HOME
The Info List - Federalist Party


--- Advertisement ---



The Federalist Party, referred to as the Pro-Administration Party until the 3rd United States Congress, was the first American political party. It existed from the early 1790s to 1816, though its remnants lasted into the 1820s. The Federalists called for a strong national government that promoted economic growth and fostered friendly relationships with Great Britain as well as opposition to revolutionary France. The party controlled the federal government until 1801, when it was overwhelmed by the Democratic-Republican
Democratic-Republican
opposition led by Thomas Jefferson. The Federalist Party
Federalist Party
came into being between 1792 and 1794 as a national coalition of bankers and businessmen in support of Alexander Hamilton's fiscal policies. These supporters developed into the organized Federalist Party, which was committed to a fiscally sound and nationalistic government. The only Federalist President was John Adams since although George Washington
George Washington
was broadly sympathetic to the Federalist program, he remained officially non-partisan during his entire presidency.[6] Federalist policies called for a national bank, tariffs and good relations with Great Britain
Great Britain
as expressed in the Jay Treaty
Jay Treaty
negotiated in 1794. Hamilton developed the concept of implied powers and successfully argued the adoption of that interpretation of the United States Constitution. Their political opponents, the Democratic-Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson, denounced most of the Federalist policies, especially the bank and implied powers; and vehemently attacked the Jay Treaty
Jay Treaty
as a sell-out of republican values to the British monarchy. The Jay Treaty
Jay Treaty
passed and the Federalists won most of the major legislative battles in the 1790s. They held a strong base in the nation's cities and in New England. After the Democratic-Republicans, whose base was in the rural South, won the hard-fought presidential election of 1800, the Federalists never returned to power. They recovered some strength by their intense opposition to the War of 1812, but they practically vanished during the Era of Good Feelings
Era of Good Feelings
that followed the end of the war in 1815.[7] The Federalists left a lasting legacy in the form of a strong Federal government with a sound financial base and after losing executive power they decisively shaped Supreme Court policy for another three decades through the person of Chief Justice John Marshall.[8]

Contents

1 Rise

1.1 Religious dimension

2 Party strength in Congress 3 Effects of foreign affairs

3.1 Jay Treaty

4 Whiskey Rebellion 5 Newspaper editors at war

5.1 Ceremonies and civil religion

6 Adams Administration: 1797–1801

6.1 Alien and Sedition Acts

7 Election of 1800 8 Federalists in opposition

8.1 Jefferson Administration 8.2 Anti-war party 8.3 Madison Administration

9 Opposition to the War of 1812 10 Interpretations 11 Presidents 12 Electoral history

12.1 Presidential elections 12.2 Congressional election

13 See also 14 References 15 Bibliography 16 External links

Rise[edit] On taking office in 1789, President Washington
Washington
nominated New York lawyer Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
to the office of Secretary of the Treasury. Hamilton wanted a strong national government with financial credibility. Hamilton proposed the ambitious Hamiltonian economic program that involved assumption of the state debts incurred during the American Revolution, creating a national debt and the means to pay it off and setting up a national bank, along with creating tariffs. James Madison
James Madison
was Hamilton's ally in the fight to ratify the new Constitution, but he and Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson
opposed Hamilton's programs by 1791. Political parties had not been anticipated when the Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified in 1788, even though both Hamilton and Madison played major roles. Parties were considered to be divisive and harmful to republicanism. No similar parties existed anywhere in the world.[6] By 1790, Hamilton started building a nationwide coalition. Realizing the need for vocal political support in the states, he formed connections with like-minded nationalists and used his network of treasury agents to link together friends of the government, especially merchants and bankers, in the new nation's dozen major cities. His attempts to manage politics in the national capital to get his plans through Congress, then, "brought strong" responses across the country. In the process, what began as a capital faction soon assumed status as a national faction and then, finally, as the new Federalist party."[9] The Federalist Party
Federalist Party
supported Hamilton's vision of a strong centralized government, and agreed with his proposals for a national bank and heavy government subsidies. In foreign affairs, they supported neutrality in the war between France and Great Britain.[10]

A portrait of Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
by John Trumbull, 1806

The majority of the Founding Fathers were originally Federalists. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison
James Madison
and many others can all be considered Federalists. These Federalists felt that the Articles of Confederation had been too weak to sustain a working government and had decided that a new form of government was needed. Hamilton was made Secretary of the Treasury and when he came up with the idea of funding the debt he created a split in the original Federalist group. Madison greatly disagreed with Hamilton not just on this issue, but on many others as well and he and John J. Beckley created the Anti-Federalist faction. These men would form the Republican party under Thomas Jefferson.[11] By the early 1790s, newspapers started calling Hamilton supporters "Federalists" and their opponents "Democrats," "Republicans", "Jeffersonians" or—much later—"Democratic-Republicans". Jefferson's supporters usually called themselves "Republicans" and their party the "Republican Party".[12] The Federalist Party
Federalist Party
became popular with businessmen and New Englanders as Republicans were mostly farmers who opposed a strong central government. Cities were usually Federalist strongholds whereas frontier regions were heavily Republican. However, these are generalizations as there are special cases: the Presbyterians of upland North Carolina, who had immigrated just before the Revolution and often been Tories, became Federalists.[13] The Congregationalists of New England and the Episcopalians in the larger cities supported the Federalists while other minority denominations tended toward the Republican camp. Catholics in Maryland were generally Federalists.[14] The state networks of both parties began to operate in 1794 or 1795. Patronage now became a factor. The winner-takes-all election system opened a wide gap between winners, who got all the patronage; and losers, who got none. Hamilton had many lucrative Treasury jobs to dispense—there were 1,700 of them by 1801.[15] Jefferson had one part-time job in the State Department, which he gave to journalist Philip Freneau
Philip Freneau
to attack the Federalists. In New York, George Clinton won the election for governor and used the vast state patronage fund to help the Republican cause. Washington
Washington
tried and failed to moderate the feud between his two top cabinet members.[16] He was re-elected without opposition in 1792. The Democratic-Republicans nominated New York's Governor Clinton to replace Federalist John Adams
John Adams
as Vice President, but Adams won. The balance of power in Congress was close, with some members still undecided between the parties. In early 1793, Jefferson secretly prepared resolutions introduced by William Branch Giles, Congressman from Virginia, designed to repudiate Hamilton and weaken the Washington
Washington
Administration.[17] Hamilton defended his administration of the nation's complicated financial affairs, which none of his critics could decipher until the arrival in Congress of the Republican Albert Gallatin in 1793. Federalists counterattacked by claiming the Hamiltonian program had restored national prosperity as shown in one 1792 anonymous newspaper essay:[18]

To what physical, moral, or political energy shall this flourishing state of things be ascribed? There is but one answer to these inquiries: Public credit is restored and established. The general government, by uniting and calling into action the pecuniary resources of the states, has created a new capital stock of several millions of dollars, which, with that before existing, is directed into every branch of business, giving life and vigor to industry in its infinitely diversified operation. The enemies of the general government, the funding act and the National Bank may bellow tyranny, aristocracy, and speculators through the Union and repeat the clamorous din as long as they please; but the actual state of agriculture and commerce, the peace, the contentment and satisfaction of the great mass of people, give the lie to their assertions.

Jefferson wrote on February 12, 1798:

Two political Sects have arisen within the U. S. the one believing that the executive is the branch of our government which the most needs support; the other that like the analogous branch in the English Government, it is already too strong for the republican parts of the Constitution; and therefore in equivocal cases they incline to the legislative powers: the former of these are called federalists, sometimes aristocrats or monocrats, and sometimes tories, after the corresponding sect in the English Government of exactly the same definition: the latter are stiled republicans, whigs, jacobins, anarchists, disorganizers, etc. these terms are in familiar use with most persons."[19]

Religious dimension[edit] In New England, the Federalist party was closely linked to the Congregational church. When the party collapsed, the church was disestablished.[20] In 1800 and others elections, the Federalists targeted infidelity in any form. They repeatedly charged that Republican candidates, especially Jefferson, were atheistic or nonreligious. Conversely, the Baptists, Methodists and other dissenters as well as the religiously nonaligned favored the Republican cause.[21] Jefferson told the Baptists of Connecticut there should be a "wall of separation" between church and state.[22][23] Party strength in Congress[edit] Many Congressmen were very hard to classify in the first few years, but after 1796 there was more certainty.

