edit] According to Conze, Schayer's approach and results are "merely a tentative hypothesis".[114] Conze notes that it is also possible that these ideas later entered Buddhism, as a concession to "popular demand, just as the lower goal of birth in heaven (svarga) was admitted side by side with Nirvana."[114] According to Conze, the real issue is:

Did Buddhism
originate among an elite of intellectuals, of philosophical ascetics, and then become a popular religion only at the time of Asoka? Or was it, even from the earliest times onwards, a popular religion based on the cult of the Bhagavan, of the Lord Buddha? And if so, was this religious side a part of its very essence, or just as propagandistic concession to laymen?[114]

See also[edit]

Atthakavagga and Parayanavagga Buddhist Paths to liberation Basic Points Unifying the Theravāda and the Mahāyāna Buddhist councils History of Buddhism Outline of Buddhism


^ a b A.K Warder: "...a reconstruction of the original Buddhism presupposed by the traditions of the different schools known to us."[6] ^ This kernel of doctrine is presumably common Buddhism
of the period "before the schisms of the fourth and third centuries BC. It may be substantially the Buddhism
of the Buddha himself."[6] ^ See also Atthakavagga and Parayanavagga#Interpretation as heterodox ^ Collin Cox: "Virtually all later sources agree that the first schism within the early Buddhist community occurred with the separation of the Mahasamghika school, or "those of the great community," from the remaining monks referred to as Sthaviras, or the "elders."".[16] ^ See also Atthakavagga and Parayanavagga ^ Flood & Olivelle: "The second half of the first millennium BCE was the period that created many of the ideological and institutional elements that characterize later Indian religions. The renouncer tradition played a central role during this formative period of Indian religious history [...] Some of the fundamental values and beliefs that we generally associate with Indian religions
Indian religions
in general and Hinduism in particular were in part the creation of the renouncer tradition. These include the two pillars of Indian theologies: samsara - the belief that life in this world is one of suffering and subject to repeated deaths and births (rebirth); moksa/nirvana - the goal of human existence."[27] ^ Well-known proponents of the first position are A.K. Warder[quote 3] and Richard Gombrich.[32][quote 4] ^ A proponent of the second position is Ronald Davidson.[quote 5] ^ Well-known proponent of the third position are J.W. de Jong,[5][quote 2] Johannes Bronkhorst[quote 6] and Donald Lopez.[quote 7] ^ Warder: "When we examine the Tripitakas of the eighteen schools, so far as they are extant, we find an agreement which is substantial, though not complete. Even the most conservative of the early schools seem to have added new texts to their collections. However, there is a central body of sutras (dialogues), in four groups, which is so similar in all known versions that we must accept these as so many recensions of the same original texts. These make up the greater part of the Sutra
Pitaka."[17] ^ Most of these non-Indian texts are only available in a Chinese translation, with the exception of some individual scriptures found in Nepal, which are composed in Sanskrit.[6] The Gandhāran Buddhist texts were recovered from Afghanistan. The central body of sutras in these texts is so similar that they are considered to be different recensions of the same text.[6] ^ The Digha Nikaya, Majjhima Nikaya, Samyutta Nikaya
Samyutta Nikaya
and Anguttara Nikaya ^ Nakamura: "It has been made clear that some poem (Gāthā) portions and some phrases represent earlier layers [...] Based upon these portions of the scriptures we can construe aspects of original Buddhism
[...] Buddhism
as appears in earlier portions of the scriptures is fairly different from what is explained by many scholars as earlier Buddhism
or primitive Buddhism.[39] ^ See Louis de La Vallée Poussin, Musial and Narad. Translated from the French by Gelongma Migme Chödrön and Gelong Lodrö Sangpo. ^ In his often-cited article On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism ^ Sammyuta Nikaya 56:11 ^ "Mara" is deeply rooted in Indo-European mythology. See also Mare (folklore) ^ According to Bronkhorst, the Buddha's approach was a psychological one. He explains the incorporation of "inactivity asceticism" as effected by followers of the Buddha who misunderstood the Buddha's understanding of karma. Bronkhorst himself asks the question where this different view of karma came from, and speculates that the Buddha may have inherited it from his parents, or "modified his views in this respect in the light of the experiences that led to, or constituted, his liberation."[61] ^ Wynne: "Thus the expression sato sampajāno in the third jhāna must denote a state of awareness different from the meditative absorption of the second jhāna (cetaso ekodibhāva). It suggests that the subject is doing something different from remaining in a meditative state, i.e., that he has come out of his absorption and is now once again aware of objects. The same is true of the word upek(k)hā: it does not denote an abstract 'equanimity', [but] it means to be aware of something and indifferent to it [...] The third and fourth jhāna-s, as it seems to me, describe the process of directing states of meditative absorption towards the mindful awareness of objects.[76] ^ According to Gombrich, "the later tradition has falsified the jhana by classifying them as the quintessence of the concentrated, calming kind of meditation, ignoring the other - and indeed higher - element.[73] ^ Majjhima Nikaya
Majjhima Nikaya
26 ^ Anguttara Nikaya
Anguttara Nikaya
II.45 (PTS) ^ Samyutta Nikaya
Samyutta Nikaya
III.140-142 (PTS) ^ Bronkhorst: "(Frauwallner 1953: 217-53; Schmithausen 1969: 160-61; Bhattacharya, 1973)."[88] See also Bronkhorst (2009), Buddhist Teaching in India, p.22 ff. ^ See also:

