IBM PERSONAL COMPUTER, commonly known as the
IBM PC, is the
original version and progenitor of the
IBM PC compatible hardware
platform . It is
IBM model number 5150, and was introduced on August
12, 1981. It was created by a team of engineers and designers under
the direction of
Don Estridge of the
IBM Entry Systems Division in
Boca Raton, Florida .
The generic term _personal computer _ was in use before 1981, applied
as early as 1972 to the Xerox PARC 's Alto , but because of the
success of the
IBM Personal Computer, the term "PC" came to mean more
specifically a desktop microcomputer compatible with IBM's _Personal
Computer_ branded products. Within a short time of the introduction,
third-party suppliers of peripheral devices, expansion cards, and
software proliferated; the influence of the
IBM PC on the personal
computer market was substantial in standardizing a platform for
personal computers. _"
IBM compatible"_ became an important criterion
for sales growth; after the 1980s, only the
Apple Macintosh family
kept significant market share without compatibility with the IBM
* 1 History
* 1.1 Rumors
* 1.2 Too late?
* 1.3 Predecessors
* 1.4 Project Chess
* 1.5 Open standards
* 1.6 Debut
The Little Tramp
* 1.7 Third-party products
* 1.8 Reaction
* 1.9 Success
* 1.10 Domination
IBM PC as standard
* 3 Third-party distribution
* 4 Models
* 4.1 Original PC
* 4.2 XT
* 4.3 XT/370
* 4.4 PCjr
* 4.5 Portable
* 4.6 AT
* 4.7 AT/370
* 4.8 Convertible
* 4.9 Next-generation
* 5 Technology
* 5.1 Electronics
* 5.2 Peripheral integrated circuits
* 5.3 Joystick port
* 5.4 Keyboard
* 5.5 Character set
* 5.6 Storage media
* 5.6.1 Cassette tape
* 5.6.2 Floppy diskettes
* 5.6.3 Fixed disks
* 5.6.4 OS support
* 5.8 Video output
Serial port addresses and interrupts
* 5.10 Printer port
* 6 Reception
* 7 Longevity
* 8 Collectability
* 9 See also
* 10 Notes
* 11 References
* 12 Further reading
* 13 External links
International Business Machines (IBM), one of the world's largest
companies, had a 62% share of the mainframe computer market in 1981.
Its share of the overall computer market, however, had declined from
60% in 1970 to 32% in 1980. Perhaps distracted by a long-running
antitrust lawsuit , the "Colossus of Armonk " completely missed the
fast-growing minicomputer market during the 1970s, and was behind
rivals such as Wang ,
Hewlett-Packard (HP), and Control Data in other
In 1979 _
BusinessWeek _ asked, "Is
IBM just another stodgy, mature
company?" By 1981 its stock price had declined by 22%. IBM's earnings
for the first half the year grew by 5.3%—one third of the inflation
rate —while those of minicomputer maker Digital Equipment
Corporation (DEC) grew by more than 35%. The company began selling
minicomputers, but in January 1982 the United States Department of
Justice ended the antitrust suit because, _
The New York Times _
reported, the government "recognized what computer experts and
securities analysts had long since concluded: I.B.M. no longer
dominates the computer business".
IBM wished to avoid the same outcome with the new personal computer
industry, dominated by the
Commodore PET ,
Atari 8-bit family , Apple
Tandy Corporation 's
TRS-80 , and various
CP/M machines. With
$150 million in sales by 1979 and projected annual growth of more than
40% in the early 1980s, the microcomputer market was large enough for
IBM's attention. Other large technology companies such as HP, Texas
Instruments , and
Data General had entered it, and some large IBM
customers were buying Apples, so the company saw introducing its
own personal computer as both an experiment in a new market and a
defense against rivals, large and small.
In 1980 and 1981 rumors spread of an
IBM personal computer, perhaps a
miniaturized version of the
System/370 , while Matsushita
acknowledged that it had discussed with
IBM the possibility of
manufacturing a personal computer for the American company. The
Japanese project, codenamed "Go", ended before the 1981 release of the
IBM PC codenamed "Chess", but two simultaneous
projects further confused rumors about the forthcoming product.
Data General and Texas Instruments' small computers were not very
successful, but observers expected AT in 1980 its least-expensive
computer, the 5120 , still cost about $13,500. The company only sold
through its internal sales force, had no experience with resellers or
retail stores, and did not introduce the first product designed to
work with non-
IBM equipment until 1980.
Another observer claimed that
IBM made decisions so slowly that, when
tested, "what they found is that it would take at least nine months to
ship an empty box". As with other large computer companies, its new
products typically required about four to five years for development.
IBM had to learn how to quickly develop, mass-produce, and market
new computers. While the company traditionally let others pioneer a
IBM released its first commercial computer a year after
UNIVAC in 1951, but within five years had 85% of the
market—the personal-computer development and pricing cycles were
much faster than for mainframes, with products designed in a few
months and obsolete quickly.
Many in the microcomputer industry resented IBM's power and wealth,
and disliked the perception that an industry founded by startups
needed a latecomer so staid that it had a strict dress code and
employee songbook. The potential importance to microcomputers of a
company so prestigious, that a popular saying in American companies
stated "No one ever got fired for buying IBM", was nonetheless clear.
InfoWorld _, which described itself as "The Newsweekly for
Microcomputer Users", stated that "for my grandmother, and for
millions of people like her, _IBM_ and _computer_ are synonymous".
_Byte _ ("The Small Systems Journal") stated in an editorial just
before the announcement of the
Rumors abound about personal computers to come from giants such as
Digital Equipment Corporation and the
General Electric Company. But
there is no contest. IBM's new personal computer ... is far and away
the media star, not because of its features, but because it exists at
all. When the number eight company in the
Fortune 500 enters the
field, that is news ... The influence of a personal computer made by a
company whose name has literally come to mean "computer" to most of
the world is hard to contemplate.
The editorial acknowledged that "some factions in our industry have
IBM as the 'enemy'", but concluded with optimism: "I want
to see personal computing take a giant step."
Desktop sized programmable calculators by Hewlett Packard had evolved
BASIC language computer by 1972. In 1972–1973 a
team led by Dr. Paul Friedl at the
IBM Los Gatos Scientific Center
developed a portable computer prototype called SCAMP (
APL Machine Portable) based on the
IBM PALM processor with a Philips
compact cassette drive, small CRT , and full-function keyboard. SCAMP
IBM 1130 minicomputer to run APL1130. In 1973 APL was
generally available only on mainframe computers, and most desktop
sized microcomputers such as the
Wang 2200 or HP 9800 offered only
BASIC. Because it was the first to emulate APL1130 performance on a
portable, single-user computer, _
PC Magazine _ in 1983 designated
SCAMP a "revolutionary concept" and "the world's first personal
computer". The prototype is in the
Smithsonian Institution . A
non-working industrial design model was also created in 1973 by
industrial designer Tom Hardy illustrating how the SCAMP engineering
prototype could be transformed into a usable product design for the
marketplace. This design model was requested by
IBM executive Bill
Lowe to complement the engineering prototype in his early efforts to
demonstrate the viability of creating a single-user computer.
Successful demonstrations of the 1973 SCAMP prototype led to the IBM
5100 portable microcomputer in 1975. In the late 1960s such a machine
would have been nearly as large as two desks and would have weighed
about half a ton. The 5100 was a complete computer system
programmable in BASIC or APL, with a small built-in CRT monitor,
keyboard, and tape drive for data storage. It was also very expensive,
up to US$20,000; the computer was designed for professional and
scientific customers, not business users or hobbyists. _BYTE_ in 1975
announced the 5100 with the headline "Welcome, IBM, to personal
computing", but _PC Magazine_ in 1984 described 5100s as "little
mainframes" and stated that "as personal computers, these machines
were dismal failures ... the antithesis of user-friendly", with no IBM
support for third-party software. Despite news reports that it was
IBM product without a model number, when the PC was
introduced in 1981 it was designated as the
IBM 5150, putting it in
the "5100" series though its architecture was not directly descended
IBM 5100. Later models followed in the trend: For example,
IBM Portable Personal Computer , PC/XT , and PC AT are
types 5155, 5160, and 5170, respectively.
Following SCAMP, the
Boca Raton, Florida Laboratory created
several single-user computer design concepts to support Lowe's ongoing
effort to convince
IBM there was a strategic opportunity in the
personal computer business. A selection of these early
concepts created by industrial designer Tom Hardy in the infancy of
personal computing is highlighted in the book ‘’DELETE: A Design
History of Computer Vapourware.‘’ One such concept in 1977,
code-named Aquarius, was a working prototype utilizing advanced bubble
memory cartridges. While this design was more powerful and smaller
Apple II launched the same year, the advanced bubble technology
was deemed unstable and not ready for mass production.
Some employees opposed
IBM entering the market. One said, "Why on
earth would you care about the personal computer? It has nothing at
all to do with office automation." "Besides", he added, "all it can do
is cause embarrassment for IBM". The company studied personal
Walden C. Rhines of TI, for example, in 1978 met
with a Boca Raton group considering the
TMS9900 for a secret 16-bit
microprocessor-based project —but had determined from studying the
market for years, and building the prototypes during the 1970s, that
IBM was unable to internally build a personal computer profitably.
John Opel was not among those skeptical of personal
computers. He and CEO
Frank Cary had created more than one dozen
semi-autonomous "Independent Business Units" (IBU) to encourage
innovation; _Fortune_ called them "How to start your own company
without leaving IBM". After Lowe became the first head of the Entry
Level Systems IBU in Boca Raton his team researched the market.
Computer dealers were very interested in selling an
IBM product, but
told Lowe that the company could not design, sell, or service it as
IBM had previously done. An
IBM microcomputer, they said, must be
composed of standard parts that store employees could repair. While
dealers disliked Apple's business practices, including a shortage of
Apple II while the company focused on the more sophisticated Apple
III , they saw no alternative because they doubted that IBM's
traditional sales methods and bureaucracy would change.
Atari in 1980 proposed that it act as original equipment manufacturer
IBM microcomputer. Aware that the company needed to enter the
market quickly —even the schools in
Broward County , near Boca
Raton, purchased Apples —in July 1980 Lowe met with Opel, Cary, and
others on the important Corporate Management Committee. Lowe
demonstrated the proposal with an industrial design model by Tom Hardy
based on the Atari 800 platform, and suggested acquiring Atari
"because we can't do this within the culture of IBM".
