parouse.com
 Parouse.com



Halakha (/hɑːˈlɔːxə/;[1] Hebrew: הֲלָכָה‬, Sephardic: [halaˈχa]; also transliterated as halacha, halakhah, halachah or halocho) (Ashkenazic: [haˈloχo]) is the collective body of Jewish religious laws derived from the Written and Oral Torah. It is based on biblical laws or "commandments" (mitzvot) (traditionally numbered as 613), subsequent Talmudic and rabbinic law and the customs and traditions compiled in the many books, one of the most famous of which is the 16th-century Shulchan Aruch
Shulchan Aruch
(literally "Prepared Table"). Halakha is often translated as " Jewish
Jewish
Law", although a more literal translation might be "the way to behave" or "the way of walking". The word derives from the root that means "to behave" (also "to go" or "to walk"). Halakha guides not only religious practices and beliefs, but also numerous aspects of day-to-day life. Historically, in the Jewish
Jewish
diaspora, halakha served many Jewish communities as an enforceable avenue of law – both civil and religious, since no differentiation exists in classical Judaism. Since the Jewish
Jewish
Enlightenment (Haskalah) and Jewish emancipation
Jewish emancipation
many have come to view the halakha as less binding in day-to-day life, as it relies on rabbinic interpretation, as opposed to the pure, written words recorded in the Hebrew
Hebrew
Bible. Under contemporary Israeli law, certain areas of Israeli family and personal status law are under the authority of the rabbinic courts, so are treated according to halakha. Some differences in halakha itself are found among Ashkenazi, Mizrahi, Sephardi, Yemenite, and other Jews who historically lived in isolated communities, such as in Ethiopia, reflecting the historic and geographic diversity of various Jewish communities within the Diaspora.

Contents

1 Etymology and terminology 2 The 613 mitzvot

2.1 Categories 2.2 Sin 2.3 Gentiles and Jewish
Jewish
law

3 Sources and process

3.1 Historical analysis

4 Views today

4.1 Flexibility 4.2 Differences between Orthodox and Conservative Judaism

4.2.1 Orthodox Judaism 4.2.2 Conservative Judaism

5 Codes of Jewish
Jewish
law 6 See also 7 References 8 Bibliography 9 External links

9.1 Full-text resources of major halakhic works

Etymology and terminology[edit] The word halakha is derived from the Hebrew
Hebrew
root halakh – "to walk" or "to go".[2] Taken literally, therefore, halakha translates as "the way to walk" rather than "law". The word halakha refers to the corpus of rabbinic legal texts, or to the overall system of religious law. The term may also be related to Akkadian
Akkadian
ilku, a property tax, rendered in Aramaic as halakh, designating one or several obligations.[3] Halakha is often contrasted with aggadah ("the telling"), the diverse corpus of rabbinic exegetical, narrative, philosophical, mystical, and other "non-legal" texts.[3] At the same time, since writers of halakha may draw upon the aggadic and even mystical literature, a dynamic interchange occurs between the genres. Halakha also does not include the parts of the Torah
Torah
not related to commandments. Halakha constitutes the practical application of the 613 mitzvot ("commandments") in the Torah, as developed through discussion and debate in the classical rabbinic literature, especially the Mishnah and the Talmud
Talmud
(the "Oral Torah") and as codified in the Mishneh Torah ("Repetition of the Torah") or Shulchan Aruch
Shulchan Aruch
("Code of Law"). Because halakha is developed and applied by various halakhic authorities rather than one sole "official voice", different individuals and communities may well have different answers to halakhic questions. With few exceptions, controversies are not settled through authoritative structures because during the Jewish
Jewish
diaspora, Jews
Jews
lacked a single judicial hierarchy or appellate review process for halakha. Halakha has been developed throughout the generations since before 500 BCE, in a constantly expanding collection of rabbinic literature initially consolidated in the Talmud. First and foremost, it forms a body of intricate judicial (rabbinical) opinions, legislation, customs, and recommendations, many of them passed down over the centuries, and an assortment of ingrained behaviors, relayed to successive generations from the moment a child begins to speak. It is also the subject of intense study in yeshivas. The 613 mitzvot[edit] See also: Mitzvah § Mitzvot and Jewish
Jewish
law Broadly, the halakha comprises the practical application of the 613 mitzvot in the Torah, as developed in subsequent rabbinic literature. According to the Talmud
Talmud
(Tractate Makot), 613 mitzvot
613 mitzvot
are in the Torah, 248 positive ("thou shall") mitzvot and 365 negative ("thou shall not") mitzvot, supplemented by seven mitzvot legislated by the rabbis of antiquity. Categories[edit] Main articles: Oral Torah
Torah
and Law
Law
given to Moses
Moses
at Sinai See also: Mitzvah § Rabbinical mitzvot Classical Rabbinic Judaism
Judaism
has two basic categories of laws:[citation needed]

Laws which are believed to have been revealed by God
God
to the Israelites at Mount Sinai e.g. the Written Torah, also called the Law
Law
of Moses, and also elucidations therefrom, known as the Oral Torah Laws of human origin including rabbinic decrees, interpretations, customs, etc.

This division between revealed and rabbinic commandments may influence the importance of a rule, its enforcement and the nature of its ongoing interpretation. Halakhic authorities may disagree on which laws fall into which categories or the circumstances (if any) under which prior rabbinic rulings can be re-examined by contemporary rabbis, but all Halakhic Jews
Jews
hold that both categories exist and that the first category is immutable, with exceptions only for life-saving and similar emergency circumstances. A second classical distinction is between the Written Law, laws written in the Hebrew
Hebrew
Bible, and the Oral Law, laws which are believed to have been transmitted orally prior to their later compilation in texts such as the Mishnah, Talmud, and rabbinic codes. Commandments are divided into positive and negative commands, which are treated differently in terms of divine and human punishment. Positive commandments require an action to be performed and are considered to bring the performer closer to God. Negative commandments (traditionally 365 in number) forbid a specific action, and violations create a distance from God. A further division is made between chukim ("decrees" – laws without obvious explanation, such as shatnez, the law prohibiting wearing clothing made of mixtures of linen and wool), mishpatim ("judgments" – laws with obvious social implications) and eduyot ("testimonies" or "commemorations", such as the Shabbat
Shabbat
and holidays). Through the ages, various rabbinical authorities have classified some of the 613 commandments in various other ways. A different approach divides the laws into a different set of categories:[citation needed]

Laws in relation to God
God
(bein adam laMakom, literally "between a person and the Place"), and Laws about relations with other people (bein adam le-chavero, literally "between a person and his friend").