Anderson (1999):[91] "The appearance of the four noble truths in the introduction, enlightenment, and gerundival sets in the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta provide evidence for Norman's correct conclusion that the teaching was probably not part of the earliest version of the Sutta.[92] Batchelor (2012): "In a 1992 paper entitled "The Four Noble Truths," Norman offers a detailed, philological analysis of The First Discourse, and arrives at the startling conclusion that "the earliest form of this sutta did not include the word ariya-saccaؐ (noble truth)" (Norman 2003: 223). On grammatical and syntactical grounds, he shows how the expression "noble truth" was inexpertly interpolated into the text at a later date than its original composition. But since no such original text has come down to us, we cannot know what it did say. All that can reasonably be deduced is that instead of talking of four noble truths, the text merely spoke of "four.""[93]

^ In his 1970 publication Indian Buddhism, which predates the discoveries of Norman, Schmithausen, Vetter, Bronkhorst and Gombrich. ^ DN 10 ^ quote from Schayer 1935, p.124 ^ M. Falk (1943, Nama-rupa and Dharma-rupa ^ See Digha Nikaya
Digha Nikaya
15, Mahanidana Sutta, which describes a nine-fold chain of causation. Mind-and-body (nama-rupa) and consciousness (vijnana) do condition here each other (verse 2 & 3). In verse 21 and 22, it is stated that consciousness comes into the mother's womb, and finds a resting place in mind-and-body. [111] ^ Cited in Wynne (2007) p.99.[113]


^ a b Leon Hurvitz: "... stressed that the written canon in Buddhism is sectarian from the outset, and that presectarian Buddhism
must be deduced from the writings as they now exist."[1](quote via Google Scholar search-engine) ^ a b J.W. De Jong: "It would be hypocritical to assert that nothing can be said about the doctrine of earliest Buddhism
[...] the basic ideas of Buddhism
found in the canonical writings could very well have been proclaimed by him [the Buddha], transmitted and developed by his disciples and, finally, codified in fixed formulas."[5] ^ According to A.K. Warder, in his 1970 publication "Indian Buddhism", from the oldest extant texts a common kernel can be drawn out.[30] According to Warder, c.q. his publisher: "This kernel of doctrine is presumably common Buddhism
of the period before th great schisms of the fourth and third centuries BC. It may be substantially the Buddhism
of the Buddha himself, although this cannot be proved: at any rate it is a Buddhism
presupposed by the schools as existing about a hundred years after the parinirvana of the Buddha, and there is no evidence to suggest that it was formulated by anyone else than the Buddha and his immediate followers."[31] ^ Richard Gombrich: "I have the greatest difficulty in accepting that the main edifice is not the work of a single genius. By "the main edifice" I mean the collections of the main body of sermons, the four Nikāyas, and of the main body of monastic rules."[33] ^ Ronald Davidson: "While most scholars agree that there was a rough body of sacred literature (disputed)(sic) that a relatively early community (disputed)(sic) maintained and transmitted, we have little confidence that much, if any, of surviving Buddhist scripture is actually the word of the historic Buddha."[34] ^ Bronkhorst: "This position is to be preferred to (ii) for purely methodological reasons: only those who seek nay find, even if no success is guaranteed."[35] ^ Lopez: "The original teachings of the historical Buddha are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to recover or reconstruct."[36] ^ Gombrich: "I know this is controversial, but it seems to me that the third and fourth jhanas are thus quite unlike the second."[73]


