The First Bulgarian Empire (Old Bulgarian: ц︢рьство бл︢гарское, ts'rstvo bl'garskoe) was a medieval Bulgarian state that existed in southeastern Europe between the 7th and 11th centuries AD. It was founded circa 681 when Bulgar tribes led by Asparukh moved to the north-eastern Balkans. There they secured Byzantine recognition of their right to settle south of the Danube by defeating – possibly with the help of local South Slavic tribes – the Byzantine army led by Constantine IV. At the height of its power, Bulgaria spread from the Danube Bend to the Black Sea and from the Dnieper River to the Adriatic Sea.

As the state solidified its position in the Balkans, it entered into a centuries-long interaction, sometimes friendly and sometimes hostile, with the Byzantine Empire. Bulgaria emerged as Byzantium's chief antagonist to its north, resulting in several wars. The two powers also enjoyed periods of peace and alliance, most notably during the Second Arab siege of Constantinople, where the Bulgarian army broke the siege and destroyed the Arab army, thus preventing an Arab invasion of Southeastern Europe. Byzantium had a strong cultural influence on Bulgaria, which also led to the eventual adoption of Christianity in 864. After the disintegration of the Avar Khaganate, the country expanded its territory northwest to the Pannonian Plain. Later the Bulgarians confronted the advance of the Pechenegs and Cumans, and achieved a decisive victory over the Magyars, forcing them to establish themselves permanently in Pannonia.

During the late 9th and early 10th centuries, Simeon I achieved a string of victories over the Byzantines. Thereafter, he was recognized with the title of Emperor, and proceeded to expand the state to its greatest extent. After the annihilation of the Byzantine army in the battle of Anchialus in 917, the Bulgarians laid siege to Constantinople in 923 and 924. The Byzantines, however, eventually recovered, and in 1014, under Basil II, inflicted a crushing defeat on the Bulgarians at the Battle of Kleidion. By 1018, the last Bulgarian strongholds had surrendered to the Byzantine Empire, and the First Bulgarian Empire had ceased to exist. It was succeeded by the Second Bulgarian Empire in 1185.

After the adoption of Christianity, Bulgaria became the cultural center of Slavic Europe. Its leading cultural position was further consolidated with the invention of the Glagolitic and Early Cyrillic alphabets shortly after in the capital Preslav, and literature produced in Old Bulgarian soon began spreading north. Old Bulgarian became the lingua franca of much of Eastern Europe and it came to be known as Old Church Slavonic. In 927, the fully independent Bulgarian Patriarchate was officially recognized.

The Bulgars and other non-Slavic tribes in the empire gradually adopted an essentially foreign Slavic language. Since the late 9th century, the names Bulgarians and Bulgarian gained prevalence and became permanent designations for the local population, both in literature and in common parlance. The development of Old Church Slavonic literacy had the effect of preventing the assimilation of the South Slavs into neighbouring cultures, while stimulating the formation of a distinct Bulgarian identity.


The First Bulgarian Empire became known simply as Bulgaria[8] since its recognition by the Byzantine Empire in 681. Some historians use the terms Danube Bulgaria,[9] First Bulgarian State,[10][11] or First Bulgarian Tsardom (Empire). Between 681 and 864 the country was also known as the Bulgarian Khanate,[12] Danube Bulgarian Khanate, or Danube Bulgar Khanate[13][14] in order to differentiate it from Volga Bulgaria, which emerged from another Bulgar group. During its early existence, the country was also called the Bulgar state[15] or Bulgar qaghanate.[16] Between 864 and 917/927, the country was known as the Principality of Bulgaria or Knyazhestvo Bulgaria. In English language sources, the country is often known as the Bulgarian Empire.[17]


The Balkans during the early Migration Period

The eastern Balkan Peninsula was originally inhabited by the Thracians who were a group of Proto-Indo-European tribes.[18] The whole region as far north as the Danube River was gradually incorporated into the Roman Empire by the 1st century AD.[19] The decline of the Roman Empire after the 3rd century AD and the devastating invasions of Goths and Huns left much of the region devastated, depopulated and in economic decline by the 5th century.[20] The empire's successor, the Eastern Roman Empire, called by later historians the Byzantine Empire, could not exercise effective control in these territories other that in the coastal areas and certain cities in the interior. Nonetheless, it never relinquished the claim to the whole region up to the Danube. A series of administrative, legislative, military and economic reforms somewhat improved the situation but despite these reforms disorder continued in much of the Balkans.[21] The reign of Emperor Justinian I (r. 527–565) saw temporary recovery of control and reconstruction of a number of fortresses but after his death the empire was unable to face the threat of the Slavs due to the significant reduction of revenue and manpower.[22]

Slavic migrations to the Balkans

The Slavs, of Indo-European origin, were first mentioned in written sources to inhabit the territories to the north of the Danube in the 5th century AD but most historians agree that they had arrived earlier.[23] The group of Slavs that came to be known as the South Slavs was divided into Antes and Sclaveni who spoke the same language.[23][24] The Slavic incursions in the Balkans increased during the second half of Justinian I's reign and while these were initially pillaging raids, large-scale settlement began in the 570s and 580s.[24][25][26] This migration is associated with the arrival of the Avars who settled in the plains of Pannonia between the rivers Danube and Tisza in the 560s subjugating various Bulgar and Slavic tribes in the process.[24][27]

Consumed in bitter wars with the Persian Sasanian Empire in the east, the Byzantines had little resources to confront the Slavs.[28][29] The Slavs came in large numbers and the lack of political organisation made it very difficult to stop them because there was no political leader to defeat in battle and thereby force their retreat.[28] As the wars with Persia persisted, the 610s and 620s saw a new and even larger migration wave with the Slavs penetrating further south into the Balkans, reaching Thessaly, Thrace and Peloponnese and raiding some islands in the Aegean Sea.[30] The Byzantines held out Salonica and a number of coastal towns but beyond these areas the imperial authority in the Balkans disappeared.[31]

The Bulgars

The Bulgarian colonies after the fall of Old Great Bulgaria in the 7th century.
Early Bulgar Khanate's zones of tribal control in the late 7th. century AD.

The Bulgars were semi-nomadic warrior tribes originating from Central Asia whose exact ethnic origin is controversial. They spoke a form of Turkic language and during their migration westwards they absorbed other ethnic groups and cultural influences, including Hunnic, Iranian and Indo-European people.[32][33] The Bulgars included the tribes of Onogurs, Utigurs and Kutrigurs, among others.[34][35]

The first clear mention of the Bulgars in written sources dates from 480, when they served as the allies of the Byzantine Emperor Zeno (r. 474–491) against the Ostrogoths[36] although an obscure reference to Ziezi ex quo Vulgares, with Ziezi being an offspring of Biblical Shem, son of Noah, is in the Chronography of 354.[37][38] In the 490s the Kutrigurs had moved west of the Black Sea while the Utigurs inhabited the steppes to the east of them. In the first half of the 6th century the Bulgars occasionally raided the Byzantine Empire but in the second half of the century the Kutrigurs were subjugated by the Avar Khaganate and the Utigurs came under the rule of the Western Turkic Khaganate.[39][40]

As the power of the Western Turks faded in the 600s the Avars reasserted their domination over the Bulgars. Between 630 and 635 Khan Kubrat of the Dulo clan managed to unite the main Bulgar tribes and to declare independence from the Avars, creating a powerful confederation called Old Great Bulgaria, also known as Patria Onoguria, between the Black Sea, the Sea of Azov and the Caucasus.[41][42] Kubrat, who was baptised in Constantinople in 619, concluded an alliance with the Byzantine Emperor Heraclius (r. 610–641) and the two countries remained in good relations until Kubrat's death between 650 and 663.[41] Kubrat fought with the Khazars in the east but after his demise Old Great Bulgaria disintegrated under strong Khazar pressure in 668[43] and his five sons parted with their followers. The eldest Batbayan remained in his homeland as Kubrat's successor and eventually became a Khazar vassal. The second brother Kotrag migrated to the middle Volga region and founded Volga Bulgaria.[44] The third brother Asparukh led his people west to the lower Danube.[41] The fourth one, Kuber, initially settled in Pannonia under Avar suzerainty but revolted and moved to the region of Macedonia, while the fifth brother Alcek settled in central Italy.[45][46]


Establishment and consolidation

A map of the Bulgarian Empire in the late 7th and 8th centuries
Bulgaria at the turn of the 7th century

The Bulgars of Asparukh moved westwards to what is now Bessarabia, subdued the territories to the north of the Danube in modern Wallachia, and established themselves in the Danube Delta.[47] In the 670s they crossed the Danube into Scythia Minor, nominally a Byzantine province, whose steppe grasslands and pastures were important for the large herd stocks of the Bulgars in addition to the grazing grounds to the west of the Dniester River already under their control.[46][48][49] In 680 the Byzantine Emperor Constantine IV (r. 668–685), having recently defeated the Arabs, led an expedition at the head of a huge army and fleet to drive off the Bulgars but suffered a disastrous defeat at the hands of Asparukh at Onglos, a swampy region in or around the Danube Delta where the Bulgars had set a fortified camp.[47][50] The Bulgars advanced south, crossed the Balkan Mountains and invaded Thrace.[51] In 681, the Byzantines were compelled to sign a humiliating peace treaty, forcing them to acknowledge Bulgaria as an independent state, to cede the territories to the north of the Balkan Mountains and to pay an annual tribute.[47][52] In his universal chronicle the Western European author Sigebert of Gembloux remarked that the Bulgarian state was established in 680.[53] This was the first state that the empire recognised in the Balkans and the first time it legally surrendered claims to part of its Balkan dominions.[47] The Byzantine chronicler Theophanes the Confessor wrote of the treaty:

...the Emperor [Constantine IV] signed peace with them [the Bulgars], and agreed to pay them tribute for shame of the Romans and for our many sins. For it was wondrous for faraway and close peoples to hear that he, who made everyone pay him tribute – to the east and to the west, to the north and to the south, had been defeated by this unclean and newly emerged people.[51][54]

The relations between the Bulgars and the local Slavs is a matter of debate depending on the interpretation of the Byzantine sources.[55] Vasil Zlatarski asserts that they concluded a treaty[56] but most historians agree that they were subjugated.[55][57] The Bulgars were superior organisationally and militarily and came to dominate politically the new state but there was cooperation between them and the Slavs for the protection of the country. The Slavs were allowed to retain their chiefs, to abide to their customs and in return they were to pay tribute in kind and to provide foot soldiers for the army.[58] The Seven Slavic tribes were relocated to the west to protect the frontier with the Avar Khaganate, while the Severi were resettled in the eastern Balkan Mountains to guard the mountain passes to the Byzantine Empire.[55] The number of Asparukh's Bulgars is difficult to estimate. Vasil Zlatarski and John Van Antwerp Fine Jr. suggest that they were not particularly numerous, numbering some 10,000,[59][60] while Steven Runciman considers that the tribe must had been of considerable dimensions.[61] The Bulgars settled mainly in the north-east, establishing the capital at Pliska, which was initially a colossal encampment of 23 km2 protected with earthen ramparts.[59][49]

To the north-east the war with the Khazars persisted and in 700 Khan Asparukh perished in battle with them.[62][63] Despite this setback the consolidation of the country continued under Asparukh's successor, Khan Tervel (r. 700–721). In 705 he assisted the deposed Byzantine Emperor Justinian II to regain his throne in return of the area Zagore in Northern Thrace, which was the first expansion of Bulgaria to the south of the Balkan mountains.[63] In addition Tervel obtained the almost imperial title Caesar[64] and sitting enthroned besides the Emperor received the obeisance of the citizenry of Constantinople and numerous gifts.[63][64] However, three years later Justinian tried to regain the ceded territory by force, but his army was defeated at Anchialus.[65] Skirmishes continued until 716 when Khan Tervel signed an important agreement with Byzantium that defined the borders and the Byzantine tribute, regulated trade relations and provided for prisoners and fugitives exchange.[64][66] When the Arabs laid siege to Constantinople in 717–718 Tervel dispatched his army to help the besieged city. In the decisive battle before the Walls of Constantinople the Bulgarians slaughtered between 22,000[67] and 30,000[68] Arabs forcing them to abandon the undertaking. Most historians agree that Byzantine-Bulgarian victory was the most important one for stopping the Arab offences against Europe.[66]