Within Talmudic literature, Jewish
Jewish
law is divided into the six orders of the Mishnah, which are categories by proximate subject matter: Zeraim ("Seeds") for agricultural laws and prayer, Moed ("Festival"), for the Sabbath and the Festivals, Nashim ("Women"), dealing primarily with marriage and divorce, Nezikin ("Damages"), for civil and criminal law, Kodashim ("Holy things"), for sacrifices and the dietary laws, and Tohorot ("Purities") for ritual purity. However, Talmudic texts often deal with laws outside these apparent subject categories. As a result, Jewish
Jewish
law came to be categorized in other ways in the post-Talmudic period. In the major codes of Jewish
Jewish
law, two other main categorization schemes are found. Maimonides' Mishneh Torah
Torah
divides the laws into 14 sections. The codification efforts that culminated in the Shulchan Aruch divide the law into four sections, including only laws that do not depend on being physically present in the Land of Israel. Sin[edit] Judaism
Judaism
regards the violation of the commandments, the mitzvot, to be a sin. The generic Hebrew
Hebrew
word for any kind of sin is aveira ("transgression"). Based on the Tanakh
Tanakh
( Hebrew
Hebrew
Bible) Judaism describes three levels of sin:[citation needed]

Pesha – an "intentional sin"; an action committed in deliberate defiance of God's commandments Avon – a "sin of lust or uncontrollable emotion, committed against one's will, and is not in line with one's true inner desires". It is a sin done knowingly, but not done to defy God Chet – an "unintentional sin"

Relatedly, the three terms – chayyav, patur, mutar – in the Gemara (literally: "the finished [word]") and Halakhic codes classify the permissibility of an action or the severity of its prohibition and punishment.[citation needed]

Chayyav (חייב), (literally "obligated" or "must") means the ones who transgress the prohibition are responsible for their own criminal actions, so ought to pay the price for them. Patur (פטור) means "exempt" of liability to punishment, but the action is forbidden. Mutar (מותר) means the action is permitted.

Judaism
Judaism
understands that the vast majority of people, aside from those who are termed Tzadikim
Tzadikim
and those termed Tzadikim
Tzadikim
gemurim (Hebrew: צדיק, "the righteous" and "the completely righteous"), will succumb to sin in their lives. A sin or a state of sin does not condemn a person to damnation; a road of teshuva (Hebrew: תשובה; repentance, literally: "return") is always present. For some classes of people, this is exceedingly difficult, such as those who commit adultery, as well as those who slander others. In earlier days, when ancient Jews
Jews
had a functioning court system (the beth din and the Sanhedrin
Sanhedrin
high court), courts were empowered to administer physical punishments for various violations, upon conviction by extremely high standards of evidence, far stricter than those required in western courts today. These punishments included execution, corporal punishment, incarceration, and excommunication. However, since the fall of the Second Temple, executions have been forbidden. Since the fall of the autonomous Jewish
Jewish
communities of Europe, most other punishments also have been discontinued. Today, then, one's accounts are reckoned solely by God. The Talmud says that although courts capable of executing sinners no longer exist, the prescribed penalties continue to be applied by Providence. For instance, someone who has committed a sin punishable by stoning might fall off a roof, or someone who ought to be executed by strangulation might drown.[4] Gentiles and Jewish
Jewish
law[edit] The Seven Laws of Noah, also referred to as the Noahide Laws or the Noachide Laws, are a set of imperatives which, according to the Talmud, were given by God
God
as a binding set of laws for the "children of Noah" – that is, all of humanity. Sources and process[edit]

Eras of Jewish
Jewish
law

The Tannaim (literally the "repeaters") are the sages of the Mishnah (0–200) The Amoraim
Amoraim
(literally the "sayers") are the sages of the Gemara (200–500) The Savoraim (literally the "reasoners") are the classical Persian rabbis (500–650) The Geonim (literally the "prides" or "geniuses") are the rabbis of Sura and Pumbeditha, in Babylonia (650–1038) The Rishonim (literally the "firsts") are the rabbis of the late medieval period (c. 1038–1563) preceding the Shulchan Aruch The Acharonim (literally the "lasts") are the rabbis from roughly 1500 to the present.

See also: Rabbinic literature The development of halakhah in the period before the Maccabees, which has been described as the formative period in the history of its development, is shrouded in obscurity. Y. Baer (in Zion, 17 (1951–52), 1–55) has argued that there was little pure academic legal activity at this period and that many of the laws originating at this time were produced by a means of neighbourly good conduct rules in a similar way as carried out by Greeks in the age of Solon. For example, the first chapter of Bava Kamma, contains a formulation of the law of torts worded in the first person.[5] The boundaries of Jewish
Jewish
law are determined through the Halakhic process, a religious-ethical system of legal reasoning. Rabbis generally base their opinions on the primary sources of halakha as well as on precedent set by previous rabbinic opinions. The major sources and genre of halakha consulted include:

The foundational Talmudic literature (especially the Mishna
Mishna
and the Babylonian Talmud) with commentaries;

Talmudic hermeneutics: the science which defines the rules and methods for the investigation and exact determination of the meaning of the Scriptures; includes also the rules by which the Halakhot are derived from and established by the written law. These may be seen as the rules by which early Jewish
Jewish
law was derived. Gemara
Gemara
– the Talmudic process of elucidating the halakha

The post-Talmudic codificatory literature, such as Maimonides's Mishneh Torah
Torah
and the Shulchan Aruch
Shulchan Aruch
with its commentaries; Regulations and other "legislative" enactments promulgated by rabbis and communal bodies:

Gezeirah (literally "declaration"): "preventative legislation" of the rabbis, intended to prevent violations of the commandments Takkanah (literally "Repair", meaning also "Regulation"): "positive legislation", practices instituted by the rabbis not based (directly) on the commandments

Minhag: Customs, community practices, and customary law, as well as the exemplary deeds of prominent (or local) rabbis; The she'eloth u-teshuvoth (responsa, literally "questions and answers") literature. Dina d'malchuta dina (literally "the law of the king is law"): an additional aspect of halakha, being the principle recognizing non- Jewish
Jewish
laws and non- Jewish
Jewish
legal jurisdiction as binding on Jewish citizens, provided that they are not contrary to a law in Judaism. This principle applies primarily in areas of commercial, civil and criminal law.

