Cyclopentadienyliron dicarbonyl dimer

Cyclopentadienyliron dicarbonyl dimer is an organometallic compound with the formula ''η''⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)₂sub>2, often abbreviated to Cp₂Fe₂(CO)₄, pFe(CO)₂sub>2 or even Fp₂, with the colloquial name "fip dimer". It is a dark reddish-purple crystalline solid, which is readily soluble in moderately polar organic solvents such as chloroform and pyridine, but less soluble in carbon tetrachloride and carbon disulfide. Cp₂Fe₂(CO)₄ is insoluble in but stable toward water. Cp₂Fe₂(CO)₄ is reasonably stable to storage under air and serves as a convenient starting material for accessing other Fp (CpFe(CO)₂) derivatives (described below).

Structure

In solution, Cp₂Fe₂(CO)₄ can be considered a dimeric half-sandwich complex. It exists in three isomeric forms: ''cis'', ''trans'', and an unbridged, open form. These isomeric forms are distinguished by the position of the ligands. The ''cis'' and ''trans'' isomers differ in the relative position of C₅H₅ (Cp) ligands. The ''cis'' and ''trans'' isomers have the formulation ''η''⁵-C₅H₅)Fe(CO)(''μ''-CO)sub>2, that is, two CO ligands are terminal whereas the other two CO ligands bridge between the iron atoms. The ''cis'' and ''trans'' isomers interconvert via the open isomer, which has no bridging ligands between iron atoms. Instead, it is formulated as (''η''⁵-C₅H₅)(OC)₂Fe−Fe(CO)₂(''η''⁵-C₅H₅) — the metals are held together by an iron–iron bond. At equilibrium, the ''cis'' and ''trans'' isomers are predominant.

:

In addition, the terminal and bridging carbonyls are known to undergo exchange: the ''trans'' isomer can undergo bridging–terminal CO ligand exchange through the open isomer, or through a twisting motion without going through the open form. In contrast, the bridging and terminal CO ligands of the ''cis'' isomer can only exchange via the open isomer.

In solution, the ''cis'', ''trans'', and open isomers interconvert rapidly at room temperature, making the molecular structure fluxional. The fluxional process for cyclopentadienyliron dicarbonyl dimer is faster than the NMR time scale, so that only an averaged, single Cp signal is observed in the ¹H NMR spectrum at 25 °C. Likewise, the ¹³C NMR spectrum exhibits one sharp CO signal above −10 °C, while the Cp signal sharpens to one peak above 60 °C. NMR studies indicate that the ''cis'' isomer is slightly more abundant than the ''trans'' isomer at room temperature, while the amount of the open form is small. The fluxional process is not fast enough to produce averaging in the IR spectrum. Thus, three absorptions are seen for each isomer. The bridging CO ligands appear at around 1780 cm⁻¹ whereas the terminal CO ligands are observed at around 1980 cm⁻¹. The averaged structure of these isomers of Cp₂Fe₂(CO)₄ results in a dipole moment of 3.1  D in benzene.

The solid-state molecular structure of both ''cis'' and ''trans'' isomers have been analyzed by X-ray and neutron diffraction. The Fe–Fe separation and the Fe–C bond lengths are the same in the Fe₂C₂ rhomboids, an exactly planar Fe₂C₂ four-membered ring in the ''trans'' isomer versus a folded rhomboid in ''cis'' with an angle of 164°, and significant distortions in the Cp ring of the ''trans'' isomer reflecting different Cp orbital populations. Although older textbooks show the two iron atoms bonded to each other, theoretical analyses indicate the absence of a direct Fe–Fe bond. This view is consistent with computations and X-ray crystallographic data that indicate a lack of significant electron density between the iron atoms. However, Labinger offers a dissenting view, based primarily on chemical reactivity and spectroscopic data, arguing that electron density is not necessarily the best indication of the presence of a chemical bond. Moreover, without an Fe–Fe bond, the bridging carbonyls must be formally treated as an μ-X₂ ligand and μ-L ligand in order for the iron centers to satisfy the 18-electron rule. This formalism is argued to give misleading implications with respect to the chemical and spectroscopic behavior of the carbonyl groups.

Synthesis

Cp₂Fe₂(CO)₄ was first prepared in 1955 at Harvard by Geoffrey Wilkinson using the same method employed today: the reaction of iron pentacarbonyl and dicyclopentadiene.
:2 Fe(CO)₅ + C₁₀H₁₂ → (''η''⁵-C₅H₅)₂Fe₂(CO)₄ + 6 CO + H₂
In this preparation, dicyclopentadiene cracks to give cyclopentadiene, which reacts with Fe(CO)₅ with loss of CO. Thereafter, the pathways for the photochemical and thermal routes differ subtly but both entail formation of a hydride intermediate. The method is used in the teaching laboratory.

Reactions

Although of no major commercial value, Fp₂ is a workhorse in organometallic chemistry because it is inexpensive and FpX derivatives are rugged (X = halide, organyl).

