The Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM) is an international treaty that prohibits the use, transfer, and stockpiling of cluster bombs, a type of explosive weapon which scatters submunitions ("bomblets") over an area. The convention was adopted on 2008 in Dublin, and was opened for signature on 2008 in Oslo. It entered into force on 2010, six months after it was ratified by 30 states.Article 17 of th
Convention on Cluster Munitions
. Retrieved on 2008. As of September 2020, 108 states have signed the treaty and 110 have ratified it or acceded to it. Countries that ratify the convention will be obliged "never under any circumstances to":Article 1 of th

. Retrieved on 2008.

(a) Use cluster munitions; (b) Develop, produce, otherwise acquire, stockpile, retain or transfer to anyone, directly or indirectly, cluster munitions; (c) Assist, encourage or induce anyone to engage in any activity prohibited to a State Party under this Convention.

The treaty allows certain types of weapons with submunitions that do not have the indiscriminate area effects or pose the same unexploded ordnance risks as cluster munitions. Permitted weapons must contain fewer than ten submunitions, and each must weigh more than , and each submunition must have the capability to detect and engage a single target object and contain electronic self-destruct and self-deactivation mechanisms. Weapons containing submunitions which all individually weigh at least are also excluded.Article 2 of th

. Retrieved on 2010. A limited number of prohibited weapons and submunitions can be acquired and kept for training in, and development of, detection, clearance and destruction techniques and counter-measures.

History

The impetus for the treaty, like that of the 1997 Ottawa Treaty to limit landmines, has been concern over the severe damage and risks to civilians from explosive weapons during and long after attacks. A varying proportion of submunitions dispersed by cluster bombs fail to explode on impact and can lie unexploded for years until disturbed. The sometimes brightly colored munitions are not camouflaged, but have been compared to toys or Easter eggs, attracting children at play. Human rights activists claim that one in four casualties resulting from submunitions that fail to explode on impact are children who often pick up and play with the explosive canisters well after the conflict has ended."Britain Joins a Draft Treaty on Cluster Munitions "
''The New York Times'', 2008 The 2006 Lebanon War provided momentum for the campaign to ban cluster bombs. The United Nations estimated that up to 40% of Israeli cluster bomblets failed to explode on impact. Norway organized the independent Oslo process after discussions at the traditional disarmament forum in Geneva fell through in November 2006."46 Nations Push for Cluster Bomb Treaty"
''Associated Press'' via ''The Washington Post'', 23 February 2007 The cluster munitions ban process, also known as the Oslo Process, began in February 2007 in Oslo. At this time, 46 nations issued the "Oslo Declaration", committing themselves to:

Conclude by 2008 a legally binding international instrument that prohibits the use and stockpiling of cluster munitions that cause unacceptable harm to civilians and secure adequate provision of care and rehabilitation to survivors and clearance of contaminated areas.

The Oslo Process held meetings in Lima in May 2007 and Vienna in December 2007. In February 2008, 79 countries adopted the "Wellington Declaration", setting forth the principles to be included in the convention.Declaration of the Wellington conference on cluster munitions
. Retrieved on 2008.

