Heaviside–Lorentz units

Heaviside–Lorentz units (or Lorentz–Heaviside units) constitute a system of units (particularly electromagnetic units) within CGS, named for Hendrik Antoon Lorentz and Oliver Heaviside. They share with CGS-Gaussian units the property that the electric constant and magnetic constant do not appear, having been incorporated implicitly into the electromagnetic quantities by the way they are defined. Heaviside–Lorentz units may be regarded as normalizing and , while at the same time revising Maxwell's equations to use the speed of light instead.

Heaviside–Lorentz units, like SI units but unlike Gaussian units, are ''rationalized'', meaning that there are no factors of appearing explicitly in Maxwell's equations.Kowalski, Ludwik, 1986,
A Short History of the SI Units in Electricity
" ''The Physics Teacher'' 24(2): 97–99
Alternate web link (subscription required)
/ref> That these units are rationalized partly explains their appeal in quantum field theory: the Lagrangian underlying the theory does not have any factors of in these units. Consequently, Heaviside–Lorentz units differ by factors of in the definitions of the electric and magnetic fields and of electric charge. They are often used in relativistic calculations, As used by Einstein, such as in his book: and are used in particle physics. They are particularly convenient when performing calculations in spatial dimensions greater than three such as in string theory.

Motivation

In the mid-late 19th Century, electromagnetic measurements were frequently made in either the so-called electrostatic (ESU) or electromagnetic (EMU) systems of units. These were based respectively on Coulomb's and Ampere's Law. Use of these systems, as with to the subsequently developed Gaussian CGS units, resulted in many factors of appearing in formulas for electromagnetic results, even in examples without circular or spherical symmetry. For example, in Gaussian CGS units, the capacitance of sphere of radius is while that of a parallel plate capacitor is , where is the area of the plates and is their separation.

Heaviside, who was an important, though somewhat isolated, early theorist of electromagnetism, suggested in 1882 that the ''irrational'' appearance of in these sorts of relations could be removed by redefining the unit of the charges and fields.

In 1893 Heaviside wrote (See also https://wiki.opensourceecology.de/Heaviside_1893)

Length–mass–time framework

As in the Gaussian units (), the Heaviside–Lorentz () units use the ''length–mass–time'' dimensions. This means that all of the electric and magnetic units are expressible in terms of the base units of length, time and mass.

Coulomb's equation, used to define charge in these systems, is / in the Gaussian system, and in the system. The unit of charge then connects to , where is the unit of charge. The quantity describing a charge is then larger than the corresponding Gaussian quantity. There are comparable relationships for the other electromagnetic quantities (see below).

The commonly used set of units is the called the system, and it defines two constants, called the vacuum permittivity () and the vacuum permeability (). These can be used to convert units to their corresponding Heaviside–Lorentz values, as detailed below. For example, charge is When one puts , , , and , this evaluates to , which size of the Heaviside–Lorentz unit of charge.

Comparison of Heaviside–Lorentz with other systems of units

This section has a list of the basic formulas of electromagnetism, given in SI, Heaviside–Lorentz, and Gaussian units.
Here $\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$ are the electric field and displacement field, respectively,
$\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$ are the magnetic fields,
$\mathbf$ is the polarization density,
$\mathbf$ is the magnetization,
$\mathbf$ is charge density,
$\mathbf$ is current density,
$c$ is the speed of light in vacuum,
$\phi$ is the electric potential,
$\mathbf$ is the magnetic vector potential,
$\mathbf$ is the Lorentz force acting on a body of charge $q$ and velocity $v$,
$\epsilon$ is the permittivity,
$\chi_\text$ is the electric susceptibility.
$\mu$ is the magnetic permeability,
and
$\chi_\text$ is the magnetic susceptibility.

Maxwell's equations

The electric and magnetic fields can be written in terms of the potentials $\mathbf$ and $\phi$.
The definition of the magnetic field in terms of $\mathbf$,
$\mathbf = \nabla \times \mathbf$, is the same in all systems of units, but the electric field is
$\mathbf = -\nabla\phi-\frac$ in the system,
but $\mathbf = -\nabla\phi-\frac \frac$ in the or systems.

Other basic laws

Dielectric and magnetic materials

Below are the expressions for the macroscopic fields $\mathbf$, $\mathbf$, $\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$ in a material medium. It is assumed here for simplicity that the medium is homogeneous, linear, isotropic, and nondispersive, so that the susceptibilities are constants.

