The Info List - Muhammad Bin Tughluq

--- Advertisement ---

Muhammad bin Tughluq
Muhammad bin Tughluq
(also Prince Fakhr Malik, Jauna Khan, Ulugh Khan; died 20 March 1351) was the Sultan of Delhi
from 1325 to 1351. He was the eldest son of Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq, the Turko-Indian[1] founder of the Tughluq dynasty. He was born in Kotla Tolay Khan in Multan.His wife was the daughter of the Raja
of Dipalpur.[2] Ghiyas-ud-din sent the young Muhammad to the Deccan to campaign against king Prataparudra of the Kakatiya dynasty
Kakatiya dynasty
whose capital was at Warangal
in 1321 and 1323.[3] Muhammad ascended to the Delhi
throne upon his father's death in 1325. He was interested in medicine and was skilled in several languages — Persian, Arabic, Turkish and Sanskrit[4] Ibn Battuta, the famous traveler and jurist from Morocco, was a guest at his court and wrote about his suzerainty in his book.[5] From his accession to the throne in 1325 until his death in 1351, Muhammad contended with 22 rebellions, pursuing his policies, consistently and ruthlessly.


1 Early life 2 Reign

2.1 Annexation 2.2 Shifting of capital

2.2.1 Impact of the Change of Capital

2.3 Failed expeditions

3 Collapse of the empire 4 Coins 5 Religious policy 6 Character 7 In popular culture 8 Footnotes 9 References 10 Bibliography 11 External links

