HOME
The Info List - Byzantine Diplomacy


--- Advertisement ---



Byzantine diplomacy
Byzantine diplomacy
concerns the principles, methods, mechanisms, ideals, and techniques that the Byzantine Empire
Byzantine Empire
espoused and used in order to negotiate with other states and to promote the goals of its foreign policy. Dimitri Obolensky
Dimitri Obolensky
asserts that the preservation of civilization in Eastern Europe
Eastern Europe
was due to the skill and resourcefulness of Byzantine diplomacy, which remains one of Byzantium's lasting contributions to the history of Europe and the Middle East.[1]

Contents

1 Challenges and goals 2 Principles and methods 3 See also 4 References 5 Sources

Challenges and goals[edit] Further information: Byzantine-Mongol alliance
Byzantine-Mongol alliance
and Sino-Roman relations After the fall of Rome, the key challenge to the Byzantine Empire
Byzantine Empire
was to maintain a set of relations between itself and its sundry neighbors, including the Persians, Georgians, Iberians, the Germanic peoples, the Bulgars, the Slavs, the Armenians, the Huns, the Avars, the Franks, the Lombards, and the Arabs, that embodied and so maintained its imperial status. All these neighbors lacked a key resource that Byzantium had taken over from Rome, namely a formalized legal structure. When they set about forging formal political institutions, they were dependent on the empire. Whereas classical writers are fond of making a sharp distinction between peace and war, for the Byzantines diplomacy was a form of war by other means. Anticipating Niccolò Machiavelli
Niccolò Machiavelli
and Carl von Clausewitz, Byzantine historian John Kinnamos writes, "Since many and various matters lead toward one end, victory, it is a matter of indifference which one uses to reach it." With a regular army of 120,000-140,000 men after the losses of the seventh century,[2] the empire's security depended on activist diplomacy. Byzantium's "Bureau of Barbarians" was the first foreign intelligence agency, gathering information on the empire’s rivals from every imaginable source.[3] While on the surface a protocol office—its main duty was to ensure foreign envoys were properly cared for and received sufficient state funds for their maintenance, and it kept all the official translators—it clearly had a security function as well. On Strategy, from the 6th century, offers advice about foreign embassies: "[Envoys] who are sent to us should be received honourably and generously, for everyone holds envoys in high esteem. Their attendants, however, should be kept under surveillance to keep them from obtaining any information by asking questions of our people."[4] Principles and methods[edit]

Byzantine culture

Aristocracy and bureaucracy Army Art Architecture Calendar Coinage Cuisine Dance Diplomacy Dress Economy Gardens Law Literature Medicine Music Navy People Science

v t e

Omurtag, ruler of Bulgaria, sends delegation to Byzantine emperor Michael II
Michael II
( Madrid
Madrid
Skylitzes, Biblioteca Nacional de España, Madrid).

