Dutch phonology

Dutch phonology is similar to that of other West Germanic languages, especially Afrikaans and West Frisian.

Standard Dutch has two main ''de facto'' pronunciation standards: Northern and Belgian. Northern Standard Dutch is the most prestigious accent in the Netherlands. It is associated with high status, education and wealth. Even though its speakers seem to be concentrated mostly in the densely populated Randstad area in the provinces of North Holland, South Holland and Utrecht, it is often impossible to tell where in the country its speakers were born or brought up, so it cannot be considered a regional dialect within the Netherlands. Belgian Standard Dutch is used by the vast majority of Flemish journalists, which is why it is sometimes called ''VRT-Nederlands'' ("VRT Dutch"; formerly ''BRT-Nederlands'' "BRT Dutch"), after VRT, the national public-service broadcaster for the Flemish Region.

Consonants

The following table shows the consonant phonemes of Dutch:

Obstruents

* The glottal stop is not phonemic because it only occurs in a few specific predictable environments—namely, before vowel-initial syllables within words after e.g. , , , , , , and and often also at the beginning of a word.
* Apart from , all alveolar consonants are laminal and can be realized as denti-alveolar in Belgium.
* and are fully voiced.
* is not a native phoneme of Dutch and occurs only in borrowed words, like ''goal'' ('goal'); however is nevertheless analyzed as a phoneme because minimal pairs exist—e.g. ''goal'' and ''kool'' ('cabbage'). Additionally, in native words, occurs as an allophone of when it undergoes regressive voicing assimilation, like in ''zakdoek'' .
* In the north, often devoices and merges with ; the quality of that merged sound has been variously described as:
** Voiceless post-velar fricative trill which, before , can be fronted to ;
** Voiceless post-velar or uvular fricative.
* In the south, the distinction between and is generally preserved as velar or post-palatal . Some southern speakers may alternate between the velar and post-palatal articulation, depending on the backness of the preceding or succeeding vowel. Velar, post-velar and uvular variants are called ''harde g'' "hard g", while the post-palatal variants are called ''zachte g'' "soft g". There is also a third variant called ''zwakke harde g'' "weak hard g", in which is realized as and is realized as and is used in Zeeland and West Flanders, which are h-dropping areas, so that does not merge with glottal variants of and .
* In the Netherlands, can devoice and merge with . According to , there are hardly any speakers of Northern Standard Dutch who consistently contrast with .
* In low-prestige varieties of Netherlandic Dutch (such as the Amsterdam accent) also can devoice and merge with .
* Speakers who devoice and may also hypercorrectively voice and : ''concert'' "concert" may thus be compared to the more usual .
* Some speakers pronounce as a voiceless . Some dialects, particularly those from the southwest, exhibit h-dropping.
* In the Netherlands, and may have only mid-to-low pitched friction, and for many Netherlandic speakers, they are retracted. In Belgium, they are more similar to English .
* The sequences and are often assimilated to palatalized , alveolo-palatal , postalveolar or similar realizations.
* The onset sequence is commonly realized as a tenuis alveolo-palatal affricate , or intervocalically as a stop or fricative , barring some loanwords and names.
* Before , is realized as a voiceless post-palatal affricate .
* are not native phonemes of Dutch and usually occur only in borrowed words, like ''show'' and ''bagage'' "baggage". Depending on the speaker and the position in the word, they may or may not be distinct from the assimilated realisations of the clusters . If they are not distinct, they will have the same range of realisations noted above.
* Unlike English and German, in Dutch the voiceless stops are unaspirated in all positions: thus while English ''tip'' and German are both , Dutch is with an unaspirated .