Internal instability and struggle for survival

A golden jug
A golden jug from the Sannicolau Mare, Romania depicting a warrior with his captive. Experts cannot agree if this warrior is Bulgar, Khazar or Avar

With the demise of Khan Sevar (r. 738–753) the ruling Dulo clan died out and the Khanate fell into a long political crisis during which the young country was on the verge of destruction. In just fifteen years seven Khans reigned, and all of them were murdered. The only surviving sources of this period are Byzantine and present only the Byzantine point of view of the ensuing political turmoil in Bulgaria.[66] They describe two factions struggling for power – one that sought peaceful relations with the Empire, which was dominant until 755, and one that favoured war.[66] These sources present the relations with the Byzantine Empire as the main issue in this internal struggle and do not mention the other reasons, which could have been more important for the Bulgarian elite.[66] It is likely that the relationship between the politically dominant Bulgars and the more numerous Slavs was the main issue behind the struggle but there is no evidence about the aims of the rival factions.[69] Zlatarski speculates that the old Bulgar military aristocracy was leaning towards war while other Bulgars supported by the majority of the Slavs were inclined for peace with Byzantium.[70]

The internal instability was used by the "soldier Emperor" Constantine V (r. 745–775), who launched nine major campaigns aiming to eliminate Bulgaria.[71] Having contained the Arab threat during the first part of his reign, Constantine V was able to concentrate his forces on Bulgaria after 755.[72] He defeated the Bulgarians at Marcellae in 756, Anchialus in 763 and Berzitia in 774, but lost the battle of the Rishki Pass in 759 in addition to hundreds of ships lost to storms in the Black Sea. The Byzantine military successes further deteriorated the crisis in Bulgaria but on the other hand rallied together many different fractions to resist the Byzantine advance in that period of political volatility and military setbacks, as shown at the council of 766 when the nobility and the "armed people" denounced Khan Sabin with the words "Thanks to you, the Romans will enslave Bulgaria!".[72][73] In 774 Khan Telerig (r. 768–777) tricked Constantine V into revealing his spies at the Bulgarian court in Pliska and had them all executed.[72] The next year Constantine V died during a retaliatory campaign against Bulgaria.[74][75] Despite being able to defeat the Bulgarians several times the Byzantines were able neither to conquer Bulgaria, nor to impose their suzerainty and a lasting peace, which is a testimony to the resilience, fighting skills and ideological coherence of the Bulgarian state.[76][77] The devastation brought to the country by the nine campaigns of Constantine V firmly rallied the Slavs behind the Bulgars and greatly increased the dislike of the Byzantines, turning Bulgaria into a hostile neighbour.[76] The hostilities continued until 792 when Khan Kardam (r. 777–803) achieved an important victory in the battle of Marcelae, forcing the Byzantines once again to pay tribute to the Khans.[78] As a result of the victory, the crisis was finally overcome, and Bulgaria entered the new century stable, stronger, and consolidated.[79]

Territorial expansion

A page of a medieval manuscript
Khan Krum defeats the Byzantine Emperor Nicephorus I in the battle of the Varbitsa Pass, Manasses Chronicle
A page of a medieval manuscript
Khan Krum feasts with the scull cup of Nicephorus after the victory at the Varbitsa Pass, Manasses Chronicle

During the reign of Khan Krum (r. 803–814) Bulgaria doubled in size and expanded southward and to the northwest, occupying the lands along the middle Danube and Transylvania. Between 804 and 806 the Bulgarian armies thoroughly eliminated the Avar Khaganate, which had suffered a crippling blow by the Franks in 796, and a border with the Frankish Empire was established along the middle Danube or Tisza.[76] Prompted by the Byzantine moves to consolidate their hold on the Slavs in Macedonia and northern Greece and in response to a Byzantine raid against the country, the Bulgarians confronted the Byzantine Empire.[80][81] In 808 they raided the valley of the Struma River, defeating a Byzantine army, and in 809 captured the important city Serdica (modern Sofia).[80][82][83] In 811 the Byzantine Emperor Nicephorus I launched a massive offensive against Bulgaria, seized, plundered and burned down the capital Pliska but on the way back the Byzantine army was decisively defeated in the battle of the Varbitsa Pass. Nicephorus I himself was slain along with most of his troops, and his skull was lined with silver and used as a drinking cup.[84][85] Krum took the initiative and in 812 moved the war towards Thrace, capturing the key Black Sea port of Messembria and defeating the Byzantines once more at Versinikia in 813 before proposing a generous peace settlement.[82][86] However, during the negotiations the Byzantines attempted to assassinate Krum. In response, the Bulgarians pillaged Eastern Thrace and seized the important city of Adrianople, resettling its 10,000 inhabitants in "Bulgaria across the Danube".[87][88] Krum made enhanced preparation to capture Constantinople: 5,000 iron-plated wagons were built to carry the siege equipment; the Byzantines even pleaded for help from the Frankish Emperor Louis the Pious.[89] Due to the sudden death of Krum on 14 April 814, however, the campaign was never launched.[87] Khan Krum implemented legal reform and issued the first known written law code of Bulgaria that established equal rules for all peoples living within the country's boundaries, intending to reduce poverty and to strengthen the social ties in his vastly enlarged state.[90][91]

Bulgar soldiers slaughter Christians, from the Menologion of Basil II, 10th century.

Krum's successor Khan Omurtag (r. 814–831) concluded a 30-year peace treaty with the Byzantines, thus allowing both countries to restore their economies and finance after the bloody conflicts in the first decade of the century, establishing the border along the Erkesia trench between Debeltos on the Black Sea and the valley of the Maritsa River at Kalugerovo.[92][93] To the west the Bulgarians were in control of Belgrade (whose modern name was first known as Alba Bulgarica) by the 820s and the northwestern boundaries with the Frankish Empire were firmly settled along the middle Danube by 827.[94][95][16] To the north-east Omurtag fought the Khazars along the Dnieper River, which was the easternmost limit of Bulgaria.[96] Extensive building was undertaken in the capital Pliska, including the construction of a magnificent palace, pagan temples, ruler's residence, fortress, citadel, water-main, and bath, mainly from stone and brick.[95][97] Omurtag started in 814 persecution of Christians,[98] in particular against the Byzantine prisoners of war settled north of the Danube. Menologion of Basil II, glorifies Emperor Basil II as a warrior defending Orthodox Christendom against the attacks of the pagan Bulgars. The expansion to the south and south-west continued under Omurtag's successors under the guidance of the capable kavhan (First Minister) Isbul. During the short reign of Khan Malamir (r. 831–836), the important city of Philippopolis (Plovdiv) was incorporated into the country. Under Khan Presian (r. 836–852), the Bulgarians took most of Macedonia, and the borders of the country reached the Adriatic Sea near Valona and Aegean Sea.[16] Byzantine historians do not mention any resistance against the Bulgarian expansion in Macedonia, leading to the conclusion that the expansion was largely peaceful. With this, Bulgaria had become the dominant power in the Balkans.[16] The advances further west was blocked by the development of a new Slavic state under Byzantine patronage, the Principality of Serbia.[16] Between 839 and 842 the Bulgarians waged war on the Serbs but did not make any progress. Historian Mark Whittow asserts that the claim for a Serb victory in that war in De Administrando Imperio was a wishful Byzantine thinking[16] but notes that any Serb submission to the Bulgarians went no further than the payment of tribute.[16]

A map of the Bulgarian Empire in the 9th century
Bulgaria after the territorial expansion under Krum, Omurtag and Presian

The reign of Boris I (r. 852–889) began with numerous setbacks. For ten years the country fought against the Byzantine Empire, Eastern Francia, Great Moravia, the Croats and the Serbs forming several unsuccessful alliances and changing sides.[99][100] In August 863 there was a period of 40 days of earthquakes and there was a lean year, which caused famine throughout the country. To cap it all, there was an incursion of locusts. Yet, despite all military setbacks and natural disasters the skilful diplomacy of Boris I prevented any territorial losses and kept the realm intact.[99] In this complex international situation Christianity had become attractive as a religion by the mid 9th-century because it provided better opportunities for forging reliable alliances and diplomatic ties.[101] Taking this into account, as well as a variety of internal factors, Boris I converted to Christianity in 864, assuming the title Knyaz (Prince).[101] Taking advantage of the struggle between the Papacy in Rome and the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, Boris I brilliantly manoeuvred to assert the independence of the newly established Bulgarian Church.[102] To check the possibility of Byzantine interference in the internal matters of Bulgaria, he sponsored the disciples of the brothers Cyril and Methodius to create literature in Old Bulgarian language.[103] Boris I dealt ruthlessly with the opposition to the Christianisation of Bulgaria, crushing a revolt of the nobility in 866 and overthrowing his own son Vladimir (r. 889–893)[a] after he attempted to restore the traditional religion.[104] In 893 he convened the Council of Preslav where it was decided that the capital of Bulgaria was to be moved from Pliska to Preslav, the Byzantine clergy was to be banished from the country and replaced with Bulgarian clerics, and Old Bulgarian language was to replace the Greek in liturgy.[105] Bulgaria was to become the principle threat for the stability and security of the Byzantine Empire in the 10th century.[106]

Golden Age

The decisions of the Council of Preslav brought an end to the Byzantine hopes to exert influence over the newly Christianized country.[107][108] In 894 the Byzantines moved the Bulgarian market from Constantinople to Thessaloniki, affecting the commercial interests of Bulgaria and the principle of Byzantine–Bulgarian trade, regulated under the Treaty of 716 and later agreements on the most favoured nation basis.[109][110][111] The new Prince, Simeon I (r. 893–927), who came to be known as Simeon the Great, declared war and defeated the Byzantine army in Thrace.[112][113] The Byzantines turned for aid to the Magyars, who at the time inhabited the steppes to the north-east of Bulgaria. The Magyars scored two victories over the Bulgarians and pillaged Dobrudzha but Simeon I allied with the Pechenegs further east and in 895 the Bulgarian army inflicted a crushing defeat on the Magyars in the steppes along the Southern Bug River. At the same time, the Pechenegs advanced westwards and prevented the Magyars from returning to their homeland.[114] The blow was so heavy that the Magyars were forced to migrate west, eventually settling in the Pannonian Basin, where they eventually established the Kingdom of Hungary.[115][114] In 896 the Byzantines were routed in the decisive battle of Boulgarophygon and pleaded for peace that confirmed the Bulgarian domination on the Balkans,[116] restored the status of Bulgaria as a most favoured nation, abolished the commercial restrictions and obliged the Byzantine Empire to pay annual tribute.[117][118] The peace treaty remained in force until 912 although Simeon I did violate it following the sack of Thessaloniki in 904, extracting further territorial concessions in Macedonia.[119]

a painting depicting Bulgarian Emperor Simeon I
Emperor Simeon I: The Morning Star of Slavonic Literature, painting by Alfons Mucha

