, a copula (plural: copulas or copulae; abbreviated
) is a word or phrase that links the subject
of a sentence
to a subject complement
, such as the word ''is'' in the sentence "The sky is blue" or the phrase ''was not being'' in the sentence "It was not being used." The word ''copula'' derives from the Latin
noun for a "link" or "tie" that connects two different things.
A copula is often a verb
or a verb-like word, though this is not universally the case.
A verb that is a copula is sometimes called a copulative or copular verb. In English primary education grammar
courses, a copula is often called a linking verb
. In other languages, copulas show more resemblances to pronoun
s, as in Classical Chinese
, or may take the form of suffix
es attached to a noun, as in Korean
, and Inuit languages
Most languages have one main copula, although some (like Spanish
) have more than one, and some have none
. In the case of English, this is the verb ''to be''. While the term ''copula'' is generally used to refer to such principal forms, it may also be used to refer to some other verbs with similar functions, like ''become'', ''get'', ''feel'' and ''seem'' in English; these may also be called "semi-copulas" or "pseudo-copulas".
The principal use of a copula is to link the subject
of a clause
to a subject complement
. A copular verb is often considered to be part of the predicate
, the remainder being called a predicative expression
. A simple clause containing a copula is illustrated below:
::The book is on the table.
In that sentence, the noun phrase
''the book'' is the subject, the verb ''is'' serves as the copula, and the prepositional phrase
''on the table'' is the predicative expression. The whole expression ''is on the table'' may (in some theories of grammar) be called a predicate or a verb phrase
The predicative expression accompanying the copula, also known as the complement
of the copula, may take any of several possible forms: it may be a noun or noun phrase, an adjective
or adjective phrase, a prepositional phrase (as above) or another adverb or adverbial phrase expressing time or location. Examples are given below (with the copula in bold and the predicative expression in italics):
::Mary and John are ''my friends''.
::The sky was ''blue''.
::I am ''taller than most people''.
::The birds and the beasts were ''there''.
The three components (subject, copula and predicative expression) do not necessarily appear in that order: their positioning depends on the rules for word order
applicable to the language in question. In English (an SVO
language) the ordering given is the normal one, but here too, certain variation is possible:
*In many questions and other clauses with subject–auxiliary inversion
, the copula moves in front of the subject: ''Are you happy?''
*In inverse copular constructions
(see below) the predicative expression precedes the copula, but the subject follows it: ''In the room were three men.''
It is also possible, in certain circumstances, for one (or even two) of the three components to be absent:
(pro-drop) languages, the subject may be omitted, as it may from other types of sentence. In Italian, ''sono stanco'' means "I am tired", literally "am tired".
*In non-finite clause
s in languages like English, the subject is often absent, as in the participial phrase
''being tired'' or the infinitive phrase
''to be tired''. The same applies to most imperative sentences like ''Be good!''
*For cases in which no copula appears, see below.
*Any of the three components may be omitted as a result of various general types of ellipsis
. In particular, in English, the predicative expression may be elided in a construction similar to verb phrase ellipsis
, as in short sentences like ''I am''; ''Are they?'' (where the predicative expression is understood from the previous context).
Inverse copular constructions
, in which the positions of the predicative expression and the subject are reversed, are found in various languages. They have been the subject of much theoretical analysis, particularly in regard to the difficulty of maintaining, in the case of such sentences, the usual division into a subject noun phrase
and a predicate verb phrase
Another issue is verb agreement
when both subject and predicative expression are noun phrases (and differ in number or person): in English, the copula typically agrees with the syntactical subject even if it is not logically (i.e. semantically
) the subject, as in ''the cause of the riot is'' (not ''are'') ''these pictures of the wall''. Compare Italian ''la causa della rivolta sono'' ("are", not ''è'' "is") ''queste foto del muro''. In instances where a syntactical subject comprises a prepositional object that is a pluralized, however, the prepositional object agrees with the predicative expression, e.g. "What kind ''of birds are'' those?"
The precise definition and scope of the concept of a copula is not necessarily precise in any language. For example, in English though the concept of the copula is most strongly associated with the verb ''be'', there are many other verbs that can be used in a copular sense as well. For example,
* The boy became a man.
* The girl got excited by her new toy.
* The dog grew tired from the activity.
And even more tenuously
* The milk turned sour.
