INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING (IPO) or STOCK MARKET LAUNCH is a type of public offering in which shares of a company usually are sold to institutional investors that in turn, sell to the general public, on a securities exchange , for the first time. Through this process, a privately held company transforms into a public company . Initial public offerings are mostly used by companies to raise the expansion of capital, possibly to monetize the investments of early private investors, and to become publicly traded enterprises. A company selling shares is never required to repay the capital to its public investors. After the IPO, when shares trade freely in the open market, money passes between public investors. Although IPO offers many advantages, there are also significant disadvantages, chief among these are the costs associated with the process and the requirement to disclose certain information that could prove helpful to competitors. The IPO process is colloquially known as _going public_.
Details of the proposed offering are disclosed to potential purchasers in the form of a lengthy document known as a prospectus . Most companies undertake an IPO with the assistance of an investment banking firm acting in the capacity of an underwriter . Underwriters provide several services, including help with correctly assessing the value of shares (share price) and establishing a public market for shares (initial sale). Alternative methods such as the dutch auction have also been explored. In terms of size and public participation, the two most notable examples of this method is the Google IPO and Snapchat's parent company Snap Inc. China has recently emerged as a major IPO market, with several of the largest IPOs taking place in that country.
* 1 History
* 2 Advantages and disadvantages
* 2.1 Advantages * 2.2 Disadvantages
* 3 Procedure
* 3.1 Advance planning * 3.2 Retention of underwriters * 3.3 Allocation and pricing
* 3.4 Pricing
* 3.4.1 Dutch auction
* 3.5 Quiet period * 3.6 Delivery of shares * 3.7 Stag profit (flipping)
* 4 Largest IPOs * 5 Largest IPO markets * 6 See also * 7 References * 8 Further reading * 9 External links
The earliest form of a company which issued _public shares_ was the
case of the _publicani_ during the
In the early modern period, the Dutch were financial innovators who
helped lay the foundations of modern financial system. The first
modern IPO occurred in March 1602 when the Dutch East India Company
offered shares of the company to the public in order to raise capital.
Dutch East India Company
In the United States, the first IPO was the public offering of Bank of North America around 1783.
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
When a company lists its securities on a public exchange , the money paid by the investing public for then newly issued shares goes directly to the company (primary offering) as well as to any early private investors who opt to sell all or a portion of their holdings (secondary offering) as part of the larger IPO. An IPO, therefore, allows a company to tap into a wide pool of potential investors to provide itself with capital for future growth, repayment of debt, or working capital. A company selling common shares is never required to repay the capital to its public investors. Those investors must endure the unpredictable nature of the open market to price and trade their shares. After the IPO, when shares trade freely in the open market, money passes between public investors. For early private investors who choose to sell shares as part of the IPO process, the IPO represents an opportunity to monetize their investment. After the IPO, once shares trade in the open market, investors holding large blocks of shares can either sell those shares piecemeal in the open market, or sell a large block of shares directly to the public, at a fixed price, through a secondary market offering . This type of offering is not dilutive, since no new shares are being created.
Once a company is listed, it is able to issue additional common shares in a number of different ways, one of which is the follow-on offering . This method provides capital for various corporate purposes through the issuance of equity (see stock dilution ) without incurring any debt. This ability to quickly raise potentially large amounts of capital from the marketplace is a key reason many companies seek to go public.
An IPO accords several benefits to the previously private company:
* Enlarging and diversifying equity base * Enabling cheaper access to capital * Increasing exposure, prestige, and public image * Attracting and retaining better management and employees through liquid equity participation * Facilitating acquisitions (potentially in return for shares of stock) * Creating multiple financing opportunities: equity, convertible debt, cheaper bank loans, etc.
There are several disadvantages to completing an initial public offering:
* Significant legal, accounting and marketing costs, many of which are ongoing * Requirement to disclose financial and business information * Meaningful time, effort and attention required of management * Risk that required funding will not be raised * Public dissemination of information which may be useful to competitors, suppliers and customers. * Loss of control and stronger agency problems due to new shareholders * Increased risk of litigation, including private securities class actions and shareholder derivative actions
The launch by eDreams (Europe's largest independent online travel agency) illustrates some of the risks involved in an IPO.
