The Info List - Buddha-nature

--- Advertisement ---

(i) (i) (i)


* Dōgen * Hakuin Ekaku


* Taego Bou * Jinul * Daewon * Seongcheol


* D. T. Suzuki * Hakuun Yasutani
Hakuun Yasutani
* Taizan Maezumi
Taizan Maezumi
* Shunryū Suzuki * Seungsahn

_Category: Zen
Buddhists _


* Zen
and Sutras * Doctrinal background of Zen
* Buddha-nature * Yogacara
* Śūnyatā * Bodhisattva


* Dharma
transmission * Zen
lineage charts * Zen
ranks and hierarchy * Zen
organisation and institutions * Zen


* Kenshō * Satori
* Sudden Enlightenment * Shikantaza


* Ten Ox-Herding Pictures * Five ranks of Tozan * Three mysterious Gates * Four Ways of Knowing


* Zazen
/ Shikantaza * Kōan practice


* East Mountain Teaching * Hongzhou school
Hongzhou school
* Five Houses of Chán * Rinzai school * Sōtō school * Sanbo Kyodan
Sanbo Kyodan
* White Plum Asanga

Related schools

* Huayan * Tiantai * Pure Land Buddhism

* v * t * e

BUDDHA-NATURE or BUDDHA PRINCIPLE refers to several related terms, most notably _tathāgatagarbha_ and _buddhadhātu_. _Tathāgatagarbha_ means "the womb" or "embryo" (_garbha_) of the "thus-gone" (_tathagata_), or "containing a tathagata", while _buddhadhātu_ literally means "Buddha-realm" or "Buddha-substrate". The terms refer to the notion that the luminous mind of the Buddhas is inherently present in every sentient being, and will shine forth when it is cleansed of the defilements, c.q. when the nature of mind is recognised for what it is.


* 1 Etymology

* 1.1 Tathāgatagarbha

* 1.1.1 Compound * 1.1.2 Asian translations * 1.1.3 Western translations

* 1.2 Buddha-nature

* 2 Indian origins

* 2.1 Awakened Mind

* 2.1.1 Luminous mind * 2.1.2 Pure consciousness

* 2.2 Dharma-dhātu - The realm of the Buddha

* 2.2.1 Lotus Sutra * 2.2.2 _Avatamsaka Sutra_ and universal Buddhahood
* 2.2.3 Trikaya

* 3 Tathāgatagarbha Sutras - the essence or potentiality of Buddhahood

* 3.1 _Tathāgatagarbha Sūtra_ * 3.2 _Śrīmālādevī Siṃhanāda Sūtra_ * 3.3 _Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra_ * 3.4 _Ratnagotravibhāga_ or _Uttaratantraśāstra_

* 4 Connecting the concepts

* 4.1 Tathagatagarbha and Alayavijnana

* 4.1.1 Abhidhamma - The seed of awakening * 4.1.2 Yogacara
* 4.1.3 _Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra_

* 4.2 Tathāgatagarbha and Buddhadhātu

* 5 Popularisation in Chinese Buddhism

* 5.1 Early Chinese Buddhism
* 5.2 The Awakening of Faith * 5.3 Chan Buddhism

* 6 Korean Buddhism

* 7 Japanese Buddhism

* 7.1 Nichiren
* 7.2 Zen
* 7.3 Shin Buddhism

* 8 Tibetan Buddhism

* 8.1 Gelug

* 8.2 Nyingma

* 8.2.1 Dzogchen

* 8.3 Kagyu * 8.4 Jonang * 8.5 The Rimé movement
Rimé movement

* 9 Modern scholarship

* 9.1 Essential self * 9.2 Sunyata * 9.3 Critical Buddhism
* 9.4 Multiple meanings

* 10 See also * 11 Notes * 12 References * 13 Sources * 14 Further reading * 15 External links



The term _tathāgatagarbha_ may mean "embryonic tathāgata", "womb of the tathāgata", or "containing a tathagata". Various meanings may all be brought into mind when the term _tathagatagarbha_ is being used.


The Sanskrit
term _tathāgatagarbha_ is a compound of two terms, _tathāgata _ and _garbha_:

* _tathāgata_ means "the one thus gone", referring to the Buddha. It is composed of "_tathā_" and "_āgata", "thus come"_, or _"tathā"_ and _"gata"_, _"thus gone"_. The term refers to a Buddha, who has "thus gone" from samsara into nirvana, and "thus come" from nirvana into samsara to work for the salvation of all sentient beings.

* _garbha_, "womb", "embryo", "center", "essence".

Asian Translations

The Chinese translated the term _tathāgatagarbha_ as (traditional Chinese : 如来藏; ; pinyin : _rúláizàng_, or "Tathāgata's (_rúlái_) storehouse" (_zàng_). According to Brown, "storehouse" may indicate both "that which enfolds or contains something", or "that which is itself enfolded, hidden or contained by another." The Tibetan translation is _de bzhin gsegs pa'i snyin po_, which cannot be translated as "womb" (_mngal_ or _lhums_), but as "embryonic essence", "kernel" or "heart". The term "heart" was also used by Mongolian translators.

Western Translations

The term _tathagatagarbha_ is translated and interpreted in various ways by western translators and scholars:

* According to Sally King, the term _tathāgatagarbha_ may be understood in two ways:

* "embryonic tathāgata", the incipient Buddha, the _cause_ of the Tathāgata, * "womb of the tathāgata", the _fruit_ of Tathāgata.

According to King, the Chinese _rúláizàng_ was taken in its meaning as "womb" or "fruit".

* Wayman & Wayman also point out that the Chinese regularly takes _garbha_ as "womb", but prefer to use the term "embryo". * According to Brown, following Wayman ; pinyin : _fóxìng_, Japanese : busshō ) is closely related in meaning to the term _tathāgatagarbha_, but is not a translation of this term. it refers to that what is essential in the human being.

The corresponding Sanskrit
term is _buddhadhātu_. It has two meanings, namely the nature of the Buddha, equivalent to the term dharmakāya , and the cause of the Buddha The link between the cause and the result is the nature (_dhātu_) which is common to both, namely the dharmadhātu.

Matsumoto Shirō also points out that "Buddha-nature" translates the Sanskrit-term buddhadhātu, a "place to put something," a "foundation," a "locus." According to Shirō, it does not mean "original nature" or "essence," nor does it mean the "possibility of the attainment of Buddhahood," "the original nature of the Buddha," or "the essence of the Buddha."

In the Vajrayana
, the term for Buddha-nature
is _sugatagarbha_.


The idea of Buddha-nature
originated in India, and was further developed in China, due to the different culture Buddhism
had to adapt to. It was the result of an interplay between various strands of Buddhist thought, on the nature of human consciousness and the means of awakening.


Luminous Mind

According to Wayman, the idea of the tathagatagarbha is grounded on sayings by the Buddha that there is an innately pure luminous mind (prabhasvara citta ), "which is only adventitiously covered over by defilements (agantukaklesa )" This luminous mind is being mentioned in the Anguttara Nikaya : "Luminous, monks, is the mind. And it is defiled by incoming defilements."

The Mahāsāṃghika coupled this idea of the luminous mind with the idea of the mulavijnana , the substratum consciousness that serves as the basis consciousness.

Pure Consciousness

From the idea of the luminous mind emerged the idea that the awakened mind is the pure, undefiled mind. In the tathagatagarbha-sutras it is this pure consciousness that is regarded to be the seed from which Buddhahood

When this intrinsically pure consciousness came to be regarded as an element capable of growing into Buddhahood
, there was the "embryo (_garbha_) of the Tathagata (=Buddha)" doctrine, whether or not this term is employed.