* The food smells good.
* You seem upset.
Predicates formed using a copula may express identity: that the two noun phrases (subject and complement) have the same referent
or express an identical concept:
::I want only ''to be'' myself.
::The Morning Star ''is'' the Evening Star.
They may also express membership of a class or a subset
::She ''was'' a nurse.
::Cats ''are'' carnivorous mammals.
Similarly they may express some property, relation or position, permanent or temporary:
:: The trees ''are'' green.
:: I ''am'' your boss.
:: The hen ''is'' next to the cockerel.
:: The children ''are'' confused.
Other special uses of copular verbs are described in some of the following sections.
Essence vs. state
Some languages use different copulas, or different syntax, when denoting a permanent, essential characteristic of something and when denoting a temporary state. For examples, see the sections on the Romance languages
, Slavic languages
In many languages the principal copula is a verb
, like English ''(to) be'', German ''sein'', Mixtec
etc. It may inflect for grammatical categories
, like other verbs in the language. Being a very commonly used verb, it is likely that the copula has irregular
inflected forms; in English, the verb ''be'' has a number of highly irregular (suppletive
) forms and has more different inflected forms than any other English verb (''am'', ''is'', ''are'', ''was'', ''were'', etc.; see English verbs
Other copulas show more resemblances to pronoun
s. That is the case for Classical Chinese
, for instance. In highly synthetic language
s, copulas are often suffix
es, attached to a noun, but they may still behave otherwise like ordinary verbs: ''-u-'' in Inuit languages
In some other languages, like Beja
, the copula takes the form of suffixes that attach to a noun but are distinct from the person agreement markers
used on predicative verb
This phenomenon is known as ''nonverbal person agreement
'' (or ''nonverbal subject agreement''), and the relevant markers are always established as deriving from clitic
ized independent pronouns.
For cases in which the copula is omitted or takes zero
form, see below.
Additional uses of copular verbs
A copular verb may also have other uses supplementary to or distinct from its uses as a copula.
As auxiliary verbs
The English copular verb ''be'' can be used as an auxiliary verb
, expressing passive voice
(together with the past participle
) or expressing progressive aspect
(together with the present participle
::The man was killed. (passive)
::It is raining. (progressive)
Other languages' copulas have additional uses as auxiliaries. For example, French ''être'' can be used to express passive voice similarly to English ''be'', and both French ''être'' and German ''sein'' are used to express the perfect forms
of certain verbs:
::''Je suis arrivé.'' French for "I have arrived," literally "I am arrived."
The last usage was formerly prevalent in English also. The auxiliary functions of these verbs derive from their copular function, and can be interpreted as a special case of the copular function (the verbal form that follows it being considered adjectival).
Another auxiliary-type usage of the copula in English is together with the ''to''-infinitive
to denote an obligatory action or expected occurrence: "I am to serve you;" "The manager is to resign." It can be put also into past tense: "We were to leave at 9." For forms like "if I was/were to come," see English conditional sentences
. (Note that by certain criteria, the English copula ''be'' may always be considered an auxiliary verb; see Diagnostics for identifying auxiliary verbs in English
The English ''to be'', and its equivalents in certain other languages, also have a non-copular use as an existential verb, meaning "to exist." This use is illustrated in the following sentences: ''I want only to be, and that is enough''; ''I think therefore I am
''; ''To be or not to be
, that is the question.'' In these cases, the verb itself expresses a predicate (that of existence
), rather than linking to a predicative expression as it does when used as a copula. In ontology
it is sometimes suggested that the "is" of existence is reducible to the "is" of property attribution or class membership; to be, Aristotle
held, is to be ''something''. However, Abelard
in his ''Dialectica'' made a ''reductio ad absurdum
'' argument against the idea that the copula can express existence.
Similar examples can be found in many other languages; for example, the French and Latin equivalents of ''I think therefore I am'' are ''Je pense, donc je suis'' and ''Cogito ergo sum'', where ''suis'' and ''sum'' are the equivalents of English "am," normally used as copulas. However, other languages prefer a different verb for existential use, as in the Spanish version ''Pienso, luego existo'' (where the verb ''existir'' "to exist" is used rather than the copula ''ser'' or ''estar'' "to be").
