The Info List - Commons

--- Advertisement ---

The commons is the cultural and natural resources accessible to all members of a society, including natural materials such as air, water, and a habitable earth. These resources are held in common, not owned privately. Commons
can also be understood as natural resources that groups of people (communities, user groups) manage for individual and collective benefit. Characteristically, this involves a variety of informal norms and values (social practice) employed for a governance mechanism.[1]


1 Definition and modern use 2 Types of commons

2.1 Environmental resource

2.1.1 European land use 2.1.2 Mongolian grasslands 2.1.3 Lobster fishery of Maine 2.1.4 Community forests in Nepal 2.1.5 Irrigation
systems of New Mexico

2.2 Cultural
and intellectual commons 2.3 Digital commons 2.4 Urban Commons 2.5 Knowledge Commons

3 Economic theories

3.1 Tragedy of the commons 3.2 Successful commons 3.3 Notable theorists

4 Historical land commons movements 5 Contemporary commons movements 6 See also 7 References 8 Further reading 9 External links

Definition and modern use[edit] The Digital Library of the Commons
defines "commons" as "a general term for shared resources in which each stakeholder has an equal interest".[2] The term "commons" derives from the traditional English legal term for common land, which are also known as "commons", and was popularised in the modern sense as a shared resource term by the ecologist Garrett Hardin in an influential 1968 article called The Tragedy of the Commons. As Frank van Laerhoven and Elinor Ostrom
Elinor Ostrom
have stated; "Prior to the publication of Hardin's article on the tragedy of the commons (1968), titles containing the words 'the commons', 'common pool resources', or 'common property' were very rare in the academic literature."[3] Some texts make a distinction in usage between common ownership of the commons and collective ownership among a group of colleagues, such as in a producers' cooperative. The precision of this distinction is not always maintained. The use of "commons" for natural resources has its roots in European intellectual history, where it referred to shared agricultural fields, grazing lands and forests that were, over a period of several hundred years, enclosed, claimed as private property for private use. In European political texts, the common wealth was the totality of the material riches of the world, such as the air, the water, the soil and the seed, all nature's bounty regarded as the inheritance of humanity as a whole, to be shared together. In this context, one may go back further, to the Roman legal category res communis, applied to things common to all to be used and enjoyed by everyone, as opposed to res publica, applied to public property managed by the government.[2] Types of commons[edit] Environmental resource[edit] The examples below illustrate types of environmental commons. European land use[edit] Main article: Common land Originally in medieval England the common was an integral part of the manor, and was thus legally part of the estate in land owned by the lord of the manor, but over which certain classes of manorial tenants and others held certain rights. By extension, the term "commons" has come to be applied to other resources which a community has rights or access to. The older texts use the word "common" to denote any such right, but more modern usage is to refer to particular rights of common, and to reserve the name "common" for the land over which the rights are exercised. A person who has a right in, or over, common land jointly with another or others is called a commoner.[4] In middle Europe, commons (relatively small-scale agriculture in, especially, southern Germany, Austria, and the alpine countries) were kept, in some parts, till the present.[5] Some studies have compared the German and English dealings with the commons between late medieval times and the agrarian reforms of the 18th and 19th centuries. The UK was quite radical in doing away with and enclosing former commons, while southwestern Germany (and the alpine countries as e.g. Switzerland) had the most advanced commons structures, and were more inclined to keep them. The Lower Rhine region
Lower Rhine region