Election year

House 1788 1790 1792 1794 1796 1798 1800 1802 1804 1806 1808 1810 1812 1814 1816 1818 1820 1822

Federalist 37 39 51 47 57 60 38 39 25 24 50 36 68 64 39 26 32 24

Republican 28 30 54 59 49 46 65 103 116 118 92 107 114 119 146 160 155 189

% Republican 43% 43% 51% 56% 46% 43% 63% 73% 82% 83% 65% 75% 63% 65% 79% 86% 83% 89%

Senate 1788 1790 1792 1794 1796 1798 1800 1802 1804 1806 1808 1810 1812 1814 1816 1818 1820 1822

Federalist 18 16 16 21 22 22 15 9 7 6 7 6 8 12 12 9 7 3

Republican 8 13 14 11 10 10 17 25 27 28 27 30 28 26 30 37 44 44

% Republican 31% 45% 47% 34% 31% 31% 53% 74% 71% 82% 79% 83% 78% 68% 71% 80% 92% 94%

Source: Kenneth C. Martis, The Historical Atlas of Political Parties in the United States Congress, 1789–1989 (1989). The numbers are estimates by historians. The affiliation of many Congressmen in the earliest years is an assignment by later historians. The parties were slowly coalescing groups; at first there were many independents. Cunningham noted that only about a quarter of the House of Representatives up until 1794 voted with Madison as much as two-thirds of the time and another quarter against him two-thirds of the time, leaving almost half as fairly independent.[24] Effects of foreign affairs[edit] International affairs—the French Revolution
French Revolution
and the subsequent war between royalist Britain and republican France—decisively shaped American politics in 1793–1800 and threatened to entangle the nation in wars that "mortally threatened its very existence".[25] The French revolutionaries guillotined King Louis XVI in January 1793, leading the British to declare war to restore the monarchy. The King had been decisive in helping the United States achieve independence, but now he was dead and many of the pro-American aristocrats in France were exiled or executed. Federalists warned that American republicans threatened to replicate the horrors of the French Revolution
French Revolution
and successfully mobilized most conservatives and many clergymen. The Republicans, some of whom had been strong Francophiles, responded with support even through the Reign of Terror, when thousands were guillotined, though it was at this point that many began backing away from their pro-France leanings.[26] Many of those executed had been friends of the United States, such as the Comte D'Estaing, whose fleet had fought alongside the Americans in the Revolution (Lafayette had already fled into exile, and Thomas Paine
Thomas Paine
went to prison in France). The Republicans denounced Hamilton, Adams and even Washington
Washington
as friends of Britain, as secret monarchists and as enemies of the republican values. The level of rhetoric reached a fever pitch.[27][28] In 1793, Paris sent a new minister, Edmond-Charles Genêt
Edmond-Charles Genêt
(known as Citizen Genêt), who systematically mobilized pro-French sentiment and encouraged Americans to support France's war against Britain and Spain. Genêt funded local Democratic-Republican
Democratic-Republican
Societies that attacked Federalists.[29] He hoped for a favorable new treaty and for repayment of the debts owed to France. Acting aggressively, Genêt outfitted privateers that sailed with American crews under a French flag and attacked British shipping. He tried to organize expeditions of Americans to invade Spanish Louisiana and Spanish Florida. When Secretary of State Jefferson told Genêt he was pushing American friendship past the limit, Genêt threatened to go over the government's head and rouse public opinion on behalf of France. Even Jefferson agreed this was blatant foreign interference in domestic politics. Genêt's extremism seriously embarrassed the Jeffersonians and cooled popular support for promoting the French Revolution
French Revolution
and getting involved in its wars. Recalled to Paris for execution, Genêt kept his head and instead went to New York, where he became a citizen and married the daughter of Governor Clinton.[30] Jefferson left office, ending the coalition cabinet and allowing the Federalists to dominate.[31] Jay Treaty[edit] The Jay Treaty
Jay Treaty
battle in 1794–95 was the effort by Washington, Hamilton and John Jay
John Jay
to resolve numerous difficulties with Britain. Some of these issues dated to the Revolution, such as boundaries, debts owed in each direction and the continued presence of British forts in the Northwest Territory. In addition, the United States hoped to open markets in the British Caribbean and end disputes stemming from the naval war between Britain and France. Most of all the goal was to avert a war with Britain—a war opposed by the Federalists, that some historians claim the Jeffersonians wanted.[32] As a neutral party, the United States argued it had the right to carry goods anywhere it wanted. The British nevertheless seized American ships carrying goods from the French West Indies. The Federalists favored Britain in the war and by far most of America's foreign trade was with Britain, hence a new treaty was called for. The British agreed to evacuate the western forts, open their West Indies ports to American ships, allow small vessels to trade with the French West Indies and set up a commission that would adjudicate American claims against Britain for seized ships and British claims against Americans for debts incurred before 1775. One possible alternative was war with Britain, a war that the United States was ill-prepared to fight.[33] The Republicans wanted to pressure Britain to the brink of war (and assumed that the United States could defeat a weak Britain).[34] Therefore, they denounced the Jay Treaty
Jay Treaty
as an insult to American prestige, a repudiation of the French alliance of 1777 and a severe shock to Southern planters who owed those old debts and who were never to collect for the lost slaves the British captured. Republicans protested against the treaty and organized their supporters. The Federalists realized they had to mobilize their popular vote, so they mobilized their newspapers, held rallies, counted votes and especially relied on the prestige of President Washington. The contest over the Jay Treaty
Jay Treaty
marked the first flowering of grassroots political activism in the United States, directed and coordinated by two national parties. Politics was no longer the domain of politicians as every voter was called on to participate. The new strategy of appealing directly to the public worked for the Federalists as public opinion shifted to support the Jay Treaty.[35] The Federalists controlled the Senate and they ratified it by exactly the necessary ⅔ vote (20–10) in 1795. However, the Republicans did not give up and public opinion swung toward the Republicans after the Treaty fight and in the South the Federalists lost most of the support they had among planters.[36] Whiskey Rebellion[edit] The excise tax of 1791 caused grumbling from the frontier including threats of tax resistance. Corn, the chief crop on the frontier, was too bulky to ship over the mountains to market unless it was first distilled into whiskey. This was profitable as the United States population consumed per capita relatively large quantities of liquor. After the excise tax, the backwoodsmen complained the tax fell on them rather than on the consumers. Cash poor, they were outraged that they had been singled out to pay off the "financiers and speculators" back East and to salary the federal revenue officers who began to swarm the hills looking for illegal stills.[37] Insurgents in western Pennsylvania shut the courts and hounded federal officials, but Jeffersonian leader Albert Gallatin
Albert Gallatin
mobilized the western moderates and thus forestalled a serious outbreak. Washington, seeing the need to assert federal supremacy, called out 13,000 state militia and marched toward Washington, Pennsylvania
Washington, Pennsylvania
to suppress this Whiskey Rebellion. The rebellion evaporated in late 1794 as Washington approached, personally leading the army (only two sitting Presidents have directly led American military forces, Washington
Washington
during the Whiskey Rebellion
Whiskey Rebellion
and Madison in an attempt to save the White
White
House during the War of 1812). The rebels dispersed and there was no fighting. Federalists were relieved that the new government proved capable of overcoming rebellion while Republicans, with Gallatin their new hero, argued there never was a real rebellion and the whole episode was manipulated in order to accustom Americans to a standing army. Angry petitions flowed in from three dozen Democratic-Republican Societies created by Citizen Genêt. Washington
Washington
attacked the societies as illegitimate and many disbanded. Federalists now ridiculed Republicans as "democrats" (meaning in favor of mob rule) or "Jacobins" (a reference to The Terror in France). Washington
Washington
refused to run for a third term, establishing a two-term precedent that was to stand until 1940 and eventually to be enshrined in the Constitution as the 22nd Amendment. He warned in his Farewell Address against involvement in European wars and lamented the rising North-South sectionalism and party spirit in politics that threatened national unity:

The party spirits serves always to distract the Public Councils, and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