In antiquity, the Sanhedrin
Sanhedrin
functioned essentially as the Supreme Court
Court
and legislature (in the US judicial system) for Judaism, and had the power to administer binding law, including both received law and its own rabbinic decrees, on all Jews—rulings of the Sanhedrin became halakha; see Oral law. That court ceased to function in its full mode in 40 CE. Today, the authoritative application of Jewish
Jewish
law is left to the local rabbi, and the local rabbinical courts, with only local applicability. In branches of Judaism
Judaism
that follow halakha, lay individuals make numerous ad-hoc decisions, but are regarded as not having authority to decide certain issues definitively. Since the days of the Sanhedrin, however, no body or authority has been generally regarded as having the authority to create universally recognized precedents. As a result, halakha has developed in a somewhat different fashion from Anglo-American legal systems with a Supreme Court
Court
able to provide universally accepted precedents. Generally, Halakhic arguments are effectively, yet unofficially, peer-reviewed. When a rabbinic posek (literally "he who makes a statement", "decisor") proposes an additional interpretation of a law, that interpretation may be considered binding for the posek's questioner or immediate community. Depending on the stature of the posek and the quality of the decision, an interpretation may also be gradually accepted by other rabbis and members of other Jewish communities. Under this system there is a tension between the relevance of earlier and later authorities in constraining Halakhic interpretation and innovation. On the one hand, there is a principle in halakha not to overrule a specific law from an earlier era, after it is accepted by the community as a law or vow,[6] unless supported by another, relevant earlier precedent; see list below. On the other hand, another principle recognizes the responsibility and authority of later authorities, and especially the posek handling a then-current question. In addition, the halakha embodies a wide range of principles that permit judicial discretion and deviation (Ben-Menahem). Notwithstanding the potential for innovation, rabbis and Jewish communities differ greatly on how they make changes in halakha. Notably, poskim frequently extend the application of a law to new situations, but do not consider such applications as constituting a "change" in halakha. For example, many Orthodox rulings concerning electricity are derived from rulings concerning fire, as closing an electrical circuit may cause a spark. In contrast, Conservative poskim consider that switching on electrical equipment is physically and chemically more like turning on a water tap (which is permissible by halakha) than lighting a fire (which is not permissible), and therefore permitted on Shabbat. The reformative Judaism
Judaism
in some cases explicitly interprets halakha to take into account its view of contemporary society. For instance, most Conservative rabbis extend the application of certain Jewish
Jewish
obligations and permissible activities to women (see How halakha is viewed today below). Within certain Jewish
Jewish
communities, formal organized bodies do exist. Within Modern Orthodox Judaism, there is no one committee or leader, but Modern US-based Orthodox rabbis generally agree with the views set by consensus by the leaders of the Rabbinical Council of America. Within Conservative Judaism, the Rabbinical Assembly has an official Committee on Jewish
Jewish
Law
Law
and Standards. Note that Takkanot, the plural form of Takkanah above, in general do not affect or restrict observance of Torah
Torah
mitzvot. (In common parlance sometimes people use the general term takkanah to refer either gezeirot or takkanot.) However, the Talmud
Talmud
states that in exceptional cases, the Sages had the authority to "uproot matters from the Torah". In Talmudic and classical Halakhic literature, this authority refers to the authority to prohibit some things that would otherwise be Biblically sanctioned (shev v'al ta'aseh, literally thou shall stay seated and not do). Rabbis may rule that a specific mitzvah from the Torah
Torah
should not be performed, e.g. blowing the shofar on Shabbat, or taking the lulav and etrog on Shabbat. These examples of takkanot which may be executed out of caution lest some might otherwise carry the mentioned items between home and the synagogue, thus inadvertently violating a Sabbath melakha. Another rare and limited form of takkanah involved overriding Torah
Torah
prohibitions. In some cases, the Sages allowed the temporary violation of a prohibition in order to maintain the Jewish
Jewish
system as a whole. This was part of the basis for Esther's relationship with Ahasuerus
Ahasuerus
(Xeres). For general usage of takkanaot in Jewish
Jewish
history see the article Takkanah. For examples of this being used in Conservative Judaism
Judaism
see Conservative halakha. Historical analysis[edit]

Rabbinical eras

Chazal

Zugot Tannaim Amoraim Savoraim

Geonim Rishonim Acharonim

v t e

The antiquity of the rules can be determined only by the dates of the authorities who quote them; in general, they cannot safely be declared older than the tanna (from Aramaic, literally "repeater") to whom they are first ascribed. It is certain, however, that the seven middot (literally "measurements", and referring to [good] behavior) of Hillel and the thirteen of Ishmael are earlier than the time of Hillel himself, who was the first to transmit them. The Talmud
Talmud
gives no information concerning the origin of the middot, although the Geonim ("Sages") regarded them as Sinaitic (given by God to the people of Israel
Israel
at the time of the Sinai presence). Modern historians believe that it is decidedly erroneous to consider the middot as traditional from the time of Moses
Moses
on Sinai. The middot seem to have been first laid down as abstract rules by the teachers of Hillel, though they were not immediately recognized by all as valid and binding. Different schools interpreted and modified them, restricted or expanded them, in various ways. Akiba and Ishmael and their scholars especially contributed to the development or establishment of these rules. Akiba devoted his attention particularly to the grammatical and exegetical rules, while Ishmael developed the logical. The rules laid down by one school were frequently rejected by another because the principles that guided them in their respective formulations were essentially different. According to Akiba, the divine language of the Torah
Torah
is distinguished from the speech of men by the fact that in the former no word or sound is superfluous. Some scholars have observed a similarity between these rabbinic rules of interpretation and the hermeneutics of ancient Hellenistic culture. For example, Saul Lieberman argues that the *names* (e.g. kal vahomer, literally a combination of the archaic form of the word for "straw" and the word for "clay" – "straw and clay", referring to the obvious [means of making a mud brick]) of rabbi Ishmael's middot are Hebrew translations of Greek terms, although the methods of those middot are not Greek in origin.[7] Views today[edit] See also: Talmud
Talmud
§ Present day Orthodox Judaism
Judaism
holds that halakha is the divine law as laid out in the Torah
Torah
(five books of Moses), rabbinical laws, rabbinical decrees and customs combined. The rabbis, who made many additions and interpretations of Jewish
Jewish
Law, did so only in accordance with regulations they believe were given for this purpose to Moses
Moses
on Mount Sinai, see Deuteronomy 17:11. See Orthodox Judaism, Beliefs about Jewish
Jewish
law and tradition.[8] Conservative Judaism
Judaism
holds that halakha is normative and binding, and is developed as a partnership between people and God
God
based on Sinaitic Torah. While there are a wide variety of Conservative views, a common belief is that halakha is, and has always been, an evolving process subject to interpretation by rabbis in every time period. See Conservative Judaism, Beliefs. Reform Judaism
Judaism
and Reconstructionist Judaism
Judaism
both hold that modern views of how the Torah
Torah
and rabbinic law developed imply that the body of rabbinic Jewish
Jewish
law is no longer normative (seen as binding) on Jews
Jews
today. Those in the traditionalist wing of these movements believe that the halakha represents a personal starting-point, holding that each Jew is obligated to interpret the Torah, Talmud
Talmud
and other Jewish
Jewish
works for themselves, and this interpretation will create separate commandments for each person. Those in the liberal and classical wings of Reform believe that in this day and era most Jewish
Jewish
religious rituals are no longer necessary, and many hold that following most Jewish
Jewish
laws is actually counterproductive. They propose that Judaism
Judaism
has entered a phase of ethical monotheism, and that the laws of Judaism
Judaism
are only remnants of an earlier stage of religious evolution, and need not be followed. This is considered wrong, and even heretical, by Orthodox and Conservative Judaism. Humanistic Jews
Jews
value the Torah
Torah
as a historical, political, and sociological text written by their ancestors. They do not believe "that every word of the Torah
Torah
is true, or even morally correct, just because the Torah
Torah
is old". The Torah
Torah
is both disagreed with and questioned. Humanistic Jews
Jews
believe that the entire Jewish
Jewish
experience, and not only the Torah, should be studied as a source for Jewish behavior and ethical values.[9] Flexibility[edit] Despite its internal rigidity, halakha has a degree of flexibility in finding solutions to modern problems that are not explicitly mentioned in the Torah. From the very beginnings of Rabbinic Judaism, halakhic inquiry allowed for a "sense of continuity between past and present, a self evident trust that their pattern of life and belief now conformed to the sacred patterns and beliefs presented by scripture and tradition."[10] According to an analysis by Jewish
Jewish
scholar Jeffrey Rubenstein of Michael Berger’s book Rabbinic Authority, the authority that rabbis hold “derives not from the institutional or personal authority of the sages but from a communal decision to recognize that authority, much as a community recognizes a certain judicial system to resolve its disputes and interpret its laws.”[11] Given this covenental relationship, rabbis are charged with connecting their contemporary community with the traditions and precedents of the past. When presented with contemporary issues, rabbis go through a halakhic process to find an answer. The classical approach has permitted new rulings regarding modern technology. For example, some of these rulings guide Jewish
Jewish
observers about the proper use of electricity on the Sabbath and holidays. Often, as to the applicability of the law in any given situation, the proviso is to "consult your local rabbi or posek". This notion lends rabbis a certain degree of local authority; however, for more complex questions the issue is passed onto higher rabbis who will then issue a teshuvot, which is a responsa that is binding.[12] Indeed, rabbis will continuously issue different opinions and will constantly review each other's work so as to maintain the truest sense of halakhah. Overall, this process allows rabbis to maintain connection of traditional Jewish
Jewish
law to modern life. Of course, the degree of flexibility depends on the sect of Judaism, with Reform being the most flexible, Conservative somewhat in the middle, and Orthodox being much more stringent and rigid. Modern critics, however, have charged that with the rise of movements that challenge the "divine" authority of halakha, traditional Jews
Jews
have greater reluctance to change, not only the laws themselves but also other customs and habits, than traditional Rabbinical Judaism
Judaism
did prior to the advent of Reform in the 19th century. Differences between Orthodox and Conservative Judaism[edit]