took an intermediate position.[6] However, the UK and the former dominions have till today a large amount of Crown land which often is used for community or conservation purposes. Mongolian grasslands[edit] Based on a research project by the Environmental and Cultural Conservation in Inner Asia (ECCIA) from 1992 to 1995, satellite images were used to compare the amount of land degradation due to livestock grazing in the regions of Mongolia, Russia, and China.[7] In Mongolia, where shepherds were permitted to move collectively between seasonal grazing pastures, degradation remained relatively low at approximately 9%. Comparatively, Russia and China, which mandated state-owned pastures involving immobile settlements and in some cases privatization by household, had much higher degradation, at around 75% and 33% respectively.[8] A collaborative effort on the part of Mongolians proved much more efficient in preserving grazing land. Lobster fishery of Maine[edit] Widespread success of the Maine lobster industry is often attributed to the willingness of Maine's lobstermen to uphold and support lobster conservation rules. These rules include harbor territories not recognized by the state, informal trap limits, and laws imposed by the state of Maine (which are largely influenced by lobbying from lobster industry itself).[9] Essentially, the lobstermen collaborate without much government intervention to sustain their common-pool resource. Community forests in Nepal[edit] In the late 1980s, Nepal chose to decentralize government control over forests. Community forest programs work by giving local areas a financial stake in nearby woodlands, and thereby increasing the incentive to protect them from overuse. Local institutions regulate harvesting and selling of timber and land, and must use any profit towards community development and preservation of the forests. In twenty years, locals have noticed a visible increase in the number of trees. Community forestry may also contribute to community development in rural areas – for instance school construction, irrigation and drinking water channel construction, and road construction. Community forestry has proven conducive to democratic practices at grass roots level.[10] Irrigation
systems of New Mexico[edit] Main article: Acequia Acequia
is a method of collective responsibility and management for irrigation systems in desert areas. In New Mexico, a community-run organization known as Acequia
Associations supervises water in terms of diversion, distribution, utilization, and recycling, in order to reinforce agricultural traditions and preserve water as a common resource for future generations.[11] Cultural
and intellectual commons[edit] Today, the commons are also understood within a cultural sphere. These commons include literature, music, arts, design, film, video, television, radio, information, software and sites of heritage. is an example of the production and maintenance of common goods by a contributor community in the form of encyclopedic knowledge that can be freely accessed by anyone without a central authority.[12] Tragedy of the commons
Tragedy of the commons
in the Wiki- Commons
is avoided by community control by individual authors within the community.[13] The information commons may help protect users of commons. Companies that pollute the environment release information about what they are doing. The Corporate Toxics Information Project[14] and information like the Toxic 100, a list of the top 100 polluters,[15] helps people know what these corporations are doing to the environment. Digital commons[edit] Main article: Digital commons (economics) Mayo Fuster Morell proposed a definition of digital commons as "information and knowledge resources that are collectively created and owned or shared between or among a community and that tend to be non-exclusive, that is, be (generally freely) available to third parties. Thus, they are oriented to favor use and reuse, rather than to exchange as a commodity. Additionally, the community of people building them can intervene in the governing of their interaction processes and of their shared resources."[16][17] Examples of digital commons are, free software and open-source hardware projects. Urban Commons[edit] Urban Commons
present the opportunity for the citizens to gain power upon the management of the urban resources and reframe city-life costs based on their use value and maintenance costs, rather than the market-driven value.[18]