Cary agreed about the culture, observing that
IBM would need "four
years and three hundred people" to develop its own personal computer;
Lowe, however, promised one in a year if done without traditional IBM
methods. Instead of acquiring Atari, the committee allowed him to
form an independent group of employees—"the Dirty Dozen", led by
engineer Bill Sydnes—which, Lowe promised, could design a prototype
in 30 days. The crude prototype barely worked when he demonstrated it
in August, but Lowe presented a detailed business plan that proposed
that the new computer have an open architecture, use non-proprietary
components and software, and be sold through retail stores, all
The committee agreed that Lowe's approach was the most likely to
succeed. With Opel's strong support, in October it approved turning
the group into another IBU codenamed "Project Chess" to develop
"Acorn", with unusually large funding to help achieve the goal of
introducing the product within one year of the August demonstration.
After Lowe's promotion
Don Estridge became the head of Chess, and
by January 1981 the team made its first demonstration of the computer
within IBM. Other key members included Sydnes, Lewis Eggebrecht,
David Bradley , Mark Dean , and David O'Connor. Many were already
hobbyists who owned their own computers including Estridge, who had
an Apple II. After the team received permission to expand to 150 by
the end of 1980, it received more than 500 calls in one day from IBM
employees interested in joining the IBU.
IBM normally was vertically integrated , only purchasing components
like transformers and semiconductors. It internally developed all
important hardware and software and discouraged customers from
purchasing third-party products compatible with
IBM products. For the
PC the company avoided doing so as much as possible; choosing, for
example, to license
Microsoft BASIC despite having a BASIC of its own
for mainframes. Although the company denied doing so, many observers
IBM intentionally emulated Apple when designing the PC.
Apple II owners on the team influenced its decision to
design the computer with an open architecture and publish technical
information so others could create software and expansion slot
Although the company knew that it could not avoid competition from
third-party software on proprietary hardware—Digital Research
CP/M-86 for the
IBM Displaywriter , for example —it
considered using the
RISC processor and its operating system,
developed at the
Thomas J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights,
New York . The 801 processor was more than an order of magnitude more
powerful than the
Intel 8088 , and the operating system more advanced
PC DOS 1.0 operating system from
Microsoft . Ruling out an
in-house solution made the team’s job much easier and may have
avoided a delay in the schedule, but the ultimate consequences of this
IBM were far-reaching.
IBM had recently developed the Datamaster business microcomputer,
which used a processor and other chips from Intel; familiarity with
them and the immediate availability of the 8088 was a reason for
choosing it for the PC. The 62-pin expansion bus slots were designed
to be similar to the Datamaster slots. Differences from the Datamaster
included avoiding an all-in-one design while limiting the computer's
size so that it would still fit on a standard desktop with the
keyboard (also similar to the Datamaster's), and 5.25" disk drives
instead of 8". Delays due to in-house development of the Datamaster
software was a reason why
available for the 8088—and published available technical information
to encourage third-party developers.
IBM chose the 8088 over the
similar but superior 8086 because
Intel offered a better price on the
former and could provide more units, and the 8088's 8-bit bus reduced
the cost of the rest of the computer.
The design for the computer was essentially complete by April 1981,
when the manufacturing team took over the project.
IBM could not only
use its own hardware and make a profit with "Acorn". To save time and
money, the IBU built the machine with commercial off-the-shelf parts
from original equipment manufacturers whenever possible, with assembly
occurring in Boca Raton. The IBU would decide whether it would be more
economical to "Make or Buy" each manufacturing step. Various IBM
divisions for the first time competed with outsiders to build parts of
the new computer; a North Carolina
IBM factory built the keyboard, the
Endicott, New York factory had to lower its bid for printed circuit
boards , and a Taiwanese company built the monitor. The IBU chose
an existing monitor from
IBM Japan and an
Epson printer. Because of
the off-the-shelf parts only the system unit and keyboard has unique
IBM industrial design elements. Furthermore, the
IBM copyright appears
in only the ROM
BIOS and on the company logo, and the company
reportedly received no patents on the PC, with outsiders
manufacturing 90% of it. Because the product would carry the IBM
logo, the only corporate division the IBU could not bypass was the
Quality Assurance Unit. A component manufacturer described the
process of being selected as a supplier as rigorous and "absolutely
IBM inspectors even testing solder flux . They stayed
after selection, monitoring and helping to improve the manufacturing
process. IBM's size overwhelmed other companies; "a hundred IBM
engineers" reportedly visited
Mitel to meet with two of the latter's
employees about a problem, according to _The New York Times_.
Another aspect of
IBM that did not change was its emphasis on
secrecy. Those working on the project, within and outside of IBM,
were under strict confidentiality agreements. When an individual
mentioned in public on a Saturday that his company was working on
software for a new
IBM security appeared at the company
on Monday to investigate the leak. After an
IBM official discovered
printouts in a supplier's garbage, the former company persuaded the
latter to purchase a paper shredder .
Management Science America did
not know until after agreeing to buy
Peachtree Software in 1981 that
the latter was working on software for the PC. Developers received
prototype computers in boxes lined with lead to block
sealed with solder , and had to keep them in locked, windowless rooms;
to develop software
Microsoft emulated the PC on a DEC minicomputer
and used the prototype for debugging. After the PC's debut,
Raton employees continued to decline to discuss their jobs in public.
One writer compared the "silence" after asking one about his role at
the company to "hit the wall at the
Boston Marathon : the conversation
IBM is proud to announce a product _you_ may have a personal interest
in. It's a tool that could soon be on your desk, in your home or in
your child's schoolroom. It can make a surprising difference in the
way you work, learn or otherwise approach the complexities (and some
of the simple pleasures) of living.
It's the computer we're making for you. —
IBM PC advertisement,
After developing it in 12 months—faster than any other hardware
product in company history—
IBM announced the Personal Computer on 12
August 1981. Pricing started at US$1,565 (equivalent to $4,123 in
2016) for a configuration with 16K RAM,
Color Graphics Adapter , and
no disk drives. The company intentionally set prices for it and other
configurations that were comparable to those of Apple and other
rivals; one analyst stated that
IBM "has taken the gloves off",
while the company said "we suggest invites comparison". Microsoft,
Personal Software , and
Peachtree Software were among the developers
of nine launch titles , including
VisiCalc . In
addition to the existing corporate sales force
IBM opened its own
Product Center retail stores. After studying Apple's successful
distribution network, the company for the first time sold through
Sears Roebuck . Because retail stores
receive revenue from repairing computers and providing warranty
IBM broke a 70-year tradition by permitting and training
IBM service personnel to fix the PC.
IBM as having "the strongest marketing organization
in the world", but the PC's marketing also differed from that of
previous products. The company was aware of its strong corporate
reputation among potential customers; an early advertisement began
IBM of Personal Computers". The advertisements
emphasized the novelty of an individual owning an
describing "a product _you_ may have a personal interest in" and
asking readers to think of "'My own
IBM computer. Imagine that' ...
it's yours. For your business, your project, your department, your
class, your family and, indeed, for yourself."
The Little Tramp
Alan Alda ,
Beverly Sills ,
Kermit the Frog , and
Billy Martin as celebrity endorsers
Charlie Chaplin 's The
Little Tramp character—played by Billy Scudder—for a series of
advertisements based on Chaplin's films. The very popular and
award-winning $36-million marketing campaign made the star of _Modern
Times _—a film that expresses Chaplin's opposition to big business,
mechanization, and technological efficiency—the (as _Creative
Computing_ described him) "warm cuddly" mascot of one of the world's
Chaplin and his character became so widely associated with
IBM—_Time _ stated that "The Tramp ... has given a human face"
—that others used his bowler hat and cane to represent or satirize
the company. Although the Chaplin estate sued those like Otrona
who used the trademark without permission, _PC Magazine_'s April 1983
issue had 12 advertisements that referred to the Little Tramp.
It's a very different IBM.
— An outside developer surprised by the company's cooperation,
"We encourage third-part suppliers ... we are delighted to have
IBM stated. It did not sell internally developed PC software
until April 1984, instead relying on already established software
companies. The company contacted
Microsoft even before the official
approval of Chess, and it and others received cooperation that was,
one writer said, "_unheard of_" for IBM. Such openness surprised
observers; _BYTE_ called it "striking" and "startling", and one
developer reported that "it's a very different IBM." Another said
"They were very open and helpful about giving us all the technical
information we needed. The feeling was so radically different—it's
like stepping out into a warm breeze." He concluded, "After years of
hassling—fighting the Not-Invented-Here attitude—we're the gods."
Most other personal-computer companies that did not disclose
technical details; Texas Instruments, for example, intentionally made
TI 99/4A software difficult, even requiring a
lockout chip in cartridges.
IBM itself kept its mainframe technology
so secret that rivals were indicted for industrial espionage . For
the PC, however,
IBM immediately released detailed information. The
IBM PC Technical Reference Manual_ included complete circuit
schematics, commented ROM
BIOS source code , and other engineering and
programming information for all of IBM's PC-related hardware, plus
instructions on designing third-party peripherals. It was so
comprehensive that one reviewer suggested that the manual could serve
as a university textbook, and so clear that a developer claimed that
he could design an expansion card without seeing the physical
IBM marketed the technical manual in full-page color print
advertisements, stating that "our software story is still being
written. Maybe by you". Sydnes stated that "The definition of a
personal computer _is_ third-party hardware and software". Estridge
IBM did not keep software development proprietary because it
would have to "out-
VisiCalc VisiCorp and out-Peachtree Peachtree—and
you just can't do that", and unlike IBM's own version "Microsoft
BASIC had hundreds of thousands of users around the world. How are you
going to argue with that?"
Another advertisement told developers that the company would consider
publishing software for "Education. Entertainment. Personal finance.
Data management. Self-improvement. Games. Communications. And yes,
business." Estridge explicitly invited small, "cottage" amateur and
professional developers to create products "with", he said, "our logo
and our support".
IBM sold the PC at a large discount to employees,
encouraged them to write software, and distributed a catalog of
inexpensive software written by individuals that might not otherwise
appear in public.
_BYTE_ was correct in predicting that an
IBM personal computer would
receive much public attention. Its rapid development amazed observers,
as did the willingness of the Colossus of Armonk to sell as a launch
Microsoft _Adventure_ (a video game that, its press release
stated, brought "players into a fantasy world of caves and
treasures"); the company even offered an optional joystick port.
Future Computing estimated that "IBM's Billion Dollar Baby" would have
$2.3 billion in hardware sales by 1986.
David Bunnell , an editor at
Osborne/McGraw-Hill , recalled that
None of my associates wanted to talk about the
Apple II or the
Osborne I computer anymore, nor did they want to fantasize about
writing the next super-selling program ... All they wanted to talk
about was the
IBM Personal Computer—what it was, its potential and
limitations, and most of all, the impact
IBM would have on the
business of personal computing.
Within seven weeks Bunnell helped found _PC Magazine_, the first
periodical for the new computer.
Competitors were more skeptical.
