Icelandic phonology

Unlike many languages, Icelandic has only very minor dialectal differences in sounds. The language has both monophthongs and diphthongs, and many consonants can be voiced or unvoiced.

Icelandic has an aspiration contrast between plosives, rather than a voicing contrast, similar to Faroese, Danish and Standard Mandarin. Preaspirated voiceless stops are also common. However, fricative and sonorant consonant phonemes exhibit regular contrasts in voice, including in nasals (rare in the world's languages). Additionally, length is contrastive for consonants, but not vowels. In Icelandic, the main stress is always on the first syllable.

Consonants

The number and nature of the consonant phonemes in modern Icelandic is subject to broad disagreement, due to a complex relationship among consonant allophones.

Major allophones

Even the number of major allophones is subject to some dispute, although less than for phonemes. The following is a chart of potentially contrastive '' phones'' (important phonetic distinctions which minimally contrast in some positions with known phonemes; ''not'' a chart of actual phonemes), according to one analysis :

:

* are alveolar , whereas are dental .
* is an apical alveolar sibilant fricative,, cited in whereas are alveolar non-sibilant fricatives . The former is laminal, while the latter is usually apical. They are broadly transcribed with , which nominally denote dental fricatives.
* Voiceless continuants are always constrictive , but voiced continuants are not very constrictive and are often closer to approximants than fricatives . ( in particular is equivalent to canonical , but and its allophones are not a rhotic consonant in Icelandic.)
* The rhotic consonants may either be trills or taps , depending on the speaker.
* Acoustic analysis reveals that the voiceless lateral approximant is, in practice, usually realized with considerable frication, especially word-finally or syllable-finally, i. e., essentially as a voiceless alveolar lateral fricative .
* ⟨ll⟩ is pronounced as .

includes three extra phones, namely the glottal stop , voiceless velarized alveolar lateral approximant and its voiced counterpart .

A large number of competing analyses have been proposed for Icelandic phonemes. The problems stem from complex but regular alternations and mergers among the above phones in various positions.

Alternations

Examples of alternations across different positions:

*: ''tæp'' ('uncertain' ), ''tæpt'' ('uncertain' )
*: ''grafa'' ('to dig'); ''grafta'' ('of diggings'); ''grafna'' ('dug')
*: ''segi'' (' say'), ''sagt'' (' assaid'), ''sagði'' (' said'), ''sagna'' ('of stories')

Voiced consonants are devoiced word-finally before a pause, so that ''dag'' ('day (acc.)') is pronounced , ''bauð'' ('bid (1/3 pers. sg. past)') is pronounced , and ''gaf'' ('gave (1/3 pers. sg.)') is pronounced . Even sonorants can be affected: ''dagur'' ('day (nom.sg.)'), ''ketil'' ('kettle (acc.)')

Restrictions

Dorsal consonants (velar, palatal, glottal)

The "glottal fricative" (actually a placeless approximant) only occurs initially before a vowel, and following a vowel in the sequences . These latter sequences are sometimes said to be unitary "pre-aspirated" stops; see below.

The voiceless velar fricative occurs only between a vowel and or , and initially as a variant of before . Because it does not contrast with in either position, it can be seen as an allophone of . However, it also alternates with , occurring before a pause where would be pronounced otherwise.

There are two sets of palatal sounds. "Alternating palatals" alternate with the velars , while "non-alternating palatals" do not. Note that appears twice here; these two 's behave differently, occur in different distributions, and are denoted by different letters (''g'' and ''j''). This suggests that they may belong to different phonemes, and that is indeed a common analysis.

In general, the alternating palatals are restricted to appearing before vowels. Velars are restricted to appearing everywhere except before front vowels. In other words: Before back vowels and front rounded vowels, both palatals and velars can appear; before front unrounded vowels only palatals can appear; before consonants only velars can appear.

For the non-alternating palatals : Both can appear at the beginning of a word, followed by a vowel. Elsewhere, only one can occur, which must occur after a non-velar, non-palatal consonant. occurs before a vowel, and occurs in a few words at the end of a word following .