Syntagma Square in Athens as urban commons

Tahrir Square in Cairo as urban commons

Urban Commons
situates citizens as key players rather than public authorities, private markets and technologies.[19] David Harvey
David Harvey
(2012) defines the distinction between public spaces and urban commons. Public spaces and goods in the city make a commons when part of the citizens take political action. Syntagma Square in Athens, Tahrir Square in Cairo, and the Plaza de Catalunya in Barcelona were public spaces that transformed to an urban commons as people protested there to support their political statements. Streets are public spaces that have often become an urban commons by social action and revolutionary protests.[20]. Urban commons are operating in the cities in a complementary way with the state and the market. Some examples are community gardening, urban farms on the rooftops and cultural spaces[21]. More recently participatory studies of commons and infrastructures under the conditions of the financial crisis emerge [22] [23]. Knowledge Commons[edit] In 2007, Elinor Ostrom
Elinor Ostrom
along with her colleague Charlotte Hess, did succeed in extending the commons debate to knowledge, approaching knowledge as a complex ecosystem that operates as a common – a shared resource that is subject to social dilemmas. The focus here was on the ready availability of digital forms of knowledge and associated possibilities to store, access and share it as a common. The connection between knowledge and commons may be made through identifying typical problems associated with natural resource commons, such as congestion, overharvesting, pollution and inequities, which also apply to knowledge. Then, effective alternatives (community-based, non-private, non-state), in line with those of natural commons (involving social rules, appropriate property rights and management structures), solutions are proposed. Thus, the commons metaphor is applied to social practice around knowledge. It is in this context that the present work proceeds, discussing the creation of depositories of knowledge through the organised, voluntary contributions of scholars (the research community, itself a social common), the problems that such knowledge commons might face (such as free-riding or disappearing assets), and the protection of knowledge commons from enclosure and commodification (in the form of intellectual property legislation, patenting, licensing and overpricing).[24] At this point, it is important to note the nature of knowledge and its complex and multi-layered qualities of non-rivalry and non-excludability. Unlike natural commons – which are both rival and excludable (only one person can use any one item or portion at a time and in so doing they use it up, it is consumed) and characterised by scarcity (they can be replenished but there are limits to this, such that consumption/destruction may overtake production/creation) – knowledge commons are characterised by abundance (they are non-rival and non-excludable and thus, in principle, not scarce, so not impelling competition and compelling governance). This abundance of knowledge commons has been celebrated through alternative models of knowledge production, such as Commons
Based Peer Production (CBPP), and embodied in the free software movement. The CBPP model showed the power of networked, open collaboration and non-material incentives to produce better quality products (mainly software).[25] Economic theories[edit] Tragedy of the commons[edit] Main article: Tragedy of the commons A commons failure theory, now called tragedy of the commons, originated in the 18th century.[5] In 1833 William Forster Lloyd introduced the concept by a hypothetical example of herders overusing a shared parcel of land on which they are each entitled to let their cows graze, to the detriment of all users of the common land.[26] The same concept has been called the "tragedy of the fishers", when over-fishing could cause stocks to plummet.[27] It has been said the dissolution of the traditional land commons played a watershed role in landscape development and cooperative land use patterns and property rights.[28] However, as in the British Isles, such changes took place over several centuries as a result of land enclosure. Economist Peter Barnes has proposed a 'sky trust' to fix this tragedic problem in worldwide generic commons. He claims that the sky belongs to all the people, and companies do not have a right to over pollute. It is a type of cap and dividend program. Ultimately the goal would be to make polluting excessively more expensive than cleaning what is being put into the atmosphere.[29] Successful commons[edit] While the original work on the tragedy of the commons concept suggested that all commons were doomed to failure, they remain important in the modern world. Work by later economists has found many examples of successful commons, and Elinor Ostrom
Elinor Ostrom
won the Nobel prize for analysing situations where they operate successfully.[30][31] For example, Ostrom found that grazing commons in the Swiss Alps
Swiss Alps
have been run successfully for many hundreds of years by the farmers there.[32] Allied to this is the "comedy of the commons" concept, where users of the commons are able to develop mechanisms to police their use to maintain, and possibly improve, the state of the commons.[33] This term was coined in an essay by legal scholar, Carol M. Rose, in 1986.[33][30][34] Other related concepts are the inverse commons, cornucopia of the commons[35], and triumph of the commons.[36][37] It is argued that some types of commons, such as open-source software, work better in the cornucopia of the commons; proponents say that, in those cases, "the grass grows taller when it is grazed on".[38] Notable theorists[edit]

Peter Barnes Yochai Benkler David Bollier Iain Boal George Caffentzis Barry Commoner Silvia Federici Henry George Garrett Hardin Michael Hardt David Harvey Lewis Hyde Lawrence Lessig Peter Linebaugh Karl Linn William Forster Lloyd William Morris Antonio Negri Elinor Ostrom Raj Patel John Platt (see Social trap) Joachim Radkau Kenneth Rexroth Gerrard Winstanley Michel Bauwens Vasilis Kostakis