Washington
Washington
never considered himself a member of any party, but broadly supported most Federalist policies.[38] Newspaper editors at war[edit] The spoils system helped finance Federalist printers until 1801 and Republican editors after that. Federalist Postmasters General, Timothy Pickering (1791–94) and Joseph Habersham
Joseph Habersham
(1795–1801) appointed and removed local postmasters to maximize party funding. Numerous printers were appointed as postmasters. They did not deliver the mail, but they did collect fees from mail users and obtained free delivery of their own newspapers and business mail.[39][40] To strengthen their coalitions and hammer away constantly at the opposition, both parties sponsored newspapers in the capital (Philadelphia) and other major cities.[41] On the Republican side, Philip Freneau
Philip Freneau
and Benjamin Franklin
Benjamin Franklin
Bache blasted the administration with all the scurrility at their command. Bache in particular targeted Washington
Washington
himself as the front man for monarchy who must be exposed. To Bache, Washington
Washington
was a cowardly general and a money-hungry baron who saw the Revolution as a means to advance his fortune and fame; Adams was a failed diplomat who never forgave the French their love of Benjamin Franklin
Benjamin Franklin
and who craved a crown for himself and his descendants; and Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
was the most inveterate monarchist of them all.[42] The Federalists, with twice as many newspapers at their command, slashed back with equal vituperation. John Fenno and "Peter Porcupine" (William Cobbett) were their nastiest penmen and Noah Webster
Noah Webster
their most learned. Hamilton subsidized the Federalist editors, wrote for their papers and in 1801 established his own paper, the New York Evening Post. Though his reputation waned considerably following his death, Joseph Dennie
Joseph Dennie
ran three of the most popular and influential newspapers of the period, The Farmer's Weekly Museum, the Gazette of the United States and The Port Folio.[43] Ceremonies and civil religion[edit]

The Apotheosis of Washington
Washington
as seen looking up from the Capitol rotunda in Washington, D.C.

The Federalists were conscious of the need to boost voter identification with their party. Elections remained of central importance, but the rest of the political calendar was filled with celebrations, parades, festivals and visual sensationalism.[44] The Federalists employed multiple festivities, exciting parades and even quasi-religious pilgrimages and "sacred" days that became incorporated into the American civil religion. George Washington
George Washington
was always their hero and after his death he became viewed as a sort of demigod looking down from heaven to bestow his blessings on the party. At first, the Federalists focused on commemorating the ratification of the Constitution and organized parades to demonstrate widespread popular support for the new Federalist Party. The parade organizers incorporated secular versions of traditional religious themes and rituals, thereby fostering a highly visible celebration of the nation's new civil religion.[45] The Fourth of July became a semi-sacred day—a status it maintains in the 21st century. Its celebration in Boston emphasized national over local patriotism and included orations, dinners, militia musters, parades, marching bands, floats and fireworks. By 1800, the Fourth of July was closely identified with the Federalist Party. Republicans were annoyed and staged their own celebrations on the same day—with rival parades sometimes clashing with each other, which generated even more excitement and larger crowds. After the collapse of the Federalists starting in 1815, the Fourth of July became a nonpartisan holiday.[46][47] Adams Administration: 1797–1801[edit] Main article: John Adams

President John Adams

Hamilton distrusted Vice President Adams—who felt the same way about Hamilton—but was unable to block his claims to the succession. The election of 1796 was the first partisan affair in the nation's history and one of the more scurrilous in terms of newspaper attacks. Adams swept New England and Jefferson the South, with the middle states leaning to Adams. Adams was the winner by a margin of three electoral votes and Jefferson, as the runner-up, became Vice President under the system set out in the Constitution prior to the ratification of the 12th Amendment.[48] The Federalists were strongest in New England, but also had strengths in the middle states. They elected Adams as President in 1796, when they controlled both houses of Congress, the presidency, eight state legislatures and ten governorships.[49] Foreign affairs continued to be the central concern of American politics, for the war raging in Europe threatened to drag in the United States. The new President was a loner, who made decisions without consulting Hamilton or other "High Federalists". Benjamin Franklin once quipped that Adams was a man always honest, often brilliant and sometimes mad. Adams was popular among the Federalist rank and file, but had neglected to build state or local political bases of his own and neglected to take control of his own cabinet. As a result, his cabinet answered more to Hamilton than to himself. Hamilton was especially popular because he rebuilt the Army—and had commissions to give out.[50] Alien and Sedition Acts[edit] After an American delegation was insulted in Paris in the XYZ affair (1797), public opinion ran strongly against the French. An undeclared "Quasi-War" with France from 1798 to 1800 saw each side attacking and capturing the other's shipping. It was called "quasi" because there was no declaration of war, but escalation was a serious threat. At the peak of their popularity, the Federalists took advantage by preparing for an invasion by the French Army. To silence Administration critics, the Federalists passed the Alien and Sedition Acts
Alien and Sedition Acts
in 1798. The Alien Act empowered the President to deport such aliens as he declared to be dangerous. The Sedition Act made it a crime to print false, scandalous and malicious criticisms of the federal government, but it conspicuously failed to criminalize criticism of Vice President Thomas Jefferson.[51] Several Republican newspaper editors were convicted under the Act and fined or jailed and three Democratic-Republican
Democratic-Republican
newspapers were shut down.[52] In response, Jefferson and Madison secretly wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions
Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions
passed by the two states' legislatures that declared the Alien and Sedition Acts unconstitutional and insisted the states had the power to nullify federal laws. Undaunted, the Federalists created a navy, with new frigates; and a large new army, with Washington
Washington
in nominal command and Hamilton in actual command. To pay for it all, they raised taxes on land, houses and slaves, leading to serious unrest. In one part of Pennsylvania, the Fries' Rebellion broke out, with people refusing to pay the new taxes. John Fries was sentenced to death for treason, but received a pardon from Adams. In the elections of 1798, the Federalists did very well, but this issue started hurting the Federalists in 1799. Early in 1799, Adams decided to free himself from Hamilton's overbearing influence, stunning the country and throwing his party into disarray by announcing a new peace mission to France. The mission eventually succeeded, the "Quasi-War" ended and the new army was largely disbanded. Hamiltonians called Adams a failure while Adams fired Hamilton's supporters still in the cabinet. Hamilton and Adams intensely disliked one another and the Federalists split between supporters of Hamilton ("High Federalists") and supporters of Adams. Hamilton became embittered over his loss of political influence and wrote a scathing criticism of Adams' performance as President in an effort to throw Federalist support to Charles Cotesworth Pinckney. Inadvertently, this split the Federalists and helped give the victory to Jefferson.[53] Election of 1800[edit] Main article: United States presidential election, 1800 Adams's peace moves proved popular with the Federalist rank and file and he seemed to stand a good chance of re-election in 1800. If the Three-Fifths Compromise
Three-Fifths Compromise
had not been enacted, he most likely would have won reelection since many Federalist legislatures removed the right to select electors from their constituents in fear of a Democratic victory. Jefferson was again the opponent and Federalists pulled out all stops in warning that he was a dangerous revolutionary, hostile to religion, who would weaken the government, damage the economy and get into war with Britain. Many believed that if Jefferson won the election, it would be the end of the newly formed United States. The Republicans crusaded against the Alien and Sedition laws as well as the new taxes and proved highly effective in mobilizing popular discontent.[16] The election hinged on New York as its electors were selected by the legislature and given the balance of North and South, they would decide the presidential election. Aaron Burr
Aaron Burr
brilliantly organized his forces in New York City in the spring elections for the state legislature. By a few hundred votes, he carried the city—and thus the state legislature—and guaranteed the election of a Republican President. As a reward, he was selected by the Republican caucus in Congress as their vice presidential candidate. Alexander Hamilton, knowing the election was lost anyway, went public with a sharp attack on Adams that further divided and weakened the Federalists.[54] Members of the Republican Party planned to vote evenly for Jefferson and Burr because they did not want for it to seem as if their party was divided. The party took the meaning literally and Jefferson and Burr tied in the election with 73 electoral votes. This sent the election to the House of Representatives to break the tie. The Federalists had enough weight in the House to swing the election in either direction. Many would rather have seen Burr in the office over Jefferson, but Hamilton, who had a strong dislike of Burr, threw his political weight behind Jefferson. During the election, neither Jefferson nor Burr attempted to swing the election in the House of Representatives. Jefferson remained at Monticello to oversee the laying of bricks to a section of his home. Jefferson allowed for his political beliefs and other ideologies to filter out through letters to his contacts. Thanks to Hamilton's support, Jefferson would win the election and Burr would become his Vice President. Many Federalists held to the belief that this was the end of the United States and that the experiment they had begun had ended in failure.[55] This unintended complication led directly to the proposal and ratification of the 12th Amendment. "We are all republicans—we are all federalists", proclaimed Jefferson in his inaugural address.[56] This election marked the first time power had been transferred between opposing political parties, an act that occurred remarkably without bloodshed. Though there had been strong words and disagreements, contrary to the Federalists fears, there was no war and no ending of one government system to let in a new one. His patronage policy was to let the Federalists disappear through attrition. Those Federalists such as John Quincy Adams
John Quincy Adams
(John Adams' own son) and Rufus King
Rufus King
willing to work with him were rewarded with senior diplomatic posts, but there was no punishment of the opposition.[57] Federalists in opposition[edit] Fisher Ames
Fisher Ames
(1758–1808) of Massachusetts
Massachusetts
ranks as one of the more influential figures of his era.[58] Ames led Federalist ranks in the House of Representatives. His acceptance of the Bill of Rights garnered support in Massachusetts
Massachusetts
for the new Constitution. His greatest fame came as an orator who defined the principles of the Federalist Party
Federalist Party
and the follies of the Republicans. Ames offered one of the first great speeches in American Congressional history when he spoke in favor of the Jay Treaty. Ames was part of Hamilton's faction and cautioned against the excesses of democracy unfettered by morals and reason: "Popular reason does not always know how to act right, nor does it always act right when it knows".[59] He warned his countrymen of the dangers of flattering demagogues, who incite dis-union and lead their country into bondage: "Our country is too big for union, too sordid for patriotism, too democratic for liberty. What is to become of it, He who made it best knows. Its vice will govern it, by practising upon its folly. This is ordained for democracies".[60] Jefferson Administration[edit] Main article: Thomas Jefferson