Independent Board Member James Hare (James Otis Hare II) oversaw the company's public launch on 4 April 2014.
eDreams offered its stock at 10.25 Euros per share.
That stock price had fallen to 1.02 Euros by 24 October 2014, wiping out around one billion Euros of market capitalization.
Some commentators called the launch “Europe’s worst performing IPO of 2014”.
eDreams moved quickly, asking their shareholders for authorization to “Discharge to Mr. James Otis Hare for the exercise of his mandate as director of the Company until his resignation as of 25 March, 2015.”
eDreams issued the following announcement: “Effective March 25, 2015, eDreams ODIGEO (“the Company”) accepts the resignation of Mr. James Hare as an Independent member from the Board of Directors”.
In June 2015, CEO Dana Dunne introduced a new strategy focusing on mobile, revenue diversification and customer experience improvements, which led to a strong turnaround in business performance.
Dunne's new strategy caused that stock price to rise above 3 euros by January 2017.
But it had been a tough lesson for the company, and a warning of the dangers inherent in any IPO.
IPO procedures are governed by different laws in different countries. In the United States, IPOs are regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 . In the United Kingdom, the UK Listing Authority reviews and approves prospectuses and operates the listing regime.
Planning is crucial to a successful IPO. One book suggests the following 7 advance planning steps:
* develop an impressive management and professional team * grow the company's business with an eye to the public marketplace * obtain audited financial statements using IPO-accepted accounting principles * clean up the company's act * establish antitakeover defences * develop good corporate governance * create insider bail-out opportunities and take advantage of IPO windows.
RETENTION OF UNDERWRITERS
IPOs generally involve one or more investment banks known as "underwriters ". The company offering its shares, called the "issuer", enters into a contract with a lead underwriter to sell its shares to the public. The underwriter then approaches investors with offers to sell those shares.
A large IPO is usually underwritten by a "syndicate " of investment banks, the largest of which take the position of "lead underwriter". Upon selling the shares, the underwriters retain a portion of the proceeds as their fee. This fee is called an underwriting spread . The spread is calculated as a discount from the price of the shares sold (called the gross spread ). Components of an underwriting spread in an initial public offering (IPO) typically include the following (on a per share basis): Manager's fee, Underwriting fee—earned by members of the syndicate, and the Concession—earned by the broker-dealer selling the shares. The Manager would be entitled to the entire underwriting spread. A member of the syndicate is entitled to the underwriting fee and the concession. A broker dealer who is not a member of the syndicate but sells shares would receive only the concession, while the member of the syndicate who provided the shares to that broker dealer would retain the underwriting fee. Usually, the managing/lead underwriter, also known as the bookrunner , typically the underwriter selling the largest proportions of the IPO, takes the highest portion of the gross spread , up to 8% in some cases.
Multinational IPOs may have many syndicates to deal with differing legal requirements in both the issuer's domestic market and other regions. For example, an issuer based in the E.U. may be represented by the main selling syndicate in its domestic market, Europe, in addition to separate syndicates or selling groups for US/Canada and for Asia. Usually, the lead underwriter in the main selling group is also the lead bank in the other selling groups.
Because of the wide array of legal requirements and because it is an expensive process, IPOs also typically involve one or more law firms with major practices in securities law , such as the Magic Circle firms of London and the white shoe firms of New York City.
Financial historians Richard Sylla and Robert E. Wright have shown that before 1860 most early U.S. corporations sold shares in themselves directly to the public without the aid of intermediaries like investment banks. The direct public offering or DPO, as they term it, was not done by auction but rather at a share price set by the issuing corporation. In this sense, it is the same as the fixed price public offers that were the traditional IPO method in most non-US countries in the early 1990s. The DPO eliminated the agency problem associated with offerings intermediated by investment banks. There has recently been a movement based on crowd funding to revive the popularity of Direct Public Offerings.
ALLOCATION AND PRICING
The sale (allocation and pricing) of shares in an IPO may take several forms. Common methods include:
Public offerings are sold to both institutional investors and retail clients of the underwriters. A licensed securities salesperson ( Registered Representative in the USA and Canada) selling shares of a public offering to his clients is paid a portion of the selling concession (the fee paid by the issuer to the underwriter) rather than by his client. In some situations, when the IPO is not a "hot" issue (undersubscribed), and where the salesperson is the client's advisor, it is possible that the financial incentives of the advisor and client may not be aligned.