The velars and alternating palatals are distributed as follows:
*Initially or at beginning of syllable: Only the four stops can appear.
*After that begins a syllable: only .
*Between vowels: only .
*After a vowel, finally or before or : only .
*After a vowel, before : only .
*After a vowel, before : only .
*After a vowel, before nasals: only .
*After a vowel, before : only .

Although the facts are complex, it can be noticed that only ever contrasts with one of the two velar stops, never with both, and hence can be taken as an allophone of whichever one doesn't appear in a given context. Alternatively, following the orthography, can be taken as an allophone of , where is taken as an allophone of either or depending on context, following the orthography.

Alveolar non-sibilant fricatives

In native vocabulary, the fricatives and are allophones of a single phoneme . is used morpheme-initially, as in ''þak'' ('roof'), and before a voiceless consonant, as in ''maðkur'' ('worm'). is used intervocalically, as in ''iða'' ('vortex') and word-finally, as in ''bað'' ('bath'), although it is devoiced to before pause. Some loanwords (mostly from Classical Greek) have introduced the phone in intervocalic environments, as in ''Aþena'' ('Athens').

The phone is actually a laminal voiceless alveolar non-sibilant fricative . The corresponding voiced phone is similar, but is apical rather than laminal .

Voiceless sonorants

Of the voiceless sonorants , only occur in word-initial position, for example in ''hné'' ('knee'). Only in initial position do the voiceless sonorants contrast with the corresponding voiced sonorants. Finally, before aspirated consonants and after voiceless consonants only the voiceless sonorants appear; elsewhere, only the voiced sonorants appear. This makes it clear that are non-phonemic. Recently, there has been an increasing tendency, especially among children, to pronounce initial ''hn'' as voiced, e.g. ''hnífur'' ('knife') rather than standard .

Palatal and velar nasals

The palatal nasals appear before palatal stops and the velar nasals before velar stops; in these positions, the alveolar nasals do not occur. appears also before , and through the deletion of in the consonant clusters , and through the coalescence of the consonants and in the consonant clusters . The palatal nasals are clearly non-phonemic, although there is some debate about due to the common deletion and coalescence of .

Aspiration and length contrasts (medial and final)

Modern Icelandic is often said to have a rare kind of stops, the so-called ''pre-aspirated stops'' (e.g. ''löpp'' 'foot'), which occur only after a vowel and do not contrast with sequences (which do not occur in Icelandic). note that phonetically, in Icelandic pre-aspirated stops the aspiration is longer than in normal post-aspirated stops, and is indistinguishable from sequences (or with replacing ) occurring in other languages; hence, they prefer to analyze the pre-aspirated stops as sequences. For example, Icelandic ''nótt'', ''dóttir'' correspond to German ''Nacht'', ''Tochter''.

Following vowels there is a complex alternation among consonant length, vowel length and aspiration. The following table shows the alternations in medial and final position :

:

In most analyses, consonant length is seen as phonemic while vowel length is seen as determined entirely by environment, with long vowels occurring in stressed syllables before single consonants and before certain sequences formed of a consonant plus , and short vowels occurring elsewhere. Note that diphthongs also occur long and short.

Phonemes

As discussed above, the phones , probably , and debatably are non-phonemic. Beyond this, there is a great deal of debate both about the number and identity of the phonemes in Icelandic and the mapping between phonemes and allophones.

There are a number of different approaches:

Phonetic vs. orthographic:

#The "phonetic" approach. This approach tries to stay as close as possible to the phonetics. This would assume, for example, that and should be consistently analyzed in all contexts as phonemic and , respectively (or perhaps as an archiphoneme in positions where the two do not contrast), and that is a phonemic sequence (or possibly a unitary pre-aspirated ).
#The "orthographic" approach (e.g. ). This approach takes the orthography (i.e. the spelling) as approximately indicative of the underlying phonemes. This approach generally assumes, for example, phonemes and which occur in accordance with the orthography (i.e. where written ''k'', where written ''g''), where has allophones , and depending on the context, and has allophones , and . is analyzed as or , while is analyzed as , again consistent with the orthography. A variant would assume that and merge into an archiphoneme in contexts where the two cannot be distinguished, e.g. before or , where both would be pronounced . Note that in this approach, a particular phone will often be an allophone of different phonemes depending on context; e.g. would be taken as initially, but between vowels.