President Thomas Jefferson

Jefferson had a very successful first term, typified by the Louisiana Purchase, which was ironically supported by Hamilton, but opposed by most Federalists at the time as unconstitutional. Some Federalist leaders (Essex Junto) began courting Jefferson's Vice President and Hamilton's nemesis Aaron Burr
Aaron Burr
in an attempt to swing New York into an independent confederation with the New England states, which along with New York were supposed to secede from the United States after Burr's election to Governor. However, Hamilton's influence cost Burr the governorship of New York, a key in the Essex Junto's plan, just as Hamilton's influence had cost Burr the presidency nearly four years before. Hamilton's thwarting of Aaron Burr's ambitions for the second time was too much for Burr to bear. Hamilton had known of the Essex Junto (whom Hamilton now regarded as apostate Federalists) and Burr's plans and opposed them vehemently. This opposition by Hamilton would lead to his fatal duel with Burr in July 1804.[61] The thoroughly disorganized Federalists hardly offered any opposition to Jefferson's reelection in 1804 and Federalists seemed doomed. Jefferson had taken away most of their patronage, including federal judgeships. The party now controlled only five state legislatures and seven governorships. After again losing the presidency in 1804, the party was now down to three legislatures and five governorships (four in New England). Their majorities in Congress were long gone, dropping in the Senate from 23 and 1796, 218 and 1800 to only six in 1804.[62] In New England and in some districts in the middle states, the Federalists clung to power, but the tendency from 1800 to 1812 was steady slippage almost everywhere as the Republicans perfected their organization and the Federalists tried to play catch-up. Some younger leaders tried to emulate the Democratic-Republican
Democratic-Republican
tactics, but their overall disdain of democracy along with the upper class bias of the party leadership eroded public support. In the South, the Federalists steadily lost ground everywhere.[53] The Federalists continued for several years to be a major political party in New England and the Northeast, but never regained control of the presidency or the Congress. With the death of Washington
Washington
and Hamilton and the retirement of Adams, the Federalists were left without a strong leader as Chief Justice John Marshall
John Marshall
stayed out of politics. However, a few younger leaders did appear, notably Daniel Webster. Federalist policies favored factories, banking and trade over agriculture and therefore became unpopular in the growing Western states. They were increasingly seen as aristocratic and unsympathetic to democracy. In the South, the party had lingering support in Maryland, but elsewhere was crippled by 1800 and faded away by 1808.[63] Massachusetts
Massachusetts
and Connecticut remained the party strongholds. Historian Richard J. Purcell explains how well organized the party was in Connecticut:

It was only necessary to perfect the working methods of the organized body of office-holders who made up the nucleus of the party. There were the state officers, the assistants, and a large majority of the Assembly. In every county there was a sheriff with his deputies. All of the state, county, and town judges were potential and generally active workers. Every town had several justices of the peace, school directors and, in Federalist towns, all the town officers who were ready to carry on the party's work. Every parish had a "standing agent," whose anathemas were said to convince at least ten voting deacons. Militia officers, state's attorneys, lawyers, professors and schoolteachers were in the van of this "conscript army." In all, about a thousand or eleven hundred dependent officer-holders were described as the inner ring which could always be depended upon for their own and enough more votes within their control to decide an election. This was the Federalist machine.[64]

After 1800, the major Federalist role came in the judiciary. Although Jefferson managed to repeal the Judiciary Act of 1801
Judiciary Act of 1801
and thus dismissed many lower level Federalist federal judges, the effort to impeach Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase
Samuel Chase
in 1804 failed. Led by the last great Federalist, John Marshall
John Marshall
as Chief Justice from 1801 to 1835, the Supreme Court carved out a unique and powerful role as the protector of the Constitution and promoter of nationalism.[65] Anti-war party[edit] As the wars in Europe intensified, the United States became increasingly involved. The Federalists restored some of their strength by leading the anti-war opposition to Jefferson and Madison between 1807 and 1814. President Jefferson imposed an embargo on Britain in 1807 as the Embargo Act of 1807
Embargo Act of 1807
prevented all American ships from sailing to a foreign port. The idea was that the British were so dependent on American supplies that they would come to terms. For 15 months, the Embargo wrecked American export businesses, largely based in the Boston-New York region, causing a sharp depression in the Northeast. Evasion was common and Jefferson and Treasury Secretary Gallatin responded with tightened police controls more severe than anything the Federalists had ever proposed. Public opinion was highly negative and a surge of support breathed fresh life into the Federalist Party.[66] The Republicans nominated Madison for the presidency in 1808. Meeting in the first-ever national convention, Federalists considered the option of nominating Jefferson's Vice President George Clinton as their own candidate, but balked at working with him and again chose Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, their 1804 candidate. Madison lost New England excluding Vermont, but swept the rest of the country and carried a Republican Congress. Madison dropped the Embargo, opened up trade again and offered a carrot and stick approach. If either France or Britain agreed to stop their violations of American neutrality, the United States would cut off trade with the other country. Tricked by Napoleon into believing France had acceded to his demands, Madison turned his wrath on Britain and the War of 1812
War of 1812
began.[67] Young Daniel Webster, running for Congress from New Hampshire in 1812, first gained overnight fame with his anti-war speeches.[68] Madison Administration[edit] Main article: James Madison

