HOME
The Info List - Muhammad Bin Tughluq


--- Advertisement ---



(i) (i)

MUHAMMAD BIN TUGHLUQ (also PRINCE FAKHR MALIK, JAUNA KHAN, ULUGH KHAN; died 20 March 1351) was the Sultan of Delhi
Delhi
of Turkic descent through 1324 to 1351. He was the eldest son of Ghiyas-ud-din Tughlaq of the Tughluq dynasty . He was born in Kotla Tolay Khan in Multan
Multan
. His wife was the daughter of the Raja
Raja
of Dipalpur . Ghiyas-ud-din sent the young Muhammad to the Deccan
Deccan
to campaign against king Prataparudra of the Kakatiya dynasty whose capital was at Warangal in 1321 and 1323. Muhammad acceded to the Delhi
Delhi
throne upon his father's death in 1325.

He was interested in medicine and was skilled in several languages — Persian, Arabic, Turkish and Sanskrit Ibn Battuta , the famous traveller from Morocco, was a guest at his court. From his accession to the throne in 1325 until his death in 1351, Muhammad contended with 22 rebellions, pursuing his policies consistently and ruthlessly. It is said that he deliberately killed his father Ghiyasudden Tughlaq to ascend the throne of Delhi, although modern historians do not support this theory. From the chronicles of Barani, we came to know that, on his return from a campaign, Ghiyasuddin was watching the parade of the elephants he got as war booty and then the stage along with the Sultan himself, collapsed. It is noteworthy that the salary of the wazir of Muhammed-Bin-Tughlaq was equal to the income of the then Iraq
Iraq
under the Persian Shah. It can be said that he was a capable ruler but his policies were far-sighted and were discordant with the socio-political structure at the time.

CONTENTS

* 1 Reign

* 1.1 Annexation

* 1.2 Shifting of capital

* 1.2.1 Impact of the Change of Capital

* 1.3 Failed expeditions

* 2 Collapse of the empire * 3 Coins * 4 Character * 5 In popular culture * 6 Footnotes * 7 References * 8 External links

REIGN

Muhammad Bin Tughlaq (Jauna Khan) came to throne after the accidental death of his father Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq and remained an unsuccessful sultan till his last breath. He had been a man of controversies and crisis, he faced worst attacks of Mongols
Mongols
, He experimented to shift his capital from Delhi
Delhi
to Daulatabad that was disastrous decision which cost millions of tankas and thousands of lives.

ANNEXATION

After the death of his father Ghiyasuddin Tughluq , Muhammad bin Tughluq ascended the throne of Tughluq dynasty of Delhi
Delhi
in February, 1325 A.D. Unlike the Khaljis who did not annex stable kingdoms, Tughluq would annex kingdoms around his sultanate. In his reign, he conquered Warangal (in present-day Telangana
Telangana
, India) Malabar and Madurai
Madurai
, ( Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu
, India), and areas up to the modern day southern tip of the Indian state of Karnataka
Karnataka
. In the conquered territories, Tughluq created a new set of revenue officials to assess the financial aspects of the area. Their accounts helped the audit in the office of the wazir .

SHIFTING OF CAPITAL

In 1327, Tughluq passed an order to shift the capital from Delhi
Delhi
to Daulatabad (in present-day Maharashtra
Maharashtra
) in the Deccan
Deccan
region of south India. Tughluq said that it would help him to establish control over the fertile land of the Deccan
Deccan
plateau. He also felt that it would make him safe from the Mongol invasions which were mainly aimed at Delhi
Delhi
and regions in north India. Also, it was not always possible to operate an army from Delhi
Delhi
for the occupation of Southern states. Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq himself had spent a number of years while a prince in occupying and guarding the southern states during the reign of his father. Daulatabad was also situated at a central place so the administration of both the north and the south could be possible.

All facilities were provided for those who were required to migrate to Daulatabad . It is believed that the general public of Delhi
Delhi
was not in favour of shifting base to Daulatabad. This seems to have annoyed Tughluq, for he ordered all people of Delhi
Delhi
to proceed to Daulatabad with their belongings. Ibn Batuta cites that the force was applied without any leniency. Barani observes: "Without consultation or weighting the pros and cons, he brought run on Delhi
Delhi
which for 170 to 180 years had grown in prosperity and rivaled Baghdad and Cairo. The city with its Sarais and suburbs and villages spread over four or five leagues, all was destroyed (i.e., deserted). Not a cat or a dog was left."