Historical land commons movements[edit]

The Diggers Kett's Rebellion

Contemporary commons movements[edit]

Abahlali baseMjondolo
Abahlali baseMjondolo
in South Africa The Bhumi Uchhed Pratirodh Committee in India Electronic Frontier Foundation The EZLN
in Mexico Fanmi Lavalas
Fanmi Lavalas
in Haiti Geolibertarianism
primarily in the US The Homeless Workers' Movement
Homeless Workers' Movement
in Brazil The Land is Ours in the UK The Landless Workers' Movement
Landless Workers' Movement
in Brazil Movement for Justice en el Barrio in the United States
United States
of America Narmada Bachao Andolan
Narmada Bachao Andolan
in India Take Back the Land in the US

See also[edit]

Common good Common ownership Creative Commons Copyleft Common land
Common land
– Account of historical and present common land use, mainly British Isles. Global commons Game theory Homo reciprocans Network effect The Magic Cauldron – essay on the open source economic model Tragedy of the anticommons International Association for the Study of the Commons Patentleft Tyranny of small decisions


^ Basu, Soutrik; Jongerden, Joost; Ruivenkamp, Guido (17 March 2017). "Development of the drought tolerant variety Sahbhagi Dhan: exploring the concepts commons and community building". International Journal of the Commons. 11 (1): 144. doi:10.18352/ijc.673. Retrieved 6 September 2017.  ^ Digital library of the commons – Indiana University, retrieved 02/01/16 [1] ^ Frank van Laerhoven and Elinor Ostrom. "Traditions and Trends in the Study of the Commons". International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 1, no. 1, October 2007, pp. 3–28 ^ Anon. "Commoner". Farlex Inc. Retrieved 20 April 2012.  ^ a b Radkau 2008, p. 90, ff in the German text ^ Hartmut Zückert, "Allmende und Allmendaufhebung". Vergleichende Studien zum Spätmittelalter bis zu den Agrarreformen des 18./19. Jahrhunderts (= Quellen und Forschungen zur Agrargeschichte; Bd. 47), Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius 2003, IX + 462 S., 4 Farb-Abb., ISBN 978-3-8282-0226-9 review (in German) ^ Sneath, David. "State Policy and Pasture Degradation in Inner Asia". Science Magazine. Retrieved 11 May 2011.  ^ Ostrom, Elinor. "Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges". Science Magazine. Retrieved 11 May 2011.  ^ Acheson, James (2004). Capturing the Commons: Devising Institutions to Manage the Maine Lobster. University Press of New England. ISBN 9781584653936.  ^ Mehta, Trupti Parekh. "Community Forestry
in India
and Nepal". PERC Reports.  Missing or empty url= (help) ^ Davidson-Harden, Adam. "Local Control and Management of Our Water Commons: Stories of Rising to the Challenge" (PDF). www.ourwatercommons.org. Retrieved 11 May 2011.  ^ Huberman, Bernardo A. and Romero, Daniel M. and Wu, Fang, Crowdsourcing, Attention and Productivity (September 12, 2008). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1266996 ^ "Avoiding Tragedy in the Wiki-Commons", by Andrew George, 12 Va. J.L. & Tech. 8 (2007) ^ "Corporate Toxics Information Project". Political Economy Research Institute. PERI-Umass. Archived from the original on 2011-07-25.  ^ Ash, Michael. "Justice in the Air" (PDF). PERI. PERI- Umass.  ^ Fuster Morell, M. (2010, p. 5). Dissertation: Governance of online creation communities: Provision of infrastructure for the building of digital commons. http://www.onlinecreation.info/?page_id=338 ^ Berry, David (21 February 2005). "The commons". Free Software Magazine.  ^ Dellenbaugh-Losse, M. (2017). "What makes urban commons different from other commons?" Urban Policy. Retrieved December 28, 2017 ^ Sharing Cities: activating the Urban Commons. (2017). Mountain View: Shareable. Retrieved December 28, 2017 ^ Harvey, D. (2013). "Rebel cities: from the right to the city to the urban revolution". London: Verso ^ C. Iaione. "The city as a commons" (personal communication, November 9, 2016) [Blog post] ^ Dalakoglou, D. (2016). "Infrastructural Gap: Commons, State and Anthropology". City vol. 6 (2) ^ See also infra-demos ^ Basu, Soutrik; Jongerden, Joost; Ruivenkamp, Guido (17 March 2017). "Development of the drought tolerant variety Sahbhagi Dhan: exploring the concepts commons and community building". International Journal of the Commons. 11 (1): 144. doi:10.18352/ijc.673. Retrieved 6 September 2017.  ^ Basu, Soutrik; Jongerden, Joost; Ruivenkamp, Guido. "The emergence of a hybrid mode of knowledge production in the Generation Challenge Programme Rice Research Network (GCP-RRN) in India: Exploring the concept of Commons-Based Peer Production (CBPP)". Geoforum. 84: 107. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.008.  ^ Lloyd, William Forster (1833). Two Lectures on Population. JSTOR 1972412.  ^ Samuel Bowles: Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution, Princeton University Press, pp. 27–29 (2004) ISBN 0-691-09163-3 ^ The end of the commons as a watershed' The Age of Ecology, Joachim Radkau, John Wiley & Sons, 3 April 2014, p. 15 ff ^ Barnes, Peter (2000). Pie in the Sky. Washington D.C: Corporation for Enterprise Development. p. 1. ISBN 1-883187-32-X.  ^ a b Rifkin, Jeremy. "10 – Comedy of the Commons". The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative. Retrieved 2 February 2016.  ^ Elinor Ostrom
Elinor Ostrom
(2015). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. ISBN 9781107569782.  ^ NPR: Remembering Elinor Ostrom, Nobel Laureate Updated June 13, 201211:08 AM ET Published June 12, 20125:37 PM ET ^ a b Rose, Carol M. (1986). "The Comedy of the Commons: Commerce, Custom, and Inherently Public Property". Faculty Scholarship Series. Yale Law School: Paper 1828. Retrieved December 28, 2011.  ^ The Drama of the Commons
By Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Environmental Change and Society ^ "The Cornucopia
of the Commons: How to get volunteer labor". www.bricklin.com. Retrieved 2018-02-03.  ^ Silent Theft: The Private Plunder of Our Common Wealth By David Bollier ^ Cox, Susan Jane Buck (1985). "No Tragedy of the Commons" (PDF). Environmental Ethics. 7 (1): 49–61. doi:10.5840/enviroethics1985716.  ^ The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an … By Eric Raymond

Further reading[edit]