Another type of existential usage is in clauses of the ''there is
...'' or ''there are...'' type. Languages differ in the way they express such meanings; some of them use the copular verb, possibly with an expletive pronoun
like the English ''there'', while other languages use different verbs and constructions, like the French ''il y a'' (which uses parts of the verb ''avoir'' "to have," not the copula ''être'') or the Swedish ''finns'' (the passive voice of the verb for "to find"). For details, see existential clause
Relying on a unified theory of copular sentences, it has been proposed that the English ''there''-sentences are subtypes of inverse copular construction
In some languages, copula omission occurs within a particular grammatical context. For example, speakers of Russian
and Quechuan languages
consistently drop the copula in present tense: Russian: я человек, ''ya chelovek'' "I (am a) person;" Indonesian: ''saya seorang manusia'' "I (am) a human;" Turkish: ''o insan'' "s/he (is a) human;" Hungarian: ''ő ember'' "s/he (is) a human;" Arabic: أنا إنسان, ''ʔanā ʔinsān'' "I (am a) human;" Hebrew: אני אדם, ''ʔani ʔadam'' "I (am a) human;" Geʽez: አነ ብእሲ/ብእሲ አነ ''ʔana bəʔəsi'' / ''bəʔəsi ʔana'' "I (am a) man" / "(a) man I (am)"; Southern Quechua: ''payqa runam'' "s/he (is) a human." The usage is known generically as the zero copula. Note that in other tenses (sometimes in forms other than third person singular), the copula usually reappears.
Some languages drop the copula in poetic or aphorismic
contexts. Examples in English include
* ''The more, the better.''
* ''Out of many, one.''
* ''True that.''
Such poetic copula dropping is more pronounced in some languages other than English, like the Romance language
In informal speech of English, the copula may also be dropped in general sentences, as in "She a nurse." It is a feature of African-American Vernacular English
, but is also used by a variety of other English speakers in informal contexts. An example is the sentence "I saw twelve men, each a soldier."
Examples in specific languages
In Ancient Greek, when an adjective precedes a noun with an article, the copula is understood: ὁ οἴκος ἐστὶ μακρός, "the house is large," can be written μακρός ὁ οἴκος, "large the house (is)."
In Quechua (Southern Quechua
used for the examples), zero copula is restricted to present tense in third person singular (''kan''): ''Payqa runam'' — "(s)he is a human;" but: ''(paykuna) runakunam kanku'' "(they) are human."ap
, the zero copula can be used in predicative expression
s and with continuous verbs (many of which take a copulative verb in many Indo-European languages) — ''He nui te whare'', literally "a big the house," "the house (is) big;" ''I te tēpu te pukapuka'', literally "at (past locative
particle) the table the book," "the book (was) on the table;" ''Nō Ingarangi ia'', literally "from England (s)he," "(s)he (is) from England," ''Kei te kai au'', literally "at the (act of) eating I," "I (am) eating."
Alternatively, in many cases, the particle ''ko'' can be used as a copulative (though not all instances of ''ko'' are used as thus, like all other Maori particles, ''ko'' has multiple purposes): ''Ko nui te whare'' "The house is big;" ''Ko te pukapuka kei te tēpu'' "It is the book (that is) on the table;" ''Ko au kei te kai'' "It is me eating."
However, when expressing identity or class membership, ''ko'' must be used: ''Ko tēnei tāku pukapuka'' "This is my book;" ''Ko Ōtautahi he tāone i Te Waipounamu'' "Christchurch is a city in the South Island (of New Zealand);" ''Ko koe tōku hoa'' "You are my friend."
Note that when expressing identity, ''ko'' can be placed on either object in the clause without changing the meaning (''ko tēnei tāku pukapuka'' is the same as ''ko tāku pukapuka tēnei'') but not on both (''ko tēnei ko tāku pukapuka'' would be equivalent to saying "it is this, it is my book" in English).
In Hungarian, zero copula is restricted to present tense in third person singular and plural: ''Ő ember''/''Ők emberek'' — "s/he is a human"/"they are humans;" but: ''(én) ember vagyok'' "I am a human," ''(te) ember vagy'' "you are a human," ''mi emberek vagyunk'' "we are humans," ''(ti) emberek vagytok'' "you (all) are humans." The copula also reappears for stating locations: ''az emberek a házban vannak'', "the people are in the house," and for stating time: ''hat óra van'', "it is six o'clock." However, the copula may be omitted in colloquial language: ''hat óra (van)'', "it is six o'clock."