Maximalist vs. minimalist:

#The "maximalist" approach. This approach generally takes the contrasting phones as unit phonemes unless there is a good reason not to. This would assume, for example, that the palatal stops , voiceless sonorants and perhaps the velar nasal are separate phonemes, at least in positions where they cannot be analyzed as allophones of other unitary phonemes (e.g. initially for the voiceless sonorants, before and for the velar nasal).
#The "minimalist" approach. This approach analyzes phones as clusters whenever possible, in order to reduce the number of phonemes and (in some cases) better account for alternations. This would assume, for example, that the palatal stops, voiceless sonorants and velar nasal are phonemic clusters, in accordance with the orthography. In structuralist analyses, which passed out of vogue starting in the 1960s as generative approaches took off, even more extreme minimalist approaches were common. An example is . Although he presents more than one analysis, the most minimal analysis not only accepts all the clusters indicated in the orthography, but also analyzes the aspirates as sequences , , (or , , depending on how the non-aspirate stops are analyzed) and reduces all vowels and diphthongs down to a set of 6 vowels.

The main advantage of the phonetic approach is its simplicity compared with the orthographic approach. A major disadvantage, however, is that it results in a large number of unexplained lexical and grammatical alternations. Under the orthographic approach, for example (especially if a minimalist approach is also adopted), all words with the root ''sag-/seg-'' ('say') have a phonemic , despite the varying phones occurring in different lexical and inflectional forms, and similarly all words with the root ''sak-'' ('blame') have a phonemic , despite the varying phones . Under the phonetic approach, however, the phonemes would vary depending on the context in complicated and seemingly arbitrary ways. Similarly, an orthographic analysis of three words for "white", ''hvítur'' ''hvít'' ''hvítt'' ( sg, sg, ) as allows for a simple analysis of the forms as a root plus endings and successfully explains the surface alternation , which would not be possible in a strictly phonetic approach.

Assuming a basically orthographic approach, the set of phonemes in Icelandic is as follows:

:

The parentheses indicate phonemes present in a maximalist analysis but not a minimalist analysis.

There is a particular amount of debate over the status of and . A maximalist analysis sees them as separate phonemes (e.g. and , respectively), while in a minimalist analysis they are allophones of and before front unrounded vowels, and of the sequences and before rounded vowels, in accordance with the orthography. The maximalist approach accords with the presence of minimal pairs like ''gjóla'' ('light wind') vs. ''góla'' ('howl') and ''kjóla'' ('dresses') vs. ''kóla'' ('cola'), along with general speakers' intuitions. However, the minimalist approach (e.g. ) accounts for some otherwise unexplained gaps in the system (e.g. the absence of palatal/velar contrasts except before rounded vowels, and the absence of phonetic after velars and palatals), as well as otherwise unexplained alternations between palatals and velars in e.g. ''segi'' (' say') vs. ''sagði'' (' said'; assuming that and are taken as allophones of palatal and velar stops, respectively). On the other hand, the number of such alternations is not as great as for stop vs. fricative alternations; most lexical items consistently have either velars or palatals.

The voiceless sonorants are straightforwardly taken as allophones of voiced sonorants in most positions, because of lack of any contrast; similarly for vs. . On the other hand, do contrast with in initial position, suggesting that they may be phonemes in this position, consistent with a maximalist analysis. A minimalist analysis, however, would note the restricted distribution of these phonemes, the lack of contrast in this position with sequences and the fact that similar sequences do occur, and analyze as , in accordance with the orthography.