^ a b c d Hurvitz 1976. ^ a b c Nakamura 1989. ^ a b c Hirakawa 1990. ^ Gombrich 1997, p. 11-12. ^ a b c Jong 1993, p. 25. ^ a b c d e f g h Warder 1999. ^ Gombrich 1997, p. 11 -12. ^ a b c d e f g Lindtner 1997. ^ a b Mun-keat 2000, p. ix. ^ Warder 2000, p. 262. ^ Vetter 1988, p. 101-106. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Bronkhorst 1993. ^ Lindter 1997. ^ Lindter 1999. ^ a b Wynne 2007. ^ a b Cox 2004, p. 502. ^ a b Warder 1999, p. 5. ^ Potter 1996, p. 31-32. ^ a b Lindtner 1999. ^ a b c d Samuel 2010. ^ Nilakanta Sastri 1988, p. 300. ^ a b Warder 2004, p. 32-33. ^ Norman 1997, p. 28. ^ Warder 2004, p. 35. ^ Svarghese 2008, p. 259-260. ^ Samuel 2008, p. 8. ^ a b Flood 2003, p. 273-274. ^ Norman 1997, p. 28-29. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. vii. ^ Warder 1999, p. 0. ^ Warder & 1999, p. inside flap. ^ Bronkhorst 1997, p. viii. ^ a b c d e f Gombrich 1997. ^ Davidson 2003, p. 147. ^ Bronkhorst 1997, p. vii. ^ Lopez 1995, p. 4. ^ a b c d Vetter 1988, p. ix. ^ Potter, Karl H. Abhidharma
to 150 A.D. page 32. ^ a b Nakamura 1989, p. 57. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Vetter 1988. ^ Schmithausen 1990. ^ a b c Schmithausen 1981. ^ a b Norman 1992. ^ Bronkhorst 1997. ^ bronkhorst 1993. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 133-134. ^ a b Vetter 1988, p. xxi-xxii. ^ Vetter, 1988 & xxi-xxxvii. ^ a b c Vetter 1988, p. xxviii. ^ a b c Anderson 1999. ^ a b Bucknell 1984. ^ a b Vetter 1988, p. xxxiii. ^ a b Bronkhorst 1998, p. 3. ^ Conze 2008, p. vi. ^ a b c Conze 2008, p. viii. ^ Bronkhorst 1998. ^ Bronkhorst 1998, p. 13-14. ^ a b Bronkhorst 1998, p. 14. ^ bronkhorst 1998, p. 14-15. ^ bronkhorst 1998, p. 15. ^ bronkhorst 1998, p. 16. ^ a b Matthews 1986, p. 124. ^ Schmithausen 1986. ^ Bronkhorst 1998, p. 13. ^ Schmithausen 1986, p. 206-207. ^ Bronkhorst 1998, p. 16. ^ Cousins 1996, p. 58. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxvii. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxx. ^ Kalupahana 1994, p. 24. ^ a b c d Norman 1997, p. 29. ^ a b Gombrich 1997, p. 131. ^ a b c Wynne 2007, p. 140, note 58. ^ Original publication: Gombrich, Richard (2007), Religious Experience in Early Buddhism, OCHS Library  ^ a b c d Wynne 2007, p. 106. ^ Wynne 2007, p. 106-107. ^ Norman 1997, p. 30. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxix, xxxi. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 100-101. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 101. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxxiv-xxxvii. ^ Gombrich 1997, p. 96-134. ^ a b c Vetter 1988, p. xxxv. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxxvi. ^ Vetter 1988, p. xxxvi-xxxvii. ^ a b Wynne 2007, p. 105. ^ Williams 2000, p. 45. ^ a b Bronkhorst 1993, p. 99. ^ Bucknell 1984, p. 11-12. ^ Carr & Mahalingam 1997, p. 948. ^ Anderson, 1999 & 17-20. ^ Anderson, 1999 & 20. ^ Batchelor 2012, p. 92. ^ Anderson 1999, p. viii. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 21. ^ Anderson 1999, p. 17. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 99-100, 102-111. ^ a b Bronkhorst 1993, p. 108. ^ Bronkhorst 1993, p. 107. ^ Polak 2011. ^ Warder 1999, p. 82. ^ Gethin 2001, p. 343. ^ Gethin 2001, p. xiii. ^ a b Akizuki 1990, p. 25-27. ^ Ray 1999. ^ a b Reat 1998, p. xi. ^ a b c d Conze 1967, p. 10. ^ Ray 1999, p. 374. ^ Ray 1999, p. 374-377. ^ a b c Ray 1999, p. 375. ^ Walshe 1995, p. 223, 226. ^ a b Ray, p. 375. ^ a b Wynne 2007, p. 99. ^ a b c Conze 1967, p. 11.

