HERODOTUS (/hᵻˈrɒdətəs/ ;
Ancient Greek : Ἡρόδοτος,
Attic Greek pronunciation: ) was a Greek historian who
was born in
Halicarnassus in the
Persian Empire (modern-day
Turkey ) and lived in the fifth century BC (c. 484–c. 425 BC), a
Socrates , and
Euripides . He is often
referred to as "The Father of History", a title first conferred by
Cicero ; he was the first historian known to have broken from Homeric
tradition to treat historical subjects as a method of
investigation—specifically, by collecting his materials
systematically and critically, and then arranging them into a
_The Histories _ is the only work which he is known to have produced,
a record of his "inquiry" (ἱστορία _historía_ ) on the
origins of the
Greco-Persian Wars ; it primarily deals with the lives
Croesus , Cyrus , Cambyses , Smerdis , Darius , and Xerxes and the
battles of Marathon , Thermopylae , Artemisium , Salamis , Plataea ,
and Mycale ; however, its many cultural, ethnographical ,
geographical, historiographical , and other degressions form a
defining and essential part of the _Histories_ and contain a wealth of
information. Some of his stories are fanciful and others inaccurate;
yet he states that he is reporting only what he was told; a sizable
portion of the information he provided was later confirmed by
historians and archaeologists. Despite Herodotus' historical
significance, little is known of his personal life.
* 1 Place in history
* 1.1 Predecessors
* 1.2 Writing style
* 1.3 Contemporary and modern critics
* 2 Life
* 2.1 Childhood
* 2.2 Early travels
* 2.3 Later life
* 2.4 Author and orator
* 3 Reliability
* 3.1 Egypt
* 3.2 Science
* 3.3 Accusations of bias
* 3.4 Herodotus\'s use of sources and sense of authority
* 4 Mode of explanation
* 4.1 Types of causality
Herodotus and myth
* 6 See also
* 7 Critical editions
* 8 Translations
* 9 Notes
* 10 References
* 10.1 Sources
* 11 Further reading
* 12 External links
PLACE IN HISTORY
Herodotus announced the size and scope of his work at the beginning
of his _Researches_ or _Histories_:
Here are presented the results of the enquiry carried out by
Halicarnassus . The purpose is to prevent the traces of
human events from being erased by time, and to preserve the fame of
the important and remarkable achievements produced by both
non-Greeks; among the matters covered is, in particular, the cause of
the hostilities between
Greeks and non-Greeks. — Herodotus, _The
Robin Waterfield translation (2008)
His record of the achievements of others was an achievement in
itself, though the extent of it has been debated. Herodotus' place in
history and his significance may be understood according to the
traditions within which he worked. His work is the earliest Greek
prose to have survived intact. However, Dionysius of
Halicarnassus , a
literary critic of Augustan Rome , listed seven predecessors of
Herodotus, describing their works as simple, unadorned accounts of
their own and other cities and people, Greek or foreign, including
popular legends, sometimes melodramatic and naïve, often charming –
all traits that can be found in the work of
Modern historians regard the chronology as uncertain, but according
to the ancient account, these predecessors included Dionysius of
Miletus, Charon of Lampsacus,
Hellanicus of Lesbos , Xanthus of Lydia
and, the best attested of them all,
Hecataeus of Miletus . Of these,
only fragments of Hecataeus's works survived, and the authenticity of
these is debatable, but they provide a glimpse into the kind of
tradition within which
Herodotus wrote his own _Histories_.
In his introduction to Hecataeus's work, _Genealogies_: _
Fragment from the Histories_ VIII on
Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 2099, early
2nd century AD
Hecataeus the Milesian speaks thus: I write these things as they seem
true to me; for the stories told by the
Greeks are various and in my
This points forward to the "folksy" yet "international" outlook
typical of Herodotus. However, one modern scholar has described the
work of Hecataeus as "a curious false start to history", since
despite his critical spirit, he failed to liberate history from myth.
Herodotus mentions Hecataeus in his _Histories_, on one occasion
mocking him for his naive genealogy and, on another occasion, quoting
Athenian complaints against his handling of their national history.
It is possible that
Herodotus borrowed much material from Hecataeus,
as stated by Porphyry in a quote recorded by
Eusebius . In
particular, it is possible that he copied descriptions of the
crocodile , hippopotamus , and phoenix from Hecataeus's
_Circumnavigation of the Known World_ (_Periegesis_ / _Periodos ges_),
even misrepresenting the source as "Heliopolitans" (_Histories_ 2.73).
But Hecataeus did not record events that had occurred in living
memory, unlike Herodotus, nor did he include the oral traditions of
Greek history within the larger framework of oriental history. There
is no proof that
Herodotus derived the ambitious scope of his own
work, with its grand theme of civilizations in conflict, from any
predecessor, despite much scholarly speculation about this in modern
Herodotus claims to be better informed than his predecessors
by relying on empirical observation to correct their excessive
schematism. For example, he argues for continental asymmetry as
opposed to the older theory of a perfectly circular earth with Europe
Africa equal in size (_Histories_ 4.36 and 4.42). However, he
retains idealizing tendencies, as in his symmetrical notions of the
His debt to previous authors of prose "histories" might be
questionable, but there is no doubt that
Herodotus owed much to the
example and inspiration of poets and story-tellers. For example,
Athenian tragic poets provided him with a world-view of a balance
between conflicting forces, upset by the hubris of kings, and they
provided his narrative with a model of episodic structure. His
familiarity with Athenian tragedy is demonstrated in a number of
Aeschylus 's _
Persae _, including the epigrammatic
observation that the defeat of the Persian navy at Salamis caused the
defeat of the land army (_Histories_ 8.68 ~ _Persae_ 728). The debt
may have been repaid by
Sophocles because there appear to be echoes of
_The Histories_ in his plays, especially a passage in _
Antigone _ that
resembles Herodotus's account of the death of Intaphernes (_Histories_
3.119 ~ _Antigone_ 904-920). However, this point is one of the most
contentious issues in modern scholarship.
Homer was another inspirational source. Just as
extensively on a tradition of oral poetry, sung by wandering
Herodotus appears to have drawn on an Ionian tradition
of story-telling, collecting and interpreting the oral histories he
chanced upon in his travels. These oral histories often contained
folk-tale motifs and demonstrated a moral, yet they also contained
substantial facts relating to geography, anthropology, and history,
all compiled by
Herodotus in an entertaining style and format.
