HOME
The Info List - Multi-speed Europe


--- Advertisement ---



Council of the EU Presidency

Configurations

General Foreign Justice and Home Economic

Euro

Legislative procedure Voting Secretariat

Secretary-General

Uwe Corsepius

Directorates-general COREPER

Judiciary

Court of Justice

Members Rulings

General Court

Central Bank

President Draghi

ESCB Euro EMU Eurozone

Court of Auditors

Budget OLAF

Other bodies

Agencies Investment Bank CoR EESC Ombudsman National parliaments

Policies and issues

Foreign relations

High Representative

Federica Mogherini

Ext. Action Service Foreign Policy Defence Policy Customs Union Enlargement

Budget Four Freedoms

Economic Area Area of FS&J Schengen Area

Policies

Agricultural Energy Fisheries Regional

Citizenship

Identity Pro-Europeanism Euroscepticism

Integration

Supranationalism Federalism United States of Europe Multi-speed Opt-outs Enhanced co-op Withdrawal

Elections

1979, 1984, 1989 1994, 1999, 2004, 2009 2014 (last election) Political parties Constituencies

Referendums

Law

Treaty on European Union Acquis

Primacy Subsidiarity

Treaties

Rome Single European Act Maastricht Amsterdam Nice Lisbon

Article 50

Fundamental Rights Membership Treaties of Accession

1972, 1979, 1985, 1994, 2003, 2005, 2011

European Council

President Tusk (EPP)

Parties List of meetings

Other countries Atlas

v t e

Multi-speed Europe
Multi-speed Europe
or two-speed Europe (called also "variable geometry Europe" or "Core Europe" depending on the form it would take in practice) is the idea that different parts of the European Union should integrate at different levels and pace depending on the political situation in each individual country. Indeed, multi-speed Europe is currently a reality, with only a subset of EU countries being members of the eurozone and of the Schengen area. Like other forms of differentiated integration such as à la carte and variable geometry, "multi-speed Europe" arguably aims to salvage the "widening and deepening of the European Union" in the face of political opposition.

Contents

1 Reasons and actuality of the concept 2 Overview of non-uniformity inside the EU 3 Participation of European countries in non EU-only integration initiatives 4 Post-Brexit-vote revival of "multispeed Europe" ideas 5 See also 6 References 7 External links

Reasons and actuality of the concept[edit] The concept entered political discourse when, after the end of the Cold War, an eastward enlargement of the European Union
European Union
began to materialise and the question arose how "widening" could be made compatible with "deepening",[1] i.e., how the imminent enlargement process could be prevented from diluting the idea of an "ever closer union among the peoples of Europe", as the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community
European Economic Community
of 1957 had put it. In 1994 – still at a time of the EU12 – the German Christian Democrats Wolfgang Schäuble and Karl Lamers published a document[2] in which they called for a Kerneuropa
Kerneuropa
(= core Europe). This idea envisaged that "core Europe" would have a "centripetal effect", a magnetic attraction for the rest of Europe. A precursor to that concept had been a proposal by two advisors to German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, Michael Mertes
Michael Mertes
and Norbert J. Prill, published as early as July 1989. Mertes and Prill called for a concentric circles Europe, built around a federal core consisting of the EU6 and like-minded EU member states.[3] In 1994 they partly revoked their original idea, arguing that the post-Cold War EU would rather look like a "Europe of Olympic rings" than a "Europe of concentric circles".[4] The multi-speed Europe concept has been debated for years in European political circles, as a way to solve some institutional issues. The concept is that the more members there are in the Union, the more difficult it becomes to reach consensus on various topics, and the less likely it is that all would advance at the same pace in various fields.

Inner Six
Inner Six
and Outer Seven.