Basu, S., Jongerden, J. & Ruivenkamp, G., (2017). Development of the drought tolerant variety Sahbhagi Dhan: exploring the concepts commons and community building. International Journal of the Commons. 11(1), pp.144–170. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.673 Basu, S (2016). Knowledge production, Agriculture and Commons: The case of Generation Challenge Programme. (PhD Thesis). Netherlands: Wageningen University. Retrieved from http://edepot.wur.nl/377889. Basu, S (2014). An alternative imagination to study commons: beyond state and beyond scientific establishment. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Commons
for Sustainable Agricultural Innovations. Maringá, Brazil: Maringá State University. Bollier, David. "The Commons". Public Sphere Project. Schuler. Retrieved 26 October 2015. Bowers, Chet. (2006). Revitalizing the Commons: Cultural
and Educational Sites of Resistance and Affirmation. Lexington Books. Bowers, Chet. (2012). The Way Forward: Educational Reforms that Focus on the Cultural
and the Linguistic Roots of the Ecological Crisis. Eco-Justice Press. Dalakoglou, Dimitris "Infrastructural gap: Commons, State and Anthropology". City 20(6). Dellenbaugh, et. al. (2015). Urban Commons: Moving beyond State and Market. Birkhäuser. Fourier, Charles. (1996). The Theory of the Four Movements (Cambridge University Press) Gregg, Pauline. (2001). Free-Born John: A Biography of John Lilburne (Phoenix Press) Harvey, Neil. (1998). The Chiapas Rebellion: The Struggle for Land
and Democracy (Duke University Press) Hill, Christopher. (1984). The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution (Penguin) Hill, Christopher. (2006). Winstanley ‘The Law of Freedom’ and other Writings (Cambridge University Press) Hyde, Lewis. (2010). Common as Air: Revolution, Art and Ownership (Farrar, Straus and Giroux) Kennedy, Kennedy. (2008). Diggers, Levellers, and Agrarian Capitalism: Radical Political Thought in 17th Century England (Lexington Books) Kostakis, Vasilis and Bauwens, Michel. (2014). Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan). (wiki) Leaming, Hugo P. (1995). Hidden Americans: Maroons of Virginia and the Carolinas (Routledge) Linebaugh, Peter, and Marcus Rediker. (2000). The Many-Headed Hydra: Sailors, Slaves, Commoners, and the Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic (Boston: Beacon Press) Linebaugh, Peter. (2008). The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons
for All (University of California Press) Lummis, Douglas. (1997). Radical Democracy (Cornell University Press) Mitchel, John Hanson. (1998). Trespassing: An Inquiry into the Private Ownership
of Land
(Perseus Books) Neeson, J. M. (1996). Commoners: Common Right, Enclosure
and Social Change in England, 1700–1820 (Cambridge University Press) Negri, Antonio, and Michael Hardt. (2009). Commonwealth. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674060288 Newfont, Kathyn. (2012). Blue Ridge Commons: Environmental Activism and Forest
History in Western North Carolina (The University of Georgia Press) Patel, Raj. (2010). The Value of Nothing (Portobello Books) Price, Richard, ed. (1979). Maroon Societies: Rebel Slave Communities in the Americas (The Johns Hopkins University Press) Proudhon, Pierre-Joseph. (1994). What is Property? (Cambridge University Press) Rexroth, Kenneth. (1974). Communalism: From Its Origins to the Twentieth Century (Seabury Press) Rowe, Jonathan. (2013). Our Common Wealth: The Hidden Economy That Makes Everything Else Work (Berrett-Koehler) Shantz, Jeff. (2013). Commonist Tendencies: Mutual Aid Beyond Communism. (Punctum) Simon, Martin. (2014). Your Money or Your Life: time for both. Social Commons. (Freedom Favours)

External links[edit]

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Commons

IASC - The International Association for the Study of the Commons - an international association dedicated to the international and interdisciplinary study of commons and commons issues Foundation for common land – A gathering of those across Great Britain and beyond with a stake in pastoral commons and their future International Journal of the Commons
– an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed open-access journal dedicated to furthering the understanding of institutions for use and management of resources that are (or could be) enjoyed collectively. Infrastructuring the Commons
– Aalto University Special
Interest Group SIG in the Commons
(peer-production, co-production, co-governance, co-creation) and Public(s)services. The SIG addresses the relevance of the Commons
as a framework to expand the understanding of emerging considerations for the design, provision and maintenance of public services and urban space. Helsinki, Finland. On the Commons
– dedicated to exploring ideas and action about the commons—which encompasses natural assets such as oceans and clean air as well as cultural endowments like the Internet, scientific research and the arts. The Peer to Peer Foundation and the Economics and the Commons Conference. The Commons
Strategies Group. The Commons
Transition Primer. infra-demos is a project on infrastructures, commons and democracy. P2P Lab

v t e


By owner

Communal land Marital property (USA) Cooperative Estate in land Private Public State Crown land