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Orthodox Jews
Jews
maintain halakha is derived from the divine law of the Torah
Torah
(Bible), rabbinical laws, rabbinical decrees and customs combined. As such it should be adhered to as an unalterable authority. They also believe there are traditional formulas that date back to Moses
Moses
on how the divine law may be interpreted – see above, "Rules by which early Jewish
Jewish
law was derived". Conservative Jews
Jews
have varied views regarding the origin of the Torah
Torah
and its authority today, and believe it can be continuously reinterpreted. Their view of halakha has given rise to substantial differences in approach as well as result. Orthodox Judaism[edit]

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Orthodox Jews
Jews
believe that halakha is a religious system whose core represents the revealed will of God. Although Orthodox Judaism acknowledges that rabbis have made many decisions and decrees regarding Jewish
Jewish
Law
Law
where the written Torah
Torah
itself is non-specific, they did so only in accordance with regulations given to them by Moses on Mount Sinai (see Deuteronomy 5:8–13). These regulations were transmitted orally until shortly after the destruction of the Second Temple. They were then recorded in the Mishnah, and explained in the Talmud
Talmud
and commentaries throughout history, including today. Orthodox Judaism
Judaism
believes that subsequent interpretations have been derived with the utmost accuracy and care. The most widely accepted codes of Jewish
Jewish
law are known as Mishneh Torah
Torah
and the Shulchan Aruch. No rabbi has the right to change Jewish
Jewish
law unless he clearly understands how it coincides with the precepts of the Talmud
Talmud
and later codes of Jewish law. Later commentaries were accepted by many rabbis as final; however, other rabbis may disagree.[citation needed] Orthodox Judaism
Judaism
has a range of opinions on the circumstances and extent to which change is permissible. Haredi Jews
Jews
generally hold that even minhagim (customs) must be retained and existing precedents cannot be reconsidered. Modern Orthodox authorities are generally more inclined to permit limited changes in customs, and some reconsideration of precedent. All Orthodox authorities, however, agree that only later rabbinical interpretations are subject to reconsideration, and hold that core sources of Divine written and oral law, such as the Torah
Torah
the Mishnah
Mishnah
and the Talmud, cannot be overridden.[citation needed] Conservative Judaism[edit]

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Further information: Conservative halakha One view held by Conservative Judaism
Judaism
is that while God
God
is real, the Torah
Torah
is not the word of God
God
in a literal sense. However, in this view the Torah
Torah
is still held as mankind's record of its understanding of God's revelation, and thus still has divine authority. In this view, traditional Jewish
Jewish
law is still seen as binding. Jews
Jews
who hold to this view generally try to use modern methods of historical study to learn how Jewish
Jewish
law has changed over time, and are in some cases more willing to change Jewish
Jewish
law in the present. A key practical difference between Conservative and Orthodox approaches is that Conservative Judaism
Judaism
holds that its rabbinical body's powers are not limited to reconsidering later precedents based on earlier sources, but the Committee on Jewish
Jewish
Law
Law
and Standards (CJLS) is empowered to override Biblical and Taanitic prohibitions by takkanah (decree) when perceived to be inconsistent with modern requirements or views of ethics. The CJLS has used this power on a number of occasions, most famously in the "driving teshuva", which says that if someone is unable to walk to any synagogue on the Sabbath, and their commitment to observance is so loose that not attending synagogue may lead them to drop it altogether, their rabbi may give them a dispensation to drive there and back; and more recently in its decision prohibiting the taking of evidence on Mamzer status on the grounds that implementing such a status is immoral. The CJLS has also held that the Talmudic concept of Kavod HaBriyot permits lifting rabbinic decrees (as distinct from carving narrow exceptions) on grounds of human dignity, and used this principle in a December 2006 opinion lifting all rabbinic prohibitions on homosexual conduct (the opinion held that only male-male anal sex was forbidden by the Bible and that this remained prohibited). Conservative Judaism
Judaism
also made a number of changes to the role of women in Judaism, including counting women in the minyan and ordaining women as rabbis. The latter was accomplished by simple vote on the faculty of the JTS. Orthodox Judaism
Judaism
holds that takkanot (rabbinical decrees) can only supplement and can never nullify Biblical law, and significant decisions must be accompanied by scholarly responsa citing sources and halakhic precedent. An example of how different views of the origin of Jewish
Jewish
law inform Conservative approaches to interpreting that law involves the CJLS's acceptance of rabbi Elie Kaplan Spitz's responsum decreeing the Biblical category of mamzer as "inoperative", in which The CJLS adopted the Responsum's view that of how, in the Conservative view of halakha, the "morality which we learn through the unfolding narrative of our tradition" informs the application of Mosaic law:

