ARCHAEOLOGY, or ARCHEOLOGY, is the study of human activity through
the recovery and analysis of material culture . The archaeological
record consists of artifacts , architecture , biofacts or ecofacts,
and cultural landscapes .
Archaeologists study human prehistory and history , from the
development of the first stone tools at
Lomekwi in East
The discipline involves surveying , excavation and eventually analysis of data collected to learn more about the past. In broad scope, archaeology relies on cross-disciplinary research. It draws upon anthropology , history , art history , classics , ethnology , geography , geology , literary history , linguistics , semiology , textual criticism , physics , information sciences , chemistry , statistics , paleoecology , paleography , paleontology , paleozoology , and paleobotany .
* 1.1 Antiquarians * 1.2 First excavations * 1.3 Development of archaeological method
* 2 Purpose
* 2.1 Theory
* 3 Methods
* 3.1 Remote sensing
* 3.2 Field survey
* 3.3 Excavation
* 4 Academic sub-disciplines
* 5 Popular views of archaeology
* 6 Current issues and controversy
* 6.4 Descendant peoples
* 7 See also * 8 References * 9 Bibliography * 10 Further reading * 11 External links
Main article: Antiquarian
The science of archaeology (from Greek ἀρχαιολογία,
_archaiologia_ from ἀρχαῖος, _arkhaios_, "ancient" and
-λογία, _-logia_, "
-logy ") grew out of the older
multi-disciplinary study known as antiquarianism. Antiquarians studied
history with particular attention to ancient artifacts and
manuscripts, as well as historical sites.
Antiquarianism focused on
the empirical evidence that existed for the understanding of the past,
encapsulated in the motto of the 18th-century antiquary, Sir Richard
Colt Hoare , "We speak from facts not theory". Tentative steps towards
the systematization of archaeology as a science took place during the
Enlightenment era in
In Europe, philosophical interest in the remains of Greco -Roman civilization and the rediscovery of classical culture began in the late Middle Age . Flavio Biondo , an Italian Renaissance humanist historian, created a systematic guide to the ruins and topography of ancient Rome in the early 15th century, for which he has been called an early founder of archaeology. Antiquarians, including John Leland and William Camden , conducted surveys of the English countryside, drawing, describing and interpreting the monuments that they encountered.
An early photograph of
One of the first sites to undergo archaeological excavation was
Excavations were also carried out in the ancient towns of
However, prior to the development of modern techniques, excavations tended to be haphazard; the importance of concepts such as stratification and context were overlooked.
DEVELOPMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHOD
The father of archaeological excavation was William Cunnington
(1754–1810). He undertook excavations in
One of the major achievements of 19th century archaeology was the
development of stratigraphy . The idea of overlapping strata tracing
back to successive periods was borrowed from the new geological and
paleontological work of scholars like William Smith ,
James Hutton and
A major figure in the development of archaeology into a rigorous
science was the army officer and ethnologist ,
Augustus Pitt Rivers ,
who began excavations on his land in
William Flinders Petrie is another man who may legitimately be called
the Father of Archaeology. His painstaking recording and study of
artifacts, both in Egypt and later in Palestine , laid down many of
the ideas behind modern archaeological recording; he remarked that "I
believe the true line of research lies in the noting and comparison of
the smallest details." Petrie developed the system of dating layers
based on pottery and ceramic findings , which revolutionized the
chronological basis of
Egyptology . Petrie was the first to
scientifically investigate the Great Pyramid in Egypt during the
1880s. He was also responsible for mentoring and training a whole
generation of Egyptologists, including
The first stratigraphic excavation to reach wide popularity with
public was that of
Hissarlik , on the site of ancient
The next major figure in the development of archaeology was Sir Mortimer Wheeler , whose highly disciplined approach to excavation and systematic coverage in the 1920s and 1930s brought the science on swiftly. Wheeler developed the grid system of excavation , which was further improved by his student Kathleen Kenyon .
_ Cast of the skull of the
The purpose of archaeology is to learn more about past societies and
the development of the human race . Over 99% of the development of
humanity has occurred within prehistoric cultures , who did not make
use of writing , thereby no written records exist for study purposes.