President James Madison

The nation was at war during the 1812 presidential election and war was the burning issue. Opposition to the war was strong in traditional Federalist strongholds in New England and New York, where the party made a comeback in the elections of 1812 and 1814. In their second national convention in 1812, the Federalists, now the peace party, nominated DeWitt Clinton, the dissident Republican Mayor of New York City and an articulate opponent of the war. Madison ran for reelection promising a relentless war against Britain and an honorable peace. Clinton, denouncing Madison's weak leadership and incompetent preparations for war, could count on New England and New York. To win, he needed the middle states and there the campaign was fought out. Those states were competitive and had the best-developed local parties and most elaborate campaign techniques, including nominating conventions and formal party platforms. The Tammany Society in New York City highly favored Madison and the Federalists finally adopted the club idea in 1808. Their Washington Benevolent Societies were semi-secret membership organizations which played a critical role in every northern state as they held meetings and rallies and mobilized Federalist votes.[69] New Jersey went for Clinton, but Madison carried Pennsylvania and thus was reelected with 59% of the electoral votes. However, the Federalists gained 14 seats in Congress. Opposition to the War of 1812[edit] The War of 1812
War of 1812
went poorly for the Americans for two years. Even though Britain was concentrating its military efforts on its war with Napoleon, the United States still failed to make any headway on land and was effectively blockaded at sea by the Royal Navy. The British raided and burned Washington, D.C.
Washington, D.C.
in 1814 and sent a force to capture New Orleans. The war was especially unpopular in New England: the New England economy was highly dependent on trade and the British blockade threatened to destroy it entirely. In 1814, the British Navy finally managed to enforce their blockade on the New England coast, so the Federalists of New England sent delegates to the Hartford Convention in December 1814. During the proceedings of the Hartford Convention, secession from the Union was discussed, though the resulting report listed a set of grievances against the Democratic-Republican
Democratic-Republican
federal government and proposed a set of Constitutional amendments to address these grievances. They demanded financial assistance from Washington
Washington
to compensate for lost trade and proposed constitutional amendments requiring a two-thirds vote in Congress before an embargo could be imposed, new states admitted, or war declared. It also indicated that if these proposals were ignored, then another convention should be called and given "such powers and instructions as the exigency of a crisis may require". The Federalist Massachusetts
Massachusetts
Governor had already secretly sent word to England to broker a separate peace accord. Three Massachusetts
Massachusetts
"ambassadors" were sent to Washington
Washington
to negotiate on the basis of this report. By the time the Federalist "ambassadors" got to Washington, the war was over and news of Andrew Jackson's stunning victory in the Battle of New Orleans had raised American morale immensely. The "ambassadors" hastened back to Massachusetts, but not before they had done fatal damage to the Federalist Party. The Federalists were thereafter associated with the disloyalty and parochialism of the Hartford Convention and destroyed as a political force. Across the nation, Republicans used the great victory at New Orleans to ridicule the Federalists as cowards, defeatists and secessionists. Pamphlets, songs, newspaper editorials, speeches and entire plays on the Battle of New Orleans drove home the point.[70] They fielded their last presidential candidate (Rufus King) in 1816. With its passing partisan hatreds and newspaper feuds declined and the nation entered the "Era of Good Feelings". After the dissolution of the final Federalist congressional caucus in 1825, the last traces of Federalist activity came in Delaware and Massachusetts
Massachusetts
local politics in the late 1820s, where in 1829 Harrison Gray Otis was elected Mayor of Boston and became the last major Federalist office holder. As late as 1828, the party won control of the Delaware state legislature and as late as 1830 the Federalists controlled the Massachusetts
Massachusetts
Senate. Interpretations[edit] Intellectually, Federalists were profoundly devoted to liberty. As Samuel Eliot Morison
Samuel Eliot Morison
explained, they believed that liberty is inseparable from union, that men are essentially unequal, that vox populi ("voice of the people") is seldom if ever vox Dei ("the voice of God") and that sinister outside influences are busy undermining American integrity.[71] Oxford-trained British historian Patrick Allitt concludes that Federalists promoted many positions that would form the baseline for later American conservatism, including the rule of law under the Constitution, republican government, peaceful change through elections, judicial supremacy, stable national finances, credible and active diplomacy and protection of wealth.[72] In terms of "classical conservatism", the Federalists had no truck with European-style aristocracy, monarchy, or established religion. Historian John P. Diggins says: "Thanks to the framers, American conservatism began on a genuinely lofty plane. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Marshall, John Jay, James Wilson, and, above all, John Adams
John Adams
aspired to create a republic in which the values so precious to conservatives might flourish: harmony, stability, virtue, reverence, veneration, loyalty, self-discipline, and moderation. This was classical conservatism in its most authentic expression".[4] The Federalists were dominated by businessmen and merchants in the major cities who supported a strong national government. The party was closely linked to the modernizing, urbanizing, financial policies of Alexander Hamilton. These policies included the funding of the national debt and also assumption of state debts incurred during the Revolutionary War, the incorporation of a national Bank of the United States, the support of manufactures and industrial development, and the use of a tariff to fund the Treasury. In foreign affairs, the Federalists opposed the French Revolution, engaged in the "Quasi War" (an undeclared naval war) with France in 1798–99, sought good relations with Britain and sought a strong army and navy. Ideologically, the controversy between Republicans and Federalists stemmed from a difference of principle and style. In terms of style, the Federalists feared mob rule, thought an educated elite should represent the general populace in national governance and favored national power over state power. Republicans distrusted Britain, bankers, merchants and did not want a powerful national government. The Federalists, notably Hamilton, were distrustful of "the people", the French and the Republicans.[73] In the end, the nation synthesized the two positions, adopting representative democracy and a strong nation state. Just as importantly, American politics by the 1820s accepted the two-party system whereby rival parties stake their claims before the electorate and the winner takes control of majorities in state legislatures and the Congress and gains governorships and the presidency. As time went on, the Federalists lost appeal with the average voter and were generally not equal to the tasks of party organization, hence they grew steadily weaker as the political triumphs of the Republican Party grew.[74] For economic and philosophical reasons, the Federalists tended to be pro-British—the United States engaged in more trade with Great Britain
Great Britain
than with any other country—and vociferously opposed Jefferson's Embargo Act of 1807
Embargo Act of 1807
and the seemingly deliberate provocation of war with Britain by the Madison Administration. During "Mr. Madison's War", as they called it, the Federalists made a temporary comeback.[75] However, they lost all their gains and more during the patriotic euphoria that followed the war. The membership was aging rapidly,[76] but a few young men from New England did join the cause, most notably Daniel Webster. After 1816, the Federalists had no national power base apart from John Marshall's Supreme Court. They had some local support in New England, New York, eastern Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware. After the collapse of the Federalist Party
Federalist Party
in the course of the 1824 presidential election, most surviving Federalists (including Daniel Webster) joined former Republicans like Henry Clay
Henry Clay
to form the National Republican Party, which was soon combined with other anti-Jackson groups to form the Whig Party in 1833. By then, nearly all remaining Federalists joined the Whigs. However, some former Federalists like James Buchanan, Louis McLane
Louis McLane
and Roger B. Taney became Jacksonian Democrats.[77] The "Old Republicans", led by John Randolph of Roanoke, refused to form a coalition with the Federalists and instead set up a separate opposition since Jefferson, Madison, Gallatin, Monroe, John C. Calhoun and Clay had in effect adopted Federalist principles of implied powers to purchase the Louisiana Territory and after the failures and lessons of the War of 1812
War of 1812
raised tariffs to protect factories, chartered the Second national bank, promoted a strong army and navy and promoted internal improvements. All these measures were opposed to the strict construction of the Constitution, which was the formal basis of the Republicans, but the drift of the party to support them could not be checked. It was aided by the Supreme Court, whose influence under John Marshall as a nationalizing factor now first became apparent. The whole change reconciled the federalists to their absorption into the Republican Party. Indeed, they claimed, with considerable show of justice, that the absorption was in the other direction: that the Republicans had recanted and that the "Washington-Monroe policy", as they termed it after 1820, was all that federalists had ever desired.[78] The name "Federalist" came increasingly to be used in political rhetoric as a term of abuse and was denied by the Whigs, who pointed out that their leader Henry Clay
Henry Clay
was the Republican Party leader in Congress during the 1810s.[79] The Federalists had a weak base in the South, with their main base in the Northeast and especially New England. It was the reverse for the Republicans. As a result, anti-slavery elements were largely based in the Federalist Party. Several leading Federalists, most notably John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, were leaders of the anti-slavery movement. They led the successful battles to abolish the international slave trade in New York City and the battle to abolish slavery in the state of New York.[80] Presidents[edit]

# Name Portrait State Presidency start date Presidency end date

2 John Adams

Massachusetts March 4, 1797 March 4, 1801

Electoral history[edit] Presidential elections[edit]

Election Candidate Running mate Votes Vote % Electoral votes +/- Outcome of election

1792 George Washington John Adams 28,579 100.0

132 / 132

New Victory

1796 John Adams Thomas Pinckney 35,726 53.4

71 / 138

New Victory

1800 Charles C. Pinckney 25,952 38.6

65 / 138

6 Lost

1804 Charles C. Pinckney Rufus King 38,919 27.2

14 / 176

51 Lost

1808 62,431 32.4

47 / 176

34 Lost

1812 DeWitt Clinton[a] Jared Ingersoll 132,781 47.6

89 / 217

42 Lost

1816 Rufus King[b] John E. Howard 34,740 30.9

34 / 217

55 Lost

1820 No candidate 17,465 16.2

0 / 232

34 Lost

^ While commonly labeled as the Federalist candidate, Clinton technically ran as a Democratic-Republican
Democratic-Republican
and was not nominated by the Federalist Party
Federalist Party
itself, the latter simply deciding not to field a candidate. This did not prevent endorsements from state Federalist parties (such as in Pennsylvania), but he received the endorsement from the New York state Democratic-Republicans as well. The Virginia state Federalist Party
Federalist Party
rejected the Clinton–Ingersoll ticket and instead nominated Rufus King
Rufus King
for President and William Richardson Davie for Vice President—this ticket earned 27% of the state vote and 2% of the national vote. ^ The Federalist caucus did not even bother to make a formal nomination, although many Federalists supported Rufus King.