CONTEMPORARY AND MODERN CRITICS
It is on account of the many strange stories and the folk-tales he
reported that his critics in early modern times branded him "The
Father of Lies". Even his own contemporaries found reason to scoff
at his achievement. In fact, one modern scholar has wondered if
Herodotus left his home in Greek
Anatolia , migrating westwards to
Athens and beyond, because his own countrymen had ridiculed his work,
a circumstance possibly hinted at in an epitaph said to have been
Herodotus at one of his three supposed resting places,
Herodotus the son of Sphynx
lies; in Ionic history without peer;
a Dorian born, who fled from slander's brand
and made in Thuria his new native land.
Yet it was in Athens where his most formidable contemporary critics
could be found. In 425 BC, which is about the time that
thought by many scholars to have died, the Athenian comic dramatist
Aristophanes created _
The Acharnians _, in which he blames the
Peloponnesian War on the abduction of some prostitutes – a mocking
reference to Herodotus, who reported the Persians' account of their
wars with Greece , beginning with the rapes of the mythical heroines
Io , Europa ,
Medea , and Helen .
Similarly, the Athenian historian
Herodotus as a
"logos-writer" (story-teller). Thucydides, who had been trained in
rhetoric, became the model for subsequent prose-writers as an author
who seeks to appear firmly in control of his material, whereas with
his frequent digressions
Herodotus appeared to minimize (or possibly
disguise) his authorial control. Moreover,
Thucydides developed a
historical topic more in keeping with the Greek world-view: focused on
the context of the _polis _ or city-state. The interplay of
civilizations was more relevant to
Greeks living in Anatolia, such as
Herodotus himself, for whom life within a foreign civilization was a
Before the Persian crisis, history had been represented among the
Greeks only by local or family traditions. The "Wars of Liberation"
had given to
Herodotus the first genuinely historical inspiration felt
by a Greek. These wars showed him that there was a corporate life,
higher than that of the city, of which the story might be told; and
they offered to him as a subject the drama of the collision between
East and West. With him, the spirit of history was born into Greece;
and his work, called after the nine Muses, was indeed the first
Clio . —
Richard Claverhouse Jebb
Jean-Guillaume Moitte (1806),
Modern scholars generally turn to Herodotus's own writing for
reliable information about his life, supplemented with ancient yet
much later sources, such as the Byzantine _
Suda _, an 11th century
encyclopaedia which possibly took its information from traditional
The data are so few – they rest upon such late and slight
authority; they are so improbable or so contradictory, that to compile
them into a biography is like building a house of cards, which the
first breath of criticism will blow to the ground. Still, certain
points may be approximately fixed ... —
Modern accounts of his life typically go something like this:
Herodotus was born at
Halicarnassus around 484 BC. There is no reason
to disbelieve the _Suda_'s information about his family: that it was
influential and that he was the son of Lyxes and Dryo, and the brother
of Theodorus, and that he was also related to
Panyassis – an epic
poet of the time. The town was within the
Persian Empire at that time,
Herodotus a Persian subject, and it may be that the young
Herodotus heard local eye-witness accounts of events within the empire
and of Persian preparations for the invasion of Greece, including the
movements of the local fleet under the command of Artemisia .
Inscriptions recently discovered at
Halicarnassus indicate that her
grandson Lygdamis negotiated with a local assembly to settle disputes
over seized property, which is consistent with a tyrant under
pressure. His name is not mentioned later in the tribute list of the
Delian League , indicating that there might well have been a
successful uprising against him some time before 454 BC. The epic poet
Panyassis – a relative of
Herodotus – is reported to have taken
part in a failed uprising.
Herodotus expresses affection for the
Samos (III, 39–60), and this is an indication that he
might have lived there in his youth. So it is possible that his family
was involved in an uprising against Lygdamis, leading to a period of
Samos and followed by some personal hand in the tyrant’s
eventual fall. The statue of
Herodotus in his hometown of
Halicarnassus , modern
Bodrum , Turkey.
Herodotus wrote his _Histories_ in the Ionian dialect, yet he was
born in Halicarnassus, which was a Dorian settlement. According to the
Herodotus learned the Ionian dialect as a boy living on the
Samos , to which he had fled with his family from the
oppressions of Lygdamis , tyrant of
Halicarnassus and grandson of
Artemisia I of
Caria . The _Suda_ also informs us that
returned home to lead the revolt that eventually overthrew the tyrant.
Due to recent discoveries of inscriptions at
Halicarnassus dated to
about Herodotus's time, we now know that the Ionic dialect was used in
Halicarnassus in some official documents, so there is no need to
assume (like the _Suda_) that he must have learned the dialect
elsewhere. Further, the _Suda_ is the only source which we have for
the role played by
Herodotus as the heroic liberator of his
birthplace. That itself is a good reason to doubt such a romantic
Herodotus himself reveals,
Halicarnassus , though a Dorian city ,
had ended its close relations with its Dorian neighbours after an
unseemly quarrel (I, 144), and it had helped pioneer Greek trade with
Egypt (II, 178). It was, therefore, an outward-looking,
international-minded port within the
Persian Empire , and the
historian’s family could well have had contacts in other countries
under Persian rule, facilitating his travels and his researches.
Herodotus's eye-witness accounts indicate that he traveled in Egypt
in association with Athenians, probably some time after 454 BC or
possibly earlier, after an Athenian fleet had assisted the uprising
against Persian rule in 460–454 BC. He probably traveled to Tyre
next and then down the
Babylon . For some reason,
possibly associated with local politics, he subsequently found himself
unpopular in Halicarnassus, and some time around 447 BC, migrated to
Periclean Athens – a city whose people and democratic institutions
he openly admires (V, 78). Athens was also the place where he came to
know the local topography (VI, 137; VIII, 52–5), as well as leading
citizens such as the
Alcmaeonids , a clan whose history features
frequently in his writing.
Herodotus was granted a
financial reward by the Athenian assembly in recognition of his work.
It is possible that he unsuccessfully applied for Athenian
citizenship, a rare honour after 451 BC, requiring two separate votes
by a well-attended assembly.