Adoption

from Afghanistan and Ethiopia demonstrating during the May 2008 Dublin conference]] Delegates from 107 nations agreed to the final draft of the treaty at the end of a ten-day meeting held in May 2008 in Dublin, Ireland. Its text was formally adopted on 2008 by 107 nations, including 7 of the 14 countries that have used cluster bombs and 17 of the 34 countries that have produced them.Mines Action Canada (2008). . Retrieved on 2008. The treaty was opposed by a number of countries that produce or stockpile significant quantities of cluster munitions, including China, Russia, the United States, India, Israel, Pakistan and Brazil. The U.S. has acknowledged humanitarian concerns about the use of cluster munitions, but insisted that the proper venue for a discussion of cluster munitions was the forum attached to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, which includes all major military powers. The U.S. has further stated that the development and introduction of "smart" cluster munitions, where each submunition contains its own targeting and guidance system as well as an auto-self-destruct mechanism, means that the problematic munitions are being moved away from in any case. In 2006, Barack Obama voted to support a legislative measure to limit use of the bombs, while his general election opponent John McCain and his primary opponent Hillary Clinton both voted against it. According to the Pentagon's 2008 policy, cluster munitions are actually humane weapons. "Because future adversaries will likely use civilian shields for military targets – for example by locating a military target on the roof of an occupied building – use of unitary weapons could result in more civilian casualties and damage than cluster munitions," the policy claims. "Blanket elimination of cluster munitions is therefore unacceptable due not only to negative military consequences but also due to potential negative consequences for civilians." The treaty allows certain types of weapons with submunitions that do not have the indiscriminate area effects or pose the same unexploded ordnance risks as the prohibited weapons. These must contain no more than nine submunitions, and no submunition may weigh less than . Each submunition must have the capability to detect and engage a single target object and contain electronic self-destruct and self-deactivation devices. Weapons containing submunitions which each weigh at least are also excluded. Australia, which supports the treaty, stated that the convention does not prohibit the SMArt 155 artillery shell that it has bought, which releases two self-guided self-destructing submunitions."Fitzgibbon wants to keep SMArt cluster shells"
''Australia Broadcasting Corporation'', 2008 In response to U.S. lobbying, and also concerns raised by diplomats from Australia, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom and others, the treaty includes a provision allowing signatory nations to cooperate militarily with non-signatory nations. This provision is designed to provide legal protections to the military personnel of signatory nations engaged in military operations with the U.S. or other non-signatory nations that might use cluster munitions."British turnabout key to cluster bomb ban"
''Los Angeles Times'', 2008 David Miliband, who was Britain's foreign secretary under Labour, approved the use of a loophole to manoeuvre around the ban and allow the US to keep the munitions on British territory. Prior to the Dublin meeting, the United Kingdom was thought to be one of a group of nations in a pivotal role whereby their cooperation could make or break the treaty. In an unexpected turn of events shortly before the end of the conference, Prime Minister Gordon Brown declared that the United Kingdom would withdraw all of its cluster bombs from service."Observers laud landmark cluster bomb ban"
, ''AFP'', 2008 This was done despite intense behind-the-scenes lobbying by the U.S. and objections by British government personnel who saw utility in the weapons. The CCM was opened for signature at a ceremony at Oslo City Hall on 3– 2008. By the end of the ceremony, 94 states had signed the treaty, including four (Ireland, the Holy See, Sierra Leone and Norway) which had also submitted their instruments of ratification. Signatories included 21 of the 27 member-states of the European Union and 18 of the 26 countries in NATO. Among the signatories were several states affected by cluster munitions, including Laos and Lebanon. In November 2008, ahead of the signing Conference in Oslo, the European Parliament passed a resolution calling on all European Union governments to sign and ratify the Convention, as several EU countries had not yet declared their intention to do so. Finland had declared it would not sign, having just signed the Ottawa Treaty and replaced its mine arsenal largely with cluster munitions.

Entry into force

According to article 17 of the treaty, the convention entered into force "on the first day of the sixth month after the month in which the thirtieth instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession has been deposited". Since the thirtieth ratification was deposited during February 2010, the convention entered into force on 2010; by that point, 38 nations had ratified the treaty. As the convention entered into force, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon spoke of "not only the world's collective revulsion at these abhorrent weapons, but also the power of collaboration among governments, civil society and the United Nations to change attitudes and policies on a threat faced by all humankind". A spokesman for the International Committee of the Red Cross said "These weapons are a relic of the Cold War. They are a legacy that has to be eliminated because they increasingly won't work". Nobel peace prize winner Jody Williams called the convention "the most important disarmament and humanitarian convention in over a decade". Anti-cluster munitions campaigners praised the rapid progress made in the adoption of the convention, and expressed hope that even non-signatories – such as China, North Korea, Russia, and the US – would be discouraged from using the weapons by the entry into force of the convention. As one of the countries that did not ratify the treaty, the United States said that cluster bombs are a legal form of weapon, and that they had a "clear military utility in combat." It also said that compared to other types of weapons, cluster bombs are less harmful to civilians. Article 11 requires the first Meeting of States Parties to be held within 12 months of the entry into force. The first such meeting was held in Laos in November 2010. There is a President, currently Swiss ambassador Félix Baumann. To date, the United States and Russia have not signed this convention.


State parties

thumb|250px|Signatories to the Convention (blue) and State Parties (purple) To date, there are 111 State Parties to the Convention. Another 16 states have signed, but not ratified the convention.


See also

* Arms control * Lawfare * Human Rights Watch * Handicap International * Mines Advisory Group


Notes

:The Convention does not apply to the Faroe Islands. :The Convention does not apply to Aruba, Curaçao, or Sint Maarten. :The Convention does not apply to Tokelau.