Congressional election[edit]

United States House of Representatives

Election year No. of overall seats won +/– House Speaker

1794

47 / 105

New Jonathan Dayton

1796

57 / 106

10

1798

60 / 106

3 Theodore Sedgwick

1800

38 / 106

22 Nathaniel Macon

1802

39 / 142

1

1804

28 / 142

11

1806

26 / 142

2 Joseph Bradley Varnum

1808

48 / 142

22

1810

36 / 143

12 Henry Clay

1812

68 / 182

32

1814

64 / 183

4

1816

40 / 185

24

1818

26 / 186

14

1820

32 / 187

6 Philip Barbour

1822 Template:Ccomposition bar 8 Henry Clay

United States Senate

Election year No. of overall seats won +/– Senate President

1794/1795

20 / 30

New John Adams

1796/1797

21 / 32

1 Thomas Jefferson

1798/1799

22 / 32

1

1800/1801

17 / 32

5 Aaron Burr

1802/1803

9 / 32

8

1804/1805

7 / 34

2 George Clinton

1806/1807

6 / 34

1

1808/1809

8 / 34

2

1810/1811

7 / 34

1

1812/1813

8 / 36

1 Elbridge Gerry

1814/1815

11 / 36

3

1816/1817

13 / 36

2 Daniel D. Tompkins

1818/1819

9 / 42

4

1820/1821

4 / 46

5

1822/1823

5 / 48

1

See also[edit]

Blue light federalists Democratic-Republican
Democratic-Republican
Party Essex Junto Federalist Era First Party System List of political parties in the United States The Port Folio

References[edit]

^ a b Viereck, Peter (1956, 2006), Conservative Thinkers: From John Adams to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 87–95. ^ "Anti-Federalist vs. Federalist". Diffen.  ^ The Federalists were supporters of the Federal Government, so for a strong central government. ^ a b John P. Diggins (1994). Up from Communism. Columbia UP. p. 390. ISBN 9780231084895.  ^ Parades and the Politics of the Street: Festive Culture in the Early American Republic. Simon P. Newman, p. 163. ^ a b Chambers, Political Parties in a New Nation (1963). ^ Wood, Empire of Liberty: A history of the Early Republic, 1789–1815 (2009). ^ Formisano (2001). ^ Chambers, Parties in a New Nation, pp. 39–40. ^ Miller The Federalist Era
Federalist Era
1789–1801 (1960) pp 210–28. ^ John C. Miller, The Federalist Era
Federalist Era
1789–1801 (1960) pp 84–98 ^ After 1793–4, with the Terror in the French Revolution, "Democrat" became a negative term, until the middle of Madison's presidency; the Federalists continued to use it to describe their opponents. Robert A. Dahl, "James Madison: Republican or Democrat?." Perspectives on Politics 3#3 (2005): 439–448; Dumas Malone, Jefferson, 3:162. ^ Manning J. Dauer, The Adams Federalists, chapter 2. ^ L. Marx Renzulli, Maryland: the Federalist years p 142, 183, 295 ^ Leonard D. White, The Federalists. A Study in Administrative History (1948) p 123. ^ a b Miller, The Federalist Era
Federalist Era
1789–1801 (1960). ^ Eugene R. Sheridan, " Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson
and the Giles Resolutions," William and Mary Quarterly 49#4 (1992), pp. 589–608 in JSTOR ^ The Gazette of United States, September 5, 1792, in Charles A. Beard, Economic Origins of Jeffersonian Democracy. (1915) p. 231. ^ letter to John Wise in Francis N. Thorpe, ed "A Letter from Jefferson on the Political Parties, 1798," American Historical Review v.3#3 (April 1898) pp 488–89 in JSTOR ^ Kelly Olds, "Privatizing the church: disestablishment in Connecticut and Massachusetts." Journal of Political Economy (1994): 277–297. in JSTOR ^ Amanda Porterfield, Conceived in Doubt: Religion and Politics in the New American Nation (2012) ^ Jonathan J. Den Hartog, Patriotism and Piety: Federalist Politics and Religious Struggle in the New American Nation (2015). ^ Constance B. Schulz, "'Of Bigotry in Politics and Religion': Jefferson's Religion, the Federalist Press, and the Syllabus." The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 91#1 (1983): 73–91. in JSTOR ^ Cunningham (1957), 82. ^ Elkins and McKitrick, ch 8; Sharp (1993) p. 70 for quote ^ Elkins and McKitrick pp. 314–16 on Jefferson's favorable responses. ^ Marshall Smelser, "The Federalist Period as an Age of Passion," American Quarterly 10 (Winter 1958), 391–459. ^ Smelser, "The Jacobin Phrenzy: Federalism and the Menace of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity," Review of Politics 13 (1951) 457–82. ^ Elkins and McKitrick, Age of Federalism, pp 451–61 ^ Eugene R. Sheridan, "The Recall of Edmond Charles Genet: A Study in Transatlantic Politics and Diplomacy". Diplomatic History 18#4 (1994), 463–68. ^ Elkins and McKitrick, pp. 330–65. ^ Elkins and McKitrick, pp. 375–406. ^ Elkins and McKitrick, pp. 406–50. ^ Miller (1960) p. 149. ^ Todd Estes, "Shaping the politics of public opinion: Federalists and the Jay Treaty
Jay Treaty
debate." Journal of the Early Republic 20.3 (2000): 393–422. in JSTOR ^ Sharp 113–37. ^ Miller (1960) pp. 155–62 ^ "History of the Federal Judiciary".  ^ Carl E. Prince, "The Federalist Party
Federalist Party
and Creation of a Court Press, 1789–1801." Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 53#2 (1976): 238–41. ^ Si Sheppard, The Partisan Press: A History of Media Bias in the United States (2007). ^ Jeffrey L. Pasley. "The Tyranny of Printers": Newspaper Politics in the Early Republic (2001) ^ Donald H. Stewart, The Opposition Press of the Federalist Period (1969) ^ Lora, Ronald (1999). The Conservative Press in Eighteenth-and Nineteenth-century America. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 103–111. ISBN 0-313-31043-2.  ^ David Waldstreicher, In the midst of perpetual fetes: The making of American nationalism, 1776–1820 (1997). ^ Jürgen Heideking, "The federal processions of 1788 and the origins of American civil religion." Soundings (1994): 367–387. in JSTOR ^ Len Travers, "Hurrah for the Fourth: Patriotism, Politics, and Independence Day in Federalist Boston, 1783–1818." Essex Institute Historical Collections 125: 129–161. ^ Kevin Coe, et al. The Rhetoric of American Civil Religion: Symbols, Sinners, and Saints (Lexington Books, 2016). ^ Bernard A. Weisberger, America afire: Jefferson, Adams, and the first contested election (Perennial, 2001). ^ Philip J. Lampi, "The Federalist Party
Federalist Party
Resurgence, 1808–1816: Evidence from the New Nation Votes Database." Journal of the Early Republic 33.2 (2013): 255–281. ^ Richard H. Kohn, Eagle and sword: The Federalists and the creation of the military establishment in America, 1783–1802 (1975). ^ James Morton Smith, "President John Adams, Thomas Cooper, and Sedition: A Case Study in Suppression" Mississippi Valley Historical Review (1955) 42#3 pp. 438–465 in JSTOR. ^ Marc A. Franklin, David A. Anderson, & Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Mass Media Law (7th ed. 2005). ^ a b Manning Dauer, The Adams Federalists (Johns Hopkins UP, 1953). ^ Brian Phillips Murphy, "' A Very Convenient Instrument': The Manhattan Company, Aaron Burr, and the Election of 1800." William and Mary Quarterly 65.2 (2008): 233–266. ^ Miller, John C. "The Federalist Era
Federalist Era
1789–1801" (1960) ^ "Thomas Jefferson: First Inaugural Address. U.S. Inaugural Addresses. 1989".  ^ Susan Dunn, Jefferson's second revolution: The Election Crisis of 1800 and the Triumph of Republicanism (2004) ^ Elisha P. Douglass, "Fisher Ames, Spokesman for New England Federalism." Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society
American Philosophical Society
103.5 (1959): 693–715. in JSTOR ^ Russell Kirk, The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot (2001). p. 83 ^ Fisher Ames, letter of October 26, 1803, Works, p. 483. As cited in Kirk, The Conservative Mind p. 83. ^ David H. Fischer, "The Myth of the Essex Junto." William and Mary Quarterly (1964): 191–235. ^ Lampi, "The Federalist Party
Federalist Party
Resurgence," p 259 ^ Google Books. ^ Richard J. Purcell, Connecticut in Transition: 1775–1818 1963. p. 190. ^ Jerry W. Knudson, "The Jeffersonian Assault on the Federalist Judiciary, 1802–1805; Political Forces and Press Reaction." American Journal of Legal History 14.1 (1970): 55–75. in JSTOR ^ Lampi, "The Federalist Party
Federalist Party
Resurgence," ^ James M. Banner, To the Hartford Convention: The Federalists and the origins of party politics in Massachusetts, 1789–1815 (1970). ^ Kenneth E. Shewmaker, '"This Unblessed War': Daniel Webster's Opposition to the War of 1812" Historical New Hampshire 53#1 (1998) pp 21–45 ^ William Alexander Robinson, "The Washington
Washington
Benevolent Society in New England: a phase of politics during the War of 1812", Proceedings of the Massachusetts
Massachusetts
Historical Society (1916) vol 49 pp 274ff. ^ Joseph F. Stoltz, "'It Taught our Enemies a Lesson:' The Battle of New Orleans and the Republican Destruction of the Federalist Party." Tennessee Historical Quarterly 71#2 (2012): 112–127. in JSTOR ^ Samuel Eliot Morison, Harrison Gray Otis, 1765–1848: the urbane Federalist (2nd ed. 1969) pages x–xi ^ Patrick Allitt, The Conservatives (2009) p 26 ^ Chernow (2004) ^ Shaw Livermore, Jr., The Twilight of Federalism: The Disintegration of the Federalist Party
Federalist Party
1815–1830 (1962) ^ Robert Vincent Remini (1997). Daniel Webster: The Man and His Time. W. W. Norton. pp. 94–95. ISBN 9780393045529.  ^ James H. Broussard (1978). The Southern Federalists: 1800–1816. LSU Press. p. 274. ISBN 9780807125205.  ^ Lynn Parsons (2009). The Birth of Modern Politics : Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, and the Election of 1828: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, and the Election of 1828. Oxford University Press. p. 164. ISBN 9780199718504.  ^ John Joseph Lalor. Cyclopedia of Political Science, Political Economy, and the Political History of the United States (1881). ^ Hans Sperber and Travis Trittschuh. American Political Terms: An Historical Dictionary (1962). p. 150. ^ Paul Finkelman,"Federalist Party" in Robert A. Rutland, ed. James Madison and the American Nation 1751-1836: An Encyclopedia (1994) pp 144–145.