The issuer usually allows the underwriters an option to increase the size of the offering by up to 15% under certain circumstance known as the greenshoe or overallotment option. This option is always exercised when the offering is considered a "hot" issue, by virtue of being oversubscribed.
The Final step in preparing and filing the final IPO prospectus is for the issuer to retain one of the major financial "printers", who print (and today, also electronically file with the SEC ) the registration statement on Form S-1. Typically, preparation of the final prospectus is actually performed at the printer, where in one of their multiple conference rooms the issuer, issuer's counsel (attorneys), underwriter's counsel (attorneys), the lead underwriter(s), and the issuer's accountants/auditors make final edits and proofreading, concluding with the filing of the final prospectus by the financial printer with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Before legal actions initiated by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer , which later became known as the Global Settlement enforcement agreement, some large investment firms had initiated favorable research coverage of companies in an effort to aid corporate finance departments and retail divisions engaged in the marketing of new issues. The central issue in that enforcement agreement had been judged in court previously. It involved the conflict of interest between the investment banking and analysis departments of ten of the largest investment firms in the United States. The investment firms involved in the settlement had all engaged in actions and practices that had allowed the inappropriate influence of their research analysts by their investment bankers seeking lucrative fees. A typical violation addressed by the settlement was the case of CSFB and Salomon Smith Barney , which were alleged to have engaged in inappropriate spinning of "hot" IPOs and issued fraudulent research reports in violation of various sections within the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 .
A company planning an IPO typically appoints a lead manager, known as a bookrunner , to help it arrive at an appropriate price at which the shares should be issued. There are two primary ways in which the price of an IPO can be determined. Either the company, with the help of its lead managers, fixes a price ("fixed price method"), or the price can be determined through analysis of confidential investor demand data compiled by the bookrunner ("book building ").
Historically, many IPOs have been underpriced. The effect of underpricing an IPO is to generate additional interest in the stock when it first becomes publicly traded. Flipping , or quickly selling shares for a profit, can lead to significant gains for investors who were allocated shares of the IPO at the offering price. However, underpricing an IPO results in lost potential capital for the issuer. One extreme example is theglobe.com IPO which helped fuel the IPO "mania" of the late 1990s internet era. Underwritten by Bear Stearns on 13 November 1998, the IPO was priced at $9 per share. The share price quickly increased 1000% on the opening day of trading, to a high of $97. Selling pressure from institutional flipping eventually drove the stock back down, and it closed the day at $63. Although the company did raise about $30 million from the offering, it is estimated that with the level of demand for the offering and the volume of trading that took place they might have left upwards of $200 million on the table.
Underwriters, therefore, take many factors into consideration when pricing an IPO, and attempt to reach an offering price that is low enough to stimulate interest in the stock, but high enough to raise an adequate amount of capital for the company. When pricing an IPO, underwriters use a variety of key performance indicators and non-GAAP measures. The process of determining an optimal price usually involves the underwriters ("syndicate") arranging share purchase commitments from leading institutional investors.
Some researchers (Friesen & Swift, 2009) believe that the underpricing of IPOs is less a deliberate act on the part of issuers and/or underwriters, and more the result of an over-reaction on the part of investors (Friesen -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;">
* ^ Note: the price the company receives from the institutional
investors is the IPO price
* ^ Edmonston, Peter. (19 August 2009) Google\'s I.P.O., Five Years
Later – NYTimes.com. Dealbook.nytimes.com. Retrieved on 2012-10-16.
* ^ "4 Major Risks To Note When Snap Begins Trading On Thursday".
Investing.com. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
* ^ "China IPO market". Retrieved 21 April 2016.
* ^ "Books & Reading: Chapter One". Retrieved 27 November 2016.