Gregory comments on this origin of the Tathagatagarba-doctrine: "The implication of this doctrine is that enlightenment is the natural and true state of the mind."

The early Buddha-nature
concept as expressed in the seminal 'tathagatagarbha sutra' named the _ Nirvana Sutra_ is, according to Kevin Trainor, as follows: "Sentient beings are said to possess a sacred nature that is the basis for them becoming buddhas this buddha-nature is in fact our true nature universal and completely unsullied by whatever psychological and karmic state an individual may be in."


developed new ideas on the appearance of the Buddha. These ideas first appeared in the Lotus Sutra, which distinguishes between the heavenly Buddha and earthly Buddhas.

Lotus Sutra

The _ Lotus Sutra _, written between 100 BCE and 200 CE, further developed and popularized the doctrine of the Buddha-nature. It influenced subsequent later sutras.

The tenth chapter emphasizes, in accordance with the Bodhisattva-ideal of the Mahayana
teachings, that everyone can be liberated. All living beings can become a buddha, not only monks and nuns, but also laypeople, śrāvakas , bodhisattvas , and non-human creatures. It also details that all living beings can be a 'teacher of the Dharma'.

The twelfth chapter of the _Lotus Sutra_ details that Buddha-nature is universal among all people, even the historical Devadatta
has the potential to become a buddha. The story of Devadatta
is followed by another story about a dragon princess who is both a nāga and a female, whom the bodhisattva Mañjuśrī proclaims will reach enlightenment immediately, in her present form.

_Avatamsaka Sutra_ And Universal Buddhahood

According to Wayman, the _Avataṃsaka Sūtra _ (1st-3rd century CE) was the next step in the development of the Buddha-nature
thought after the concept of the luminous mind:

here it is taught that the Buddha's divine knowledge pervades sentient beings, and that its representation in an individual being is the substratum consciousness.

The _Avataṃsaka Sūtra_ does not contain a "singular discussion of the concept", but the idea of "a universal penetration of sentient beings by the wisdom of the Buddha (_buddhajñāna_)" was complementary to the concept of the Buddha-womb. The basic idea of the _Avataṃsaka Sūtra_ is the unity of the absolute and the relative:

All in One, One in All. The All melts into a single whole. There are no divisions in the totality of reality t views the cosmos as holy, as "one bright pearl," the universal reality of the Buddha. The universal Buddhahood
of all reality is the religious message of the Avatamsaka-sutra.

All levels of reality are related and interpenetrated. This is depicted in the image of Indra\'s net . This "unity in totality allows every individual entity of the phenomenal world its uniqueness without attributing an inherent nature to anything".


Around 300 CE, the Yogacara
school systematized the prevalent ideas on the nature of the Buddha in the Trikaya
or _three-body doctrine_. According to this doctrine, Buddhahood
has three aspects:

* The Nirmana-kaya, or _Transformation-body_, the earthly manifestation of the Buddha * The Sambhogakāya , or _Enjoyment-body_, a subtle body, by which the Buddha appears to bodhisattvas to teach them * The Dharmakāya, or _Dharma-body_, the ultimate nature of the Buddha, and to the ultimate nature of reality

They may be described as follows:

The first is the 'Knowledge-body' (_Jnana-kaya_), the inner nature shared by all Buddhas, their Buddha-ness (_buddhata_) The second aspect of the _Dharma-body_ is the 'Self-existent-body' (_Svabhavika-kaya_). This is the ultimate nature of reality, thusness, emptiness: the non-nature which is the very nature of _dharmas_, their _dharma_-ness (_dharmata_). It is the _Tathagata-garbha_ and _bodhicitta _ hidden within beings, and the transformed 'storehouse-consciousness'.


Main article: Tathāgatagarbha sūtras

The tathāgatagarbha sūtras originated in India, but their ideas were more influential in the development of East Asian Buddhism
. The earliest tathāgatagarbha sūtra is the _ Tathāgatagarbha Sūtra _. The most important of those sutras is _Śrīmālādevī Siṃhanāda Sūtra _. Another influential sutra, especially in Chinese thought, is the _ Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra _. The Uttaratantra gives a synthesis of tathāgatagarbha-thought, and gives an overview of authoritative tathāgatagarbha sutras.


The _Tathāgatagarbha Sūtra_ (200-250 CE) is considered (...) "the earliest expression of this (the tathāgatagarbha doctrine) and the term _tathāgatagarbha_ itself seems to have been coined in this very sutra." It states that one is already or primordially awakened.


The _Śrīmālādevī Siṃhanāda Sūtra_ (3rd century CE ), also named _The Lion's Roar of Queen Srimala_, centers on the teaching of the tathagatagarbha as "ultimate soteriological principle". Regarding the tathāgatagarbha, it states:

Lord, the Tathagatagarbha is neither self nor sentient being, nor soul, nor personality. The Tathagatagarbha is not the domain of beings who fall into the belief in a real personality, who adhere to wayward views, whose thoughts are distracted by voidness. Lord, this Tathagatagarbha is the embryo of the Illustrious Dharmadhatu, the embryo of the Dharmakaya, the embryo of the supramundane _dharma_, the embryo of the intrinsically pure _dharma_.

In the _Śrīmālādevī Siṃhanāda Sūtra_ there are two possible states for the tathāgatagarbha:

ither covered by defilements, when it is called only "embryo of the Tathagata"; or free from defilements, when the "embryo of the Tathagata" is no more the "embryo" (potentiality) but the Tathagata (actuality).

The sutra itself states it this way:

This Dharmakaya of the Tathagata when not free from the store of defilement is referred to as the Tathagatagarbha.


The _Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra_ (written 2nd century CE) was very influential in the Chinese reception of the Buddhist teachings. According to Shimoda Masahiro, the authors of the _Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra_ were leaders and advocates of stupa worship. The term _buddhadhātu_ originally referred to relics. In the _Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra_, it came to be used in place of the concept of _tathāgatagārbha_. The authors used the teachings of the _Tathāgatagarbha Sūtra_ to reshape the worship of the physical relics of the Buddha into worship of the inner Buddha as a principle of salvation. Sasaki, in a review of Shimoda, conveys a key premise of Shimoda's work, namely, that the origins of Mahayana
and the _ Nirvana Sutra_ are entwined.

According to Sallie B. King, it does not represent a major innovation, and is rather unsystematic, which made it "a fruitful one for later students and commentators, who were obliged to create their own order and bring it to the text". According to King, its most important innovation is the linking of the term _buddhadhatu_ with _tathagatagarbha_. The sutra presents the Buddha-nature
or tathagatagarbha as a "Self". The _Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra_ refers to a true self. "The _Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṅa Sūtra_, especially influential in East Asian Buddhist thought, goes so far as to speak of it as our true self (ātman). Its precise metaphysical and ontolo-gical status is, however, open to interpretation in the terms of different Mahāyāna philosophical schools; for the Madhyamikas it must be empty of its own existence like everything else; for the Yogacarins, following the Laṅkāvatāra, it can be identified with store consciousness, as the receptacle of the seeds of awakening. Paul Williams states: " it is obvious that the _Mahaparinirvana Sutra_ does not consider it impossible for a Buddhist to affirm an atman provided it is clear what the correct understanding of this concept is, and indeed the sutra clearly sees certain advantages in doing so." but it speaks about Buddha-nature
in so many different ways, that Chinese scholars created a list of types of Buddha-nature
that could be found in the text. Paul Williams also notes:

Nevertheless the sutra as it stands is quite clear that while we can speak of as Self, actually it is not at all a Self, and those who have such Self-notions cannot perceive the tathagatagarbha and thus become enlightened (see Ruegg 1989a: 21-6).