In 443 BC or shortly afterwards, he migrated to
Thurium as part of an
Aristotle refers to a version of _The
Histories_ written by “
Herodotus of Thurium”, and indeed some
passages in the _Histories_ have been interpreted as proof that he
wrote about southern Italy from personal experience there (IV, 15,99;
VI, 127). Intimate knowledge of some events in the first years of the
Peloponnesian War (VI, 91; VII, 133, 233; IX, 73) indicate that he
might have returned to Athens, in which case it is possible that he
died there during an outbreak of the plague. Possibly he died in
Macedonia instead, after obtaining the patronage of the court there;
or else he died back in Thurium. There is nothing in the _Histories_
that can be dated to later than 430 BC with any certainty, and it is
generally assumed that he died not long afterwards, possibly before
his sixtieth year.
AUTHOR AND ORATOR
Herodotus would have made his researches known to the larger world
through oral recitations to a public crowd. John Marincola writes in
his introduction to the Penguin edition of _The Histories_ that there
are certain identifiable pieces in the early books of Herodotus’
work which could be labeled as “performance pieces”. These
portions of the research seem independent and “almost detachable”,
so that they might have been set aside by the author for the purposes
of an oral performance. The intellectual matrix of the 5th century,
Marincola suggests, comprised many oral performances in which
philosophers would dramatically recite such detachable pieces of their
work. The idea was to criticize previous arguments on a topic and
emphatically and enthusiastically insert their own in order to win
over the audience.
It was conventional in Herodotus’s day for authors to ‘publish’
their works by reciting them at popular festivals. According to Lucian
Herodotus took his finished work straight from
Anatolia to the
Olympic Games and read the entire _Histories_ to the assembled
spectators in one sitting, receiving rapturous applause at the end of
it. According to a very different account by an ancient grammarian,
Herodotus refused to begin reading his work at the festival of Olympia
until some clouds offered him a bit of shade – by which time the
assembly had dispersed. (Hence the proverbial expression ‘_Herodotus
and his shade_’ to describe someone who misses an opportunity
through delay.) Herodotus’s recitation at Olympia was a favourite
theme among ancient writers, and there is another interesting
variation on the story to be found in the _Suda_: that of Photius
Tzetzes , in which a young
Thucydides happened to be in the
assembly with his father, and burst into tears during the recital.
Herodotus observed prophetically to the boy’s father, “Your
son’s soul yearns for knowledge.”
Herodotus became close enough for both to
be interred in Thucydides’ tomb in Athens. Such at least was the
opinion of Marcellinus in his _Life of Thucydides_. According to the
Suda _, he was buried in Macedonian
Pella and in the agora in Thurium
Dedication in the Histories_, translated into Latin by Lorenzo
Valla , Venice 1494
_The Histories_ were occasionally criticized in antiquity, but
modern historians and philosophers generally take a positive view.
Despite the controversy,
Herodotus still serves as the primary, and
often only, source for events in the Greek world, Persian Empire, and
the region generally in the two centuries leading up until his own
day. Herodotus, like many ancient historians, preferred an element
of show to purely analytic history, aiming to give pleasure with
"exciting events, great dramas, bizarre exotica." As such, certain
passages have been the subject of controversy and even some doubt,
both in antiquity and today.
The accuracy of the works of
Herodotus has been controversial since
his own era.
Josephus , Duris of
Plutarch all commented on this controversy.
Generally, however, he was regarded as reliable in antiquity, and is
especially so today. Many scholars, ancient and modern, routinely cite
Herodotus (e.g., Aubin,
A. H. L. Heeren , Davidson,
Cheikh Anta Diop ,
Poe, Welsby, Celenko, Volney,
Pierre Montet , Bernal, Jackson, DuBois,
Strabo ). Many of these scholars (Welsby, Heeren, Aubin, Diop, etc.)
explicitly mention the reliability of Herodotus's work and
demonstrate corroboration of Herodotus's writings by modern scholars.
A. H. L. Heeren quoted
Herodotus throughout his work and provided
corroboration by scholars regarding several passages (source of the
Nile, location of Meroe, etc.). To further his work on the Egyptians
and Assyrians, Aubin uses Herodotus's accounts in various passages and
defends Herodotus's position. Aubin said that
Herodotus was "the
author of the first important narrative history of the world". Diop
provides several examples (the inundations of the Nile) which, he
argues, support his view that
Herodotus was "quite scrupulous,
objective, scientific for his time." Diop argues that Herodotus
"always distinguishes carefully between what he has seen and what he
has been told." Diop also notes that
Strabo corroborated Herodotus's
ideas about the Black Egyptians, Ethiopians, and Colchians.
Reconstruction of the
Oikoumene (inhabited world), ancient map based
on Herodotus, c. 450 BC
The reliability of
Herodotus is sometimes criticized when writing
about Egypt. Alan B. Lloyd argues that, as a historical document,
the writings of
Herodotus are seriously defective, and that he was
working from "inadequate sources". Nielsen writes: "Though we cannot
entirely rule out the possibility of
Herodotus having been in Egypt,
it must be said that his narrative bears little witness to it."
German historian Detlev Fehling questions whether
traveled up the
Nile River, and considers doubtful almost everything
that he says about Egypt and Ethiopia. Fehling states that "there is
not the slightest bit of history behind the whole story" about the
Herodotus that Pharaoh
Sesostris campaigned in Europe, and
that he left a colony in Colchia.
Gold dust and nuggets
Herodotus provides much information about the nature of the world and
the status of science during his lifetime, often engaging in private
speculation. For example, he reports that the annual flooding of the
Nile was said to be the result of melting snows far to the south, and
he comments that he cannot understand how there can be snow in Africa,
the hottest part of the known world, offering an elaborate explanation
based on the way that desert winds affect the passage of the Sun over
this part of the world (2:18ff). He also passes on reports from
Phoenician sailors that, while circumnavigating
Africa , they "saw the
sun on the right side while sailing westwards". Owing to this brief
mention, which is included almost as an afterthought, it has been
Africa was indeed circumnavigated by ancient seafarers,
for this is precisely where the sun ought to have been. His accounts
of India are among the oldest records of Indian civilization by an
Discoveries made since the end of the 19th century have generally
added to Herodotus's credibility. He described
Gelonus , located in
Scythia , as a city thousands of times larger than
Troy ; this was
widely disbelieved until it was rediscovered in 1975. The
archaeological study of the now-submerged ancient Egyptian city of
Heracleion and the recovery of the so-called "Naucratis stela" give
credibility to Herodotus's previously unsupported claim that
Heracleion was founded during the Egyptian
New Kingdom . _ Croesus
Receiving Tribute from a Lydian Peasant_, by
After journeys to India and Pakistan, French ethnologist Michel
Peissel claimed to have discovered an animal species that may
illuminate one of the most bizarre passages in Herodotus's Histories.