Intermediate forms could be limited to some areas of close cooperation, as some historical examples are given below. It is also possible now for a minimum of nine EU member states to use enhanced co-operation, but this new framework has been used only once. A second proposal, a unified European patent, is nearing completion [as of December 2010] with only two countries ( Italy
Italy
and Spain) not participating.[5] The idea of a multi-speed Europe has been revived because of the following initiatives:

the Euro
Euro
with 19 EU member-states and one more in ERM II. All but two states (Denmark, United Kingdom) have agreed by treaty to join but at least one of those treaty signatories (Sweden) has made no further steps to do so. the Schengen area
Schengen area
Treaty leading to a common border for many EU states (it currently excludes Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Ireland, Romania
Romania
and the United Kingdom) but which includes four non-EU members - Norway, Switzerland, Iceland
Iceland
and Liechtenstein. It is often asserted that Ireland only reluctantly agreed to stay out of the treaty to avoid creating a physical border between the Republic and Northern Ireland because the UK had refused to sign.[6] other initiatives limited to some states, such as the European Defence initiative and Prüm Convention.

Furthermore, important events were

the enlargement of the European Union
European Union
to 28 member-states and in the forthcoming years other candidates (Turkey, Montenegro, Macedonia, Serbia
Serbia
and Iceland) where new members initially don't join the Schengen area
Schengen area
and the Eurozone
Eurozone
for some time. the European Convention that led to the European Constitution
European Constitution
that was signed in 2004 by the 25 Heads of State, but was not ratified by all national parliaments or assemblies and so failed. Later most of its provisions were adopted through the Treaty of Lisbon
Treaty of Lisbon
that included additional opt-outs for some states. differences of view between EU members on some foreign diplomatic and military issues.

A clickable Euler diagram
Euler diagram
showing the relationships between various multinational European organisations and agreements.

v t e

The Economist
The Economist
in a 2004 article compared the variances of Europe to a lake that has many deep parts (areas in which countries are similar) and many shallow parts (areas in which countries have major differences).[7]

Currently in the EU there are the following cases of non-uniform application of the European Union
European Union
law:

permanent deviations[8] request by states to cooperate more than EU (post-accession: request to participate at EU level instead of less) request by states to cooperate less than general EU level

allowed by the EU Enhanced co-operation Opt-outs in the European Union Minor EU law derogations or exemptions special territories status

not allowed by the EU Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification Eurozone/Schengen suspensions (post accession: benchmarks for adoption of EU level)

Overview of non-uniformity inside the EU[edit]

Participant Schengen AFSJ CFR Euro EEA ESM EFC SRM Euro+ CSDP Prüm Patent Divorce Symbols

Austria x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Belgium x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Bulgaria c c x c x o x c x x x x x x

Croatia c x x c c o o c o x o o o o

Cyprus c x x x x x x x x x o x o x

Czech Republic x x x c x o o c o x o x o o

Denmark x o x o x o x c x o o x o o

Estonia x x x x x x x x x x x x x[9] o

Finland x x x x x x x x x x x x o o

France x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Germany x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Greece x x x x x x x x x x c x x x

Hungary x x x c x o x x o x x x x x

Ireland o o x x x x x x x x o x o o

Italy x x x x x x x x x x c x x x

Latvia x x x x x x x x x x o x x o

Lithuania x x x x x x x x x x o x x x

Luxembourg x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Malta x x x x x x x x x x o x x x

Netherlands x x x x x x x x x x x x o o

Poland x x o c x o x c x x o x o o

Portugal x x x x x x x x x x c x x x

Romania c c x c x o x x x x x x x x

Slovakia x x x x x x x x x x x x o x

Slovenia x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Spain x x x x x x x x x x x o x x

Sweden x x x c x o x o o x c x o o

United Kingdom o o o o x o o o o x o x o o

Participant Schengen AFSJ CFR Euro EEA ESM EFC SRM Euro+ CSDP Prüm Patent Divorce Symbols

 x  – member  c  – conditions to be fulfilled before joining or candidate  o  – non-member Pol. : politics — Soc. : society — Eco. : economy Participation of European countries in non EU-only integration initiatives[edit]