Sources[edit] Printed sources[edit]

Akizuki, Ryōmin (1990), New Mahāyāna: Buddhism
for a Post-modern World, Jain Publishing Company  Anderson, Carol (1999), Pain and Its Ending: The Four Noble Truths
Four Noble Truths
in the Theravada
Buddhist Canon, Routledge  Batchelor, Stephen (2012), "A Secular Buddhism", Journal of Global Buddhism, 13: 87–107  Bronkhorst, Johannes (1993), The Two Traditions Of Meditation In Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass Publ.  Bronkhorst, Johannes (1998), "Did the Buddha Believe in Karma and Rebirth?", Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 21 (1)  Bucknell, Rod (1984), "The Buddhist to Liberation: An Analysis of the Listing of Stages", The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 7 (2)  Buswell, Robert E. (2004), Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Macmillan  Carr, Brian; Mahalingam, Indira (1997), Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy, London; New York: Routledge, ISBN 0-415-03535-X  Conze, Edward (1967), Thirty years of Buddhis Studies. Selected essays by Edward Conze (PDF), Bruno Cassirer  Conze, Edward (2008), Buddhism. A Short History, Oneworld  Cousins, L. S. (1996), "The dating of the historical Buddha: a review article", Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, Third Series, 6 (1): 57–63  Cox, Collett (2004), Mainstream Buddhist Schools. In: Buswell (ed.), "MacMillan Encyclopedia of Buddhism", Macmillan  Davidson, Ronald M. (2003), Indian Esoteric Buddhism, Columbia University Press, ISBN 0-231-12618-2  Flood, Gavin; Olivelle, Patrick (2003), The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism, Blackwell  Gethin, R.M.L. (2001), The Buddhist Path to Awakening, Oneworld Publications  Gombrich, Richard F. (1997), How Buddhism
Began, Munshiram Manoharlal  Harrison, Paul (2004), Mahasamghika School. In: Buswell (ed.), "MacMillan Encyclopedia of Buddhism", Macmillan  Hirakawa (1990), History of Indian Buddhism, volume 1, Hawai'i University Press  Hurvitz, Leon (1976), Scripture of the Lotus Blossom of the Fine Dharma, Columbia University Press  Jong, J.W. de (1993), "The Beginnings of Buddhism", The Eastern Buddhist, 26 (2)  Kalupahana, David J. (1994), A history of Buddhist philosophy, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited  Lindtner, Christian (1997), "The Problem of Precanonical Buddhism", Buddhist Studies Review, 14: 2  Lindtner, Christian (1999), "From Brahmanism
to Buddhism", Asian Philosophy, 9 (1)  Lopez, Donald S. (1995), Buddhism
in Practice (PDF), Princeton University Press  Matthews, Bruce (1986), Post-Classical Developments In The Concepts of Karma and Rebirth in Theravada
Buddhism. In: Ronald W. Neufeldt (ed.), "Karma and rebirth: Post-classical developments", SUNY  Mun-keat, Choong (2000), The Fundamental Teachings of Early Buddhism. A comparative study based on the Sutranga portion of the Pali Sarpyutta-Nikaya and the Chinese Sarpyuktagama, Harrassowitz Verlag  Nakamura (1989), Indian Buddhism, Motilal Banarsidass  Nilakanta Sastri, K. A. (1988), Age of the Nandas and Mauryas, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 81-208-0466-X  Norman, K.R. (1992), The Four Noble Truths. In: "Collected Papers", vol 2:210-223, Pali
Text Society, 2003  Norman, K.R. (1997), A Philological Approach to Buddhism. The Bukkyo Dendo Kybkai Lectures 1994 (PDF), School ofOriental and African Studies (University of London)  Polak, Grzegorz (2011), Reexamining Jhana: Towards a Critical Reconstruction of Early Buddhist Soteriology, UMCS  Potter, Karl H. (1996), Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies Part VII: Abhidharma
to 150 A.D., Motilall Banarsidass  Ray, Reginald (1999), Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations, Oxford University Press  Reat, N. Ross (1998), The Salistamba Sutra, Motilal Banarsidass  Schmithausen, Lambert (1981), On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism". In: Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus (Gedenkschrift für Ludwig Alsdorf), hrsg. von Klaus Bruhn und Albrecht Wezler, Wiesbaden 1981, 199-250  Schmithausen, Lambert (1986), Critical Response. In: Ronald W. Neufeldt (ed.), "Karma and rebirth: Post-classical developments", SUNY  Svarghese, Alexander P. (2008), India : History, Religion, Vision And Contribution To The World  Vetter, Tilmann (1988), The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism, BRILL  Walsh, Maurice (1995), The Long Discourses of the Buddha. A Translation of the Digha Nikaya, Wisdom Publications  Warder, A.K. (2004), Indian Buddhism, 3rd Revised edition, Motilal Banarsidass Publ.  Wynne, Alexander (2007), The Origin of Buddhist Meditation, Routledge 