Bibliography[edit]

Ben-Atar, Doron S., and Liz B. MacMillan, eds. Federalists Reconsidered (1999). Banner, James M. (1970). To the Hartford Convention: The Federalists and the Origins of Party Politics in Massachusetts, 1789–1815.  Beeman, Richard R. (1972). The Old Dominion and the New Nation, 1788–1801.  Broussard, James H. (1978). The Southern Federalists: 1800–1816.  Buel, Richard, Jr. (1972). Securing the Revolution: Ideology in American Politics, 1789–1815. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-8014-0705-2.  Chambers, William Nisbet. Political Parties in a New Nation: The American Experience, 1776–1809 (1963). William Chambers, ed., ed. (1972). The First Party System: Federalists and Republicans. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-14340-5. CS1 maint: Extra text: editors list (link) Chernow, Ron (2004). Alexander Hamilton. Penguin Books. ISBN 1-59420-009-2.  Chernow, Ron. Washington: A Life (2010). Cunningham, Noble E., Jr. (1965). The Making of the American Party System 1789 to 1809.  Elkins, Stanley and Eric McKitrick. The Age of Federalism - The Early American Republic, 1788 - 1800 (1990). A major scholarly survey; online free. Ferling, John. John Adams: A Life (1992). Fischer, David Hackett (1965). The Revolution of American Conservatism: The Federalist Party
Federalist Party
in the Era of Jeffersonian Democracy.  Formisano, Ronald (1983). The Transformation of Political Culture: Massachusetts
Massachusetts
Parties, 1790s–1840s.  Formisano, Ronald P. "State Development in the Early Republic", in Boyd Shafer and Anthony Badger, eds. Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775–2000, (2001) pp. 7–35. Fox, Dixon Ryan (1919). The Decline of Aristocracy in the Politics of New York, 1801–1840. Longmans, Green & Co., agents. ASIN B000863CHY.  Hartog, Jonathan J. Den. Patriotism and Piety: Federalist Politics and Religious Struggle in the New American Nation (University of Virginia Press; 2015) 280 pages. Hickey, Donald R. " Federalist Party
Federalist Party
Unity and the War of 1812". Journal of American Studies (1978) 12#1 pp. 23–39. vol 4 of Richard Hildreth, History of the United States (1851) covering 1790s. Humphrey, Carol Sue (1996). The Press of the Young Republic, 1783–1833.  Jensen, Richard. "Federalist Party," in Encyclopedia of Third Parties (M E Sharpe, 2000). Knudson, Jerry W. Jefferson and the Press: Crucible of Liberty (2006) how 4 Republican and 4 Federalist newspapers covered election of 1800; Thomas Paine; Louisiana Purchase; Hamilton-Burr duel; impeachment of Chase; and the embargo. Lampi, Philip J. "The Federalist Party
Federalist Party
Resurgence, 1808–1816: Evidence from the New Nation Votes Database". Journal of the Early Republic 33#2 (2013). pp. 255–281. online. McCormick, Richard P. (1966). The Second Party System: Party Formation in the Jacksonian Era.  details the collapse state by state. McCullough, David (2002). John Adams. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0-7432-2313-6.  McDonald, Forrest (1974). The Presidency of George Washington. University Press of Kansas. ISBN 0-7006-0110-4.  Mason, Matthew, "Federalists, Abolitionists, and the Problem of Influence", American Nineteenth Century History 10 (March 2009), pp. 1–27. Miller, John C. (1960). The Federalist Era: 1789–1801. Harper. ISBN 1-57766-031-5.  scholarly online free. Mitchell, Broadus (1962). Alexander Hamilton: The National Adventure, 1788–1804. McMillan.  Morison, Samuel Eliot. Harrison Gray Otis, 1765–1848: The Urbane Federalist (1969). Jeffrey L. Pasley, et al. eds., ed. (2004). Beyond the Founders: New Approaches to the Political History of the Early American Republic. CS1 maint: Extra text: editors list (link) Norman Risjord, ed., ed. (1969). The Early American Party System. Harper & Row. CS1 maint: Extra text: editors list (link) Risjord, Norman K. "The Virginia Federalists", Journal of Southern History Vol. 33, No. 4 (November 1967), pp. 486–517 in JSTOR. Sharp, James Rogers (1993). American Politics in the Early Republic: The New Nation in Crisis. Yale University Press. , detailed political history of 1790s. Sheehan, Colleen. "Madison v. Hamilton: The Battle Over Republicanism and the Role of Public Opinion" American Political Science Review 2004 98(3): 405–424. in JSTOR. Siemers, David J. Ratifying the Republic: Antifederalists and Federalists in Constitutional Time (2002). Smelser, Marshall (1968). The Democratic Republic 1801–1815.  general survey. Theriault, Sean M. "Party Politics during the Louisiana Purchase", Social Science History 2006 30(2) pp. 293–324; doi:10.1215/01455532-30-2-293. Tinkcom, Harry M. (1950). The Republicans and Federalists in Pennsylvania, 1790–1801.  Viereck, Peter (1956, 2006) Conservative Thinkers from John Adams
John Adams
to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, NJ. Transaction Publishers. Waldstreicher, David. "The Nationalization and Racialization of American Politics: 1790–1840", in Boyd Shafer and Anthony Badger, eds. Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775–2000, (2001) pp. 37–83. Wood, Gordon S. Empire of Liberty: A history of the Early Republic, 1789–1815 (2009).

