Liber Eliensis

The ''Liber Eliensis'' is a 12th-century English chronicle and history, written in Latin. Composed in three books, it was written at Ely Abbey on the island of Ely in the fenlands of eastern Cambridgeshire. Ely Abbey became the cathedral of a newly formed bishopric in 1109. Traditionally the author of the anonymous work has been given as Richard or Thomas, two monks at Ely, one of whom, Richard, has been identified with an official of the monastery, but some historians hold that neither Richard nor Thomas was the author.

The ''Liber'' covers the period from the founding of the abbey in 673 until the middle of the 12th century, building on earlier historical works. It incorporates documents and stories of saints' lives. The work typifies a type of local history produced during the latter part of the 12th century. Similar books were written at other English monasteries. The longest of the contemporary local histories, the ''Liber'' chronicles the devastation that the Anarchy caused during the reign of King Stephen. It also documents the career of Nigel, the Bishop of Ely from 1133 to 1169, and his disputes with King Stephen. Other themes include the miracles worked by the monastery's patron saint, Æthelthryth, and gifts of land to Ely.

Two complete manuscripts survive, complemented by partial manuscripts. The Latin text was published in 1962, and an English translation followed in 2005. Extracts had appeared in print earlier.

The ''Liber Eliensis'' provides an important history of the region and period it covers, and particularly for the abbey and bishopric of Ely.

Background and authorship

The ''Liber Eliensis'' was written at Ely Abbey, which became Ely Cathedral upon conversion into a bishopric in 1109.Stafford ''Unification and Conquest'' p. 20Stafford ''Unification and Conquest'' pp. 180–181 The historian Elisabeth van Houts believes that it was written in two stages: first under Bishop Hervey le Breton, in office from 1109 to 1133; and continued under Bishop Geoffrey Ridel, who served from 1173 to 1189. For van Houts, the first stage was the translation of an Old English work into Latin, commissioned by Bishop Hervey. The rest of the work, van Houts argues, was composed in the 1170s.van Houts "Historical Writing" ''Companion to the Anglo-Norman World'' p. 110 However, E. O. Blake, who edited the first Latin printing of the work, concludes that the ''Liber'' was probably composed in three parts, based on its contents; the first book of the ''Liber'' was begun after 1131, when one of the sources used in the ''Liber'' was completed. The second has a preface apologising for the delay in its completion, and could not have been started before 1154, as it records events from that year. The third and final book was completed between 1169, when Bishop Nigel died and whose death is mentioned in the book, and 1174, when a new bishop was appointed. As there is no mention of Nigel's replacement, Blake states that this suggests that book three was finished before the new bishop took office.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' pp. xlvi–xlix

Traditionally the work was ascribed to either Thomas or Richard, two monks of Ely mentioned in the text.Fairweather "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' p. xvii The historian Antonia Gransden is inclined to believe that the work is by Richard, who is usually identified with the Richard who was recorded as sub-prior and prior of Ely, holding the latter office from 1177 until some time between 1189 and 1194.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' p. 271 Blake thinks that Richard was the author, but he considers the evidence to be inconclusive. Janet Fairweather, a classicist and a recent translator of the ''Liber'', suggests that it may have been written by someone other than the traditional candidates. Whoever the author, the ''Liber'' specifically states that it was written at the bidding of some members of the monastic community at Ely.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' p. 272

The ''Liber'' is one of a number of monastic histories written during the middle and later 12th century, when a number of monasteries in northern and southern England produced works devoted to recording the histories of their religious houses and local areas. In the south, these included the ''Historia Ecclesie Abbendonensis'' of Abingdon Abbey, the ''Chronicon Abbatiae Rameseiensis'' of Ramsey Abbey, the '' Chronicon Angliae Petriburgense'' of Peterborough Abbey, a history of the see of Bath and Wells, and the ''Chronicon Monasterii de Bello'' of Battle Abbey. The northern histories record the foundation stories of the various Cistercian houses in the north, along with other information relating to those houses. Those from the south, including the ''Liber Eliensis'', mainly concern themselves with the various controversies involving their respective religious houses. The northern histories are less concerned with controversy, and overall are more prone to hagiography.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' pp. 269–270