For integration activities not initiated by the EU see European integration

European Union

European Economic Area

Schengen Area

Eurozone

A number of countries have special relations to the European Union implementing most of its regulations. Prominently there are Norway, Iceland, Switzerland
Switzerland
and Liechtenstein
Liechtenstein
which are the only remaining EFTA members while all other former EFTA members have converted into EU members. Through agreements Norway, Iceland
Iceland
and Liechtenstein
Liechtenstein
(not including Switzerland) are members of the European Economic Area
European Economic Area
since 1994. As a consequence of taking part in the EU single market they need to adopt part of the Law of the European Union. Formally they would not need to fund the EU government but in practice they have opted to take on their part of financing EU institutions as required by EU law (see EEA and Norway
Norway
Grants) with the financial footprint of Norway
Norway
being equal to that of an EU member since 2009. Especially Norway
Norway
and Iceland
Iceland
are known to forfeit EU membership on the basis of EU fishery regulations that they want to opt out on. Both Norway
Norway
and Iceland
Iceland
have signed and implemented the Schengen zone agreements. During the turmoils of the financial crisis Iceland
Iceland
was looking into membership of the Eurozone
Eurozone
and it did formally apply to EU membership in 2009. Norway
Norway
has joined all EU political treaties and it has applied to EU membership multiple times but while fulfilling the requirements the government was vetoed by public vote in their own country in 1972 and 1994. This leaves Norway
Norway
to be integrated into Inner Europe's institutions while not being part their governing body.

Participant Schengen Euro CU EEA Energy Community ECT ECAA EEAgency EMCDDA EMSA EASA ERA EDA ESA NATO

Albania

x x x

x

Andorra

s x

Armenia

Austria x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Azerbaijan

Belarus

Belgium x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Bosnia and Herzegovina

x[10]

x x x

Bulgaria c c x x x x x x x x x x x

x

Croatia c c x c x x x x x x x x x

x

Cyprus c x x x x x x x x x x x x

Czech Republic x c x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Denmark x

x x x x x x x x x x

x x

Estonia x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Finland x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

France x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Georgia

x

s

Germany x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Greece x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Hungary x c x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Iceland

x

x x x x x x x x

x

Ireland

x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Italy x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Kazakhstan

Kosovo

x[10]

x x x

Latvia x x x x x x x x x x x x x

x

Liechtenstein x

x

x x x

x

Lithuania x x x x x x x x x x x x x

x

Luxembourg x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Macedonia

x x x

Malta x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Moldova

x x s

Monaco s s x

s

Montenegro

x x x

Netherlands x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Norway x

x

x x x x x

x x

Poland x c x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Portugal x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Romania c c x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Russia

San Marino

s x

s

Serbia

x x x

Slovakia x x x x x x x x x x x x x

x

Slovenia x x x x x x x x x x x x x

x

Spain x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Sweden x c x x x x x x x x x x x x

Switzerland x

x x

x x

x

Turkey

x

x x

x

x

Ukraine

x x

United Kingdom

x x x x x x x x x x x x x

Vatican City

s

Participant Schengen Euro CU EEA Energy Community ECT ECAA EEAgency EMCDDA EMSA EASA ERA EDA ESA

Multispeed European Union
European Union
2013:   EU countries integrated in all areas   EU countries with exceptions   Non-EU countries integrated into the Single Market and Schengen

     – member of the E.U.      – official candidate to join the E.U.      – recognised potential candidate to join the E.U. x – member c – conditions to be fulfilled before joining s – unilateral adoption/participation through another state who is a member/some instruments signed, but not yet ratified Post-Brexit-vote revival of "multispeed Europe" ideas[edit] In March 2017, European Commission
European Commission
president Jean-Claude Juncker released a five-point view of possible courses the EC and its to-be-27 post- Brexit
Brexit
members, looking forward to the year 2025. The points, among which Juncker expressed no preference, "range from standing down from policing of government financing of companies, for example, to a broader pullback that would essentially strip the EU back to being merely a single market", per one report. The updated possibilities would entail different member countries or groups of countries adopting different levels of participation with the union. The EC was approaching a March meeting of the 27 members in Rome and Juncker's paper addressed the options that "once invited scorn from convinced Europhiles" and seemed maybe even to have some backing "of lifelong federalists" like the president.[11] See also[edit]

Agencies of the European Union
European Union
– different examples of non-EU states participation and non-participation of some EU members Enhanced co-operation European Free Trade Association
European Free Trade Association
(EFTA) European integration Euroscepticism Eurozone Federal Europe Inner Six Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification Opt-outs in the European Union Pro-Europeanism Schengen Agreement

References[edit]