In 913 the Byzantine emperor Alexander provoked a bitter war after resolving to discontinue paying an annual tribute to Bulgaria.[120] However, the military and ideological initiative was held by Simeon I, who was seeking casus belli to fulfil his ambition to be recognized as Emperor (in Bulgarian, Tsar) and to conquer Constantinople, creating a joint Bulgarian–Roman state.[121] In 917, the Bulgarian army dealt a crushing defeat to the Byzantines at the battle of Achelous, resulting in Bulgaria's total military supremacy in the Balkans.[122][123] In the words of Theophanes Continuatus "a bloodshed occurred, that had not happened in centuries",[124] and Leo the Deacon witnessed piles of bones of perished soldiers on the battlefield 50 years later.[125] The Bulgarians built on their success with further victories at Katasyrtai in 917, Pegae in 921 and Constantinople in 922. The Bulgarians also captured the important city of Adrianople in Thrace and seized the capital of the Theme of Hellas, Thebes, deep in southern Greece.[126][127] Following the disaster at Achelous, the Byzantine diplomacy incited the Principality of Serbia to attack Bulgaria from the west, but this assault was easily contained. In 924, the Serbs ambushed and defeated a small Bulgarian army,[128] provoking a major retaliatory campaign that ended with Bulgaria's annexation of Serbia at the end of that year.[129][130] Further expansion in the Western Balkans was checked by King Tomislav of Croatia, who was a Byzantine ally and defeated a Bulgarian invasion in 926.[131][132] Simeon I was aware that he needed naval support to conquer Constantinople and in 922 sent envoys to the Fatimid caliph Ubayd Allah al-Mahdi Billah in Mahdia to negotiate the assistance of the powerful Arab navy. The caliph sent representatives to Bulgaria to arrange an alliance but his emissaries were captured en route by the Byzantines near the Calabrian coast. The Byzantine Emperor Romanos I Lekapenos managed to avert a Bulgarian–Arab alliance by showering the Arabs with generous gifts.[133][134] The war dragged on until Simeon I's death in May 927. By then Bulgaria controlled almost all Byzantine possessions in the Balkans, but without a fleet did not attempt to storm Constantinople.[135]

Both countries were exhausted by the huge military efforts that had taken a heavy toll on the population and economy. Simeon's successor Peter I (r. 927–969) negotiated a favourable peace treaty. The Byzantines agreed to recognize him as Emperor of Bulgaria and the Bulgarian Orthodox Church as an independent Patriarchate, as well as to pay an annual tribute.[136][137][138] The peace was reinforced with a marriage between Peter and Romanos's granddaughter Irene Lekapene.[137][139] This agreement ushered in a period of 40 years of peaceful relations between the two powers. During the first years of his reign, Peter I faced revolts by two of his three brothers, John in 928 and Michael in 930, but both were quelled.[140] During most of his subsequent rule until 965, Peter I presided over a Golden Age of the Bulgarian state in a period of political consolidation, economic expansion and cultural activity.[141][142]

Decline and fall

A map of the Bulgarian Empire in the late 10th and early 11th centuries
Bulgaria under the rule of Emperor Samuel

Despite the treaty and the largely peaceful era that followed, the strategic position of the Bulgarian Empire remained difficult. The country was surrounded by aggressive neighbours – the Magyars to the north-west, the Pechenegs and the growing power of Kievan Rus' to the north-east, and the Byzantine Empire to the south, which proved to be an unreliable neighbour.[143] Bulgaria suffered several devastating Magyar raids between 934 and 965. The growing insecurity, as well as expanding influence of the landed nobility and the higher clergy at the expense of the personal privileges of the peasantry, led to the emergence of Bogomilism, a dualistic heretic sect that in the subsequent decades and centuries spread to the Byzantine Empire, northern Italy and southern France (cf. Cathars).[144] To the south, the Byzantine Empire reversed the course of the Byzantine–Arab wars against the declining Abbasid Caliphate and in 965 discontinued the payment of the tribute, leading to sharp deterioration of the bilateral relations.[145] In 968 the Byzantines incited Kievan Rus' to invade Bulgaria. In two years the Kievan Prince Svyatoslav I defeated the Bulgarian army, captured Preslav and established his capital at the important Bulgarian city of Preslavets (meaning "Little Preslav").[146] In this desperate situation the ageing Peter I abdicated, leaving the crown to his son Boris II (r. 969–971), who had little choice but to cooperate with Svyatoslav.[147] The unexpected success of the Rus' campaigns led to a confrontation with the Byzantine Empire.[146] The Byzantine Emperor John I Tzimiskes eventually defeated Svyatoslav's forces and compelled him to leave the Balkans in 971.[148][149] In the course of their campaign the Byzantines seized Preslav and detained Boris II. Initially John I Tzimiskes presented himself as a liberator but Boris II was promptly forced to ritually abdicate in Constantinople.[150] Although at the time the Byzantines controlled only the eastern regions of the country, Bulgaria was proclaimed a Byzantine province.[151]

The lands to the west of the Iskar River remained free and the Bulgarians were able to regroup headed by the four Cometopuli brothers.[152] By 976, the youngest of them, Samuel, concentrated all power in his hands following the death of his eldest siblings. When in 976 the rightful heir to the throne, Boris II's brother Roman (r. 971–997), escaped from captivity in Constantinople, he was recognized as Emperor by Samuel,[153][b] who remained the chief commander of the Bulgarian army. Peace was impossible because as a result of the symbolic ending of the Bulgarian Empire following Boris II's abdication, Roman and later Samuel, were seen as rebels and the Byzantine Emperor was bound to enforce the imperial sovereignty over them.[153] This led to more than 40 years of increasingly bitter warfare.[153] A capable general and good politician, at first Samuel managed to turn the fortunes to the Bulgarians. The new Byzantine Emperor Basil II was decisively defeated in the Battle of the Gates of Trajan in 986 and barely escaped with his life.[154][155] The Byzantine poet John Geometres wrote of the defeat:

Even if the sun would have come down, I would have never thought that the Moesian [Bulgarian] arrows were stronger than the Ausonian [Roman, Byzantine] spears. ... And when you, Phaethon [Sun], descend to the earth with your gold-shining chariot, tell the great soul of the Caesar[c]: The Istros [Bulgaria] took the crown of Rome. Take up arms, the arrows of the Moesians broke the spears of the Ausonians.[156]

a page of a medieval manuscript
Above: The Byzantines defeat Samuel at Kleidion, below: the death of Samuel, Manasses Chrinicle

Immediately after the victory Samuel pushed east and recovered north-eastern Bulgaria with the old capitals Pliska and Preslav. In the next ten years the Bulgarian armies expanded the country south annexing the whole of Thessaly and Epirus and plundering the Peloponnese Peninsula.[157] With the major Bulgarian military successes and the defection of a number of Byzantine officials to the Bulgarians, the prospect of the Byzantines losing all their Balkan themes was quite real.[158] Threatened by an alliance between the Byzantines and the Serbian state of Duklja, in 997 Samuel defeated and captured its Prince Jovan Vladimir and took control of the Serb lands.[159] In 997, following the death of Roman, the last heir of the Krum's dynasty, Samuel was proclaimed Emperor of Bulgaria. He established friendly relations with Stephen I of Hungary through a marriage between his son and heir Gavril Radomir and Stephen's daughter but eventually Gavril Radomir expelled his wife and in 1004 Hungary participated with the Byzantine forces against Bulgaria.[160] After 1000 the tides of the war turned in favor of the Byzantines under the personal leadership of Basil II, who launched annual campaigns of methodical conquest of the Bulgarian cities and strongholds that were sometimes carried out in all twelve months of the year instead of the usual short campaigning of the epoch with the troops returning home to winter.[161] In 1001 they seized Pliska and Preslav in the east, in 1003 a major offensive along the Danube resulted in the fall of Vidin after an eight-month siege, and in 1004 Basil II defeated Samuel in the battle of Skopje and took possession of the city.[161] The war attrition dragged on for a decade until 1014, when the Bulgarians were decisively defeated at Kleidion. Some 14,000 Bulgarians were captured; it is said that 99 out of every 100 men were blinded, with the remaining hundredth man left with one eye so as to lead his compatriots home, earning Basil II the moniker "Bulgaroktonos", the Bulgar Killer.[162] When they arrived in Samuel's residence in Prespa, the Bulgarian Emperor suffered a heart attack at the grisly sight and died two days later, on 6 October.[162] Resistance continued for four more years under Ravril Radomir (r. 1014–1015) and Ivan Vladislav (r. 1015–1018) but after the demise of the latter during the siege of Dyrrhachium the nobility surrendered to Basil II and Bulgaria was annexed by the Byzantine Empire.[163] The Bulgarian aristocracy kept its privileges, although many noblemen were transferred to Asia Minor, thus depriving the Bulgarians of their natural leaders.[164] Although the Bulgarian Patriarchate was demoted to an archbishopric it retained its sees and enjoyed a privileged autonomy.[164][165] Despite several major attempts at restoring its independence, Bulgaria remained under Byzantine rule until the brothers Asen and Peter liberated the country in 1185, establishing the Second Bulgarian Empire.[166]


A medieval monarch
Khan Omurtag was the first Bulgarian ruler known to had claimed divine origin, Madrid Skylitzes

The First Bulgarian Empire was a hereditary monarchy. The monarch was responsible for the issues of peace and war. He was the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, a judge and a high priest in the pagan period.[167][168] He guided the external policy of the country and could conclude treaties personally or through authorised emissaries.[168] In the pagan period the title of the ruler was Khan. After 864 Boris I adopted the Slavic Knyaz (Prince), and since 913 the Bulgarian monarchs were recognised as Tsars (Emperors).[169][170] The authority of the Khan was limited by the leading noble families and the People's Council. The People's Council included the nobility and the "armed people" was gathered to discuss issues of crucial importance for the state. A People's Council in 766 dethroned Khan Sabin because he was seeking peace with the Byzantines.[72] According to the old Bulgarian tradition the Khan was first among equals and that was among the reasons for why Boris I decided to convert to Christianity, as the Christian monarch ruled by the grace of God.[104] However, it should be noted that the divinity of the Bulgarian ruler, as well as his superiority over the Byzantine Emperor, were already asserted by Khan Omurtag (r. 814–831),[171] as stated in the Chatalar Inscription:

The Kanasubigi Omurtag is a divine ruler in the land where he was born. ... May God [ Tangra ] grant that the divine ruler may press down the [Byzantine] emperor with his foot so long as the Ticha flows...[172]

The second most important post in Bulgaria after the monarch was the kavhan, monopolised by the members of the tentatively known "Kavhan family".[173] The kavhan had broad powers and commanded the left wing of the army, and at times the whole army.[174] He could be a co-ruler or a regent during the minority of the monarch;[175][176] the sources mention that Khan Malamir "ruled together with kavhan Isbul" (fl. 820s–830s)[173] and kavhan Dometian is noted as an associate [in the government] of Gavril Radomir (r. 1014–1015).[177] The third highest-ranking official was the ichirgu-boila, who commanded the right wing of the army at war and might have had the role of a foreign minister.[175][178] Under his direct command were 1,300 soldiers.[175] Historian Veselin Beshevliev assumes that the post might have been created under the reign of Khan Krum (r. 803–814), or earlier, in order to limit the power of the kavhan.[179] Although initially the Bulgarians did not have their own writing system, the presence of numerous stone inscriptions, mainly in Greek language, indicate the existence of a chancellery to the Khan that was probably organised in Byzantine manner.[180][181] Part of the chancellery's staff might have been Greeks and even monks, despite the fact that the country was still pagan.[180]

Social classes

A symbol
The symbol ıYı is associated with the Dulo clan and the First Empire

According to an inscription dated from the reign of Khan Malamir (r. 831–836) there were three classes in pagan Bulgaria – boilas, bagains and Bulgarians, i.e. the common people.[182] The nobility were initially known as the boila but after the 10th century the word was transformed to bolyar, which was eventually adopted in many countries in Eastern Europe. Each boila clan had its own totem and was believed to had been divinely established, hence their staunch opposition to Christianity, which was seen as a threat to their privileges.[183] Many of the clans had ancient origin that could be traced back to the time when the Bulgars inhabited the steppes to the north and east of the Black Sea.[167] The Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans mentions monarchs of three clans that ruled Bulgaria until 766 – Dulo, Vokil and Ugain.[167] The power of the principal noble families was greatly crippled in the aftermath of the anti-Christian rebellion of 866, when Boris I executed 52 leading boilas along with their families.[184]