In Book 3, passages 102 to 105,
Herodotus reports that a species of
fox-sized, furry "ants " lives in one of the far eastern, Indian
provinces of the
Persian Empire . This region, he reports, is a sandy
desert, and the sand there contains a wealth of fine gold dust. These
giant ants, according to Herodotus, would often unearth the gold dust
when digging their mounds and tunnels, and the people living in this
province would then collect the precious dust. Peissel reports that,
in an isolated region of northern Pakistan on the Deosai Plateau in
Gilgit–Baltistan province, there is a species of marmot – the
Himalayan marmot , a type of burrowing squirrel – that may have been
Herodotus called giant ants. The ground of the Deosai Plateau is
rich in gold dust, much like the province that
According to Peissel, he interviewed the Minaro tribal people who live
in the Deosai Plateau, and they have confirmed that they have, for
generations, been collecting the gold dust that the marmots bring to
the surface when they are digging their underground burrows. Later
authors such as
Pliny the Elder mentioned this story in the gold
mining section of his _
Naturalis Historia _. The Himalayan marmot
Peissel offers the theory that
Herodotus may have confused the old
Persian word for "marmot" with the word for "mountain ant". Research
Herodotus probably did not know any Persian (or any
other language except his native Greek) and was forced to rely on many
local translators when travelling in the vast multilingual Persian
Herodotus did not claim to have personally seen the creatures
which he described.
Herodotus did, though, follow up in passage 105
of Book 3 with the claim that the "ants" are said to chase and devour
ACCUSATIONS OF BIAS
Some "calumnious fictions" were written about
Herodotus in a work
On the Malice of Herodotus _ by
Plutarch , a Chaeronean by
birth, (or it might have been a Pseudo-
Plutarch , in this case "a
great collector of slanders"), including the allegation that the
historian was prejudiced against Thebes because the authorities there
had denied him permission to set up a school. Similarly, in a
Dio Chrysostom (or yet another pseudonymous
author) accused the historian of prejudice against Corinth , sourcing
it in personal bitterness over financial disappointments – an
account also given by Marcellinus in his _Life of Thucydides_. In
Herodotus was in the habit of seeking out information from
empowered sources within communities, such as aristocrats and priests,
and this also occurred at an international level, with Periclean
Athens becoming his principal source of information about events in
Greece. As a result, his reports about Greek events are often coloured
by Athenian bias against rival states – Thebes and Corinth in
_The Histories_ were sometimes criticized in antiquity, but modern
historians and philosophers take a more positive view of Herodotus's
methodology, especially those searching for a paradigm of objective
historical writing. A few modern scholars have argued that Herodotus
exaggerated the extent of his travels and invented his sources, yet
his reputation continues largely intact.
Herodotus is variously
considered "father of comparative anthropology", "the father of
ethnography", and "more modern than any other ancient historian in
his approach to the ideal of total history".
HERODOTUS\'S USE OF SOURCES AND SENSE OF AUTHORITY
It is clear from the beginning of Book 1 of the _Histories_ that
Herodotus utilizes (or at least claims to utilize) various sources in
his narrative. K.H. Waters relates that "Herodotos did not work from a
purely Hellenic standpoint; indeed, he was accused by the patriotic
but somewhat imperceptive
Plutarch of being _philobarbaros_, a
pro-barbarian or pro-foreigner."
Herodotus will at times relate various accounts of the same story.
For example, in Book 1 he mentions both the Phoenician and the Persian
accounts of Io. However,
Herodotus will at time arbitrate between
varying accounts: "I am not going to say that these events happened
one way or the other. Rather, I will point out the man _who I know for
a fact_ began the wrong-doing against the Greeks." Again, later,
Herodotus claims himself as an authority: "I know this is how it
happened because I heard it from the Delphians myself."
Throughout his work,
Herodotus attempts to explain the actions of
people. Speaking about the king,
Solon the Athenian,
" sailed away on the pretext of seeing the world, _but it was really
so that he could not be compelled to repeal any of the laws he had
laid down_." Again, in the story about
Croesus and his son's death,
when speaking of Adrastus (the man who accidentally killed Croesus'
Herodotus states: "Adrastus ... _believing himself to be the
most ill-fated man he had ever known_, cut his own throat over the
Herodotus had not met these people whom he is discussing, he
claims to understand their thoughts and intentions.
MODE OF EXPLANATION
Herodotus writes with the purpose of _explaining_; that is, he
discusses the reason for or cause of for an event. He lays this out in
the proem: "This is the publication of the research of
Halicarnassus, so that the actions of people shall not fade with time,
so that the great and admirable achievements of both
barbarians shall not go unrenowned, and, among other things, _to set
forth the reasons why they waged war on each other_."
This mode of explanation traces itself all the way back to Homer,
who opened the _Iliad_ by asking: _Which of the immortals set these
two at each other's throats?_ _Apollo,_ _Zeus’ son and Leto’s,
offended_ _by the warlord. Agamemnon had dishonored_ _Chryses,
Apollo's priest, so the god_ _struck the Greek camp with plague,_ _and
the soldiers were dying of it._
Herodotus begin with a question of causality. In
Homer's case, "_who set these two at each other's throats?_" In
Herodotus' case, "_Why did the
Greeks and barbarians go to war with
Herodotus' means of explanation does not necessarily posit a simple
cause; rather, his explanations cover a host of potential causes and
emotions. It is notable, however, that "the obligations of gratitude
and revenge are the fundamental human motives for Herodotus, just as
... they are the primary stimulus to the generation of narrative
Some readers of
Herodotus believe that his habit of tying events back
to personal motives signifies an inability to see broader and more
abstract reasons for action. Gould argues to the contrary that this is
Herodotus attempts to provide the rational reasons, as
understood by his contemporaries, rather than providing more abstract
TYPES OF CAUSALITY
Herodotus attributes cause to both divine and human agents. These are
not perceived as mutually exclusive, but rather mutually
interconnected. This is true of Greek thinking in general, at least
Homer onward. Gould notes that invoking the supernatural in
order to explain an event does not answer the question "why did this
happen?" but rather "why did this happen to me?" By way of example,
faulty craftsmanship is the human cause for a house collapsing.