^ Bhikkhu
Sujato, Sects & Sectarianism. The origins of Buddhist Schools. Conclusion ^ Sister Vajira & Francis Story (trans.)(1998), "Maha-parinibbana Sutta: Last Days of the Buddha" (DN 10)

Further reading[edit]

History of Buddhism
History of Buddhism

Bronkhorst, Johannes (1993), The Two Traditions Of Meditation In Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass Publ.  Gombrich, Richard F. (1997), How Buddhism
Began, Munshiram Manoharlal  Norman, K.R. (1997), A Philological Approach to Buddhism. The Bukkyo Dendo Kyokai Lectures 1994 (PDF), School ofOriental and African Studies (University of London)  Samuel, Geoffrey (2010), The Origins of Yoga
and Tantra. Indic Religions to the Thirteenth Century, Cambridge University Press 

Early Buddhism

Schmithausen, Lambert (1981), On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism". In: Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus (Gedenkschrift für Ludwig Alsdorf), hrsg. von Klaus Bruhn und Albrecht Wezler, Wiesbaden 1981, 199-250  Vetter, Tilmann (1988), The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism, BRILL  Wynne, Alexander (2007), The Origin of Buddhist Meditation, Routledge 

Modern understanding

External links[edit]

A handful of Leaves Essential publications on Buddhist history Louis de La Vallée Poussin, Musial and Narad. Translated from the French by Gelongma Migme Chödrön and Gelong Lodrö Sangpo. Ven. Sujato (2006), Sects & Sectarianism: The origins of Buddhist Schools

v t e


Glossary Index Outline


Three Jewels

Buddha Dharma Sangha

Four Noble Truths Noble Eightfold Path Nirvana Middle Way

The Buddha

Tathāgata Birthday Four sights Physical characteristics Footprint Relics Iconography in Laos and Thailand Films Miracles Family

Suddhodāna (father) Māyā (mother) Mahapajapati Gotamī (aunt, adoptive mother) Yasodhara (wife) Rāhula
(son) Ānanda (cousin) Devadatta

Places where the Buddha stayed Buddha in world religions

Key concepts

Avidyā (Ignorance) Bardo Bodhicitta Bodhisattva Buddha-nature Dhamma theory Dharma Enlightenment Five hindrances Indriya Karma Kleshas Mind Stream Parinirvana Pratītyasamutpāda Rebirth Saṃsāra Saṅkhāra Skandha Śūnyatā Taṇhā
(Craving) Tathātā Ten Fetters Three marks of existence

Impermanence Dukkha Anatta

Two truths doctrine


Ten spiritual realms Six realms

Deva (Buddhism) Human realm Asura realm Hungry Ghost realm Animal realm Hell

Three planes of existence


Bhavana Bodhipakkhiyādhammā Brahmavihara

Mettā Karuṇā Mudita Upekkha

Buddhābhiseka Dāna Devotion Dhyāna Faith Five Strengths Iddhipada Meditation

Mantras Kammaṭṭhāna Recollection Smarana Anapanasati Samatha Vipassanā
( Vipassana
movement) Shikantaza Zazen Kōan Mandala Tonglen Tantra Tertön Terma