The boila were divided into inner and outer boilas and it was among their ranks that the holders of the highest military and administrative posts were selected.[182][185] Most likely the outer boilas resided outside the capital, while the inner ones were member of the court under the direct influence of the monarch.[186] The bagains were the second-ranking aristocratic class and were divided into numerous ranks.[187] The presence of two separate nobility classes is further confirmed in the Responsa Nicolai ad consulta Bulgarorum (Responses of Pope Nicholas I to the Questions of the Bulgarians), where Boris I wrote about primates and mediocres seu minores.[185] Another privileged group were the tarkhans, although from the surviving inscriptions it is impossible to determine whether they belonged to the boilas or to the bagains, or were a separate class.[188] The original Bulgar titles and many of the institutions from the pagan era were preserved after the Christianisation of Bulgaria until the very fall of the First Empire.[189] The beginning of the 9th century was marked with a process of incorporation of both Slavs and Byzantine Greeks in the ranks of the Bulgarian nobility and privileged classes, which increased the power of the monarch that had been previously curtailed by the leading Bulgar aristocratic families.[190][191] Since that time certain Slavic titles became more prominent, such as župan, and some of them mingled forming titles like župan tarkhan.[192]

The peasants lived in rural communities known as zadruga and had collective responsibility.[193] The majority of the peasantry were personally free under the direct rule of the central administration and the legislation introduced following the adoption of Christianity regulated their relations.[193] The number of personally dependent peasants bound to nobility or ecclesiastical estates increased since the 10th century.[194]


Due to the limited remaining sources it is very difficult to reconstruct the administrative evolution and division of the country. Initially the Slavic tribes retained their autonomy but since the beginning of the 9th century commenced a process of centralisation.[181][195] As Bulgaria's territory steadily expanded the measures against the tribal autonomy were deemed necessary in order to achieve more effective control and to prevent separatism.[196] When in the 820s some Slavic tribes in western Bulgaria, the Timochani, Branichevtsi and Abodriti sought overlordship from the Franks, Khan Omurtag replaced their chieftains with his own governors.[196] The country was divided into comitati, governed by a comita, although this term was used by Western European chroniclers, who wrote in Latin. It is likely that the Bulgarians used the term земя (zemya, meaning "land"), as mentioned in the Court Law for the People.[197] Their number is unknown, but the Archbishop of Reims Hincmar mentioned that the 866 rebellion against Boris I was headed by the nobility of the 10 comitati.[197][198][199] They were further divided into župi, that in turn consisted of zadrugi. The comita was appointed by the monarch, and was assisted by a tarkhan. The former had many civil and administrative functions, while the latter was responsible for the military affairs.[200][201] One of the few comitati known by name is Kutmichevitsa in south-western Bulgaria, corresponding to modern western Macedonia, southern Albania and north-western Greece.[200]


The first know written Bulgarian law code was issued by Khan Krum at a People's Council in the very beginning of the 9th century but the text has not survived in its integrity and only certain items have been preserved in the 10th-century Byzantine encyclopedia Suda.[91] It prescribed death penalty for false oaths and false accusations and severe penalties for thieves and those who gave them shelter.[91][202][90] The Suda also mentioned that the laws foresaw the uprooting of all vineyards as a measure against drunkenness but this claim is refuted in the contemporary sources that indicate that after capturing Pliska in 811 the Byzantine Emperor Nicephorus I found large quantities of wine; and after the final Bulgarian victory Krum drank wine in the Emperor's skull.[202][203] Krum's legal code is seen by many historians as an attempt to centralise the state and to end the different element of the society by putting them under a single set of law.[204] However, since the text is not preserved its precise aims remain unknown.[91]

After the conversion to Christianity Boris I was concerned with the legal matters and asked Pope Nicholas I to provide legal texts.[205] Eventually, under his reign was compiled the Законъ соудный людьмъ (Zakon sudnyi ljud'm), or the Court Law for the People, based heavily on the Byzantine Ecloga and Nomocanon, but adapted to the Bulgarian conditions and valid for the whole population of the country.[206][205] It combined element of civil, criminal, canon and military law, as well as public and private law, and included substantive norms and procedural guidelines. The Court Law for the People dealt with combating paganism, testimony of witnesses, sexual morality, marital relations, distribution of war booty, etc.[205] To eradicate the residual paganism the law provided that a village that allowed performance of pagan rituals should be transferred along its whole land to the Church; and should a rich landowner perform them, his lands were to be sold, and the revenue shared among the poor.[193]


A replica of a sabre
A replica of a Bulgarian sabre found near the town of Varbitsa

After the formation of the Bulgarian state the ruling elite harboured deep distrust towards the Byzantines against whose perfidy and sudden attacks they had to maintain constant vigilance.[49] The Byzantine Empire never relinquished its claim over all lands to the south of the Danube and made several attempts to enforce that claim. Throughout the existence of the First Empire Bulgaria could expect Byzantine onslaughts aimed at its destruction.[101] The steppes to the north-east were home to numerous peoples whose unpredictable pillaging raids were also of concern.[207] Therefore, military preparedness was a top priority.[207] All borders of the country were under vigilance. Guards always stood on the alert and if anyone was to flee during a watch, the responsible guards are killed without hesitation.[207] Before battle, a "most faithful and prudent man" was sent to inspect all the arms, horses, and materiel and being ill-prepared or readied in a useless fashion was punishable by death.[207] Capital punishment was also prescribed for riding war horses in peace time.[208]

The Bulgarian army was armed with various types of weapons, the most widely used being sabres, swords, battle axes, spears, pikes, daggers, arkans, bows and arrows.[209] The soldiers were often trained to use both spears and bows.[209] The Bulgarians wore helms, mails and shields for defence. The helms were usually cone-shaped, the shields were round and light. The mails were two types – wedge riveted mails consisting of small metal rings linked together, and scale armour consisting of small armour plates attached to each other.[209] Belts were very important for the early Bulgarians and were often decorated with golden, silver, bronze or copper buckles that manifested the illustrious origin of the holder.[209]

The most important part of the army was the heavy cavalry. In the early 9th century the Bulgarian Khan could muster 30,000 riders "all covered in iron"[210] who were armoured with iron helms and chain-mails.[211] The horses too were covered with armour.[212] As the capital Pliska was situated in an open plain the cavalry was essential for its protection.[213] The fortification system of the inner regions of the country was reinforced with several fortified trenches covering huge spaces and supporting the manoeuvrability of the cavalry.[213]

A medieval manuscript
A battle scene of the Byzantine–Bulgarian war of 894–896, Madrid Skylitzes

The army was well versed in the use of stratagems. A strong cavalry unit was often held in reserve and would attack the enemy at an opportune moment. Free horses would be sometimes concentrated behind the battle formation to avoid surprise attacks from the rear.[214] The Bulgarian army used ambushes and feigned retreats, during which the cavalrymen rode with their backs to the horse, firing clouds of arrows on the enemy. If the enemy pursued disorganized, they would turn back and fiercely attack them.[214] The Bulgarians were able to fight at night – in 917 they defeated the Byzantine in the battle of Katasyrtai after a nocturnal combat.[215][216] The army employed ruse de guerre. In 918 the Bulgarians took the capital of the Byzantine theme Hellas Thebes without bloodshed after sending into the city five men with axes who eliminated the guards, broke the hinges of the gates, and opened them to the main forces.[217][218]

The Bulgarian army was well equipped with siege engines. The Bulgarians employed the services of Byzantine and Arab captives and fugitives to produce siege equipment, such as the engineer Eumathius, who sought refuge to Khan Krum after the capture of Serdica in 809.[212] The 9th century anonymous Byzantine chronicler known as Scrptor incertus lists the contemporary machinery produced and used by the Bulgarians.[219] These included catapults; scorpions; multi-storey siege towers with a battering ram on the bottom floor; testudos – battering rams with metal plating on the top; τρίβόλοι – iron tridents placed hidden amidst the battlefield to hinder the enemy cavalry; ladders, etc.[212] Iron-plated wagons were used for transportation. It is known that Khan Krum prepared 5,000 such wagons for his intended siege of Constantinople in 814.[212] Wooden pontoon bridges were also constructed for crossing rivers.[210][211]

Economy and urbanism

Agriculture was the most important sector of the economy whose development was favoured by the fertile soils of Moesia, Thrace, and partly, Macedonia.[220] The land was divided into "lord's lands" and "village lands".[193] The most widespread cereals were wheat, rye and millet that were the staple food for the populace.[220] Other crops of significance were grapes, orchards, especially after the 9th century, and linen. The latter was used for fabrics and cloths that were exported to the Byzantine Empire.[220] Due to natural calamities, such as droughts or locusts, harvests were not secure and there were occasional hunger years. In response to this problem the state maintained depositories of cereals as a reserve.[221] Animal husbandry was well developed, the main stocks being cattle, oxen, buffalos, sheep, pigs and horses.[221] Animal stocks were vital for farming, transport, military, clothing and food. The importance of the meat for the Bulgarian table was demonstrated in the Responses of Pope Nicholas I to the Questions of the Bulgarians, where seven out of 115 questions concerned meat consumption.[221]

Small-scale mining was developed in the Balkan Mountains, the Rhodope Mountains and some regions of Macedonia.[221] A number of diverse handicrafts thrived in the urban centres and some villages. Preslav had workshops that processed metals (especially gold and silver), stone and wood, and produced ceramics, glass and jewellery.[222][223] The Bulgarians produced tiles with higher qualities than the Byzantines and exported them to the Byzantine Empire and Kievan Rus'.[223] There was large-scale production of bricks in eastern Bulgaria, many of them marked with the symbol "IYI", which is associated with the Bulgarian state, indicating possible state-organised production facilities.[222] Since the destruction of the Avar Khaganete in the beginning of the 9th century Bulgaria controlled the salt mines in Transylvania until they were overran by the Magyars a century earlier.[224] The importance of the salt trade was illustrated during the negotiations for alliance between Bulgaria and East Francia in 892 when the Frankish King Arnulf demanded that Bulgaria discontinue the export of salt to Great Moravia.[225]

A medieval treasure
A pendant of the Preslav treasure

Trade had an important weight in the economy, as Bulgaria lay between the Byzantine Empire, Central Europe, the Rus' and the steppes.[226] Trade relations with the Byzantine Empire was regulated on a most favoured nation basis by treaties that included commercial clauses.[109] The first such treaty was signed in 716 and determined that goods could only be imported or exported when provided with a state seal. Goods without documents were to be confiscated for the state treasury. The Bulgarian merchants had a colony in Constantinople and paid favourable taxes.[109] The relevance of international trade for Bulgaria was evident, as the country was willing to go to war with the Byzantine Empire when in 894 the latter moved the market of the Bulgarian traders from Constantinople to Thessaloniki, where they had to pay larger taxes and did not have direct access to goods from the east.[109] In 896 the war was won and the status of Bulgaria as a most favoured nation restored and commercial restrictions – abolished.[114] Some Bulgarian towns acquired great prosperity, such as Preslavets on the Danube that was described in the 960s as being more prosperous that the capital of the Rus', Kiev.[226] A contemporary chronicle lists the main trade partners and chief imports to Bulgaria. The country imported gold, silks, wine and fruits from the Byzantine Empire, silver and horses from Hungary and Bohemia, furs, honey, wax and slaves from the Rus'.[227] There were commercial ties with Italy and the Middle East as well.[228]

The First Bulgarian Empire did not mint coins and taxes were paid in kind.[229][230] It is not known whether they were based on land or on person, or both. In addition to the taxes the peasantry must have had other obligations, such as building and maintaining infrastructure and defences, as well as to provide food and inventory to the army.[230][231] The Arab writer Al-Masudi noted that instead of money the Bulgarians used cows and sheep to buy goods.[229]

The density of the network of towns was large. The economic historian Paul Bairoch estimated that in 800 Pliska had 30,000 inhabitants and around 950 Preslav had some 60,000 making it the largest city in non-Muslim Europe, save Constantinople.[232] In comparison, the largest cities in contemporary France and Italy did not reach 30,000 and 50,000 respectively.[232] Alongside the two capitals existed other prominent urban centres that made Bulgaria the most urbanised region in Christian Europe at the time along with Italy.[232] According to contemporary chronicles there were 80 towns only in the region of the lower Danube.[233] Surviving sources list more than 100 settlements in the western areas of the Empire where the Bulgarian Orthodox Church possessed properties.[234] The larger urban centres consisted of inner and outer town. The inner town would be encircled with stone walls and had administrative and defence functions, while the outer town, usually unprotected, was the centre of economic activities with markets, workshops, vineyards, gardens and dwelling for the populace.[235] However, it should be noted that as elsewhere in the Early Middle Ages, the country remained predominantly rural.