"Fp⁻" (FpNa and FpK)

Reductive cleavage of pFe(CO)₂sub>2 (formally an iron(I) complex) produces alkali metal derivatives formally derived from the cyclopentadienyliron dicarbonyl anion, pFe(CO)₂sup>− or called Fp⁻ (formally iron(0)), which are assumed to exist as a tight ion pair. A typical reductant is sodium metal or sodium amalgam; NaK alloy, potassium graphite (KC₈), and alkali metal trialkylborohydrides have been used. pFe(CO)₂a is a widely studied reagent since it is readily alkylated, acylated, or metalated by treatment with an appropriate electrophile. It is an excellent S_N2 nucleophile, being one to two orders of magnitude more nucleophilic than thiophenolate, PhS^– when reacted with primary and secondary alkyl bromides.
: pFe(CO)₂sub>2 + 2 Na → 2 CpFe(CO)₂Na
: pFe(CO)₂sub>2 + 2 KBH(C₂H₅)₃ → 2 CpFe(CO)₂K + H₂ + 2 B(C₂H₅)₃
Treatment of NaFp with an alkyl halide (RX, X = Br, I) produces FeR(''η''⁵-C₅H₅)(CO)₂
:CpFe(CO)₂K + CH₃I → CpFe(CO)₂CH₃ + KI

Fp₂ can also be cleaved with alkali metals and by electrochemical reduction.

FpX (X = Cl, Br, I)

Halogens oxidatively cleave pFe(CO)₂sub>2 to give the Fe(II) species FpX (X = Cl, Br, I):

: pFe(CO)₂sub>2 + X₂ → 2 CpFe(CO)₂X
One example is cyclopentadienyliron dicarbonyl iodide.

Fp(''η''²-alkene)⁺, Fp(''η''²-alkyne)⁺ and other "Fp⁺"

In the presence of halide anion acceptors such as aluminium bromide or silver tetrafluoroborate, FpX compounds (X = halide) react with alkenes, alkynes, or neutral labile ligands (such as ethers and nitriles) to afford Fp⁺ complexes. In another approach, salts of p(isobutene)sup>+ are readily obtained by reaction of NaFp with methallyl chloride followed by protonolysis. This complex is a convenient and general precursor to other cationic Fp–alkene and Fp–alkyne complexes. The exchange process is facilitated by the loss of gaseous and bulky isobutene. Generally, less substituted alkenes bind more strongly and can displace more hindered alkene ligands. Alkene and alkyne complexes can also be prepared by heating a cationic ether or aqua complex, for example , with the alkene or alkyne. complexes can also be prepared by treatment of FpMe with HBF₄· Et₂O in CH₂Cl₂ at −78 °C, followed by addition of L.

:
Alkene–Fp complexes can also be prepared from Fp anion indirectly. Thus, hydride abstraction from Fp–alkyl compounds using triphenylmethyl hexafluorophosphate affords p(α-alkene)sup>+ complexes.
:FpNa + RCH₂CH₂I → FpCH₂CH₂R + NaI
:FpCH₂CH₂R + Ph₃CPF₆ → + Ph₃CH
Reaction of NaFp with an epoxide followed by acid-promoted dehydration also affords alkene complexes. Fp(alkene)⁺ are stable with respect to bromination, hydrogenation, and acetoxymercuration, but the alkene is easily released with sodium iodide in acetone or by warming with acetonitrile.

:
The alkene ligand in these cations is activated toward attack by nucleophiles, opening the way to a number of carbon–carbon bond-forming reactions. Nucleophilic additions usually occur at the more substituted carbon. This regiochemistry is attributed to the greater positive charge density at this position. The regiocontrol is often modest. The addition of the nucleophile is completely stereoselective, occurring ''anti'' to the Fp group. Analogous Fp(alkyne)⁺ complexes are also reported to undergo nucleophilic addition reactions by various carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen nucleophiles.

:

Fp(alkene)⁺ and Fp(alkyne)⁺ π-complexes are also quite acidic at the allylic and propargylic positions, respectively, and can be quantitatively deprotonated with amine bases like Et₃N to give neutral Fp–allyl and Fp–allenyl σ-complexes (eqn 1).

:(1) + Et₃N → FpCH₂CH=CHCH₃ +
:(2) FpCH₂CH=CHCH₃ + →

Fp–allyl and Fp–allenyl react with cationic electrophiles E (such as Me₃O⁺, carbocations, oxocarbenium ions) to generate allylic and propargylic functionalization products, respectively (eqn 2). The related complex p*Fe(CO)₂(thf)sup>+ F₄sup>− has been shown to catalyze propargylic and allylic C−H functionalization by combining the deprotonation and electrophilic functionalization processes described above.

η²-Allenyl complexes of Fp⁺ and substituted cyclopentadienyliron dicarbonyl cations have also been characterized, with X-ray crystallographic analysis showing substantial bending at the central allenic carbon (bond angle < 150°).

Fp-based cyclopropanation reagents

Fp-based reagents have been developed for cyclopropanations. The key reagent is prepared from FpNa with a thioether and methyl iodide, and has a good shelf-life, in contrast to typical Simmons-Smith intermediates and diazoalkanes.

:FpNa + ClCH₂SCH₃ → FpCH₂SCH₃ + NaCl
:FpCH₂SCH₃ + CH₃I + NaBF₄ → FpCH₂S(CH₃)₂]BF₄ + NaI

Use of pCH₂S(CH₃)₂F₄ does not require specialized conditions.
: + (Ph)₂C=CH₂ → 1,1-diphenylcyclopropane + …
Iron(III) chloride is added to destroy any byproduct.

Precursors to , like FpCH₂OMe which is converted to the iron carbene upon protonation, have also been used as cyclopropanation reagents.

Photochemical reaction

Fp₂ exhibits photochemistry. For example, upon UV irradiation at 350 nm, it is reduced by benzylnicotinamide, 1-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide dimer, also known as (BNA)₂.
:

References

{{iron compounds

Organoiron compounds
Carbonyl complexes
Cyclopentadienyl complexes
Dimers (chemistry)
Half sandwich compounds