Comparison of instruction set architectures

An instruction set architecture (ISA) is an abstract model of a computer, also referred to as computer architecture. A realization of an ISA is called an ''implementation''. An ISA permits multiple implementations that may vary in performance, physical size, and monetary cost (among other things); because the ISA serves as the interface between software and hardware. Software that has been written for an ISA can run on different implementations of the same ISA. This has enabled binary compatibility between different generations of computers to be easily achieved, and the development of computer families. Both of these developments have helped to lower the cost of computers and to increase their applicability. For these reasons, the ISA is one of the most important abstractions in computing today.

An ISA defines everything a machine language programmer needs to know in order to program a computer. What an ISA defines differs between ISAs; in general, ISAs define the supported data types, what state there is (such as the main memory and registers) and their semantics (such as the memory consistency and addressing modes), the ''instruction set'' (the set of machine instructions that comprises a computer's machine language), and the input/output model.

Base

In the early decades of computing, there were computers that used binary, decimal and even ternary.. Contemporary computers are almost exclusively binary.

Bits

Computer architectures are often described as ''n''-bit architectures. Today ''n'' is often 8, 16, 32, or 64, but other sizes have been used (including 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 39, 48, 60). This is actually a simplification as computer architecture often has a few more or less "natural" datasizes in the instruction set, but the hardware implementation of these may be very different. Many instruction set architectures have instructions that, on some implementations of that instruction set architecture, operate on half and/or twice the size of the processor's major internal datapaths. Examples of this are the 8080, Z80, MC68000 as well as many others. On these types of implementations, a twice as wide operation typically also takes around twice as many clock cycles (which is not the case on high performance implementations). On the 68000, for instance, this means 8 instead of 4 clock ticks, and this particular chip may be described as a 32-bit architecture with a 16-bit implementation. The IBM System/360 instruction set architecture is 32-bit, but several models of the System/360 series, such as the IBM System/360 Model 30, have smaller internal data paths, while others, such as the 360/195, have larger internal data paths. The external databus width is not used to determine the width of the architecture; the NS32008, NS32016 and NS32032 were basically the same 32-bit chip with different external data buses; the NS32764 had a 64-bit bus, and used 32-bit register. Early 32-bit microprocessors often had a 24-bit address, as did the System/360 processors.

Operands

The number of operands is one of the factors that may give an indication about the performance of the instruction set.
A three-operand architecture will allow
A := B + C
to be computed in one instruction.

A two-operand architecture will allow
A := A + B
to be computed in one instruction, so two instructions will need to be executed to simulate a single three-operand instruction.
A := B
A := A + C

Endianness

An architecture may use "big" or "little" endianness, or both, or be configurable to use either. Little-endian processors order bytes in memory with the least significant byte of a multi-byte value in the lowest-numbered memory location. Big-endian architectures instead arrange bytes with the most significant byte at the lowest-numbered address. The x86 architecture as well as several 8-bit architectures are little-endian. Most RISC architectures (SPARC, Power, PowerPC, MIPS) were originally big-endian (ARM was little-endian), but many (including ARM) are now configurable as either.

Endianness ''only'' applies to processors that allow individual addressing of units of data (such as bytes) that are ''smaller'' than the basic addressable machine word.

Instruction sets

The table below compares basic information about instruction set architectures.

Notes:
* Usually the number of registers is a power of two, e.g. 8, 16, 32. In some cases a hardwired-to-zero pseudo-register is included, as "part" of register files of architectures, mostly to simplify indexing modes. The column "Registers" only counts the integer "registers" usable by general instructions at any moment. Architectures always include special-purpose registers such as the program counter (PC). Those are not counted unless mentioned. Note that some architectures, such as SPARC, have register windows; for those architectures, the count indicates how many registers are available within a register window. Also, non-architected registers for register renaming are not counted.
* In the "Type" column, "Register–Register" is a synonym for a common type of architecture, " load–store", meaning that no instruction can directly access memory except some special ones, i.e. load to or store from register(s), with the possible exceptions of memory locking instructions for atomic operations.
* In the "Endianness" column, "Bi" means that the endianness is configurable.

See also

* Central processing unit (CPU)
* Processor design
* Comparison of CPU microarchitectures
* Instruction set architecture
* Microprocessor
* Benchmark (computing)

Notes

References

{{CPU technologies

*
Computer architecture
Computing comparisons