Pagan Bulgaria

A rosette
The Pliska rosette dated from the pagan period has seven fingers representing the Classical planets

In the first almost two centuries after its creation, the Bulgarian state remained pagan. The Bulgars and the Slavs continued to practice their indigenous religions. The Bulgar religion was monotheistic, linked to the cult to Tangra, the God of the Sky.[236][237] The worship of Tangra is proven by an inscription that reads "Kanasubigi Omurtag, a divine ruler ... performed sacrifice to God Tangra".[238] The ruling Khan had an important place in the religious life; he was the high priest and performed rituals.[167] A large sanctuary dedicated to the cult of Tangra existed near the modern village of Madara.[236] The Bulgars practised shamanism, believed in magic and charms, and performed various rituals.[236] Some of the rituals were described by the Byzantines after the "most Christian" ruler Leo V had to pour out water on the ground from a cup, to personally turn round horse saddles, to touch triple bridle, to lift grass high above the ground and to cut up dogs as witnesses during the ceremony of the signing of the Byzantine–Bulgarian Treaty of 815.[239] The pouring of water was a reminder that if the oath is broken, blood would pour out. In the same sense can be explained the turning of the saddle – a warning that the violator would not be able to ride or would fall dead from his horse during battle. The triple bridle symbolised the toughness of the agreement and the lifting of grass reminded that no grass would remain in the enemy country if the peace was broken. The sacrifice of dogs was a common custom among the Turkic peoples which further strengthened the treaty.[239]

The Slavs worshiped numerous deities. The supreme god was Perun, the god of thunder and lightning.[240] Perun was the only god mentioned (though not by name) by the first authoritative reference to the Slavic mythology in written history, the 6th century Byzantine historian Procopius, who described the Slavs that settled south of the Danube. Procopius noted that they also worshipped rivers and believed in nymphs.[240] A number of mythological being from the Slavic pantheon persisted in Bulgarian folklore to present, such as samodivas, halas, vilas, rusalkas, slavic dragons, etc. During sacrifices the Slavs would perform divinations. After the adoption of Christianity the worship of Perun merged with the cult to Saint Elijah.[240]

a page of a medieval manuscript
Bulgarian soldiers kill Christians during the persecutions, Menologion of Basil II

Christianity was practised in Bulgaria throughout the whole pagan period. Its dissemination among the populace increased as a result of the successful wars of Khan Krum in the beginning of the 9th century.[241] Krum employed many Byzantine Christians – Greeks, Armenians and Slavs – in his military and administration; some of them served as deputies of the kavhan and the ichirgu-boila.[242] Tens of thousands Byzantines were resettled across Bulgaria, mainly beyond the Danube River to protect the north-eastern borders, so that they could face non-Byzantines.[243] Many of them, however, maintained clandestine links with the Byzantine court which fuelled the traditional distrust of the Bulgarian elite and resulted in a large-scale persecution of Christianity under the Khans Omurtag and Malamir. Omurtag and the nobility saw the Christians as Byzantine agents and felt that this religion, with its hierarchy based in Byzantium, was a threat to Bulgarian independence.[183] There were some executions, including two of the five strategoi who served under Krum, Leo and John, the metropolitan of Adrianople, the bishop of Debeltos, etc.[183][244] The list of the martyred Christians included Bulgar (Asfer, Kuberg) and Slav names.[244] The dismissive attitude of the Christians towards the pagans was insulting to the Bulgarian elite. In a conversation with a Byzantine Christian Omurtag told him: "Do not humiliate our gods, for their power is great. As a proof, we who worship them, have conquered the whole Roman state".[245] Yet, despite all measures, Christianity continued to spread,[183] reaching the members of the Khan's own family. Omurtag's eldest son Enravota, seen as pro-Christian, was disinherited and eventually converted to Christianity. After refusing to renounce his faith, he was executed by orders of his brother Malamir c. 833 and became the first Bulgarian saint.[246] The attitude of the Bulgarian rulers to Christianity is seen in the Philippi Inscription of Khan Presian:

...If someone seeks the truth, God watches. And if one lies, God watches. The Bulgarians did many good things to the Christians [the Byzantines] and the Christians forgot, but God watches.[247]


By 863 Presian's successor Khan Boris I had decided to accept Christianity.[248] The sources do not mention the reasons behind this decision but there were several political rationales that he had considered. As Christianity was spreading further into Europe in the 9th century the pagan countries found themselves encircled by Christian powers which could use religion as an acceptable excuse for aggression.[101] Conversion on the other hand would establish the country as an equal international partner.[101] There is evidence that Bulgaria did have contacts with the Muslim world as well – either directly or through Volga Bulgaria that had adopted Islam at about the same time – but the country was far away from any Muslim country that could be of any political benefit, and large part of the population had already been Christian.[249] Furthermore, the Christian doctrine would cement the monarch's position high above the nobility as an autocrat, being ruler "by the grace of God" and God's representative on Earth.[250][251] Moreover, Christianity presented excellent opportunity to firmly consolidate both Bulgars and Slavs in a single Bulgarian people under common religion.[251]

A painting depicting baptism
Baptism of Boris I and his court, painting by Nikolai Pavlovich

In 863 Boris I sought a mission from East Francia rather than from the Byzantine Empire. He had an alliance with the Eastern Franks since 860 and was aware that the larger distance between the two countries was an obstacle for them to yield direct influence on the future Bulgarian Church.[251] He was fully aware that as a neighbour Byzantium would try to interfere with Bulgarian matters.[251] Indeed, the Byzantine Empire was determined to place the Bulgarian Church under the jurisdiction of Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople because it hoped it could serve as a leverage to influence the Bulgarian policies, and furthermore could not allow Bulgaria to become a military tool of the Papacy that could potentially be employed by the Pope to enforce his wishes on the Empire.[252] Upon learning about Boris I's intentions the Byzantine Emperor Michael III invaded Bulgaria. At the time the Bulgarian army was engaged in warfare against Great Moravia to the north-east and Boris I agreed to negotiate.[237][251] The Byzantines' only demand was Boris I to adopt Christianity from Constantinople and to accept Byzantine clergy to evangelise the population.[251] Boris I conceded and was baptised in 864 taking the name of his godfather, Emperor Michael.[237][253]

The highest posts in the newly established Bulgarian Church were held by Byzantines who preached in Greek language. Aware of the dangers that the spiritual dependency on the Byzantine Empire could pose for Bulgaria's independence, Boris I was determined to ensure the autonomy of the Bulgarian Church under a Patriarch.[184] Since the Byzantines were reluctant to grant any concessions Boris I took advantage on the ongoing rivalry between the Patriarchate of Constantinople and the Papacy in Rome in order to prevent either of them from exerting influence in his lands through religion.[184][102] In 866 he sent a delegation to Rome under the high-ranking official Peter declaring his desire to accept Christianity in accordance with the Western rites along with 115 questions to Pope Nicholas I. The Pope's detailed answers to Boris I's questions were delivered by two bishops heading a mission to facilitate the conversion of the Bulgarian people.[254] However, neither Nicolas I nor his successor Adrian II agreed to recognize an autonomous Bulgarian Church, which cooled the relations between the two sides.[255] Bulgaria's shift towards Rome on the other hand, made the Byzantines much more conciliatory. In 870, at the Fourth Council of Constantinople, the Bulgarian Church was recognized as an autocephalous Eastern Orthodox Church under the supreme direction of the Patriarch of Constantinople.[256][257]

The adoption of Christianity was met with opposition by large layers of the nobility. In 866 Boris I faced a major rebellion of the boila from all parts of the country. The insurgency was crushed and 52 leading boilas were executed along with their whole kin.[104][258] After Boris I abdicated in 889 his successor and eldest son Vladimir (r. 889–893) attempted to restore paganism but his father took arms against him and had him deposed and blinded.[104]

Bulgarian Orthodox Church

A medieval icon
A medieval icon of Saint Clement of Ohrid, a high-ranking official of the Bulgarian Church, scholar, writer and enlightener of the Bulgarians and the Slavs

Since 870 the Bulgarian Church was autonomous under an archbishop.[257] The decree of autonomy under the nominal ecclesiastical jurisdiction of Constantinople was far greater than could possibly had been achieved under the Papacy.[256] Following the Fourth Council of Constantinople the Byzantine clergy was once again admitted to Bulgaria and allowed to preach in Greek.[256] However, as a result of the Council of Preslav in 893 Old Bulgarian was declared the official language of the state and the Church and the Greek-speaking Byzantine priests had to leave the country. Thus, the church was entirely staffed by Bulgarians.[259]

Boris I's successor Simeon I was not content to have the Bulgarian Church with the rank of archbishopric and was determined to raise it to a patriarchate, in light of his own ambition to become an emperor. He was well acquainted with the Byzantine imperial tradition that the autocrat must have a patriarch and there could be no empire without a patriarchate.[260] In the aftermath of his remarkable triumph over the Byzantines in the battle of Achelous, in 918 he convened a council and elevated the archbishop Leontius as a patriarch.[260] The decisions of that council were not recognized by the Byzantines[261] but as a result of the Bulgarian victory in the war they eventually recognized Leontius' successor Demetrius as Patriarch of Bulgaria in 927.[262] It was the first Patriarchate officially accepted, apart from the ancient Pentarchy. It is likely that the seat of the Patriarchate was in the city of Drastar on the Danube River rather than in the capital Preslav.[263] In the late 10th century the Bulgarian Patriarchate included the following dioceses: Ohrid, Kostur, Glavinitsa (in modern southern Albania), Maglen, Pelagonia, Strumitsa, Morovizd (in modern northern Greece), Velbazhd, Serdica, Braničevo, Niš, Belgrade, Srem, Skopje, Prizren, Lipljan, Servia, Drastar, Voden, Ras, Chernik, Himara, Drinopol, Butrint, Yanina, Petra and Stag.[234][264]

After the fall of the eastern parts of the empire under Byzantine occupation in 971 the seat of the Patriarchate was relocated to Ohrid in the west.[153][265] With the final conquest of Bulgaria in 1018 the Patriarchate was demoted to an archbishopric but retained many privileges. It kept control of all existing episcopal sees, the seat remained in Ohrid and its titular, the Bulgarian John of Debar, kept his office. Furthermore, the Bulgarian archbishopric was given a special position – it was placed directly under the emperor rather than under the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople.[164][165]

Monasticism grew steadily and the monasteries quickly became major landowners with large population of peasants living their estates.[266] It developed further under the reign of Emperor Peter I, accompanied with augmentation of their properties.[226] Many high-ranking nobles and members of the ruling family tonsured and died as monks, including Boris I, his brother Doks, Peter I, the ichirgu-boila Mostich, etc.[267] The growing opulence of monastic life led to an increase of asceticism among more pious monks. One of them, John of Rila, became a hermit in the Rila Mountains and his virtues soon attracted a number of followers,[226] who founded the renowned Rila Monastery after his death. He preached about living in harmony and stressed the value of manual labour and the need the monks never to aspire to riches and power.[226][268] John of Rila was revered as a saint while he was still alive and eventually became patron of the Bulgarian people.