Early life[edit] Muhammad bin Tughluq
Muhammad bin Tughluq
was born to Ghiyas-ud-din Tughlaq, who was in turn the son of a Turkic slave father and a Hindu
Indian concubine mother, and was the founder of the Tughluq dynasty
Tughluq dynasty
after taking control of the Delhi
Sultanate.[1] His mother was known by the title Makhduma-i-Jahan, who was known for being a philanthropist, having founded many hospitals.[6] Reign[edit] Muhammad Bin Tughlaq (Jauna Khan) came to throne after death of his father Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq. While he had good intentions of inviting learned men to his court and implementing new policies, he remained largely unsuccessful and failed in most of his enterprises. He had been a man of controversies and crisis. He faced attacks of Mongols, dissension within his own support group, and rebellions from a very large and diverse population. In an effort to adapt to his growing empire, he attempted to shift his capital from Delhi
to Daulatabad, which was supposed to be a more central location, but it was a disastrous decision and was costly. Annexation[edit] After the death of his father Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq, Muhammad bin Tughlaq ascended the throne of Tughluq dynasty
Tughluq dynasty
of Delhi
in February, 1325 A.D. Unlike the Khaljis who did not annex stable kingdoms, Tughluq would annex kingdoms around his sultanate. In his reign, he conquered Warangal
(in present-day Telangana, India) Malabar and Madurai, (Tamil Nadu, India), and areas up to the modern day southern tip of the Indian state of Karnataka. In the conquered territories, Tughluq created a new set of revenue officials to assess the financial aspects of the area. Their accounts helped the audit in the office of the wazir.[7] Shifting of capital[edit] In 1327, Tughluq passed an order to shift the capital from Delhi
to Daulatabad (in present-day Maharashtra) in the Deccan region of south India. Tughluq said that it would help him to establish control over the fertile land of the Deccan plateau
Deccan plateau
and to create a more accessible capital since his empire had grown more in the south. [8] He also felt that it would make him safe from the Mongol invasions which were mainly aimed at Delhi
and regions in north India.[9] It was not always possible to operate an army from Delhi
for the occupation of Southern states. Muhammad-bin-Tughlaq himself had spent a number of years as a prince on campaign in the southern states during the reign of his father. Daulatabad was also situated at a central place so the administration of both the north and the south could be possible.[10][unreliable source?] All facilities were provided for those who were required to migrate to Daulatabad. It is believed that the general public of Delhi
was not in favour of shifting the base to Daulatabad. This seems to have annoyed Tughluq, for he ordered all people of Delhi
to proceed to Daulatabad with their belongings. Ibn Batuta cites that the force was applied without any leniency. Ziauddin Barani
Ziauddin Barani
observes: "Without consultation or weighting the pros and cons, he brought ruin on Delhi
which for 170 to 180 years had grown in prosperity and rivaled Baghdad and Cairo. The city with its Sarais and suburbs and villages spread over four or five leagues, all was destroyed (i.e., deserted). Not a cat or a dog was left."[11][unreliable source?] A broad road was constructed for convenience. Shady trees were planted on both sides of the road; he set up halting stations at an interval of two miles. Provisions for food and water were also made available at the stations. Tughluq established a khanqah at each of the station where at least one sufi saint was stationed. A regular postal service was established between Delhi
and Daulatabad. In 1329, his mother also went to Daulatabad, accompanied by the nobles. By around the same year, Tughluq summoned all the slaves, nobles, servants, ulema, sufis to the new capital.[7] The new capital was divided into wards called mohalla with separate quarters for different people like soldiers, poets, judges, nobles. Grants were also given by Tughluq to the immigrants. Even though the citizens migrated, they showed dissent. In the process, many died on the road due to hunger and exhaustion. Moreover, coins minted in Daulatabad around 1333, showed that Daulatabad was "the second capital".[12] However, in 1334 there was a rebellion in Mabar. While on his way to suppress the rebellion, there was an outbreak of bubonic plague at Bidar
due to which Tughluq himself became ill, and many of his soldiers died. While he retreated back to Daulatabad, Mabar and Dwarsamudra broke away from Tughluq control. This was followed by a revolt in Bengal. Fearing that the sultanate's northern borders were exposed to attacks, in 1335, he decided to shift the capital back to Delhi, allowing the citizens to return to their previous city.[7] Impact of the Change of Capital[edit] While most of the Medieval historians, including Barani and Ibn Battuta, tend to have implied that Delhi
was entirely emptied (as is famously mentioned by Barani that not a dog or cat was left), it is generally believed that this is just an exaggeration. Such exaggerated accounts simply imply that Delhi
suffered a downfall in its stature and trade. Besides, it is believed that only the powerful and nobility suffered hardships, if any. Two Sanskrit inscriptions dated 1327 and 1328 A.D. confirm this view and establish the prosperity of the Hindus of Delhi
and its vicinity at that time.[4] There is more to the transfer of capital than what is generally written. It is believed that Tughluq wanted to make Daulatabad an Islamic cultural centre, thereby helping him to have better control over the region, reducing the number of "Hindu" rebellions. His efforts to bring Ulema
and Shaikhs from provincial towns and make them settle down in that city give a clue to his true intentions. The view of Muhammad Tughluq was that something like the above had to be done in the Deccan to strengthen the Muslim position in that area.[citation needed] The Deccan experiment did however succeed in breaking down barriers. The boundaries which had separated the North from the South broke down. It is true that the extension of the administrative power of the Delhi Sultanate
Delhi Sultanate
into the Deccan failed, but so far as the extension of the cultural institutions was concerned, it was successful.[11][unreliable source?] Failed expeditions[edit] After the death of Genghis Khan, one line of his descendants, the Chagatai Khanate, ruled over Turkistan
and Transoxiana
and another branch of Hulagu Khan
Hulagu Khan
conquered present day Iran
and Iraq. [note 1] However, at the time of Tughluq, both of the dynasties were on the downfall, with conditions in Transoxiana
unstable after the death of Tarmashirin.[7][4] He was ambitious of annexing these kingdoms. He invited nobles and leaders from these regions and gave them grants. Partly with their help and partly from his own kingdom, Tughluq raised an army of possibly up to three million and seven hundred thousand soldiers in 1329. Barani has written that Tughluq took no step to check the ability of the soldiers or the brand of horses. They were paid in one year advance, and after being kept idle for one year, Tughluq found it difficult to pay them. Therefore, he decided to disperse and dissolve the soldiers in 1329.[7] In 1333, Tughluq led the Qarachil expedition to the Kullu-Kangra region of modern-day Himachal Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh
in India. Historians like Badauni and Ferishtah wrote that Tughluq originally wanted to cross the Himalayas
and invade China. However, he faced local resistance in Himachal. His army was not able to fight in the hills and was defeated by the Hindu
kingdom of Kangra, nearly all his 10,000 soldiers perished and he was forced to retreat.[7] Collapse of the empire[edit] Tughluq died in 1351 on his way to Thatta, Sindh
in order to intervene in a war between members of the Gujjar
tribe. He had lived to see his empire fall apart. It was during his reign that Turkish empire of Delhi
collapsed by two fold resistance. One was from Rana Hammir Singh Sisodia of Mewar and other from Harihara and Bukka of South India. All these three warriors were able to inflict humiliating defeats on the Sultanate army and crush the empire. While Rana Hammir Singh liberated the strategic Rajputana, Harihara Raya and Bukka Raya established a new empire called Vijayanagara that revived the prosperity of Sangam era in South India. Several other south Indian rulers like Musunuri Kaapaaneedu, etc. also contributed to the downfall of the Delhi sultanate. To add to Tughluq's woes, his own generals rebelled against him. He is also called the man of knowledge. One of his generals would go on to form the Bahmani kingdom in the Deccan.[13] Coins[edit]