We cannot conceive of God
God
sanctioning undeserved suffering ... When a law of Torah
Torah
conflicts with morality, when the law is 'unpleasant,' we are committed to find a way to address the problem… We are willing to do explicitly what was largely implicit in the past, namely, to make changes when needed on moral grounds. It is our desire to strengthen Torah
Torah
that forces us to recognize, explicitly the overriding importance of morality, a morality which we learn from the larger, unfolding narrative of our tradition

The responsum cited several examples of how, in Spitz's view, the rabbinic sages declined to enforce punishments explicitly mandated by Torah
Torah
law. The examples include the "trial of the accused adulteress (Sotah)", the " Law
Law
of the Breaking of the Neck of the Heifer" and the application of the death penalty for the "rebellious child". Spitz argues that the punishment of the Mamzer
Mamzer
has been effectively inoperative for nearly two thousand years due to deliberate rabbinic inaction (with a few rule-proving counterexamples, including the 18th century Orthodox rabbi Ismael ha- Kohen
Kohen
of Modena, who decreed that a child should have the word "mamzer" tattooed to his forehead). Further he suggested that the rabbis have long regarded the punishment declared by the Torah
Torah
as immoral, and came to the conclusion that no court should agree to hear testimony on "mamzerut". His motion was passed by the CJLS. The decision represented a watershed for Conservative Judaism
Judaism
because it represented an explicit abrogation of a Biblical injunction on the grounds of contemporary morality, as distinct from exigency. The dissenters, who included rabbi Joel Roth as well as a partial concurrence by rabbi Daniel Nevins, argued for reaffirming the classical halakhic framework in which human decrees inform and often limit but never wholly abrogate law believed to be of Divine origin, stating that "we should acknowledge that God's law is beyond our authority to eliminate", but should continue the traditional approach of applying strict evidentiary rules and presumptions that tend to render enforcement unlikely. He also argued that the current framework is moral, both because proving mamzer status sufficiently beyond all doubt is already so difficult that it is rare, and because the mere existence and possibility of mamzerut status, even if rarely enforced, creates an important incentive for divorcing parties to obtain a get ( Jewish
Jewish
religious divorce) to avoid the sin of adultery. He cited a responsum by prominent Haredi Orthodox rabbi Ovadiah Yosef
Ovadiah Yosef
as an example of how the traditional approach works. Rabbi
Rabbi
Yosef was faced with the child of a woman who had left a religious marriage without religious divorce and had a child in the second marriage, seemingly an open-and-shut case of Mamzer
Mamzer
status. Rabbi
Rabbi
Yosef proceeded to systematically discredit the evidence that the former marriage had ever taken place. The Ketubah
Ketubah
was mysteriously not found and hence disqualified, and the officiating rabbi's testimony was never sufficiently corroborated and hence not credible. Rabbi
Rabbi
Yosef then found reason to doubt that the new husband was ever the father, finding that because the ex-husband occasionally delivered alimony personally, an ancient presumption (one of many) that any time a husband and wife are alone together the law presumes intercourse has taken place governed the case. He held that Jewish
Jewish
law could not disprove, and hence had to conclude, that the original husband really was the child's father and there was no case of Mamzer
Mamzer
status. Codes of Jewish
Jewish
law[edit] There are many formal codes of Jewish
Jewish
law that have developed over the past two thousand years. These codes have influenced, and in turn, have been influenced by, the responsa; History of Responsa thus provides an informative complement to the survey below. The Torah
Torah
and the Talmud
Talmud
are not formal codes of law - they are sources of law. The major codes of Jewish
Jewish
law:

The Mishnah, composed by rabbi Judah the Prince, in 200 CE, as a basic outline of the state of the Oral Law
Law
in his time. This was the framework upon which the Talmud
Talmud
was based; the Talmud's dialectic analysis of the content of the Mishna
Mishna
(gemara; completed c. 500) became the basis for all later halakhic decisions and subsequent codes. Codifications by the Geonim of the halakhic material in the Talmud. An early work, She'iltot ("Questions") by Achai of Shabcha (c. 752), discusses over 190 mitzvot – exploring and addressing various questions on these. The first legal codex proper, Halakhot Pesukot ("Decided Laws"), by Yehudai Gaon (c. 760), rearranges the Talmud passages in a structure manageable to the layman. (It was written in vernacular Aramaic, and subsequently translated into Hebrew
Hebrew
as Hilkhot Riu). Halakhot Gedolot ("Great Law
Law
Book"), by R. Simeon Kayyara, published two generations later, contains extensive additional material, mainly from Responsa and Monographs of the Geonim, and is presented in a form that is closer to the original Talmud
Talmud
language and structure. (Probably since it was distributed, also, amongst the newly established Ashkenazi
Ashkenazi
communities.) The She'iltot was influential on both subsequent works. The Hilchot of the Rif, rabbi Isaac
Isaac
Alfasi (1013–1103), summations of the legal material in the Talmud. Alfasi transcribed the Talmud's halakhic conclusions verbatim, without the surrounding deliberation; he also excludes all aggadic (non-legal, homiletic) matter. The Hilchot soon superseded the geonic codes, as it contained all the decisions and laws then relevant, and additionally, served as an accessible Talmudic commentary; it has been printed with almost every subsequent edition of the Talmud. The Mishneh Torah
Torah
by Maimonides
Maimonides
(1135–1204). This work encompasses the full range of Talmudic law; it is organized and reformulated in a logical system – in 14 books, 83 sections and 1000 chapters – with each halakha stated clearly. The Mishneh Torah
Torah
is very influential to this day, and several later works reproduce passages verbatim. It also includes a section on Metaphysics
Metaphysics
and fundamental beliefs. (Some claim this section draws heavily on Aristotelian science and metaphysics; others suggest that it is within the tradition of Saadia Gaon.) It is the main source of practical halakha for many Yemenite Jews
Jews
– mainly Baladi and Dor Daim – as well as for a growing community referred to as talmidei haRambam. The work of the Rosh, rabbi Asher ben Jehiel (1250?/1259?–1328), an abstract of the Talmud, concisely stating the final halakhic decision and quoting later authorities, notably Alfasi, Maimonides, and the Tosafists. This work superseded rabbi Alfasi's and has been printed with almost every subsequent edition of the Talmud. The Sefer Mitzvot Gadol (The "SeMaG") of rabbi Moses
Moses
ben Jacob
Jacob
of Coucy (first half of the 13th century, Coucy, Northern France). "SeMaG" is organised around the 365 negative and the 248 positive commandments, separately discussing each of them according to the Talmud
Talmud
(in light of the commentaries of Rashi
Rashi
and the Tosafot) and the other codes existent at the time. Sefer Mitzvot Katan ("SeMaK") by Isaac
Isaac
ben Joseph of Corbeil is an abridgement of the SeMaG, including additional practical halakha, as well as agaddic and ethical material. "The Mordechai" – by Mordecai ben Hillel, d.  Nuremberg
Nuremberg
1298 – serves both as a source of analysis, as well of decided law. Mordechai considered about 350 halakhic authorities, and was widely influential, particularly amongst the Ashkenazi
Ashkenazi
and Italian communities. Although organised around the Hilchot of the Rif, it is, in fact, an independent work. It has been printed with every edition of the Talmud since 1482. The Arba'ah Turim
Arba'ah Turim
(The Tur, lit. "The Four Columns") by rabbi Jacob ben Asher (1270–1343, Toledo, Spain). This work traces the halakha from the Torah
Torah
text and the Talmud
Talmud
through the Rishonim, with the Hilchot of Alfasi as its starting point. Ben Asher followed Maimonides's precedent in arranging his work in a topical order, however, the Tur covers only those areas of Jewish
Jewish
law that were in force in the author's time. The code is divided into four main sections; almost all codes since this time have followed the Tur's arrangement of material.