A broad road was constructed for convenience. Shady trees were planted on both sides of the road; he set up halting stations at an interval of two miles. Provisions for food and water were also made available at the stations. Tughluq established a khanqah at each of the station where at least one sufi saint was stationed. A regular postal service was established between Delhi
Delhi
and Daulatabad. In 1329, his mother also went to Daulatabad, accompanied by the nobles. By around the same year, Tughluq summoned all the slaves, nobles, servants, ulema , sufis to the new capital. The new capital was divided into wards called mohalla with separate quarters for different people like soldiers, poets, judges, nobles. Grants were also given by Tughluq to the immigrants. Even though the citizens migrated, they showed dissent. In the process, many died on the road due to hunger and exhaustion. Moreover, coins minted in Daulatabad in around 1333, showed that Daulatabad was "the second capital".

However, in 1334 there was a rebellion in Mabar. While on his way to suppress the rebellion, there was an outbreak of bubonic plague at Bidar
Bidar
due to which Tughluq himself became ill, and many of his soldiers died. While he retreated back to Daulatabad, Mabar and Dwarsamudra broke away from Tughluq control. This was followed by a revolt in Bengal
Bengal
. Fearing that the sultanate's northern borders were exposed to attacks, in 1335, he decided to shift the capital back to Delhi, allowing the citizens to return to their previous city.

Impact Of The Change Of Capital

While most of the Medieval historians, including Barani and Ibn Batuta, tend to have implied that Delhi
Delhi
was entirely emptied (as is famously mentioned by Barani that not a dog or cat was left), it is generally believed that this is just an exaggeration. Such exaggerated accounts simply imply that Delhi
Delhi
suffered a downfall in its stature and trade. Besides, it is believed that only the powerful and nobility suffered hardships, if any. Two Sanskrit inscriptions dated 1327 and 1328 A.D. confirm this view and establish the prosperity of the Hindus of Delhi
Delhi
and its vicinity at that time.

One of them records the foundation of a well by a Brahman of the name of Srindhara at the village of Nadayana, the modern Naraina, near Delhi. The verses of this inscription speak of Muhammad bin Tughluq
Muhammad bin Tughluq
as "the mighty Saka Lord" and throw light on the favorable conditions in which the Hindu
Hindu
families of Delhi
Delhi
lived.

The second inscription found at the village of Sarbar, five miles from Delhi, also refers to the prosperity of a Hindu
Hindu
family. These inscriptions, read with Barani's remarks about the "misery of the selected people", lead to the inference that Sultan Muhammad's orders for migration applied to the leading Mussulman families only. This is also supported by Barani's references to heavy casualties in these words: "And on all sides of the old infidel land of Deogiri, there sprang up graveyards of the Mussulmans."

There is more to the transfer of capital than what is generally written. It is believed that Tughluq wanted to make Daulatabad an Islamic cultural centre, thereby helping him to have better control over the region, reducing the number of "Hindu" rebellions. His efforts to bring Ulema and Shaikhs from provincial towns and make them settle down in that city give a clue to his true intentions. The view of Muhammad Tughluq was that something like the above had to be done in the Deccan
Deccan
to strengthen the Muslim position in that area.

As regards its remote effects, the Deccan
Deccan
experiment of Muhammad Tughluq was a remarkable success. The boundaries which had separated the North from the South broke down. It is true that the extension of the administrative power of the Delhi Sultanate into the Deccan failed, but so far as the extension of the cultural institutions was concerned, it was successful.

FAILED EXPEDITIONS

After the death of Genghis Khan
Genghis Khan
, one line of his descendants, the Chagatai Khanate , ruled over Turkistan
Turkistan
and Transoxiana and another branch of Hulagu Khan
Hulagu Khan
conquered present day Iran
Iran
and Iraq
Iraq
. However, at the time of Tughluq, both of the dynasties were on the downfall, with conditions in Transoxiana unstable after the death of Tarmashirin . He was ambitious of annexing these kingdoms. He invited nobles and leaders from these regions and gave them grants. Partly with their help and partly from his own kingdom, Tughluq raised an army of three million and seven hundred thousand soldiers in 1329. Barani has written that Tughluq took no step to check the ability of the soldiers or the brand of horses. They were paid in one year advance, and after being kept idle for one year, Tughluq found it difficult to pay them. Therefore, he decided to disperse and dissolve the soldiers in 1329.