The Ratnagotravibhāga, also called _Uttaratantraśāstra_ (5th century CE), is a śāstra (commentary) in which

he various insights and developments of the above texts (all of which served as its sources) were to be comprehensively synthesised into the most authoritatively complete analysis of the tathāgatagārbha theory.

It gives an overview of authoritative tathāgatagarbha sutras, mentioning the _Tathāgatagarbha Sūtra_, the _Śrīmālādevī Siṃhanāda Sūtra_, _Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra_, the _ Aṅgulimālīya Sūtra _, the _ Anunatva-Apurnatva-Nirdesa _ and the _Mahābherīharaka-sūtra_. It presents the tathāgatagarbha as "an ultimate, unconditional reality that is simultaneously the inherent, dynamic process towards its complete manifestation". Mundane and enlightened reality are seen as complementary:

Thusness defiled is the Tathagatagarbha, and Thusness undefiled is Enlightenment.

According to the _Ratnagotravibhāga_, all sentient have "the embryo of the Tathagata" in three senses:

* the Tathāgata's dharmakāya permeates all sentient beings; * the Tathāgata's _tathatā _ is omnipresent (_avyatibheda_); * the Tathāgata's species (_gotra_, a synonym for tathagatagarbha) occurs in them.

The Ratnagotravibhāga equates enlightenment with the nirvāṇa-realm and the dharmakāya. It gives a variety of synonyms for _garbha_, the most frequently used being _gotra_ and _dhatu_.



According to Kalupahana, the Madhyamaka
of Nagarjuna
, but also the Yogacara
of Vasubandhu
are a later reaction to the "emergence of absolutist tendencies". Nagarjuna's work is founded on the prajnaparamita-sutras, which reach back to the anatman doctrine. ,

Abhidhamma - The Seed Of Awakening

The Buddha-nature
doctrine may be traced back, in part, to the _abhidharmic _ debates over metaphysics. Those arose among the _Nikāya _ schools as they attempted to reconcile various perceived problems.

One problem is how to integrate the doctrine of _anatta_ with the idea of karma and rebirth . The anatta-doctrine stipulates that there is no underlying self, while the idea of karma and rebirth seems to implicate an underlying essence that's being reborn. A solution to this problem was the proposition of the existence of _karmic seeds_. The karmic effects of the human deeds lie dormant, as seeds, until they germinate in this or a next life. Not an individual self, but these karmic seeds are the base for the generation of a following life.

This concept of "seeds" was espoused by the Sautrāntika in debate with the Sarvāstivādins over the metaphysical status of phenomena (_dharmas_). It is a precursor to the ālaya-vijñāna, the store-consciousness of the Yogācāra school which contains all these seeds. Originally ālaya-vijñāna simply meant defiled consciousness: defiled by the workings of the five senses and the mind . It was also seen as the mūla-vijñāna, the base-consciousness or "stream of consciousness" from which awareness and perception spring.

According to Yogacara, awakening is the result of a seed that comes from _outside_ the human psyche, namely by hearing the teaching.


See also: Transformations of consciousness

gives an analysis of the workings of the human mind and consciousness, based on the analysis of the working of the five skandhas . Vasubandhu's original analysis leaves ample room for the proposition of a transcendent essence , but was interpreted in an idealist way by later followers.

To account for the notion of Buddha-nature
in all beings, with the Yogacara
belief in the Five Categories of Beings , Yogacara
scholars in China such as Tz'u-en (慈恩, 632-682) the first patriarch in China, advocated two types of nature: the latent nature found in all beings (理佛性) and the Buddha-nature
in practice (行佛性). The latter nature was determined by the innate seeds listed above.

_Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra_

The _ Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra _ (compiled 350-400 CE ) synthesized the tathagatagarba-doctrine and the ālāya-vijñāna doctrine. The Lankavatara Sutra
"assimilates Tathagata-garbha thought to the Yogacara-viewpoint, and this assimilation is further developed in The Treatise on the Awakening of Faith in the Mahayana". According to the Lankavatara Sutra
_tathāgatagarbha_ is identical to the _ālaya-vijñāna_, known prior to awakening as the storehouse-consciousness or 8th consciousness. The ālāya-vijñāna is supposed to contain the pure seed, or tathagatagarbha, from which awakening arises.

The Lankavatara-sutra contains tathagata-garba thought, but also warns against reification of the idea of Buddha-nature, and presents it as an aid to attaining awakening:

Is not this Tathagata-garbha taught by the Blessed One the same as the ego-substance taught by the philosophers? The ego as taught by the philosophers is an eternal creator, unqualified, omnipresent, and imperishable.

The Blessed One replied: it is emptiness, reality-limit, Nirvana, being unborn, unqualified, and devoid of will-effort; the reason why the Tathagatas teach the doctrine pointing to the Tathagata-garba is to make the ignorant cast aside their fear when they listen to the teaching of egolessness and to have them realise the state of non-discrimination and imagelessness

According to Wayman text-decoration: none">Aśvaghoṣa]], no Sanskrit
version of the text is extant. The earliest known versions are written in Chinese, and contemporary scholars believe that the text is a Chinese composition.

The _Awakening of Faith in the Mahayana_ offers a synthesis of Chinese buddhist thinking. It sees the Buddha-nature
doctrine as a cosmological theory, in contrast to the Indo-Tibetan tradition, where the soteriological aspect is emphasized. It described the "One Mind" which "includes in itself all states of being of the phenomenal and transcendental world". It tried to harmonize the ideas of the tathāgatagarbha and ālāya-vijñāna:

In the words of the Awakening of Faith — which summarizes the essentials of Mahayana
— self and world, mind and suchness, are integrally one. Everything is a carrier of that a priori enlightenment; all incipient enlightenment is predicated on it. The mystery of existence is, then, not, "How may we overcome alienation?" The challenge is, rather, "Why do we think we are lost in the first place?"

In the Awakening of Faith the 'one mind' has two aspects, namely tathata, suchness, the things as they are, and samsara, the cycle of birth and death. This text was in line with an essay by Emperor Wu of the Liang dynasty (reign 502-549 CE), in which he postulated a pure essence, the enlightened mind, trapped in darkness, which is ignorance. By this ignorance the pure mind is trapped in samsara. This resembles the tathāgatagarba and the idea of the defilement of the luminous mind. In a commentary on this essay Shen Yue stated that insight into this true essence is awakened by stopping the thoughts - a point of view which is also being found in the _ Platform Sutra _ of Huineng

The joining together of these different ideas supported the notion of the ekayāna , the one vehicle: absolute oneness, all-pervading Buddha-wisdom and original enlightenment as a holistic whole. This synthesis was a reflection of the unity which was attained in China with the united Song dynasty
Song dynasty


In Chan Buddhism
, the Buddha-nature
tends to be seen as the (non-substantial) essential nature of all beings. But the Zen tradition also emphasizes that Buddha-nature
is śūnyatā , the absence of an independent and substantial "self".

Chan masters from Huineng
in 7th-century China to Hakuin Ekaku in 18th-century Japan to Hsu Yun in 20th-century China, have all taught that the process of awakening begins with the light of the mind turning around within the 8th consciousness, so that the _ālayavijñāna_, also known as the _tathāgatagarbha_, is transformed into the "bright mirror wisdom". The _Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra_ presents the Chan/ Zen
Buddhist view of the _tathāgatagarbha_:

Now, Mahāmati, what is perfect knowledge? It is realised when one casts aside the discriminating notions of form, name, reality, and character; it is the inner realisation by noble wisdom. This perfect knowledge, Mahāmati, is the essence of the Tathāgata-garbha.