Without such written sources, the only way to understand prehistoric
societies is through archaeology. Because archaeology is the study of
past human activity, it stretches back to about 2.5 million years ago
when we find the first stone tools - The
Oldowan Industry . Many
important developments in human history occurred during prehistory,
such as the evolution of humanity during the
However, it is not only prehistoric, pre-literate cultures that can be studied using archaeology but historic, literate cultures as well, through the sub-discipline of historical archaeology . For many literate cultures, such as Ancient Greece and Mesopotamia , their surviving records are often incomplete and biased to some extent. In many societies, literacy was restricted to the elite classes, such as the clergy or the bureaucracy of court or temple. The literacy even of aristocrats has sometimes been restricted to deeds and contracts. The interests and world-view of elites are often quite different from the lives and interests of the populace. Writings that were produced by people more representative of the general population were unlikely to find their way into libraries and be preserved there for posterity. Thus, written records tend to reflect the biases, assumptions, cultural values and possibly deceptions of a limited range of individuals, usually a small fraction of the larger population. Hence, written records cannot be trusted as a sole source. The material record may be closer to a fair representation of society, though it is subject to its own biases, such as sampling bias and differential preservation .
Often, archaeology provides the only means to learn of the existence
and behaviors of people of the past. Across the millennia many
thousands of cultures and societies and billions of people have come
and gone of which there is little or no written record or existing
records are misrepresentative or incomplete. Writing as it is known
today did not exist in human civilization until the 4th millennium BC,
in a relatively small number of technologically advanced
civilizations. In contrast, _Homo sapiens_ has existed for at least
200,000 years, and other species of _Homo_ for millions of years (see
In addition to their scientific importance, archaeological remains sometimes have political or cultural significance to descendants of the people who produced them, monetary value to collectors, or simply strong aesthetic appeal. Many people identify archaeology with the recovery of such aesthetic, religious, political, or economic treasures rather than with the reconstruction of past societies.
This view is often espoused in works of popular fiction, such as Raiders of the Lost Ark, The Mummy, and King Solomon's Mines. When such unrealistic subjects are treated more seriously, accusations of pseudoscience are invariably levelled at their proponents _(see Pseudoarchaeology )_. However, these endeavours, real and fictional, are not representative of modern archaeology.
There is no one singular approach to archaeological theory that has been adhered to by all archaeologists. When archaeology developed in the late 19th century, the first approach to archaeological theory to be practiced was that of cultural-history archaeology , which held the goal of explaining why cultures changed and adapted rather than just highlighting the fact that they did, therefore emphasizing historical particularism . In the early 20th century, many archaeologists who studied past societies with direct continuing links to existing ones (such as those of Native Americans , Siberians , Mesoamericans etc.) followed the direct historical approach , compared the continuity between the past and contemporary ethnic and cultural groups. In the 1960s, an archaeological movement largely led by American archaeologists like Lewis Binford and Kent Flannery arose that rebelled against the established cultural-history archaeology. They proposed a "New Archaeology", which would be more "scientific" and "anthropological", with hypothesis testing and the scientific method very important parts of what became known as processual archaeology .
In the 1980s, a new postmodern movement arose led by the British archaeologists Michael Shanks , Christopher Tilley , Daniel Miller , and Ian Hodder , which has become known as post-processual archaeology . It questioned processualism's appeals to scientific positivism and impartiality, and emphasized the importance of a more self-critical theoretical reflexivity . However, this approach has been criticized by processualists as lacking scientific rigor, and the validity of both processualism and post-processualism is still under debate. Meanwhile, another theory, known as historical processualism has emerged seeking to incorporate a focus on process and post-processual archaeology's emphasis of reflexivity and history.
Archaeological theory now borrows from a wide range of influences, including neo-evolutionary thought , phenomenology , postmodernism , agency theory , cognitive science , structural functionalism , gender-based and feminist archaeology , and systems theory .