The velar nasal is clearly an allophone of before a velar stop. When it occurs before or as a result of deletion of an intervening , however, some scholars analyze it as a phoneme , while others analyze it as a sequence, e.g. .

Vowels

There is less disagreement over the vowel phonemes in Icelandic than the consonant phonemes. The Old Icelandic vowel system involving phonemic length was transformed to the modern system where phonetic length is automatically determined by the syllable structure. In the process of eliminating vowel length, however, relatively few vowel distinctions have been lost, as the loss of phonemic length has been offset by an increase in the number of quality distinctions and diphthongs.

Monophthongs

:

* are similar to the respective cardinal vowels .
* are phonetically near-close .
* are true-mid monophthongs when short and opening diphthongs (also transcribed as ) when long. The long allophones are typically transcribed , also in this article.
* are traditionally indicated with rounded front vowel symbols, but they are actually rounded central vowels closer in backness to respectively. in particular is very close to a true schwa , but rounded.https://notendur.hi.is/eirikur/ipv.pdf This article uses the symbols .
* is central (which can also be represented as or ).

Diphthongs

* Whereas the monophthong is a central vowel , the diphthong has a true front onset, (which can also be represented as ), while the diphthong has a back onset, . This article uses the common symbol for both onsets.
* The diphthongs do not exist outside certain sound reflexes and are effectively allophones of respectively rather than true phonemes.

"Thin" and "broad" vowels

Traditionally, though, the two primary divisions of Icelandic vowels are not monophthongs and diphthongs, but "thin" (or ''grönn'') and "broad" (or ''breið'') vowels.
* "Thin" vowels include the monophthongs , but not the close monophthongs .
* "Broad" vowels include all vowels that end in a close vowel, including the close monophthongs as well as all diphthongs .
These distinctions are involved in certain productive phonotactic processes in the standard language, especially where "thin" vowels are strengthened to "broad" vowel counterparts before ''gi'' and before ''ng'' or ''nk''. Each "thin" vowel is associated with one primary "broad" vowel counterpart ending in either or , which is the productive reflex before ''ng'' and ''nk''. Where the primary "broad" vowel ends in , each "thin" vowel also has a secondary association with another "broad" vowel (or allophone) ending in , which is the productive reflex before ''gi''.

Vowel length

Vowel length is mostly predictable in Icelandic . Stressed vowels (both monophthongs and diphthongs) are long:
*In one-syllable words where the vowel is word-final:
**''fá'' ('get')
**''nei'' ('no')
**''þú'' ('you' singular)
*Before a single consonant:
**''fara'' ('go')
**''hás'' ('hoarse')
**''ég'' ('I')
**''spyr'' ('I ask')
*Before any of the consonant clusters , , or . This is often shortened to the rule: If the first of the consonants is one of ''p'', ''t'', ''k'', ''s'' and the second is one of ''j'', ''v'', ''r'', then the vowel is long. This is known as the ''ptks+jvr-rule''.
**''lipra'' ('agile' accusative feminine)
**''sætra'' ('sweet' genitive plural)
**''akra'' ('fields' accusative plural)
**''hásra'' ('hoarse' genitive plural)
**''vepja'' ('lapwing')
**''letja'' ('dissuade')
**''vekja'' ('awaken')
**''Esja'' (' Esja')
**''götva'' as in ''uppgötva'' ('discover')
**''vökva'' ('water' verb)
*''g'' shows a peculiar behavior. If we have the combination V+''gi'', then the vowel V is short and the ''gi'' is then pronounced . Additionally, non-diphthong vowels (besides and ) become diphthongs ending in . In the combinations V+''g''+V (the second vowel not being ''i'') the first vowel is long and ''g'' is pronounced . An example: ''logi'' ('flame', nominative singular) vs. ''logar'' ('flames', nominative plural)As a written letter, ''g'' is the most eccentric of all. For instance ''guð'' ('God') is pronounced (nominative and accusative singular) but (dative singular), (genitive singular) and the is always used between vowels.
Before other consonant clusters (including the preaspirated stops and geminate consonants), stressed vowels are short. Unstressed vowels are always short.
*''Karl'' (' Carl')
*''standa'' ('stand')
*''sjálfur'' ('self')
*''kenna'' ('teach')
*''fínt'' ('fine')
*''loft'' ('air')
*''upp'' ('up')
*''yrði'' as in ''nýyrði'' ('neologism')
*''ætla'' ('will' verb)
*''laust'' ('loose')
An exception occurs if there is a ''t'' before the infix ''k''. Examples are e. g. ''notkun'' and ''litka''. There are also additional exceptions like um and ''fram'' where the vowel is short in spite of rules and ''en'', where the vowel length depends on the context.

