Ideomotor phenomenon

The ideomotor phenomenon is a psychological phenomenon wherein a subject makes motions unconsciously. Also called ideomotor response (or ideomotor reflex) and abbreviated to IMR, it is a concept in hypnosis and psychological research. It is derived from the terms "ideo" (idea, or mental representation) and "motor" (muscular action). The phrase is most commonly used in reference to the process whereby a thought or mental image brings about a seemingly "reflexive" or automatic muscular reaction, often of minuscule degree, and potentially outside of the awareness of the subject. As in responses to pain, the body sometimes reacts reflexively with an ideomotor effect to ideas alone without the person consciously deciding to take action. The effects of automatic writing, dowsing, facilitated communication, applied kinesiology, and ouija boards have been attributed to the phenomenon.

The associated term "ideo-''dynamic'' response" (or "reflex") applies to a wider domain, and extends to the description of all bodily reactions (including ideo-motor and ideo-sensory responses) caused in a similar manner by certain ideas, e.g., the salivation often caused by imagining sucking a lemon, which is a secretory response. The notion of an ideo-dynamic response contributed to James Braid's first neuropsychological explanation of the principle through which suggestion operated in hypnotism.

History of scientific investigation

With the rise of Spiritualism in 1840s, mediums devised and refined a variety of techniques for communicating, ostensibly, with the spirit world including table-turning and planchette writing boards (the precursor to later Ouija boards). These phenomena and devices quickly became the subject of scientific investigation.

The term Ideomotor was first used in a scientific paper discussing the means through which these spiritualistic phenomena produced effect, by William Benjamin Carpenter in 1852, hence the alternative term "Carpenter effect". Carpenter derived the word ''ideomotor'' from the components ''ideo'', meaning "idea" or "mental representation", and ''motor'', meaning "muscular action". In the paper, Carpenter explained his theory that muscular movement can be independent of conscious desires or emotions.

Carpenter was a friend and collaborator of James Braid, the founder of modern hypnotism. Braid soon adopted Carpenter's ideo-motor terminology, to facilitate the transmission of his most fundamental views, based upon those of his teacher, the philosopher Thomas Brown, that the efficacy of hypnotic suggestion was contingent upon the subject's concentration upon a single (thus, "dominant") idea. In 1855, Braid explained his decision to abandon his earlier term "mono-ideo-motor", based on Carpenter's (1852) "ideo-motor principle", and adopt the more appropriate and more descriptive term "mono-ideo-dynamic". His decision was based upon suggestions made to Carpenter (in 1854) by their friend in common, Daniel Noble, that the activity that Carpenter was describing would be more accurately understood in its wider applications (viz., wider than pendulums and ouija boards) if it were to denominated the "ideo-dynamic principle":

In order that I may do full justice to two esteemed friends, I beg to state, in connection with this term ''monoideo-dynamics'', that, several years ago, Dr. W. B. Carpenter introduced the term ''ideo-motor'' to characterise the reflex or automatic muscular motions which arise merely from ideas associated with motion existing in the mind, without any conscious effort of volition. In 1853, in referring to this term, Daniel Noble said, "''Ideo-dynamic'' would probably constitute a phraseology more appropriate, as applicable to a wider range of phenomena." In this opinion I quite concurred, because I was well aware that an idea could ''arrest'' as well as ''excite'' motion automatically, not only in the muscles of voluntary motion, but also as regards the condition of ''every other function of the body''. I have, therefore, adopted the term ''monoideo-dynamics'', as still more comprehensive and characteristic as regards the true mental relations which subsist during all dynamic changes which take place, in every other function of the body, as well as in the muscles of voluntary motion.

Scientific tests by the English scientist Michael Faraday, Manchester surgeon James Braid, the French chemist Michel Eugène Chevreul, and the American psychologists William James and Ray Hyman have demonstrated that many phenomena attributed to spiritual or paranormal forces, or to mysterious "energies", are actually due to ideomotor action. Furthermore, these tests demonstrate that "honest, intelligent people can unconsciously engage in muscular activity that is consistent with their expectations". They also show that suggestions that can guide behavior can be given by subtle clues (Hyman 1977).

Some operators claim to use ideomotor responses to communicate with a subject's "unconscious mind" using a system of physical signals (such as finger movements) for the unconscious mind to indicate "yes", "no", "I don't know", or "I'm not ready to know that consciously".