An archaeological investigation usually involves several distinct phases, each of which employs its own variety of methods. Before any practical work can begin, however, a clear objective as to what the archaeologists are looking to achieve must be agreed upon. This done, a site is surveyed to find out as much as possible about it and the surrounding area. Second, an excavation may take place to uncover any archaeological features buried under the ground. And, third, the data collected from the excavation is studied and evaluated in an attempt to achieve the original research objectives of the archaeologists. It is then considered good practice for the information to be published so that it is available to other archaeologists and historians, although this is sometimes neglected.
Before actually starting to dig in a location, remote sensing can be used to look where sites are located within a large area or provide more information about sites or regions. There are two types of remote sensing instruments—passive and active. Passive instruments detect natural energy that is reflected or emitted from the observed scene. Passive instruments sense only radiation emitted by the object being viewed or reflected by the object from a source other than the instrument. Active instruments emit energy and record what is reflected. Satellite imagery is an example of passive remote sensing. Here are two active remote sensing instruments:
LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) A lidar uses a laser (light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) to transmit a light pulse and a receiver with sensitive detectors to measure the backscattered or reflected light. Distance to the object is determined by recording the time between the transmitted and backscattered pulses and using the speed of light to calculate the distance travelled. Lidars can determine atmospheric profiles of aerosols, clouds, and other constituents of the atmosphere.
LASER ALTIMETER A laser altimeter uses a lidar (see above) to measure the height of the instrument platform above the surface. By independently knowing the height of the platform with respect to the mean Earth's surface, the topography of the underlying surface can be determined.
The archaeological project then continues (or alternatively, begins) with a field survey . Regional survey is the attempt to systematically locate previously unknown sites in a region. Site survey is the attempt to systematically locate features of interest, such as houses and middens , within a site. Each of these two goals may be accomplished with largely the same methods.
Survey was not widely practiced in the early days of archaeology.
Survey work has many benefits if performed as a preliminary exercise to, or even in place of, excavation. It requires relatively little time and expense, because it does not require processing large volumes of soil to search out artifacts. (Nevertheless, surveying a large region or site can be expensive, so archaeologists often employ sampling methods.) As with other forms of non-destructive archaeology, survey avoids ethical issues (of particular concern to descendant peoples) associated with destroying a site through excavation. It is the only way to gather some forms of information, such as settlement patterns and settlement structure. Survey data are commonly assembled into maps , which may show surface features and/or artifact distribution. Inverted kite aerial photo of an excavation of a Roman building at Nesley near Tetbury in Gloucestershire.
The simplest survey technique is surface survey. It involves combing an area, usually on foot but sometimes with the use of mechanized transport, to search for features or artifacts visible on the surface. Surface survey cannot detect sites or features that are completely buried under earth, or overgrown with vegetation. Surface survey may also include mini-excavation techniques such as augers , corers , and shovel test pits. If no materials are found, the area surveyed is deemed sterile .
Aerial survey is conducted using cameras attached to airplanes , balloons , UAVs , or even Kites . A bird's-eye view is useful for quick mapping of large or complex sites. Aerial photographs are used to document the status of the archaeological dig. Aerial imaging can also detect many things not visible from the surface. Plants growing above a buried man made structure, such as a stone wall, will develop more slowly, while those above other types of features (such as middens ) may develop more rapidly. Photographs of ripening grain , which changes colour rapidly at maturation, have revealed buried structures with great precision. Aerial photographs taken at different times of day will help show the outlines of structures by changes in shadows. Aerial survey also employs ultraviolet , infrared , ground-penetrating radar wavelengths, LiDAR and thermography .
Geophysical survey can be the most effective way to see beneath the ground. Magnetometers detect minute deviations in the Earth\'s magnetic field caused by iron artifacts, kilns , some types of stone structures , and even ditches and middens. Devices that measure the electrical resistivity of the soil are also widely used. Archaeological features whose electrical resistivity contrasts with that of surrounding soils can be detected and mapped. Some archaeological features (such as those composed of stone or brick) have higher resistivity than typical soils, while others (such as organic deposits or unfired clay) tend to have lower resistivity.