Reflexes between consonants and vowels

A variety of phonotactic processes govern how Icelandic consonants and vowels assimilate with each other in speech.

Palatalization of velars

If any of the velar consonant sequences ''k g kk gg nk ng'' occur immediately before any of the front vowels or the consonant
''j'' , and usually also before the diphthong ''æ'' , then the sequences' velar phones change into their corresponding palatal phones. In the case of ''j'', the coalesces into the resulting palatal consonants and disappears. The velar phones remain velar before any of the non-front vowels , as well as before certain instances of the diphthong in foreign loanwords like ''gæd'' 'guide'.

Vowels before ''gi''

In the standard dialect, vowels immediately before ''gi'' within the same morpheme are pronounced phonetically short instead of phonetically long. Additionally, of these vowels, the monophthongs change into corresponding -ending short diphthongs , and changes into itself. This is the only usual circumstance in Icelandic where the diphthong phones can occur. This process does not occur in some dialects of southern Iceland, where the vowel may remain phonetically long and not change.

Vowels before ''ng'' and ''nk''

In the standard dialect, before any of the palatal or velar nasal consonants (which occur in the spellings ''ng'' and ''nk''), the monophthongs become certain diphthongs , and the mid-close monophthongs become corresponding close monophthongs . Existing diphthongs and existing close monophthongs are not affected. Since ''ng'' and ''nk'' are consonant clusters that cannot occur at the beginning of a word or morpheme, all vowels immediately before them can only be phonetically short. This process does not occur in some dialects of the Westfjords.

Aspiration

In the standard dialect, the voiceless plosive phonemes ''p t k'' are normally postaspirated as if they occur at the beginning of a morpheme, but are never postaspirated in the non-initial position within a morpheme and are instead pronounced . In particular, this makes the consonant pairs ''p/b'' and ''t/d'' homophones between vowels within a morpheme, though ''b'' and ''d'' tend not to occur in this position in Icelandic words inherited from Old Norse anyway. The aspiration does not always completely disappear, though:
* Geminated sequences ''pp tt kk'' within a morpheme become preaspirated .
* Any of the sequences ''pn pl tn tl kn kl'' after a vowel within a morpheme become preaspirated .
* In the sequences ''mp nt nk rk rp rt lp lt lk ðk'' within a morpheme, the second consonant is not postaspirated, but the first consonant becomes voiceless as another form of prespiration, resulting in .

But many of the dialects of northern Iceland, especially in the Eyjafjörður and Þingeyjarsýsla regions, may retain postaspiration of ''p t k'' as between vowels. Among Iceland's dialects, this feature is the most common surviving deviation from the standard dialect. Furthermore, in Þingeyjarsýsla and northeast Iceland, the sequences ''mp nt nk lp lk ðk'' within a morpheme before a vowel may retain a voiced pronunciation of their first consonant and a postaspirated pronunciation of their second consonant, resulting in . This does not affect the sequences ''rp rt rk lt'' within a morpheme, which all dialects pronounce like the standard dialect.

References

Bibliography

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*Kennslubók í Nútíma Íslensku handa Ítölum by Riccardo Venturi (Rikarður V. Albertsson)

{{DEFAULTSORT:Icelandic Phonology
Phonology
Germanic phonologies