When this active transformation is complete, the other seven consciousnesses are also transformed. The 7th consciousness of delusive discrimination becomes transformed into the "equality wisdom". The 6th consciousness of thinking sense becomes transformed into the "profound observing wisdom", and the 1st to 5th consciousnesses of the five sensory senses become transformed into the "all-performing wisdom".

According to Heng-Ching Shih, the teaching of the universal Buddha-nature
does not intend to assert the existence of substantial, entity-like self endowed with excellent features of a Buddha. Rather, Buddha-nature
simply represents the potentiality to be realized in the future.

Hsing Yun
Hsing Yun
, forty-eighth patriarch of the Linji school
Linji school
, equates the Buddha-nature
with the dharmakāya in line with pronouncements in key tathāgatagarbha sūtras. He defines these two as:

the inherent nature that exists in all beings. In Mahāyāna Buddhism, enlightenment is a process of uncovering this inherent nature … The Buddha nature identical with transcendental reality. The unity of the Buddha with everything that exists.


In the Korean _Vajrasamādhi Sūtra _ (685 CE), the tathāgatagarbha is presented as being possessed of two elements, one essential, immutable, changeless and still, the other active and salvational:

This "dharma of the one mind", which is the "original tathagatagarbha", is said to be "calm and motionless" ... The _Vajrasamadhi'_s analysis of tathagatagarbha also recalls a distinction the Awakening of Faith makes between the calm, unchanging essence of the mind and its active, adaptable function The tathagatagarbha is equated with the "original edge of reality" (_bhutakoti_) that is beyond all distinctions - the equivalent of original enlightenment, or the essence. But tathagatagarbha is also the active functioning of that original enlightenment - 'the inspirational power of that fundamental faculty' .... The tathagatagarbha is thus both the 'original edge of reality' that is beyond cultivation (= essence) as well as the specific types of wisdom and mystical talents that are the byproducts of enlightenment (= function).



(1222–1282) was a Buddhist monk who taught devotion to the _Lotus Sutra_ as the exclusive means to attain enlightenment, and the chanting of Namu Myōhō Renge Kyō as the essential practice of the teaching. Nichiren
includes various schools with diverging interpretations of Nichiren's teachings.

views the Buddha nature as "The inner potential for attaining Buddhahood", common to all people. Based on the _Lotus Sutra_, Nichiren
maintained that "all living being possess the Buddha nature", being the inherent potential to attain Buddhahood: "The Buddha nature refers to the potential for attaining Buddhahood, a state of awakening filled with compassion and wisdom."

The emphasis in Nichiren
is on "revealing the Buddha nature" - or attaining Buddhahood
– in this lifetime through chanting the name of the Dharma
of the Lotus Sutra: "the Buddha nature within us is summoned forth and manifested by our chanting of Nam-myoho-renge-kyo."

The potential for Buddhahood
exists in the whole spectrum of the Ten Worlds of life, and this means that all people, including evil doers, have Buddha nature, which remains as a dormant possibility or a theoretical potential in the field of emptiness or non-substantiality until it is materialized in reality through Buddhist practice.

In his letter "Opening the Eyes of Wooden and painted Images" Nichiren
explains that insentient matter (such as trees, mandalas, images, statues) also possess the Buddha nature, because they serve as objects of worship. This view regards the Buddha nature as the original nature of all manifestations of life – sentient and insentient – through their interconnectedness:

This concept of the enlightenment of plants in turn derives from the doctrine of three thousand realms in a single moment of life, which teaches that all life—insentient and sentient—possesses the Buddha nature.


The founder of the Sōtō school of Zen
, Dōgen Zenji , held that Buddha-nature
(_busshō_ 佛性) was simply the true nature of reality and Being. This true nature was just impermanence, becoming and 'vast emptiness'. Because he saw the whole universe as an expression of Buddha-nature, he held that even grass and trees are Buddha nature.

Therefore, the very impermanency of grass and tree, thicket and forest is the Buddha nature. The very impermanency of men and things, body and mind, is the Buddha nature. Nature and lands, mountains and rivers, are impermanent because they are the Buddha nature. Supreme and complete enlightenment, because it is impermanent, is the Buddha nature.

The founder of Sanbō Kyōdan lineage of Zen
Buddhism, Yasutani Haku\'un Roshi , also defined Buddha-nature
in terms of the emptiness and impermanence of all dharmas:

Everything by its very nature is subject to the process of infinite transformation - this is its Buddha- or Dharma-nature.

What is the substance of this Buddha- or Dharma-nature? In Buddhism it is called _ku_ (shunyata). Now, _ku_ is not mere emptiness. It is that which is living, dynamic, devoid of mass, unfixed, beyond individuality or personality--the matrix of all phenomena.

A famous reference to Buddha-nature
in the Zen-tradition is the Mu-koan :

A monk asked Zhaozhou Congshen , a Chinese Zen
master (known as _Jōshū_ in Japanese), "Has a dog Buddha-nature
or not?" Zhaozhou answered, "It does not." (_wú_ Chinese, _mu_ in Japanese)_ _


The founder of the Jōdo Shinshū of Pure Land Buddhism
, Shinran , equated Buddha-Nature with shinjin .


Main articles: Rangtong and Shentong

The dominant Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism
favours the rangtong Prasaṅgika Madhyamaka
philosophy over Yogacara
and Buddha-nature thought. Other schools, especially the Jonang , and the Rimé movement have tended to accept the shentong , "other-empty", Madhyamaka
philosophy, which discerns an Absolute which "is empty of adventious defilements which are intrinsically other than it, but is not empty of its own inherent existence". This understanding and interpretation of the tathagatagarbha-teachings has been a matter of intensive debates in Tibet.

According to the Nyingma
and Sakya
schools, tathāgatagarbha is the inseparability of the clarity and emptiness of one's mind. According to the Jonang school, it refers to the innate qualities of the mind which expresses itself in terms of omniscience etc. when adventitious obscurations are removed.


The 14th Dalai Lama
14th Dalai Lama
, an important Gelug figure, speaking from the Madhyamaka
philosophical position, sees the Buddha-nature
as the "original clear light of mind", but points out that it ultimately does not exist independently, because, like all other phenomena, it is of the nature of emptiness:

Once one pronounces the words "emptiness" and "absolute", one has the impression of speaking of the same thing, in fact of the absolute. If emptiness must be explained through the use of just one of these two terms, there will be confusion. I must say this; otherwise you might think that the innate original clear light as absolute truth really exists.

Jeffrey Hopkins conveys the same understanding:

The basis of purification is the Buddha nature, which is viewed in two ways. One is the clear light nature of the mind, a positive phenomenon, and the other is the emptiness of inherent existence of the mind, a negative phenomenon, a mere absence of inherent establishment of the mind.


Speaking for the Nyingma
school, Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche sees an identity between the Buddha-nature, dharmadhātu (essence of all phenomena and the noumenon) and the Three Vajras , saying:

Dharmadhatu is adorned with dharmakaya, which is endowed with dharmadhatu wisdom. This is a brief but very profound statement, because "dharmadhatu" also refers to sugata-garbha or buddha nature. Buddha nature is all-encompassing ... This buddha nature is present just as the shining sun is present in the sky. It is indivisible from the three vajras of the awakened state, which do not perish or change.