Adam Osborne said "when you buy a
computer from IBM, you buy a la carte. By the time you have a computer
that does anything, it will cost more than an Apple. I don't think
Apple has anything to worry about." Apple's
Mike Markkula agreed that
IBM's product was more expensive than the Apple II, and claimed that
Apple III "offers better performance". He denied that the
offered more memory, stating that his company could offer more than
128K "but frankly we don't know what anyone would do with that
memory". At Tandy, John Roach said "I don't think it's that
Jon Shirley admitted that
IBM had a "legendary service
reputation" but claimed that its thousands of
Radio Shack stores "can
provide better service", while predicting that the
IBM PC's "major
market will be
IBM addicts"; another executive claimed that Tandy
could undersell a $3,000
IBM computer by $1,000. Many criticized the
PC's design as not innovative and outdated, and believed that its
alleged weaknesses, such as the use of single-sided, single-density
disks with less storage than the computer's RAM, existed because the
company was uncertain about the market and was experimenting before
releasing a better computer. (Estridge later boasted, "Many ...
said that there was nothing technologically new in this machine. That
was the best news we could have had; we actually had done what we had
set out to do." )
Rivals such as Apple, Tandy, and Commodore—together with more than
50% of the personal-computer market —had many advantages. While IBM
began with one microcomputer, little available hardware or software,
and a couple of hundred dealers,
Radio Shack had 14 million customers
and 8,000 stores—more than McDonald\'s —that only sold its broad
range of computers and accessories. Apple had five times as many
dealers in the US as IBM, an established international distribution
network, and an installed base of more than 250,000 customers.
Hundreds of independent developers produced software and peripherals
for both companies' computers; at least ten Apple databases and ten
word processors were available, while the PC had no databases and one
word processor. The computer had very limited graphics capability,
and customers who wanted both color and high-quality text had to
purchase two graphics cards and two monitors.
Steve Jobs at Apple ordered a team to examine an
IBM PC. After
finding it unimpressive—
Chris Espinosa called the computer "a
half-assed, hackneyed attempt"—the company confidently purchased a
full-page advertisement in _
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal _ with the
headline "Welcome, IBM. Seriously".
Bill Gates was at
Apple headquarters the day of IBM's announcement and later said "They
didn't seem to care. It took them a full year to realize what had
IBM PC was immediately successful. _BYTE_ reported a rumor that
more than 40,000 were ordered on the day of the announcement; John
Dvorak recalled that one dealer that day praised the computer as an
"incredible winner, and
IBM knows how to treat us — none of the
Apple arrogance". One dealer received 22 $1,000 deposits from
customers although he could not promise a delivery date. The company
could have sold its entire projected first-year production to
IBM customers that were reluctant to purchase Apples
were glad to buy microcomputers from its traditional supplier. The
computer began shipping in October, ahead of schedule; by then some
referred to it simply as the "PC".
_BYTE_ estimated that 90% of the 40,000 first-day orders were from
software developers. By
COMDEX in November
Tecmar developed 20
products including memory expansion and expansion chassis, surprising
Jerry Pournelle reported after attending the West Coast
Computer Faire in early 1982 that because
IBM "encourages amateurs"
with "documents that tell all", "an explosion of hardware and
software" was visible at the convention. Many manufacturers of
professional business application software, who had been
planning/developing versions for the Apple II, promptly switched their
efforts over to the
IBM PC when it was announced. Often, these
products needed the capacity and speed of a hard-disk. Although IBM
did not offer a hard-disk option for almost two years following
introduction of its PC, business sales were nonetheless catalyzed by
the simultaneous availability of hard-disk subsystems, like those of
Tallgrass Technologies which sold in Computerland stores alongside the
IBM 5150 at the introduction in 1981.
One year after the PC's release, although
IBM had sold fewer than
100,000 computers, _
PC World _ counted 753 software packages for the
PC—more than four times the number available for the Apple Macintosh
one year after its 1984 release—including 422 applications and
almost 200 utilities and languages. _InfoWorld_ reported that "most
of the major software houses have been frantically adapting their
programs to run on the PC", with new PC-specific developers composing
"an entire subindustry that has formed around the PC's open system",
which Dvorak described as a "de facto standard microcomputer". The
magazine estimated that "hundreds of tiny garage-shop operations" were
in "bloodthirsty" competition to sell peripherals, with 30 to 40
companies in a price war for memory-expansion cards, for example. _PC
Magazine_ renamed its planned "1001 Products to Use with Your
special issue after the number of product listings it received
exceeded the figure.
Tecmar and other companies that benefited from
IBM's openness rapidly grew in size and importance, as did _PC
Magazine_; within two years it expanded from 96 bimonthly to 800
monthly pages, including almost 500 pages of advertisements.
By the end of 1982
IBM was selling one PC every minute of the
business day. It estimated that 50 to 70% of PCs sold in retail
stores went to the home, and the publicity from selling a popular
product to consumers caused
IBM to, a spokesman said, "enter the
world" by familiarizing them with the Colossus of Armonk. Although the
PC only provided two to three percent of sales the company found that
it had underestimated demand by as much as 800%. Because its prices
were based on forecasts of much lower volume—250,000 over five
years, which would have made the PC a very successful IBM
product—the PC became very profitable; at times the company sold
almost that many computers per month. Estridge claimed in 1983 that
from October 1982 to March 1983 customer demand quadrupled. He stated
that the company had increased production three times in one year, and
warned of a component shortage if demand continued to increase. Many
small suppliers' sales to
IBM grew rapidly, both pleasing their
executives and causing them to worry about being overdependent on it.
Miniscribe , for example, in 1983 received 61% of its hard drive
orders from IBM; the company's stock price fell by more than one third
in one day after
IBM reduced orders in January 1984. Suppliers often
found, however, that the prestige of having
IBM as a customer led to
additional sales elsewhere.
Yankee Group estimated that ten new
products appeared every day. In August 1983 the Chess IBU, with 4,000
employees, became the Entry Systems Division, which observers believed
indicated that the PC was significantly important to
IBM overall, and
no longer an experiment. The PC surpassed the
Apple II as the
best-selling personal computer with more than 750,000 sold by the end
of the year, while DEC only sold 69,000 microcomputers in the first
nine months of the year despite offering three models for different
markets. Retailers also benefited, with 65% of BusinessLand 's
revenue coming from the PC. Demand still so exceeded supply two years
after its debut that, despite
IBM shipping 40,000 PCs a month, dealers
reportedly received 60% or less of their desired quantity. Pournelle
received the PC he paid for in early July 1983 on 1 November, and IBM
Boca Raton employees and neighbors had to wait five weeks to buy the
computers assembled there.
Yankee Group also stated that the PC had by 1983 "destroyed the
market for some older machines" from companies like Vector Graphic,
North Star , and
Cromemco . _inCider_ wrote "This may be an Apple
magazine, but let's not kid ourselves,
IBM has devoured competitors
like a cloud of locusts". By February 1984 _BYTE_ reported on "the
phenomenal market acceptance of the
IBM PC", and by fall concluded
that the company "has given the field its third major standard, after
Apple II and CP/M". Some rivals speculated that the government
might again prosecute
IBM for antitrust, and
Ben Rosen claimed that
the company's dominance "is having a chilling effect on new ventures,
a fear factor".
By then Apple was less welcoming of the rival that _inCider_ stated
had a "godlike" reputation. Its focus on the III had delayed
improvements to the II, and the sophisticated Lisa was unsuccessful in
part because, unlike the II and the PC, Apple discouraged third-party
developers. The head of a retail chain said "It appears that
IBM had a
better understanding of why the
Apple II was successful than had
Apple." Jobs, after trying to recruit Estridge to become Apple's
president, admitted that in two years
IBM had joined Apple as "the
industry's two strongest competitors". He warned in a speech before
previewing the forthcoming "1984 "
Super Bowl commercial : "It appears
IBM wants it _all_ ... Will Big Blue dominate the entire computer
industry? The entire information age? Was
George Orwell right about
IBM had $4 billion in annual PC revenue by 1984, more than twice that
of Apple and as much as the sales of Apple, Commodore, HP, and Sperry
combined, and 6% of total revenue. A _Fortune _ survey found that
56% of American companies with personal computers used
compared to Apple's 16%. A 1983 study of corporate customers
similarly found that two thirds of large customers standardizing on
one computer chose the PC, compared to 9% for Apple. IBM's own
documentation described the PC as inferior to competitors'
less-expensive products, but the company generally did not compete on
price; rather, the study found that they preferred "IBM's hegemony"
because of its support. Most companies with mainframes used their PCs
with the larger computers, which likely benefited IBM's mainframe
sales and discouraged their purchasing non-
IBM introduced the PC/AT, unlike its predecessor the most
sophisticated personal computer from any major company. By 1985 the
PC family had more than doubled Future Computing's 1986 revenue
estimate, with more than 12,000 applications and 4,500 dealers and
distributors worldwide. In his obituary that year, _The New York
Times_ wrote that Estridge had led the "extraordinarily successful
entry of the
International Business Machines Corporation into the
personal computer field". The Entry Systems Division had 10,000
employees and by itself would have been the world's third-largest
computer company behind
IBM and DEC, with more revenue than IBM's
minicomputer business despite its much later start.
IBM was the only
major company with significant minicomputer and microcomputer
businesses, in part because rivals like DEC and Wang did not adjust
to the retail market.
Rumors of "lookalike", compatible computers , created without IBM's
approval, began almost immediately after the
IBM PC's release. Other
manufacturers soon reverse engineered the
BIOS to produce their own
non-infringing functional copies.
Columbia Data Products introduced
the first IBM-
PC compatible computer in June 1982. In November 1982,
Compaq Computer Corporation announced the _
Compaq Portable _, the
IBM PC compatible. The first models were shipped in
IBM PC AS STANDARD
Main article: Influence of the
IBM PC on the personal computer market
The success of the
IBM computer led other companies to develop _IBM
Compatibles _, which in turn led to branding like diskettes being
advertised as "
IBM format". An
IBM PC clone could be built with
off-the-shelf parts, but the
BIOS required some reverse engineering.
Compaq , Phoenix
Software Associates , American
Megatrends , Award , and others achieved fully functional versions of
the BIOS, allowing companies like Dell, Gateway and HP to manufacture
PCs that worked like IBM's product. The
IBM PC became the industry
IBM had no retail experience, the retail chains ComputerLand
Sears Roebuck provided important knowledge of the marketplace.
They became the main outlets for the new product. More than 190
Computerland stores already existed, while Sears was in the process of
creating a handful of in-store computer centers for sale of the new
product. This guaranteed
IBM widespread distribution across the U.S.
Targeting the new PC at the home market,
Sears Roebuck sales failed
to live up to expectations. This unfavorable outcome revealed that the
strategy of targeting the office market was the key to higher sales.