However, divine will is the reason that the house collapses at the
particular moment when I am inside. It was the will of the gods that
the house collapsed while a particular individual was within it,
whereas it was the cause of man that the house had a weak structure
and was prone to falling.
Some authors, including Geoffrey de Ste Croix and Mabel Lang, have
argued that Fate, or the belief that "this is how it had to be," is
Herodotus' ultimate understanding of causality. Herodotus'
explanation that an event "was going to happen" maps well on to
Aristotelean and Homeric means of expression. The idea of "it was
going to happen" reveals a "tragic discovery" associated with
fifth-century drama. This tragic discovery can be seen in Homer's,
Iliad _ as well.
John Gould argues that
Herodotus should be understood as falling in a
long line of story-tellers, rather than thinking of his means of
explanation as a "philosophy of history" or "simple causality". Thus,
according to Gould, Herodotus' means of explanation is a mode of
story-telling and narration that has been passed down from generations
Herodotus' sense of what was 'going to happen' is not the language of
one who holds a theory of historical necessity, who sees the whole of
human experience as constrained by inevitability and without room for
human choice or human responsibility, diminished and belittled by
forces too large for comprehension or resistance; it is rather the
traditional language of a teller of tales whose tale is structured by
his awareness of the shape it must have and who presents human
experience on the model of the narrative patterns that are built into
his stories; the narrative impulse itself, the impulse towards
'closure' and the sense of an ending, is retrojected to become
HERODOTUS AND MYTH
Herodotus considered his "inquiries" a serious pursuit of
knowledge, he was not above relating entertaining tales derived from
the collective body of myth, but he did so judiciously with regard for
his historical method , by corroborating the stories through enquiry
and testing their probability. While the gods never make personal
appearances in his account of human events,
emphatically that "many things prove to me that the gods take part in
the affairs of man" (IX, 100).
In Book One, passages 23 and 24,
Herodotus relates the story of Arion
, the renowned harp player, "second to no man living at that time,"
who was saved by a dolphin.
Herodotus prefaces the story by noting
that "a very wonderful thing is said to have happened," and alleges
its veracity by adding that the "Corinthians and the Lesbians agree in
their account of the matter." Having become very rich while at the
court of Periander,
Arion conceived a desire to sail to Italy and
Sicily. He hired a vessel crewed by Corinthians, whom he felt he could
trust, but the sailors plotted to throw him overboard and seize his
Arion discovered the plot and begged for his life, but the
crew gave him two options: that either he kill himself on the spot or
jump ship and fend for himself in the sea.
Arion flung himself into
the water, and a dolphin carried him to shore.
Herodotus clearly writes as both historian and teller of tales.
Herodotus takes a fluid position between the artistic
Homer and the rational data-accounting of later
historians. John Herrington has developed a helpful metaphor for
describing Herodotus' dynamic position in the history of Western art
and thought –
Herodotus as centaur:
The human forepart of the animal ... is the urbane and responsible
classical historian; the body indissolubly united to it is something
out of the faraway mountains, out of an older, freer and wilder realm
where our conventions have no force.
Herodotus is neither a mere gatherer of data nor a simple teller of
tales – he is both. While
Herodotus is certainly concerned with
giving accurate accounts of events, this does not preclude for him the
insertion of powerful mythological elements into his narrative,
elements which will aid him in expressing the truth of matters under
his study. Thus to understand what
Herodotus is doing in the
_Histories_, we must not impose strict demarcations between the man as
mythologist and the man as historian, or between the work as myth and
the work as history. As James Romm has written,
Herodotus worked under
a common ancient Greek cultural assumption that the way events are
remembered and retold (e.g. in myths or legends) produces a valid kind
of understanding, even when this retelling is not entirely factual.
For Herodotus, then, it takes both myth and history to produce
Historiography (the history of history and historians)
Thucydides , ancient Greek historian who is also often said to be
"the father of history"
Pliny the Elder
Naturalis Historia _
* Battle of Thermopylae:
Herodotus and other Sources
The Herodotus Machine
* C. Hude (ed.) _Herodoti Historiae. Tomvs prior: Libros I-IV
continens._ (Oxford 1908)
* C. Hude (ed.) _Herodoti Historiae. Tomvs alter: Libri V-IX
continens._ (Oxford 1908)
* H. B. Rosén (ed.) _Herodoti Historiae. Vol. I: Libros I-IV
continens._ (Leipzig 1987)
* H. B. Rosén (ed.) _Herodoti Historiae. Vol. II: Libros V-IX
continens indicibus criticis adiectis_ (Stuttgart 1997)
* N. G. Wilson (ed.) _Herodoti Historiae. Tomvs prior: Libros I-IV
continens._ (Oxford 2015)
* N. G. Wilson (ed.) _Herodoti Historiae. Tomvs alter: Libri V-IX
continens._ (Oxford 2015)
Several English translations of _The Histories of Herodotus_ are
readily available in multiple editions. The most readily available are
those translated by:
George Rawlinson , translation 1858–1860. Public domain; many
editions available, although
Everyman Library and Wordsworth Classics
editions are the most common ones still in print.
A. D. Godley 1920; revised 1926. Reprinted 1931, 1946, 1960, 1966,
1975, 1981, 1990, 1996, 1999, 2004. Available in four volumes from
Loeb Classical Library ,
Harvard University Press . ISBN 0-674-99130-3
Printed with Greek on the left and English on the right:
A. D. Godley _
The Persian Wars : Volume I : Books
1–2_ (Cambridge, MA 1920)
A. D. Godley _
The Persian Wars : Volume II : Books
3–4_ (Cambridge, MA 1921)
A. D. Godley _
The Persian Wars : Volume III : Books
5–7_ (Cambridge, MA 1922)
A. D. Godley _
The Persian Wars : Volume IV : Books
8–9_ (Cambridge, MA 1925)
Aubrey de Sélincourt , originally 1954; revised by John
Marincola in 1996. Several editions from
Penguin Books available.
David Grene , Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Robin Waterfield , with an Introduction and Notes by Carolyn
Dewald, Oxford World Classics, 1997. ISBN 978-0-19-953566-8
* Strassler, Robert B., (ed.), and Purvis, Andrea L. (trans.), _The
Landmark Herodotus,_ Pantheon, 2007. ISBN 978-0-375-42109-9 with
adequate ancillary information.