Sonorants

* and assimilate their articulation to a following obstruent in many cases:
** Both become before , and before .
** merges into before velars (). The realisation of , in turn, depends on how a following velar fricative is realised. For example, it will be uvular for speakers who realise as uvulars.
** is realised as before . That occurs also before or and, under assimilation, before and .
* The exact pronunciation of varies regionally:
** In the North, is 'clear' before vowels and 'dark' before consonants and pauses. Intervocalic tends to be clear except after the open back vowels . However, some speakers use the dark variant in all intervocalic contexts.
** Some accents, such as the Amsterdam and the Rotterdam ones, have dark in all positions. Conversely, some accents in the eastern regions, along the German border (for example around Nijmegen), as well as some Standard Belgian speakers, have clear in all contexts.
** The quality of dark varies; in the North it is pharyngealized , but in a final position, many speakers produce a strongly pharyngealized vocoid with no alveolar contact () instead. In Belgium, it is either velarized or post-palatalized .
* The realization of phoneme varies considerably from dialect to dialect and even between speakers in the same dialect area:
** The historically original pronunciation is an alveolar trill , with the alveolar tap as a common allophone.
** The uvular trill is a common alternative, found particularly in the central and southern dialect areas. Uvular pronunciations appear to be gaining ground in the Randstad. Syllable-finally, it may be vocalized to , much as in German. This is more common in the (south)eastern areas ( Limburg, southeast Brabantian, Overijssel).
** The coastal dialects of South Holland produce a voiced uvular fricative .
** The velar bunched approximant (the ''Gooise R'', which sounds similar to the retroflex approximant) is found at the end of a syllable in the pronunciation of some speakers in the Netherlands, especially those from the Randstad, but not in Belgium. Its use has been increasing in recent years.
* The realization of also varies by area (and less so by speaker):
** The main realisation is a labiodental approximant , found in central and northern Netherlands.
** Speakers in southern Netherlands and Belgium use a bilabial approximant . It is like but without velarization.
** In Suriname and among immigrant populations, is usual.
* An epenthetic may be inserted between and word-final . Thus ''melk'' "milk" may be pronounced . This may extend to compounds, e.g. ''melkboer'' "milkman". Although this pronunciation is mistakenly thought of as non-standard, it is found in all types of Dutch, including the standard varieties. There is also another type of -insertion that occurs word-medially (e.g. ''helpen'' "to help"), which is considered non-standard.

In many areas the final 'n' of the ending ''-en'' (originally , with a variety of meanings) is pronounced only when a word is being individually stressed; this makes ''-en'' words homophonous with otherwise identical forms ending in ''-e'' alone. The ''-n'' is dropped both word-finally and, in compound words, word-internally. This pronunciation can be morphologically sensitive and serve to distinguish words, since the ''-n'' is dropped only when it is part of the distinct ending ''-en'' and not when the word consists of an indivisible stem which happens to end in ''-en''. Thus, the ''teken'' of ''ik teken'' ('I draw') always retains its ''-n'' because it is part of an indivisible stem whereas in ''teken'' ('ticks') it is dropped because it is part of a plural ending. Such pairs (''teken'' = 'draw'; ''teken'' = 'ticks') are therefore not homophones in dialects that drop ''-n'', despite being written identically.

Final ''-n'' is retained in the North East (Low Saxon) and the South West (East and West Flemish), where it is the schwa that disappears instead. This creates a syllabic or (after velars) syllabic sounds: ''laten'' ; ''maken'' . Some Low Saxon dialects that have uvular pronunciations of and (or one of them) also have a syllabic uvular nasal, like in ''lagen'' and/or ''lachen''

Final devoicing and assimilation

Dutch devoices all obstruents at the ends of words, as is partly reflected in the spelling. The voiced "z" in plural ''huizen'' becomes ''huis'' ('house') in singular. Also, ''duiven'' becomes ''duif'' ('dove'). The other cases are always written with the voiced consonant, but a devoiced one is actually pronounced: the "d" in plural ''baarden'' is retained in singular spelling ''baard'' ('beard'), but the pronunciation of the latter is , and plural ''ribben'' has singular ''rib'' ('rib'), pronounced .

Because of assimilation, the initial of the next word is often also devoiced: ''het vee'' ('the cattle') is . The opposite may be true for other consonants: ''ik ben'' ('I am') .

Example words for consonants

Vowels

Dutch has an extensive vowel inventory consisting of thirteen plain vowels and at least three diphthongs. Vowels can be grouped as front unrounded, front rounded, central and back. They are also traditionally distinguished by length or tenseness. The vowels are included in one of the diphthong charts further below because Northern Standard Dutch realizes them as diphthongs, but they behave phonologically like the other long monophthongs.