Although some archaeologists consider the use of metal detectors to be tantamount to treasure hunting, others deem them an effective tool in archaeological surveying. Examples of formal archaeological use of metal detectors include musketball distribution analysis on English Civil War battlefields, metal distribution analysis prior to excavation of a 19th-century ship wreck, and service cable location during evaluation. Metal detectorists have also contributed to archaeology where they have made detailed records of their results and refrained from raising artifacts from their archaeological context. In the UK, metal detectorists have been solicited for involvement in the Portable Antiquities Scheme .
Regional survey in underwater archaeology uses geophysical or remote sensing devices such as marine magnetometer, side-scan sonar , or sub-bottom sonar.
Excavation (archaeology) Excavations at the
Edgewater Park Site ,
Archaeological excavation existed even when the field was still the domain of amateurs, and it remains the source of the majority of data recovered in most field projects. It can reveal several types of information usually not accessible to survey, such as stratigraphy , three-dimensional structure, and verifiably primary context.
Modern excavation techniques require that the precise locations of
objects and features, known as their provenance or provenience, be
recorded. This always involves determining their horizontal locations,
and sometimes vertical position as well (also see Primary Laws of
Excavation is the most expensive phase of archaeological research, in relative terms. Also, as a destructive process, it carries ethical concerns. As a result, very few sites are excavated in their entirety. Again the percentage of a site excavated depends greatly on the country and "method statement" issued. Sampling is even more important in excavation than in survey.Sometimes large mechanical equipment, such as backhoes (JCBs ), is used in excavation, especially to remove the topsoil (overburden ), though this method is increasingly used with great caution. Following this rather dramatic step, the exposed area is usually hand-cleaned with trowels or hoes to ensure that all features are apparent.
The next task is to form a site plan and then use it to help decide the method of excavation. Features dug into the natural subsoil are normally excavated in portions to produce a visible archaeological section for recording. A feature, for example a pit or a ditch, consists of two parts: the cut and the fill . The cut describes the edge of the feature, where the feature meets the natural soil. It is the feature's boundary. The fill is what the feature is filled with, and will often appear quite distinct from the natural soil. The cut and fill are given consecutive numbers for recording purposes. Scaled plans and sections of individual features are all drawn on site, black and white and colour photographs of them are taken, and recording sheets are filled in describing the context of each. All this information serves as a permanent record of the now-destroyed archaeology and is used in describing and interpreting the site.
Main article: Post-excavation analysis
Once artifacts and structures have been excavated, or collected from surface surveys, it is necessary to properly study them. This process is known as post-excavation analysis , and is usually the most time-consuming part of an archaeological investigation. It is not uncommon for final excavation reports for major sites to take years to be published.
At a basic level of analysis, artifacts found are cleaned, catalogued and compared to published collections. This comparison process often involves classifying them typologically and identifying other sites with similar artifact assemblages. However, a much more comprehensive range of analytical techniques are available through archaeological science , meaning that artifacts can be dated and their compositions examined. Bones, plants, and pollen collected from a site can all be analyzed using the methods of zooarchaeology , paleoethnobotany , and palynology , while any texts can usually be deciphered .
These techniques frequently provide information that would not otherwise be known, and therefore they contribute greatly to the understanding of a site.
COMPUTATIONAL AND VIRTUAL ARCHAEOLOGY
Main article: Computational archaeology Main article: Virtual archaeology
Computer graphics are now used to build virtual 3D models of sites, such as the throne room of an Assyrian palace or ancient Rome. Photogrammetry is also used as an analytical tool, and digital topographical models have been combined with astronomical calculations to verify whether or not certain structures (such as pillars) were aligned with astronomical events such as the sun's position at a solstice . Agent-based modeling and simulation can be used to better understand past social dynamics and outcomes. Data mining can be applied to large bodies of archaeological 'grey literature'.
Archaeologists around the world use drones to speed up survey work and protect sites from squatters, builders and miners. In Peru, small drones helped researchers produce three-dimensional models of Peruvian sites instead of the usual flat maps – and in days and weeks instead of months and years.
Drones costing as little as £650 have proven useful. In 2013, drones have flown over at least six Peruvian archaeological sites, including the colonial Andean town Machu Llacta 4,000 metres (13,000 ft) above sea level. The drones continue to have altitude problems in the Andes, leading to plans to make a drone blimp , employing open source software.
Jeffrey Quilter, an archaeologist with Harvard University said, "You can go up three metres and photograph a room, 300 metres and photograph a site, or you can go up 3,000 metres and photograph the entire valley."
In September 2014 drones weighing about 5 kg (11 lb) were used for 3D mapping of the above-ground ruins of the Greek city of Aphrodisias . The data is being analysed by the Austrian Archaeological Institute in Vienna.
Main article: Archaeological sub-disciplines
As with most academic disciplines, there are a very large number of archaeological sub-disciplines characterized by a specific method or type of material (e.g., lithic analysis , music , archaeobotany ), geographical or chronological focus (e.g. Near Eastern archaeology , Islamic archaeology, Medieval archaeology ), other thematic concern (e.g. maritime archaeology , landscape archaeology , battlefield archaeology ), or a specific archaeological culture or civilization (e.g. Egyptology , Indology , Sinology ).
Main article: Historical archaeology
Historical archaeology is the study of cultures with some form of writing.
Main article: Ethnoarchaeology
Ethnoarchaeology is the ethnographic study of living people, designed to aid in our interpretation of the archaeological record. The approach first gained prominence during the processual movement of the 1960s, and continues to be a vibrant component of post-processual and other current archaeological approaches. Early ethnoarchaeological research focused on hunter-gatherer or foraging societies; today ethnoarchaeological research encompasses a much wider range of human behaviour.
Main article: Experimental archaeology
Experimental archaeology represents the application of the experimental method to develop more highly controlled observations of processes that create and impact the archaeological record. In the context of the logical positivism of processualism with its goals of improving the scientific rigor of archaeological epistemologies the experimental method gained importance. Experimental techniques remain a crucial component to improving the inferential frameworks for interpreting the archaeological record.
Main article: Archaeological science
Archaeometry aims to systematize archaeological measurement. It emphasizes the application of analytical techniques from physics, chemistry, and engineering. It is a field of research that frequently focuses on the definition of the chemical composition of archaeological remains for source analysis. Archaeometry also investigates different spatial characteristics of features, employing methods such as space syntax techniques and geodesy as well as computer-based tools such as geographic information system technology. Rare earth elements patterns may also be used. A relatively nascent subfield is that of archaeological materials, designed to enhance understanding of prehistoric and non-industrial culture through scientific analysis of the structure and properties of materials associated with human activity.
CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
Main article: Cultural resources management
_ This section POSSIBLY CONTAINS ORIGINAL RESEARCH . Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations . Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (March 2014)_ _(Learn how and when to remove this template message )_
The application of CRM in the United Kingdom is not limited to government-funded projects. Since 1990 PPG 16 has required planners to consider archaeology as a material consideration in determining applications for new development. As a result, numerous archaeological organizations undertake mitigation work in advance of (or during) construction work in archaeologically sensitive areas, at the developer\'s expense .
In England, ultimate responsibility of care for the historic
environment rests with the
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
in association with
English Heritage . In
Among the goals of CRM are the identification, preservation, and maintenance of cultural sites on public and private lands, and the removal of culturally valuable materials from areas where they would otherwise be destroyed by human activity, such as proposed construction. This study involves at least a cursory examination to determine whether or not any significant archaeological sites are present in the area affected by the proposed construction. If these do exist, time and money must be allotted for their excavation. If initial survey and/or test excavations indicate the presence of an extraordinarily valuable site, the construction may be prohibited entirely.
Cultural resources management has, however, been criticized. CRM is
conducted by private companies that bid for projects by submitting
proposals outlining the work to be done and an expected budget. It is
not unheard-of for the agency responsible for the construction to
simply choose the proposal that asks for the least funding. CRM
archaeologists face considerable time pressure, often being forced to
complete their work in a fraction of the time that might be allotted
for a purely scholarly endeavour. Compounding the time pressure is the
vetting process of site reports that are required (in the US) to be
submitted by CRM firms to the appropriate State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO). From the SHPO's perspective there is to be no
difference between a report submitted by a CRM firm operating under a
deadline, and a multi-year academic project. The end result is that
The annual ratio of open academic archaeology positions (inclusive of
post-doc , temporary, and non- tenure track appointments) to the
annual number of archaeology MA/MSc and PhD students is
POPULAR VIEWS OF ARCHAEOLOGY
Extensive excavations at Beit She\'an ,
Early archaeology was largely an attempt to uncover spectacular artifacts and features, or to explore vast and mysterious abandoned cities. Early archaeology was mostly done by upper class, scholarly men. This generalization laid the foundation for the modern popular view of archaeology and archaeologists. This generalization has been with western culture for a long time. Another popular thought that dates back to this era is that archaeology is monetarily lucrative. A large majority of the general public is under the impression that excavations are undertaken for money and not historical data. It is easy for the general public to hold this notion for that is what is presented to them through general media, and has been for many decades.
The majority of the public view archaeology as being something only available to a narrow demographic. The job of archaeologist is depicted as a "romantic adventurist occupation". To generalize, the public views archaeology as a fantasized hobby more than a job in the scientific community. The audience may not take away scientific methods from popular cinema but they do form a notion of "who archaeologists are, why they do what they do, and how relationships to the past are constituted". The modern depiction of archaeology is sensationalized so much that it has incorrectly formed the public's perception of what archaeology is. The public is often under the impression that all archaeology takes place in a distant and foreign land, only to collect monetarily or spiritually priceless artifacts.
Much thorough and productive research has indeed been conducted in dramatic locales such as Copán and the Valley of the Kings , but the bulk of activities and finds of modern archaeology are not so sensational. Archaeological adventure stories tend to ignore the painstaking work involved in carrying out modern surveys, excavations , and data processing . Some archaeologists refer to such off-the-mark portrayals as "pseudoarchaeology ". Archaeologists are also very much reliant on public support; the question of exactly who they are doing their work for is often discussed.
CURRENT ISSUES AND CONTROVERSY
Excavations at the site of Gran Dolina , in the Atapuerca Mountains , Spain, 2008
Motivated by a desire to halt looting, curb pseudoarchaeology , and to help preserve archaeological sites through education and fostering public appreciation for the importance of archaeological heritage, archaeologists are mounting public-outreach campaigns. They seek to stop looting by combatting people who illegally take artifacts from protected sites, and by alerting people who live near archaeological sites of the threat of looting. Common methods of public outreach include press releases, and the encouragement of school field trips to sites under excavation by professional archaeologists. Public appreciation of the significance of archaeology and archaeological sites often leads to improved protection from encroaching development or other threats.
One audience for archaeologists' work is the public. They increasingly realize that their work can benefit non-academic and non-archaeological audiences, and that they have a responsibility to educate and inform the public about archaeology. Local heritage awareness is aimed at increasing civic and individual pride through projects such as community excavation projects, and better public presentations of archaeological sites and knowledge. The U.S.Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service (USFS) operates a volunteer archaeology and historic preservation program called the Passport in Time (PIT). Volunteers work with professional USFS archaeologists and historians on national forests throughout the U.S. Volunteers are involved in all aspects of professional archaeology under expert supervision.
Television programs, web videos and social media can also bring an
understanding of underwater archaeology to a broad audience. The
_Mardi Gras_ Shipwreck Project integrated a one-hour HD documentary,
short videos for public viewing and video updates during the
expedition as part of the educational outreach. Webcasting is also
another tool for educational outreach. For one week in 2000 and 2001,
live underwater video of the _Queen Anne\'s Revenge _ Shipwreck
Project was webcast to the
In the UK, popular archaeology programs such as _ Time Team _ and _ Meet the Ancestors _ have resulted in a huge upsurge in public interest. Where possible, archaeologists now make more provisions for public involvement and outreach in larger projects than they once did, and many local archaeological organizations operate within the Community archaeology framework to expand public involvement in smaller-scale, more local projects. Archaeological excavation, however, is best undertaken by well-trained staff that can work quickly and accurately. Often this requires observing the necessary health and safety and indemnity insurance issues involved in working on a modern building site with tight deadlines. Certain charities and local government bodies sometimes offer places on research projects either as part of academic work or as a defined community project. There is also a flourishing industry selling places on commercial training excavations and archaeological holiday tours.