IBM Personal Computer
IBM 5150 PC with
IBM 5151 monitor
IBM PC line_
Floppy disk or cassette system. One or two internal floppy drives
IBM PC to come with an internal hard drive as standard.
5160 with XT/370 Option Kit and 3277 Emulation Adapter
3270 terminal emulation, 20 function key keyboard
Floppy-based home computer, infrared keyboard
Faster processor, faster system bus (6 MHz, later 8 MHz, vs 4.77
MHz), jumperless configuration, real-time clock
5170 with AT/370 Option Kit and 3277 Emulation Adapter
3270 terminal emulation
Microfloppy laptop portable
Slow hard disk, but zero wait state memory on the motherboard .
This 6 MHz machine was actually faster than the 8 MHz ATs (when using
planar memory) because of the zero wait states
IBM personal computers are software backwards-compatible with
each other in general, but not every program will work in every
machine. Some programs are time sensitive to a particular speed class.
Older programs will not take advantage of newer higher-resolution and
higher-color display standards, while some newer programs require
newer display adapters. (Note that as the display adapter was an
adapter card in all of these
IBM models, newer display hardware could
easily be, and often was, retrofitted to older models.) A few
programs, typically very early ones, are written for and require a
specific version of the
BIOS ROM. Most notably,
was dependent on the
BIOS ROM had a sister program called GW-BASIC
which supported more functions, was 100% backwards compatible and
could run independently from the
IBM PC 5150.
The CGA video card, with a suitable modulator, could use an NTSC
television set or an RGBi monitor for display; IBM's RGBi monitor was
their display model 5153. The other option that was offered by
an MDA and their monochrome display model 5151 . It was possible to
install both an MDA and a CGA card and use both monitors concurrently
if supported by the application program. For example,
AutoCAD , Lotus
1-2-3 and others allowed use of a CGA Monitor for graphics and a
separate monochrome monitor for text menus. Some model 5150 PCs with
CGA monitors and a printer port also included the MDA adapter by
IBM provided the MDA port and printer port on the
same adapter card; it was in fact an MDA/printer port combo card.
Although cassette tape was originally envisioned by
IBM as a
low-budget storage alternative, the most commonly used medium was the
floppy disk . The 5150 was available with one or two 5-1/4" floppy
drives - with two drives the program disc(s) would be in drive A,
while drive B would hold the disc(s) for working files; with one drive
the user had to swap program and file discs into the single drive. For
models without any drives or storage medium,
IBM intended users to
connect their own cassette recorder via the 5150's cassette socket.
The cassette tape socket was physically the same
DIN plug as the
keyboard socket and next to it, but electrically completely different.
A hard disk could not be installed into the 5150's system unit
without changing to a higher-rated power supply (although later drives
with lower power consumption have been known to work with the standard
63.5 Watt unit). The "
IBM 5161 Expansion Chassis" came with its own
power supply and one 10 MB hard disk and allowed the installation of a
second hard disk. The system unit had five expansion slots, and the
expansion unit had eight; however, one of the system unit's slots and
one of the expansion unit's slots had to be occupied by the Extender
Card and Receiver Card, respectively, which were needed to connect the
expansion unit to the system unit and make the expansion unit's other
slots available, for a total of 11 slots. A working configuration
required that some of the slots be occupied by display, disk, and I/O
adapters, as none of these were built into the 5150's motherboard; the
only motherboard external connectors were the keyboard and cassette
PC speaker sound hardware was also on board.
The original PC's maximum memory using
IBM parts was 256 kB ,
achievable through the installation of 64 kB on the motherboard and
three 64 kB expansion cards. The processor was an
Intel 8088 running
at 4.77 MHz , 4/3 the standard NTSC color burst frequency of 315/88 =
3.57954 MHz. (In early units, the
Intel 8088 used was a 1978 version,
later were 1978/81/2 versions of the
Intel chip; second-sourced AMDs
were used after 1983). Some owners replaced the 8088 with an NEC V20
for a slight increase in processing speed and support for real mode
80186 instructions. The V20 gained its speed increase through the use
of a hardware multiplier which the 8088 lacked. An
coprocessor could also be added for hardware floating-point
IBM sold the first
IBM PCs in configurations with 16 or 64 kB of RAM
preinstalled using either nine or thirty-six 16-kilobit
(The ninth bit was used for parity checking of memory.) After the IBM
XT shipped, the
IBM PC motherboard was redesigned with the same RAM
configuration as the
IBM XT. (64 kB in one bank, expandable to 256kB
by populating the other 3 banks.)
Although the TV-compatible video board, cassette port and Federal
Communications Commission Class B certification were all aimed at
making it a home computer , the original PC proved too expensive for
the home market. At introduction, a PC with 64 kB of RAM and a single
5.25-inch floppy drive and monitor sold for US $ 3,005 (equivalent to
$7,916 in 2016), while the cheapest configuration (US $1,565) that had
no floppy drives, only 16 kB RAM, and no monitor (again, under the
expectation that users would connect their existing TV sets and
cassette recorders) proved too unattractive and low-spec, even for its
time (cf. footnotes to the above
IBM PC range table). While the 5150
did not become a top selling home computer, its floppy-based
configuration became an unexpectedly large success with businesses.
IBM Personal Computer XT
IBM Personal Computer XT",
IBM model 5160, was introduced two
years after the PC and featured a 10 megabyte hard drive. It had eight
expansion slots but the same processor and clock speed as the PC. The
XT had no cassette jack, but still had the Cassette Basic interpreter
The XT could take 256 kB of memory on the main board (using 64 kbit
DRAM); later models were expandable to 640 kB. The remaining 384
kilobytes of the 8088 address space were used for the
adapter ROM and RAM space, including video RAM space. It was usually
sold with a
Monochrome Display Adapter (MDA) video card or a CGA video
The eight expansion slots were the same as the model 5150 but were
spaced closer together. Although rare, a card designed for the 5150
could be wide enough to obstruct the adjacent slot in an XT. Because
of the spacing, an XT motherboard would not fit into a case designed
for the PC motherboard, but the slots and peripheral cards were
compatible. The XT expansion bus (later called "8 bit Industry
Standard Architecture " (ISA) by competitors) was retained in the IBM
AT, which added connectors for some slots to allow 16-bit transfers; 8
bit cards could be used in an AT.
PC-based IBM-compatible mainframes
IBM Personal Computer XT/370" was an XT with three custom 8-bit
cards: the processor card (370PC-P) contained a modified Motorola
68000 chip, microcoded to execute
System/370 instructions, a second
68000 to handle bus arbitration and memory transfers, and a modified
8087 to emulate the S/370 floating point instructions. The second card
(370PC-M) connected to the first and contained 512 kB of memory. The
third card (PC3277-EM), was a
3270 terminal emulator necessary to
install the system software for the VM/PC software to run the
The computer booted into DOS, then ran the VM/PC Control Program.
IBM PCjr" was IBM's first attempt to enter the market for
relatively inexpensive educational and home-use personal computers.
IBM model number 4860, retained the
IBM PC's 8088 CPU and
BIOS interface for compatibility, but its cost and differences in the
PCjr's architecture, as well as other design and implementation
decisions, eventually led to the PCjr, and the related
IBM JX , being
IBM Portable Personal Computer
IBM Portable Personal Computer" 5155 model 68 was an early
portable computer developed by
IBM after the success of Compaq's
suitcase-size portable machine (the
Compaq Portable). It was released
in February, 1984, and was eventually replaced by the
The Portable was an XT motherboard, transplanted into a Compaq-style
luggable case. The system featured 256 kilobytes of memory (expandable
to 512 kB), an added CGA card connected to an internal monochrome
(amber) composite monitor, and one or two half-height 5.25" 360K
floppy disk drives. Unlike the
Compaq Portable, which used a dual-mode
monitor and special display card,
IBM used a stock CGA board and a
composite monitor, which had lower resolution. It could however,
display color if connected to an external monitor or television.
IBM Personal Computer/AT
IBM Personal Computer/AT" (model 5170), announced August 15,
1984, used an
Intel 80286 processor, originally running at 6 MHz. It
had a 16-bit ISA bus and 20 MB hard drive . A faster model, running at
8 MHz and sporting a 30-megabyte hard disk was introduced in 1986.
The AT was designed to support multitasking; the new SysRq (System
request key ), little noted and often overlooked, is part of this
design, as is the 80286 itself, the first
Intel 16-bit processor with
multitasking features (i.e. the 80286 protected mode).
IBM made some
attempt at marketing the AT as a multi-user machine, but it sold
mainly as a faster PC for power users. For the most part,
were used as more powerful
DOS (single-tasking) personal computers, in
the literal sense of the PC name.
Early PC/ATs were plagued with reliability problems, in part because
of some software and hardware incompatibilities, but mostly related to
the internal 20 MB hard disk, and High Density Floppy Disk Drive.
While some people blamed IBM's hard disk controller card and others
blamed the hard disk manufacturer
Computer Memories Inc. (CMI), the
IBM controller card worked fine with other drives, including CMI's
33-MB model. The problems introduced doubt about the computer and, for
a while, even about the 286 architecture in general, but after IBM
replaced the 20 MB CMI drives, the PC/AT proved reliable and became a
lasting industry standard.
IBM AT's Drive parameter table listed the
CMI-33 as having 615 cylinders instead of the 640 the drive was
designed with, as to make the size an even 30 MB. Those who re-used
the drives mostly found that the 616th cylinder was bad due to it
being used as a landing area.
IBM Personal Computer AT/370" was an AT with two custom 16-bit
cards, running almost exactly the same setup as the XT/370.
IBM PC Convertible
IBM PC Convertible, released April 3, 1986, was IBM's first
laptop computer and was also the first
IBM computer to utilize the
3.5" floppy disk which went on to become the standard. Like modern
laptops, it featured power management and the ability to run from
batteries. It was the follow-up to the
IBM Portable and was model
number 5140. The concept and the design of the body was made by the
German industrial designer
Richard Sapper .
It utilized an
Intel 80c88 CPU (a CMOS version of the
running at 4.77 MHz, 256 kB of RAM (expandable to 640 kB), dual 720 kB
3.5" floppy drives, and a monochrome CGA-compatible LCD screen at a
price of $2,000. It weighed 13 pounds (5.8 kg) and featured a built-in
The PC Convertible had expansion capabilities through a proprietary
ISA bus-based port on the rear of the machine. Extension modules,
including a small printer and a video output module, could be snapped
into place. The machine could also take an internal modem, but there
was no room for an internal hard disk.