Monophthongs

* Dutch vowels can be classified as lax and tense, checked and free or short and long. Phonetically however, the close vowels are as short as the phonological lax/short vowels unless they occur before .
* Phonologically, can be classified as either close or close-mid. Carlos Gussenhoven classifies them as the former, whereas Geert Booij says that they are the latter and classifies and the non-native mid vowels as open-mid.
* has been traditionally transcribed with , but modern sources tend to use or instead. Beverley Collins and Inger Mees write this vowel with .
* The phonemic status of is not clear. Phonetically, a vowel of the type appears before nasals as an allophone of , e.g. in ''jong'' ('young'). This vowel can also be found in certain other words, such as ''op'' ('on'), which can form a near-minimal pair with ''mop'' ('joke'). This, however, is subject to both individual and geographical variation.
* Many speakers feel that and belong to the same phoneme, with being its unstressed variant. This is reflected in spelling errors produced by Dutch children, for example for ''binnen'' ('inside'). Adding to this, the two vowels have different phonological distribution; for example, can occur word-finally, while (along with other lax vowels) cannot. In addition, the word-final allophone of is a close-mid front vowel with some rounding , a sound that is similar to .
* The native tense vowels are long in stressed syllables and short elsewhere. The non-native oral vowels appear only in stressed syllables and thus are always long.
* The native as well as the non-native nasal are sometimes transcribed without the length marks, as .
* , a phonological back vowel, is central or front in Standard Dutch.
* The non-native occur only in stressed syllables. In unstressed syllables, they are replaced by the closest native vowel. For instance, verbs corresponding to the nouns ''analyse'' ('analysis'), ''centrifuge'' ('spinner'), and ''zone'' ('zone') are ''analyseren'' ('to analyze'), ''centrifugeren'' ('to spin-dry'), and ''zoneren'' ('to divide into zones').
* is extremely rare, and the only words of any frequency in which it occurs are ''oeuvre'' , ''manoeuvre'' and ''freule''. In the more common words, tends to be replaced with the native , whereas can be replaced by either or (Belgians typically select the latter).
* The non-native nasal vowels occur only in loanwords from French. are often nativized as , or , depending on the place of articulation of the following consonant. For instance, ''restaurant'' ('restaurant') and ''pardon'' ('excuse me') are often nativized as and , respectively. is extremely rare, just like its oral counterpartIt is listed by only some sources, namely and . and the only word of any frequency in which it occurs is ''parfum'' ('perfume'), often nativized as or .
* The non-native is listed only by some sources. It occurs in words such as ''cast'' ('cast').

The following sections describe the phonetic quality of Dutch monophthongs in detail.

Close vowels

* is close to the canonical value of the IPA symbol . The Standard Belgian realization has also been described as close-mid . In regional Standard Dutch, the realization may be different: for example, in Antwerp it is closer, more like , whereas in places like Dordrecht, Nijmegen, West and East Flanders the vowel is typically more open than the Standard Dutch counterpart, more like . Affected speakers of Northern Standard Dutch may also use this vowel.
* are close front , close to cardinal .
* The majority of sources consider to be close-mid central ,, cited in . yet Beverley Collins and Inger Mees consider it to be close-mid front . The study conducted by Vincent van Heuven and Roos Genet has shown that native speakers consider the canonical IPA value of the symbol to be the most similar to the Dutch sound, much more similar than the canonical values of and (the sound represented by was not a part of the study). In regional Standard Dutch may be raised to near-close , for example in Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague. In Antwerp, the vowel may be as high as and the two vowels may differ in nothing but length. A more open vowel of the -type is found in southern accents (e.g. in Bruges) and in affected Northern Standard Dutch.
* have been variously described as close front , near-close front and, in Northern Standard Dutch, near-close central .
* are close back in Northern Standard Dutch and close near-back in Belgian Standard Dutch and some varieties of regional Standard Dutch spoken in Antwerp and Flemish Brabant.

Word-final are raised and end in a voiceless vowel: . The voiceless vowel in the first sequence may sound almost like a palatal fricative .

are frequently longer in Belgian Standard Dutch and most Belgian accents than in Northern Standard Dutch, in which the length of these vowels is identical to that of lax vowels.

