In predicate logic, existential generalization (also known as existential introduction, ∃I) is a valid rule of inference that allows one to move from a specific statement, or one instance, to a quantified generalized statement, or existential proposition. In first-order logic, it is often used as a rule for the existential quantifier (∃) in formal proofs. Example: "Rover loves to wag his tail. Therefore, something loves to wag its tail." In the Fitch-style calculus:
Q ( a ) → ∃
Q ( x )
displaystyle Q(a)to exists x ,Q(x)
Where a replaces all free instances of x within Q(x). Quine Universal instantiation and Existential Generalization are two aspects of a single principle, for instead of saying that "∀x x=x" implies "Socrates=Socrates", we could as well say that the denial "Socrates≠Socrates"' implies "∃x x≠x". The principle embodied in these two operations is the link between quantifications and the singular statements that are related to them as instances. Yet it is a principle only by courtesy. It holds only in the case where a term names and, furthermore, occurs referentially. See also
^ Copi, Irving M.; Cohen, Carl (2005). Introduction to Logic. Prentice
^ Hurley, Patrick (1991). A Concise Introduction to
This logic-related article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.