Sources

To a large extent the work is composite; that is, it is a compilation borrowing from or at least using earlier sources. These include the early medieval writer Bede's ''Ecclesiastical History of the English People'', a chronicle that was associated with Bede's ''De temporum ratione'', the '' Chronicon ex chronicis'', and William of Poitiers' ''Gesta Guillelmi II ducis Normannorum''. Lesser-used sources include the ''Anglo-Saxon Chronicle'', Orderic Vitalis' ''Historia Ecclesiastica'', Stephen of Ripon's ''Vita Sancti Wilfrithi'', William of Malmesbury's '' Gesta pontificum Anglorum'', a list of the kings of Wessex, the Old English poem '' The Battle of Maldon'', and a number of saints' lives, including some written by Eadmer, Felix, Abbo of Fleury, Goscelin, and Osbern of Canterbury.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' pp. xxviii–xxix The work on Maldon was included because the hero of the work was Byrhtnoth, a patron of the monastery.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' p. 274

Works more directly related to Ely were also used. The primary one of these works was Bishop Æthelwold of Winchester's ''Libellus'', large parts of which were copied into the ''Liber Eliensis''.Stafford ''Unification and Conquest'' p. 16 Also incorporated into the ''Liber'' was an earlier ''Vita'', or saints' life, on Æthelthryth, the founder and first abbess of Ely.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' pp. xxx–xxxi A work on the benefactors of the abbey was also used,Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' p. xxxviii and the material from three surviving cartularies.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' p. xxxix These documents were translated from their original Old English into Latin by the compiler. Another source, as related in the ''Liber'' itself, was a work about Hereward the Wake written by a brother monk known as Richard. Modern historians have identified it with the '' Gesta Herwardi'' known from a 13th-century manuscript. It is, however, unclear whether the compiler of the ''Liber'' used the exact text of the ''Gesta'' as it has come down to us, or a different, earlier manuscript.van Houts "Hereward and Flanders" ''Anglo-Saxon England 28'' pp. 202–204

Some of these sources may originally have been oral works. A number of the stories in the narrative parts of the ''Liber'' resemble Scandinavian sagas, including the story about King Cnut visiting the monastery and singing an Anglo-Saxon song to the assembled monks. It is possible that the information on Hereward and Byrhtnoth originally came from orally transmitted tales that were written down.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' p. 275

Contents

The work is traditionally divided into three books. Along with the history in Book I the first section also contains a prologue and a preface. It discusses the founding of the Abbey of Ely and the background of the foundress, Æthelthryth. The first book also deals with the history of the abbey and its abbesses until the Danish invasions of the 9th century. A description of the destruction of the abbey by the Danes and of King Edgar's (reigned 959–975) rule concludes the book.Fairweather (ed.) ''Liber Eliensis'' pp. 9–11 The second book, Book II, begins with the restoration of the abbey during Edgar's reign, under Bishop Æthelwold. Accounts of the subsequent abbots until the last, Richard, are included in Book II, as well as numerous charters and other documents.Fairweather (ed.) ''Liber Eliensis'' pp. 85–95 The final book, Book III, contains information on the conversion of the abbey to a bishopric, and on the first few bishops; it concludes with a description of the martyrdom of Thomas Becket. Interspersed with the historical narrative are a number of documents and charters relating to the bishops.Fairweather (ed.) ''Liber Eliensis'' pp. 286–296

The work also depicts the devastation that the Anarchy caused during King Stephen's reign. The chronicler states that failure of the harvest and pillaging caused a famine. The work describes the area around the abbey for as being filled with unburied corpses, and that the price of a bushel of grain rose to 200 pence. The long descriptions of Nigel of Ely's disputes with King Stephen lead to a discussion of the Battle of Lincoln and other matters not directly related to Ely. The ''Liber'' gives a detailed account of Nigel's career, although in general the chronicle's author favours Stephen over his own bishop. The ascension of King Henry II to the English throne is considered to be an excellent event, and the ''Liber'' praises the new king.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' pp. 280–281