* ^ Goetzmann, William N.; Rouwenhorst, K. Geert (2005). _The
Origins of Value: The Financial Innovations that Created Modern
Capital Markets_. (Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0195175714 ))
* ^ Goetzmann, William N.; Rouwenhorst, K. Geert (2008). _The
History of Financial Innovation_, in _Carbon Finance, Environmental
Market Solutions to Climate Change_. (Yale School of Forestry and
Environmental Studies, chapter 1, pp. 18–43). As Goetzmann &
Rouwenhorst (2008) noted, "The 17th and 18th centuries in the
Netherlands were a remarkable time for finance. Many of the financial
products or instruments that we see today emerged during a relatively
short period. In particular, merchants and bankers developed what we
would today call securitization . Mutual funds and various other forms
of structured finance that still exist today emerged in the 17th and
18th centuries in Holland."
* ^ Stringham, Edward Peter : _Private Governance: Creating Order
in Economic and Social Life_. (Oxford University Press, 2015, ISBN
9780199365166 ), p.42
* ^ "Exhibits — America\'s First IPO — Museum of American
Finance". Moaf.org. Retrieved 12 July 2012.
* ^ Rose Selden, Shannon; Goodman, Mark. "The Shift in Litigation
Risks When U.S. Companies Go Public". Transaction Advisors. ISSN
* ^ "HECHO RELEVANTE" (PDF). _Edreamsodigeo.com_. Retrieved 16
* ^ "After IPO, eDreams Odigeo shares plummet 75% in 5 months".
Tech.eu. 11 September 2014. Retrieved 7 September 2016.
* ^ "EDR:SM". _Bloomberg.com_. 9 June 2016. Retrieved 7 September
* ^ "Down 60%, eDreams Odigeo shares try to escape post-IPO
nightmare". _Tnooz.com_. 29 August 2014. Retrieved 7 September 2016.
* ^ "eDreams Odigeo strategy begins to pay off". _Tnooz_. Retrieved
16 June 2016.
* ^ "The Laws That Govern the Securities Industry". Securities and
Exchange Commission. Retrieved 12 December 2014.
* ^ "UK Listing Authority". Retrieved 12 December 2014.
* ^ Lipman, International and U.S. IPO Planning, ISBN
* ^ _Series 79 Investment Banking Representative Qualification
Examination, Study Manual, 41st Edition_. Securities Trading
* ^ Robert E. Wright, "Reforming the U.S. IPO Market: Lessons from
History and Theory", _Accounting, Business, and Financial History_
(November 2002), 419–437.
Robert E. Wright and Richard Sylla, "Corporate Governance and
Stockholder/Stakeholder Activism in the United States, 1790–1860:
New Data and Perspectives". In Jonathan Koppell (ed.), _Origins of
Shareholder Advocacy_ (New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2011), 231–51.
* ^ "Equity Crowdfunding
* Gregoriou, Greg (2006). _Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)_. Butterworth-Heineman, an imprint of Elsevier. ISBN 0-7506-7975-1 . * Goergen, M.; Khurshed, A.; Mudambi, R. (2007). "The Long-run Performance of UK IPOs: Can it be Predicted?". _Managerial Finance_. 33 (6): 401–419. doi :10.1108/03074350710748759 . * Loughran, T.; Ritter, J. R. (2004). "Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?" (PDF). _Financial Management_. 33 (3): 5–37. * Loughran, T.; Ritter, J. R. (2002). "Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in IPOs?". _Review of Financial Studies_. 15 (2): 413–443. doi :10.1093/rfs/15.2.413 . * Khurshed, A.; Mudambi, R. (2002). "The Short Run Price Performance of Investment Trust IPOs on the UK Main Market". _Applied Financial Economics_. 12 (10): 697–706. doi :10.1080/09603100010025706 . * Bradley, D. J.; Jordan, B. D.; Ritter, J. R. (2003). "The Quiet Period Goes Out with a Bang". _Journal of Finance_. 58 (1): 1–36. doi :10.1111/1540-6261.00517 . * Goergen, M.; Khurshed, A.; Mudambi, R. (2006). "The Strategy of Going Public: How UK Firms Choose Their Listing Contracts". _Journal of Business Finance and Accounting_. 33 (1&2): 306–328. SSRN 886408 _. * Mudambi, R.; Treichel, M. Z. (2005). "Cash Crisis in Newly Public Internet-based Firms: An Empirical Analysis". Journal of Business Venturing_. 20 (4): 543–571. doi :10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.03.003 .