Mathews v. Eldridge
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Mathews v. Eldridge'', 424 U.S. 319 (1976), is a case in which the
United States Supreme Court The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point o ...
held that individuals have a statutorily granted property right in
Social Security Welfare, or commonly social welfare, is a type of government support intended to ensure that members of a society can meet basic human needs such as food and shelter. Social security may either be synonymous with welfare, or refer specifical ...
benefits, and the termination of such benefits implicates due process but does not require a pre-termination hearing. The case is significant in the development of American administrative law.


Legal principles

Determining the constitutional sufficiency of administrative procedures, prior to the initial termination of benefits and pending review, requires consideration of three factors: #The interests of the individual in retaining their property and the injury threatened by the official action; #The risk of error through the procedures used and probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; #The costs and administrative burden of the additional process, and the interests of the government in efficient adjudication. The Court determined that Social Security benefits are a statutorily-created property right and so implicate due process. However, after balancing the three factors, the Court ruled that the administrative procedures in place were constitutional and held that termination of Social Security benefits does not require a pre-termination hearing. See Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 347-49 (1976).


Background

The
Social Security Administration The United States Social Security Administration (SSA) is an independent agency of the U.S. federal government that administers Social Security, a social insurance program consisting of retirement, disability and survivor benefits. To qualify ...
terminated Eldridge's benefits by its normal procedures. However, Eldridge was not provided with a hearing before the termination of his benefits in which he could argue for a continuation of the benefits. He sued even though he had not exhausted his post-termination administrative remedies. The district court held that the termination was unconstitutional, and the court of appeals affirmed.


Decision

The Supreme Court reversed and held that pre-termination hearing was not required.


See also

* List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 424 * ''
Goldberg v. Kelly ''Goldberg v. Kelly'', 397 U.S. 254 (1970), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires an evidentiary hearing before a recip ...
'' (1970)


External links

* {{DEFAULTSORT:Mathews V. Eldridge United States civil due process case law United States administrative case law United States Supreme Court cases 1976 in United States case law Social Security lawsuits United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court