In 1333, Tughluq led the Qarachil expedition to the Kullu
Kullu
-Kangra region of modern-day Himachal Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh
in India
India
. Historians like Badauni and Ferishtah wrote that Tughluq originally wanted to cross the Himalayas and invade China
China
. However, he faced local resistance in Himachal
Himachal
. His army was not able to fight in the hills and was defeated by the Katoch clan of Kangra
Kangra
, nearly all his 10,00 soldiers perished and he was forced to retreat.

COLLAPSE OF THE EMPIRE

Tughluq died in 1351 on his way to Thatta
Thatta
, Sindh
Sindh
in order to intervene in a war between members of the Gujjar tribe. He had lived to see his empire fall apart. It was during his reign that Turkish empire of Delhi
Delhi
collapsed by two fold resistance. One was from Rana Hammeer Singh Sisodia of Mewar and other from Harihara and Bukka of South India. All these three warriors were able to inflict humiliating defeats on the Sultanate army and crush the empire. While Rana Hammeera liberated the strategic Rajaputana, Harihara and Bukka established a new empire called Vijayanagar that revived the prosperity of Sangam era in South India. Several other south Indian rulers like Prolaya Vema Reddy of the Reddy dynasty
Reddy dynasty
, Musunuri Kaapaaneedu , etc. also contributed to the downfall of the Delhi sultanate. To add to Tughluq's woes, his own generals rebelled against him. The Bahmani kingdom was founded in the Deccan.

COINS

Forced token currency coin

Historian Ishwari Prasad writes that different coins of different shapes and sizes were produced by his mints which lacked the artistic perfection of design and finish. In 1330, after his failed expedition to Deogiri , he issued token currency; that is coins of brass and copper were minted whose value was equal to that of gold and silver coins. Historian Ziauddin Barani felt that this step was taken by Tughluq as he wanted to annex all the inhabited areas of the world for which a treasury was required to pay the army. Barani had also written that the sultan's treasury had been exhausted by his action of giving rewards and gifts in gold. This experiment failed, because, as said by Barani, "the house of every Hindu
Hindu
became a mint". During his time, most of the Hindu
Hindu
citizens were goldsmiths and hence they knew how to make coins. In the rural areas, officials like the muqaddams paid the revenue in brass and copper coins and also used the same coins to purchase arms and horses. As a result, the value of coins decreased and, as said by Satish Chandra , the coins became "as worthless as stones". This also disrupted the trade and commerce. The token currency had inscriptions marking the use of new coins instead of the royal seal and so the citizens could not distinguish between the official and the forged coins. Records show that the use of token currency has stopped in 1333 as Ibn Batuta who came to Delhi
Delhi
in 1334 and wrote a journal made no mention of this currency.

CHARACTER

Tughluq was a strict Muslim, maintaining his five prayers during a day, used to fast in Ramadan. Courtesans had hailed Tughluq as a "man of knowledge" and had interest in subjects like philosophy, medicine, mathematics, religion, Persian and Urdu/Hindustani poetry. Stanley Lane-Poole states in his "Medieval India", "He was perfect in the humanities of his day, a keen student of Persian poetry.........a master of style, supremely eloquent in an age of rhetoric, a philosopher trained in Logic and Greek metaphysics, with whom scholars feared to argue, a mathematician and lover of science. Barani has written that Tughluq wanted the traditions of the nubuwwah to be followed in his kingdom. Even though he did not believe in mysticism, Chandra states that he respected the Sufi
Sufi
saints, which is evident from the fact of his building of the mausoleum of the saint Nizamuddin Auliya at Nizamuddin Dargah . Critics has called him hasty in nature, owing to most of his experiments getting failed because lack of preparation. Ibn Batuta has also written that he depended on his own judgement and rarely took advice from others and has also criticised him for his giving of excessive gifts and "harsh punishments".

IN POPULAR CULTURE

* A play was made on him by Girish Karnad . * Muhammad bin Tughluq
Muhammad bin Tughluq
(1971) is the title of a satirical film in Tamil based on a play of the same name by Cho Ramaswamy .

FOOTNOTES

* ^ The term Khurasan refers to a historical area in Central Asia which included the mentioned regions.

REFERENCES

* ^ Douie, James M. (1916) The Panjab North-West Frontier Province and Kashmir Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, page 171, OCLC 222226951 * ^ Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. pp. 91–97. ISBN 978-9-38060-734-4 . * ^ A B C D E Lane-Poole, Stanley (2007). Medieval India
India
(Under Mohammadan Rule A.D 712-1764). Lahore, Pakistan: Sang-e-Meel Publications. pp. 123–126. ISBN 969-35-2052-1 . * ^ Canetti, Elias (1984). Crowds and Power. New York: