Broadcast Music v. Columbia Broadcasting System
   HOME

TheInfoList



Click Here for Items Related To - Broadcast Music v. Columbia Broadcasting System
OR:
Broadcast Music v. Columbia Broadcasting System on:   [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Amazon]

''Broadcast Music Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System Inc.'', 441 U.S. 1 (1979), was an important antitrust case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.


Background

The TV network
CBS CBS Broadcasting Inc., commonly shortened to CBS, the abbreviation of its former legal name Columbia Broadcasting System, is an American commercial broadcast television and radio network serving as the flagship property of the CBS Entertainm ...
(also, at the time, owner of Columbia Records) filed an antitrust suit against licensing agencies alleging that the system by which these agencies received fees for the issuance of blanket licenses to perform copyrighted musical compositions amounted to illegal
price fixing Price fixing is an anticompetitive agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price is maintained at a given ...
. The basic question in the case is "whether the issuance by ASCAP and BMI to CBS of blanket licenses to copyrighted musical compositions at fees negotiated by them is price fixing per se unlawful under the antitrust laws."


Judgment

The Supreme Court held that blanket licenses issued by ASCAP and BMI did not necessarily constitute
price fixing Price fixing is an anticompetitive agreement between participants on the same side in a market to buy or sell a product, service, or commodity only at a fixed price, or maintain the market conditions such that the price is maintained at a given ...
. The judgment, delivered by White J, was unanimous in holding that such practice should instead be examined under the rule of reason to determine if it is unlawful. Stevens J agreed with the majority, but would not have remanded the case to the lower courts for rehearing. He would have held that the blanket license were a breach of s1 of the Sherman Act using the rule of reason.


Significance

The case was part of the court's retreat from applying rigid ''
per se Per se may refer to: * '' per se'', a Latin phrase meaning "by itself" or "in itself". * Illegal ''per se'', the legal usage in criminal and antitrust law * Negligence ''per se'', legal use in tort law * Per Se (restaurant), a New York City restaur ...
'' rules in antitrust to a more permissive rule of reason.


See also

*
US antitrust law In the United States, antitrust law is a collection of mostly federal laws that regulate the conduct and organization of businesses to promote competition and prevent unjustified monopolies. The three main U.S. antitrust statutes are the Sherma ...
* ''
Westmoreland v. CBS ''Westmoreland v. CBS'' was a $120 million libel suit brought in 1982 by former U.S. Army Chief of Staff General William Westmoreland against CBS, Inc. for broadcasting on its program ''CBS Reports'' a documentary entitled ''The Uncounted Enemy ...
'' (S.D.N.Y. 1982) * ''
Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. v. CBS, Inc. ''Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. v. CBS, Inc.'' (194 F.3d 1211 ( 11th Cir. 1999)) is a United States court case that involved a longstanding dispute about the public domain copyright status of the text of Martin Luther King Jr.'s famous s ...
'' (11th Cir. 1999)


External links

*


References

{{Paramount Global 1979 in United States case law United States antitrust case law CBS Television Network United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court Broadcast Music, Inc.