Hungarian uses copula ''lenni'' for expressing location: ''Itt van Róbert'' "Bob is here," but it is omitted in the third person present tense for attribution or identity statements: ''Róbert öreg'' "Bob is old;" ''ők éhesek'' "They are hungry;" ''Kati nyelvtudós'' "Cathy is a linguist" (but ''Róbert öreg volt'' "Bob was old," ''éhesek voltak'' "They were hungry," ''Kati nyelvtudós volt'' "Cathy was a linguist).
In Turkish, both the third person singular and the third person plural copulas are omittable. ''Ali burada'' and ''Ali buradadır'' both mean "Ali is here," and ''Onlar aç'' and ''Onlar açlar'' both mean "They are hungry." Both of the sentences are acceptable and grammatically correct, but sentences with the copula are more formal.
The Turkish first person singular copula suffix is omitted when introducing oneself. ''Bora ben'' (I am Bora) is grammatically correct, but "Bora benim" (same sentence with the copula) is not for an introduction (but is grammatically correct in other cases).
Further restrictions may apply before omission is permitted. For example, in the Irish language
, ''is'', the present tense of the copula, may be omitted when the predicate
is a noun. ''Ba'', the past/conditional, cannot be deleted. If the present copula is omitted, the pronoun (e.g., ''é, í, iad'') preceding the noun is omitted as well.
Sometimes, the term ''copula'' is taken to include not only a language's equivalent(s) to the verb ''be'' but also other verbs or forms that serve to link a subject to a predicative expression (while adding semantic
content of their own). For example, English verbs like ''become'', ''get'', ''feel'', ''look'', ''taste'', ''smell'', and ''seem'' can have this function, as in the following sentences (the predicative expression, the complement of the verb, is in italics):
::She became ''a student''.
::They look ''tired''.
::The milk tastes ''bad''.
::That bread smells ''good''.
::I feel ''bad'' that she can't come with us.
::London ''stands'' (is) on the river Thames.
::How is Mary? ; She ''seems'' (is) well (fine).
(This usage should be distinguished from the use of some of these verbs as "action" verbs, as in ''They look at the wall'', in which ''look'' denotes an action and cannot be replaced by the basic copula ''are''.)
Some verbs have rarer, secondary uses as copular verbs, like the verb ''fall'' in sentences like ''The zebra fell victim to the lion.''
These extra copulas are sometimes called "semi-copulas" or "pseudo-copulas." For a list of common verbs of this type in English, see List of English copulae
In particular languages
In Indo-European language
s, the words meaning ''to be'' are sometimes similar to each other. Due to the high frequency of their use, their inflection retains a considerable degree of similarity in some cases. Thus, for example, the English form ''is'' is a cognate
of German ''ist'', Latin ''est'', Persian ''ast'' and Russian ''jest'
'', even though the Germanic, Italic, Iranian and Slavic language groups split at least 3000 years ago. The origins of the copulas of most Indo-European languages can be traced back to four Proto-Indo-European
stems: ''*es-'' (''*h1
es-''), ''*sta-'' (''*steh2
-''), ''*wes-'' and ''*bhu-'' (''*bʰuH-'').
The English copular verb ''be'' has eight forms (more than any other English verb): ''be'', ''am'', ''is'', ''are'', ''being'', ''was'', ''were'', ''been''. Additional archaic forms include ''art'', ''wast'', ''wert'', and occasionally ''beest'' (as a subjunctive
). For more details see English verbs
. For the etymology of the various forms, see Indo-European copula
The main uses of the copula in English are described in the above sections. The possibility of copula omission is mentioned under .
A particular construction found in English (particularly in speech) is the use of two successive copulas
when only one appears necessary, as in ''My point is, is that...''. The acceptability of this construction is a disputed matter in English prescriptive grammar
The simple English copula "be" may on occasion be substituted by other verbs with near identical meanings.
In Persian, the verb ''to be'' can either take the form of ''ast'' (cognate to English ''is'') or ''budan'' (cognate to ''be'').
), the copula होना ɦonɑ ہونا can be put into four grammatical aspects (simple, habitual, perfective, and progressive) and each of those four aspects can be put into five grammatical moods (indicative, presumptive, subjunctive, contrafactual, and imperative).
