The study
The study was a case series with unblinded, unobjective outcomes, not adjusted for confounding factors, nor validated in an independent set of patients. The setting was the coronary care unit of a university hospital in the USA. 250 patients were included in the study (aged 28 to 94; mean 64, 72% male) with a myocardial infarction. Patients with a cardiac arrest prior to admission were excluded. Patients were ranked by Killip class in the following way: * Killip class I includes individuals with no clinical signs of congestive heart failure, heart failure. * Killip class II includes individuals with rales or crackles in the lungs, an S3, and elevated jugular venous pressure. * Killip class III describes individuals with frank acute pulmonary edema. * Killip class IV describes individuals in cardiogenic shock or hypotension (measured as systolic blood pressure lower than 90 mmHg), and evidence of peripheral vasoconstriction (oliguria, cyanosis or sweating).Conclusions
The numbers below were accurate in 1967. Nowadays, they have diminished by 30 to 50% in every class. Within a 95% confidence interval the patient outcome was as follows: The Killip-Kimball classification has played a fundamental role in classic cardiology, having been used as a stratifying criterion for many other studies. Worsening Killip class has been found to be independently associated with increasing mortality in several studies. Killip class 1 and no evidence of hypotension or bradycardia, in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, should be considered for immediate intravenous, IV beta blocker, beta blockade.References
{{reflist Diagnostic cardiology