IBM PS/2 line was introduced in 1987. The Model 30 at the bottom
end of the lineup was very similar to earlier models; it used an 8086
processor and an ISA bus. The Model 30 was not "
IBM compatible" in
that it did not have standard 5.25-inch drive bays; it came with a
3.5-inch floppy drive and optionally a 3.5-inch-sized hard disk. Most
models in the PS/2 line further departed from "
IBM compatible" by
replacing the ISA bus completely with
Micro Channel Architecture .
IBM Personal Computer motherboard,
IBM 5150. It has
Industry Standard Architecture
Industry Standard Architecture slots, and two DIN
connectors for keyboard and cassette interface.
The main circuit board in an PC is called the motherboard (IBM
terminology calls it a _planar_). This mainly carries the CPU and RAM
, and it has a bus with slots for expansion cards. On the motherboard
are also the ROM subsystem, DMA and IRQ controllers, coprocessor
socket, sound (PC speaker, tone generation) circuitry, and keyboard
interface. The original PC also has a cassette interface.
The bus used in the original PC became very popular, and it was
subsequently named ISA . While it was popular, it was more commonly
known as the PC-bus or XT-bus; the term _ISA_ arose later when
industry leaders chose to continue manufacturing machines based on the
IBM PC AT architecture rather than license the PS/2 architecture and
its MCA bus from IBM. The XT-bus was then retroactively named _8-bit
ISA_ or _XT ISA_, while the unqualified term _ISA_ usually refers to
the 16-bit AT-bus (as better defined in the ISA specifications.) The
AT-bus is an extension of the PC-/XT-bus and is in use to this day in
computers for industrial use, where its relatively low speed, 5 volt
signals, and relatively simple, straightforward design (all by year
2011 standards) give it technical advantages (e.g. noise immunity for
reliability). Quadram Quadboard.
A monitor and any floppy or hard disk drives are connected to the
motherboard through cables connected to graphics adapter and disk
controller cards, respectively, installed in expansion slots. Each
expansion slot on the motherboard has a corresponding opening in the
back of the computer case through which the card can expose
connectors; a blank metal cover plate covers this case opening (to
prevent dust and debris intrusion and control airflow) when no
expansion card is installed. Memory expansion beyond the amount
installable on the motherboard was also done with boards installed in
expansion slots, and I/O devices such as parallel, serial, or network
ports were likewise installed as individual expansion boards. For this
reason, it was easy to fill the five expansion slots of the PC, or
even the eight slots of the XT, even without installing any special
hardware. Companies like Quadram and AST addressed this with their
popular multi-I/O cards which combine several peripherals on one
adapter card that uses only one slot; Quadram offered the QuadBoard
and AST the SixPak.
Intel 8086 and 8088 -based PCs require expanded memory (EMS) boards
to work with more than 640 kB of memory. (Though the 8088 can address
one megabyte of memory, the last 384 kB of that is used or reserved
BIOS ROM, BASIC ROM, extension ROMs installed on adapter
cards, and memory address space used by devices including display
adapter RAM and even the 64 kB EMS page frame itself.) The original
IBM PC AT used an
Intel 80286 processor which can access up to 16 MB
of memory (though standard
DOS applications cannot use more than one
megabyte without using additional APIs.)
Intel 80286-based computers
OS/2 can work with the maximum memory.
PERIPHERAL INTEGRATED CIRCUITS
The set of peripheral chips selected for the original
IBM PC defined
the functionality of an
IBM compatible. These became the de facto base
for later application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) used in
The original system chips were one
Intel 8259 programmable interrupt
controller (PIC) (at I/O address 0x20), one
Intel 8237 direct memory
access (DMA) controller (at I/O address 0x00), and an
programmable interval timer (PIT) (at I/O address 0x40). The PIT
provides the 18.2 Hz clock ticks, dynamic memory refresh timing, and
can be used for speaker output; one DMA channel is used to perform
the memory refresh.
The mathematics coprocessor was the
Intel 8087 using I/O address
0xF0. This was an option for users who needed extensive floating-point
arithmetic, such as users of computer-aided drafting.
IBM PC AT added a second, slave 8259 PIC (at I/O address 0xA0), a
second 8237 DMA controller for 16-bit DMA (at I/O address 0xC0), a DMA
address register (implemented with a 74LS612 IC) (at I/O address
0x80), and a
Motorola MC146818 real-time clock (RTC) with nonvolatile
memory (NVRAM) used for system configuration (replacing the DIP
switches and jumpers used for this purpose in PC and PC/XT models (at
I/O address 0x70). On expansion cards, the
Intel 8255 programmable
peripheral interface (PPI) (at I/O addresses 0x378 is used for
parallel I/O controls the printer, and the 8250 universal
asynchronous receiver/transmitter (UART) (at I/O address 0x3F8 or
0x3E8) controls the serial communication at the (pseudo-) RS-232
IBM offered a
Game Control Adapter for the PC, which supported
analog joysticks similar to those on the Apple II. Although analog
controls proved inferior for arcade-style games, they were an asset in
certain other genres such as flight simulators . The joystick port on
IBM PC supported two controllers, but required a Y-splitter cable
to connect both at once. It remained the standard joystick interface
IBM compatibles until being replaced by
USB during the 2000s.
IBM PC keyboard The original keyboard for the IBM
The keyboard that came with the
IBM 5150 was an extremely reliable
and high-quality electronic keyboard originally developed in North
Carolina for the Datamaster. Each key was rated to be reliable to
over 100 million keystrokes. For the
IBM PC, a separate keyboard
housing was designed with a novel usability feature that allowed users
to adjust the keyboard angle for personal comfort. Compared with the
keyboards of other small computers at the time, the
IBM PC keyboard
was far superior and played a significant role in establishing a
high-quality impression. For example, the industrial design of the
adjustable keyboard, together with the system unit, was recognized
with a major design award. _Byte _ magazine in the fall of 1981 went
so far as to state that the keyboard was 50% of the reason to buy an
IBM PC. The importance of the keyboard was definitely established when
IBM PCjr flopped, in very large part for having a much
different and mediocre
Chiclet keyboard that made a poor impression on
customers. Oddly enough, the same thing almost happened to the
IBM PC when in early 1981 management seriously considered
substituting a cheaper and lower quality keyboard. This mistake was
narrowly avoided on the advice of one of the original development
However, the original 1981
IBM PC 83-key keyboard was criticized by
typists for its non-standard placement of the Return and left ⇧
Shift keys, and because it did not have separate cursor and numeric
pads that were popular on the pre-PC DEC
VT100 series video terminals.
Key Tronic introduced the now standard 101-key PC keyboard.
IBM corrected the Return and left ⇧ Shift keys on its AT
keyboard, but shortened the Backspace key, making it harder to reach.
IBM changed to the 101 key enhanced keyboard , which added
the separate cursor and numeric key pads, relocated all the function
keys and the Ctrl keys, and the Esc key was also relocated to the
opposite side of the keyboard.
Another feature of the original keyboard is the relatively loud
"click" sound each key made when pressed. Since typewriter users were
accustomed to keeping their eyes on the hardcopy they were typing from
and had come to rely on the mechanical sound that was made as each
character was typed onto the paper to ensure that they had pressed the
key hard enough (and only once), the PC keyboard used a keyswitch that
produced a click and tactile bump intended to provide that same
IBM PC keyboard is very robust and flexible. The low-level
interface for each key is the same: each key sends a signal when it is
pressed and another signal when it is released. An integrated
microcontroller in the keyboard scans the keyboard and encodes a "scan
code" and "release code" for each key as it is pressed and released
separately. Any key can be used as a shift key, and a large number of
keys can be held down simultaneously and separately sensed. The
controller in the keyboard handles typematic operation, issuing
periodic repeat scan codes for a depressed key and then a single
release code when the key is finally released.
IBM PC compatible" may have a keyboard that does not recognize
every key combination a true
IBM PC does, such as shifted cursor keys.
In addition, the "compatible" vendors sometimes used proprietary
keyboard interfaces, preventing the keyboard from being replaced.
Although the PC/XT and AT used the same style of keyboard connector,
the low-level protocol for reading the keyboard was different between
these two series. The AT keyboard uses a bidirectional interface which
allows the computer to send commands to the keyboard. An AT keyboard
could not be used in an XT, nor the reverse. Third-party keyboard
manufacturers provided a switch on some of their keyboards to select
either the AT-style or XT-style protocol for the keyboard. See also:
IBM PC used the 7-bit
ASCII alphabet as its basis, but
extended it to 8 bits with nonstandard character codes. This character
set was not suitable for some international applications, and soon a
veritable cottage industry emerged providing variants of the original
character set in various national variants. In
IBM tradition, these
variants were called code pages . These codings are now obsolete,
having been replaced by more systematic and standardized forms of
character coding, such as
ISO 8859-1 ,
Unicode . The
original character set is known as code page 437 .
IBM cassette tape
IBM equipped the model 5150 with a cassette port for connecting a
cassette drive and assumed that home users would purchase the low-end
model and save files to cassette tapes as was typical of home
computers of the time. However, adoption of the floppy- and
monitor-less configuration was low; few (if any)
IBM PCs left the
factory without a floppy disk drive installed. Also,
DOS was not
available on cassette tape, only on floppy disks (hence "Disk
Operating System"). 5150s with just external cassette recorders for
storage could only use the built-in ROM BASIC as their operating
DOS saw increasing adoption, the incompatibility of DOS
programs with PCs that used only cassettes for storage made this
configuration even less attractive. The ROM
BIOS supported cassette
IBM PC cassette interface encodes data using frequency modulation
with a variable data rate. Either a one or a zero is represented by a
single cycle of a square wave, but the square wave frequencies differ
by a factor of two, with ones having the lower frequency. Therefore,
the bit periods for zeros and ones also differ by a factor of two,
with the unusual effect that a data stream with more zeros than ones
will use less tape (and time) than an equal-length (in bits) data
stream containing more ones than zeros, or equal numbers of each.
IBM also had an exclusive license agreement with
Microsoft to include
BASIC in the ROM of the PC; clone manufacturers could not have ROM
BASIC on their machines, but it also became a problem as the XT, AT,
and PS/2 eliminated the cassette port and
IBM was still required to
install the (now useless) BASIC with them. The agreement finally
expired in 1991 when
Microsoft replaced BASICA/
The main core BASIC resided in ROM and "linked" up with the
RAM-resident BASIC.COM/BASICA.COM included with PC-
DOS (they provided
disk support and other extended features not present in ROM BASIC).
Because BASIC was over 50 kB in size, this served a useful function
during the first three years of the PC when machines only had 64–128
kB of memory, but became less important by 1985. For comparison, clone
makers such as
Compaq were forced to include a version of BASIC that
resided entirely in RAM.
Tandon 5.25-inch Diskette Drive with a partially inserted
double-density diskette containing
Most or all 5150 PCs had one or two 5.25-inch floppy disk drives.
