HOME
        TheInfoList



The was an important administrative and political office in the early modern government of Japan. However, the significance and effectiveness of the office is credited to the third Tokugawa shōgun, Iemitsu, who developed these initial creations as bureaucratic elements in a consistent and coherent whole.

Shogunal deputies during the Kamakura shogunate

The official was the personal representative of the military dictators Oda Nobunaga and Toyotomi Hideyoshi; and it was institutionalized as the representative of the Tokugawa shōguns. The office was similar to the Rokuhara Tandai of the 13th and 14th centuries. ''Tandai'' was the name given to governors or chief magistrates of important cities under the Kamakura shogunate. The office became very important under the Hōjō regents and was always held by a trusted member of the family.Murdoch, James. (1996)
''A History of Japan,'' p. 10 n1.
/ref>

Shogunal deputies during the Tokugawa shogunate

The office was expanded and its duties codified as an office in the Tokugawa shogunate. The ''shoshidai'', usually chosen from among the ''fudai daimyōs'', was the shōgun's deputy in the Kyoto region, and was responsible for maintaining good relations and open communication between the shogunate and the imperial court.Beasley, W. G. (1955). ''Select Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy, 1853–1868,'' p. 325. No less important, this official was also tasked with controlling the access of the ''daimyōs'' to the Court. He was appointed to oversee financial measures and the court, and to ensure the emperor's personal security and for guarding the safety of the court.Brinkley
p. 636.
/ref> For example, the ''shoshidai'' supported the Kyoto magistrate or municipal administrator (the ''machi-bugyō'') in making positive policy about firefighting for the royal palaces. In this context, working with the ''shoshidai'' would have been the administrator of the reigning sovereign's court (the ''kinri-zuki bugyō'') and the administrator of the ex-emperor's court (the ''sendō-zuki bugyō''), both of whom would have been shogunate appointees.Brinkley
p. 589.
/ref> He would have been at the head of a network of spies whose quiet task was to discover and report any covert sources of sedition, insurrection or other kinds of unrest. As Governor-general of Kyoto and the surrounding eight provinces, the ''shoshidai'' was responsible for collecting taxes in the home provinces and for other duties attached to this office as well.Brinkley
p. 637.
/ref> The municipal administrators of Nara and Fushimi, in addition to Kyoto's municipal governance, the Kyoto deputy (the ''daikan''), and the officials of the Nijō Palace were all subordinate to the ''shoshidai.'' He was empowered to hear suits-at-law and he had oversight control of all temples and shrines. The ''shoshidai'' had a force of constables (''yoriki'') and policemen (''dōshin'') under their command. In addition to administrative duties, the ''shoshidais participation in ceremonial events served a function in consolidating the power and influence of the shogunate. For example, in September 1617, a Korean delegation was received by Hidetada at Fushimi Castle, and the ''shoshidai'' was summoned for two reasons (1) for the Koreans, to underscore the importance accorded the embassy, and (2) for the ''kuge'' courtiers in attendance, to make sure that they were properly impressed. To qualify for this high office, it eventually developed that service as governor of Osaka was a prerequisite. The close, personal link with the shōgun was maintained through visits to Edo every five or six years to report directly to the shōgun. The conventional route of promotion was from governor of Osaka (the ''judai'') to the ''shoshidai'' of Kyoto and from that position to the highest governing council (''rōjū''). The ''shusidai'' earned 10,000 ''koku'' annually, in addition to the income from his own daimyoate. In September 1862, a concurrent, nearly co-equal office was created, the "Kyoto ''shugoshoku''", was created in an attempt to strengthen the faction. The ''kōbu-gattai'' were feudal lords and Court nobles who sought a greater share of political power without actually destroying the shogunate, as contrasted with a more radical faction, the , which attracted men like Ōkubo Toshimichi. The related office of the ''shugoshoku'' had essentially the same functions as that of the ''shoshidai,'' but it was considered the senior of the two; and only members of the Matsudaira family were appointed. The last Kyoto ''shoshidai'', Matsudaira Sadaaki, came from a collateral Tokugawa branch. As a practical matter, it could be said that this office ended with his resignation in 1867; but matters were not so unclouded in that time. After the Imperial edict sanctioning the restoration of Imperial government (November 1867), there was a time lag before the office of ''shoshidai'' was abolished (January 1868) and affairs of the city were temporarily entrusted to the clans of Sasayama (Aoyama), Zeze (Honda) and Kameyama (Matsudaira).Ponsonby-Fane, Richard. (1956). ''Kyoto: the Old Capital, 794–1869'', pp. 326–327.

Kyoto ''shoshidai'' of the Edo period



See also

* Bugyō * Rokuhara Tandai

Notes



References

* Bolitho, Harold. (1974). ''Treasures Among Men: The Fudai Daimyo in Tokugawa Japan.'' New Haven: Yale University Press.
OCLC 185685588
* Beasley, W. G. (1955)
''Select Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy, 1853-1868.''
London: Oxford University Press. Reprinted by RoutledgeCurzon, London, 2001. * Brinkley, Frank and Baron Kikuchi. (1915). ''A History of the Japanese People from the Earliest Times to the End of the Meiji Era.'' New York: Encyclopædia Britannica. * Murdoch, James and Isoh Yamagata. (1903–1926). London: Kegan Paul, Trubner
OCLC 502662122
* Nussbaum, Louis Frédéric and Käthe Roth. (2005). ''Japan Encyclopedia.'' Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
OCLC 48943301
* Ponsonby-Fane, Richard. (1956). ''Kyoto: The Old Capital of Japan, 794-1869.'' Kyoto: The Ponsonby Memorial Society. * Toby, Ronald P. (1984). ''State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu.'' Princeton: Princeton University Press.
OCLC 9557347
{{Authority control Category:Officials of the Tokugawa shogunate