Some example sentences using the simple aspect are shown below:
Besides the verb होना (to be), there are three other verbs which can also be used as the copula, they are रहना reɦnɑ (to stay), जाना jɑnɑ (to go), and आना ɑnɑ (to come).
The following table shows the conjugations of the copula होना in the five grammatical moods in the simple aspect.
! rowspan="2" |Contrafactual
! rowspan="2" |Past
| colspan="2" |होता
| colspan="2" |होते
| colspan="3" |होती
! rowspan="2" |Imperative
Copulas in the Romance languages
usually consist of two different verbs that can be translated as "to be," the main one from the Latin ''esse'' (via Vulgar Latin
''essere''; ''esse'' deriving from ''*es-''), often referenced as ''sum'' (another of the Latin verb's principal parts
) and a secondary one from ''stare'' (from ''*sta-''), often referenced as ''sto''. The resulting distinction in the modern forms is found in all the Iberian Romance languages
, and to a lesser extent Italian, but not in French or Romanian. The difference is that the first usually refers to essential characteristics, while the second refers to states and situations, e.g., "Bob is old" versus "Bob is well." A similar division is found in the non-Romance Basque language (viz. ''egon'' and ''izan''). (Note that the English words just used, "essential" and "state," are also cognate with the Latin infinitives ''esse'' and ''stare''. The word "stay" also comes from Latin stare, through Middle French ''estai'', stem of Old French ''ester''.) In Spanish and Portuguese, the high degree of verbal inflection
, plus the existence of two copulas (''ser'' and ''estar''), means that there are 105 (Spanish) and 110 (Portuguese) separate forms to express the copula, compared to eight in English and one in Chinese.
In some cases, the verb itself changes the meaning of the adjective/sentence. The following examples are from Portuguese:
Some Slavic language
s make a distinction between essence and state (similar to that discussed in the above section on the Romance
languages), by putting a predicative expression denoting a state into the instrumental case
, and essential characteristics are in the nominative
. This can apply with other copula verbs as well: the verbs for "become" are normally used with the instrumental case.
As noted above under , Russian and other East Slavic languages
generally omit the copula in the present tense.
and Scottish Gaelic
, there are two copulas, and the syntax
is also changed when one is distinguishing between states or situations and essential characteristics.
Describing the subject's state or situation typically uses the normal VSO ordering
with the verb ''bí''. The copula ''is'' is used to state essential characteristics or equivalences.
The word ''is'' is the copula (rhymes with the English word "miss").
The pronoun used with the copula is different from the normal pronoun. For a masculine singular noun, ''é'' is used (for "he" or "it"), as opposed to the normal pronoun ''sé''; for a feminine singular noun, ''í'' is used (for "she" or "it"), as opposed to normal pronoun ''sí''; for plural nouns, ''iad'' is used (for "they" or "those"), as opposed to the normal pronoun ''siad''.
To describe being in a state, condition, place, or act, the verb "to be" is used: ''Tá mé ag rith.'' "I am running."
, a Bantu
language spoken mainly in Malawi
, a very similar distinction exists between permanent and temporary states as in Spanish and Portuguese, but only in the present tense. For a permanent state, in the 3rd person, the copula used in the present tense is ''ndi'' (negative ''sí''):
:''iyé ndi mphunzitsi'' "he is a teacher"
:''iyé sí mphunzitsi'' "he is not a teacher"
For the 1st and 2nd persons the particle ''ndi'' is combined with pronouns, e.g. ''ine'' "I":
:''ine ndine mphunzitsi'' "I am a teacher"
:''iwe ndiwe mphunzitsi'' "you (singular) are a teacher"
:''ine síndine mphunzitsi'' "I am not a teacher"
For temporary states and location, the copula is the appropriate form of the defective verb ''-li'':
:''iyé ali bwino'' "he is well"
:''iyé sáli bwino'' "he is not well"
:''iyé ali ku nyumbá'' "he is in the house"
For the 1st and 2nd persons the person is shown, as normally with Chichewa verbs, by the appropriate pronominal prefix:
:''ine ndili bwino'' "I am well"
:''iwe uli bwino'' "you (sg.) are well"
:''kunyumbá kuli bwino'' "at home (everything) is fine"
In the past tenses, ''-li'' is used for both types of copula:
:''iyé analí bwino'' "he was well (this morning)"
:''iyé ánaalí mphunzitsi'' "he was a teacher (at that time)"
In the future, subjunctive, or conditional tenses, a form of the verb ''khala'' ("sit/dwell") is used as a copula:
:''máwa ákhala bwino'' "he'll be fine tomorrow"
Uniquely, the existence of the copulative verbalizer suffix in the Southern Peruvian Aymaran
language variety, Muylaq' Aymara, is evident only in the surfacing of a vowel that would otherwise have been deleted because of the presence of a following suffix, lexically prespecified to suppress it. As the copulative verbalizer has no independent phonetic structure, it is represented by the Greek letter ʋ in the examples used in this entry.