These were either single-sided double-density (SSDD) or double-sided
double-density (DSDD) drives. The
IBM PC never used single density
floppy drives. The drives and disks were commonly referred to by
capacity, such as "160KB floppy disk" or "360KB floppy drive". DSDD
drives were backwards compatible; they could read and write SSDD
floppies. The same type of physical diskette media could be used for
both drives, but a disk formatted for double-sided use could not be
read on a single-sided drive.
The disks were
Modified Frequency Modulation (MFM) coded in 512-byte
sectors, and were soft-sectored. They contained 40 tracks per side at
the 48 track per inch (TPI) density, and initially were formatted to
contain eight sectors per track. This meant that SSDD disks initially
had a formatted capacity of 160 kB, while DSDD disks had a capacity
of 320 kB. However, the
DOS operating system was later updated to
allow formatting the disks with nine sectors per track. This yielded a
formatted capacity of 180 kB with SSDD disks/drives, and 360 kB with
DSDD disks/drives. The _unformatted_ capacity of the floppy disks was
advertised as "250KB" for SSDD and "500KB" for DSDD ("KB" ambiguously
referring to either 1000 or 1024 bytes; essentially the same for
rounded-off values), however these "raw" 250/500 kB were not the same
thing as the usable formatted capacity; under DOS, the maximum
capacity for SSDD and DSDD disks was 180 kB and 360 kB, respectively.
Regardless of type, the file system of all floppy disks (under DOS)
IBM PCs had only single-sided floppy drives until
double-sided drives became available in the spring of 1982. After the
upgraded 64k-256k motherboard PCs arrived in early 1983, single-sided
drives and the cassette model were discontinued.
IBM's original floppy disk controller card also included an external
37-pin D-shell connector. This allowed users to connect additional
external floppy drives by third party vendors, but
IBM did not offer
their own external floppies until 1986.
The industry-standard way of setting floppy drive numbers was via
setting jumper switches on the drive unit, however
IBM chose to
instead use a method known as the "cable twist" which had a floppy
data cable with a bend in the middle of it that served as a switch for
the drive motor control. This eliminated the need for users to adjust
jumpers while installing a floppy drive.
20MB Seagate ST-225 with a controller card by
The 5150 could not itself power hard drives without retrofitting a
stronger power supply, but
IBM later offered the 5161 Expansion Unit,
which not only provided more expansion slots, but also included a 10
MB (later 20 MB) hard drive powered by the 5161's own separate
130-watt power supply. The
IBM 5161 Expansion Unit was released in
During the first year of the
IBM PC, it was commonplace for users to
install third-party Winchester hard disks which generally connected to
the floppy controller and required a patched version of PC-
treated them as a giant floppy disk (there was no subdirectory
IBM began offering hard disks with the XT, however the original PC
was never sold with them. Nonetheless, many users installed hard disks
and upgraded power supplies in them.
After floppy disks became obsolete in the early 2000s, the letters A
and B became unused. But for 25 years, virtually all DOS-based PC
software assumed the program installation drive was C, so the primary
HDD continues to be "the C drive" even today. Other operating system
families (e.g. Unix) are not bound to these designations.
IBM Disk Operating System version 1.1 by
Which operating system
IBM customers would choose was at first
unclear. Although the company expected that most would use PC
IBM supported using
CP/M-86 —which became available six months after
DOS —or UCSD p-System as operating systems.
IBM promised that it
would not favor one operating system over the others; the CP/M-86
support surprised Gates, who claimed that
IBM was "blackmailed into
IBM was correct, nonetheless, in its expectation; one survey
found that 96.3% of PCs were ordered with the $40
DOS compared to 3.4%
for the $240 CP/M-86.
IBM PC's ROM BASIC and
BIOS supported cassette tape storage. PC
DOS itself did not support cassette tape storage. PC
DOS version 1.00
supported only 160 kB SSDD floppies, but version 1.1, which was
released nine months after the PC's introduction, supported 160 kB
SSDD and 320 kB DSDD floppies. Support for the slightly larger nine
sector per track 180 kB and 360 kB formats arrived 10 months later in
BIOS (Basic Input/Output System) provided the core ROM code for
the PC. It contained a library of functions that software could call
for basic tasks such as video output, keyboard input, and disk access
in addition to interrupt handling, loading the operating system on
boot-up, and testing memory and other system components.
BIOS was 8k in size and occupied four 2k ROM
chips on the motherboard, with a fifth and sixth empty slot left for
any extra ROMs the user wished to install.
IBM offered three different
BIOS revisions during the PC's lifespan. The initial
BIOS was dated
April 1981 and came on the earliest models with single-sided floppy
drives and PC
DOS 1.00. The second version was dated October 1981 and
arrived on the "Revision B" models sold with double-sided drives and
DOS 1.10. It corrected some bugs, but was otherwise unchanged.
Finally, the third
BIOS version was dated October 1982 and found on
IBM PCs with the newer 64k-256k motherboard. This revision was
more-or-less identical to the XT's BIOS. It added support for
detecting ROMs on expansion cards as well as the ability to use 640k
of memory (the earlier
BIOS revisions had a limit of 544k). Unlike the
XT, the original PC remained functionally unchanged from 1983 until
its discontinuation in early 1987 and did not get support for 101-key
keyboards or 3.5" floppy drives, nor was it ever offered with
IBM initially offered two video adapters for the PC, the
Color/Graphics Adapter and the Monochrome Display and Printer Adapter
. CGA was intended to be a typical home computer display; it had NTSC
output and could be connected to a composite monitor or a
TV set with
an RF modulator in addition to RGB for digital RGBI-type monitors,
IBM did not offer their own RGB monitor until 1983. Supported
graphics modes were 40 or 80×25 color text with 8×8 character
resolution, 320×200 bitmap graphics with two fixed 4-color palettes,
or 640×200 monochrome graphics.
The MDA card and its companion 5151 monitor supported only 80×25
text with a 9×14 character resolution (total pixel resolution was
720×350). It was mainly intended for the business market and so also
included a printer port.
During 1982, the first third-party video card for the PC appeared
when Hercules Computer Technologies released a clone of the MDA that
could use bitmap graphics. Although not supported by the BIOS, the
Hercules Graphics Adapter became extremely popular for business use
due to allowing sharp, high resolution graphics plus text and itself
was widely cloned by other manufacturers.
In 1985, after the launch of the
IBM AT, the new Enhanced Graphics
Adapter became available which could support 320×200 or 640×200 in
16 colors in addition to high-resolution 640×350 16 color graphics.
IBM also offered a video board for the PC, XT, and AT known as the
Professional Graphics Adapter during 1984–86, mainly intended for
CAD design. It was extremely expensive, required a special monitor,
and was rarely ordered by customers.
VGA graphics cards could also be installed in
IBM PCs and XTs,
although they were introduced after the computer's discontinuation.
SERIAL PORT ADDRESSES AND INTERRUPTS
The serial port is an 8250 or a derivative (such as the 16450 or
16550 ), mapped to eight consecutive IO addresses and one interrupt
BASE PORT ADDRESS
Only COM1: and COM2: addresses were defined by the original PC.
Attempts to share IRQ3 and IRQ4 to use additional ports require
special measures in hardware and software, since shared IRQs were not
defined in the original PC design. The most typical devices plugged
into the serial port were modems and mice . Plotters and serial
printers were also among the more commonly used serial peripherals,
and there were numerous other more unusual uses such as operating cash
registers , factory equipment, and connecting terminals .
IBM made a deal with Japan-based
Epson to produce printers for the PC
and all IBM-branded printers were manufactured by that company (Epson
of course also sold printers with their own name). There was a
considerable amount of controversy when
IBM included a printer port on
the PC that did not follow the industry-standard
and it was rumored that this had been done to prevent customers from
IBM printers with their machines (plugging a
Centronics printer into an
IBM PC could damage the printer, the
parallel port, or both). Although third-party cards were available
Centronics ports on them, PC clones quickly copied the IBM
printer port and by the late 80s, it had largely displaced the
_BYTE_ wrote in October 1981 that the
IBM PC's "hardware is
impressive, but even more striking are two decisions made by IBM: to
use outside suppliers already established in the microcomputer
industry, and to provide information and assistance to independent,
small-scale software writers and manufacturers of peripheral devices".
It praised the "smart" hardware design and stated that its price was
not much higher than the 8-bit machines from Apple and others. The
reviewer admitted that the computer "came as a shock. I expected that
the giant would stumble by overestimating or underestimating the
capabilities the public wants and stubbornly insisting on
incompatibility with the rest of the microcomputer world. But IBM
didn't stumble at all; instead, the giant jumped leagues in front of
the competition ... the only disappointment about the
Computer is its dull name".
In a more detailed review in January 1982, _BYTE_ called the
"a synthesis of the best the microcomputer industry has offered to
date ... as well designed on the inside as it is on the outside". The
magazine praised the keyboard as "bar none, the best ... on any
microcomputer", describing the unusual
Shift key locations as "minor
compared to some of the gigantic mistakes made on almost every other
microcomputer keyboard". The review also complimented IBM's manuals,
which it predicted "will set the standard for all microcomputer
documentation in the future. Not only are they well packaged, well
organized, and easy to understand, but they are also _complete_".
Observing that detailed technical information was available "much
earlier ... than it has been for other machines", the magazine
predicted that "given a reasonable period of time, plenty of hardware
and software will probably be developed for" the computer. The review
stated that although the
IBM PC cost more than comparably configured
Apple II and
TRS-80 computers, and the insufficient number of slots
for all desirable expansion cards was its most serious weakness, "you
get a _lot_ more for your money" and concluded, "In two years or so, I
think will be one of the most popular and best-supported ... IBM
should be proud of the people who designed it".
In a special 1984 issue dedicated to the
IBM PC, _BYTE_ concluded
that the PC had succeeded both because of its features like an
80-column screen, open architecture, and high-quality keyboard, and
"the failure of other major companies to provide these same
fundamental features earlier. In retrospect, it seems
IBM stepped into
a void that remained, paradoxically, at the center of a crowded
IBM PCs have remained in service long after their technology
became largely obsolete. In June 2006,
IBM PC and XT models were still
in use at the majority of U.S.
National Weather Service upper-air
observing sites, used to process data as it is returned from the
ascending radiosonde , attached to a weather balloon , although they
have been slowly phased out. Factors that have contributed to the 5150
PC's longevity are its flexible modular design, its open technical
standard (making information needed to adapt, modify, and repair it
readily available), use of few special nonstandard parts, and rugged
IBM manufacturing, which provided for exceptional
long-term reliability and durability.
Some of the mechanical aspects of the slot specifications are still
used in current PCs. A few systems still come with PS/2 style keyboard
and mouse connectors.
