Algiz

Algiz (also Elhaz) is the name conventionally given to the "''z''-rune" of the Elder Futhark runic alphabet. Its transliteration is ''z'', understood as a phoneme of the Proto-Germanic language, the terminal ''*z'' continuing Proto-Indo-European terminal ''*s''.

It is one of two runes which express a phoneme that does not occur word-initially, and thus could not be named acrophonically, the other being the ''ŋ''-rune Ingwaz . As the terminal ''*-z'' phoneme marks the nominative singular suffix of masculine nouns, the rune occurs comparatively frequently in early epigraphy.

Because this specific phoneme was lost at an early time, the Elder Futhark rune underwent changes in the medieval runic alphabets. In the Anglo-Saxon futhorc it retained its shape, but it was given the sound value of Latin ''x''. This is a secondary development, possibly due to runic manuscript tradition, and there is no known instance of the rune being used in an Old English inscription.

In Proto-Norse and Old Norse, the Germanic ''*z'' phoneme developed into an R sound, perhaps realized as a retroflex approximant , which is usually transcribed as ''ʀ''. This sound was written in the Younger Futhark using the Yr rune , the Algiz rune turned upside down, from about the 7th century. This phoneme eventually became indistinguishable from the regular ''r'' sound in the later stages of Old Norse, at about the 11th or 12th century.

The shape of the rune may be derived from that a letter expressing /x/ in certain Old Italic alphabets (), which was in turn derived from the Greek letter Ψ which had the value of /kʰ/ (rather than /ps/) in the Western Greek alphabet.

Name

The Elder Futhark rune is conventionally called ''Algiz'' or ''Elhaz'', from the Common Germanic word for " elk".

There is wide agreement that this is most likely not the historical name of the rune, but in the absence of any positive evidence of what the historical name may have been, the conventional name is simply based on a reading of the rune name in the Anglo-Saxon rune poem, first suggested by Wilhelm Grimm (''Über deutsche Runen'', 1821), as ''eolh'' or ''eolug'' "elk".

Like the ''ng''-rune, the ''z''-rune is a special case inasmuch as it could not have been named acrophonically, since the sound it represents did not occur in word-initial position. Choosing a name that terminates in ''-z'' would have been more or less arbitrary, as this was the nominative singular suffix of almost every masculine noun of the language. Since the name ''eolh'', or more accurately ''eolh-secg'' "elk-sedge" in the Anglo-Saxon rune poem represents not the rune's original sound value, but rather the sound of Latin ''x'' (/ks/), it becomes highly arbitrary to suggest that the original rune should have been named after the elk.

There are a number of speculative suggestions surrounding the history of the rune's name. The difficulty lies in the circumstance that the Younger Futhark rune did not inherit this name at all, but acquired the name of the obsolete Eihwaz rune, as ''yr''. The only independent evidence of the Elder Futhark rune's name would be the name of the corresponding Gothic letter, ''ezec''. The Gothic letter was an adoption of Greek Zeta, and while it did express the /z/ phoneme, this Gothic sound only rarely occurred terminally. Instead, it is found mostly in positions where West and North Germanic have ''r'', e.g. Gothic ''máiza'' "greater" (Old Norse ''meira'', English ''more'').

The name of the Anglo-Saxon rune is variously recorded as ''eolx, eolhx, ilcs, ilx, iolx, ilix, elux''.Alan Griffiths, 'Rune-names: the Irish connexion' in: Stoklund et al. (eds.), ''Runes and their secrets: studies in runology'', Museum Tusculanum Press, 2006, pp. 93-101.

Manuscript tradition gives its sound value as Latin ''x'', i.e. /ks/, or alternatively as ''il'', or yet again as "''l'' and ''x''". The reading of this opaque name as ''eolh'' "elk" is entirely due to the reading of the Anglo-Saxon rune poem's secg as ''eolh-secg'' (''eolx-secg'', ''eolug-secg'', ''eolxecg'') "elk-sedge", apparently the name of a species of sedge (''Carex''). This reading of the poem is due to Wilhelm Grimm (1821), and remains standard. The suggestion is that this compound is realized as ''eolk-secg'', thus containing the Latin ''x'' (/ks/) sound sequence. The manuscript testimony that the rune is to be read as ''il'' would then be simply a mistaken assumption that its name must be acrophonic.