In the 10th century Bulgarian clerics established connections with the emerging Christian communities in the Rus'.[269] Bulgaria seems to had been an established centre from where the small number of Russian Christians obtained clergy and liturgical texts.[151] As a result of the Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria many of his soldiers were influenced by Christianity and maintained that interest after their return. The connections between Bulgarians and Russians must be considered an important background to the official conversion to Christianity of Kievan Rus' in 988.[151]


A map of the Bogomilist expansion in Europe
Expansion of Bogomilism in medieval Europe

During the reign of Emperor Peter I (r. 927–969) in Bulgaria arose a heretical movement known as Bogomilism. The heresy was named after its founder the priest Bogomil whose name can be translated as dear (mil) to God (Bog). The main sources about Bogomilism in Bulgaria come from a letter of the Ecumenical Patriarch Theophylact of Constantinople to Peter I (c. 940), a treatise by Cosmas the Priest (c. 970) and the anti-Bogomil council of Emperor Boril of Bulgaria (1211).[270] Bogomilism was a neo-Gnostic and dualist sect that believed that God had two sons, Jesus Christ and Satan, that represented the two principles good and evil.[271] God had created light and the invisible world, while Satan rebelled and created darkness, the material world and man.[271][272] Therefore, they rejected marriage, reproduction, the Church, the Old Testament, the Cross, etc.[273] The Bogomils were divided into several categories, led by the perfecti (the perfect ones) that never married, consumed no meat and wine and preached the gospel. Women too could become perfecti.[274] The other two categories were the believers, who had to adopt and follow most of the Bogomil moral ethics, and the listeners, who were not required to change their lifestyle.[275] The Bogomils were described by Cosmas as looking docile, modest and silent from the outside, but being hypocrites and ravenous wolves in the inside.[272][273] The Bulgarian Orthodox Church condemned the teachings of Bogomilism and members of the sect were persecuted by the state authorities as well since the Bogomils preached civil disobedience because as anything earthly the state was considered to be linked with Satan.[272] The sect could not be eradicated and from Bulgaria it eventually spread to the rest of the Balkans, the Byzantine Empire, southern France and northern Italy. In certain regions of Western Europe the heresy flourished under different names – Cathars, Albigensians, Patarins – until the 14th century.[271][272]

Formation of Bulgarian nationality

The Bulgarian state existed before the formation of the Bulgarian people.[205] Prior to the establishment of the Bulgarian state the Slavs had mingled with the native Thracian population.[276] The population and the density of the settlements increased after 681 and the differences between the individual Slavic tribes gradually disappeared as communications became regular between the regions of the country.[277] By the second half of the 9th century, Bulgars and Slavs had lived together for almost two centuries and the more numerous Slavs were on the way to assimilate the Bulgars.[278][279] Many Bulgars had already started to use the Slavic Old Bulgarian language while the Turkic Bulgar language gradually died out leaving only certain words and terms.[280][281][59] The Christianization of Bulgaria and the establishment of Old Bulgarian as a language of the state and the Church under Boris I further accelerated that process and were the main means to bind together Bulgars and Slavs and to make the Slavs of Macedonia and the other reaches of the country into Bulgarians.[103][282] The new religion dealt a crushing blow on the privileges of the old Bulgar aristocracy and furthermore by that time many Bulgars were presumably speaking Slavic.[279] Boris I made it a national policy to use the doctrine of Christianity, that had neither Slavic or Bulgar origin, to bind them together in a single culture.[283] As a result, by the end of the 9th century the Bulgarians had become a single Slavic nationality with ethnic awareness that was to survive in triumph and tragedy to present.[205]


The cultural heritage of the First Bulgarian Empire is usually defined in Bulgarian historiography as the Pliska-Preslav culture, named after the first two capitals, Pliska and Preslav, where most of the surviving monuments are concentrated. Many monuments of that period have been found around Madara, Shumen, Novi Pazar, the village of Han Krum in north-eastern Bulgaria, as well in the territory of modern Romania, where Romanian archaeologists called it the "Dridu culture".[284] Remains left by the First Empire have also been discovered in southern Bessarabia, now divided between Ukraine and Moldova, as well as in modern Republic of Macedonia, Albania and Greece.[143][285] A treatise of the 10th-century Bulgarian cleric and writer Cosmas the Priest describes a wealthy, book-owning and monastery-building Bulgarian elite, and the preserved material evidence suggests a prosperous and settled picture of Bulgaria.[141][143]


Civil architecture

The first capital Pliska initially resembled a huge encampment spanning an area of 23 km2 with the eastern and western sides measuring some 7 km in length, the northern – 3.9 km, and the southern – 2.7 km. The whole area was encircled by a trench 3.5 m wide in the foundation and 12 m wide in the upper part and earthen escarpment with similar proportions – 12 m wide in the foundation and 3.5 m in the upper past.[286] The inner town measured 740 m to the north and to the south, 788 m to the west, and 612 m to the east. It was protected by stone walls 10 m high and 2.6 m thick, constructed by large carved blocks.[286] There were four gates, each protected by two pairs of quadrangular towers. The corners were protected by cylindrical towers and there were pentagonal towers between each corner and gate tower.[286] The inner town harboured the Khan's palace, temples, and nobility houses. The palace complex included baths, a pool and a heating system.[287] There were several inns, as well as numerous shops and workshops.[288]

Medieval ruins
The ruins of Pliska, the first capital of Bulgaria

The Bulgarians also constructed forts with residences, called by the contemporary Byzantine authors auls, or fortified palaces.[288] An example of this type of construction is the Aul of Omurtag, mentioned in the Chatalar Inscription, which bears many similarities with Pliska, such as the presence of baths and the usage of monumental construction techniques with large carved limestone blocks.[289] The archaeologists have discovered a damaged lion statue that was originally 1 m in height and matches the description in the inscription: "In the field of Pliska staying he [Omurtag] made a court/camp (aulis) at [the river] Ticha ... and skillfully erected a bridge at Ticha together with the camp [he put] four columns and above the columns he erected two lions."[289] The same method of construction was employed in the fortress on the Danubian island of Păcuiul lui Soare (in modern Romania), where the gate is similar in plan with those at Pliska, Preslav and the Aul of Omurtag.[289] Further north on the southern slopes of the Carpathian Mountains was located the fortress Slon, which was an important juncture that connected the salt mines of Transylvania with the lands to the south of the Danube, and was constructed in the same manner.[284]

The second capital Preslav covered an area of 5 km2 in the shape of irregular pentagon and like Pliska was divided into inner and outer town.[290] The city experienced an extensive construction programme under Simeon I who intended it to rival Constantinople. The inner town contained two palaces, called by the archaeologists the Western Palace and the Throne Hall that were linked.[290] Very few elements of the decoration have survived –  marble plates and two monolith columns of green marble that probably enclosed the arch above the throne.[291] The whole complex was larger than the Pliska Palace and was walled with the bath adjoining the southern wall.[292] A ceremonial road covered with stone plates linked the northern gate and the palace complex and formed a spacious plaza in front of it.[293] The outer town housed estates, churches, monasteries, workshops and dwellings.[292] Adjoined to the outer side of southern gates of the inner town there was a large trading edifice with 18 rooms for commerce on the first floor and accommodation rooms on the second.[228] The most common plan of the commercial, artesian and residential monastic edifices was rectangular with the first floor being used for production, and the second one –  for living. Some of the buildings had marble or ceramic tile floors, and others had verandas on the second floor.[228] There were two types of plumbing – made of masonry or of clay pipes that brought water from the mountains to the city.[293]

Sacral architecture

A medieval church
A medieval church
Above: Church of St. Sophia, Ohrid Below: Church of Our Lady, Kostur

After the adoption of Christianity in 864, intensive construction of churches and monasteries began throughout the Empire. Many of them were erected over the old pagan temples.[294] The new sacral architecture altered the appearance of the cities and fortresses.[295] This construction was sponsored by the state but also by donations by rich people, known as ktitors.[295] Among the first places of worship to be constructed after 864 was the Great Basilica of Pliska. It was one of the biggest structures of the time, as well as contemporary Europe's longest church, with rectangular shape reaching 99 m in length.[296][297] The basilica was divided into two almost equal parts – a spacious atrium and the main building.[296]

During the reign of Simeon I the domed cruciform type of church building was introduced and same to dominate the country's sacral architecture.[293] Preslav was adorned with tens of churches and at least eight monasteries. The churches were decorated with ceramics, plastic elements and a variety of decorative forms.[298] The leading example of the city's ecclesiastic architecture is the splendid Round Church. It was a domed rotunda with a two-tiered colonnade in the interior and a walled atrium with niches and columns.[299][300] The style of the church had been influenced by Armenian, Byzantine and Carolingian architecture.[300] There were also a number of cave monasteries, such as the Murfatlar Cave Complex, where excavations have revealed stone relief murals and inscriptions in three alphabets – Glagolitic, Cyrillic and Greek, as well as Bulgar runes.[301]

In the region of Kutmichevitsa to the south-west, Clement of Ohrid oversaw the construction of the Monastery of Saint Panteleimon and two churches with "round and spherical form" in the late 9th century.[302] In 900 the Monastery of Saint Naum was established at the expense of "the pious Bulgarian Tsar Michael-Boris and his son Tsar Simeon" on the shores of Lake Ohrid at some 30 km to the south of the town as a major literary centre.[295] Other important buildings were the Church of Saint Sophia in Ohrid the Basilica of Saint Achillius on and island in Lake Prespa with dimensions of 30 х 50 m, both modelled after the Great Basilica of Pliska.[303] These churches had three naves and three apses.[296] Preserved edifices from that period that provide evidence of the rich and settled Bulgarian culture at the time include three small churches dated from the late 9th or early 10th centuries in Kostur and the church in the village of German (both in modern Greece).[143]


The most representative surviving art monument is the Madara Rider, a large relief carving commissioned by Khan Tervel following his triumph in 705. It is the only relief of its kind, having no parallel in Europe.[304] The relief depicts a composition of a horseman, a lion and a dog at 23 m above ground level in an almost vertical 100 m high cliff of the Madara Plateau.[305] All figures are in motion. The rider, facing right, is thrusting a spear into the lion lying at his horse's feet, and on the left the dog is running after the horseman.[305] The carving of the horseman halo, garments, as well the bird in front of the horseman face, are barely recognizable due to the erosion and bad condition of the monument.[305] The Madara Rider was included in the UNESCO World Heritage List in 1979.[304]

The meaning and symbolism of the depiction is uncertain, as well its actual masonry tradition and cultural source.[306] The origin of the relief is connected with the Bulgar ethnogenesis – the semi-nomadic equestrian warrior culture from the Eurasian Steppe.[307][308] The Madara Rider bears resemblance to the Persian Sasanian rock relief tradition.[309][306][310] The hero-horseman is also a common character of Turko-Altaic and Alanic mythology.[306] It is sometimes considered that the horseman represents or is related to the Bulgar deity Tangra, while Russian philologist Vladimir Toporov related it to the Iranian deity Mithra.[306] Some considered it an example of the Thracian horseman – a recurring motif of a deity in the form of a horseman in the Paleo-Balkanic mythology.[311]

Sculpture and stone carving were well-developed to supply the demand for public and sacral buildings. Many details of marble carving have been excavated in Preslav. The decoration included animals such as griffins, rabbits and birds, as well as vegetative elements (most often palmettes and grape leaves) and geometric motifs.[312] There were also three-dimensional animal figures discovered in church No. 1 in Preslav, including heads of lions and lionesses.[313]


A tile icon
A medieval fresco
Left: Ceramic icon of Saint Theodore, Preslav ceramics, c. 900. Right: A 10th century fresco in the Church of St. George, Sofia

The main sources for Bulgarian domestic use-oriented pottery are the necropoleis at Novi Pazar, Devnya, and Varna.[305] The vessels were made with a potter's wheel, unlike Slavic practice. Since the 9th century two-story ovens were used for the annealing of the pottery.[305] The shape and decoration of the early Bulgarian pottery was similar to that found in northern Caucasus, the Crimea, and the shores of the Sea of Azov. The growing exchange with the Byzantine Empire following the adoption of Christianity led to an increase in the shapes and decorations of the Bulgarian pottery that was unprecedented in the Slavic world.[305]