Byzantine diplomacy
Byzantine diplomacy
drew its neighbors into a network of international and interstate relations, controlled by the empire itself.[5] This process revolved around treaty making. Byzantine historian Evangelos Chrysos postulates a three-layered process at work: 1) the new ruler was welcomed into the family of kings, 2) there was an assimilation of Byzantine social attitudes and values, 3) as a formalization of the second layer of the process, there were laws.[6] In order to drive this process, the Byzantines availed themselves of a number of mostly diplomatic practices. For example, embassies to Constantinople
Constantinople
would often stay on for years. A member of other royal houses would routinely be requested to stay in Constantinople, not only as a potential hostage, but also as a useful pawn in case political conditions where he came from changed. Another key practice was to overwhelm visitors by sumptuous displays. Constantinople's riches served the state's diplomatic purposes as a means of propaganda, and as a way to impress foreigners.[7] When Liutprand of Cremona was sent as an ambassador to the Byzantine capital, he was overwhelmed by the imperial residence, the luxurious meals, and acrobatic entertainment. Special
Special
care was taken to stimulate as many of the senses in as high degree as possible: brightly lit things to see, terrifying sounds, tasty food; even the diplomatic set-piece of having barbarians standing around the throne wearing their native gear.[8] The fact that Byzantium in its dealings with the barbarians generally preferred diplomacy to war is not surprising. For the East Romans, faced with the ever-present necessity of having to battle on two fronts — in the east against Persians, Arabs
Arabs
and Turks, in the north against the Slavs
Slavs
and the steppe nomads — knew from personal experience how expensive war is both in money and manpower.[1] The Byzantines were skilled at using diplomacy as a weapon of war. If the Bulgars
Bulgars
threatened, subsidies could be given to the Kiev Rus. A Rus threat could be countered by subsidies to the Patzinaks. If the Patzinaks
Patzinaks
proved troublesome, the Cumans
Cumans
or Uzès
Uzès
could be contacted. There was always someone to the enemy’s rear in a position to appreciate the emperor's largesse. Another innovative principle of Byzantine diplomacy
Byzantine diplomacy
was effective interference in the internal affairs of other states. In 1282, Michael VIII
Michael VIII
sponsored a revolt in Sicily against Charles of Anjou
Charles of Anjou
called the Sicilian Vespers. Emperor Heraclius
Heraclius
once intercepted a message from Persian rival Khosrau II which ordered the execution of a general. Heraclius
Heraclius
added 400 names to the message and diverted the messenger, provoking a rebellion by those on the list. The emperor maintained a stable of pretenders to almost every foreign throne. These could be given funds and released to wreak havoc if their homeland threatened attack.[3] See also[edit]

De Administrando Imperio

References[edit]

^ a b Obolensky 1994, "The Principles and Methods of Byzantine Diplomacy", p. 3. ^ Gabriel 2002, p. 281; Haldon 1999, p. 101. ^ a b Antonucci 1993, pp. 11–13. ^ Dennis 1985, Anonymous, Byzantine Military Treatise on Strategy, para. 43, p. 125. ^ Neumann 2005, pp. 869–870. ^ Shepard & Franklin 1992, Evangelos Chrysos, "Byzantine Diplomacy, A.D. 300–800: Means and Ends", p. 35. ^ Laiou 2002, "Writing the Economic History of Byzantium", p. 3. ^ Neumann 2005, pp. 870–871.

Sources[edit]

Antonucci, Michael (February 1993). "War by Other Means: The Legacy of Byzantium". History Today. 43 (2).  Dennis, George T. (1985). Three Byzantine Military Treatises (Volume 9). Washington, District of Columbia: Dumbarton Oaks, Research Library and Collection.  Gabriel, Richard A. (2002). The Great Armies of Antiquity. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-275-97809-5.  Haldon, John F. (1999). Warfare, State and Society in the Byzantine World, 565-1204. London, United Kingdom: University College London Press. ISBN 1-85728-495-X.  Laiou, Angeliki E. (2002). The Economic History of Byzantium: From the Seventh through the Fifteenth Century. 34. Washington, District of Columbia: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection. ISBN 0-88402-288-9.  Neumann, Iver B. (August 2005). "Sublime Diplomacy: Byzantine, Early Modern, Contemporary" (PDF). Millennium: Journal of International Studies. Netherlands Institute of International Relations 'Clingendael'. 34 (3): 865–888. doi:10.1177/03058298060340030201. ISSN 1569-2981.  Obolensky, Dimitri (1974) [1971]. The Byzantine Commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500-1453. London: Cardinal.  Obolensky, Dimitri (1994). Byzantium and the Slavs. Crestwood, New York: St Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 0-88141-008-X.  Shepard, Jonathan; Franklin, Simon (1992). Byzantine Diplomacy: Papers from the Twenty-Fourth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Cambridge, March 1990. Aldershot, Hampshire: Variorum. ISBN 0-86078-338-3. 