Regardless of the exact accent, are mandatorily lengthened to before in the same word. In Northern Standard Dutch and in Randstad, these are laxed to and often have a schwa-like off-glide (). This means that before , are less strongly differentiated from in Northern Standard Dutch and Randstad than is usually the case in other regional varieties of Standard Dutch and in Belgian Standard Dutch. There is one exception to the lengthening rule: when is followed by a consonant different than and , remain short. Examples of that are words such as ''wierp'' , ''Duisburg'' (alternatively: , with a lax vowel) and ''stierf'' . The rule is also suppressed syllable-finally in certain compounds; compare ''roux-room'' with ''roerroom'' and ''Ruhr-Ohm'' .

Mid vowels

* are open-mid front . According to Jo Verhoeven, the Belgian Standard Dutch variants are somewhat raised. Before and the velarized or pharyngealized allophone of , is typically lowered to . In some regional Standard Dutch (e.g. in Dordrecht, Ghent, Bruges and more generally in Zeeland, North Brabant and Limburg), this lowering is generalized to most or even all contexts. Conversely, some regional Standard Dutch varieties (e.g. much of Randstad Dutch, especially the Amsterdam dialect as well as the accent of Antwerp) realize the main allophone of as higher and more central than open-mid front ().
* is open-mid front .
* has two allophones, with the main one being mid central unrounded . The allophone used in word-final positions resembles the main allophone of as it is closer, more front and more rounded ().
* is open-mid back rounded . Collins and Mees (2003) describe it as "very tense", with pharyngealization and strong lip-rounding. There is considerable regional and individual variation in the height of , with allophones being as close as in certain words. The closed allophones are especially common in the Randstad area. is close to in terms of height and backness.

are typically somewhat lengthened and centralized before in Northern Standard Dutch and Randstad, usually with a slight schwa-like offglide: . In addition, in this position is somewhat less rounded () than the main allophone of .

The free vowels are realized as monophthongs in Belgian Standard Dutch (Jo Verhoeven describes the Belgian Standard Dutch realization of as mid central ) and in many regional accents. In Northern Standard Dutch, narrow closing diphthongs are used. The starting point of is centralized back (), and the starting point of has been described as front by Collins and Mees and as centralized front by Gussenhoven. The monophthongal counterparts of are peripheral; the former is almost as front as cardinal , whereas the latter is almost as back as cardinal . Many speakers of Randstad Dutch as well as younger speakers of Northern Standard Dutch realize as rather wide diphthongs of the type, which may be mistaken for the phonemic diphthongs by speakers of other accents. Using for goes hand in hand with lowering the first elements of to , a phenomenon termed ''Polder Dutch''. Therefore, the phonemic contrast between and is still strongly maintained, but its phonetic realization is very different from what one can typically hear in traditional Northern Standard Dutch. In Rotterdam and The Hague, the starting point of can be fronted to instead of being lowered to .

In Northern Standard Dutch and in Randstad, lose their closing glides and are raised and slightly centralized to (often with a schwa-like off-glide ) before in the same word. The first two allophones strongly resemble the lax monophthongs . Dutch children frequently misspell the word ''weer'' ('again') as ''wir''. These sounds may also occur in regional varieties of Standard Dutch and in Belgian Standard Dutch, but they are more typically the same as the main allophones of (that is, ). An exception to the centralizing rule are syllable-final in compounds such as ''zeereis'' ('sea voyage'), ''milieuramp'' ('environmental disaster') and ''bureauredactrice'' ('desk editor (f.)').

In Northern Standard Dutch, are mid-centralized before the pharyngealized allophone of .

Several non-standard dialects have retained the distinction between the so-called "sharp-long" and "soft-long" ''e'' and ''o'', a distinction that dates to early Middle Dutch. The sharp-long varieties originate from the Old Dutch long ''ē'' and ''ō'' (Proto-Germanic ''ai'' and ''au''), while the soft-long varieties arose from short ''i''/''e'' and ''u''/''o'' that were lengthened in open syllables in early Middle Dutch. The distinction is not considered to be a part of Standard Dutch and is not recognised in educational materials, but it is still present in many local varieties, such as Antwerpian, Limburgish, West Flemish and Zeelandic. In these varieties, the sharp-long vowels are often opening diphthongs such as , while the soft-long vowels are either plain monophthongs or slightly closing .

