
In the
military science of
ballistics, circular error probable (CEP) (also circular error probability or circle of equal probability) is a measure of a weapon system's
precision. It is defined as the radius of a circle; centered on the mean, whose boundary is expected to include the landing points of 50% of the rounds; said otherwise, it is the
median error radius. That is, if a given munitions design has a CEP of 100 m, when 100 are targeted at the same point, 50 will fall within a circle with a radius of 100 m around their average impact point. (The distance between the target point and the average impact point is referred to as
bias.)
There are associated concepts, such as the DRMS (distance root mean square), which is the square root of the average squared distance error, and R95, which is the radius of the circle where 95% of the values would fall in.
The concept of CEP also plays a role when measuring the accuracy of a position obtained by a navigation system, such as
GPS or older systems such as
LORAN and
Loran-C.
Concept

The original concept of CEP was based on a
circular bivariate normal distribution (CBN) with CEP as a parameter of the CBN just as μ and σ are parameters of the
normal distribution.
Munitions with this distribution behavior tend to cluster around the
mean impact point, with most reasonably close, progressively fewer and fewer further away, and very few at long distance. That is, if CEP is ''n'' metres, 50% of shots land within ''n'' metres of the mean impact, 43.7% between ''n'' and ''2n'', and 6.1% between ''2n'' and ''3n'' metres, and the proportion of shots that land farther than three times the CEP from the mean is only 0.2%.
CEP is not a good measure of accuracy when this distribution behavior is not met.
Precision-guided munitions generally have more "close misses" and so are not normally distributed. Munitions may also have larger
standard deviation of range errors than the standard deviation of azimuth (deflection) errors, resulting in an elliptical
confidence region. Munition samples may not be exactly on target, that is, the mean vector will not be (0,0). This is referred to as
bias.
To incorporate accuracy into the CEP concept in these conditions, CEP can be defined as the square root of the
mean square error (MSE). The MSE will be the sum of the
variance of the range error plus the variance of the azimuth error plus the
covariance of the range error with the azimuth error plus the square of the bias. Thus the MSE results from pooling all these sources of error, geometrically corresponding to
radius of a
circle within which 50% of rounds will land.
Several methods have been introduced to estimate CEP from shot data. Included in these methods are the plug-in approach of Blischke and Halpin (1966), the Bayesian approach of Spall and Maryak (1992), and the maximum likelihood approach of Winkler and Bickert (2012). The Spall and Maryak approach applies when the shot data represent a mixture of different projectile characteristics (e.g., shots from multiple munitions types or from multiple locations directed at one target).
Conversion
While 50% is a very common definition for CEP, the circle dimension can be defined for percentages.
Percentiles can be determined by recognizing that the horizontal position error is defined by a 2D vector which components are two
uncorrelated orthogonal
Gaussian random variables (one for each axis) each having a standard deviation
. The distance error is the magnitude of that vector; it is a property of
2D Gaussian vectors that the magnitude follows the
Rayleigh distribution, with a standard deviation
, which by definition is the DRMS (distance root mean square) value. In turn, the properties of the
Rayleigh distribution are, that its
percentile at level