By nature

Croft Intangible Intellectual


Personal Tangible

immovable real

Common resources

Common land Common-pool resource Digital Global Information Knowledge


Bundle of rights Commodity

fictitious commodities

Common good (economics) Excludability First possession

appropriation homestead principle

Free rider problem Game theory Georgism Gift economy Labor theory of property Law of rent


Legal plunder Natural
rights Ownership

common customary self state


primogeniture usufruct women's

Right to property Rivalry Tragedy of the commons



(watercourse) Ejido
(agrarian land) Forest
types Inheritance Land
tenure Property

alienation easement restraint on alienation real estate title


Air Fishing Forest-dwelling (India) Freedom to roam Grazing


Hunting Land

aboriginal indigenous squatting

Littoral Mineral


Right of way Water

prior-appropriation riparian

Disposession/ redistribution

Bioprospecting Collectivization Eminent domain Enclosure Eviction Expropriation Farhud Forced migration

population transfer

Illegal fishing Illegal logging Land
reform Legal plunder Piracy Poaching Primitive accumulation Privatization Regulatory taking Slavery

bride-buying human trafficking wage wife selling


inheritance poll progressive property


Scholars (key work)

Frédéric Bastiat Ronald Coase Henry George Garrett Hardin David Harvey John Locke

Two Treatises of Government

Karl Marx Marcel Mauss

The Gift

John Stuart Mill Elinor Ostrom Karl Polanyi

The Great Transformation

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

What Is Property?

David Ricardo Murray N. Rothbard

The Ethics of Liberty

Jean-Jacques Rousseau

The Social Contract

Adam Smith

The Wealth of Nations

Categories: Property Property

by country

v t e

Environmental social science


Ecological anthropology Ecological economics Environmental anthropology Environmental economics Environmental communication Environmental history Environmental politics Environmental psychology Environmental sociology Human ecology Human geography Political ecology Regional science


Agroecology Anthrozoology Behavioral geography Community studies Demography Design

ecological environmental

Ecological humanities Economics

energy thermo


education ethics law science studies


botany ecology zoology

Forestry Industrial ecology Integrated geography Permaculture Rural sociology Science, technology and society

science studies


science studies

Systems ecology Urban

ecology geography metabolism studies



landscape sustainable

Ecopsychology Engineering

ecological environmental

Green criminology Health

environmental epidemiology occupational public


environmental fisheries forest natural resource waste


environmental land use regional spatial urban


energy environmental

Environment portal Category Concepts Degrees Journals Research institutes Scholars

v t e



Pollution / quality

Ambient standards (USA) Index Indoor

developing nations


Clean Air Act (USA)

Ozone depletion


Airshed Trading Deforestation (REDD)


Law Resources Fossil fuels (peak oil) Geothermal Nuclear Solar

sunlight shade

Tidal Wave Wind



peak farmland

Degradation Law



habitat conservation



law sand

peak rights


conservation fertility health resilience


planning reserve


Biodiversity Bioprospecting Biosphere Bushfood Bushmeat Fisheries

law management

Food Forests

genetic resources law management



Gene bank Herbalist plants Marine conservation Non-timber forest products Rangeland Seed bank Wildlife

conservation management



Types / location


storage and recovery

Drinking Fresh Groundwater

pollution recharge remediation

Hydrosphere Ice

bergs glacial polar

Irrigation Rain


Stormwater Surface water Wastewater



Desalination Floods Law Leaching Sanitation Conflict Conservation Peak water Pollution Privatization Quality Right Resources

management policy



enclosure global land tragedy of


ecological land

Ecosystem services Exploitation

overexploitation Earth Overshoot Day





Nature reserve Systems ecology Urban ecology Wilderness


Common-pool Conflict (perpetuation) Curse Depletion Extraction Nationalism Renewable / Non-renewable


Agriculture and agronomy Energy Environment Fishing Forestry Mining Water Wetlands


agencies law management ministries organizations