An important part of the work was devoted to the miracles and glorification of Ely's patroness, Saint Æthelthryth. The very beginning of the work incorporates an earlier ''Vita'', or ''Life'', of Æthelthryth, which resembles the ''Vitae'' of other saints written by Goscelin in the 11th century; Goscelin is known to have visited Ely.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' p. 282 The work may have helped to increase the number of pilgrims visiting Ely, as well as enabling the monks to better explain the history of earlier donations to the abbey. Many of the gifts to the abbey church are described, such as the altar cloth donated by Queen Emma (died 1052), wife of both King Æthelred II (died 1016) and King Cnut (died 1035), with a short history of the circumstances of the gift.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' pp. 284–285 The miracle stories frequently say that those who wished cures or miracles similar to those in the ''Liber'' would need to come to the monastery, where they could make a donation.Paxton "Textual Communities" ''Anglo-Norman Studies XXVI'' p. 124 The historian Jennifer Paxton argues that increasing pilgrimage to the monastery was one of the main goals of the compilers of the ''Liber''.Paxton "Textual Communities" ''Anglo-Norman Studies XXVI'' p. 128

Another concern of the chronicle was the acquisition of land by the abbey. The work incorporates three pre-existing inventories of the abbey's possessions, and records each gift to the abbey, giving the grantor and occasionally details of the grantor's life. This detailed record of the various rights and possessions of the abbey was useful if those possessions needed to be defended against outside or inside conflicts. The ''Liber'' was used by the monks to defend their claims to be the real heirs of the abbey's rights and property rather than the bishops, after the conversion of the abbey into a bishopric. The chronicle also records the division of property between the monks and the newly appointed bishop. According to the chronicler, the division took place during the episcopate of the first bishop, Hervey le Breton, and was characterised as barely adequate for the needs of the monks. Later the chronicle records documents from the bishops that defined the separation between the monks and the episcopate.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' pp. 283–284 The chronicle also records the conflict between the abbey and various Bishops of Lincoln, which had continued until the abbey became a bishopric in 1109.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' p. 286

A third theme of the work is the stress on the importance and number of distinguished burials that took place at Ely. They would have increased the desire of others to be buried there, which would have benefited the community by the donations that would have flowed from those wishing to secure their burial. The ''Liber'' stresses the burials of Æthelstan, a Bishop of Elmham, that of Ælfwine, another Bishop of Elmham, and Wulfstan, an Archbishop of York.Paxton "Textual Communities" ''Anglo-Norman Studies XXVI'' pp. 132–134

Influence

The ''Liber'' was familiar to the 13th-century chronicler Matthew Paris, who used it along with the ''Chronicon Abbatiae Rameseiensis'' of Ramsey Abbey in his own historical works. Another 13th-century English writer, Roger of Wendover, was also aware of the ''Liber''.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' p. 374 and footnote 147

Some of the information contained in the ''Liber'' is important to historians. It is in the ''Liber'' that the first statement that Æthelwold translated the '' Benedictine Rule'' into Old English is made.Gneuss "Origin of Standard Old English" ''Anglo-Saxon England 1'' pp. 73–74 and footnote 3 The ''Liber'' is the longest of the local histories produced in England during the 12th century, and it contains a description of the royal chancery, which might be the earliest evidence for the existence of that office in the Anglo-Saxon kingdom. The ''Liber'' describes how King Edgar (died 975) granted the abbey the office of chancellor (head of the chancery), but the authenticity of the passage is unclear.Gransden ''Historical Writing'' p. 276 The existence of a formal chancery office in Anglo-Saxon England before the Norman Conquest is a matter of some debate amongst historians.Rankin "Chancery, Royal" ''Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England''

The historian Dorothy Whitelock says of the work that it is "unique among post-Conquest monastic histories".Quoted in Royal Historical Society ''Texts and Calendars II'' p. 90 It was written to help buttress the claims of Ely to a judicial liberty, or the exercise of all the royal rights within a hundred.Warren ''Governance'' pp. 46–47 To do this, the ''Liber'' collected together earlier sources used to help the abbey evade episcopal control, prior to the abbey becoming a bishopric. These documents may have been forged or had their contents doctored to help the abbey's cause. Because of the tendentious nature of the collection, the work is used by historians with great caution.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' pp. xlix–l Despite the untrustworthy nature of the ''Liber'' and the documents preserved therein, it remains a valuable source for the history of the time period it covers, as well as the internal history of the abbey and bishopric.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' pp. liii–liv The historian Antonia Gransden characterises the ''Liber'' as "valuable for general history", but qualifies by saying that "the whole lacks unity and has errors and confusing repetitions".Gransden ''Historical Writing'' p. 270