One of the most famous features of the Pliska-Preslav culture was the decoration of palaces and churches with lacquered ceramic plates, which may indicate a Near Eastern (Arabic) influence.[300] They were produced of white clay, known also as kaolin.[298] In the 10th century the ceramic workshops in and around Preslav produced high quality ceramic tiles in the so-called "Preslav style" that were widely used in monumental construction projects and were also exported abroad.[223] Many of them were marked with Cyrillic or Glagolitic letters on the rear side.[305] Archaeologists have discovered tile of that style in Kiev, showing Bulgarian influences in Russia.[151] The ceramic plates were painted mostly to include geometric or vegetative elements and sometimes birds. Some had depictions of the Virgin, saints and apostles, both in full figures, portraits and medallions.[314] Due to the destruction of Pliska and Preslav, only fragments and details of the ceramic decoration have survived. Among the most notable of those is the well-preserved, 20-tile Icon of St Theodore, found in the ruins of the Patleina Monastery of Saint Panteleimon in the outskirts of Preslav which was the site of one of the workshops.[300][305] The extensive use of ceramic decoration in Preslav and the nearby churches and monasteries most probably pre-dates its widespread use in Constantinople.[300]


Creation of the Slavic writing system

Although the Boris I had succeeded in securing an autonomous Church, the higher clergy and theological books were still Greek, which impeded the efforts to convert the populace to the new religion. Between 860 and 863 the Byzantine monks Saints Cyril and Methodius created the Glagolitic alphabet, the first Slavic alphabet by order of the Byzantine Emperor, who aimed to convert Great Moravia to Orthodox Christianity.[257][315] The language they used was called by later historians Old Church Slavonic and was based on the local Slavic dialect spoken in the region of Thessaloniki,[315] hence it is also known as Old Bulgarian. Ultimately, the brothers' mission to establish Slavic liturgy in Great Moravia failed.[316] In 886 their disciples Clement, Naum and Angelarius, who had been banished from Great Moravia, reached Bulgaria and received a warm welcome by Boris I.[103] They began to preach in Bulgaria and thus the work of the Slavic mission of Cyril and Methodius was saved.[103]

The Bulgarian monarch commissioned the creation of two theological academies to be headed by the disciples where the future Bulgarian clergy was to be instructed in Bulgarian vernacular. Clement was sent to the southwestern province Kutmichevitsa in Macedonia, where he founded the Ohrid Literary School. There, he educated 3,500 pupils between 886 and 907.[279][317] Naum established the literary school in the capital Pliska, which moved later to the new capital Preslav. Eventually, Naum too was sent to Ohrid.[279] The rationale to centre the literary activities far away from the capital was that at the time a Byzantine archbishop still resided in Pliska.[279] In the late 9th or the early 10th century the Cyrillic script was created at the Preslav Literary School.[318] It was based on the Greek letters and included a number of original ones for sounds that were non-existent in Greek, adding 14 letters to the existing 24 Greek ones.[319] In the next few decades the new script replaced the Glagolitic alphabet in Bulgaria and eventually spread in the whole Eastern Orthodox Slavic world.[318] Today more than 250 million people in Eurasia use it as the official alphabet for their national languages.

Literary activities

A map of the distribution of the Cyrillic script
Distribution of the Cyrillic script worldwide

The development of Old Church Slavonic literacy had the effect of preventing the assimilation of the South Slavs into neighbouring cultures, while stimulating the formation of the distinct Bulgarian identity.[320] Initially translation from Byzantine Greek of texts on theology, history and geography was a priority.[321] Literary activities flourished during the reign of Simeon I who had personal interest in literature.[322][316] He gathered many scholars in the court who translated an enormous number of books from Greek and wrote many new works. Among the most prominent figures were Constantine of Preslav, John the Exarch and Chernorizets Hrabar, who is believed by some historians to had been Simeon I himself. They wrote hagiographies, panegyrics, acolouthia, poetry, liturgical hymns, treatises on church music, etc.[321]

A page of a medieval manuscript
A page with the Alphabet Prayer by Constantine of Preslav

One of the first original works was On the Letters (О писмєньхъ) by Chernorizets Hrabar, where he defended the Cyrillic alphabet against its Byzantine Greek critics and proved not only its right to existence but also its superiority to the Greek alphabet arguing that the Greek letters were neither the oldest known to man, nor divine.[323] In the form of rhetoric questions and answers On the Letters demonstrated excellent historic and linguistic knowledge of Chernorizets Hrabar, as he indicated that "God did not first create the Hebrew or the Greek language, but Syrian which Adam spoke..."[324] and underlined that "Before then the Greeks had no alphabet of their own but wrote their speech with Phoenician letters."[324] Constantine of Preslav and John the Exarch combined translated and adapted Byzantine works with original texts.[321] The latter compiled the Shestodnev (ШестодневHexameron) that included valuable first-hand evidence about the Bulgarian Empire under Simeon I. Constantine of Preslav's Didactic Gospel was the first systematic work treating sermons in Slavic literature that also featured the poetic preface Azbuchna molitva (Азбучна молитва – Alphabet Prayer), the first original poetry in Bulgarian language. Later, Cosmas the Priest wrote the anti-Bogomil treatise Sermon Against the Heretics which apart from the theological arguments contained criticism on the contemporary Bulgarian society, with particular attention to religious and social issues.[325]

Apart from the official literature, apocryphical texts were also written and received impetus after the second half of the 10th century, as imperial patronage ceased during the Byzantine conquest and subsequent Byzantine rule in Bulgaria.[321] One such work expressing the Bulgarian aspirations and fears was Tale of the Cross Tree by Jeremiah the Priest that was considered heretical and was banned by the Orthodox Church.[321]

The flourishing literary activity and the experimentation with various genres developed the style, flexibility and expressiveness of the language.[321] The literature produced in the Old Bulgarian language soon spread north and became the lingua franca of the Balkans and Eastern Europe.[326][327] Bulgarian scholars and works influenced most of the Slavic world, including Kievan Rus', medieval Serbia, and medieval Croatia, as well as the non-Slavic medieval Wallachia and Moldavia.[328][329] This thriving activity came to an abrupt end with the Byzantine conquest of Bulgaria. In the following 150 years the Byzantines systematically destroyed all texts in Old Bulgarian language.[330] None of the works of the First Empire have survived in original within its territory and those that have survived are later copies reproduced abroad, mainly in Russia.[330]

See also


  1. ^ Boris I abdicated in 889 and retired to a monastery. After deposing Vladimir he returned to his monastery, where he died in 907.
  2. ^ Boris II died childless and Roman was castrated by the Byzantines to ensure the end of the Krum's dynasty. Thus, there was no threat for Samuel to establish his own dynasty.[331]
  3. ^ The author envisions the soldier-emperor Nikephoros II Phokas (r. 963–969), whom he greatly admired.[156]