IBM model 5150 Personal Computer has become a collectable among
vintage computer collectors, due to the system being the first true
“PC” as we know them today. Today these systems can fetch anywhere
from $100 to $4500, depending on cosmetic and operational condition.
IBM model 5150 has proven to be reliable; despite their age of 30
years or more, some still function as they did when new.
* Information technology portal
IBM token ring networks
Input/Output Base Address
* List of
* ^ Repeating decimal notation
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Salmans, Sandra (1982-01-09). "Dominance Ended,
I.B.M. Fights Back". _The New York Times_. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ _H_ _I_ _J_ _K_ _L_ _M_ Burton,
Kathleen (February 1983). "Anatomy of a Colossus, Part II". _PC
Magazine_. p. 316. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ "I.B.M.\'S Speedy Redirection". _The New York Times_.
1983-11-02. Retrieved 2011-02-25.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ Camenker, Brian (Nov 1983). "The Making of the
IBM PC". _BYTE_. pp. 254, 256. Retrieved 19 March 2016.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ _H_ _I_ _J_ _K_ _L_ _M_ _N_
Sandler, Corey (November 1984). "IBM: Colossus of Armonk". _Creative
Computing_. p. 298. Retrieved February 26, 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ _H_ _I_ Libes, Sol (December 1981).
"Bytelines". _BYTE_. pp. 314–318. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Jeffery, Brian (1985-09-30). "IBM\'s high-end
micros encroaching on mini territory". _Computerworld_. pp.
SR/20–21. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
* ^ "Total share: 30 years of personal computer market share
figures", Jeremy Reimer December 14, 2005 arstechnica.com
* ^ Morgan, Christopher P (March 1980). "Hewlett-Packard\'s New
Personal Computer". _BYTE_. p. 60. Retrieved 18 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ Swaine, Michael (1981-10-05). "Tom Swift
Meets the Big Boys: Small Firms Beware". _InfoWorld_. p. 45. Retrieved
1 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ Gens, Frank; Christiansen, Chris (November
1983). "Could 1,000,000
IBM PC Users Be Wrong?". _BYTE_. p. 135.
Retrieved 19 March 2016.
* ^ "Interest Group for Possible
IBM Computer". _BYTE_. January
1981. p. 313. Retrieved 18 October 2013.
* ^ Libes, Sol (June 1981). "
IBM and Matsushita to Join Forces?".
_BYTE_. p. 208. Retrieved 18 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ Morgan, Chris (July 1981). "IBM\'s Personal
Computer". _BYTE_. p. 6. Retrieved 18 October 2013.
* ^ Markoff, John (1981-10-05). "Newcomers Join Rush to Enter
Personal Computing". _InfoWorld_. pp. 46–47. Retrieved 2 January
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ Blaxill, Mark; Eckardt, Ralph (2009). _The
Invisible Edge: Taking Your Strategy to the Next Level Using
Intellectual Property_. Penguin Group. pp. 195–198. ISBN
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ "The birth of the
IBM PC". IBM
Archives. Retrieved 13 June 2014.
* ^ "
IBM 5120". IBM. Retrieved 20 March 2016.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ Wise, Deborah (1982-08-23). "The
colossus runs, not plods— how the
IBM PC came to be". _InfoWorld_.
p. 13. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ _H_ _I_ _J_ McMullen, Barbara E.;
John F. (1984-02-21). "Apple Charts The Course For IBM". _PC
Magazine_. p. 122. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ _H_ _I_ Hormby, Tom (2006-08-12).
"Origin of the
IBM PC". Low End Mac. Retrieved 10 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ Seidner, Rich (speaker); Cringely, Robert X.
(June 1996). "Part II". _Triumph of the Nerds: The Rise of Accidental
Empires_. Season 1. PBS.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ Morgan, Chris (January 1982). "Of
IBM, Operating Systems, and Rosetta Stones". _BYTE_. p. 6. Retrieved
19 October 2013.
* ^ Bunnell, David (Feb–Mar 1982). "The Man Behind The Machine? /
A PC Exclusive Interview With
Software Guru Bill Gates". _PC
Magazine_. p. 16. Retrieved February 17, 2012.
* ^ _A_ _B_ Edlin, Jim (February–March 1982). "Confessions of a
Convert". _PC Magazine_. p. 12. Retrieved 20 October 2013.
* ^ Halfhill, Tom R. (December 1986). "The MS-
DOS Invasion / IBM
Compatibles Are Coming Home". _Compute!_. p. 32. Retrieved 9 November
* ^ _A_ _B_ Rawsthorn, Alice (2011-07-31). "The Clunky PC That
Started It All". _The New York Times_. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ _H_ Zussman, John Unger
(1982-08-23). "Let\'s keep those systems open". _InfoWorld_. p. 29.
Retrieved 29 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ "
IBM Archives". Archived from the original on
* ^ Friedl, Paul J. (November 1983). "SCAMP: The Missing Link In
The PC\'s Past?". _PC_. pp. 190–197. Retrieved 8 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ Atkinson, P, (2013) _DELETE: A Design
History of Computer Vapourware_, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
* ^ "Obsolete Technology Website". Retrieved 2008-08-14.
* ^ "Welcome, IBM, to personal computing". _BYTE_. December 1975.
p. 90. Retrieved 19 March 2016.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ "PCommuniques". _PC Magazine_. February–March
1982. p. 5. Retrieved 20 October 2013.
* ^ Likewise, IBM's early PC video display monitors have similar
IBM Monochrome Display (IBM's MDA monitor) is machine
type 5151, the
IBM Color Display (their CGA monitor) is machine type
5153, and the
IBM Enhanced Color Display (their EGA monitor)) is
machine type 5154.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ _H_ _I_ _J_ Scott, Greg (October
1988). ""Blue Magic": A Review". _U-M Computing News_. 3 (19):
* ^ Hey, Tony; Papay, Gyuri (2014). _The Computing Universe: A
Journey through a Revolution_. Cambridge University Press. p. 153.
ISBN 9780521766456 .
* ^ Rhines, Walden C. (2017-06-22). "The Inside Story of Texas
Instruments’ Biggest Blunder: The
TMS9900 Microprocessor". _IEEE
Spectrum_. Retrieved 2017-07-08.
* ^ Musil, Steven (2013-10-28). "William Lowe, the \'father of the
IBM PC,\' dies at 72". CNet. Retrieved 8 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ Porter, Martin (November 1983). "The
Boca". _PC Magazine_. p. 162. Retrieved 22 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ Elder, Tait (July 1989). "New Ventures: Lessons
from Xerox and IBM". _Harvard Business Review_. Retrieved 20 January
* ^ _A_ _B_ Porter, Martin (1984-09-18). "Ostracized PC1 Designer
Still Ruminates \'Why?\'". _PC Magazine_. p. 33. Retrieved 25 October
* ^ Maher, Jeannette A. (May–June 1982). "Boca Boo-Boo". _PC
Magazine_. p. 10. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ Bradley, David J. (September 1990).
"The Creation of the
IBM PC". _BYTE_. pp. 414–420. Retrieved 2 April
* ^ McCoy, Frank (2000-01-03). "Mark Dean / He refined the desktop
PC. Now he wants to kill it". _US News and World Report_. Archived
from the original on 2012-10-20. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ Bunnell, David (April–May 1982).
"Boca Diary". _PC Magazine_. p. 22. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
* ^ Cringely, Robert X. (1996). _Accidental Empires_.
HarperCollins. p. 121. ISBN 0887308554 .
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ Sanger, David E. (1984-04-22). "The Heady
World of I.B.M. Suppliers". _The New York Times_. ISSN 0362-4331 .
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ Curran, Lawrence J., Shuford, Richard S.
(November 1983). "IBM\'s Estridge". _BYTE_. pp. 88–97. Retrieved 19
March 2016. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link )
* ^ Freiberger, Paul (1982-08-23). "Bill Gates,
Microsoft and the
IBM Personal Computer". _InfoWorld_. p. 22. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ ″28th Annual Design Review″, _I.D. Magazine_,
IBM Personal Computer, Tom Hardy : Industrial
* ^ Magid, Lawrence J. (2001-08-09). "The Start of a Love-Hate
Affair With a Computer". _Los Angeles Times_. Retrieved 10 January
* ^ Rosenberg, Ronald (1984-04-24). "The Secret World of IBM". _The
* ^ Maher, Jimmy (2013-07-18). "The Unmaking and Remaking of Sierra
On-Line". The Digital Antiquarian. Retrieved 5 February 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ "Presenting the
IBM of Personal Computers.". _PC
Magazine_ (Advertisement). February–March 1982. pp. Inside front
cover. Retrieved 20 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ _H_ _I_ _J_ Lemmons, Phil (October
IBM Personal Computer / First Impressions". _BYTE_. p. 36.
Retrieved 19 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ "
IBM Introduces Its New Personal Computer Line".
_Santa Cruz Sentinel_. Associated Press. 1981-08-13. p. 41. Retrieved
6 October 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ Williams, Gregg (January 1982). "A Closer
Look at the
IBM Personal Computer". _BYTE_. p. 36. Retrieved 19
* ^ "My own
IBM computer. Imagine that.". _BYTE_ (Advertisement).
January 1982. p. 61. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
* ^ Cook, Karen (1984-04-03). "Now Pitching for IBM...Billy
Martin?". _PC Magazine_. p. 34. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Porter, Martin (July 1983). "That\'s Why The PC Is
A Tramp". _PC Magazine_. p. 328. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Papson, Stephen (April 1990). "The
_Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media_ (35): 66–72.
* ^ _A_ _B_ Caputi, Jane (1994). "IBM\'s Charlie Chaplin: A Case
Study". In Maasik, Sonia; Solomon, Jack. _Signs of Life in the U.S.A.:
Readings on Popular Culture for Writers_. Boston: Bedford Books. pp.
* ^ "Right away, you can see a difference.". _BYTE_
(Advertisement). August 1982. pp. 206–207. Retrieved 19 October
* ^ "New From CompuSoft / Learning
IBM BASIC For the Personal
Computer". _PC Magazine_ (Advertisement). November 1982. p. 66.
Retrieved 21 October 2013.
* ^ "NEC\'s New Advanced Personal Computer Gives Charlie the
Blues.". _Computerworld_ (Advertisement). 1982-08-30. p. 81. Retrieved
21 October 2013.
* ^ "Media Magician". _PC Magazine_ (Advertisement). February 1983.
p. 372. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
* ^ Cook, Karen (1984-03-06). "Lampoon Does
IBM Double Take, Turns
Little Tramp to Great Dictator". _PC Magazine_. p. 43. Retrieved 24
* ^ Dickinson, John (1984-09-18). "IBM\'s Displaywriter Begets a
Family of PC Software". _PC_. p. 238. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
* ^ Bunnell, David (Feb–Mar 1982). "The Man Behind The Machine?".