* _The Histories of
Herodotus Interlinear English Translation_ by
Heinrich Stein (ed.) and George Macaulay (trans.), Lighthouse Digital
* Herodotus. _Herodotus: The Histories: The Complete Translation,
Backgrounds, Commentaries_. Translated by Walter Blanco. Edited by
Jennifer Tolbert Roberts. New York: W. W. Norton -webkit-column-width:
24em; column-width: 24em; list-style-type: lower-alpha;">
* ^ “In the scheme and plan of his work, in the arrangement and
order of its parts, in the tone and character of the thoughts, in ten
thousand little expressions and words, the Homeric student appears.”
* ^ See
Lucian of Samosata, who went as far as to deny him a place
among the famous on the Island of the Blessed in _Verae Historiae_.
* ^ Some regard his works as being at least partly unreliable.
Fehling writes of "a problem recognized by everybody", namely that
Herodotus frequently cannot be taken at face value.
* ^ Boedeker comments on Herodotus' use of literary devices.
* ^ For Detlev Fehling, the sources are simply not credible that
Herodotus claims for many stories that he reports. Persian and
Egyptian informants tell stories to
Herodotus that dovetail neatly
into Greek myths and literature, yet show no signs of knowing their
own traditions. For Fehling, the only credible explanation is that
Herodotus invented these sources, and that the stories themselves were
* ^ Kenton L. Sparks writes, "In antiquity,
Herodotus had acquired
the reputation of being unreliable, biased, parsimonious in his praise
of heroes, and mendacious".
Cicero (_On the Laws_ I.5) said that the works of Herodotus
were full of legends or "fables".
* ^ Duris of
Herodotus a myth-monger.
Harpocration wrote a book on "the lies of Herodotus".
* ^ such as on the
* ^ Welsby said that "archaeology graphically confirms Herodotus'
Herodotus claimed to have visited
Babylon . The absence of any
mention of the Hanging Gardens of
Babylon in his work has attracted
further attacks on his credibility. In response, Dalley has proposed
that the Hanging Gardens may have been in Ninevah rather than in
* ^ Fehling concludes that the works of
Herodotus are intended as
fiction. Boedeker concurs that much of the content of the works of
Herodotus are literary devices.
* ^ For example, they were criticized for inaccuracy by
Samosata, who attacked
Herodotus as a liar in _Verae Historiae_ and
went as far as to deny him a place among the famous on the Island of
* ^ T. James Luce, _The Greek Historians_, 2002, p. 26.
* ^ _
New Oxford American Dictionary _, "Herodotos", Oxford
* ^ Burn (1972) , p. 23, citing Dionysius _On Thucydides_
* ^ Burn (1972) , p. 27
* ^ _A_ _B_ Murray (1986) , p. 188
* ^ Herodotus, _Histories _ 2.143, 6.137
* ^ _Preparation of the Gospel_, X, 3
* ^ Immerwahr (1985) , pp. 430, 440
* ^ Immerwahr (1985) , p. 431
* ^ Burn (1972) , pp. 22–23
* ^ Immerwahr (1985) , p. 430
* ^ Immerwahr (1985) , pp. 427, 432
* ^ Richard Jebb (ed), _Antigone_, Cambridge University Press,
1976, pp 181-182, n.904-920
* ^ Rawlinson (1859) , p. 6
* ^ Murray (1986) , pp. 190–191
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Burn (1972) , p. 10
* ^ David Pipes. "Herodotus: Father of History, Father of Lies".
Retrieved 16 November 2009. Check date values in: access-date= (help
* ^ Rawlinson (1859)
* ^ Burn (1972) , p. 13
* ^ Lawrence A. Tritle. (2004). _The Peloponnesian War_. Greenwood
Publishing Group. pp 147-148
* ^ John Hart. (1982). _
Herodotus and Greek History_. Taylor and
Francis. p 174
* ^ _A_ _B_ Murray (1986) , p. 191
* ^ Waterfield, Robin (trans.) and Dewald, Carolyn (ed.). (1998).
_The Histories by Herodotus_. University of Oxford Press.
“Introduction”, p xviii
* ^ Richard C. Jebb, _The Genius of Sophocles_, section 7
* ^ Burn (1972) , p. 7
* ^ Rawlinson (1859) , p. 1
* ^ Rawlinson (1859) , Introduction
* ^ Burn (1972) , Introduction
* ^ Dandamaev, M. A. (1989). _A Political History of the Achaemenid
Empire_. BRILL. p. 153. ISBN 978-9004091726 . The ‘Father of
History’, Herodotus, was born at Halicarnassus, and before his
emigration to mainland Greece was a subject of the Persian empire.
* ^ Kia, Mehrdad (2016). _The Persian Empire: A Historical
Encyclopedia_. ABC-CLIO. p. 161. ISBN 978-1610693912 . At the time of
Herodotus’ birth southwestern Asia Minor, including Halicarnassus,
was under Persian Achaemenid rule.
* ^ Burn (1972) , p. 11
* ^ Rawlinson (1859) , p. 11
Eusebius _Chron. Can. Pars._ II p 339, 01.83.4, cited by
Rawlinson (1859) , Introduction
Plutarch _De Malign. Herod._ II p 862 A, cited by Rawlinson
(1859) , Introduction
* ^ _The Histories_. Introduction and Notes by John Marincola;
Trans. by Aubrey de Selincourt. Penguin Books. 2003. pp. xii.