Accordingly, unlike in most other Aymaran variants, whose copulative verbalizer is expressed with a vowel-lengthening component, -'':'', the presence of the copulative verbalizer in Muylaq' Aymara is often not apparent on the surface at all and is analyzed as existing only meta-linguistically. However, it is also relevant to note that in a verb phrase like "It is old," the noun ''thantha'' meaning "old" does not require the copulative verbalizer, ''thantha-wa'' "It is old."
It is now pertinent to make some observations about the distribution of the copulative verbalizer. The best place to start is with words in which its presence or absence is obvious. When the vowel-suppressing first person simple tense suffix attaches to a verb, the vowel of the immediately preceding suffix is suppressed (in the examples in this subsection, the subscript "c" appears prior to vowel-suppressing suffixes in the interlinear gloss to better distinguish instances of deletion
that arise from the presence of a lexically pre-specified suffix from those that arise from other (e.g. phonotactic) motivations). Consider the verb ''sara''- which is inflected for the first person simple tense and so, predictably, loses its final root vowel: ''sar(a)-c
t-wa'' "I go."
However, prior to the suffixation of the first person simple suffix -''c
t'' to the same root nominalized with the agentive nominalizer -''iri'', the word must be verbalized. The fact that the final vowel of -''iri'' below is not suppressed indicates the presence of an intervening segment, the copulative verbalizer: ''sar(a)-iri-ʋ-t-wa'' "I usually go."
It is worthwhile to compare of the copulative verbalizer in Muylaq' Aymara as compared to La Paz Aymara, a variant which represents this suffix with vowel lengthening. Consider the near-identical sentences below, both translations of "I have a small house" in which the nominal root ''uta-ni'' "house-attributive" is verbalized with the copulative verbalizer, but note that the correspondence between the copulative verbalizer in these two variants is not always a strict one-to-one relation.
As in English, the verb "to be" (''qopna'') is irregular in Georgian
(a Kartvelian language
); different verb roots are employed in different tenses. The roots -''ar''-, -''kn''-, -''qav''-, and -''qop''- (past participle) are used in the present tense, future tense, past tense and the perfective tenses respectively. Examples:
Note that, in the last two examples (perfective and pluperfect), two roots are used in one verb compound. In the perfective tense, the root ''qop'' (which is the expected root for the perfective tense) is followed by the root ''ar'', which is the root for the present tense. In the pluperfective tense, again, the root ''qop'' is followed by the past tense root ''qav''. This formation is very similar to German
(an Indo-European language
), where the perfect and the pluperfect are expressed in the following way:
Here, ''gewesen'' is the past participle of ''sein'' ("to be") in German. In both examples, as in Georgian, this participle is used together with the present and the past forms of the verb in order to conjugate for the perfect and the pluperfect aspects.
, a French-based creole language
, has three forms of the copula: ''se'', ''ye'', and the zero copula
, no word at all (the position of which will be indicated with ''Ø'', just for purposes of illustration).
Although no textual record exists of Haitian-Creole at its earliest stages of development from French, ''se'' is derived from French (written ''c'est''), which is the normal French contraction of (that, written ''ce'') and the copula (is, written ''est'') (a form of the verb ''être'').
The derivation of ''ye'' is less obvious; but we can assume that the French source was ("he/it is," written ''il est''), which, in rapidly spoken French, is very commonly pronounced as (typically written ''y est'').
The use of a zero copula is unknown in French, and it is thought to be an innovation from the early days when Haitian-Creole was first developing as a Romance-based pidgin
. Latin also sometimes used a zero copula.