Orach Chayim: "The Way of Life" worship and ritual observance in the home and synagogue, through the course of the day, the weekly sabbath and the festival cycle. Yoreh De'ah: "Teach Knowledge" assorted ritual prohibitions, dietary laws and regulations concerning menstrual impurity. Even Ha'ezer: "The Rock of the Helpmate" marriage, divorce and other issues in family law. Choshen Mishpat: "The Breastplate of Judgment" The administration and adjudication of civil law.

The Beit Yosef, and the Shulchan Aruch
Shulchan Aruch
of rabbi Yosef Karo (1488–1575). The Beit Yosef is a huge commentary on the Tur in which rabbi Karo traces the development of each law from the Talmud
Talmud
through later rabbinical literature (examining thirty-two authorities, beginning with the Talmud
Talmud
and ending with the works of rabbi Israel Isserlein). The Shulchan Aruch
Shulchan Aruch
is, in turn, a condensation of the Beit Yosef – stating each ruling simply (literally translated, Shulchan Aruch means "set table"); this work follows the chapter divisions of the Tur. The Shulchan Aruch, together with its related commentaries, is considered by many to be the most authoritative compilation of halakha since the Talmud. In writing the Shulchan Aruch, rabbi Karo based his rulings on three authorities – Maimonides, Asher ben Jehiel (Rosh), and Isaac
Isaac
Alfasi (Rif); he considered the Mordechai in inconclusive cases. Sephardic Jews, generally, refer to the Shulchan Aruch as the basis for their daily practice. The works of rabbi Moshe Isserles
Moshe Isserles
("Rema"; Kraków, Poland, 1525 to 1572). Rema noted that the Shulchan Aruch
Shulchan Aruch
was based on the Sephardic tradition, and he created a series of glosses to be appended to the text of the Shulkhan Aruch for cases where Sephardi
Sephardi
and Ashkenazi customs differed (based on the works of Yaakov Moelin, Israel Isserlein, and Israel
Israel
Bruna). The glosses are called Hamapah, the "Tablecloth" for the "Set Table". His comments are now incorporated into the body of all printed editions of the Shulchan Aruch, typeset in a different script; today, "Shulchan Aruch" refers to the combined work of Karo and Isserles. Isserles' Darkhei Moshe is similarly a commentary on the Tur and the Beit Yosef. The Levush Malkhut ("Levush") of rabbi Mordecai Yoffe (c. 1530–1612). A ten volume work, five discussing halakha at a level "midway between the two extremes: the lengthy Beit Yosef of Caro on the one hand, and on the other Caro's Shulchan Aruch
Shulchan Aruch
together with the Mappah of Isserles, which is too brief", that particularly stresses the customs and practices of the Jews
Jews
of Eastern Europe. The Levush was exceptional among the codes, in that it treated certain Halakhot from a Kabbalistic standpoint. The Shulchan Aruch
Shulchan Aruch
HaRav of rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi
Shneur Zalman of Liadi
(c. 1800) was an attempt to recodify the law as it stood at that time– incorporating commentaries on the Shulchan Aruch, and subsequent responsa – and thus stating the decided halakha, as well as the underlying reasoning. The work was written, partly, so that laymen would be able to study Jewish
Jewish
law. Unfortunately, most of the work was lost in a fire prior to publication. It is the basis of practice for Chabad-Lubavitch
Chabad-Lubavitch
and other Hasidic groups, and is quoted as authoritative by many subsequent works, Hasidic and non-Hasidic alike. Works structured directly on the Shulchan Aruch, providing analysis in light of Acharonic material and codes. The Mishnah
Mishnah
Berurah of rabbi Yisroel Meir ha-Kohen, (the "Chofetz Chaim", Poland, 1838–1933) is a commentary on the "Orach Chayim" section of the Shulchan Aruch, discussing the application of each halakha in light of all subsequent Acharonic decisions. It has become the authoritative halakhic guide for much of Orthodox Ashkenazic Jewry in the postwar period. Aruch HaShulchan by rabbi Yechiel Michel Epstein (1829–1888) is a scholarly analysis of halakha through the perspective of the major Rishonim. The work follows the structure of the Tur and the Shulchan Aruch; rules dealing with vows, agriculture, and ritual purity, are discussed in a second work known as Aruch HaShulchan
Aruch HaShulchan
he'Atid. Kaf HaChaim on Orach Chayim and parts of Yoreh De'ah, by the Sephardi
Sephardi
sage Yaakov Chaim Sofer
Yaakov Chaim Sofer
( Baghdad
Baghdad
and Jerusalem, 1870–1939) is similar in scope, authority and approach to the Mishnah
Mishnah
Berurah. Yalkut Yosef, by rabbi Yitzhak Yosef, is a voluminous, widely cited and contemporary work of halakha, based on the rulings of rabbi Ovadia Yosef. " Layman oriented" digests of halakha. The Kitzur Shulchan Aruch
Shulchan Aruch
of Rabbi
Rabbi
Shlomo Ganzfried
Shlomo Ganzfried
( Hungary
Hungary
1804–1886), based on the very strict Hungarian customs of the 19th century, became immensely popular after its publication due to its simplicity. This work is not binding in the same way as the Mishneh Torah
Torah
or the Shulchan Aruch. It is still popular in Orthodox Judaism
Judaism
as a framework for study, if not always for practice. Chayei Adam and Chochmat Adam by Avraham Danzig (Poland, 1748–1820) are similar Ashkenazi
Ashkenazi
works, but are regarded as a more appropriate basis for practice.[citation needed] The Ben Ish Chai
Ben Ish Chai
by Yosef Chaim (Baghdad, 1832–1909) is a corresponding Sephardi
Sephardi
work. Peninei Halachah by Rabbi
Rabbi
Eliezer Melamed
Eliezer Melamed
(15 volumes thus far) covers a wide range of subjects, from shabbat to organ donations, and in addition to clearly posing the practical law - reflecting the customs of various communities - also discusses the spiritual foundations of the Halakhot. Temimei Haderech ("A Guide To Jewish
Jewish
Religious Practice") by rabbi Isaac
Isaac
Klein with contributions from the Committee on Jewish
Jewish
Law
Law
and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly. This scholarly work is based on the previous traditional law codes, but written from a Conservative Jewish
Jewish
point of view, and not accepted among Orthodox Jews.