Note that The quantities $\epsilon^\textsf/\epsilon_0$, $\epsilon^\textsf$ and $\epsilon^\textsf$ are dimensionless, and they have the same numeric value. By contrast, the electric susceptibility $\chi_\text$ is dimensionless in all the systems, but has ''different numeric values'' for the same material:
$\chi_\text^\textsf = \chi_\text^\textsf = 4\pi \chi_\text^\textsf$
The same statements apply for the corresponding magnetic quantities.

Advantages and disadvantages of Heaviside–Lorentz units

Advantages

* The formulas above are clearly simpler in units compared to either or units. As Heaviside proposed, removing the from the Gauss law and putting it in the Force law considerably reduces the number of places the appears compared to Gaussian CGS units.
* Removing the explicit from the Gauss law makes it clear that the inverse-square force law arises by the $\mathbf$ field spreading out over the surface of a sphere. This allows a straightforward extension to other dimensions. For example the case of long, parallel wires extending straight in the direction can be considered a two-dimensional system. Another example is in string theory, where more than three spatial dimensions often need to be considered.
* The equations are free of the constants and that are present in the system. (In addition and are overdetermined, because = .)

The below points are true in both and systems, but not .

* The electric and magnetic fields $\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$ have the same dimensions in the system, meaning it is easy to recall where factors of go in the Maxwell equation. Every time derivative comes with a , which makes it dimensionally the same as a space derivative. In contrast, in units mathbf/ mathbf/math> is .
* Giving the $\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$ fields the same dimension makes the assembly into the electromagnetic tensor more transparent. There are no factors of that need to be inserted when assembling the tensor out of the three-dimensional fields. Similarly, $\phi$ and $\mathbf$ have the same dimensions and are the four components of the 4-potential.
* The fields $\mathbf$, $\mathbf$, $\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$ also have the same dimensions as $\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$. In a vacuum, any expression involving $\mathbf$ can simply be recast as the same expression with $\mathbf$. In units, $\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$ have the same units, as do $\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$, but they have different units from each other and from $\mathbf$ and $\mathbf$.

Disadvantages

* Despite Heaviside's urgings, it proved difficult to persuade people to switch from the established units. He believed that if the units were changed, " d style instruments would very soon be in a minority, and then disappear ...". Persuading people to switch was already difficult in 1893, and in the meanwhile there have been more than a century's worth of additional textbooks printed and voltmeters built.

* Heaviside–Lorentz units, like the Gaussian CGS units by which they generally differ by a factor of about , are frequently of rather inconvenient sizes. The ampere (coulomb/sec) is reasonable unit for measuring currents commonly encountered, but the ESU/s, as demonstrated above, is far too small. The Gaussian CGS unit of electric potential is named a statvolt. It is about 300 V, a value which is larger than most commonly encountered potentials. The henry, the unit for inductance is already on the large side compared to most inductors, the unit is 12 orders of magnitude larger.

* A few of the Gaussian CGS units have names; none of the Heaviside–Lorentz units do.

Textbooks in theoretical physics use Heaviside–Lorentz units nearly exclusively, frequently in their natural form (see below), because the system's conceptual simplicity and compactness significantly clarify the discussions, and it is possible if necessary to convert the resulting answers to appropriate units after the fact by inserting appropriate factors of $c$ and $\epsilon_0$. Some textbooks on classical electricity and magnetism have been written using Gaussian CGS units, but recently some of them have been rewritten to use units. Outside of these contexts, including for example magazine articles on electric circuits, and units are rarely encountered.

Translating expressions and formulas between systems

To convert any expression or formula between SI, Heaviside–Lorentz or Gaussian systems, the corresponding quantities shown in the table below can be directly equated and hence substituted. This will reproduce any of the specific formulas given in the list above.

As an example, starting with the equation
:$\nabla \cdot \mathbf^\textsf = \rho^\textsf/\epsilon_0 ,$
and the equations from the table
:$\sqrt \ \mathbf^\textsf = \mathbf^\textsf$
:$\frac \rho^\textsf = \rho^\textsf ,$
moving the factor across in the latter identities and substituting, the result is
:$\nabla \cdot \left(\frac \mathbf^\textsf\right) = \left(\sqrt \rho^\textsf\right)/\epsilon_0 ,$
which then simplifies to
:$\nabla \cdot \mathbf^\textsf = \rho^\textsf .$

Notes

References

{{DEFAULTSORT:Heaviside-Lorentz units
Special relativity
Electromagnetism
Hendrik Lorentz