The name of the corresponding Gothic letter ''ezec'', however, suggests that the old name of this rune was not just ''eolx'', but the full ''eolh-secg''. This is puzzling, because the sound value of the rune was clearly not /ks/ in the Elder Futhark period (2nd to 4th centuries). Furthermore, the name of the sedge in question is recorded in the older Epinal-Erfurt glossary as ''ilugsegg'' (glossing ''papiluus'', probably for ''papyrus''), which cannot be derived from the word for elk.

A suggestion by Warren and Elliott takes the Old English ''eolh'' at face value, and reconstructs a Common Germanic form of either ''*algiz'' or ''*alhiz''. They cite a "more fanciful school" which assumes an original meaning of "elk" based on a theonym '' Alcis'' recorded by Tacitus (suggesting that the name would have been theophoric in origin, referring to an "elk-god"). The authors dismiss the Old English "elk-sedge" as a late attempt to give the then-obsolete rune a value of Latin ''x''. Instead, they suggest that the original name of the rune could have been Common Germanic ''*algiz'' ('Algie'), meaning not "elk" but "protection, defence".

Redbond (1936) suggested that the ''eolhx'' (etc.) may have been a corruption of ''helix''. Seebold (1991) took this up to suggest that the name of the rune may be connected to the use of ''elux'' for ''helix'' by Notker to describe the constellation of Ursa major (as turning around the celestial pole).

An earlier suggestion is that of Zacher (1855), to the effect that the earliest value of this rune was the labiovelar /hw/, and that its name may have been ''hweol'' "wheel".

Elder Futhark

In the Elder Futhark, Algiz represents the Germanic phoneme ''*z'', which does not occur word-initially.

It is attested in final position in the earliest inscriptions, e.g. in ''ansuz'' ( Vimose buckle), ''þewaz'' ( Thorsberg chape). It was presumably present in the Ovre Stabu spearhead inscription (ca. AD 180), reading ''raunija ', but is hardly legible now. The Nydam axe-handle (4th century) has the name ''wagagastiz''. The Golden Horns of Gallehus (early 5th century) had the personal name ''hlewagastiz holtijaz''.

In the earliest inscriptions, the rune invariably has its standard Ψ-shape. From the 5th century or so, the rune appears optionally in its upside-down variant which would become the standard Younger Futhark ''yr'' shape. There are also other graphical variants; for example, the Charnay Fibula has a superposition of these two variants, resulting in an "asterisk" shape ().

Anglo-Saxon futhorc

The name of the Anglo-Saxon rune is variously recorded as ''eolx, ilcs, ilix, elux, eolhx''. Manuscript tradition gives its sound value as Latin ''x'', i.e. /ks/, or alternatively as ''il'', or yet again as "''l'' and ''x''". The relevant stanza of the Anglo-Saxon rune poem reads:
: ''sec'' e'ard hæfþ oftust on fenne''
:''ƿexeð on ƿature, ƿundaþ grimme''
:''blode breneð beorna gehƿylcne''
:''ðe him ænigne onfeng gedeþ.''
Reading the rune as ''eolhx'' (as discussed above), and with the emendation of ''seccard'' to ''secg eard'' due to Grimm (1821), the stanza becomes about a species of sedge (''Cladium mariscus'') called "elk-sedge". In the translation of Page (1999):Page (1999:71).
:The Elk-sedge usually lives in the fen,
:growing in the water. It wounds severely,
:staining with blood any man
:who makes a grab at it.

The 9th-century ''abecedarium anguliscum'' in Codex Sangallensis 878 shows ''eolh'' as a peculiar shape, as it were a bindrune of the older with the Younger Futhark , resulting in an "asterisk" shape similar to ''ior'' .

The only known instance where the rune does take the sound value of Latin ''x'' in epigraphy is the spelling of ''rex'' "king" on the interlace coin dies of king Beonna (mid 8th century). Furthermore, it appears in the inscription on St Cuthbert's coffin (late 7th century) in the abbreviation of the name Christ, where Greek ΧΡϹ is taken as Latin ''xps'' and rendered as runic .

Younger Futhark

In the 6th and 7th centuries, the Elder Futhark began to be replaced by the Younger Futhark in Scandinavia. By the 8th century, the Elder Futhark was extinct, and Scandinavian runic inscriptions were exclusively written in Younger Futhark.