See also[edit]

Judaism
Judaism
portal Law
Law
portal

Antinomianism Jewish
Jewish
ethics Jewish
Jewish
medical ethics Mishpat Ivri Sharia

References[edit]

^ "Halacha". Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary. ^ Louis Jacobs. "HALAKHAH". Encyclopaedia Judaica. 0.8 (2nd ed.). p. 252.  ^ a b Schiffman, Lawrence H. " Second Temple
Second Temple
and Hellenistic Judaism". Halakhah. Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception. 11. De Gruyter. pp. 2–8.  ^ Ketubot 30b ^ Louis Jacobs. "HALAKHAH". Encyclopaedia Judaica. 0.8 (2nd ed.). p. 256.  ^ Rema Choshen Mishpat Chapter 25 ^ Lieberman, Saul. "Rabbinic interpretation of scripture" and "The hermeneutic rules of the aggadah" in Hellenism in Jewish
Jewish
Palestine (NY, 1950) See also, Daube, David. "Rabbinic methods of interpretation and Hellenistic rhetoric" HUCA 22 (1949) 239ff. ^ "Vail course explores origins of Judaism". Vail Daily. July 13, 2015. “Just as science follows the scientific method, Judaism
Judaism
has its own system to ensure authenticity remains intact,” said Rabbi Zalman Abraham
Abraham
of JLI’s New York headquarters  ^ "FAQ for Humanistic Judaism, Reform Judaism, Humanists, Humanistic Jews, Congregation, Arizona, AZ". Oradam.org. Retrieved 2012-11-08.  ^ Jews, Christians, Muslims : a comparative introduction to monotheistic religions. Denny, Frederick Mathewson., Eire, Carlos M. N., Jaffee, Martin S., Corrigan, John, 1952- (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. 2012. ISBN 9780205018253. OCLC 695390082.  ^ Rubenstein, Jeffrey L. “Michael Berger. Rabbinic Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Xii, 226 Pp. -.” AJS Review, vol. 26, no. 2, 2002, pp. 356–359., doi:10.1017/S0364009402250114. ^ Satlow, Michael, and Daniel Picus. “Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.” Lecture. Providence, Brown University.

Bibliography[edit]

J. David
David
Bleich, Contemporary Halakhic Problems (5 vols), Ktav. ISBN 0-87068-450-7, ISBN 0-88125-474-6, ISBN 0-88125-315-4, ISBN 0-87068-275-X, Feldheim ISBN 1-56871-353-3 Menachem Elon, Ha-Mishpat ha-Ivri (trans. Jewish
Jewish
Law: History, Sources, Principles ISBN 0-8276-0389-4), Jewish
Jewish
Publication Society. ISBN 0-8276-0537-4 Jacob
Jacob
Katz, Divine Law
Law
in Human Hands — Case Studies in Halakhic Flexibility, Magnes Press. ISBN 965-223-980-1 Moshe Koppel, "Meta-Halakhah: Logic, Intuition, and the Unfolding of Jewish
Jewish
Law," ISBN 1-56821-901-6 Mendell Lewittes, Jewish
Jewish
Law: An Introduction, Jason Aronson. ISBN 1-56821-302-6 Daniel Pollack ed., Contrasts in American and Jewish
Jewish
Law, Ktav. ISBN 0-88125-750-8 Emanuel Quint, A Restatement of Rabbinic Civil Law
Law
(11 vols), Gefen Publishing. ISBN 0-87668-765-6, ISBN 0-87668-799-0, ISBN 0-87668-678-1, ISBN 0-87668-396-0, ISBN 0-87668-197-6, ISBN 1-56821-167-8, ISBN 1-56821-319-0, ISBN 1-56821-907-5, ISBN 0-7657-9969-3, ISBN 965-229-322-9, ISBN 965-229-323-7, ISBN 965-229-375-X Emanuel Quint, Jewish
Jewish
Jurisprudence: Its Sources & Modern Applications , Taylor and Francis. ISBN 3-7186-0293-8 Steven H. Resnicoff, Understanding Jewish
Jewish
Law, LexisNexis, 2012. ISBN 9781422490204 Joel Roth, Halakhic Process: A Systemic Analysis, Jewish
Jewish
Theological Seminary. ISBN 0-87334-035-3 Joseph Soloveitchik, Halakhic Man, Jewish
Jewish
Publication Society trans. Lawrence Kaplan. ISBN 0-8276-0397-5  "Halakah". Encyclopedia Americana. 1920.   Gilman, D. C.; Peck, H. T.; Colby, F. M., eds. (1905). "Halacha". New International Encyclopedia
New International Encyclopedia
(1st ed.). New York: Dodd, Mead. 

External links[edit]

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Halakha

Full-text resources of major halakhic works[edit]

Mishneh Torah

Hebrew: mechon-mamre.org; wikisource Translation: chabad.org

Arba'ah Turim

Hebrew: wikisource

Shulchan Aruch

Hebrew: chassidus.org at the Wayback Machine
Wayback Machine
(archived June 24, 2004); wikisource Translation: wikisource (incomplete); shulchanarach.com (incomplete)

Shulchan Aruch
Shulchan Aruch
HaRav

Hebrew: wikisource; chabadlibrary.org Shulchanaruchharav.com

Aruch HaShulchan

Hebrew: wikisource

Kitzur Shulchan Aruch

Hebrew: www.kitzur.net; shofar.net; wikisource Translation: Yona Newman (100% complete); torah.org (incomplete)

Ben Ish Chai

Hebrew: wikisource; shechem.org

Kaf HaChaim

Hebrew: hebrewbooks.org (volume 1; others available via search on site)

Mishnah
Mishnah
Berurah

Hebrew: wikisource; mishnaberura.com (With .mp3
.mp3
and .wma files); hebrewbooks.org Translation: torah.org

Chayei Adam

Hebrew: daat.ac.il

Chochmat Adam:

Hebrew: daat.ac.il

Peninei Halachah:

Hebrew: ph.yhb.org.il Translation: ph.yhb.org.il/en

Yalkut Yosef

Hebrew: yalkut.info

A Guide to Jewish
Jewish
Religious Practice:

Archived June 26, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.