^ Marcin Zaborowski: Germany
Germany
and EU Enlargement: From Rapprochement to "Reaproachment"? In: Helene Sjursen (Ed.), Enlargement in perspective, ARENA Report February 2005, p. 46. ^ Karl Lamers / Wolfgang Schäuble: Überlegungen zur europäischen Politik (Reflections on European Policy). See also Gilles Andréani: What future for federalism?, Centre for European Reform Essays, September 2002, ISBN 1-901229-33-5, p. 7-8. ^ Michael Mertes
Michael Mertes
/ Norbert J. Prill: Der verhängnisvolle Irrtum eines Entweder-Oder. Eine Vision für Europa, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 19 July 1989. ^ Michael Mertes
Michael Mertes
/ Norbert J. Prill: Es wächst zusammen, was zusammengehören will. “Maastricht Zwei” muss die Europäische Union flexibel machen, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
9 December 1994, p. 11. ^ "Countries press ahead with limited single EU patent plan", out-law.com, 17 December 2010. ^ Parliament of the United Kingdom
United Kingdom
(12 March 1998). "Volume: 587, Part: 120 (12 Mar 1998: Column 391, Baroness Williams of Crosby)". House of Lords
House of Lords
Hansard. Retrieved 2007-10-13.  ^ 'Coalitions for the willing', The Economist, February 1, 2007. ^ In addition to the permanent deviations there are temporary transition periods for the application of certain EU law provisions in some member states, but these have an already set dates for lapsing. ^ Signed but not in force. ^ a b De facto uses the euro. ^ Valentine Pop, "Once Scorned, ‘Multispeed Europe’ Is Back" (subscription), Wall Street Journal, March 1, 2017. Retrieved 2017-03-01.

External links[edit]

Official EU glossary: Multi-speed Europe, Variable geometry Europe and other related concepts

v t e

European Union articles

History

Timeline

Pre-1945 1945–57 1958–72 1973–93 1993–2004 Since 2004

Predecessors

Timeline Founders European Coal and Steel Community
European Coal and Steel Community
(1951–2002) European Economic Community
European Economic Community
(1958–1993/2009) Euratom (1958–present) European Communities
European Communities
(1967–1993/2009) Justice and Home Affairs (1993–2009)

Geography

Extreme points Geographic centre Largest municipalities Urban areas Larger urban zones Member states Regions (first-level NUTS) Special
Special
territories

Politics

Institutions

European Council European Commission European Parliament Council of the European Union Court of Justice of the European Union European Central Bank European Court of Auditors

Agencies

Banking Border and coast security (Frontex) Disease prevention and control Environment Foreign affairs (External Action Service) Judicial cooperation (Eurojust) Law enforcement cooperation (Europol) Maritime safety Reconstruction

Law

Acquis Charter of Fundamental Rights Competition law Copyright law Directive

Citizens’ Rights Directive

Enhanced cooperation Environmental policy Four freedoms

labour mobility

Government procurement Journal Mechanism for Cooperation and Verification Legislative procedure Citizens' Initiative Regulation Rural Development Policy Schengen Area Treaties

opt-outs

LGBT rights

Politics

Elections

parliamentary constituencies

Enlargement

1973 1981 1986 1995 2004 2007 2013 Future

Euromyths Political parties (National parties by affiliation) Euroscepticism Foreign relations Integration Parliamentary groups Pro-Europeanism Withdrawal (Brexit) 2012 Nobel Peace Prize

Economy

Budget Central bank Agricultural policy Fisheries policy Currencies Energy policy Euro Eurozone Free trade agreements Investment bank Investment fund Regional development Single market Societas Europaea Solidarity Fund Transport

Galileo navigation system

minimum wage average wage unemployment rate health expense per person Healthcare Health Insurance Card Driving licence European Common Aviation Area

Culture

Citizenship

passports identity cards

Cultural policies Demographics Douzelage Driving licence Education House of European History Institute of Innovation and Technology Laissez-passer Languages Media freedom Public holidays Religion Sport Telephone numbers Statistics Symbols

Lists

Concepts, acronyms, & jargon Agencies Books Companies Cities with more than 100,000 inhabitants Largest cities by population within city limits Directives Tallest buildings Terrorist incidents Vehicle registration plates

Theory

Eurosphere Intergovernmentalism Multi-speed Neofunctionalism Optimum currency area Supranational union

Outline

Bo

.