Which of ''se'' / ''ye'' / ''Ø'' is used in any given copula clause depends on complex syntactic factors that we can superficially summarize in the following four rules:
1. Use ''Ø'' (i.e., no word at all) in declarative sentences where the complement is an adjective phrase, prepositional phrase, or adverb phrase:
2. Use ''se'' when the complement is a noun phrase. But note that, whereas other verbs come ''after'' any tense/mood/aspect particles (like ''pa'' to mark negation, or ''te'' to explicitly mark past tense, or ''ap'' to mark progressive aspect), ''se'' comes ''before'' any such particles:
3. Use ''se'' where French and English have a dummy "it"
4. Finally, use the other copula form ''ye'' in situations where the sentence's syntax leaves the copula at the end of a phrase:
The above is, however, only a simplified analysis.
has copulae that are most often translated as the "to be" verb of English.
The Japanese copula has many forms. The words ''da'' and ''desu'' are used to predicate
sentences, while ''na'' and ''de'' are particles used within sentences to modify or connect.
Japanese sentences with copulas most often equate one thing with another, that is, they are of the form "A is B." Examples:
The difference between ''da'' and ''desu'' appears simple. For instance, ''desu'' is more formal and polite
than ''da''. Thus, many sentences like the ones below are almost identical in meaning and differ in the speaker's politeness to the addressee
and in nuance of how assured the person is of their statement. However, ''desu'' may never come before the end of a sentence, and ''da'' is used exclusively to delineate subordinate clauses.
Japanese sentences may be predicated with copulas or with verbs. However, ''desu'' may not always be a predicate. In some cases, its only function is to make a sentence predicated with a stative verb
more polite. However, ''da'' always functions as a predicate, so it cannot be combined with a stative verb, because sentences need only one predicate. See the examples below.
There are several theories
as to the origin of ''desu''; one is that it is a shortened form of であります ''de arimasu'', which is a polite form of である ''de aru''. In general, both forms are used in only writing and more formal situations. Another form, でございます ''de gozaimasu'', which is the more formal version of ''de arimasu'', in the etymological sense a conjugation of でござる ''de gozaru'' and an honorific suffix -ます ''-masu'', is also used in some situations and is very polite. Note that ''de aru'' and ''de gozaru'' are considered to be compounds of a particle で ''de'', and existential verbs ''aru'' and ''gozaru''. です ''desu'' may be pronounced っす ''ssu'' in colloquial speech. The copula is subject to dialectal variation throughout Japan, resulting in forms like や ''ya'' in Kansai
and じゃ ''ja'' in Hiroshima
(see map above).
Japanese also has two verbs corresponding to English "to be": ''aru'' and ''iru''. They are not copulas but existential verbs. ''Aru'' is used for inanimate objects, including plants, whereas ''iru'' is used for animate things like people, animals, and robots, though there are exceptions to this generalization.
speakers, when learning English, often drop the auxiliary verbs "be" and "do," incorrectly believing that "be" is a semantically empty copula equivalent to "desu" and "da."
For sentences with predicate nominatives, the copula "이" (i-) is added to the predicate nominative (with no space in between).
Some adjectives (usually colour adjectives) are nominalized and used with the copula "이"(i-).
1. Without the copula "이"(i-):
2. With the copula "이"(i-):
Some Korean adjectives are derived using the copula. Separating these articles and nominalizing the former part will often result in a sentence with a related, but different meaning. Using the separated sentence in a situation where the un-separated sentence is appropriate is usually acceptable as the listener can decide what the speaker is trying to say using the context.
N.B. The characters used are simplified ones, and the transcriptions given in italics reflect Standard Chinese pronunciation, using the pinyin system.
, both states and qualities are, in general, expressed with stative verb
s (SV) with no need for a copula, e.g., in Chinese
, "to be tired" (累 ''lèi''), "to be hungry" (饿 ''è''), "to be located at" (在 ''zài''), "to be stupid" (笨 ''bèn'') and so forth. A sentence can consist simply of a pronoun and such a verb: for example, 我饿 ''wǒ è'' ("I am hungry"). Usually, however, verbs expressing qualities are qualified by an adverb (meaning "very," "not," "quite," etc.); when not otherwise qualified, they are often preceded by 很 ''hěn'', which in other contexts means "very," but in this use often has no particular meaning.