Archaeologists prize local knowledge and often liaise with local historical and archaeological societies, which is one reason why Community archaeology projects are starting to become more common. Often archaeologists are assisted by the public in the locating of archaeological sites, which professional archaeologists have neither the funding, nor the time to do.
The Archaeological Legacy Institute (ALI), self-described as "an
independent, nonprofit, tax-exempt (501)", is a research and education
corporation registered in Oregon in 1999. The ALI founded an online
Main article: Pseudoarchaeology
Pseudoarchaeology is an umbrella term for all activities that falsely claim to be archaeological but in fact violate commonly accepted and scientific archaeological practices. It includes much fictional archaeological work (discussed above), as well as some actual activity. Many non-fiction authors have ignored the scientific methods of processual archaeology, or the specific critiques of it contained in post-processualism .
An example of this type is the writing of Erich von Däniken . His 1968 book, _ Chariots of the Gods? _, together with many subsequent lesser-known works, expounds a theory of ancient contacts between human civilization on Earth and more technologically advanced extraterrestrial civilizations. This theory, known as palaeocontact theory , or Ancient astronaut theory , is not exclusively Däniken's, nor did the idea originate with him. Works of this nature are usually marked by the renunciation of well-established theories on the basis of limited evidence, and the interpretation of evidence with a preconceived theory in mind.
A looter's pit on the morning following its excavation, taken at
Rontoy , Huaura Valley ,
In 1937 W. F. Hodge the Director of the
Southwest Museum released a
statement that the museum would no longer purchase or accept
collections from looted contexts. The first conviction of the
transport of artifacts illegally removed from private property under
the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA; Public
Archaeologists trying to protect artifacts may be placed in danger by looters or locals trying to protect the artifacts from archaeologists who are viewed as looters by the locals.
In the United States, examples such as the case of
As a consequence of this, American Indians attempted to prevent
archaeological excavation of sites inhabited by their ancestors, while
American archaeologists believed that the advancement of scientific
knowledge was a valid reason to continue their studies. This
contradictory situation was addressed by the Native American Graves
Archaeologists have also been obliged to re-examine what constitutes an archaeological site in view of what native peoples believe to constitute sacred space. To many native peoples, natural features such as lakes, mountains or even individual trees have cultural significance. Australian archaeologists especially have explored this issue and attempted to survey these sites to give them some protection from being developed. Such work requires close links and trust between archaeologists and the people they are trying to help and at the same time study.
While this cooperation presents a new set of challenges and hurdles to fieldwork, it has benefits for all parties involved. Tribal elders cooperating with archaeologists can prevent the excavation of areas of sites that they consider sacred, while the archaeologists gain the elders' aid in interpreting their finds. There have also been active efforts to recruit aboriginal peoples directly into the archaeological profession.
A new trend in the heated controversy between
First Nations groups
and scientists is the repatriation of native artifacts to the original
descendants. An example of this occurred June 21, 2005, when community
members and elders from a number of the 10 Algonquian nations in the
The remains and artifacts, including jewelry , tools and weapons ,
were originally excavated from various sites in the
An inconspicuous rock mound marks the reburial site where close to 80 boxes of various sizes are buried. Because of this reburial, no further scientific study is possible. Although negotiations were at times tense between the Kitigan Zibi community and museum, they were able to reach agreement.