The Nyingma
meditation masters, Khenchen Palden Sherab and Khenpo Tsewang Dongyal, emphasise that the essential nature of the mind (the Buddha-nature) is not a blankness, but is characterised by wonderful qualities and a perfection that is already present and complete:

The nature of the mind is not hollow or blank; it is profound and blissful and full of wonderful qualities... meditation practice reveals our true nature as being totally perfect and complete.

They add:

The true nature of mind is beyond conception, yet it is present in every object. The true nature is always there, but due to our temporary obscurations we do not recognize it ... The primordial nature is beyond conceptions; it cannot be explained ... cannot be encompassed by words. Although you can say it is clarity and vastness, you cannot see it or touch it; it is beyond expression.

Speaking in the context of Nyingma, Dzogchen Ponlop expresses the view that there exists within vajrayana Buddhism
the doctrine that we are already buddha: ‘... in the vajrayana, we are buddha _right now_, in this very moment’ and that it is legitimate to have ‘vajra pride’ in our buddha mind and the already present qualities of enlightenment with which it is replete:

Vajra pride refers to our pride and confidence in the absolute nature of our mind as buddha: primordially, originally pure, awake and full of the qualities of enlightenment.


Germano relates Dzogchen, via Buddha-nature
to Madhyamaka, Yogācāra and Abhinavagupta :

...the Great Perfection represents the most sophisticated interpretation of the so-called "Buddha nature" tradition within the context of Indo-Tibetan thought, and as such, is of extreme importance for research into classical esoteric philosophic systems such as Madhyamaka
and Yogacara, while also providing fertile grounds for future explorations of the interconnections between Indo-Tibetan and East Asian forms of Buddhism, as well as between Indo-Tibetan Buddhism and contemporary Indian developments such as the tenth century non-dual Shaivism of Abhinavagupta.

The 19th/20th-century Tibetan Buddhist scholar, Shechen Gyaltsap Gyurme Pema Namgyal, sees the Buddha nature as ultimate truth, nirvana, which is constituted of profundity, primordial peace and radiance:

is immaculate. It is profound, serene, unfabricated suchness, an uncompounded expanse of luminosity; nonarising, unceasing, primordial peace, spontaneously present nirvana.


In the Kagyu tradition, Thrangu Rinpoche
sees the Buddha nature as the indivisible oneness of wisdom and emptiness:

The union of wisdom and emptiness is the essence of Buddha-hood or what is called Buddha-nature
(Skt. _Tathagata-garbha_) because it contains the very seed, the potential of Buddhahood. It resides in each and every being and because of this essential nature, this heart nature, there is the possibility of reaching Buddhahood.


The Jonang school, whose foremost historical figure was the Tibetan scholar-monk Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen , sees the Buddha-nature
as the very ground of the Buddha himself, as the "permanent indwelling of the Buddha in the basal state". Dolpopa comments that certain key _tathāgatagarbha_ sutras indicate this truth.

Moreover, the Buddhist tantric scripture entitled _Chanting the Names of Mañjuśrī (Mañjuśrī-nāma-saṅgīti)_, repeatedly exalts, as portrayed by Dolpopa, not the non-Self but the Self, and applies the following terms to this ultimate reality : 'The Buddha-Self, the beginningless Self, the solid Self, the diamond Self'. These terms are applied in a manner which reflects the cataphatic approach to Buddhism, typical of much of Dolpopa's writings.

Dolpopa further expressed the viewpoint that the Buddha-nature transcends the chain of dependent origination. It is not empty of its own ultimately real essence, but only of extraneous, transitory and relative phenomena.

Dr. Cyrus Stearns writes on Dolpopa's attitude to the 'third turning of the wheel' doctrines (i.e. the Buddha-nature

The Third Turning of the Dharma
Wheel presented the teachings on the Buddha nature, which are the final definitive statements on the nature of ultimate reality, the primordial ground or substratum beyond the chain of dependent origination, and which is only empty of other, relative phenomena.'

In the _Ghanavyuha Sutra_ (as quoted by Longchenpa ) this Buddha essence is said to be the ground of all things:

... the ultimate universal ground also has always been with the Buddha-Essence (Tathagatagarbha), and this essence in terms of the universal ground has been taught by the Tathagata. The fools who do not know it, because of their habits, see even the universal ground as (having) various happiness and suffering and actions and emotional defilements. Its nature is pure and immaculate, its qualities are as wishing-jewels; there are neither changes nor cessations. Whoever realizes it attains Liberation ...


Main article: Rangtong

The Rimé movement
Rimé movement
is an ecumenical movement in Tibet which started as an attempt to reconcile the various Tibetan schools in the 19th century. In contrast to the Gelugpa, which adheres to the _rang stong_, "self-empty", or Prasaṅgika point of view, the Rimé movement supports _shen tong_ (_gzhan tong_), "other-empty", an essential nature which is "pure radiant non-dual consciousness".

Ringu Tulku says,

There has been a great deal of heated debate in Tibet between the exponents of Rangtong, (Wylie: _Rang-stong_) and Shentong, (Wylie: _gZhan-stong_) philosophies. The historic facts of these two philosophies are well known to the Tibetologists.

Jamgon Kongtrul says about the two systems:

Madhyamika philosophies have no differences in realising as 'Shunyata', all phenomena that we experience on a relative level. They have no differences also, in reaching the meditative state where all extremes (ideas) completely dissolve. Their difference lies in the words they use to describe the Dharmata . Shentong describes the Dharmata, the mind of Buddha, as 'ultimately real'; while Rangtong philosophers fear that if it is described that way, people might understand it as the concept of 'soul' or 'Atma'. The Shentong philosopher believes that there is a more serious possibility of misunderstanding in describing the Enlightened State as 'unreal' and 'void'. Kongtrul finds the Rangtong way of presentation the best to dissolve concepts and the Shentong way the best to describe the experience.


Modern scholarship points to the various possible interpretations of Buddha Nature as either an essential self, as Sunyata , or as the _inherent possibility_ of awakening.


Shenpen Hookham, Oxford Buddhist scholar and Tibetan lama of the Shentong tradition writes of the Buddha-nature
or "true self" as something real and permanent, and already present within the being as uncompounded enlightenment. She calls it "the Buddha within", and comments:

In scriptural terms, there can be no real objection to referring to Buddha, Buddhajnana , Nirvana and so forth as the True Self, unless the concept of Buddha and so forth being propounded can be shown to be impermanent, suffering, compounded, or imperfect in some way ... in Shentong terms, the non-self is about what is _not_ the case, and the Self of the Third Dharmachakra
is about what truly IS.

Buddhist scholar and chronicler, Merv Fowler, writes that the Buddha-nature
really is present as an essence within each being. Fowler comments:

The teaching that Buddha-nature
is the hidden essence within all sentient beings is the main message of the _tathagatagarbha_ literature, the earliest of which is the _Tathagatagarbha Sutra_. This short sutra says that all living beings are in essence identical to the Buddha regardless of their defilements or their continuing transmigration from life to life... As in the earlier traditions, there is present the idea that enlightenment, or nirvana, is not something which has to be achieved, it is something which is already there... In a way, it means that everyone is really a Buddha _now_.


According to Heng-Ching Shih, the _tathāgatagarbha_/Buddha-nature does not represent a substantial self (_ātman_). Rather, it is a positive language expression of emptiness (_śūnyatā_), which emphasizes the potentiality to realize Buddhahood
through Buddhist practices. The intention of the teaching of _tathāgatagarbha_/Buddha nature is soteriological rather than theoretical.