v t e

Byzantine Empire
Byzantine Empire
topics

History

Preceding

Roman Empire

Dominate

(330–717) Early

Constantinian-Valentinian era ( Constantinian dynasty - Valentinian dynasty) Theodosian era Leonid era Justinian era Heraclian era Twenty Years' Anarchy

(717–1204) Middle

Isaurian era Nikephorian era Amorian era Macedonian era Doukid era Komnenian era Angelid era

(1204–1453) Late

Fourth Crusade Frankokratia
Frankokratia
represented by Latin Empire Byzantine Successor States (Nicaea / Epirus–Thessalonica / Morea / Trebizond) Palaiologan era Decline of the Byzantine Empire Fall of Constantinople

Governance

Central

Emperors

Basileus Autokrator

Senate Imperial bureaucracy Eparch

Early

Praetorian prefects Magister officiorum Comes sacrarum largitionum Comes rerum privatarum Quaestor sacri palatii

Middle

Logothetes tou dromou Sakellarios Logothetes tou genikou Logothetes tou stratiotikou Chartoularios tou sakelliou Chartoularios tou vestiariou Epi tou eidikou Protasekretis Epi ton deeseon

Late

Megas logothetes Mesazon

Provincial

Early

Praetorian prefectures Dioceses Provinces Quaestura exercitus Exarchate of Ravenna Exarchate of Africa

Middle

Themata Kleisourai Bandon Catepanates

Late

Kephale Despotates

Diplomacy

Treaties Diplomats

Military

Army

Battle tactics Military manuals Wars Battles Revolts Siege warfare Generals Mercenaries

Early

Late Roman army East Roman army

Foederati Bucellarii Scholae Palatinae Excubitors

Middle

Themata Kleisourai Tourma Droungos Bandon Tagmata Domestic of the Schools Hetaireia Akritai Varangian Guard

Late

Komnenian army

Pronoia Vestiaritai

Palaiologan army

Allagion Paramonai

Grand Domestic

Navy

Karabisianoi Maritime themata

Cibyrrhaeot Aegean Sea Samos

Dromon Greek fire Droungarios of the Fleet Megas doux Admirals Naval battles

Religion and law

Religion

Eastern Orthodox Church Byzantine Rite Ecumenical councils Saints Patriarchate of Constantinople Arianism Monophysitism Paulicianism Iconoclasm Great Schism Bogomilism Hesychasm Mount Athos Missionary activity

Bulgaria Moravia Serbs Kievan Rus'

Jews Muslims

Law

Codex Theodosianus Corpus Juris Civilis Ecloga Basilika Hexabiblos Mutilation

Culture and society

Architecture

Secular Sacred

Cross-in-square Domes

Constantinople

Great Palace of Constantinople Blachernae Palace Hagia Sophia Hagia Irene Chora Church Pammakaristos Church City Walls

Thessalonica

Arch of Galerius and Rotunda Hagios Demetrios Hagia Sophia Panagia Chalkeon

Ravenna

San Vitale Sant'Apollinare in Classe Sant'Apollinare Nuovo

Other locations

Daphni Monastery Hosios Loukas Nea Moni of Chios Saint Catherine's Monastery Mystras

Art

Icons Enamel Glass Mosaics Painters Macedonian period art Komnenian renaissance

Economy

Agriculture Coinage Mints Trade

silk Silk Road Varangians

Dynatoi

Literature

Novel Acritic songs

Digenes Akritas

Alexander romance Historians

Everyday life

Calendar Cuisine Dance Dress Flags and insignia Hippodrome Music

Octoechos

People

Byzantine Greeks

Slavery Units of measurement

Science Learning

Encyclopedias Inventions Medicine Philosophy

Neoplatonism

Scholars University

Impact

Byzantine commonwealth Byzantine studies Museums Byzantinism Cyrillic script Neo-Byzantine architecture Greek scholars in the Renaissance Third Rome Megali Idea

Byzan

.