* ^ Rawlinson (1859) , p. 14
* ^ Montfaucon’s _Bibliothec. Coisl. Cod._ clxxvii p 609, cited
by Rawlinson (1859) , p. 14
* ^ Photius _Bibliothec. Cod._ lx p 59, cited by Rawlinson (1859) ,
Tzetzes _Chil._ 1.19, cited by Rawlinson (1859) , p. 15
* ^ Marcellinus, _in Vita. Thucyd._ p ix, cited by Rawlinson (1859)
, p. 25
* ^ Rawlinson (1859) , p. 25
* ^ _A_ _B_ Murray (1986) , p. 189
* ^ Mikalson (2003) , pp. 198–200
* ^ Fehling (1994) , p. 2
* ^ _A_ _B_ Jones (1996)
* ^ _A_ _B_ Boedeker (2000) , pp. 101–102
* ^ Saltzman (2010)
* ^ Archambault (2002) , p. 171
* ^ Farley (2010) , p. 21
* ^ _A_ _B_ Lloyd (1993) , p. 4
* ^ _A_ _B_ Nielsen (1997) , pp. 42–43
* ^ _A_ _B_ Baragwanath & de Bakker (2010) , p. 19
* ^ _A_ _B_ Fehling (1994) , p. 13
* ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Marincola (2001) , p. 34
* ^ _A_ _B_ Dalley (2003)
* ^ _A_ _B_ Dalley (2013)
* ^ Fehling (1989) , pp. 4, 53–54
* ^ Roberts (2011) , p. 2
* ^ Marincola (2001) , p. 59
* ^ Cameron (2004) , p. 156
* ^ Sparks (1998) , p. 58
* ^ Asheri, Lloyd & Corcella (2007)
* ^ Welsby (1996) , p. 40
* ^ Heeren (1838) , pp. 13, 379, 422–424
* ^ Aubin (2002) , pp. 94–96, 100–102, 118–121, 141–144,
* ^ Diop (1981) , p. 1
* ^ Diop (1974) , p. 2
* ^ Fehling (1994) , pp. 4–6
* ^ The Indian Empire _
The Imperial Gazetteer of India _, 1909, v.
2, p. 272.
* ^ "Was the Ramayana actually set in and around today\'s
* ^ _A_ _B_ Peissel (1984)
* ^ Marlise Simons (25 November 1996). "Himalayas offer clue to
legend of gold-digging \'ants\'".
The New York Times . Retrieved 23
* ^ Rawlinson (1859) , pp. 13–14
* ^ "
Dio Chrysostom \'\'Orat. xxxvii, p11". Penelope.uchicago.edu.
Retrieved 13 September 2012.
* ^ Marcellinus, _Life of Thucydides_
* ^ Burn (1972) , pp. 8, 9, 32–34
* ^ Fehling (1989)
* ^ Waters (1985) , p. 3
* ^ Blanco (2013) , pp. 5–6, §1.1, 1.5
* ^ Blanco (2013) , p. 6, §1.5
* ^ Blanco (2013) , p. 9, §1.20
* ^ Blanco (2013) , p. 12, §1.29
* ^ Blanco (2013) , p. 17, §1.45, ¶2
* ^ Blanco (2013) , p. 5
* ^ Gould (1989) , p. 64
* ^ Homer, _Iliad_, trans. Stanley Lombardo (Indianapolis: Hackett
Publishing Company_,_ 1997): 1, Bk. 1, lines 9-16.
* ^ Gould (1989) , p. 65
* ^ Gould (1989) , p. 67
* ^ Gould (1989) , pp. 67–70
* ^ Gould (1989) , p. 71
* ^ Gould (1989) , pp. 72–73
* ^ Gould (1989) , pp. 75–76
* ^ Gould (1989) , pp. 76–78
* ^ Gould (1989) , pp. 77–78
* ^ Wardman (1960)
* ^ _Histories_ 1.23–24.
* ^ Romm (1998) , p. 8
* ^ Romm (1998) , p. 6
* Archambault, Paul (2002). "
Herodotus (c. 480–c. 420)". In Alba
della Fazia Amoia & Bettina Liebowitz Knapp. _Multicultural Writers
from Antiquity to 1945: a Bio-bibliographical Sourcebook_. Greenwood
Publishing Group. pp. 168–172. ISBN 9780313306877 . CS1 maint: Uses
editors parameter (link )
* Asheri, David; Lloyd, Alan; Corcella, Aldo (2007). _A Commentary
on Herodotus, Books 1-4_. Oxford University Press. ISBN
* Aubin, Henry (2002). _The Rescue of Jerusalem_. New York, NY: Soho
Press. ISBN 1-56947-275-0 .
* Baragwanath, Emily; de Bakker, Mathieu (2010). _Herodotus_. Oxford
Bibliographies Online Research Guide. Oxford University Press. ISBN
* Blanco, Walter (2013). _The Histories_. Herodotus. New York, NY:
W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-93397-0 .
* Boedeker, Deborah (2000). "Herodotus' genre(s)". In Mary Depew &
Dirk Obbink. _Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society_.
Harvard University Press. pp. 97–114. ISBN 9780674034204 . CS1
maint: Uses editors parameter (link )
* Burn, A. R. (1972). _Herodotus: The Histories_.
Penguin Classics .
* Cameron, Alan (2004). _Greek Mythography in the Roman World_.
Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-803821-4 .
* Dalley, S. (2003). "Why did
Herodotus not mention the Hanging
Gardens of Babylon?". In P. Derow & R. Parker. _
Herodotus and his
World_. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 171–189. ISBN
0-19-925374-9 . CS1 maint: Uses editors parameter (link )
* Dalley, S. (2013). _The Mystery of the Hanging Garden of Babylon:
an Elusive World Wonder Traced_. Oxford University Press. ISBN
* Diop, Cheikh Anta (1974). _The African Origin of Civilization_.
Chicago, IL: Lawrence Hill Books. ISBN 1-55652-072-7 .
* Diop, Cheikh Anta (1981). _Civilization or Barbarism_. Chicago,
IL: Lawrence Hill Books. ISBN 1-55652-048-4 .
* Farley, David G. (2010). _Modernist Travel Writing: Intellectuals
Abroad_. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press. ISBN
* Fehling, Detlev (1989) . _Herodotos and His 'Sources': Citation,
Invention, and Narrative Art_. Arca Classical and Medieval Texts,
Papers and Monographs. 21. Translated from the German by J. G. Howie.
Leeds: Francis Cairns. ISBN 978-0-90520-570-0 .
* Fehling, Detlev (1994). "The art of
Herodotus and the margins of
the world". In Z. R. W. M. von Martels. _Travel Fact and Travel
Fiction: Studies on Fiction, Literary Tradition, Scholarly Discovery,
and Observation in Travel Writing_. Brill's studies in intellectual
history. 55. Leiden: Brill. pp. 1–15. ISBN 9789004101128 .
* Gould, John (1989). _Herodotus_. Historians on historians. London:
George Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 978-0-297-79339-7 .
* Heeren, A. H. L. (1838). _Historical Researches into the Politics,
Intercourse, and Trade of the Carthaginians, Ethiopians, and
Egyptians_. Oxford: D. A. Talboys. ASIN B003B3P1Y8 .
* Immerwahr, Henry R. (1985). "Herodotus". In P. E. Easterling & B.