  1. ^ Sedlar, Jean W. (2011). East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000–1500. University of Washington Press. p. 424. ISBN 9780295800646. 
  2. ^ Fletcher, Richard A. (1999). The Barbarian Conversion: from Paganism to Christianity. University of California Press. p. 338. ISBN 0-520-21859-0. 
  3. ^ Adrados, Francisco Rodríguez (2005). A History of the Greek Language: from its Origins to the Present. BRILL. p. 265. ISBN 90-04-12835-2. 
  4. ^ Curta 2008, pp. 350–351
  5. ^ "Atlas of Europe in the Middle Ages", Ostrovski, Rome, 1998, page 64
  6. ^ "Atlas of Europe in the Middle Ages", Ostrovski, Rome, 1998, page 66
  7. ^ "Atlas of Europe in the Middle Ages", Ostrovski, Rome, 1998, page 69
  8. ^ Runciman 1930, p. 27
  9. ^ Vladimirov, G. (2005). Danube Bulgaria and Volga Bulgaria. Orbel. 
  10. ^ Fine, John V. A. (1987). The Late Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Late Twelfth Century to the Ottoman Conquest. University of Michigan Press. p. 55. ISBN 0-472-10079-3. 
  11. ^ Crampton, R. J. (2005). A Concise History of Bulgaria. Cambridge University Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-0521616379. 
  12. ^ Crampton, R. J. (2007). Bulgaria. Oxford University Press. p. 14. ISBN 0-19-820514-7. 
  13. ^ Sinor, Denis (1990). The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia. Cambridge University Press. p. 62. ISBN 978-0-521-24304-9. 
  14. ^ Beckwith, Christopher I. (2009). Empires of the Silk Road: a History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age. Princeton University Press. p. 117. ISBN 978-0-691-13589-2. 
  15. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 272
  16. ^ a b c d e f g Whittow 1996, p. 279
  17. ^ Stephenson 2004, p. 18
  18. ^ Webber, Cristopher; Angus McBride (2001). The Thracians, 700 BC–AD 46. Osprey Publishing. p. 14. ISBN 1-84176-329-2. 
  19. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 12–13
  20. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 13–14
  21. ^ Fine 1991, p. 19
  22. ^ Fine 1991, p. 23
  23. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 25
  24. ^ a b c New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 1 2005, p. 134
  25. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 35
  26. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 28–29
  27. ^ Fine 1991, p. 29
  28. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 30
  29. ^ New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 1 2005, p. 138
  30. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 33–34
  31. ^ Fine 1991, p. 36
  32. ^ New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, p. 229: "The exact ethnic origins of the Danubian Bulgars is controversial. It is in any case most probable that they had enveloped groupings of diverse origins during their migration westwards across the Eurasian steppes, and they undoubtedly spoke a form of Turkic as their main language. The Bulgars long retained many of the customs, military tactics, titles and emblems of a nomadic people of the steppes."
  33. ^ "Bulgaria: Arrival of the Bulgars". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Retrieved 26 January 2017. The name Bulgaria comes from the Bulgars, a people who are still a matter of academic dispute with respect to their origin (Turkic or Indo-European) as well as to their influence on the ethnic mixture and the language of present-day Bulgaria. 
  34. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 43–44
  35. ^ Sophoulis, Panos (2011). Byzantium and Bulgaria, 775–831. Brill. p. 89. ISBN 9789004206960. 
  36. ^ Golden 1992, p. 102
  37. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 61
  38. ^ Golden 1992, p. 101
  39. ^ Fine 1991, p. 43
  40. ^ Golden 1992, p. 100
  41. ^ a b c Fine 1991, p. 44
  42. ^ Golden 1992, pp. 244–245
  43. ^ Curta 2008, p. 351
  44. ^ Golden 1992, pp. 245–246
  45. ^ Golden 1992, p. 245
  46. ^ a b Whittow 1996, p. 270
  47. ^ a b c d Fine 1991, p. 67
  48. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 88
  49. ^ a b c New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, p. 229
  50. ^ Whittow 1996, pp. 270–271
  51. ^ a b Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 92
  52. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 271
  53. ^ "Chronica by Sigebert of Gembloux" in LIBI, vol. III, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, p. 42
  54. ^ "Chronographia by Theophanes the Confessor" in GIBI, vol. III, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, p. 264
  55. ^ a b c Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 91
  56. ^ Zlatarski 1970, p. 198
  57. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 67, 69
  58. ^ Fine 1991, p. 69
  59. ^ a b c Fine 1991, p. 68
  60. ^ Zlatarski 1970, p. 188
  61. ^ Runciman 1930, p. 28
  62. ^ Andreev & Lalkov 1999, p. 19
  63. ^ a b c Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1996, p. 98
  64. ^ a b c New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, p. 231
  65. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1996, pp. 107–108
  66. ^ a b c d e Fine 1991, p. 75
  67. ^ "Chronographia by Theophanes the Confessor" in GIBI, vol. III, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, p. 269
  68. ^ "Chronica by Sigebert of Gembloux" in LIBI, vol. III, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, p. 43
  69. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 75–76
  70. ^ Fine 1991, p. 76
  71. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 274
  72. ^ a b c d New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, p. 233
  73. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 116
  74. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, pp. 119–120
  75. ^ Fine 1991, p. 77
  76. ^ a b c Fine 1991, p. 78
  77. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 275
  78. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, pp. 122–123
  79. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 124
  80. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 95
  81. ^ New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, p. 234
  82. ^ a b New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, p. 235
  83. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, pp. 127–128
  84. ^ Fine 1991, p. 97
  85. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 276
  86. ^ Fine 1991, p. 98
  87. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 99
  88. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 277
  89. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 138
  90. ^ a b Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, pp. 140–141
  91. ^ a b c d Fine 1991, p. 100
  92. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 145
  93. ^ New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, p. 236
  94. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 153
  95. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 107
  96. ^ Angelov et all 1981, p. 150
  97. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, pp. 153–154
  98. ^ Curta 2006, p. XV
  99. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 112
  100. ^ New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, pp. 238–239
  101. ^ a b c d e Whittow 1996, p. 280
  102. ^ a b Whittow 1996, p. 283
  103. ^ a b c d Fine 1991, p. 127
  104. ^ a b c d Fine 1991, p. 119
  105. ^ Fine 1991, p. 130
  106. ^ Stephenson 2004, p. 318
  107. ^ Andreev & Lalkov 1996, p. 92
  108. ^ Bakalov et al 2003, p. 251
  109. ^ a b c d Fine 1991, p. 137
  110. ^ Runciman 1930, p. 144
  111. ^ Zlatarski 1972, p. 286
  112. ^ Andreev & Lalkov 1996, p. 93
  113. ^ Whittow 1996, pp. 286–287
  114. ^ a b c Fine 1991, p. 139
  115. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 248
  116. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 287
  117. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 139–140
  118. ^ Zlatarski 1972, pp. 318–321
  119. ^ Fine 1991, p. 140
  120. ^ Fine 1991, p. 143
  121. ^ Fine 1991, p. 144
  122. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 288
  123. ^ Fine 1991, p. 149
  124. ^ "Chronographia by Theophanes Continuatus" in GIBI, vol. V, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, pp. 128129
  125. ^ "Historia by Leo the Deacon" in GIBI, vol. V, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, p. 258
  126. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 289
  127. ^ Andreev & Lalkov 1999, p. 100
  128. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 259
  129. ^ Fine 1991, p. 154
  130. ^ Stephenson 2004, p. 27
  131. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 292
  132. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 260
  133. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 290
  134. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 152–153
  135. ^ Fine 1991, p. 157
  136. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 370
  137. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 161
  138. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 292
  139. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 274
  140. ^ Fine 1991, p. 162
  141. ^ a b Stephenson 2004, p. 25
  142. ^ Whittow 1996, pp. 292–293
  143. ^ a b c d Whittow 1996, p. 293
  144. ^ Fine 1991, p. 177
  145. ^ Fine 1991, p. 181
  146. ^ a b Fine 1991, pp. 182–183
  147. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 184–185
  148. ^ Fine 1991, p. 186
  149. ^ Whittow 1996, pp. 295–296
  150. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 296
  151. ^ a b c d Fine 1991, p. 187
  152. ^ Whittow 1996, pp. 296–297
  153. ^ a b c d Whittow 1996, p. 297
  154. ^ Fine 1991, p. 192
  155. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 369
  156. ^ a b "Poems by John Geometres" in GIBI, vol. V, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, p. 320
  157. ^ Fine 1991, p. 193
  158. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 386
  159. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 193–194
  160. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 195–196
  161. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 197
  162. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 198
  163. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 198–199
  164. ^ a b c Fine 1991, p. 199
  165. ^ a b Whittow 1996, p. 388
  166. ^ Fine 1991, p. 290
  167. ^ a b c d Angelov et al 1981, p. 170
  168. ^ a b Koledarov 1979, p. 11
  169. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 145–148
  170. ^ Whittow 1996, p. 289
  171. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 106–107
  172. ^ Fine 1991, p. 106
  173. ^ a b Andreev, Lazarov & Pavlov 1999, p. 175
  174. ^ Beshevliev 1992, pp. 67–68
  175. ^ a b c Angelov et al 1981, p. 175
  176. ^ Fine 1991, p. 104
  177. ^ Beshevliev 1992, p. 68
  178. ^ Beshevliev 1992, p. 70
  179. ^ Beshevliev 1992, p. 67
  180. ^ a b Beshevliev 1992, p. 99
  181. ^ a b Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 156
  182. ^ a b Beshevliev 1992, p. 66
  183. ^ a b c d Fine 1991, p. 108
  184. ^ a b c Fine 1991, pp. 119–120
  185. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 172
  186. ^ Fine 1991, p. 120
  187. ^ Beshevliev 1992, pp. 66–67
  188. ^ Beshevliev 1992, p. 75
  189. ^ Biliarsky 2011, p. 13
  190. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 139
  191. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 102–103
  192. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 154
  193. ^ a b c d Angelov et al 1981, p. 167
  194. ^ Angelov et al 1981, pp. 356–357, 365
  195. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 169
  196. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 153
  197. ^ a b Angelov 1971, p. 247
  198. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 179
  199. ^ Fine 1991, p. 165
  200. ^ a b Angelov 1971, p. 248
  201. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 180
  202. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 145
  203. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 141
  204. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 147
  205. ^ a b c d e Fine 1991, p. 129
  206. ^ Angelov 1971, pp. 269–270
  207. ^ a b c d New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, p. 237
  208. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 341
  209. ^ a b c d Angelov et al 1981, p. 80
  210. ^ a b "Scrptor incertus" in GIBI, vol. IV, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, p. 23
  211. ^ a b Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 137
  212. ^ a b c d Angelov et al 1981, p. 144
  213. ^ a b Koledarov 1979, p. 13
  214. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 81
  215. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 256
  216. ^ Angelov et al 1981, pp. 288–289
  217. ^ Haldon 1999, p. 186
  218. ^ "Strategikon by Kekaumenos" in GIBI, vol. VII, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, p. 20
  219. ^ "Scrptor incertus" in GIBI, vol. IV, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, pp. 2324
  220. ^ a b c Angelov et al 1981, p. 339
  221. ^ a b c d Angelov et al 1981, p. 340
  222. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 304
  223. ^ a b c Fine 1991, p. 133
  224. ^ Koledarov 1979, p. 20
  225. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 348
  226. ^ a b c d e Fine 1991, p. 169
  227. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 183–184
  228. ^ a b c Angelov et al 1981, p. 298
  229. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 345
  230. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 170
  231. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 342
  232. ^ a b c Bairoch, Paul (1988). Cities and Economic Development. University of Chicago Press. p. 123. ISBN 978-0226034669. 
  233. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 350
  234. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 357
  235. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 351
  236. ^ a b c Angelov et al 1981, p. 193
  237. ^ a b c Whittow 1996, p. 282
  238. ^ Beshevliev 1992, p. 132
  239. ^ a b Andreev & Lalkov 1996, p. 58
  240. ^ a b c Andreev & Lalkov 1996, p. 54
  241. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 107–108
  242. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 103–105
  243. ^ Fine 1991, p. 105
  244. ^ a b Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 147
  245. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, pp. 147–148
  246. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, pp. 156–157
  247. ^ Bozhilov & Gyuzelev 1999, p. 159
  248. ^ Fine 1991, p. 117
  249. ^ Whittow 1996, pp. 280–281
  250. ^ New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, p. 240
  251. ^ a b c d e f Fine 1991, p. 118
  252. ^ Fine 1991, p. 116
  253. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 118–119
  254. ^ Fine 1991, p. 121
  255. ^ Fine 1991, p. 124
  256. ^ a b c Fine 1991, p. 125
  257. ^ a b c Whittow 1996, p. 284
  258. ^ New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2 1995, p. 241
  259. ^ Fine 1991, p. 134
  260. ^ a b Zlatarski 1972, p. 389
  261. ^ Zlatarski 1972, pp. 390–391
  262. ^ Andreev & Lalkov 1996, p. 108
  263. ^ Zlatarski 1972, pp. 507–508
  264. ^ "Charters of Basil II" in GIBI, vol. VI, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, pp. 41pp. 47
  265. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 191–192
  266. ^ Fine 1991, p. 168
  267. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 234
  268. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 375
  269. ^ Fine 1991, p. 185
  270. ^ Fine 1991, p. 172
  271. ^ a b c Fine 1991, p. 176
  272. ^ a b c d Kazhdan 1991, p. 301
  273. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 173
  274. ^ Angelov et al 1981, pp. 383, 387
  275. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 385
  276. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 261
  277. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 262
  278. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 264
  279. ^ a b c d e Fine 1991, p. 128
  280. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 270
  281. ^ Pounds, Normal J. G. (1973). An historical geography of Europe, 450 B.C.-A.D. 1330. Cambridge University Press. p. 179. ISBN 0-521-29126-7. 
  282. ^ Angelov et al 1981, pp. 268–269
  283. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 128–129
  284. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 186
  285. ^ Чеботаренко, Г. Ф. (1969). Материалы к археологической карте памятников VIII-Х вв. южной части Пруто-Днестровского междуречья//Далекое прошлое Молдавии. Кишинев. pp. 224–230. 
  286. ^ a b c Angelov et al 1981, p. 181
  287. ^ Angelov et al 1981, pp. 181–182
  288. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 182
  289. ^ a b c Angelov et al 1981, p. 185
  290. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 296
  291. ^ Angelov et al 1981, pp. 296–297
  292. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 297
  293. ^ a b c Angelov et al 1981, p. 300
  294. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 232
  295. ^ a b c Angelov et al 1981, p. 233
  296. ^ a b c Angelov et al 1981, p. 427
  297. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 129–130
  298. ^ a b Angelov et al 1981, p. 301
  299. ^ Angelov et al 1981, pp. 300–301
  300. ^ a b c d e Kazhdan 1991, p. 335
  301. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 257
  302. ^ Angelov et al 1981, pp. 232–233
  303. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 428
  304. ^ a b "Madara Rider". Official Site of UNESCO. Retrieved 11 February 2017. 
  305. ^ a b c d e f g h Angelov et al 1981, p. 188
  306. ^ a b c d Sophoulis 2011, p. 83
  307. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 190
  308. ^ Donchev, Slavi (1981). The Madara Horseman (PDF). 23–24. ICOMOS. pp. 41–42. 
  309. ^ Kazhdan 1991, pp. 334–335
  310. ^ Donchev, Slavi (1981). The Madara Horseman (PDF). 23–24. ICOMOS. p. 41. 
  311. ^ Donchev, Slavi (1981). The Madara Horseman (PDF). 23–24. ICOMOS. p. 43. 
  312. ^ Angelov et al 1981, pp. 307–308
  313. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 308
  314. ^ Kazhdan 1991, p. 2084
  315. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 113
  316. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 114
  317. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 255
  318. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 136
  319. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 258
  320. ^ Poulton, Hugh (2000). Who are the Macedonians. Hurst & Co. Publishers. pp. 19–20. ISBN 1-85065-534-0. 
  321. ^ a b c d e f Kazhdan 1991, p. 336
  322. ^ Angelov et al 1981, p. 295
  323. ^ Fine 1991, pp. 134–136
  324. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 135
  325. ^ Andreev, Lazarov & Pavlov 1999, p. 210
  326. ^ Schenker, Alexander M. (2014). The Dawn of Slavic: An Introduction to Slavic Philology. Yale University Press. pp. 185–186, 189–190. ISBN 978-0300212402. 
  327. ^ Fortson, Benjamin W. (2004). Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishing. p. 374. ISBN 978-1-4051-0315-2. 
  328. ^ Angelov et al 1981, pp. 260–261
  329. ^ Kazhdan 1991, p. 337
  330. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 220
  331. ^ Fine 1991, p. 189




External links