A simple experiment to demonstrate the ideomotor effect is to allow a hand-held pendulum to hover over a sheet of paper. The paper has words such as "yes", "no", and "maybe" printed on it. Small movements in the hand, in response to questions, can cause the pendulum to move towards the words on the paper. This technique has been used for experiments in extrasensory perception, lie detection, and ouija boards. This type of experiment was used by Kreskin and has also been used by illusionists such as Derren Brown.
* A 2019 study of automatic pendulum movements using a motion capture system showed that pendulum effect is produced when the fingers holding the pendulum generate an oscillating frequency close to the resonant frequency of the pendulum. At an appropriate frequency, very small driving movements of the arm are sufficient to produce relatively large pendulum motion.

Uses

Responding to questions

It is strongly associated with the practice of analytical hypnotherapy based on "uncovering techniques" such as Watkins' "affect bridge", whereby a subject's "yes", "no", "I don't know", or "I don't want to answer" responses to an operator's questions are indicated by physical movements rather than verbal signals; and are produced ''per medium'' of a pre-determined (between operator and subject) and pre-calibrated set of responses.LeCron, (1954).

See also

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

Footnotes

References

* Anderson, J.W., "Defensive Maneuvers In Two Incidents Involving The Chevreul Pendulum: A Clinical Note", ''International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis'', Vol. XXV, No. 1, (1977), pp. 4–6.
* Braid, J., "Mysterious Table Moving", ''The Manchester Examiner and Times'', Vol. 5, No. 469, (Saturday, 30 April 1853), p. 5, col.B.
* Braid, J., ''Hypnotic Therapeutics, Illustrated by Cases: With an Appendix on Table-Moving and Spirit-Rapping. Reprinted from the Monthly Journal of Medical Science for July 1853'', Murray and Gibbs, (Edinburgh), 1853.
* Braid, J., "Letter to Michael Faraday on the phenomenon of "Table Turning" ritten on 22 August 1853, reprinted at pp. 560–561 of James, F.A.J.L., ''The Correspondence of Michael Faraday, Volume 4: January 1849 – October 1855'', Institution of Electrical Engineers, (London), 1999.
* Braid, J., ''The Physiology of Fascination, and the Critics Criticised'', John Murray, (Manchester), 1855.
* Carpenter, W.B., "On the Influence of Suggestion in Modifying and directing Muscular Movement, independently of Volition",
Royal Institution of Great Britain, (Proceedings), 1852
', (12 March 1852), pp. 147–153.
* Carroll, R.T. (2003)
"Ideomotor effect"
''The Skeptic's Dictionary''.
* Cheek, D.B., "Some Applications of Hypnosis and Ideomotor Questioning Methods for Analysis and Therapy in Medicine", ''American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis'', Vol. 5, No. 2, (October 1962), pp. 92–104.
* Cheuvrel. Michel E.
''De la Baguette Divinatoire et du Pendule Dit Explorateur'' (On the Divining Rod and the So-called Exploratory Pendulum), Maillet-Bachelier, Paris, 1854.
*
*
*
*
* Faraday, M., "Experimental Investigation of Table-Moving", ''Athenaeum'', No. 1340, (July 1853), pp. 801–803.
* Faraday, M., "Table-Turning", ''The Times'', No. 21468, (30 June 1853), p. 8.
*
*
*
*
* Noble, D.
"Three Lectures on the Correlation of Psychology and Physiology: I. General Remarks on the Physiology of the Brain and Nervous System, etc.", Association Medical Journal, Vol. 3, No. 79, (7 July 1854), pp. 586–588"II. Of Emotional Sensibility, and its Reactions", No. 80, (14 July 1854), pp. 615–616"III. On Ideas, and Their Dynamic Influence ", No. 81, (21 July 1854), pp. 642–646.
*
*
* Shenefelt, Philip D., "Ideomotor Signaling: From Divining Spiritual Messages to Discerning Subconscious Answers during Hypnosis and Hypnoanalysis, a Historical Perspective", ''American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis'', Vol. 53, No. 3, (January 2011), pp. 157–167.
* Spitz, H.H. & Marcuard, Y., "Chevreul's Report on the Mysterious Oscillations of the Hand-Held Pendulum: A French Chemist's 1833 Open Letter to Ampère", ''The Skeptical Inquirer'', (July/August 2001) Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 35–39.
*

Sudduth, W.X., "Suggestion as an Ideo-Dynamic Force", pp. 255–262 in Anon, ''Bulletin of the Medico-Legal Congress: Held at the Federal Building in the City of New York, September 4, 5th, and 6th, 1895, Medico-Legal Journal for Medico-Legal Society'', (New York), 1895.
*

Yeates, L.B., ''James Braid: Surgeon, Gentleman Scientist, and Hypnotist'', Ph.D. Dissertation, School of History and Philosophy of Science, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, January 2013.
{{refend

Human physiology
Hypnosis
Phenomena
Parapsychology