The Yr rune is a rune of the Younger Futhark. Its common transliteration is a small capital ''ʀ''. The shape of the ''Yr'' rune in the Younger Futhark is the inverted shape of the Elder Futhark rune (). Its name ''yr'' ("yew") is taken from the name of the Elder Futhark Eihwaz rune.

Its phonological value is the continuation of the phoneme represented by Algiz, the word-final ''*-z'' in Proto Germanic. In Proto-Norse it is pronounced closer to , perhaps . Within later Old Norse, the Proto-Norse phoneme collapses with by the 12th century.

Unicode has "Latin Small Capital Letter R" at code point U+0280 ʀ (IPA’s symbol for the uvular trill). A corresponding capital letter is at U+01A6 Ʀ, called "Latin Letter Yr". The rune itself is encoded at U+16E6 "Long Branch Yr". Variants are "Short Twig Yr" at U+16E7 and "Icelandic Yr" at U+16E8 .

The Anglo-Saxon ''calc'' rune ᛣ has the same shape as Younger Futhark ''yr'', but is unrelated in origin (being a modification or "doubling" of ''cen'' ᚳ).

Independently, the shape of the Elder Futhark Algiz rune reappears in the Younger Futhark '' Maðr'' rune , continuing the Elder Futhark rune '' *Mannaz''.

Modern usage

"Life rune" and "Death rune"

The ''Man'' and ''Yr'' runes in Guido von List's Armanen Futharkh were based on the Younger Futhark. List's runes were later adopted and modified by Karl Maria Wiligut who was responsible for their adoptions in Nazi occultism. Both List and Wiligut have an "Yr" rune of the same shape as the Younger Futhark ''Yr'' rune.

In this context, the ''Man'' rune (identical in shape to the Elder Futhark ''Algiz'') came to be understood in the Germanic mysticism of the early 20th century as symbolizing "life" and called the "life rune" (german: Lebensrune). This term occurs as early as the 1920s in the literature of Germanic mysticism, and it came to be widely used within the Nazi Party and Nazi Germany, e.g. in official prescriptions for the various uniforms of the '.

The ''Yr'' rune came to be seen as the "life rune" inverted and interpreted as "death rune" (') During the World War II era, these two runes ( for "born", for "died") came to be used in obituaries and on tomb stones as marking birth and death dates, replacing asterisk and cross symbols (* for "born", † for "died") conventionally used in this context in Germany. It has always been clear that this association is an innovation of modern esotericism, without direct precedent in the medieval usage of the Younger Futhark alphabet. This fact was pointed out in an article in the German journal '' Stimmen der Zeit'' as early as in 1940.

After 1945, the term "life rune" continued to be used as '' völkisch'' nationalism. Contemporary examples include use by the American National Alliance (as of 2007),From the official National Alliance website: "The Life Rune signifies life, creation, birth, rebirth, and renewal. It expresses in a single symbol the ''raison d’etre'' of the National Alliance and of the movement of Aryan renewal.
"The Life Rune: an ancient symbol used by the National Alliance"
(natall.com). and in reference to the Algiz rune in the logo of the Flemish nationalist as ''levensrune'' (as of 2016).

The term "death rune" has been used in the context of esotericist or occultist aesthetics associated with black metal, in the name of ''Deathrune Records'' (as of 2011), formerly '' Records'', a minor black metal record label.

Pop culture

Following Ralph Blum (1982), the Algiz rune is given a sense of "protection" in some modern systems of runic divination.
Blum (1982) himself glosses for ''Algiz'' with "Protection; Sedge or Rushes; An Elk".Blum (1982), pp. 86f.
"The protection of the Warrior is like the curved horns of the elk, or like the sedge grass, for both serve to keep open space around you."
Blum's gloss "protection" is apparently inspired by the "more fanciful school" deriving the rune's name from ''Alcis'' cited by Warren and Elliot (1980, discussed above)

See also

*Elder Futhark
*Younger Futhark

Notes

References

* Dobbie, Elliott Van Kirk (1942). ''The Anglo-Saxon Minor Poems''. Columbia University Press. .
* Page, R. I. (1999)
''An Introduction to English Runes''
Boydell Press, page 71. .

{{Runes

Runes