Merit Mindfulness


Nekkhamma Pāramitā Paritta Puja

Offerings Prostration Chanting

Refuge Satya


Seven Factors of Enlightenment

Sati Dhamma vicaya Pīti Passaddhi


Five Precepts Bodhisattva
vow Prātimokṣa

Threefold Training

Śīla Samadhi Prajñā


Four Right Exertions


Bodhi Bodhisattva Buddhahood Pratyekabuddha Four stages of enlightenment

Sotāpanna Sakadagami Anāgāmi Arhat


Bhikkhu Bhikkhuni Śrāmaṇera Śrāmaṇerī Anagarika Ajahn Sayadaw Zen
master Rōshi Lama Rinpoche Geshe Tulku Householder Upāsaka and Upāsikā Śrāvaka

The ten principal disciples

Shaolin Monastery

Major figures

Gautama Buddha Kaundinya Assaji Sāriputta Mahamoggallāna Mulian Ānanda Mahākassapa Anuruddha Mahākaccana Nanda Subhuti Punna Upali Mahapajapati Gotamī Khema Uppalavanna Asita Channa Yasa Buddhaghoṣa Nagasena Angulimala Bodhidharma Nagarjuna Asanga Vasubandhu Atiśa Padmasambhava Nichiren Songtsen Gampo Emperor Wen of Sui Dalai Lama Panchen Lama Karmapa Shamarpa Naropa Xuanzang Zhiyi


Tripiṭaka Madhyamakālaṃkāra Mahayana
sutras Pāli Canon Chinese Buddhist canon Tibetan Buddhist canon


Theravada Mahayana

Chan Buddhism

Zen Seon Thiền

Pure Land Tiantai Nichiren Madhyamaka Yogachara

Navayana Vajrayana

Tibetan Shingon Dzogchen

Early Buddhist schools Pre-sectarian Buddhism Basic points unifying Theravāda and Mahāyāna


Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan Cambodia China India Indonesia Japan Korea Laos Malaysia Maldives Mongolia Myanmar Nepal Pakistan Philippines Russia

Kalmykia Buryatia

Singapore Sri Lanka Taiwan Thailand Tibet Vietnam Middle East


Western countries

Argentina Australia Brazil France United Kingdom United States Venezuela


Timeline Ashoka Buddhist councils History of Buddhism
History of Buddhism
in India

Decline of Buddhism
in India

Great Anti-Buddhist Persecution Greco-Buddhism Buddhism
and the Roman world Buddhism
in the West Silk Road transmission of Buddhism Persecution of Buddhists Banishment of Buddhist monks from Nepal Buddhist crisis Sinhalese Buddhist nationalism Buddhist modernism Vipassana
movement 969 Movement Women in Buddhism


Abhidharma Atomism Buddhology Creator Economics Eight Consciousnesses Engaged Buddhism Eschatology Ethics Evolution Humanism Logic Reality Secular Buddhism Socialism The unanswered questions



Temple Vihara Wat Stupa Pagoda Candi Dzong architecture Japanese Buddhist architecture Korean Buddhist temples Thai temple art and architecture Tibetan Buddhist architecture



Tree Budai Buddharupa Calendar Cuisine Funeral Holidays

Vesak Uposatha Magha Puja Asalha Puja Vassa

Jaya Sri Maha Bodhi Kasaya Mahabodhi Temple Mantra

Om mani padme hum

Mudra Music Pilgrimage

Lumbini Maya Devi Temple Bodh Gaya Sarnath Kushinagar

Poetry Prayer beads Prayer wheel Symbolism

Dharmachakra Flag Bhavacakra Swastika Thangka

Temple of the Tooth Vegetarianism


Abhijñā Amitābha Avalokiteśvara


Brahmā Dhammapada Dharma
talk Hinayana Kalpa Koliya Lineage Maitreya Māra Ṛddhi Sacred languages

Pali Sanskrit

Siddhi Sutra Vinaya


Bahá'í Faith Christianity

Influences Comparison

East Asian religions Gnosticism Hinduism Jainism Judaism Psychology Science Theosophy Violence Western philosophy


Bodhisattvas Books Buddhas


Buddhists Suttas Temples