GIS in archaeology
* Intellectual Property Issues in
* ^ _
* Aldenderfer, M. S.; Maschner, H. D. G., eds. (1996),
_Anthropology, Space, and Geographic Information Systems_, New York:
Oxford University Press
* Ascher, R. (1961), "Analogy in archaeological interpretation",
_Southwestern Journal of Anthropology_, 17 (4), pp. 317–325, JSTOR
* Ascher, R. (1961), "Experimental Archeology", _American
Anthropologist_, 63 (4), pp. 793–816, doi
* Billman, B. R.; Feinman, G. (1999), _Settlement Pattern Studies in
the Americas—Fifty Years Since Virú_, Washington DC: Smithsonian
* Binford, L. (1962), "
* Denning, K. (2004), "The Storm of Progress' and
* Gould, R.; Yellen, J. (1987), "Man the Hunted: Determinants of
Household Spacing in Desert and Tropical Foraging Societies", _Journal
of Anthropological Archaeology_, 6, p. 77, doi
* Haviland, William A.; Prins, Harald E. L.; McBride, Bunny;
Walrath, Dana (2010), _
* Shott, M. J.; Sillitoe, P. (2005), "Use life and curation in New
Guinea experimental used flakes", _Journal of Archaeological Science_,
32 (5), pp. 653–663, doi :10.1016/j.jas.2004.11.012
* Tassie, G. J.; Owens, L.S. (2010), _Standards of Archaeological
Excavations: A Fieldguide to the Methology, Recording Techniques and
Conventions_, London: GHP, ISBN 978-1-906137-17-5
* Taylor, W. W. (1948), _A Study of Archaeology_, Menasha: American
Anthropological Association, ISBN 0-906367-12-3 ,
* Tilley, Christopher, ed. (1993), _Interpretive Archaeology_,
Oxford: Berg, ISBN 0-85496-842-3 ,
* Trigger, B. G. (1989), _A
Main articles: Bibliography of anthropology and Table of years in archaeology
* _Archaeology_ (magazine)
Lewis Binford - _New Perspectives in Archaeology_ (1968) ISBN
Glyn Daniel - _A Short
* v * t * e
Johann Joachim Winckelmann
* Richard Hoare
* Survey * Excavation * Post-excavation
* African * American * Asian * Australian * Biblical * Classical * Egyptian * Near Eastern * Mediaeval * Post-Mediaeval
* v * t * e
Collection care and management
* Art handler * Collection manager * Conservator-restorer * Conservation scientist * Conservation technician * Curator * Exhibition designer * Mount maker * Objects conservator * Paintings conservator * Photograph conservator * Preservationist * Registrar (museum) * Textile conservator
* Antiques restoration * Archaeological science * Archaeology * Bioarchaeology * Building restoration * Conservation science * Digital photograph restoration * Digital preservation * Database preservation * Film preservation * Frame conservation * Heritage science * Historic preservation * Media preservation * Object conservation * Optical media preservation * Painting conservation * Preservation (library and archival science) * Restoration * Sustainable preservation * Web archiving
* Archaeological sites
* Conservation-restoration of the Shroud of Turin * Conservation-restoration of the Sistine Chapel frescoes * Conservation-restoration of the Statue of Liberty * Conservation-restoration of the C.S.S. _H.L. Hunley_ * Modern and Contemporary Art Research Initiative
* v * t * e
* archaeology * cultural * linguistics * social
* microeconomics * macroeconomics
* human * integrative
* cultural * economic * political * social
* jurisprudence * legal history * legal systems
* international relations * psephology * public administration * public policy
* abnormal * biological * cognitive * developmental * personality * social
* criminology * demography * internet * rural * urban
* economics * history * psychology * social science
* land use * regional * urban
* Index * Journals * Outline * Wikiversity
* v * t * e
* Bioinformatics * Biological engineering * Biomechatronics * Biomedical engineering * Biotechnology * Cheminformatics * Genetic engineering * Healthcare science * Medical research * Medical technology * Nanomedicine * Neuroscience * Neurotechnology * Pharmacology * Reproductive technology * Tissue engineering
Buildings and construction
Building services engineering
Clean coal technology
Environmental engineering science
IT and communications
* Audio * Biochemical * Ceramic * Chemical * Polymer * Control * Electrical * Electronic * Entertainment * Geotechnical * Hydraulic * Mechanical * Mechatronics * Optical * Protein * Quantum
Theories and concepts
* Pre-STEM * women
* Technical universities and colleges