_PC Magazine_ (interview). p. 16. Retrieved February 17, 2012.
* ^ Green, Wayne (1980-08). "Publisher\'s Remarks". _Kilobaud_. p.
8. Retrieved 23 June 2014. Check date values in: date= (help )
* ^ _A_ _B_ Pournelle, Jerry (July 1982). "Computers for Humanity".
_BYTE_. p. 396. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
* ^ Mitchell, Peter W. (1983-09-06). "A summer-CES report". _Boston
Phoenix_. p. 4. Retrieved 10 January 2015.
* ^ McEntire, Norman (June–July 1982). "The Key to the PC". _PC
Magazine_. pp. 139–140. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
* ^ "Because we put what you want into it, you get what you want
out of it.". _BYTE_ (advertisement). December 1981. pp. 20–21.
Retrieved 12 August 2015.
* ^ "The best software for the
IBM Personal Computer. Could it be
yours?". _BYTE_ (Advertisement). September 1982. pp. 116–117.
Retrieved 19 October 2013.
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Freiberger, Paul (1981-10-05). "Some Confusion at
the Heart of
IBM Microcomputer / Which Operating System Will
Prevail?". _InfoWorld_. pp. 50–51. Retrieved 1 January 2015.
* ^ "
IBM directory lists software". _Computerworld_. 1984-11-12. p.
53. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
* ^ "Read Only". _PC_ (Advertisement). 1985-08-20. pp. 151–154.
Retrieved 5 January 2015.
* ^ Freiberger, Paul; Swaine, Michael (2000). _Fire in the Valley:
The Making of the Personal Computer_. McGraw-Hill Book. p. 348. ISBN
* ^ "Billion Dollar Baby". _PC_. Feb–Mar 1982. p. 5. Retrieved 25
* ^ Bunnell, David (1982-02-03). "Flying Upside Down". _PC
Magazine_. p. 10. Retrieved 6 April 2014.
* ^ Freiberger, Paul (1981-10-05). "Old-Timers Claim
Doesn\'t Scare Them". _InfoWorld_. p. 5. Retrieved 1 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ Maher, Jimmy (2017-07-31). "The complete history of the
IBM PC, part two: The
DOS empire strikes". _Ars Technica_. Retrieved
* ^ _A_ _B_ Rosen Research (1981-11-30). "From the Rosen
Electronics Letter / IBM\'s impact on microcomputer manufacturers".
_InfoWorld_. pp. 86–87. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
* ^ Markoff, John (1982-07-05). "Radio Shack: set apart from the
rest of the field". _InfoWorld_. p. 36. Retrieved 10 February 2015.
* ^ Lundell, Allan (1981-08-31). "
TRS-80 Outcrop Companies Evolve".
_InfoWorld_. pp. 46–47. Retrieved 15 February 2015.
* ^ Fastie, Will (June 1983). "The Graphical PC". _PC Magazine_.
* ^ _A_ _B_ Isaacson, Walter (2013). _Steve Jobs_. Simon and
Schuster. p. 135,149. ISBN 1451648545 .
* ^ Dvorak, John C. (1983-11-28). "Inside Track". _InfoWorld_. p.
188. Retrieved 23 March 2016.
* ^ Edlin, Jim; Bunnell, David (February–March 1982). "IBM\'s New
Personal Computer: Taking the Measure / Part One". _PC Magazine_. p.
42. Retrieved 20 October 2013.
* ^ Edlin, Jim (February–March 1982). "TecMates /
a plug-in smorgasbord". _PC Magazine_. pp. 57–58. Retrieved 20
* ^ _A_ _B_ Watt, Peggy; McGeever, Christine (1985-01-14).
IBM PC At One Year". _InfoWorld_. pp. 16–17.
Retrieved 28 December 2014.
* ^ Markoff, John (1982-08-23). "Competition and innovation mark
IBM add-in market". _InfoWorld_. p. 20. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
* ^ "Front cover". _PC_. December 1983. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
* ^ Burton, Kathleen (1983-03). "Anatomy of a Colossus, Part III".
_PC_. p. 467. Retrieved 30 March 2014. Check date values in: date=
* ^ _A_ _B_ Sanger, David E. (1985-08-05). "Philip Estridge Dies in
Jet Crash; Guided
IBM Personal Computer". _The New York Times_.
Retrieved 19 October 2013.
* ^ Ahl, David H. (March 1984). "Digital". _Creative Computing_.
pp. 38–41. Retrieved 6 February 2015.
* ^ Hayes, Thomas C. (1983-10-24). "Eagle Computer Stays in the
Race". _The New York Times_. Retrieved 10 January 2015.
* ^ Pournelle, Jerry (January 1984). "Too Many Leads, or What in
*;?!#"*? Goes First?". _BYTE_. p. 61. Retrieved 20 January 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ Whitmore, Sam (November 1983). "Fermentations".
_inCider_. p. 10. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
* ^ Curran, Lawrence J. (Feb 1984). "The Compatibility Craze".
_BYTE_. p. 4. Retrieved 26 August 2015.
* ^ _A_ _B_ Lemmons, Phil (Fall 1984). "
IBM and Its Personal
Computers". _BYTE_. p. 1. Retrieved 18 March 2016.
* ^ Sanger, David E. (1984-11-19). "I.B.M. Entry Unchallenged at
Show". _The New York Times_. ISSN 0362-4331 . Retrieved 2017-07-03.
* ^ "1983 Apple Keynote: The "1984" Ad Introduction".
April 1, 2006. Retrieved January 22, 2014.
* ^ Libes, Sol (September 1985). "The Top Ten". _BYTE_. p. 418.
Retrieved 27 October 2013.
* ^ "
IBM Personal Computers At a Glance". _BYTE_. Fall 1984. pp.
10–26. Retrieved 18 March 2016.
* ^ Kennedy, Don (1985-04-16). "PCs Rated Number One". _PC
Magazine_. p. 42. Retrieved 28 October 2013.
* ^ Killen, Michael (Fall 1984). "
IBM Forecast / Market Dominance".
_BYTE_. pp. 30–38. Retrieved 18 March 2016.
* ^ Bartimo, Jim (1984-11-05). "Mainframe BUNCH Goes Micro".
_InfoWorld_. pp. 47–50. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
* ^ Mace, Scott (1981-10-05). "Where You Can Go to Purchase the New
Computers". _InfoWorld_. p. 49. Retrieved 1 January 2015.
IBM did not offer own brand cassette recorders, but the 5150
had a cassette player jack, and
IBM anticipated that entry level home
users would connect their own cassette recorders for data storage
instead of using the more expensive floppy drives (and use their
existing TV sets as monitors); to this end,
IBM initially offered the
5150 in a basic configuration without any floppy drives or monitor at
the price of $1,565, whereas they offered a system with a monitor and
single floppy drive for an initial $3,005. Few if any users however
IBM 5150 PCs without floppy drives.
* ^ Scott Mueller, _Upgrading and Repairing PCs, 2nd Ed_, Que Books
1992,ISBN 0-88022-856-3 , page 94
* ^ "Dual-Head operation on vintage PCs".
* ^ Scott Mueller _Upgrading and Repairing PCs, Second Edition_,
Que Books, 1992, ISBN 0-88022-856-3 page 48
* ^ Whence Came the
IBM PC Test and Measurement World, retrieved
* ^ Gene Smart and Andrew Reinhardt, _15 years of Bits, Bytes and
Other Great Moments_, _
BYTE Magazine _, September 1990 pg. 382
* ^ "Howard81.co.uk".
* ^ "Howard81.co.uk".
* ^ Corestore.org
* ^ Muller, Guide to repairing and upgrading PCs 6th edition
* ^ i.e. 33% more speed, 50% more disk space
* ^ PC Magazine, Sept. 30, 1986, pp. 179-184
* ^ The opening sentence of an April 29, 1986
PC Magazine article
reads "If you own an
IBM PC AT and your hard disk hasn't crashed yet,
don't worry -- it probably will." highbeam.com some signal levels that
are valid for a TTL high state, and all signal levels that represent a
TTL low state, fall within the forbidden range of -3 to +3 volts for
standard RS-232. (However, it is not difficult to design and construct
a level converter that will convert between
IBM serial port and
IBM (July 1982). _Technical Reference: Personal Computer
Hardware Reference Library_ (Revised ed.).
IBM Corp. pp. 2–93.
* ^ Sometimes the tracks were also referred as cylinders, which is
technically correct and analogous to hard drive cylinders. One floppy
disk track equaled one cylinder, however with double-sided floppies,
only the first side's cylinder numbers were identical to the track
numbers; on the second side, the cylinders 1-40 corresponded to tracks
41-80 of the formatted floppy.
* ^ 163,840 bytes, i.e. 512 bytes × 8 sectors × 40 tracks on the
one side used
* ^ 327,680 bytes, i.e. 512 bytes × 8 sectors × 40 tracks × 2
* ^ 184,320 bytes, i.e. 512 bytes × 9 sectors × 40 tracks on the
one side used
* ^ 368,640 bytes, i.e. 512 bytes × 9 sectors × 40 tracks × 2
* ^ Edlin, Jim (June–July 1982). "
CP/M Arrives". _PC Magazine_.
p. 43. Retrieved 21 October 2013.
* ^ "PCommuniques". _PC Magazine_. February 1983. p. 53. Retrieved
21 October 2013.
* ^ "Can You Do Real Work With the 30-Year-Old
* Norton, Peter (1986). _Inside the
IBM PC. Revised and enlarged_.
New York. Brady. ISBN 0-89303-583-1 .
* August 12, 1981 press release announcing the
IBM PC (
* Mueller, Scott (1992). _Upgrading and Repairing PCs, Second
Edition_, Que Books, ISBN 0-88022-856-3
* Chposky, James; Ted Leonsis (1988). _Blue Magic - The People,
Power and Politics Behind the
IBM Personal Computer_. Facts On File.
ISBN 0-8160-1391-8 .
IBM (1983). _Personal Computer Hardware Reference Library: Guide
to Operations, Personal Computer XT_.
IBM Part Number 6936831.
IBM (1984). _Personal Computer Hardware Reference Library: Guide
to Operations, Portable Personal Computer_.
IBM Part Numbers 6936571
IBM (1986). _Personal Computer Hardware Reference Library: Guide
to Operations, Personal Computer XT Model 286_.
IBM Part Number
* This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line
Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated
under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL , version 1.3 or later.
* "Birth of the
IBM Corporation History Archives website
Wikimedia Commons has media related to
IBM PERSONAL COMPUTER _.
IBM 5150 information at www.minuszerodegrees.net
IBM PC 5150 System Disks and ROMs
IBM PC from IT