Open vowels

In Northern Standard Dutch and some other accents, are realised so that the former is a back vowel , whereas the latter is central or front . In Belgian Standard Dutch is also central or front, but may be central instead of back , so it may have the same backness as .

Other accents may have different realisations:
* Many accents (Amsterdam, Utrecht, Antwerp) realize this pair with 'inverted' backness, so that is central (or, in the case of Utrecht, even front ), whereas is closer to cardinal .
* Outside the Randstad, fronting of to central is very common. On the other hand, in Rotterdam and Leiden, the short sounds even ''darker'' than the Standard Northern realization, being realized as a fully back and raised open vowel, unrounded or rounded .
* In Groningen, tends to be particularly front, similar to the quality of the cardinal vowel , whereas in The Hague and in the affected Standard Northern accent, may be raised and fronted to , particularly before .

Before , is typically a slight centering diphthong with a centralized first element () in Northern Standard Dutch and in Randstad.

Diphthongs

Dutch also has several diphthongs, but only three of them are indisputably phonemic. All of them end in a non-syllabic close vowel (henceforth written for simplicity), but they may begin with a variety of other vowels.

* has been variously transcribed with , , and .
* The starting points of tend to be closer () in Belgian Standard Dutch than in Northern Standard Dutch (). In addition, the Belgian Standard Dutch realization of tends to be fully rounded, unlike the typical Northern Standard Dutch realization of the vowel. However, Jo Verhoeven reports rather open starting points of the Belgian Standard Dutch variants of (), so the main difference between Belgian and Northern Standard Dutch in that regard may be only in the rounding of the first element of , but the fully rounded variant of is also used by some Netherlands speakers, particularly of the older generation. It is also used in most of Belgium, in agreement with the Belgian Standard Dutch realization.
* In conservative Northern Standard Dutch, the starting points of are open-mid and rounded in the case of the last two vowels: .
* The backness of the starting point of the Belgian Standard Dutch realization of has been variously described as front and centralized front .
* In ''Polder Dutch'' spoken in some areas of the Netherlands (especially Randstad and its surroundings), the starting points of are further lowered to . This typically goes hand in hand with lowering the starting points of to . These realizations have existed in Hollandic dialects since the 16th century and now are becoming standard in the Netherlands. They are an example of a chain shift akin to the Great Vowel Shift. According to Jan Stroop, the fully lowered variant of is the same as the phonetic diphthong , making ''bij'' 'at' and ''baai'' 'bay' perfect homophones.
* The rounding of the starting point of the Northern Standard Dutch realization of has been variously described as slight and nonexistent . The unrounded variant has also been reported to occur in many other accents, for example Leiden, Rotterdam and in some Belgian speakers.
* Phonetically, the ending points of the native diphthongs are lower and more central than cardinal , i.e. more like or even (however, Jo Verhoven reports a rather close () ending point of the Belgian Standard Dutch variant of , so this might be somewhat variable). In Belgian Standard Dutch, the ending points are shorter than in Northern Standard Dutch, but in both varieties the glide is an essential part of the articulation. Furthermore, in Northern Standard Dutch there is no appreciable difference between the ending points of and the phonetic diphthongs , with both sets ending in vowels close to .
* In some regional varieties of Standard Dutch (Southern, regional Belgian), the ending points of are even lower than in Standard Dutch: , and in the traditional dialect of The Hague they are pure monophthongs . Broad Amsterdam speakers can also monophthongize , but to . It typically does not merge with as that vowel has a rather back () realization in Amsterdam.

Apart from which occur only in Northern Standard Dutch and regional Netherlands Standard Dutch, all varieties of Standard Dutch have phonetic diphthongs . Phonemically, they are considered to be sequences of by Geert Booij and as monosyllabic sequences by Beverley Collins and Inger Mees (they do not comment on and ). This article adopts the former analysis.

In Northern Standard Dutch, the second elements of can be labiodental . This is especially common in intervocalic positions.

In Northern Standard Dutch and regional Netherlands Standard Dutch, the close-mid elements of may be subject to the same kind of diphthongization as , so they may be actually triphthongs with two closing elements ( can instead be , a closing diphthong followed by ). In Rotterdam, can be phonetically , with a central starting point.

is realized with more prominence on the first element according to Booij and with equal prominence on both elements according to Collins and Mees. Other diphthongs have more prominence on the first element.