References




External links


Convention on Cluster Munitions
€”full text, articles, State parties and signatories

on the ''Convention on Cluster Munitions'' in th



Official


clusterconvention.org
€”official website *
Text of the treaty

signatures and ratifications
(United Nations treaty collection)
Dublin Diplomatic Conference website


Non-governmental organisations


Cluster munitions and international humanitarian law
ICRC
Cluster Munition Coalition

Ban Advocates
€”voices from affected communities
People's Treaty
€”petition in support of the convention
MAG (Mines Advisory Group)
{{DEFAULTSORT:Convention On Cluster Munitions Category:Cluster munition Category:Arms control treaties Category:International humanitarian law treaties Category:2008 in Ireland Category:Treaties concluded in 2008 Category:Treaties entered into force in 2010 Category:Mine action Category:Treaties of Afghanistan Category:Treaties of Albania Category:Treaties of Andorra Category:Treaties of Antigua and Barbuda Category:Treaties of Australia Category:Treaties of Austria Category:Treaties of Belgium Category:Treaties of Belize Category:Treaties of Benin Category:Treaties of Bolivia Category:Treaties of Bosnia and Herzegovina Category:Treaties of Botswana Category:Treaties of Bulgaria Category:Treaties of Burkina Faso Category:Treaties of Burundi Category:Treaties of Cameroon Category:Treaties of Canada Category:Treaties of Cape Verde Category:Treaties of Chad Category:Treaties of Chile Category:Treaties of Colombia Category:Treaties of the Comoros Category:Treaties of the Republic of the Congo Category:Treaties of the Cook Islands Category:Treaties of Costa Rica Category:Treaties of Ivory Coast Category:Treaties of Croatia Category:Treaties of Cuba Category:Treaties of the Czech Republic Category:Treaties of Denmark Category:Treaties of the Dominican Republic Category:Treaties of Ecuador Category:Treaties of El Salvador Category:Treaties of Fiji Category:Treaties of France Category:Treaties of the Gambia Category:Treaties of Germany Category:Treaties of Ghana Category:Treaties of Grenada Category:Treaties of Guatemala Category:Treaties of Guinea Category:Treaties of Guinea-Bissau Category:Treaties of Guyana Category:Treaties of the Holy See Category:Treaties of Honduras Category:Treaties of Hungary Category:Treaties of Iceland Category:Treaties of Iraq Category:Treaties of Ireland Category:Treaties of Italy Category:Treaties of Japan Category:Treaties of Laos Category:Treaties of Lebanon Category:Treaties of Lesotho Category:Treaties of Liechtenstein Category:Treaties of Lithuania Category:Treaties of Luxembourg Category:Treaties of Madagascar Category:Treaties of Malawi Category:Treaties of Mali Category:Treaties of Malta Category:Treaties of Mauritania Category:Treaties of Mauritius Category:Treaties of Mexico Category:Treaties of Moldova Category:Treaties of Monaco Category:Treaties of Montenegro Category:Treaties of Mozambique Category:Treaties of Namibia Category:Treaties of Nauru Category:Treaties of the Netherlands Category:Treaties of New Zealand Category:Treaties of Nicaragua Category:Treaties of Niger Category:Treaties of Norway Category:Treaties of Palau Category:Treaties of the State of Palestine Category:Treaties of Panama Category:Treaties of Paraguay Category:Treaties of Peru Category:Treaties of Portugal Category:Treaties of Rwanda Category:Treaties of Samoa Category:Treaties of San Marino Category:Treaties of Senegal Category:Treaties of Seychelles Category:Treaties of Sierra Leone Category:Treaties of Slovakia Category:Treaties of Slovenia Category:Treaties of South Africa Category:Treaties of Spain Category:Treaties of Saint Kitts and Nevis Category:Treaties of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Category:Treaties of Eswatini Category:Treaties of Sweden Category:Treaties of Switzerland Category:Treaties of North Macedonia Category:Treaties of Togo Category:Treaties of Trinidad and Tobago Category:Treaties of Tunisia Category:Treaties of the United Kingdom Category:Treaties of Uruguay Category:Treaties of Zambia Category:Treaties extended to the Caribbean Netherlands Category:Treaties extended to Greenland Category:Treaties extended to the Isle of Man