External links[edit]

Media related to Federalist Party
Federalist Party
(United States) at Wikimedia Commons A New Nation Votes: American Election Returns 1787–1825

v t e

National political parties in the United States

List of political parties in the United States

Major parties

Democratic Republican

Third parties

Larger 1

Green Libertarian Constitution

Smaller 2

African People's Socialist All-African People's Revolutionary America's American (1969) American Delta American Freedom American Party of Labor American Populist American Reform American Solidarity Black
Black
Riders Liberation Christian Liberty Citizens Communist Freedom Road Socialist Freedom Socialist Humane Independent American Justice Legal Marijuana Now Marijuana Modern Whig National Socialist Movement New Afrikan Black
Black
Panther New Black
Black
Panther Objectivist Pacifist Peace and Freedom Pirate Progressive Labor Prohibition Reform Revolutionary Communist Socialism and Liberation Socialist (1973) Socialist Action Socialist Alternative Socialist Equality Socialist Workers Traditionalist Worker Unity Veterans Working Families Workers World World Socialist

Former parties

America First American (Know Nothing) American (1924) American Falangist American Nazi American Vegetarian Americans Elect Anti-Masonic Black
Black
Panther Boston Tea Citizens Commonwealth Land Constitution (1952) Constitutional Union Democratic-Republican Farmer–Labor Federalist Free Soil Gold Democrats Greenback Independence (2007) Labor (1919) Labor (1996) Liberal Republican Liberty National Republican National Socialist National States' Rights National Union (1864) Natural Law New Alliance New Union Nullifier Opposition Populist (People's) Personal Choice Progressive (1912) Progressive (1924) Progressive (1948) Radical Democracy Raza Unida Readjuster Silver Silver Republican Socialist (1901) Socialist Labor States Rights (Dixiecrat) Unconditional Union Union (1936) Unionist (1850s/60s) U.S. Labor Whig Youth International

1 Recognized as a major national party by the FEC 2 Not recognized as a major national party by the FEC

State and local political parties (without national body) Presidential nominating conventions Politics of the United States Politics portal

v t e

Alexander Hamilton

Senior Officer of the United States Army, 1799–1800 1st Secretary of the Treasury, 1789–1795 Delegate, Congress of the Confederation, 1782–1783, 1788–1789

United States founding events

A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress (1774) The Farmer Refuted (1775) Delegate, 1786 Annapolis Convention Delegate, 1787 Constitutional Convention Initiated, main author, The Federalist Papers

written by Hamilton

Founding Father

Secretary of the Treasury

First Bank of the United States Revenue Marine (United States Coast Guard) United States Customs Service Hamiltonian economic program Residence Act

Compromise of 1790

"First Report on the Public Credit", 1790 Funding Act of 1790 "Operations of the Act Laying Duties on Imports", 1790 "Second Report on Public Credit", a.k.a. "Report on a National Bank", 1790 "Report On Manufactures", 1791 Tariff of 1790 Tariff of 1792 Coinage Act of 1792

United States Mint

Whiskey Rebellion Jay Treaty

Military career

New York Provincial Company of Artillery In the Revolutionary War Battles: Harlem Heights White
White
Plains Trenton General Washington's Aide-de-Camp Princeton Brandywine Germantown Monmouth Siege of Yorktown

Other events

Burr–Hamilton duel Founder, Federalist Party

Federalist Era

Founder, Bank of New York Bank of North America Advisor, George Washington's Farewell Address President-General of the Society of the Cincinnati Founder, New-York Evening Post Hamilton–Reynolds sex scandal Rutgers v. Waddington Relationship with slavery

Depictions and memorials

Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
(Fraser statue) Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
(Ceracchi bust) Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
(Conrads statue) Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
(Trumbull portrait) Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
Bridge Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
High School (Los Angeles) Fort Hamilton Hamilton Grange National Memorial Hamilton Hall (Columbia University) Hamilton Hall (Salem, Massachusetts) Hamilton Heights, Manhattan Hamilton, Ohio Hamilton-Oneida Academy Postage stamps Trinity Church Cemetery United States ten-dollar bill

Media and popular culture

Hamilton (2015 musical) Hamilton (1917 play) Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
(1931 film) Liberty! (1997 documentary series) Liberty's Kids
Liberty's Kids
(2002 animated series) John Adams
John Adams
(2008 miniseries)

Related

Age of Enlightenment American Enlightenment American Philosophical Society Liberty Hall (New Jersey) New York Manumission Society

African Free School

"American System" economic plan

American School

American Revolution

patriots

Family

Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton

wife Schuyler family

Philip Hamilton
Philip Hamilton
(oldest son) Angelica Hamilton
Angelica Hamilton
(daughter) Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
Jr. (son) James Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
(son) John Church Hamilton
John Church Hamilton
(son) William S. Hamilton (son) Eliza Hamilton Holly
Eliza Hamilton Holly
(daughter) Philip Hamilton
Philip Hamilton
(youngest son) Schuyler Hamilton
Schuyler Hamilton
(grandson) Alexander Hamilton
Alexander Hamilton
Jr. (grandson) Allan McLane Hamilton
Allan McLane Hamilton
(grandson) Robert Ray Hamilton (great-grandson)

v t e

John Adams

2nd President of the United States, 1797–1801 1st Vice President of the United States, 1789–1797 U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom, 1785–1788 U.S. Ambassador to the Netherlands, 1782–1788 Delegate, Second Continental Congress, 1775–1778 Delegate, First Continental Congress, 1774

Founding of the United States

Braintree Instructions (1765) Boston Massacre defense Continental Association Novanglus; A History of the Dispute with America, From Its Origin in 1754 to the Present Time (1775) Thoughts on Government
Thoughts on Government
(1776) Declaration of Independence

May 15 preamble Committee of Five

Model Treaty

Treaty of Amity and Commerce Treaty of Alliance

Board of War Chairman of the Marine Committee, 1775-1779

Continental Navy

Staten Island Peace Conference

Conference House

Constitution of Massachusetts
Massachusetts
(1780) Treaty of Paris, 1783

Presidency

Inauguration Quasi War
Quasi War
with France

XYZ Affair Commerce Protection Act United States Marine Corps Convention of 1800

Alien and Sedition Acts

Naturalization Act of 1798

Navy Department Library Treaty of Tellico Treaty of Tripoli Midnight Judges Act

Marbury v. Madison

State of the Union Address (1797 1798 1799 1800) Cabinet Federal judiciary appointments

Other writings

Massachusetts
Massachusetts
Historical Society holdings

Adams Papers Editorial Project

Life and homes

Early life and education Adams National Historical Park

John Adams
John Adams
Birthplace Family home and John Quincy Adams
John Quincy Adams
birthplace Peacefield Presidential Library

Massachusetts
Massachusetts
Hall, Harvard University Presidents House, Philadelphia Co-founder and second president, American Academy of Arts and Sciences United First Parish Church and gravesite

Elections

United States presidential election 1788–1789 1792 1796 1800

Legacy

Adams House at Harvard University John Adams
John Adams
Building U.S. Postage stamps Adams Memorial

Popular culture

Profiles in Courage (1964 series) American Primitive (1969 play) 1776 (1969 musical 1972 film) The Adams Chronicles (1976 miniseries) Liberty! (1997 documentary series) Liberty's Kids
Liberty's Kids
(2002 animated series) John Adams
John Adams
(2001 book 2008 miniseries) Sons of Liberty (2015 miniseries)

Related

"Adams and Liberty" campaign song Adams' personal library American Enlightenment Congress Hall Federalist Party

Federalist Era First Party System republicanism

American Philosophical Society Gazette of the United States The American Museum American Revolution

patriots

Family

Abigail Adams

wife Quincy family

Abigail Adams
Abigail Adams
Smith (daughter) John Quincy Adams

son presidency

Charles Adams (son) Thomas Boylston Adams (son) George W. Adams (grandson) Charles Adams Sr. (grandson) John Adams
John Adams
II (grandson) John Q. Adams (great-grandson) Henry Adams
Henry Adams
(great-grandson) Brooks Adams
Brooks Adams
(great-grandson) John Adams
John Adams
Sr. (father) Susanna Boylston (mother) Elihu Adams (brother) Samuel Adams
Samuel Adams
(second cousin) Louisa Adams

daughter-in-law First Lady

← George Washington Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson

.