The ending points of these diphthongs are typically somewhat more central () than cardinal . They tend to be higher than the ending points of the phonemic diphthongs .

Example words for vowels and diphthongs

Stress

Most native Germanic words (the bulk of the core vocabulary) are stressed on the root syllable, which is usually the first syllable of the word. Germanic words may also be stressed on the second or later syllable if certain unstressed prefixes are added (particularly in verbs). Non-root stress is common in loanwords, which are generally borrowed with the stress placement unchanged. In polysyllabic words, secondary stress may also be present. Certain prefixes and suffixes will receive secondary stress: , . The stressed syllable of a word receive secondary stress within a compound word: , .

The vast majority of compound nouns are stressed on the first element: ''appeltaart'' , ''luidspreker'' . The word ''boeren'' generally takes secondary stress in compounds: ''boerenkool'' , ''boerenland'' . Some compounds formed from two words are stressed on the second element: ''stadhuis'' , ''rijksdaalder'' . In some cases the secondary stress in a compound shifts to preserve a trochaic pattern: ''eiland'' , but ''schateiland'' . Compounds formed from two compound words tend to observe these same rules. But in compounds formed from more than two words the stress is irregular.

While stress is phonemic, minimal pairs are rare, and marking the stress in written Dutch is always optional, but it is sometimes recommended to distinguish homographs that differ only in stress. While it is common practice to distinguish ''een'' (indefinite article) from ''één'' (the cardinal number one), this distinction is not so much about stress as it is about the pronunciation of the vowel ( versus ), and while the former is always unstressed, the latter may or may not be stressed. Stress also distinguishes some verbs, as stress placement on prefixes also carries a grammatical distinction, such as in '' vóórkomen'' ('to occur') and '' voorkómen'' ('to prevent'). In ''vóórkomen'' and other verbs with a stressed prefix, the prefix is separable and separates as ''kom voor'' in the first-person singular present, with the past participle ''vóórgekomen''. On the other hand, verbs with an unstressed prefix are not separable: ''voorkómen'' becomes ''voorkóm'' in the first-person singular present, and ''voorkómen'' in the past participle, without the past participle prefix ''ge-''.

Dutch has a strong stress accent like other Germanic languages, and it uses stress timing because of its relatively complex syllable structure. It has a preference for trochaic rhythm, with relatively stronger and weaker stress alternating between syllables in such a way that syllables with stronger stress are produced at a more or less constant pace. Generally, every alternate syllable before and after the primary stress will receive relative stress, as far secondary stress placements allow: Wá.gə.nì.ngən. Relative stress preferably does not fall on so syllables containing may disrupt the trochaic rhythm. To restore the pattern, vowels are often syncopated in speech: kín.də.rən > , há.ri.ngən > , vər.gə.líj.king > . In words for which the secondary stress is imposed lexically onto the syllable immediately following the stressed syllable, a short pause is often inserted after the stressed syllable to maintain the rhythm to ensure that the stressed syllable has more or less equal length to the trochaic unit following it: bóm..mèl.ding, wéér..lò.zə.

Historically, the stress accent has reduced most vowels in unstressed syllables to , as in most other Germanic languages. This process is still somewhat productive, and it is common to reduce vowels to in syllables carrying neither primary nor secondary stress, particularly in syllables that are relatively weakly stressed due to the trochaic rhythm. Weakly stressed long vowels may also be shortened without any significant reduction in vowel quality. For example, ''politie'' (phonemically ) may be pronounced , or even .

Phonotactics

The syllable structure of Dutch is (C)(C)(C)V(C)(C)(C)(C). Many words, as in English, begin with three consonants such as '' straat'' (street). Words that end in four consonants are mostly superlative adjectives.

Onset

Notes on individual consonants:
* is the only phoneme that can occur at the beginning of a sequence of three consonants: ''spreeuw'', ''splinter'', ''struik'', ''scriptie'', ''sclerose'', ''schram''. It is the only consonant that can occur before : ''smart''. It cannot occur immediately before , though it does ''phonetically'' for speakers who drop in the sequence (very common in ''schrijven'').
* The only possible consonant cluster with is : ''zwabber''.
* is infrequent as the first element, mostly occurring in roots coming from Greek: ''chiropracticus'', ''chronologisch'', ''chlamydia''. It is very common in the sequence .
* , and only occur outside clusters.
* cannot appear in onsets except as an ambisyllabic word-internal consonant.