Paul Williams puts forward the Madhyamaka
interpretation of the Buddha-nature
as emptiness in the following terms:

… if one is a Madhyamika then that which enables sentient beings to become buddhas must be the very factor that enables the minds of sentient beings to change into the minds of Buddhas. That which enables things to change is their simple absence of inherent existence, their emptiness. Thus the tathagatagarbha becomes emptiness itself, but specifically emptiness when applied to the mental continuum.


Several contemporary Japanese scholars, headed under the label Critical Buddhism
, have been critical of Buddha-nature
thought. According to Matsumoto Shiro and Hakamaya Noriaki, essentialist conceptions of Buddha-nature
are at odds with the fundamental Buddhist doctrine of dependent origination .

Sallie B. King objects to their view, seeing the Buddha-nature
as a metaphor for the potential in all beings to attain Buddhahood, rather than as an ontological reality. Paul Williams too has criticised this view, saying that Critical Buddhism
is too narrow in its definition of what constitutes Buddhism. According to Williams, "We should abandon any simplistic identification of Buddhism
with a straightforward not-Self definition".


Sutton agrees with this critique on the narrowness of interpretation. In discussing the inadequacy of modern scholarship on Buddha-nature, Sutton states,

One is impressed by the fact that these authors, as a rule, tend to opt for a single meaning disregarding all other possible meanings which are embraced in turn by other texts".

He goes on to point out that the term _tathāgatagarbha_ has up to six possible connotations. Of these, he says the three most important are:

* an underlying ontological reality or essential nature (_tathāgata-tathatā-'vyatireka_) which is functionally equivalent to a _self_ (_ātman_) in an _Upanishadic _ sense, * the _dharma-kāya_ which penetrates all beings (_sarva-sattveṣu dharma-kāya-parispharaṇa_), which is functionally equivalent to brahman in an _Upanishadic_ sense * the womb or matrix of Buddhahood
existing in all beings _(tathāgata-gotra-saṃbhava_), which provides beings with the possibility of awakening.

Of these three, Sutton claims that only the third connotation has any soteriological significance, while the other two posit Buddha-nature as an ontological reality and essential nature behind all phenomena.


* Atman (Buddhism) * Dhammakaya Movement * Enlightenment in Buddhism
* Hongaku * Immanence * Kabbalah
* Kulayarāja Tantra * Panentheism * Rigpa * Turiya * Won Buddhism
* World disclosure


* ^ Buddha-dhatu, mind, tathagatagarbha, Dharma-dhatu, suchness (tathata). * ^ Sanskrit; Jp. _Busshō_, "Buddha-nature". * ^ Enlightened one, a/the Buddha * ^ Kevin Trainor: "a sacred nature that is the basis for becoming buddhas." * ^ According to Wayman TEXT-DECORATION: NONE">TATPURUṣA (तत्पुरुष) compound is a dependent determinative compound , i.e. a compound XY meaning a type of Y which is related to X in a way corresponding to one of the grammatical cases of X. * ^ A BAHUVRIHI COMPOUND (from Sanskrit बहुव्रीहि, _bahuvrīhi_, literally meaning "much rice" but denoting a rich man) is a type of compound that denotes a referent by specifying a certain characteristic or quality the referent possesses. * ^ In the _Maraparinirvana Sutra_ the term _tathagatagarbha_ replaces the term _buddhadhatu_, which originally referred to relics. Worship of the physical relics of the Buddha was reshaped into worship of the inner Buddha. * ^ For the various equivalents of the Sanskrit
term "_tathāgatagarbha_" in other languages (Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese), see Glossary of Buddhism
, "tathagatagarbha" * ^ Harvey mentions AN 1.10: "Monks, this mind (_citta _) is brightly shining (_pabhassara_), but it is defiled by defilements which arrive". AN 1.49-52 gives a similar statement

* ^ Each part of the world reflects the totality of the cosmos: quote * ^ According to Kalapahuna, Vasubandhu
does not propagate a "mind only"-theory, but a conception in mind-only"-theory. Kalupahana, _Principles of Buddhist Psychology_ * ^ In the Seminal Heart series of Dzogchen a distinction is made between _kun gzhi_, c.q. _ālaya_, "the base of it all", the samsaric basis of consciousness, of all the samsaric appearances; and _gzhi _, "the nirvanic basis known as the ground." Sam van Schaik: "....the Seminal Heart distinction between two types of basis, the nirvanic basis known as the ground (gzhi) and the samsaric basis of consciousness, the ālaya (kun gzhi). Philip Kapleau , in "The Three Pillars of Zen", drawing from Harada roshi, discerns a "Pure Consciousness" or "Formless Self" underlying the ālāya-vijñāna. This 9th consciousness was also mentioned by Paramārtha, a 6th century Indian translator working in China. * ^ The most notable of which are greed 貪, hatred 嗔, delusion 癡, and pride 慢