Manuscripts

The work survives in two complete manuscripts (MS), that of Trinity College, Cambridge MS O.2.1, usually known as the E manuscript; and one in the possession of Ely Cathedral Chapter, usually known as the F manuscript. The E manuscript dates from the late 12th century, and shows three different scribal hands. The F manuscript dates to the early 13th century, with four scribal hands.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' pp. xxiii–xxiv The E manuscript was given to Trinity College as part of the Gale Collection by Roger Gale in 1738.Staff "Liber Eliensis" ''Trinity Library Catalogue'' The F manuscript has remained at Ely since its creation, and is the only manuscript at Ely still remaining from the medieval monastic library.Owen ''Library and Muniments of Ely Cathedral'' p. 4

As well as the two complete manuscripts, a number of other manuscripts contain parts of the whole work. British Library MS Cotton Titus A.i, usually known as the G manuscript, has part of Book II, and dates from the late 12th or early 13th century. British Library MS Cotton Domitian A.xv, known as the B manuscript, dates from the late 13th or early 14th century and includes some other material along with Book I and the same parts of Book II as in manuscript G. Another Cottonian manuscript, British Library MS Cotton Vespasian A.xix, has parts of Book III, and dates to between 1257 and 1286.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' p. xxv This manuscript is usually known as the A manuscript.Fairweather "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' p. xxv

The relationship between the various extant manuscripts is complex, and a definitive scheme of how the various manuscripts relate to each other cannot be made.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' p. xlii Blake, in his edition of the ''Liber'', suggests that Book I once existed as a stand-alone work, which influenced the B manuscript. A separate Book II, with parts of Book III, was then written and combined with the stand-alone Book I, into either manuscript E or an earlier version of that manuscript. Book II was then revised, combined with parts of G, Book I, and parts of E to make manuscript F.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' p. xlvi

Related manuscripts include Bodleian Library Oxford MS Laud 647, known as the O manuscript. This is based on the ''Liber'', but reorganised into a listing of the acts of the various abbots and bishops and dates from the 14th century. Blake, in his edition of the ''Liber'', calls that and related works the ''Chronicon Abbatum et Episcoporum Eliensium''.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' pp. xxv–xxvi Another related work is contained in Trinity College, Cambridge MS O.2.41, which contains the ''Libellus'' of Æthelwold and an Ely cartulary. Two other related works containing just cartularies are British Library Cotton MS Tiberius A vi and Cambridge University Library Ely Diocesan Register Liber M.

Publication

''Liber Eliensis'' has been published by the Royal Historical Society in its Camden Third Series, edited by E. O. Blake. The edition contains the Latin text along with some Old English texts, but no translation.Royal Historical Society ''Texts and Calendars II'' p. 90 Janet Fairweather has produced a recent English translation of the Latin, published in 2005 by the Boydell Press.Fairweather (ed.) ''Liber Eliensis''

Formerly, only sections of the ''Liber'' had appeared in print, without translations. Parts of the ''Liber'' were edited by D. J. Stewart and published by the Anglia Christiana Society in 1848. Other extracts were published in various works, including parts of Book I that were included in Volume 2 of Jean Mabillon's nine-volume ''Acta Sanctorum'', printed between 1688 and 1701.Blake "Introduction" ''Liber Eliensis'' p. xxviiGraves ''Bibliography of English History'' p. 149 Another set of extracts, mainly consisting of parts of Book II, was compiled by Roger Gale's father Thomas Gale, as part of his ''Historicae Britannicae Scriptores XV'', published at Oxford in 1691.Graves ''Bibliography of English History'' p. 138

Editions

*
*

Notes

Citations

References

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

Further reading

*
*

External links

James Catalogue listing
for the Trinity Library manuscript, E. Includes a digitized copy of the manuscript.


for MS Bodleian Laud Misc 647, the O manuscript

Cotton Titus A.i listing
– British Library catalogue listing for the G manuscript

Domitian A.xv listing
– British Library catalogue listing for the B manuscript

Vespasian A.xix listing
– British Library catalogue listing for the A manuscript

{{DEFAULTSORT:Liber Eliensis
12th-century history books
English chronicles
Historical writing from Norman and Angevin England
Cotton Library
Manuscripts in Cambridge