Only sentences with a noun as the complement (e.g., "This is my sister") use the copular verb "to be": . This is used frequently; for example, instead of having a verb meaning "to be Chinese," the usual expression is "to be a Chinese person" (; "I am a Chinese person;" "I am Chinese"). This is sometimes called an equative
verb. Another possibility is for the complement to be just a noun modifier (ending in ), the noun being omitted:
Before the Han Dynasty
, the character 是 served as a demonstrative pronoun
meaning "this." (This usage survives in some idioms and proverbs
.) Some linguists believe that 是 developed into a copula because it often appeared, as a repetitive subject, after the subject of a sentence (in classical Chinese
we can say, for example: "George W. Bush, ''this'' president of the United States" meaning "George W. Bush ''is'' the president of the United States). The character 是 appears to be formed as a compound
of characters with the meanings of "early" and "straight."
Another use of 是 in modern Chinese is in combination with the modifier 的 ''de'' to mean "yes" or to show agreement. For example:
Question: 你的汽车是不是红色的？ ''nǐ de qìchē shì bú shì hóngsè de?'' "Is your car red or not?"
Response: 是的 ''shì de'' "Is," meaning "Yes," or 不是 ''bú shì'' "Not is," meaning "No."
(A more common way of showing that the person asking the question is correct is by simply saying "right" or "correct," 对 ''duì''; the corresponding negative answer is 不对 ''bú duì'', "not right.")
Yet another use of 是 is in the ''shì...(de)'' construction, which is used to emphasize a particular element of the sentence; see .
是 ''sī'' acts as the copula, and 是 is the equivalent in Wu Chinese
uses 係 () instead of 是; similarly, Hakka
uses 係 ''he55
In Siouan languages like Lakota
, in principle almost all words—according to their structure—are verbs. So not only (transitive, intransitive and so-called "stative") verbs but even nouns often behave like verbs and do not need to have copulas.
For example, the word ''wičháša'' refers to a man, and the verb "to-be-a-man" is expressed as ''wimáčhaša/winíčhaša/wičháša'' (I am/you are/he is a man). Yet there also is a copula ''héčha'' (to be a ...) that in most cases is used: ''wičháša hemáčha/heníčha/héčha'' (I am/you are/he is a man).
In order to express the statement "I am a doctor of profession," one has to say ''pezuta wičháša hemáčha''. But, in order to express that that person is THE doctor (say, that had been phoned to help), one must use another copula ''iyé'' (to be the one): ''pežúta wičháša (kiŋ) miyé yeló'' (medicine-man DEF ART I-am-the-one MALE ASSERT).
In order to refer to space (e.g., Robert is in the house), various verbs are used, e.g., ''yaŋkÁ'' (lit., to sit) for humans, or ''háŋ/hé'' (to stand upright) for inanimate objects of a certain shape. "Robert is in the house" could be translated as ''Robert thimáhel yaŋké (yeló)'', whereas "There's one restaurant next to the gas station" translates as ''Owótethipi wígli-oínažiŋ kiŋ hél isákhib waŋ hé''.
The constructed language Lojban
has two words that act similar to a copula in natural languages. The clause ''me ... me'u'' turns whatever follows it into a predicate that means to be (among) what it follows. For example, ''me la .bob. (me'u)'' means "to be Bob," and ''me le ci mensi (me'u)'' means "to be one of the three sisters." Another one is ''du'', which is itself a predicate that means all its arguments are the same thing (equal). One word which is often confused for a copula in Lojban, but isn't one, is ''cu''. It merely indicates that the word which follows is the main predicate of the sentence. For example, ''lo pendo be mi cu zgipre'' means "my friend is a musician," but the word ''cu'' does not correspond to English ''is''; instead, the word ''zgipre'', which is a predicate, corresponds to the entire phrase "is a musician". The word ''cu'' is used to prevent ''lo pendo be mi zgipre'', which would mean "the friend-of-me type of musician".
* Indo-European copula
* Nominal sentence
* Stative verb
* Subject complement
* Zero copula
* (See "copular sentences" and "existential sentences and expletive ''there''" in Volume II.)
Moro, A. (1997) ''The Raising of Predicates''. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
* Tüting, A. W. (December 2003). Essay on Lakota syntax
Category:Parts of speech