Forced token currency coin

Historian Ishwari Prasad writes that different coins of different shapes and sizes were produced by his mints which lacked the artistic perfection of design and finish. In 1330, after his failed expedition to Deogiri, he issued token currency; that is coins of brass and copper were minted whose value was equal to that of gold and silver coins. Historian Ziauddin Barani
Ziauddin Barani
felt that this step was taken by Tughluq as he wanted to annex all the inhabited areas of the world for which a treasury was required to pay the army. Barani had also written that the sultan's treasury had been exhausted by his action of giving rewards and gifts in gold. This experiment failed, because, as said by Barani, "the house of every Hindu
became a mint". During his time, most of the Hindu
citizens were goldsmiths and hence they knew how to make coins. In the rural areas, officials like the muqaddams paid the revenue in brass and copper coins and also used the same coins to purchase arms and horses.[14] As a result, the value of coins decreased and, as said by Satish Chandra, the coins became "as worthless as stones". This also disrupted the trade and commerce. The token currency had inscriptions marking the use of new coins instead of the royal seal and so the citizens could not distinguish between the official and the forged coins. Records show that the use of token currency has stopped in 1333 as Ibn Battuta
Ibn Battuta
who came to Delhi
in 1334 and wrote a journal made no mention of this currency.[15] Religious policy[edit] Ibn Battuta
Ibn Battuta
mentions that the king of China (the Yuan Emperor) had sent an embassy to Muhammad for reconstruction of a sacked temple at Sambhal. The envoys were however denied with the statement that only those living in a Muslim territory who paid the jizya could be permitted to restore a temple. Firuz Shah Tughlaq
Firuz Shah Tughlaq
had claimed that before his rule, idol-temples had been permitted to be rebuilt contrary to the Sharia.[16] Character[edit] Tughluq was a strict Muslim, maintaining his five prayers during a day, used to fast in Ramadan. According to 19th Century CE British historian Stanley Lane-Poole, apparently courtesans had hailed Tughluq as a "man of knowledge" and had interest in subjects like philosophy, medicine, mathematics, religion, Persian and Urdu/Hindustani poetry. In his "Medieval India", "He was perfect in the humanities of his day, a keen student of Persian poetry.........a master of style, supremely eloquent in an age of rhetoric, a philosopher trained in Logic and Greek metaphysics, with whom scholars feared to argue, a mathematician and lover of science."[4] Barani has written that Tughluq wanted the traditions of the nubuwwah to be followed in his kingdom.[17] Even though he did not believe in mysticism, Chandra states that he respected the Sufi
saints, which is evident from the fact of his building of the mausoleum of the saint Nizamuddin Auliya
Nizamuddin Auliya
at Nizamuddin Dargah.[additional citation(s) needed] Critics have called him hasty in nature, owing to most of his experiments failing due to lack of preparation. Ibn Battuta
Ibn Battuta
has also written that he depended on his own judgement and rarely took advice from others and has also criticized him for his giving of excessive gifts and "harsh punishments".[18] He was famous because whenever a gift was bestowed upon him, he would give gifts worth three times the value to show his stature. In popular culture[edit]

A play was made on him by Girish Karnad. Muhammad bin Tughluq
Muhammad bin Tughluq
(1971) is the title of a satirical film in Tamil based on a play of the same name by Cho Ramaswamy.


^ The term Khurasan
refers to a historical area in Central Asia which included the mentioned regions.


^ a b Jamal Malik (2008). Islam
in South Asia: A Short History. Brill Publishers. p. 104.  ^ Douie, James M. (1916) The Panjab North-West Frontier Province and Kashmir Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, page 171, OCLC 222226951 ^ Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. pp. 91–97. ISBN 978-9-38060-734-4.  ^ a b c d Lane-Poole, Stanley (2007). Medieval India (Under Mohammadan Rule A.D 712-1764). Lahore, Pakistan: Sang-e-Meel Publications. pp. 123–126. ISBN 969-35-2052-1.  ^ Canetti, Elias (1984). Crowds and Power. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. ISBN 0-374-51820-3.  ^ Simmi Jain (2003). Encyclopaedia of Indian Women Through the Ages: The middle ages. Gyan Publishing House. p. 209.  ^ a b c d e f Chandra, Satish (1997). Medieval India: From Sultanate to the Mughals. New Delhi, India: Har-Anand Publications. pp. 101–102. ISBN 978-8124105221.  ^ Ahmed, p. 79. ^ Ahmed, p. 80. ^ "Biography of Muhammad-Bin-Tughluq (1325-1351)". History Discussion - Discuss Anything About History. 2015-01-13. Retrieved 2016-05-17.  ^ a b Sen, Pragati. "Transfer of Capital to Daulatabad by Muhammad Bin Tughluq". www.preservearticles.com. Retrieved 2016-05-17.  ^ Chandra, p. 101. ^ Verma, D. C. History of Bijapur (New Delhi: Kumar Brothers, 1974) p. 1 ^ Chandra, p. 104. ^ Chandra, p. 105. ^ Peter Jackson. The Delhi
Sultanate: A Political and Military History. Cambridge University Press. p. 288.  ^ Chandra, p. 98. ^ Chandra, p. 99.


Elliot, H. M. (Henry Miers), Sir; John Dowson. "15. Táríkh-i Fíroz Sháhí, of Ziauddin Barani". The History of India, as Told by Its Own Historians. The Muhammadan Period (Vol 3.). London : Trübner & Co.  Chandra, Satish (2004). Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals- Delhi
Sultanat (1206-1526) - Part One. Har-Anand Publications. ISBN 9788124110645.  Ahmed, Farooqui Salma (2011). A Comprehensive History of Medieval India: Twelfth to the Mid-Eighteenth Century. Pearson Education India. ISBN 9788131732021. 

External links[edit]

Encyclopædia Britannica – Muhammad ibn Tughluq

Preceded by Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq Sultan of Delhi 1325–1351 Succeeded by