* ^ _A_ _B_ Lusthaus 1998 , p. 84. * ^ _A_ _B_ Trainor 2004 , p. 207. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ _G_ _H_ _I_ _J_ _K_ _L_ _M_ _N_ _O_ King 1991 , p. 4. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ _F_ Brown 1994 , p. 44. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Zimmerman 2002 , p. 45. * ^ Brandon, G. S. F., ed. (1972). _A Dictionary of Buddhism_. (NB: with an "Introduction" by T. O. Ling.) New York, NY, USA: Charles Scribner's Sons. SBN 684-12763-6 (trade cloth) p.240 * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Wayman 1990 , p. viii-ix. * ^ Lopez 2001 , p. 263. * ^ _A_ _B_ Wayman 1990 , p. ix. * ^ King 1991 , p. 48. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ Brown 1994 , p. 45. * ^ Zimmerman 2002 , p. 40. * ^ Zimmerman 2002 , p. 41. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Zimmerman 2002 , p. 44. * ^ _A_ _B_ Jikido 2000 , p. 73. * ^ _A_ _B_ King 1991 , p. 5. * ^ _A_ _B_ Shirō 1997 , p. 169. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Williams 2000 , p. 161. * ^ Lusthaus 1998 . * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ Lai . * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ Wayman 1990 , p. 42. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ Gregory 1991 , p. 288-289. * ^ Harvey 1995 , p. 56. * ^ Pabhassara Soetra, Anguttara Nikaya 1.49-52 * ^ Snelling 1987 , p. 125. * ^ _A_ _B_ Reeves 2008 , pp. 15–16 * ^ Reeves 2008 , p. 5 * ^ Dumoulin 2005 , p. 46-47. * ^ Dumoulin 2005 , p. 47. * ^ Snelling 1987 , p. 126. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Harvey 1995 , p. 114. * ^ Wayman 1990 . * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Wayman 1990 , p. 43. * ^ Zimmermann 1999 , p. 143–168. * ^ Padma, Sree. Barber, Anthony W. _ Buddhism
in the Krishna River Valley of Andhra._ 2008. pp. 152 * ^ Wayman 1990 , p. 47-48. * ^ Zimmermann 2002 , p. 39 ff. and 50 ff.. * ^ Wayman 1990 , p. 2. * ^ Brown 1994 , p. 10. * ^ Wayman 1990 , p. 106. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Wayman 1990 , p. 45. * ^ Wayman 1990 , p. 98. * ^ Sasaki 1999 . * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ _E_ King 1991 , p. 14. * ^ Gethin 1998 , p. 52. * ^ _A_ _B_ Williams 2002 , pp. 163-164. * ^ _A_ _B_ Brown 1994 , p. 46. * ^ Wayman 1990 , p. 46. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Kalupahana, David J. (1987). _The Principles of Buddhist Psychology_ (PDF). State University of New York Press. ISBN 9780887064043 . Retrieved 4 May 2015. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Kalupahana, David J. (1992). _A History of Buddhist Philosophy: Continuities and Discontinuities_. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 9780824814021 . Retrieved 4 May 2015. * ^ Gethin, p.222 * ^ Groner, Paul (2000). _The Establishment of the Tendai
School_. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 97–100. ISBN 0824823710 . * ^ Suzuki, D.T., trans. (1932) _The Lankavatara Sutra_. London: Routledge & Kegen Paul: Section LXXXII, p. 191. * ^ Suzuki, D.T. (1956), _The Lankavatara Sutra. A Mahayana
Text._ London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. p.69 * ^ Wayman 1990 , p. 53. * ^ _A_ _B_ Schaik 2004 . * ^ Kapleau 1989 . * ^ _A_ _B_ Yamamoto 1975 . * ^ Liu 1982 , p. 66-67. * ^ Yamamoto 1975 , p. 94–96. * ^ Yamamoto 1975 , p. 87. * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ Lai , p. 11. * ^ Nattier, Jan. The Heart Sūtra: A Chinese Apocryphal Text? _Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies_ Vol. 15 (2), 180-81, 1992. PDF * ^ _Chinese Buddhist Apocrypha_ by Robert E. Buswell. University of Hawaii Press: 1990. ISBN 0-8248-1253-0 . pgs 1-29 * ^ _A_ _B_ _C_ _D_ Lai , p. 11-12. * ^ _A_ _B_ Williams 1994 , p. 109-110. * ^ Lai , p. 12-13. * ^ Price, A.F. and Wong Mou-Lam, trans. (1969). _The Diamond Sutra and the Sutra
of Hui Neng_. Berkeley, CA: Shambhala: Book Two, _The Sutra
of Hui Neng_, Chapter 7, _Temperament and Circumstances_: p. 68. * ^ Ekaku, Hakuin. _The Keiso Dokuzi_. See online version at "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-03-30. Retrieved 2012-03-27. and other websites. * ^ Yu, Lu K'uan (Charles Luk) (1970). _Ch'an and Zen
Teaching First Series_. Berkeley, CA.: Shambala publications: Part I: _Master Hsu Yun's Discourses and Dharma
Words_: pp. 63-64. * ^ Suzuki, D.T., trans. (1932) _The Lankavatara Sutra_. London: Routledge tr. by Tom Graham (1999). _Being Good: Buddhist Ethics for Everyday Life_. New York: Weatherhill: pp. 152-153 * ^ 現代禪宗心性思想研究的幾點評論 * ^ Buswell, Robert E. Jr. (2007). _Cultivating Original Enlightenment_. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press: p. 10. * ^ The English Buddhist Dictionary Committee (2002). _The Soka Gakkai Dictionary of Buddhism_. Tōkyō: Soka Gakkai. ISBN 978-4-412-01205-9 . Archived from the original on May 30, 2014. * ^ All Living Beings Possess Buddha Nature * ^ Freeing the caged bird within Archived July 29, 2013, at the Wayback Machine . * ^ The Gosho Translation Committee: _The Writings of Nichiren Daishonin, Volume I_, Tokyo: Soka Gakkai, 2006. ISBN 4-412-01024-4 ; pp.3 - 5 (On Attaining Buddhahood
in This Lifetime) * ^ When we rever Myoho-renge-kyo inherent * ^ the beings Sokai Gakka International: All the beings * ^ Opening the Eyes of Wooden and painted Images * ^ Enlightenment of plants * ^ Dumoulin, Heinrich. Zen
Buddhism, Volume 2: A History, "Section 2, Dogen" p. 51-119 * ^ Philip Kapleau. _Three Pillars of Zen_. Anchor books, Doubleday. p. 79 * ^ Aitken, Robert, ed. and trans. (1991). _The Gateless Barrier: The Wu-men Kuan (Mumonkan)_. San Francisco: North Point Press. ISBN 0-86547-442-7 . * ^ The Collected Works of Shinran, 1997, Jodo Shinshu Hongwanji-ha * ^ Williams 1994 , p. 107-108. * ^ _A_ _B_ Williams 1994 , p. 107. * ^ Williams 1994 , p. 108. * ^ Williams 1994 , p. 105-109. * ^ Dalai Lama, the (1999). _Buddha Heart, Buddha Mind_. New York: Crossroad: p. 110 * ^ Hopkins 1999 , p. 15. * ^ Urgyen Rinpoche, Tulku (1999). _As It Is_. Hong Kong: Rangjung Yeshe Books: p. 32 * ^ Sherab, Khenchen Palden and Dongyal, Khenpo Tsewang (2006). _Opening to Our Primordial Nature_. New York: Snow Lion: pp. 3, 9 * ^ Sherab, Khenchen Palden and Dongyal, Khenpo Tsewang (2006). _Opening to Our Primordial Nature_. New York: Snow Lion: pp. 22 - 23 * ^ Dzogchen Ponlop, Mind Beyond Death, Snow Lion publications, New York, 2006, p. 76 * ^ Dzogchen Ponlop, _Mind Beyond Death_, Snow Lion Publications, New York, 2006, p. 76 * ^ Germano, David Francis (1992). _Poetic thought, the intelligent Universe, and the mystery of self: The Tantric synthesis of_ rDzogs Chen _in fourteenth century Tibet_, The University of Wisconsin, Madison. Doctoral thesis. pp.viii - ix. * ^ Rabjam, Shechen (2007). _The Great Medicine: Steps in Meditation on the Enlightened Mind_. Boston: Shambhala: p. 21 * ^ Rabjam, Shechen (2007). _The Great Medicine: Steps in Meditation on the Enlightened Mind_. Boston: Shambhala: p. 4 * ^ Thrangu Rinpoche, Khenchen. _Buddha Nature and Buddhahood: the Mahayana
and Tantra
Yana_ Archived December 30, 2007, at the Wayback Machine . * ^ Hopkins, Jeffrey, trans. (2006). _Mountain Doctrine: Tibet's Fundamental Treatise on Other-Emptiness and the Buddha-Matrix._ NY: Snow Lion: p. 196 * ^ cf. Hopkins, Jeffrey, trans. (2006). _Mountain Doctrine: Tibet's Fundamental Treatise on Other-Emptiness and the Buddha-Matrix._ NY: Snow Lion: pp.279-280 * ^ Dr. Cyrus Stearns, _The Buddha from Dolpo: A Study of the Life and Thought of the Tibetan Master Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen_, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1999, p. 87 * ^ Thondup Rinpoche, Tulku (1989). _Buddha Mind_. Ithaca, New York: Snow Lion: p.218 * ^ Which states that all existences are empty of a "self-nature" * ^ Ringu Tulku: The Rimé (Ris-med) movement of Jamgon Kongtrul the Great * ^ Hookham, Shenpen (1991). _The Buddha Within_. State University of New York Press: p. 104, p. 353 * ^ Fowler, Merv (1999). _Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices_. Sussex Academic Press: pp. 100–101 * ^ Williams 2000 , p. 164-165. * ^ Matsumoto Shirõ (1997). _The Doctrine of Tathagata-garbha Is Not Buddhist. In: Jamie Hubbard (ed.), Pruning the Bodhi
Tree: The Storm Over Critical Buddhism, Univ of Hawaii Press 1997_ * ^ Hakamaya Noriaki (1997). _Critical Philosophy Versus Topical Philosophy_, in: Jamie Hubbard (ed.), Pruning the Bodhi
Tree: The Storm Over Critical Buddhism, Univ of Hawaii Press * ^ Sallie B. King (1997), _The Doctrine of Buddha Nature is Impeccably Buddhist_. In: Jamie Hubbard (ed.), Pruning the Bodhi
Tree: The Storm Over Critical Buddhism, Univ of Hawaii Press 1997, pp. 174-179. ISBN 0824819497 * ^ Paul Williams, _ Mahayana
Buddhism_, Routledge, London, 2nd Edition, 2009, p. 128 * ^ Sutton, Florin Giripescu (1991). _Existence and Enlightenment in the Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra_. SUNY (ISBN 0-7914-0172-3 ): p.51 * ^ Takasaki, Jikido (1991). _A Study on the Ratnagotravibhāga_. ISMEO 1966: p.198 * ^ Florin Giripescu Sutton, _Existence and Enlightenment in the Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra_, SUNY(ISBN 0-7914-0172-3 ): p.53 * ^ Wayman, Alex (1981). The Title and Textual Affiliation of the Guhya-garbha Tantra. In: _From Mahayana
to Tantra
— Felicitation Volume for Dr Shunkyo Matsumata_. Tokyo: p.4