A Halacha Wiki

Halachipedia.com Shulchanaruchharav.com

v t e

Halakha ( Jewish
Jewish
religious law)

Ethics

Chillul Hashem (Desecration of God's name) Geneivat da'at (Theft of the mind) Gezel sheina (Theft of sleep) Kiddush Hashem (Sanctification of God's name) Lashon hara
Lashon hara
(Derogatory information) Lifnei iver (Stumbling block in front of the blind) Noahide laws You shall not murder Yetzer hara

Ritual purity

Mikveh Niddah Ritual washing in Judaism Handwashing in Judaism Tumah
Tumah
and taharah

Modesty

Negiah Yichud Mechitza Judaism
Judaism
and sexuality Forbidden relationships in Judaism Gender separation in Judaism Homosexuality
Homosexuality
and Judaism

Agrarian laws

Tithes in Judaism Terumah First tithe Second tithe Poor man's tithe Terumat hamaaser Demai Orlah Bikkurim (First-fruits) Sicaricon ( Jewish
Jewish
law) Hallah

Halakhic principles

Aveira Bemeizid, beshogeg, and beones B'rov am hadrat melech Chumra Dina d'malkhuta dina D'Oraita and D'Rabbanan One commandment leads to another Ikar v'tafel Marit ayin Neder Osek b'mitzvah patur min hamitzvah Pikuach nefesh Positive commandment Sfeka d'yoma Self-sacrifice in Jewish
Jewish
law Shinuy Shomea k'oneh Testimony Toch k'dei dibur Yad soledet bo Zmanim Relative hour ( Jewish
Jewish
law)

Punishment

Capital punishment in Judaism Kareth

Related boxes

High Holidays Passover Shabbat Sukkot Kashrut

v t e

Jews
Jews
and Judaism

Outline of Judaism Index of Jewish
Jewish
history-related articles

History

Timeline Israelites Origins of Judaism Ancient Israel
Israel
and Judah Second Temple
Second Temple
period Rabbinic Judaism Middle Ages Haskalah Zionism

Population

Assimilation Diaspora

Ashkenazi Sephardi Mizrahi

Languages

Hebrew Judeo-Arabic Judaeo-Spanish Yiddish

Lists of Jews Persecution

Antisemitism

Philosophy

Beliefs

Mitzvah

Chosen people Conversion Eschatology

Messiah

Ethics God Halakha Kabbalah Land of Israel Who is a Jew?

Schisms

Religious movements

Orthodox Haredi Hasidic Conservative Reform Karaite relations

Secularism

Literature

Tanakh

Torah Nevi'im Ketuvim

Rabbinic

Mishnah Talmud Midrash

Kabbalah
Kabbalah
texts

Zohar

Shulchan Aruch Siddur Hebrew
Hebrew
literature

Culture

Calendar

Holidays

Cuisine

Kashrut

Education Leadership

Rabbi

Marriage Music Names Politics Prayer

Synagogue Hazzan

Symbolism

Studies

Ashkenazi
Ashkenazi
intelligence Genetics Jew (word) Jewish
Jewish
Virtual Library Relations with other Abrahamic religions

Christianity Islam

 Category: Jews
Jews
and Judaism Judaism
Judaism
portal Judaism
Judaism
– book

v t e

Orthodox Judaism

Branches

Haredi Hasidic Modern

People

Orthodox Jews Rabbis Hasidic dynasties

Education

Torah
Torah
study Shiur Chavrusa Chavurah Yeshiva Mesivta Beis Yaakov Kollel Torah
Torah
Umesorah Chinuch Atzmai

Politics

Agudath Israel Shas United Torah
Torah
Judaism
Judaism
(UTJ) National Union (NU) The Jewish
Jewish
Home

Rabbinates

Rabbanut Edah HaChareidis Central Rabbinical Congress Moetzes Rabbinical Council of America (RCA) Agudas HaRabbonim United Synagogue Union of Orthodox Hebrew
Hebrew
Congregations (UOHC)

Organizations

Orthodox Union
Orthodox Union
(OU) Young Israel Aguda Mizrachi

Laws

Shulchan Aruch Halakha Responsa

Philosophies

Torah
Torah
Judaism Hasidism Religious Zionism Torah
Torah
im Derech Eretz Torah
Torah
Umadda Da'as Torah

Category:Orthodox Judaism

v t e

Law

Core subjects

Administrative law Constitutional law Contract Criminal law Deed Equity Evidence International law Law
Law
of obligations Procedure

Civil Criminal

Property law Public law Restitution Statutory law Tort

Other subjects

Agricultural law Aviation law Banking law Bankruptcy Commercial law Competition law Conflict of laws Construction law Consumer protection Corporate law Cyberlaw Election law Energy law Entertainment law Environmental law Family
Family
law Financial regulation Health law Immigration law Intellectual property International criminal law International human rights International slavery laws Labour Law
Law
of war Legal archaeology Legal fiction Maritime law Media law Military
Military
law Probate

Estate Will and testament

Product liability Public international law Space law Sports law Tax law Transport law Trust law Women in law

Sources of law

Charter Constitution Custom Divine right Human rights Natural and legal rights Case law

Precedent

Law
Law
making

Ballot measure Codification Decree

Edict Executive order Proclamation

Legislation

Delegated legislation Regulation Rulemaking

Promulgation Repeal Treaty Statutory law

Statute Act of Parliament Act of Congress
Act of Congress
(US)

Legal systems

Civil law Common law Chinese law Legal pluralism Religious law

Canon law Hindu law Jain law Jewish
Jewish
law Sharia

Roman law Socialist law Statutory law Xeer Yassa

Legal theory

Critical legal studies Comparative law Feminist Law
Law
and economics Legal formalism History Natural law International legal theory Principle of legality Rule of law Sociology

Jurisprudence

Adjudication Administration of justice Criminal justice Court-martial Dispute resolution Fiqh Lawsuit/Litigation Legal opinion Legal remedy Judge

Justice
Justice
of the peace Magistrate

Judgment Judicial review Jurisdiction Jury Justice Practice of law

Attorney Barrister Counsel Lawyer Legal representation Prosecutor Solicitor

Question of fact Question of law Trial Trial
Trial
advocacy Trier of fact Verdict

Legal institutions

Bureaucracy The bar The bench Civil society Court Election commission Executive Judiciary Law
Law
enforcement Legal education

Law
Law
school

Legislature Military Police Political party Tribunal

Category Index Ou