A sequence of CCC always begins with . The CC-structure can be realised by almost all stops and non-sibilant, non-glottal fricatives followed by the sonorants or , exceptions are that and are impossible: ''brutaal'', ''bling'', ''printplaat'', ''krimp'', ''kloot'', ''grapefruit'', ''glossy'', ''truck'', ''droevig'', ''vrij'', ''wreken'', ''vlaag'', ''fris'', ''flodder'', ''groen'', ''glunderen'', ''chrisma'', ''chloroform''.
Voiced obstruents cannot appear in other clusters except for . Voiceless obstruents can occur in stop-fricative and fricative-stop clusters. Sequences of a voiceless obstruent or and are also possible, for only occurs:
* Stop-fricative clusters primarily occur in loan words: ''tsaar'', ''tsunami'', ''Tsjechisch'', ''pfeiffer''.
** ''psoriasis'', ''psalm'', ''xylofoon'' and the rare ''pterodactylus'' are typical of words derived from Greek.
* An obstruent followed by appears in many native words: ''knecht'', ''snikken'', more rarely ''gniffelen'' (also in Greek words, ''gnostiek''), ''fnuiken''.
** ''pneumatisch'' only appears in Greek words.

Nasals rarely begin clusters.

Coda

* Voiced consonants only appear in loan words: ''jazz''.
* appears alone, preceded by or , or followed by , , or a combination of these.
* does not occur before labials and dorsals, does not occur before labials and does not occur before dorsals. cannot follow long vowels or diphthongs.
* cannot occur after diphthongs.
* , and do not occur.

Historic sound changes

Dutch (with the exception of the Limburg dialects) did not participate in the second Germanic consonant shift:
* > : German ''machen'' vs. Dutch , English ''make''
* > : German ''Schaf'' vs. Dutch , English ''sheep''
* > : German ''Wasser'' vs. Dutch , English ''water''

Dutch has also preserved the fricative variety of Proto-Germanic as (devoiced to in the north), in contrast with some dialects of German, which generalised the stop , and English, which lost the fricative variety through regular sound changes. Dutch has, however, had a fortition of to like High (and Low) German:

* > : German ''das'', Dutch vs. English ''that''

Dutch also underwent a few changes on its own:
* Words with -old, -olt or -ald and -alt lost the in favor of a diphthong mostly in Middle Dutch, as a result of l-vocalisation. Compare English ''old'', German ''alt'', Dutch .
* changed to , spelled , but it was later reverted in many words by analogy with other forms. Compare English ''loft'', German ''Luft'', Dutch ''lucht'' .
* Proto-Germanic turned into through palatalisation, which, in turn, became the diphthong , spelled . Long also diphthongised to , spelled .

Sample

The sample text is a reading of the first sentence of '' The North Wind and the Sun''.

Northern Standard Dutch

The phonetic transcription illustrates a Western Netherlandic, educated, middle-generation speech and a careful colloquial style.

Orthographic version

De noordenwind en de zon hadden een discussie over de vraag wie van hun tweeën de sterkste was, toen er juist iemand voorbijkwam die een dikke, warme jas aanhad.

Phonemic transcription

Phonetic transcription

Source: . Close-mid vowels are transcribed as diphthongs according to the same page.

Belgian Standard Dutch

The phonetic transcription illustrates the speech of a highly educated 45-year-old male who speaks Belgian Dutch with a very slight regional Limburg accent.

Orthographic version

De noordenwind en de zon waren ruzie aan het maken over wie het sterkste was toen er een reiziger voorbij kwam met een warme jas aan.

Phonemic transcription

Phonetic transcription

See also

* Dutch orthography
* Hard and soft G in Dutch
* Afrikaans phonology

References

Bibliography

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* A summary of the presentation can be foun
here

*
*

Further reading

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

External links

{{DEFAULTSORT:Dutch Phonology

Phonology
Netherlandic studies