M. W. Knox. _Greek Literature_. The Cambridge History of Classical
Greek Literature. 1. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-21042-9 .
CS1 maint: Uses editors parameter (link )
* Jones, C. P. (1996). "ἔθνος and γένος in Herodotus".
The Classical Quarterly _. new series. 46 (2): 315–320. doi
* Lloyd, Alan B. (1993). _Herodotus, Book II_. Études
préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l'Empire romain. 43.
Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-07737-9 .
* Marincola, John (2001). _Greek Historians_. Oxford University
Press. ISBN 978-0-19-922501-9 .
* Mikalson, Jon D. (2003). _
Herodotus and Religion in the Persian
Wars_. Chapel Hill, NC: Univ of North Carolina Press. ISBN
* Murray, Oswyn (1986). "Greek historians". In John Boardman, Jasper
Griffin & Oswyn Murray. _The Oxford History of the Classical World_.
Oxford University Press. pp. 186–203. ISBN 978-0-19-872112-3 . CS1
maint: Uses editors parameter (link )
* Nielsen, Flemming A. J. (1997). _The Tragedy in History: Herodotus
and the Deuteronomistic History_. A&C Black. ISBN 978-1-85075-688-0 .
* Peissel, Michel (1984). _The Ants' Gold: The Discovery of the
Greek El Dorado in the Himalayas_. Collins. ISBN 978-0-00-272514-9 .
* Rawlinson, George (1859). _The History of Herodotus_. 1. New York:
D. Appleton and Company.
* Roberts, Jennifer T. (2011). _Herodotus: a Very Short
Introduction_. OXford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-957599-2 .
* Romm, James (1998). _Herodotus_. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press. ISBN 0-300-07229-5 .
* Saltzman, Joe (2010). "
Herodotus as an ancient journalist:
reimagining antiquity\'s historians as journalists". _The IJPC Journal
_. 2: 153–185.
* Sparks, Kenton L. (1998). _Ethnicity and Identity in Ancient
Israel: Prolegomena to the Study of Ethnic Sentiments and their
Expression in the Hebrew Bible_. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns. ISBN
* Wardman, A. E. (1960). "Myth in Greek historiography". _Historia:
Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte _. 9 (4): 403–413.
JSTOR 4434671 .
* Waters, K. H. (1985). _Herodotos the Historian: His Problems,
Methods and Originality_. University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN
* Welsby, Derek (1996). _The Kingdom of Kush_. London: British
Museum Press. ISBN 0-7141-0986-X .
* Bakker, Egbert J. ; de Jong, Irene J.F.; van Wees, Hans, eds.
(2002). _Brill's companion to Herodotus_. Leiden: E.J. Brill. ISBN
* Baragwanath, Emily (2010). _Motivation and Narrative in
Herodotus_. Oxford Classical Monographs. Oxford University Press. ISBN
* De Selincourt, Aubrey (1962). _The World of Herodotus_. London:
Secker and Warburg.
* Dewald, Carolyn; Marincola, John, eds. (2006). _The Cambridge
companion to Herodotus_. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN
* Evans, J.A.S. (2006). _The beginnings of history:
the Persian Wars_. Campbellville, Ont.: Edgar Kent. ISBN 0-88866-652-7
* Evans, J.A.S. (1982). _Herodotus_. Boston: Twayne. ISBN
* Evans, J.A.S. (1991). _Herodotus, explorer of the past: three
essays_. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-06871-2
* Flory, Stewart (1987). _The archaic smile of Herodotus_. Detroit:
Wayne State University Press. ISBN 0-8143-1827-4 .
* Fornara, Charles W. (1971). _Herodotus: An Interpretative Essay_.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
* Giessen, Hans W. Giessen (2010). _Mythos Marathon. Von Herodot
über Bréal bis zur Gegenwart_. Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik
(= Landauer Schriften zur Kommunikations- und Kulturwissenschaft. Band
17). ISBN 978-3-941320-46-8 .
* Gould, John (1989). _Herodotus_. New York: St. Martin's Press.
ISBN 0-312-02855-5 .
* Harrington, John W. (1973). _To see a world_. Saint Louis: G.V.
Mosby Co. ISBN 0-8016-2058-9 .
* Hartog, François (2000). "The Invention of History: The
Pre-History of a Concept from
Homer to Herodotus". _History and
Theory_. 39 (3): 384–395. doi :10.1111/0018-2656.00137 .
* Hartog, François (1988). _The mirror of Herodotus: the
representation of the other in the writing of history_. Janet Lloyd,
trans. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-05487-3 .
* How, Walter W.; Wells, Joseph, eds. (1912). _A Commentary on
Herodotus_. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
* Hunter, Virginia (1982). _Past and process in
Thucydides_. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN
* Immerwahr, H. (1966). _Form and Thought in Herodotus_. Cleveland:
Case Western Reserve University Press.
* Kapuściński, Ryszard (2007). _Travels with Herodotus_. Klara
Glowczewska, trans. New York: Knopf. ISBN 978-1-4000-4338-5 .
* Lateiner, Donald (1989). _The historical method of Herodotus_.
Toronto: Toronto University Press. ISBN 0-8020-5793-4 .
* Pitcher, Luke (2009). _Writing Ancient History: An Introduction to
Classical Historiography_. New York: I.B. Taurus & Co Ltd.
* Marozzi, Justin (2008). _The way of Herodotus: travels with the
man who invented history_. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press. ISBN
* Momigliano, Arnaldo (1990). _The classical foundations of modern
historiography_. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. ISBN
* Myres, John L. (1971). _
Herodotus : father of history_. Chicago:
Henry Regnrey. ISBN 0-19-924021-3 .
* Pritchett, W. Kendrick (1993). _The liar school of Herodotus_.
Amsterdam: Gieben. ISBN 90-5063-088-X .
* Selden, Daniel (1999). "Cambyses' Madness, or the Reason of
History". _Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici_.
* Thomas, Rosalind (2000). _
Herodotus in context: ethnography,
science and the art of persuasion_. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. ISBN 0-521-66259-1 .
* Waters, K.H. (1985). _
Herodotus the Historian: His Problems,
Methods and Originality_. Beckenham: Croom Helm Ltd.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to HERODOTUS _.
Wikiquote has quotations related to: HERODOTUS _
Wikisource has original works written by or about:
Wikisource has original