Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
   HOME

TheInfoList



Click Here for Items Related To - Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
OR:
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. on:   [Wikipedia]   [Google]   [Amazon]

''Broadcast Music Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System Inc.'', 441 U.S. 1 (1979), was an important
antitrust Competition law is the field of law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies. Competition law is implemented through public and private enforcement. It is also known as antitrust l ...
case decided by the
Supreme Court of the United States The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point o ...
.


Background

The TV network CBS (also, at the time, owner of
Columbia Records Columbia Records is an American record label owned by Sony Music, Sony Music Entertainment, a subsidiary of Sony Corporation of America, the North American division of Japanese Conglomerate (company), conglomerate Sony. It was founded on Janua ...
) filed an
antitrust Competition law is the field of law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies. Competition law is implemented through public and private enforcement. It is also known as antitrust l ...
suit against licensing agencies alleging that the system by which these agencies received fees for the issuance of blanket licenses to perform copyrighted musical compositions amounted to illegal price fixing. The basic question in the case is "whether the issuance by ASCAP and BMI to CBS of blanket licenses to copyrighted musical compositions at fees negotiated by them is price fixing per se unlawful under the antitrust laws."


Judgment

The Supreme Court held that blanket licenses issued by
ASCAP The American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers (ASCAP) () is an American not-for-profit performance-rights organization (PRO) that collectively licenses the public performance rights of its members' musical works to venues, broadca ...
and BMI did not necessarily constitute price fixing. The judgment, delivered by White J, was unanimous in holding that such practice should instead be examined under the rule of reason to determine if it is unlawful. Stevens J agreed with the majority, but would not have remanded the case to the lower courts for rehearing. He would have held that the blanket license were a breach of s1 of the Sherman Act using the rule of reason.


Significance

The case was part of the court's retreat from applying rigid '' per se'' rules in antitrust to a more permissive
rule of reason The rule of reason is a legal doctrine used to interpret the Sherman Antitrust Act, one of the cornerstones of United States antitrust law. While some actions like price-fixing are considered illegal ''per se', ''other actions, such as poss ...
.


See also

* US antitrust law * '' Westmoreland v. CBS'' (S.D.N.Y. 1982) * '' Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. v. CBS, Inc.'' (11th Cir. 1999)


External links

*


References

{{Paramount Global 1979 in United States case law United States antitrust case law CBS Television Network United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court Broadcast Music, Inc.