* Brown, Brian Edward (1994), _The Buddha Nature. A Study of the Tathagatagarbha and Alayavijnana_, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers * Dumoulin, Heinrich (2005), _ Zen
Buddhism: A History. Volume 1: India and China_, World Wisdom Books, ISBN 978-0-941532-89-1 * Gethin, Rupert (1998), _Foundations of Buddhism_, Oxford University Press * Gregory, Peter N. (1991), _Sudden Enlightenment Followed by Gradual Cultivation: Tsung-mi's Analysis of Mind. In: Peter N. Gregory (editor)(1991), Sudden and Gradual. Approaches to Enlightenment in Chinese Thought._, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited * Hakeda, Yoshito S., trans. (1967), _Awakening of Faith Attributed to Aśvaghoṣa_, New York, NY: Columbia University Press, archived from the original on September 11, 2013 * Harvey, Peter (1995), _An introduction to Buddhism. Teachings, history and practices_, Cambridge University Press * Hookham, Shenpen (tr.) (1998), _The Shrimaladevi Sutra_, Oxford: Longchen Foundation * Hopkins, Jeffrey (1999), _Introduction by Jeffrey Hopkins. In: His Holiness the Dalai Lama: Kalachakra Tantra. Rite of Initiation_, Wisdom Publications * Jikido, Takasaki (2000), "The Tathagatagarbha Theory Reconsidered. Reflections on Some Recent Issues in Japanese Buddhist Studies", _Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 2000 27/1-2_, archived from the original on July 27, 2014 * Kapleau, Philip (1989), _The three pillars of Zen_ * King, Sallie B. (1991), _Buddha Nature_, SUNY Press * Lai, Whalen (2003), _ Buddhism
in China: A Historical Survey. In Antonio S. Cua (ed.): Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy_ (PDF), New York: Routledge, archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2014

* Liu, Ming-Wood (1982), "The Doctrine of the Buddha-Nature in the Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra", _Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 5 (2), pp. 63–94_, archived from the original on October 16, 2013 * Lopez, Donald S. (2001), _The Story of Buddhism: a concise guide to its history & teaching_, HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., ISBN 0-06-069976-0 * Lusthaus, Dan (1998), _Buddhist Philosophy, Chinese. In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Index_, Taylor & Francis * Powers, J. A. (2000). _Concise Encyclopaedia of Buddhism_. * Rawson, Philip (1991). _Sacred Tibet_. London, Thames and Hudson. ISBN 0-500-81032-X . * Reeves, Gene (2008). _The Lotus Sutra: A Contemporary Translation of a Buddhist Classic_. Somerville : Wisdom Publications. ISBN 0-86171-571-3 . * Sasaki, Shizuka (1999), "Review Article: The Mahaparinirvana Sutra and the Origins of Mahayana
Buddhism" (PDF), _Japanese Journal of Religious Studies_, 26 (1-2), archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-08-11, retrieved 21 January 2012 * Schaik, Sam (2004), _Approaching the Great Perfection: Simultaneous and Gradual Methods of Dzogchen Practice in the Longchen Nyingtig_ (PDF), Wisdom Publications Inc. * Shirō, Matsumoto (1997), _Tathagata-Garbha is not Buddhist. In: Jamie Hubbard, Paul Loren Swanson (eds,)(1997), "Pruning the Bodhi Tree: The Storm Over Critical Buddhism"_, University of Hawaii Press * Snelling, John (1987), _The Buddhist handbook. A Complete Guide to Buddhist Teaching and Practice_, London: Century Paperbacks * Suzuki, D.T., (1978). _The Lankavatara Sutra_, Prajna Press, Boulder. * Trainor, Kevin (2004), _Buddhism: The Illustrated Guide_, Oxford University Press * Wayman, Alex and Hideko (1990), _The Lion's roar of Queen Srimala_, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers * Williams, Paul (1994), _ Mahayana
Buddhism. The Doctrinal Foundations_, Routledge * Williams, Paul (2000), _Buddhist Thought_, Routledge * Williams, Paul (2002), _Buddhist Thought_, Taylor & Francis, Kindle Edition * Yamamoto, Kosho (1975), _Mahayanism: A Critical Exposition of the Mahayana
Mahaparinirvana Sutra_, Karinbunko * Zimmermann, Michael (1999), _The Tathagatagarbhasutra: Its Basic Structure and Relation to the Lotus Sutra_ (PDF), Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University for the Academic Year 1998, pp. 143–168, archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2011 * Zimmermann, Michael (2002), _A Buddha Within: The Tathāgatagarbhasūtra. Biblotheca Philologica et Philosophica Buddhica VI_ (PDF), Tokyo: The International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology, Soka University, archived from the original (PDF) on November 11, 2013



* Kalupahana, David J. (1992), _A history of Buddhist philosophy_. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited * Sallie, B. King: Buddha Nature, State University of New York Press 1991, ISBN 0-7914-0428-5


* King, Sallie B. "Buddha nature and the concept of person". _Philosophy East and West_. 39 (2): 151–170. doi :10.2307/1399375 . Archived from the original on July 29, 2014. * Lusthaus, Dan (1998), _Buddhist Philosophy, Chinese. In: Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Index_, Taylor & Francis * Lai, Whalen, _ Buddhism
in China: A Historical Survey_ (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on September 16, 2012


* Brunnholzl, Karl (2009), _Luminous Heart: The Third Karmapa on Consciousness, Wisdom, and Buddha Nature_. Snow Lion Publications. ISBN 978-1-55939-318-8 * Hookham, S.K. (1991), _The Buddha Within: Tathagatagarbha Doctrine According to the Shentong Interpretation of the Ratnagotravibhaga_, SUNY Press


* Harada, Sekkei (2008), _The essence of Zen. The Teachings of Sekkei Harada_, Wisdom Publications

Critical Buddhism

* Hubbard, Jamie; Paul, Paul l. (1997), _Pruning the Bodhi
Tree: The Storm over Critical Buddhism_, University of Hawai'i Press


* Thich Hang Dat, _The Interpretation of Buddha-nature
in Chan Tradition_ * On the Buddha-nature
of Insentient Things, Robert H. Sharf * " Nirvana Sutra": full text of "